They are called the MODERN, and we are called the POST-MODERN. What did we learn from the Modern's first attempts at Modernism that is a improvement? New habits of living, perhaps. Everybody wants to be closer to free. We re not as miltant. We have tamed the Spartan side of our nature. Now, we must tame the Athenian side or die lie ROME of the rot of greed. The Idea of Republic and commonwealth is the ideal. And the price of liberty is eternal vigilance: a race between ed and catastrophe
Some of the comments here are absolutely ridiculous. Shaw was a relative pacifist, who's ideals were shrouded in sarcasm & misdirection. I don't claim to understand the man, and yet some of the misinformed 'keyboard warriors' on Youtube like to think they are experts on his personal ideology.
The only certainty about the man though; was that he was a literary genius.
There is no argument. George Bernard Shaw is being serious, he's evil and so are you for supporting him. And would someone so intellectually superior as you claim to be really be arguing with someone on the youtube comments section. You share delusions of grandeur with George and it is disappointing the world has to suffer people like you who think they can dictate to others. Being smart does not automatically make you a nice human being. Enjoy your life and let others enjoy theirs.
One must learn to love oneself before one can truly love others!
The man lived into his 90's, and what he did say made a lot of sense. Why should we have to put up with time wasters/criminals/lazy people for whom take and never give?
This is what happens when people who believe in the doctrine of philosophy and the dialectic method are allowed to run amuck. The same thread runs through all peoples who believe in the doctrine of philosophy in one form or another. Whether it be Hegel, or Marx &Engels or Lenin or Hitler ... etc. Shaw was an self indulged, arrogant, pompous, man who held himself in high esteem and wisdom above all other men. He sat himself as judge over all men, choosing who should live and who should die.
@bobbykhawk I agree with you mostly, but I would rephrase it. I don''t think that someone with high self esteem who holds his wisdom above all other men would want to control who lives or who dies. Someone who holds himself in high esteem would rather be productive and worry about his own life without trying to control others. Shaw was more of a parasite than a rational being imo.
Go to Wikipedia and check out Shaw's Fabian Window and take a good look at the alumni list of his Fabian Socialist school - The London School Of Economics. The School says it wants to distance itself from Shaw's Fabian Socialist ideas, but his window championing the remolding of the world featuring a wolf in sheep's clothing is still on display in the George Bernard Shaw library
@al1936 well if that is even true, and with tongue in cheek he calls repeatedly for gassing 'unproductive' people, doesnt that also present a problem? Its like someone continuously telling racist jokes. why would it be funny? And why should we believe your mask of sarcasm when you have repeated it so many times. perhaps the more important question is, if Shaw wasnt kidding would it matter to you? Would you then say he is a monster?
I cannot tell how glad I am that all the other poets like Homer, Shakespeare, Euripides, Schiller, Molière or Goethe lived in an age where there was no television; and I hate to admit it (and it is your fault alone Monsieur Nietzsche for destroying all illusions about artists as brave heroic individuals, which stood against the world for the sake of beauty, wisdom, truth and their art as the incarnation of al this): But Shakespeare does look on his pictures to be the same kind of coxcomb!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Here's a man who should have been killed! If I were alive in his time... I would have gladly taken my pistol, put it against his temple and taken that scumbag out of the world. Everyone who loves or idolizes this man should also be killed.
hated or loved, he will be remembered and discussed longer than any of us on here, he was a genius you are not, doesn't matter whether or not he was evil
@zeppelin2k What the hell are you going on about! And 8 people have thumbed your comment up as well! Jesus you people are sick. It "doesn't matter whether or not he was evil". I can't believe you wrote those words and others agree with you! Unbelievable. Please tell me all 9 of you don't live in the UK?
@annuity100 If a person figured out a way to cure humanity of all their illnesses, would it matter whether or not they were evil? Answer that for yourself first, then ask yourself: if someone was capable of that, could they even be considered evil in the first place? Open up your mind, or you will just be looking at trees for the rest of your life...
@annuity100 Seems I was right. When people are losing an argument and have nothing coherent to say the lesser minds usually resort to lashing out. You probably can't even state your reason for thinking that this video or the man himself was evil. And you used the word twat which we don't use here in the Americas, so I'm guessing you're the Brit who wished he was North American and that's what has got you wound up...
