What I don't understand is, the SR-71 Blackbird can fly to the edge of space, right? But apparently it's not equipped to actually leave our atmosphere - mostly due to concerns over pressure, etc.
Why don't they just build another plane, like a modern version of the SR-71 but equipped to leave our atmosphere and travel through space? Surely it'd be simpler than getting to space in an overgrown firework?
Perhaps after the initial R&D it would be cheaper and less wasteful too. Add VTOL and voila.
I wish that was true. If your right, then we would have these technologys in Case of an emergency. Waht do you mean with secret wars? A Stargate Scenario? It´s true most of our tech is still from WW2. Could you provide additional proof of your theories? Seroiusly such things need a better footing, if you want to convince somebody. I can´t belive you yet.
another thing is people forget to realize that nasa is all for show, the government has the highly advanced technology hidden from public view, all the ufos you see are infact ours, capable of traveling thousands of mph, noiseless, and have antigravity capable of traveling out of our atmosphere to other planets such as mars. reason why nasa hasnt changed much is because all the funding is going into black projects, secrets wars, government wants us to stick to old tech, keep us in the dark
@AgrivatedKillah because i have seen it before, no one will fuckn believe me! my dad works for this secret agency thats not part of the government, not part of any government. he doesnt talk about it much because well you know why, but he always says if people find out what they have going on, it would completely change the world, religion, politics and people! hes not the head of the project, hes just the mechanic, but he knows what their doing in there. IM JUST KIDDING I DONT KNOW LOL!
@AgrivatedKillah well, that sucks that you havent seen it before, most people havent. only a a few thousand has really seen these crafts. ignorance is bliss, just cause you think its not real doesnt mean it isnt, just like santa claus, hes real
@AgrivatedKillah ok, your getting all technical, i can see your one of those assholes who like to put down people because of petty jealousy of not seeing it for yourself
its old tech, but then again, all the things we use even today to send people and cargo up into space is the same concept such as chemical rockets used during ww2 era and early moon landing. the tech hasnt changed and probably will not change for along time, until we build either a space elevator or build a aircraft that can fly into space and back with no additional rockets attached to the plane
I was expecting badass ships and a cool looking lander. but no its still gold foil and a rocket all fucked up together. Couldn't they make a new shuttle but more better I myself already know what I want it to look like.
NASA has become a navel-gazing organization more focused on the Earth than space. My bet is that the primitive rocket in this video will never launch.
Very nice graphics but the technology is ancient. I hope NASA doesn't expect us to believe that the next generation of space vehicles will be powered by these stick in a bottle rocket systems. The REAL space program is by now many decades ahead of this primitive stuff.
Richard Hoagland reckons NASA stands for Never A Straight Answer and I'm afraid I must agree with him.
We do not hate America, as a matter of fact we do not hate american's too. It is a good thing that someone still continue to research natzi rocket program. We just don't like when someone says that he(or they) have done something when he instead (or they) didn't do nothing. When i see a US rocket, I see a modified V2 rocket. And if U didn't know who is a creator of US rocket program, it is a inventor of V2 rocket Wernher von Braun. When U invent something by yourself, then U will be honored!
@Ja2so4 That shows what you know. Wernher von Braun was an American citizen when he participated in the development of all of our space vehicals. That is one of the reasons our country is better than yours. You only need to share our ideals to be one of us, not our bloodline. Some bloodlinecentric nation gets a hold of a genious like von Braun and they waste him trying to exhault thier bloodline. We explore the solar system.
Forget the moon as well becuase you can't terraform it. Mars coukld be terraformed only because it has an amosphere and has a similar tilt. Tho this technology seems didtant. This is an illsion many countries make.
They should really focus on getting an Epiditionary Unit to Alpha Centauri . Shit that's where the real money is oh and Astroids. For that mattter i say that our next step is to invent terraforming and as well light speed. Both will be easily acheivable if mankind can just stfu for once.
@SuperColonel77 And you keep going; with increasingly lamer posts. What's next? It couldn't be more pathetic than "Retard" followed by ellipses could it?
@monokhem It gets worse................Some ego ou have there my good man. Ugh let me watch my videos in peace. Plus you know you can go suck a dickthats a little less lame for you eh?Dont keep responding cuz youll just fill the damn page.
@SuperColonel77 Unimpressive. I'm not sure exactly how I was hindering your enjoyment of a long cancelled space program, but it isn't like you have tried to make sense so far.
@monokhem Anyway I know your into Nasa and so am I. Would you say going to Alpha Centauri in the next say 60 years could be a reality? Also when do you think the moon and the Red Planet will be colonized by hUMANS?
@monokhem In about 50 years metals like nickel ironetc. will be gone from the Earth in fact asteroids crashed onto the earth years ago more like billions of years ago with iron etc, Our next move should be to start mining asteroids safely and at a low cost.
@SuperColonel77 I wouldn't count on it being safe or at low cost, but concidering that one asteroid has enough precious metals in it to cover the national debt I think we will be mining asteroids soon. I think that is what Obama was pushing with his NEO landing. That would be the first step to pulling that off.
@monokhem Also I'm glad they cancelled this shit. Rocket Tech like this is very Apollo like. Time to go back to the Physics lab on new rocket types say Nucler Fusion Rockets or a Vasimr rocket or even an Anti Matter Rocket but this all takes time.Do you know the 3 types of civiltions?We are a type 0 civilization because we use dead plants and other fossil fuels for energy. In 100 years we willbe a type 1 that uses the entire energy of a planet.I bet you knew this.
@SuperColonel77 Don't get to exited. Altair is gone but the next rocket they have planned is going to be this rearanged because congress won't let any company that has a rocket contract not get a new one. Apollo tech was much better for what they are doing here. This is shuttle tech missused as Apollo tech.
