03 mustang gt 0-60 in 5.5

[southpaw7890]

Not feelin the whole Tron setup, but man does she purr.....

[MRmegaVideoz]

where can i get blinker fluid? i just changed out my muffler bearings to add a little torque ;)

[xstandifer92]

what dials do you have looks good.

[metallica58266]

wish i still had you :(

[este351w]

Very good id did flat 5sec 0-60

[yeahtone1992]

They add about 17-25 visual horsepower

[eskamokiller]

how do u know if your speedometer can go up to how fast you car actually goes?

[metallica58266]

@eskamokiller get on the highway top it out n see what your speedo and gps say if you have one cause most gps' will tell your current speed. I know mine was dead on , never had problems

[reaperschild1234]

Where did you get those gauges??? They look sick!!

[metallica58266]

@reaperschild1234 americanmuscle com i think they were $25

[highlanderhybrid]

I raced one of these in my modded Fusion V6 a while back, it was stock and was behind me only about .07 seconds. Pretty quick for 03" and stock

[highlanderhybrid]

I raced one of these not too long ago at the track

[Quatermain98526]

I recorded you going 0-60 in 5.3. Pretty quick for a GT.

[SuRihtanil]

@Quatermain98526 Faster than your LS1?

[Quatermain98526]

@SuRihtanil Haha. Check out my 0-90MPH video, I have stop watched it to about 5.2 or 5.3 seconds to 60. I know the Mustang GT can keep up with the LS1 pretty evenly to 60, but beyond that the LS1's greater HP curve takes over.

[SpliffdeBrownsville]

what's up with these idiots talking trash about the gauge cluster I got the same one and its dope I got bored of the stock...cobras and saleens are white during the day so I wanted mine to be the same but at night is where things got interesting

[OffTheWall158]

sweet guages

[MrHotrodlincoln]

Can we race? :-D

[burninrock24]

how much HP did the decals give you? ive heard anything from 12 to 15 with the right tune and conditions.

[metallica58266]

@burninrock24 wow you must be stupid or something cause decals dont give you horse power or maybe they i dunno

[burninrock24]

@metallica58266 youre an idiot. Of course decals dont add horsepower. go change your blinker fluid.

[metallica58266]

@burninrock24 oh snap i probably should thanks. how much hp you think i could get with racer blinker fluid???? my guess is around 1 or 2 which is a little more than your IQ, its called sarcasm dumbass.

[metallica58266]

@burninrock24 oh snap thanks for reminding me! how much hp you think ill get with racer blinker fluid? 1 or 2 maybe? which is about your IQ, its called sarcasm dumbass

[sl0wm03]

@burninrock24 damn, and i put all those stickers on my car for no reason

[lanesboro2012]

@burninrock24 i heard flames on the side of cars gives you more horsepower

[metallica58266]

@lanesboro2012 dont forget the hood too

[prosurfer2222]

@metallica58266 wow dude decals....lol ricerrrrr

[57swifty75]

@burninrock24 that only works on ricers dud...

[ezkill99]

@burninrock24 hahahahahahahahaha funny shit

[SuRihtanil]

@burninrock24 I don't see any decals? or do you mean the gauges?

[burninrock24]

@SuRihtanil read the description.

[SteWitch]

@burninrock24 fucker what type of car do u drrive? honda fit?

[burninrock24]

@SteWitch HAHA you assume because I'm having some fun with a mustang owner that I own an import? But no, I have a 96 GT convertible. Check me on the AllFordMustangs . com forums if you dont believe me...

[metallica58266]

@burninrock24 ok who cares?? no one. you own a mustang great thats awesome i think they are great cars and the SN95's are awesome. youre not cool though, who cares if i put decals on my car?

[burninrock24]

@metallica58266 Its a damn joke!!! I dont care if you have decals. I have a window sticker, and decals under my hood. Its just funny that you mentioned them in your description. It would make more sense if you had an exterior shot or did a walkaround. But its fairly out of place (and therefore funny) in the description of an acceleration video. Since nobody would tell either way if you had them or not since its not relevant. But SHIT. Im sorry if I've royally pissed you off about my damn joke.