@zeppelin2k There is no argument. George Bernard Shaw is being serious, he's evil and so are you for supporting him. And would someone so intellectually superior as you claim to be really be arguing with someone on the youtube comments section. You share delusions of grandeur with George and it is disappointing the world has to suffer people like you who think they can dictate to others. Being smart does not automatically make you a nice human being. Enjoy your life and let others enjoy theirs.
@annuity100 No matter how eloquent the words that is still a concede to defeat, to an argument you started in the first place I might add. An argument you probably presumed that you could win, then realized you were outmatched, outwitted, and outclassed in. I agree however (with your hypocritical statement) that people should not argue online, unless of course they have the mental capacity to constructively do so; so in your case you should refrain. Go watch the FOX News you hoople.
@zeppelin2k haha, you certainly make it self-evident that you are not a genius, and anyway if you are among the non-geniuses why does it matter what you say? If we are only to listen to the geniuses why should we listen to you? Putting someone beyond good and evil is simply a meaningless thing to say.
"Socialism means equality of income or nothing... under socialism you would not be allowed to be poor. You would be forcibly fed, clothed, lodged, taught, and employed whether you like it or not. If it were discovered that you had not character enough to be worth all this trouble, you might possibly be executed in a kindly manner; but whilst you were permitted to live you would have to live well."
George Bernard Shaw - The Intelligent Woman's Guide to Socialism and Capitalism (1928) p470
But the progressives have infiltrated both parties. It's not just the left anymore. The people that feel the way Shaw did are infesting the American political system from all avenues in all parties.
& I lived in Shaw's home Shaw's Corner for 8 years when I was Custodian of the property & slept in his bed ! Very very Coooool. Right on jaaaaayynnee.
America made Shaw rich, but he never talks about that. I notice he never gave HIS money away, only other peoples'. You and Shaw belong together, poofter.
If you want to have a discussion of philosophy, that is fine. But to call someone you don't even know names, from far away, in a text box is dehumanizing to both of us. Can't you see? That's exactly the attitude throughout history that has petrified humanity and kept us all from spiritually evolving beyond the need for money, war, and all of this greed and dread? I just don't know why people can't wake up and just be real with eachother. Its like, we're all so much the same... but so afraid...
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Our Constitution is the only thing that separated our great nation from the brutal oligarchy's and fascist regimes of Europe in the 20'th century. I wonder if Shaw would have anything to say about that now, from his grave, as he burns in Hell.
You're country was a European invention you American fuck-wit! Democracy, I think you'll find, is a Greek word. Now go eat your words while you re-examine what that gun-slinging yahoo you've called a president for the past 8 years has done in the middle east.
HELLO-- Libertarian here, not Republican- We are the people against the war in Iraq, against American Imperialism, and the abolition (or at least full regulation) of the private central banking hierarchy responsible for funding all sides of all wars for the past 200 years. Get a clue. Believe it or not, not everyone here is for Isreal putting Palestinians in concentration camps, torture, detainment, and war. You don't need to use profanity. Our president is evil, not stupid. Obama, the same.
Fight globalism, not people. The war of ideas is much bigger than you and me. And Shaw did say those things. I am not making that up, though with a little research, its pretty obvious he tried to redeem himself later in life- referring to his earlier political beliefs as naive. Socialism COULD work, just as Democracy COULD work as well- it's just up to people to find a way to keep evil from rising to power as it has for centuries. Same story, history repeating itself...
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
This man called for the death of millions of people. He supported Stalin and Hitler's rise to power. He was a Marxian socialist who believed in the systematic killing of "undesirables". He wrote that what the world needed was 'a humane gas that will kill instantly and painlessly'; and for the extermination of 'useless races' on a scientific bases.
"Hitler found exactly what Shaw had called for in the Zyklon-B gas with which he snuffed out the lives of six million Jews and other 'useless races.'
There is always Shakespeare and Franklin, Emerson and Mill, if you don't these paper mache Philosophers.
rgaleny 2 weeks ago
They are called the MODERN, and we are called the POST-MODERN. What did we learn from the Modern's first attempts at Modernism that is a improvement? New habits of living, perhaps. Everybody wants to be closer to free. We re not as miltant. We have tamed the Spartan side of our nature. Now, we must tame the Athenian side or die lie ROME of the rot of greed. The Idea of Republic and commonwealth is the ideal. And the price of liberty is eternal vigilance: a race between ed and catastrophe
rgaleny 2 weeks ago
Some of the comments here are absolutely ridiculous. Shaw was a relative pacifist, who's ideals were shrouded in sarcasm & misdirection. I don't claim to understand the man, and yet some of the misinformed 'keyboard warriors' on Youtube like to think they are experts on his personal ideology.