@monokhem True,if you look at how quickly technology progresses and if the cold war still was raging and a space race with it we would have these type of technolygies. And i agree but however if we are going to colonize the moon in the next 50 years hell ill be 64 lol.If you loook at technology in this year. We could be well on our way to a Mars mission in 20 years.Hey I still have that question about intersellar spaceflight on my last comment.
@SuperColonel77 I don't think we will see the beggining of intersteller travel in our life time. I'm prretty exited about our own solar system. Everything we want from space travel exept intellegent life is readiliy available here. If we gave NASA the buget of the Afghanistan war we could be at mars in ten years. I think vasimir could be ready in as little as a decade clearing the way for ruitine trips to Mars, mining of the asteroid belt, and the begginings of Colonies on the gas giants moons.
Looks like N.A.S.A. is taking the "if it ain't broke don't fix it" approach to the moon program. Use a tried and tested space vehicle, with updated software.
Multistage rocket, command capsule, and moon lander. It should work out fine and save money on trying to develop some new type of delivery system.
NASA hahahah ridiculous tecnology much much money for a stupid and ridicolus tecnology you american are very stupid the future fpr the new space ship tecnology belongs to Asian countries especialy INDIA and CHINA whit collaboration ITALY and JAPAN italian have new tipe of chemical fuel for navy space ship.
@Xilon10 And those country's have walked on the moon how many times And its spelled :T-e-c-h-n-o-l-o-g-y,Who is stupid now ,Dont fuckin crack on Americans We along with the russians own space and have the most success, but I tell you what we will need Asians for what we needed them for in the west,A good laugh,To build railroads and to cook and clean!So dont you ever insult Americans again because your jealous cause your country sucks
@Xilon10 WTF do you think you are. You are one dumbass guy who just hates America. Your a fucking little cunt when it comes to knowing what the hell your talking about . You DUMB BASTARD.Ihave met some dumb bastards in my time but you outweigh them all. Hey you dumb fuck spell shit right for once. You ASIAN TRASH Motherfucker!!!!
I don't know how humanity is going to space with a disposable rocket program? If this system could be re-used; I wouldn't squawk... but this system is more about launching and landing.... not interplanetary travel. We spend more on abandoning designs than we do building and running working craft. There is sufficient talent and technology to solve this... I think NASA needs to do what it does best... bold challenges... Half step programs puttering on government approval is going to kill NASA!
@granddad2002 couldn't agree with you more they need to build reusable decent sized eloctrmagnetically shileded spacecraft that stay in space- maybe parked in a moon base with a slingshot launcher or orbit the moon -and make good spacestations and get a new surface to space and vice virsa rocket or something better than a rocket - if they can then the long range ships at them moon could go where they like a lot faster!! - we should have all sorts with our tech but they spend it all on "defence"
ya no one really has it right other than sir Richard branson their space ship uses a hyrid rocket but it is a horizontil takeoff and also is about the sise of a short bus so it is kindof like a shuttle
@storminmormin14 Richard branson's Virgin galactic is just a tourist vehical to get rich people a few minutes of micro gravity. it doesn't even reach orbit. it's of no value in an exploration capacity. The mercury program went further.
Okay well this isn't really "future technology" well not to any extream this is like technology we already have but don't bother doing cause its either to expensive or cause there is nothing to scientifically gain from doing such things.
Rocket technology? This looks alot like the Apollo lunar modules . NASA needs more funding from participating countries, its a travesty that we are heavily invested in fossil fuels and war, when exploration and alternative energy sources should be our most important endeavors.
they should either send a ship or a probe or something, to gliese 581 g or alpha centauri, or what ever its name is. Im bored of mars,.... well just bored of our solar system..
@Tonystarkes888 to travel at speed of light you don't need to travel. You need to bend space around you literally and takes the energy of a star and it must be the volume of Jupiter.
@MyPenis13inchGirlFit Jupiter Island is full of pleasures Glowing gardens holding hidden treasures Luminous flowers of yellows and greens Glittering petals that have to be seen Here's your chance don't let it pass you by Take my hand and we'll fly Jupiter Island is surrounded by oceans Majestic ballerinas with graceful motions Magenta forests on a crimson sea The electric clouds ar as vivid as can be Scarlet moons in a domino sky Take my hand and we'll fly Come on let's fly to Jupiter Island
@MyPenis13inchGirlFit the band is Porcupine Tree, the song title is Jupiter Island, it is wat aliens have on there ipods when they cruise deep space :)
we're never going to mars. we're never going to travel further into space than the moon. Want to know why? because we're all scared, and our technology is fucking horrible.
we're never going to mars. we're never going to travel further into space than the moon. Want to know why? because we're all scared, and our technology is fucking horrible.
we're never going to mars. we're never going to travel further into space than the moon. Want to know why? because we're all scared, and out technology is fucking horrible.
@zomgwtfbbqbagel Our technology is horrible? We've had the technology to go to Mars for decades. Furthermore, we are not scared, you may be, but humanity is not. Its attitudes like yours that would have caused the Americas from never being discovered, deemed powered flight "impossible" and thus a waste of time or impossible to go to the moon, but we did. If we never try, we never go anywhere, and if we never go anywhere, no progress is made. Cowardice is not a substitute for innovation.
@NelielTuOderswank Nasa is a front for the real deal, and a tax right off, to waist money on primitive techno- and rocket fosil fuels, when the alien craft, are already flying through space and time. oh yes we already been to mars,, and way beyond that, i do believe.
