Rangers tackle is the same as this one here watch?v=R2Ta9OfnVbM&feature=related in terms that he places his left hand on the player before the shoulder making it legal. Its just the whole fuss that NZ gets away with murder that is making everyone say he got off lightly. In what ever book you read, his left hand was on the player and therefore legal. Now he should toughen up like Lealifano and admit it was a good tackle.
Ranger's tackle was legitimate. Watch it from behind, his left hand briefly goes around Kirchner which is all that is needed for it to be legal. De Villiers however was hardly legal as he lifted him and dropped him on his head! And if you are going to complain about SA always getting bans... its because they often play the dirtiest of the SANZAR countries (as in illegal tackles or blatant outburst). Players like Botha thoroughly deserve the sentences they got...
Errm, didn;t Rangers left arm embrace the waist of Kirchener? Isn't that a legitimate tackle then? Sorry MR SAFFA commentate, but you got a bad case of the one eyed boggies there. trying to compare Rangers TACKLE to the spear tackle by de villiers as a way to support this spurious conspiracy theory is really clutching at straws.
@toolfan222 If you see the try from nonu you will see just before that conrad smith illegally charged around the ruck to take out morne steyn and kirchner who werent in the ruck. This left a hole for nonu to power through for his try! clearly poor refereeing for allowing the try and not penalising all blacks. - the way its been the whole of 2010!
@BoobHornyGuy lol and yor from sa i bet look at the game against samoa in the rwc burger is allways offside at rucks and scrums stfu the way its been every year sine 2001
Are you seriously comparing the 2. De Villiers turned him upside down, a few more degrees and ranger woulve landed straight on his head. Rangers would have been perfectly legal had he managed to put his arms a bit further around Kirschner.
@UHtiger my God, have you read what you have written dumb-wit. You've WC cabinet is fuller than your cranium( that's head/skull for the obtuse (that's simple-minded()
@UHtiger I realized your level of intelligence and narrow mindedness and thought i should stoop down to your level. iv spent a lot of time in NZ and have met some great, intelligent people. Most have being pure scholars of the game who know and love their rugby. Reading all these remarks from you and your fellow characters brings me to the conclusion that you are all from the bottom of the barrel. Come WC i will be spending my time with the cream of NZ and not with the slime
@DoctorRoberts18 Rangers is barely illegal mate. A shoulder change is when the player makes no attempt to use his arms in the tackle. Ranger clearly goes into the tackle with his arm out.
As long as the arm is involved in the tackle, its not a shoulder charge. Where is Rene's left arm? Its what initially wraps Kirchner. Legal tackle. JDV's tackle however is illegal. Lifts him above his waist and doesn't put him down softly and therefore warrants a citing.
are you fucking retarded, rene was ripped off getting a penalty against him and that spear tackle of de villiers woulda got a few weeks even in the nrl. clearly the uploader is another naiive south african
@ocarpo couldn't agree more. This is a genuine dangerous tackle. A shoulder charge (which is what the uploader is complaining about) isn't even fucking dangerous, it just smashes the person, hence is it legal in the NRL. Stupid uploader.
@KeenOnTaka fuck the NRL. Its a dieing sport anyway..only played in like 5 countries.. soo shit... Union is way better and they have just released figures that its the 3rd biggest event in world sport behind Football and the olympics.
I have no problem with the Ranger tackle - there was arms in the tackle however he never had time to wrap them around Zane Kirchner as he was flying - Great Shot
2 week suspension for Jean De Villiers is also joke as there was not much in that either and so was the sin binning of Roussouw.
Rangers tackle is the same as this one here watch?v=R2Ta9OfnVbM&feature=related in terms that he places his left hand on the player before the shoulder making it legal. Its just the whole fuss that NZ gets away with murder that is making everyone say he got off lightly. In what ever book you read, his left hand was on the player and therefore legal. Now he should toughen up like Lealifano and admit it was a good tackle.
barsKuu 7 months ago
Ranger's tackle was legitimate. Watch it from behind, his left hand briefly goes around Kirchner which is all that is needed for it to be legal. De Villiers however was hardly legal as he lifted him and dropped him on his head! And if you are going to complain about SA always getting bans... its because they often play the dirtiest of the SANZAR countries (as in illegal tackles or blatant outburst). Players like Botha thoroughly deserve the sentences they got...
barsKuu 7 months ago
Errm, didn;t Rangers left arm embrace the waist of Kirchener? Isn't that a legitimate tackle then? Sorry MR SAFFA commentate, but you got a bad case of the one eyed boggies there. trying to compare Rangers TACKLE to the spear tackle by de villiers as a way to support this spurious conspiracy theory is really clutching at straws.
opiatedmonkey 9 months ago
OMG listen to your faggot commentators having a good old cry over a legitimate tackle.
littlebrolina 9 months ago
Yellow card soft c@#ks
Charisma790 9 months ago
legit tackle by ranger, flattened him, de villiers drop ranger on his head
toolfan222 10 months ago 6
@toolfan222 If you see the try from nonu you will see just before that conrad smith illegally charged around the ruck to take out morne steyn and kirchner who werent in the ruck. This left a hole for nonu to power through for his try! clearly poor refereeing for allowing the try and not penalising all blacks. - the way its been the whole of 2010!