The only certainty about the man though; was that he was a literary genius.
jonydols 3 weeks ago
Who's for the last few choc ice's.....
bobwaits 7 months ago
There is no argument. George Bernard Shaw is being serious, he's evil and so are you for supporting him. And would someone so intellectually superior as you claim to be really be arguing with someone on the youtube comments section. You share delusions of grandeur with George and it is disappointing the world has to suffer people like you who think they can dictate to others. Being smart does not automatically make you a nice human being. Enjoy your life and let others enjoy theirs.
annuity100 11 months ago
One must learn to love oneself before one can truly love others!
The man lived into his 90's, and what he did say made a lot of sense. Why should we have to put up with time wasters/criminals/lazy people for whom take and never give?
MrJasonSmarts 1 year ago
This is what happens when people who believe in the doctrine of philosophy and the dialectic method are allowed to run amuck. The same thread runs through all peoples who believe in the doctrine of philosophy in one form or another. Whether it be Hegel, or Marx &Engels or Lenin or Hitler ... etc. Shaw was an self indulged, arrogant, pompous, man who held himself in high esteem and wisdom above all other men. He sat himself as judge over all men, choosing who should live and who should die.
bobbykhawk 1 year ago
@bobbykhawk I agree with you mostly, but I would rephrase it. I don''t think that someone with high self esteem who holds his wisdom above all other men would want to control who lives or who dies. Someone who holds himself in high esteem would rather be productive and worry about his own life without trying to control others. Shaw was more of a parasite than a rational being imo.
Chaaarge 6 months ago
Go to Wikipedia and check out Shaw's Fabian Window and take a good look at the alumni list of his Fabian Socialist school - The London School Of Economics. The School says it wants to distance itself from Shaw's Fabian Socialist ideas, but his window championing the remolding of the world featuring a wolf in sheep's clothing is still on display in the George Bernard Shaw library
KaraokeJerry 1 year ago
Comment removed
KaraokeJerry 1 year ago
HE IS A DISGRACE TO THE HUMAN RACE
queenofcapitola 1 year ago 2
This guy creeps the hell out of me. Progressives know better now than to be so honest about their vision.
seraphlaim 1 year ago
@al1936 well if that is even true, and with tongue in cheek he calls repeatedly for gassing 'unproductive' people, doesnt that also present a problem? Its like someone continuously telling racist jokes. why would it be funny? And why should we believe your mask of sarcasm when you have repeated it so many times. perhaps the more important question is, if Shaw wasnt kidding would it matter to you? Would you then say he is a monster?
seraphlaim 1 year ago
"you have a good president and a bad Constitution." Hmm, that's kinda all you need to know about the guy isn't it.
seraphlaim 1 year ago
Fuck who let this guy live?
odin422 1 year ago
This guy was certainly a piece of excrement.
jtnoodle 1 year ago
shaw was a nazi
dovii4ever 1 year ago
I cannot tell how glad I am that all the other poets like Homer, Shakespeare, Euripides, Schiller, Molière or Goethe lived in an age where there was no television; and I hate to admit it (and it is your fault alone Monsieur Nietzsche for destroying all illusions about artists as brave heroic individuals, which stood against the world for the sake of beauty, wisdom, truth and their art as the incarnation of al this): But Shakespeare does look on his pictures to be the same kind of coxcomb!
FireEyedMaidOfWar 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Here's a man who should have been killed! If I were alive in his time... I would have gladly taken my pistol, put it against his temple and taken that scumbag out of the world. Everyone who loves or idolizes this man should also be killed.
PatriotsRepublic 1 year ago
Here's exactly the type of clown who keeps Fox News in business.
"grrr...he say bad thing! sarcasam? what be sarcasm? grrr...shoot head with pistol...watch glen beck"
ebeneezzer 1 year ago
Almost everything he says is tongue-in-cheek. You can see that. He always has a twinkle in his eye when he's being outrageous.
al1936ful 1 year ago
Abolish the Constitution??? Look what has happen just from stepping around it!!! The country is a freaking mess!!
ghendric 1 year ago
Abolish the Constitution??? Look what has happen just from stepping around it!!! The country is a freaking mess!!
ghendric 1 year ago
THis guy was a disgrace, he traveled to USSR in 1937 and saw Communist atrocities with his own eyes, but he had never mentioned that.