Gus grissom and his two other fellow crew perished in the first test. You gotta assume these new rockets will be safer. Stop the Iraq war, save the bucks, and it all comes together by 2010 for return to moon (and back ;)
People, we could build all kinds of rocket,spaceship,go to the mar,etc, but there are one main issue:money. We are in a recession right now and we are dead broke. 20 percent of the taxes money we paid go to paid just the interest of the loan uncle sam borrow. So the next 10-20 years don't expect any fancy thing coming from nasa. Shit, nasa is lucky socialist obama didn't cut deeper than he wanted. Had he has his way, nasa would be a temporary museum.Truth hurt!
@nbsbb2009 Calling Obama a socialist and saying hes cutting down NASA? I cannot even fathom your bigotry. NASA is receiving an addition 6 billion USD under the Obama administration, the only thing changing is where the money is being spent. Constellation is being scrapped to be substituted for a much cheaper shuttle derived launch system, which in turn will be taking us to the moon, asteroids, and ultimately Mars by 2030.
wtf is this,60 years since apollo and we are still going back to the fucking moon,if the money used in the iraq war is used to invest on this instead,we would probably be on mars now,Damn there are so many other techs for space travel,like build a space elevator which is possible now thanks to carbon nanotubes,go read up on it and ships powered by solar sails,nuclear pulse propulsion,nuclear fusion.Heck there is even an equation for WARP DRIVES,u think those govt monkeys even have a brain.......
They should watch more stargate atlantis or something.
No seriously, why don't they use other technologie like splitting atoms?
Or building a moon suplier base and schoot from there to differend places witch we can't visit now because its 2 far.
Make a chain of suply bases or do something with wireless power transportation, catch energie from the sun and shoot it wireless troughout spaceships that uses it to fly.
Or build a gigantic slingshot and then shoot from the moon.
@Stanna5x Dude, Splitting atoms only makes a bomb. Splitting atom doesn't work. Why else do we have nuclear bombs? What you want nuclear powered ships that destroys environment of the planet? Read Nuclear Fission.
really? this is what you have for us? still burning fuel to get to space and parachutes for landing? you might as well say you guys are stuck in the 60's
really? we are taking ten steps back..... we should not even be using fuel for take off, nor using parachutes for landing, are you kidding me???????????????
Wouldn't it be possible to make a capsule that doesn't leave trash on the moon and in space orbiting the earth? i mean theres already so much space trash orbiting the earth that its get more and more difficult to launch satellite..?
@BrazillianFOsho thats why obama is trying 2 make space travel a public business.. then the price will go down, for instance... there are already several prototypes being built by several different companys... and they apparently can take people or cargo into orbit for way cheaper then nasa and their expensive shuttles... that virgin mobile guy will be selling trips to orbit for 200 000 dollars a seat starting in 2012, nasa spends about 15-20 million sending a single astronaught to ISS
NOW LOOK HERE, we all wanna see some anti-gravity Star Trek type shit ASAP and I'm sure it is possible, but I doubt anyone here is enough of an expert on any of the required subject matter to be able to say whether or not this rocket is a piece of crap. Who knows, maybe this is still the most cost effective way to get shit into orbit. anyway it's all about the space elevator
It's just a massive insult to the intelligence of an aware populace. Those that don't know any different are already out of the loop.
They expect us to believe this crap is the best that they can do when most savvy interested parties know something about electro-gravitic propulsion systems. Go google the pics for Aurora project SR-91. This is as painful as watching a fucking B-movie.
I wish NASA would stop treating us like fucking idiots.
I hope this fucking piece of shit falls on the bastards.
....too much noise, too much smoke, too much hardware. C'mon Earthlings, is this best your rocket-science can offer??? I dont suppose you have Fred Flintsone aboard do ya? Sheeeesh!!
"Shhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!! Earthlings, can you keep it down a little. We are trying to get some sleep......" (message from the planet Xorba on the other side of the Solar system)
ih looks lame, but there is many technolgy put in and this spacecraft is mach more progresive than its look like,,
for all the anty gravity syfy fans.. :D
I have seen an ufo two times in my life.. one time I was 7 and the other time I was drinking bear with my cousin.. we saw it bouth, so it was there..
I dont belive in green man, but if there are ufos somewhere, than the technology what is going to dewelop from this lame spacecraft has real potention..
@kalvishkungs18 it still costs ten grand a pound to put something in orbit. that is not effective cost benefit relations. until such time as its feasible to have open space tourism, and mining jobs on the moon, don't hold your breath on anything useful.
Arthur C. Clarke wrote a book about space elevators, but I am not sure we have any material strong enough to make the rope for the elevator and if we do we cannot make it in enough quantities/quality. A space elevator can only get you into orbit anyway, some type of propulsion system will be needed to explore the rest of the solar system.
we have got to get past rockets there just to slow. we need a new propultion system what are they doing at NASA building a new rocket .There must be a better way .Just think all that money spent on wars what it could do for the space program its just so sad.
Sorry to change the subject but this is space-related.
To see a partial summary of the clear evidence that the Apollo moon missions were faked, google "The Naked Scientists". In the "New Theories" section of the forum there's a thread entitled "Did We Land on the Moon?". The summary is on page 15. It's the 7th one from the top.
Once people have seen the hoax evidence, there's nothing anyone can do to make them believe we went to the moon.
there is no sound in space so why can i hear the rocket engine in space?
and it is not an embarrassment we have not been back to the moon. no matter how advanced technology gets, the escape velocity of earth remains the same and technology cannot grow exponentially forever.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Does anybody really believe that we haven't developed better flight technology beyond the primitive rocket, 50 years after Apollo 11? FUCK YOU N.A.S.A. . YOU ARE NOTHING BUT LIARS AND AN EMBARRASSMENT TO THE TRUTH. (N.A.S.A.) ... NEVER A STRAIGHT ANSWER.