BoobHornyGuy 7 months ago
@BoobHornyGuy lol and yor from sa i bet look at the game against samoa in the rwc burger is allways offside at rucks and scrums stfu the way its been every year sine 2001
vGreedy 5 months ago
ETS A YULLUW CURD EMEEDIUTLEE....... bloody piss arse commentry
kaezer2 10 months ago 6
What a joke, there is definitely arms in Ranger's tackle.
nzjonty 11 months ago
Ranger SMASHED HIM BRO!
misnomer12 11 months ago
Are you seriously comparing the 2. De Villiers turned him upside down, a few more degrees and ranger woulve landed straight on his head. Rangers would have been perfectly legal had he managed to put his arms a bit further around Kirschner.
UHtiger 11 months ago
@UHtiger my God, have you read what you have written dumb-wit. You've WC cabinet is fuller than your cranium( that's head/skull for the obtuse (that's simple-minded()
DLR1274 7 months ago
@DLR1274 Can't do much more than laugh when people are trying to SOUND intelligent and then write "You've WC cabinet is fuller". Bahahahaha.
UHtiger 7 months ago
@UHtiger I realized your level of intelligence and narrow mindedness and thought i should stoop down to your level. iv spent a lot of time in NZ and have met some great, intelligent people. Most have being pure scholars of the game who know and love their rugby. Reading all these remarks from you and your fellow characters brings me to the conclusion that you are all from the bottom of the barrel. Come WC i will be spending my time with the cream of NZ and not with the slime
DLR1274 7 months ago
ranger's just needs more arms, but de villiers' one could brake his neck
DanB878 11 months ago
rangers left arm wraps him but the hit was so hard he went flying!
c0lezy 1 year ago
Ranger tried wrapping his arms but Kirchner bumped off him so fast he couldnt.....
kahatuatini 1 year ago
Both are extremely illegal... Ranger's is worse though
DoctorRoberts18 1 year ago
@DoctorRoberts18 Rangers is barely illegal mate. A shoulder change is when the player makes no attempt to use his arms in the tackle. Ranger clearly goes into the tackle with his arm out.
aaaapaapt 1 year ago
Fuck that was a mean hit. 100% pure force
Kingdkr1 1 year ago
Ranger hits so hard he barely has time to use his arms, case and point his tackle against the brumbies.
nzpyro 1 year ago
As long as the arm is involved in the tackle, its not a shoulder charge. Where is Rene's left arm? Its what initially wraps Kirchner. Legal tackle. JDV's tackle however is illegal. Lifts him above his waist and doesn't put him down softly and therefore warrants a citing.
Dethragos 1 year ago
You're a moron beyond belief if you think Ranger's hit was dangerous OR illegal. And your bias commentators are pathetic.
MehrtsNZ 1 year ago
are you fucking retarded, rene was ripped off getting a penalty against him and that spear tackle of de villiers woulda got a few weeks even in the nrl. clearly the uploader is another naiive south african
ocarpo 1 year ago
@ocarpo couldn't agree more. This is a genuine dangerous tackle. A shoulder charge (which is what the uploader is complaining about) isn't even fucking dangerous, it just smashes the person, hence is it legal in the NRL. Stupid uploader.
KeenOnTaka 1 year ago
@KeenOnTaka fuck the NRL. Its a dieing sport anyway..only played in like 5 countries.. soo shit... Union is way better and they have just released figures that its the 3rd biggest event in world sport behind Football and the olympics.
corsa14i 1 year ago
uploader is a pussy, getting mad that ranger didn't get charged for his huge and legal hit.
NZDubstep 1 year ago
not only is rangers tackle bigger but it wus actualy legal nuthing in it
7dayspking 1 year ago
Good, solid and legal tackle by Ranger.
ImEasyAs 1 year ago
I have no problem with the Ranger tackle - there was arms in the tackle however he never had time to wrap them around Zane Kirchner as he was flying - Great Shot
2 week suspension for Jean De Villiers is also joke as there was not much in that either and so was the sin binning of Roussouw.
PaulieNZ1976 1 year ago
@PaulieNZ1976 Agree!
JJDemons79 1 year ago
@PaulieNZ1976 there were arms in rangers tackle ? go watch again dummy.
corsa14i 1 year ago