He was a liberastic hiena..
amper0003 1 year ago
This bad constitution protects us from big companies and countries that want to put us into servitude.
duvexy 1 year ago 3
If our constitution was used more we would have a lot less problems.Progressives are the disease.
Kelthuzad126 1 year ago 4
Great Irish sense of humour
breda83 1 year ago
HAHAHA good job biych
ManiaCs14789 1 year ago
It does matter. If the American left is idolizing him, they are essentially embracing a political philosophy of mass extermination.
stater68 1 year ago
Except for the fact that the American left isn't idolizing him.
Stop the Tea Party, stop the lies, stop the fear.
Shelter1284 1 year ago
hated or loved, he will be remembered and discussed longer than any of us on here, he was a genius you are not, doesn't matter whether or not he was evil
zeppelin2k 1 year ago 9
@zeppelin2k What the hell are you going on about! And 8 people have thumbed your comment up as well! Jesus you people are sick. It "doesn't matter whether or not he was evil". I can't believe you wrote those words and others agree with you! Unbelievable. Please tell me all 9 of you don't live in the UK?
annuity100 11 months ago
@annuity100 If a person figured out a way to cure humanity of all their illnesses, would it matter whether or not they were evil? Answer that for yourself first, then ask yourself: if someone was capable of that, could they even be considered evil in the first place? Open up your mind, or you will just be looking at trees for the rest of your life...
zeppelin2k 11 months ago
@zeppelin2k Mate stop making things worse by continuing to try and justify evil. Just go to fucking bed you sick twat.
annuity100 11 months ago
@annuity100 Seems I was right. When people are losing an argument and have nothing coherent to say the lesser minds usually resort to lashing out. You probably can't even state your reason for thinking that this video or the man himself was evil. And you used the word twat which we don't use here in the Americas, so I'm guessing you're the Brit who wished he was North American and that's what has got you wound up...
zeppelin2k 11 months ago
@zeppelin2k There is no argument. George Bernard Shaw is being serious, he's evil and so are you for supporting him. And would someone so intellectually superior as you claim to be really be arguing with someone on the youtube comments section. You share delusions of grandeur with George and it is disappointing the world has to suffer people like you who think they can dictate to others. Being smart does not automatically make you a nice human being. Enjoy your life and let others enjoy theirs.
annuity100 11 months ago
@annuity100 No matter how eloquent the words that is still a concede to defeat, to an argument you started in the first place I might add. An argument you probably presumed that you could win, then realized you were outmatched, outwitted, and outclassed in. I agree however (with your hypocritical statement) that people should not argue online, unless of course they have the mental capacity to constructively do so; so in your case you should refrain. Go watch the FOX News you hoople.
zeppelin2k 11 months ago
@zeppelin2k
same genius as Stalin and Hitler. the same grade of humanitarianism
toopeek 9 months ago
@zeppelin2k haha, you certainly make it self-evident that you are not a genius, and anyway if you are among the non-geniuses why does it matter what you say? If we are only to listen to the geniuses why should we listen to you? Putting someone beyond good and evil is simply a meaningless thing to say.
krane121 4 months ago
"Americans adore me and will go on adoring me until I say something nice about them."
Elnonopololo 1 year ago 9
well this was bettter than avitar
thesparewheel 1 year ago 3
is this him acting in scenes of plays ?
LaughOutLoudx33 1 year ago
Shaw was an ass
jdlewis60 1 year ago
typical psychopath, just listen to him.
all ego.
Envisionism 1 year ago
Bernard Shaw+Hitler=BUSH.
Jetman7777 2 years ago
@Jetman7777 ha dumbass
sliterturn1 2 years ago 2
That's just rude.
stater68 1 year ago
yeah screw the constitution... its totally unimportant... i hope he was joking.... again..... hah
egodevenio 2 years ago
arrogant prick . wonder who he reminds me of hmmm .....
butchbm39 2 years ago
I really wish he was here today so the faggot could get AIDS.
madisonelectronic 2 years ago
sick bastard
wat700son 2 years ago
"Socialism means equality of income or nothing... under socialism you would not be allowed to be poor. You would be forcibly fed, clothed, lodged, taught, and employed whether you like it or not. If it were discovered that you had not character enough to be worth all this trouble, you might possibly be executed in a kindly manner; but whilst you were permitted to live you would have to live well."