I hear ya, Never A Straight Answer. They have most certainly developed in secret, craft way better than this crap ,which is going backwards.They have classified space programs that use anti gravity or electromagnetic propulsion that I myself have seen these craft several times. NASA is just a public smokescreen to hide the real programs.They have already been to Mars and other planets in the solar system. NASA knows the truth ,and its job is to hide it.They do release small amounts of truth.
@tpsossff Well from my porch I was several of them, they glow really bright white or orange at times. They hover or move around. At night I look up and keep my eye in the sky for a while and can see several of the same craft flying out in space. They change speed and direction,and a few I saw came to a complete stop. I see them fly across the sky very fast and in formation at times. They also just appear out of nowhere like you see from the footage of several shuttle missions.I see the same thg.
Why would they hide the existance of these futuristic space craft?
If there really is what can be described as a space drive (no thrust) why the secrecy when the technology could be used to make an unmanned mission to another star and return in a few years?
Such a space drive would not necessarily be any good for lifting stuff into space so the big rockets will always be needed.
@tpsossff Actually Rockets are inefficient and not need at all. NASA is a smokescreen to hide the real programs that are mainly military. Anti gravity /electromagnetic propulsion is far superior to rockets. These craft use quantum mechanics .The extreme osculation of electromagnetic energy causes mass to become less mass, so very little propulsion is needed to move at extreme speeds. The drive also protects from cosmic radiation.This is secret,why? it would free mankind from centralized control.
@MrRieser No Joke, I just saw more of them 2 nights ago ,and my neighbor across the street who thought I was crazy that I saw these things, came out and saw them with me. Just like footage from the space shuttle you can find clips of on here... The space shuttle ,and crap like this is not how you travel through space quickly ,safely ,and efficiently ...Electromagnetic anti gravity gives you all that, and protects occupants from cosmic rays. :)
@snlker dude we have never been to mars and NASA isn't a smokescreen because any other projects would have been discovered by now. Also, wouldn't it be weird if nasa launched different spacecraft than just the shuttle. People would get suspicous
@MrCallofdutyman Dude , YES WE HAVE!! :) They do not blast out with anti gravity. They just fly out, and for the most part unnoticed . I have seen them several times with witnesses .There are pics from their own data bases that show civilization on Mars,as well as life. NASA IS a smokescreen , and pathetic. The real programs are far far more advanced ,and Rockets are NOT the way to travel in space... Break out of the box my friend...we are lied to !!
Look out man in the Moon, NASA's on the way back :D
MrAndy9572ac 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NASA faked the moon landings. Here's a link to some of the evidence.
spurstalk (dot) com/forums/showthread (dot) php?t=144487
Cosmored 1 week ago
What I don't understand is, the SR-71 Blackbird can fly to the edge of space, right? But apparently it's not equipped to actually leave our atmosphere - mostly due to concerns over pressure, etc.
Why don't they just build another plane, like a modern version of the SR-71 but equipped to leave our atmosphere and travel through space? Surely it'd be simpler than getting to space in an overgrown firework?
Perhaps after the initial R&D it would be cheaper and less wasteful too. Add VTOL and voila.
MiG2880 3 weeks ago
Very nice example.
Mr40life40 1 month ago
saturn 5 on steroids
4d616c65737469636b 1 month ago
go
lwkmkam 2 months ago
I GUESS NASA TOOK THE JOHNNY WALKER ADS SERIOUSLY
Lostinpanama 2 months ago
Weak..... NASA = FAIL
yuppiekiller 3 months ago
@yuppiekiller Don't blame nasa..blame the government as well.
NASA could of developed a nuclear space craft that went 12% the speed of light... but it was canceled.
AgrivatedKillah 2 months ago
Unfortunately, that won't happen this way. The USA is broken. Maybe China will pursue that mission.
237Michael 3 months ago
This is a backward technology! WTF NASA type people, run out of ideas?
Anonymous7877 3 months ago
they should keep the shuttle but just release a new generation. a faster,safer and more reliable space shuttle.
dominicanodeDios 3 months ago
Have NASA animators forgotten the one cardinal rule of SFX: in space, no one can hear your engines firing?
Damn, the Ares looks top-heavy...
EVAUnit4A 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Want's to get on board...
MrMyspace6 4 months ago
@juki0h
I wish that was true. If your right, then we would have these technologys in Case of an emergency. Waht do you mean with secret wars? A Stargate Scenario? It´s true most of our tech is still from WW2. Could you provide additional proof of your theories? Seroiusly such things need a better footing, if you want to convince somebody. I can´t belive you yet.
DarkPatricius 5 months ago
another thing is people forget to realize that nasa is all for show, the government has the highly advanced technology hidden from public view, all the ufos you see are infact ours, capable of traveling thousands of mph, noiseless, and have antigravity capable of traveling out of our atmosphere to other planets such as mars. reason why nasa hasnt changed much is because all the funding is going into black projects, secrets wars, government wants us to stick to old tech, keep us in the dark
juki0h 5 months ago
@juki0h if they have it hidden from view.
HOW THE FUCK WOULD YOU KNOW?
AgrivatedKillah 4 months ago
@AgrivatedKillah because i have seen it before, no one will fuckn believe me! my dad works for this secret agency thats not part of the government, not part of any government. he doesnt talk about it much because well you know why, but he always says if people find out what they have going on, it would completely change the world, religion, politics and people! hes not the head of the project, hes just the mechanic, but he knows what their doing in there. IM JUST KIDDING I DONT KNOW LOL!
juki0h 4 months ago
@juki0h You're an idiot.. no offense.
Anti gravity? Really?
Of course we can travel to mars, we've already been there[well probes] have been there using chemical rockets]
Also, most of the black projects have been exposed.