[derby678]

Nice sound man!!

[BigThangsPoppinMayne]

hey i got the same exact car 03 mustang gt...same gauges...same intake K&N....n i timed myself but i didnt press the gas all the way in n i got like 9.5 seconds....is your car automatic?????? or stick??????

[metallica58266]

@BigThangsPoppinMayne hey man its an auto, but auto or stick a stock 99-04 gt runs 6 to 6.5 secs. ive noticed with that car (i dont own it anymore) if you dont floor it it dont really move. just floor it man lol if you got a stick make sure you shift right at redline

[knotajoker]

@BigThangsPoppinMayne my 01 gt did it in 6.7 so that doesnt make sense



[olgaa30]

good acceleration!

[xE4syComp4nyx]

Dude let your car warm up before you romp on it. Idiot

[MustangFord666]

yo i like that cluster!

[matthewrockslol22]

how much hp did those few decals, and LED taillights add..?

[whatthehallbetch]

@matthewrockslol22 50-100hp

[MangoSmoothie16]

Porsche did that in 87 with a N/A V8. Not impressive.

[Billoney87]

@MangoSmoothie16 Wait. You're telling me that a Porsche (which is several time the price of a mustang) is faster then a mustang! No Way! Oh and by the way. If bye N/A you mean natually aspirated, then this car is also N/A so I don't know what your trying to say...

[MangoSmoothie16]

@Billoney87 The 928 which can be found for less than 10k now did this time in 1987. Ford took until 2003 ish to match that? And I was saying the porsche was N/A as its a common misconception almost all porsches are forced induction.

[Billoney87]

@MangoSmoothie16 ever heard of the ford gt40? it was made in the 60s and won awards around the world. mustang gt500? gt350? these old cars would be much faster then a 5.5 sec 0-60

[MangoSmoothie16]

@Billoney87 So was the 911 turbo, 917. 5.5 isnt impressive. Ford made stuff faster than that obviously but it is the top of the line stuff unreachable by the public. Almost anyone can afford a 10 grand car. Most cant a 100k+ supercar or 50k plus classic.

[Billoney87]

@MangoSmoothie16 5.5 isnt anything crazy, i own one of these and it should run about the same (haven't gotten the chance to take it to a strip yet). But you are missing what I am trying to say. You said that it took ford untill 99-04 to make a car go 0-60 in 5.5 secs. I am merely saying that that statement is incorrect.

[MangoSmoothie16]

@Billoney87 oh. ok. Ford did it earlier than 99. That was idiotic for me to say

[whatthehallbetch]

@MangoSmoothie16 yeah, but thats a porshe....not a ford. big difference

[MangoSmoothie16]

@whatthehallbetch How? Porsche used a 5.0 V8. Ford had those in 87 I believe. The mustang vs 928 should have been a good battle when it came out. Instead the mustang was struggling with a little 2.5L twin cam 4cyl pushing a massive 180 bhp. Oh thats right. The ford 5.0 barely got over the 200hp mark...

[whatthehallbetch]

@MangoSmoothie16 but thats like comparing a new mustang to a panamara. theyre just not on the same level, no matter how you cut it. the porsche was expensive, the ford wasnt, the ford isnt gonna be as fast, handle as well, or anything like that compared to the porsche. thats like putting chevys 6.2 v8 against mercedes benz amg 6.2 v8, the merc is more expensive, more powerful, etc

[MangoSmoothie16]

@whatthehallbetch true true. But 200 hp was embarassing for a 5.0

[whatthehallbetch]

@MangoSmoothie16 but an emission regulation choked engine based on 50's technology, so considering that, 200hp wasnt much for a 302 4.9, but it wasnt pathetic either. these engines make torque, like musclecars should

[MangoSmoothie16]

@whatthehallbetch never looked at torque rating. If it's high torque then that would make sense. Im just being a troll.

