The guy at 4.28 must be a liberty principle purist; he seems so furious about Jo Wolff's suggestion that he writes a memo reminding himself to murder him after the lecture.
You should do a video about social media. Do we expect that our facebook page and or other social media postings should be considered private? Have we lowered our standards with respect to our right to privacy or should there be an exception that anything posted on the internet is public and is free for anyone to read and/or use as they see fit?
@hd92122 excellent idea - Id be interested in this as well. Id also like to hear someone address ethical considerations of social media for those whom dont actively participate (eg the family and friends discussed and photographed in facebook pages, children whose lives are chronicled in public by their parents etc). What does privacy mean for those people have who havent voluntarily participated in the social media
gambling is always a bad idea, the people who win tell everyone, the people who lose (99.99999%) are too ashamed to tell anyone what a fool they are. its the perfect advertisement. The reason it is moral to put restrictions on gambling is because gambling itself is a directly immoral predatory institution. prays on the weak.
@RunyTheAtheist yeah agree the video was interesting, thumbs up.... - was just a throw away comment on the intro to these RSA videos being so grating - i thought it a bit tough for the other guys comment to be labelled as spam (I dont care that much...)
@2plus2make4 it's not horrible per se but it's been the same for too long and it just is too plain long.... intros should be 3 seconds MAX. to let people know what channel they're watching and maybe a little peek on the content. 30seconds is just sooooooo looooong. the guys at the society dont get that its a new century, where every sec counts. we need content, not context, we got that from the channel name. oldfags -_-
This has been flagged as spam show
ty
makeiteasyable 2 months ago
I love the presentation. I love the topic.
felpaluche 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The guy at 4.28 must be a liberty principle purist; he seems so furious about Jo Wolff's suggestion that he writes a memo reminding himself to murder him after the lecture.
NowWeCanSleep 6 months ago
Comment removed
NowWeCanSleep 6 months ago
His arguements come across much better in the full length audio-version.
Limposium 8 months ago
sheep watch
twistedbass15 8 months ago
if only philosophy and public life weren't expressed as so mutually exclusive.
xjustamem0ryx 8 months ago 5
You should do a video about social media. Do we expect that our facebook page and or other social media postings should be considered private? Have we lowered our standards with respect to our right to privacy or should there be an exception that anything posted on the internet is public and is free for anyone to read and/or use as they see fit?
hd92122 8 months ago 2
@hd92122 excellent idea - Id be interested in this as well. Id also like to hear someone address ethical considerations of social media for those whom dont actively participate (eg the family and friends discussed and photographed in facebook pages, children whose lives are chronicled in public by their parents etc). What does privacy mean for those people have who havent voluntarily participated in the social media
2plus2make4 8 months ago
What's with his head? (literally)
Brust90 8 months ago
gambling is always a bad idea, the people who win tell everyone, the people who lose (99.99999%) are too ashamed to tell anyone what a fool they are. its the perfect advertisement. The reason it is moral to put restrictions on gambling is because gambling itself is a directly immoral predatory institution. prays on the weak.
meadowsirl 8 months ago
@meadowsirl Always a bad idea? how do you deal with the people who enjoy it, but dont have any problem
2plus2make4 8 months ago
interesting talk - loved the anecdote at 15min.
2plus2make4 8 months ago 7
This has been flagged as spam show
i'm really really really sick of your stupid intro
Ramsez 8 months ago
@Ramsez I actually agree with this - it is horrible...
2plus2make4 8 months ago
@2plus2make4 I personally love it, but I'm more interested in the video to be honest :).
RunyTheAtheist 8 months ago
@RunyTheAtheist yeah agree the video was interesting, thumbs up.... - was just a throw away comment on the intro to these RSA videos being so grating - i thought it a bit tough for the other guys comment to be labelled as spam (I dont care that much...)
2plus2make4 8 months ago
@2plus2make4 it's not horrible per se but it's been the same for too long and it just is too plain long.... intros should be 3 seconds MAX. to let people know what channel they're watching and maybe a little peek on the content. 30seconds is just sooooooo looooong. the guys at the society dont get that its a new century, where every sec counts. we need content, not context, we got that from the channel name. oldfags -_-
Ramsez 8 months ago
@Ramsez agree
2plus2make4 8 months ago
FREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEDOMMMMMMMMM
Cableguy008 8 months ago 3