AgrivatedKillah 2 months ago
@AgrivatedKillah well, that sucks that you havent seen it before, most people havent. only a a few thousand has really seen these crafts. ignorance is bliss, just cause you think its not real doesnt mean it isnt, just like santa claus, hes real
juki0h 2 months ago
@juki0h Yeah..because you know so much and we don't.
And traveling thousand of miles per hours isn't a big deal... most jets do that daily.
Noiseless as in what? Most transfer of energy is going to make a noise.
Also, explain anti gravity?
How can something be anti gravity when gravity is what shapes planets, and attracts objects together?
Think before you speak.
AgrivatedKillah 2 months ago
@AgrivatedKillah ok, your getting all technical, i can see your one of those assholes who like to put down people because of petty jealousy of not seeing it for yourself
juki0h 2 months ago
its old tech, but then again, all the things we use even today to send people and cargo up into space is the same concept such as chemical rockets used during ww2 era and early moon landing. the tech hasnt changed and probably will not change for along time, until we build either a space elevator or build a aircraft that can fly into space and back with no additional rockets attached to the plane
juki0h 5 months ago
Comment removed
juki0h 5 months ago
Pretty dam COOL!!
yo45671 5 months ago
rocket at 2:03 looks like a fucking cigarette and the CN tower combined
101101101777 5 months ago
so in others words same craptacular tech
101101101777 5 months ago
man this looks like some ww2-star fox mixed shizz lol but it worked before so if it aint broke dont fix it eh?
121fordfussion 5 months ago
ihmo the USA should sell this plans to China, because they have the money to build it...
AFN1991 6 months ago
@AFN1991 FUCK CHINA, FUCK THE POH-LEECE!
fucktardickis 5 months ago
@AFN1991 no, the chinese would copy and screw every one.
mariamole011 5 months ago
@mariamole011 IS MADE BY CHINESE
solo2004 5 months ago
@solo2004 they copy, they dont ake it.
mariamole011 5 months ago
I was expecting badass ships and a cool looking lander. but no its still gold foil and a rocket all fucked up together. Couldn't they make a new shuttle but more better I myself already know what I want it to look like.
LouieLouieification 6 months ago
NASA has become a navel-gazing organization more focused on the Earth than space. My bet is that the primitive rocket in this video will never launch.
zoyclem 6 months ago 2
60 years and all they've done is polish the metal....bullshit. This is embarrassing to humanity.
HedgehogStudios1 6 months ago
Only in America do people complain about a canceled space craft being outdated.
brizihe 6 months ago 2
helium sun atomic plasma is the fuel of the future
etrax2000 6 months ago
What a load of backward stepping tuut!
xoio 6 months ago
looks like the wont be makin them cuz nasa is shuttin down
haza312 6 months ago
Very nice graphics but the technology is ancient. I hope NASA doesn't expect us to believe that the next generation of space vehicles will be powered by these stick in a bottle rocket systems. The REAL space program is by now many decades ahead of this primitive stuff.
Richard Hoagland reckons NASA stands for Never A Straight Answer and I'm afraid I must agree with him.
TelecasterLPGTop 6 months ago
space is a bunch of B.S
roydora 6 months ago
Back to the 1960s!?!?!? WTF - this just shows the moon landings were bullshit!
itsradical 7 months ago
Virtually no advance over what we already have. What's the point?
JeffersonDinedAlone 7 months ago
Like how there is just one guy clapping..
kirza94 7 months ago
still as primative as ever
ACDCBrock123 7 months ago
wow it must be the most amazing thing to do, visiting space, to see moon, planets etc
djmusicjac 7 months ago
القط وتمساح من الغالب
7kopfDrache 7 months ago
We do not hate America, as a matter of fact we do not hate american's too. It is a good thing that someone still continue to research natzi rocket program. We just don't like when someone says that he(or they) have done something when he instead (or they) didn't do nothing. When i see a US rocket, I see a modified V2 rocket. And if U didn't know who is a creator of US rocket program, it is a inventor of V2 rocket Wernher von Braun. When U invent something by yourself, then U will be honored!
Ja2so4 7 months ago
@Ja2so4 That shows what you know. Wernher von Braun was an American citizen when he participated in the development of all of our space vehicals. That is one of the reasons our country is better than yours. You only need to share our ideals to be one of us, not our bloodline. Some bloodlinecentric nation gets a hold of a genious like von Braun and they waste him trying to exhault thier bloodline. We explore the solar system.
monokhem 7 months ago
Good old nazi tech
ObnoxiousRecuts 7 months ago 28
@ObnoxiousRecuts more like good old sophisticated German engineering
ekscholl 7 months ago
@ObnoxiousRecuts VFR tech - years before the Nazis.
edgeeffect 6 months ago
wow ww2 technology
supertec07 8 months ago 12
Looks like a step backwards in space for NASA!
lionpunk1WWE 8 months ago
Forget the moon as well becuase you can't terraform it. Mars coukld be terraformed only because it has an amosphere and has a similar tilt. Tho this technology seems didtant. This is an illsion many countries make.
SuperColonel77 8 months ago
They should really focus on getting an Epiditionary Unit to Alpha Centauri . Shit that's where the real money is oh and Astroids. For that mattter i say that our next step is to invent terraforming and as well light speed. Both will be easily acheivable if mankind can just stfu for once.
SuperColonel77 8 months ago
Fuck nASA SpaceX should take over they have better technology am i right?
SuperColonel77 8 months ago
@SuperColonel77 No.
monokhem 7 months ago
@monokhem I could give a shit!I posted that a month ago!
SuperColonel77 7 months ago
@SuperColonel77 But you still care enough to resond. Some ego you have there.
monokhem 7 months ago
@monokhem *Enjoy the video*.Retard....