[whatthehallbetch]

@MangoSmoothie16 ha! youre allowed. this is the internet after all

[MangoSmoothie16]

@whatthehallbetch good you see it that way. some people get pissed. you were being really cool.

[whatthehallbetch]

@MangoSmoothie16 hey, im just defending my car. there was no need for me to fly off the handle

[Nba2kballer]

WOw!

[Northwoods92]

WOW! Great run! Definately 5.5 Seconds if you use just the timer bar on the bottom of the screen! Nice! :D

[kyle88l]

that is one sexy sounding engine :D. very nice.

[Sk8FalIen]

everytime i watch a mustang vid on here i notice nobody has any gas why is that??

[ToddJamesForet]

@Sk8FalIen every bit of weight counts. more gas, more weight

[1brannon10]

Don't worry about the "haters" on your vid man! Great car and good run!

[metallica58266]

@1brannon10 thanks man!

[jdawgy87]

cough cough automatic

[JMF2479]

Those gauges def made that car faster

[mustangtimmy99]

crazyness!!!

[metallica58266]

@mustangtimmy99 thanks!

[mustangtimmy99]

CRAZYNESS!!!!

[mustangtimmy99]

two thumbs up!! good vid!!!

[mustangtimmy99]

TWO THUMBS UP!!!!

[iwanaGoFast2010]

those gauges are kick ass

[jarhead650]

what happens I thought that maybe 3 valaves would make a Mustang faster my 1995 Z28 has 2 valves and does 5.7 dead stock chevy still beats ford even with 1 valve less HA!!

[metallica58266]

@jarhead650 learn ur facts before bashin me guy! 99-04 gt's were 2 valve. the 3 valve didnt come in til 05. so our cars are pretty much dead even. so ha!

[Beldar4214]

@metallica58266 Not only that, but you have a 4.6... he has a 5.7... Whos engine sucks now?

[96StangGT91]

@metallica58266 that's awesome you just told the fuck out of that bitch ass nigga

[MangoSmoothie16]

@metallica58266 except for the 4th gen mach 1 ;) and n/a 4th gen cobra

[DwnNvr]

@jarhead650 except the new ss can't beat the new stang..

[danimal511]

@jarhead650 1 valve less but 69 cu in more

[acballa3369]

@jarhead650 In Tha Face!!!!!!

[nightfire1800]

@jarhead650 LOL lt1s couldnt outrun a v6. SHITS SLOW. i beat a built lt1 in my bolton 2v.

[pkidro]

@jarhead650 owned ROFL

[nightwing0707]

@jarhead650 you show be asking about the difference in litters between the chevy and the ford, not the difference in valves.

[whitesleeve0515]

eh tht doesnt seem very quick i would think a v8 mustang shld be able to run at least 5.2 not what it looks like 5.7-6 seconds to 60 mph

[metallica58266]

@whitesleeve0515 well a stock 99-04 GT runs 6.2 accroding to motortrend and my stock 03 ran a 5.7. pretty good if u ask me

[608gamer07]

@metallica58266 Motor Trend has a stock 99 going 5.4 0-60 and a 1/4 of 14.0. It says right in their article.

[leonardbullhock]

@608gamer07 accurate 0-60 times are a nightmare to get for these cars. i`ve read from 5.4 to 6.1 for a manual and 5.5 to 6.2 for an auto.

[608gamer07]

@leonardbullhock I always just go with the fastest. :/. I look at it this way, if one guy did it then another guy can do it. But it has to be apples to apples. Different transmissions do different things and etc.

[tbirdsport302]

i like the gauges, very nice

[wickedblackcamaro]

id like to get a gt mustang to replace my 88 camaro, either that or a truck.

[Panchini]

dude he did it right , to all the people who talk shit buy a mustang first and stop driving your gay card from the 80's , the stock version goes from 0-60 in 5.3 seconds he didnt use a racing clock

[kcole939]

Metallica58266, did you have another in-car acceleration video, where there was an Autometer Cobalt tach?

I'm trying to find this video that I watched again. It had the neatest looking tachometer ever. Maybe you know which video I'm talking about.