George Bernard Shaw - The Intelligent Woman's Guide to Socialism and Capitalism (1928) p470
chellow2 2 years ago 3
Abolish the Constitution? Wonder how many other leftists in American think this very same thing.
prplhze2000 2 years ago
Answer? ALL OF THEM
But the progressives have infiltrated both parties. It's not just the left anymore. The people that feel the way Shaw did are infesting the American political system from all avenues in all parties.
JCB1986b 1 year ago
How interesting!!
I live in a house that was lived in by Hans Richter conductor of the Halle Orchestra - and George Bernard Shaw stayed here as his guest !
Cool !!
Great video !!
jaaaaaayynnee 2 years ago
& I lived in Shaw's home Shaw's Corner for 8 years when I was Custodian of the property & slept in his bed ! Very very Coooool. Right on jaaaaayynnee.
ladyshaw777 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The american empire is DEAD, finish, will be more Humans and Brothers in a Socialist Sociaty. Good on You Bernard !!!!
AussieChe1 2 years ago
America made Shaw rich, but he never talks about that. I notice he never gave HIS money away, only other peoples'. You and Shaw belong together, poofter.
madisonelectronic 2 years ago
@AussieChe1, Do you even know about the man in your screenname? Ernesto "Che" Guevara, look up Barbara Rangel's testimony, you'll get an idea . . .
bingbingbum 2 years ago
bernard was a fool but now we have a world full of socialist idiots who follow his pathetic world view.
gnome33 2 years ago
Don't here any venomous remarks from GBS - they all seem to come from cyberspace!
tetrabiblos 2 years ago 2
Mark, look what you started. Its not easy to distinguish between when he was being serious or just outrageous for its own sake.
merrihew 3 years ago 4
Well, I just thought that we should see GBS 'objectively', despite his venomous remarks and other flaws. I am aware about Shaw's faults anyway.
transformingArt 3 years ago
If you want to have a discussion of philosophy, that is fine. But to call someone you don't even know names, from far away, in a text box is dehumanizing to both of us. Can't you see? That's exactly the attitude throughout history that has petrified humanity and kept us all from spiritually evolving beyond the need for money, war, and all of this greed and dread? I just don't know why people can't wake up and just be real with eachother. Its like, we're all so much the same... but so afraid...
DarkGodSunshineBand 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Our Constitution is the only thing that separated our great nation from the brutal oligarchy's and fascist regimes of Europe in the 20'th century. I wonder if Shaw would have anything to say about that now, from his grave, as he burns in Hell.
DarkGodSunshineBand 3 years ago
You're country was a European invention you American fuck-wit! Democracy, I think you'll find, is a Greek word. Now go eat your words while you re-examine what that gun-slinging yahoo you've called a president for the past 8 years has done in the middle east.
P.S Go fuck yourself!
DarKool81 3 years ago
HELLO-- Libertarian here, not Republican- We are the people against the war in Iraq, against American Imperialism, and the abolition (or at least full regulation) of the private central banking hierarchy responsible for funding all sides of all wars for the past 200 years. Get a clue. Believe it or not, not everyone here is for Isreal putting Palestinians in concentration camps, torture, detainment, and war. You don't need to use profanity. Our president is evil, not stupid. Obama, the same.
DarkGodSunshineBand 3 years ago
Fight globalism, not people. The war of ideas is much bigger than you and me. And Shaw did say those things. I am not making that up, though with a little research, its pretty obvious he tried to redeem himself later in life- referring to his earlier political beliefs as naive. Socialism COULD work, just as Democracy COULD work as well- it's just up to people to find a way to keep evil from rising to power as it has for centuries. Same story, history repeating itself...
DarkGodSunshineBand 3 years ago
Maybe you should follow Shaw's advice then.
DarKool81 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This man called for the death of millions of people. He supported Stalin and Hitler's rise to power. He was a Marxian socialist who believed in the systematic killing of "undesirables". He wrote that what the world needed was 'a humane gas that will kill instantly and painlessly'; and for the extermination of 'useless races' on a scientific bases.
"Hitler found exactly what Shaw had called for in the Zyklon-B gas with which he snuffed out the lives of six million Jews and other 'useless races.'
DarkGodSunshineBand 3 years ago