SuperColonel77 7 months ago
@SuperColonel77 And you keep going; with increasingly lamer posts. What's next? It couldn't be more pathetic than "Retard" followed by ellipses could it?
monokhem 7 months ago
@monokhem It gets worse................Some ego ou have there my good man. Ugh let me watch my videos in peace. Plus you know you can go suck a dickthats a little less lame for you eh?Dont keep responding cuz youll just fill the damn page.
SuperColonel77 7 months ago
@SuperColonel77 Unimpressive. I'm not sure exactly how I was hindering your enjoyment of a long cancelled space program, but it isn't like you have tried to make sense so far.
monokhem 7 months ago
@monokhem Anyway I know your into Nasa and so am I. Would you say going to Alpha Centauri in the next say 60 years could be a reality? Also when do you think the moon and the Red Planet will be colonized by hUMANS?
SuperColonel77 7 months ago
@SuperColonel77 We will colonize the moon as soon as we make it profitable, mars when we make it feasable for less then 20 billion or so a year.
monokhem 7 months ago
@monokhem In about 50 years metals like nickel ironetc. will be gone from the Earth in fact asteroids crashed onto the earth years ago more like billions of years ago with iron etc, Our next move should be to start mining asteroids safely and at a low cost.
SuperColonel77 7 months ago
@SuperColonel77 I wouldn't count on it being safe or at low cost, but concidering that one asteroid has enough precious metals in it to cover the national debt I think we will be mining asteroids soon. I think that is what Obama was pushing with his NEO landing. That would be the first step to pulling that off.
monokhem 7 months ago
@monokhem Also I'm glad they cancelled this shit. Rocket Tech like this is very Apollo like. Time to go back to the Physics lab on new rocket types say Nucler Fusion Rockets or a Vasimr rocket or even an Anti Matter Rocket but this all takes time.Do you know the 3 types of civiltions?We are a type 0 civilization because we use dead plants and other fossil fuels for energy. In 100 years we willbe a type 1 that uses the entire energy of a planet.I bet you knew this.
SuperColonel77 7 months ago
@SuperColonel77 Don't get to exited. Altair is gone but the next rocket they have planned is going to be this rearanged because congress won't let any company that has a rocket contract not get a new one. Apollo tech was much better for what they are doing here. This is shuttle tech missused as Apollo tech.
monokhem 7 months ago
@monokhem True,if you look at how quickly technology progresses and if the cold war still was raging and a space race with it we would have these type of technolygies. And i agree but however if we are going to colonize the moon in the next 50 years hell ill be 64 lol.If you loook at technology in this year. We could be well on our way to a Mars mission in 20 years.Hey I still have that question about intersellar spaceflight on my last comment.
SuperColonel77 7 months ago
@SuperColonel77 I don't think we will see the beggining of intersteller travel in our life time. I'm prretty exited about our own solar system. Everything we want from space travel exept intellegent life is readiliy available here. If we gave NASA the buget of the Afghanistan war we could be at mars in ten years. I think vasimir could be ready in as little as a decade clearing the way for ruitine trips to Mars, mining of the asteroid belt, and the begginings of Colonies on the gas giants moons.
monokhem 7 months ago
Looks like N.A.S.A. is taking the "if it ain't broke don't fix it" approach to the moon program. Use a tried and tested space vehicle, with updated software.
Multistage rocket, command capsule, and moon lander. It should work out fine and save money on trying to develop some new type of delivery system.
Credithelper75 8 months ago
NASA hahahah ridiculous tecnology much much money for a stupid and ridicolus tecnology you american are very stupid the future fpr the new space ship tecnology belongs to Asian countries especialy INDIA and CHINA whit collaboration ITALY and JAPAN italian have new tipe of chemical fuel for navy space ship.
Xilon10 8 months ago
@Xilon10 Seriously what's the chemical fuel called?
SuperColonel77 8 months ago
@Xilon10 And those country's have walked on the moon how many times And its spelled :T-e-c-h-n-o-l-o-g-y,Who is stupid now ,Dont fuckin crack on Americans We along with the russians own space and have the most success, but I tell you what we will need Asians for what we needed them for in the west,A good laugh,To build railroads and to cook and clean!So dont you ever insult Americans again because your jealous cause your country sucks
lionpunk1WWE 8 months ago
@Xilon10 WTF do you think you are. You are one dumbass guy who just hates America. Your a fucking little cunt when it comes to knowing what the hell your talking about . You DUMB BASTARD.Ihave met some dumb bastards in my time but you outweigh them all. Hey you dumb fuck spell shit right for once. You ASIAN TRASH Motherfucker!!!!
SuperColonel77 7 months ago
i believe this has a very apollo program feel to it.
scifyjunkie 8 months ago
I do not see anything new in this ship except the name. this is 50 years old technologies. gimme real spaceship like enterprize.
voron27 8 months ago
This would be a good ship for traveling to the moon but not for sending astronauts into LEO.