I hate making noob-ish comments like this, I feel like a spammer. Haha.

[vietnamrebel]

Nice 'Stang!! Was this automatic or manual? Shifted so nicely I couldn't tell!

[Cschoening091]

auto

[metallica58266]

@vietnamrebel yea its an auto

[marcomariaz26]

seems faster than 5.5...

[metallica58266]

5.5 was just an est. in my head. its actually 5.34 on a stopwatch

[marcomariaz26]

sweet.

[plane45036]

5.72 man

[KarlT01]

yeah, like stop watch is accurate . LMAO

[Sforschondetta]

u have the DOHC cluster gaguges. i have the same one cuz evidently they dont make sohc ones

[metallica58266]

yea its stupid but i dont mind i plan on camming it and supercharging it anyways

[COD4dude28]

nice!

[bmgilge]

very fast, nice gauges too!

[ghost1103]

your gauges are sick....nice stang!

[HKuspDADDY]

nice guages. my 2000 is a little quicke i think my video was about 5 flat

[johnnydig552]

Nice!

[metallica58266]

sorry theres a typo in the description! i ran on 93 octane gas not 89! i normally run 89 but been using 93 for the past couple of weeks! sorry!

[Domman56]

Ah ok yeah definately but if you run 100 octane you gotta know run half 93 and half 100 octane otherwise it can do some bad stuff to your car

[metallica58266]

yea i've never used it, i normally just throw in racing fuel additives to 91 or 93 octane if i race. i normally use turbo 108 racing octane boost which 1 bottle per half tank of gas increases octane by about 4.

i went to the track a couple time with no mods and ran a stock time on 93 octane of 14.522. my next time i threw in a half tank of 91 and 2 bottles of turbo and ran a 14.128 completely stock

[Domman56]

Haha nice i can't wait to use octane booster in my el camino

[Domman56]

Run the Shell V power 91 octane, makes your car perform great

[metallica58266]

yea i heard thats great gas but there is no shell station any where around where i live so i just go with sunoco 89 octane and 93 octane if i want performance. or i could stop at delta sonic and grab some 100 octane racing fuel lol

[Linktheworld]

Dude, I think mine is just a little quicker. You know what really helped was get a coil on plug kit and an aluminum driveshaft. On one trip to the auto shop I put those on, with the slotted ( lighter ) brakes and a sct xcaliber 2 chip and tune and my car was a lot faster.

Check out my vids.

It is an auto and I catch second gear!

[HKuspDADDY]

Mine has a new motor 0.30 over, K&N, Flowmaster 40's, no cats and a tune, it lights 275/40/17's up when it hits second. My 0-60 video is right at 5 flat. I also have a video of me almost lossing it on a second gear shift, i feather it through 1st then when it hits second it almost puts me in the ditch on the othe side of the road, but i saved it. I will post that video if you would like to see

[Linktheworld]

damn, were you tires going bald? Yeah put that video up, sounds like a nice save!

[HKuspDADDY]

nope new tires, it would hit a good second before but the new motor just has a little more pep to it. Like i said its a rebuild thats been punched 30, but it has a 100 thousand mile warenty. I dont know if it has more power simply because its new or if 0.030 over makes that big a diff on a 4.6, i dont really know much about muastangs im a gm guy that got a good deal on a ford. I will post the video,

[flyerholland]

sounds alot like a crown vic :)

[metallica58266]

thanks! mustangs, crowns, grand marqs, and lincoln continentals all came with pretty much the same engine. they are all 4.6L modular engines w/ small differences. i had a 2000 continental once with the 275 hp 270 tq 4.6 and that car would have been quick as hell if it didnt weigh 4100 lbs.

[flyerholland]

yea..! i know! but its weird actually if u think about it! anyway i also have to say.. those ar some asesome cluster gauges !

[metallica58266]

i didnt stop watch this yet but my guess is around 5.5! i know its an auto but i dont care. not bad for my only mod being a k&n intake. other than that its a stock GT.