TheWizardTrembyle 8 months ago
I don't know how humanity is going to space with a disposable rocket program? If this system could be re-used; I wouldn't squawk... but this system is more about launching and landing.... not interplanetary travel. We spend more on abandoning designs than we do building and running working craft. There is sufficient talent and technology to solve this... I think NASA needs to do what it does best... bold challenges... Half step programs puttering on government approval is going to kill NASA!
granddad2002 8 months ago
@granddad2002 couldn't agree with you more they need to build reusable decent sized eloctrmagnetically shileded spacecraft that stay in space- maybe parked in a moon base with a slingshot launcher or orbit the moon -and make good spacestations and get a new surface to space and vice virsa rocket or something better than a rocket - if they can then the long range ships at them moon could go where they like a lot faster!! - we should have all sorts with our tech but they spend it all on "defence"
davidanthonymitchell 8 months ago
ya no one really has it right other than sir Richard branson their space ship uses a hyrid rocket but it is a horizontil takeoff and also is about the sise of a short bus so it is kindof like a shuttle
storminmormin14 9 months ago
@storminmormin14 Richard branson's Virgin galactic is just a tourist vehical to get rich people a few minutes of micro gravity. it doesn't even reach orbit. it's of no value in an exploration capacity. The mercury program went further.
monokhem 8 months ago
I hate CAPSULESHIT i want a spaceship like " THe shuttle" or mabe like the space ships from Stargate Sg-1 :)
IanasAnd 9 months ago
is almost the same staff that Von Braun developed after WW2...plus some cute solar pannels...nothing really new
Yoshie1984 9 months ago
If it ain't broke don't fix it. It works fine so why make something more complicated that would only result in a greater risk to the humans on board.
Enatbyte 9 months ago
Okay well this isn't really "future technology" well not to any extream this is like technology we already have but don't bother doing cause its either to expensive or cause there is nothing to scientifically gain from doing such things.
rgrggfdgfgr 9 months ago
@rgrggfdgfgr I think not. They do mainstream observations. they convert dust to water (supernatural like jesus' like)
and push technology
MyPenis13inchGirlFit 9 months ago
Jupiter Island is full of mountains
Ruby rivers and sapphire fountains
Chessboard lawns bible black and white
The pink and blue trees are incredibly bright
An orange sunset painted on the sky
Take my hand and we'll fly
Tonystarkes888 9 months ago
Rocket technology? This looks alot like the Apollo lunar modules . NASA needs more funding from participating countries, its a travesty that we are heavily invested in fossil fuels and war, when exploration and alternative energy sources should be our most important endeavors.
neighborhoodhoodlum 10 months ago
all that to get back one little piece is a waste
badaboomrock 10 months ago
looks like a larger version of the same old 1970s technology. bring on the plasma and fusion tech now!
Georgeqaws 10 months ago
What a fucking deathtrap. The space version of the Ford Pinto
rds13601 10 months ago
they should either send a ship or a probe or something, to gliese 581 g or alpha centauri, or what ever its name is. Im bored of mars,.... well just bored of our solar system..
Hummermaniac1 11 months ago
why rockets i thought USA had UFO's that can travel at lightspeed
Tonystarkes888 11 months ago
@Tonystarkes888 to travel at speed of light you don't need to travel. You need to bend space around you literally and takes the energy of a star and it must be the volume of Jupiter.
MyPenis13inchGirlFit 9 months ago
Tonystarkes888 9 months ago
@Tonystarkes888 this satire hoho
MyPenis13inchGirlFit 9 months ago
@MyPenis13inchGirlFit the band is Porcupine Tree, the song title is Jupiter Island, it is wat aliens have on there ipods when they cruise deep space :)
Tonystarkes888 9 months ago
The only way i think the space program will really get going is when the private sector gets on it.
MrBigfan007 1 year ago
.... cancelled project ....
nikobrown1990 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
we're never going to mars. we're never going to travel further into space than the moon. Want to know why? because we're all scared, and our technology is fucking horrible.
zomgwtfbbqbagel 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
we're never going to mars. we're never going to travel further into space than the moon. Want to know why? because we're all scared, and our technology is fucking horrible.
zomgwtfbbqbagel 1 year ago
we're never going to mars. we're never going to travel further into space than the moon. Want to know why? because we're all scared, and out technology is fucking horrible.
zomgwtfbbqbagel 1 year ago
@zomgwtfbbqbagel Our technology is horrible? We've had the technology to go to Mars for decades. Furthermore, we are not scared, you may be, but humanity is not. Its attitudes like yours that would have caused the Americas from never being discovered, deemed powered flight "impossible" and thus a waste of time or impossible to go to the moon, but we did. If we never try, we never go anywhere, and if we never go anywhere, no progress is made. Cowardice is not a substitute for innovation.
NelielTuOderswank 1 year ago
@NelielTuOderswank we all day in the end.
zomgwtfbbqbagel 1 year ago
@NelielTuOderswank this is dated old tech.go look at what burt rutan can do for a fraction of the money.
cartmanrlsusall 11 months ago
@NelielTuOderswank Nasa is a front for the real deal, and a tax right off, to waist money on primitive techno- and rocket fosil fuels, when the alien craft, are already flying through space and time. oh yes we already been to mars,, and way beyond that, i do believe.
frankenboston 11 months ago
@zomgwtfbbqbagel We are scared to take risks these days, but the technology is there, if someone can pay for it
b3gunkid90 1 year ago
Mars need sex machine.
cyprezz 1 year ago
why does nasa keep sending robots to mars?
TheBarns95 1 year ago
@TheBarns95 To study the composition of the land.... duh.
Cod4Paradox 1 year ago
@TheBarns95 To make it look like they're actually doing something worth while.
RedVynil 1 year ago
Is tha all ??,…
what about Mars ?
vincent7520 1 year ago
Gus grissom and his two other fellow crew perished in the first test. You gotta assume these new rockets will be safer. Stop the Iraq war, save the bucks, and it all comes together by 2010 for return to moon (and back ;)
9000Robin 1 year ago
People, we could build all kinds of rocket,spaceship,go to the mar,etc, but there are one main issue:money. We are in a recession right now and we are dead broke. 20 percent of the taxes money we paid go to paid just the interest of the loan uncle sam borrow. So the next 10-20 years don't expect any fancy thing coming from nasa. Shit, nasa is lucky socialist obama didn't cut deeper than he wanted. Had he has his way, nasa would be a temporary museum.Truth hurt!
nbsbb2009 1 year ago
@nbsbb2009 Calling Obama a socialist and saying hes cutting down NASA? I cannot even fathom your bigotry. NASA is receiving an addition 6 billion USD under the Obama administration, the only thing changing is where the money is being spent. Constellation is being scrapped to be substituted for a much cheaper shuttle derived launch system, which in turn will be taking us to the moon, asteroids, and ultimately Mars by 2030.
NelielTuOderswank 1 year ago
this it old shit, what are they doing today not twenty years age wake up.
finican 1 year ago
wtf is this,60 years since apollo and we are still going back to the fucking moon,if the money used in the iraq war is used to invest on this instead,we would probably be on mars now,Damn there are so many other techs for space travel,like build a space elevator which is possible now thanks to carbon nanotubes,go read up on it and ships powered by solar sails,nuclear pulse propulsion,nuclear fusion.Heck there is even an equation for WARP DRIVES,u think those govt monkeys even have a brain.......
KaminariKatta 1 year ago
They should watch more stargate atlantis or something.
No seriously, why don't they use other technologie like splitting atoms?
Or building a moon suplier base and schoot from there to differend places witch we can't visit now because its 2 far.
Make a chain of suply bases or do something with wireless power transportation, catch energie from the sun and shoot it wireless troughout spaceships that uses it to fly.
Or build a gigantic slingshot and then shoot from the moon.
After that use gas.
Stanna5x 1 year ago
@Stanna5x That's science fiction.
SlightyDisturbedNBK 1 year ago
@Stanna5x Dude, Splitting atoms only makes a bomb. Splitting atom doesn't work. Why else do we have nuclear bombs? What you want nuclear powered ships that destroys environment of the planet? Read Nuclear Fission.
makemap 10 months ago
@makemap WTH are you talking about??
Sunshrine2 10 months ago
Thanks OBaMA
nipponhouseplayer 1 year ago
really? this is what you have for us? still burning fuel to get to space and parachutes for landing? you might as well say you guys are stuck in the 60's
paquint78 1 year ago 2
@paquint78 Agreed, we should have better technology than this crap.
pettyofficer30 1 year ago
really? we are taking ten steps back..... we should not even be using fuel for take off, nor using parachutes for landing, are you kidding me???????????????
paquint78 1 year ago
@paquint78 Any ideas then?
SlightyDisturbedNBK 1 year ago
it looks like a needle
freeworld420soldier 1 year ago
Wouldn't it be possible to make a capsule that doesn't leave trash on the moon and in space orbiting the earth? i mean theres already so much space trash orbiting the earth that its get more and more difficult to launch satellite..?
Ph33NIXx 1 year ago
lol it lands on Area 51...look at 4:51 and compare
MrDGsT 1 year ago
we really need a new way of getting into space without using that much fuel, and without using rockets, they're SOO inefficient!
BrazillianFOsho 1 year ago
@BrazillianFOsho What are we gonna do? Magically press a button and make some new never ending power source?
Beandude202 1 year ago
@Beandude202 well there is a engine in development that wil give enough power to reach mars in 39 days and this motor uses plasma and no fuel
TheDRstudios 1 year ago
@BrazillianFOsho thats why obama is trying 2 make space travel a public business.. then the price will go down, for instance... there are already several prototypes being built by several different companys... and they apparently can take people or cargo into orbit for way cheaper then nasa and their expensive shuttles... that virgin mobile guy will be selling trips to orbit for 200 000 dollars a seat starting in 2012, nasa spends about 15-20 million sending a single astronaught to ISS
101andrewj 1 year ago
Wow what is that thing?
TricKyMcTrickPants 1 year ago
NOW LOOK HERE, we all wanna see some anti-gravity Star Trek type shit ASAP and I'm sure it is possible, but I doubt anyone here is enough of an expert on any of the required subject matter to be able to say whether or not this rocket is a piece of crap. Who knows, maybe this is still the most cost effective way to get shit into orbit. anyway it's all about the space elevator
witz85 1 year ago
All of you conspiracy theorists are ridiculous.
LegosPL0X 1 year ago
are these actually what there thinking of ROCKETS WERE SOOO 50 years ago i mean come one time to do some remodelling
inukiasa 1 year ago
It's just a massive insult to the intelligence of an aware populace. Those that don't know any different are already out of the loop.
They expect us to believe this crap is the best that they can do when most savvy interested parties know something about electro-gravitic propulsion systems. Go google the pics for Aurora project SR-91. This is as painful as watching a fucking B-movie.
I wish NASA would stop treating us like fucking idiots.
I hope this fucking piece of shit falls on the bastards.
warlock242 1 year ago
I'm can't wait to tell my kids that I flew into space the same way my father did... and on the same design.
MsBobBlob 1 year ago
....too much noise, too much smoke, too much hardware. C'mon Earthlings, is this best your rocket-science can offer??? I dont suppose you have Fred Flintsone aboard do ya? Sheeeesh!!
finian4558 1 year ago
"Shhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!! Earthlings, can you keep it down a little. We are trying to get some sleep......" (message from the planet Xorba on the other side of the Solar system)
finian4558 1 year ago
ih looks lame, but there is many technolgy put in and this spacecraft is mach more progresive than its look like,,
for all the anty gravity syfy fans.. :D
I have seen an ufo two times in my life.. one time I was 7 and the other time I was drinking bear with my cousin.. we saw it bouth, so it was there..
I dont belive in green man, but if there are ufos somewhere, than the technology what is going to dewelop from this lame spacecraft has real potention..
kalvishkungs18 1 year ago
@kalvishkungs18 it still costs ten grand a pound to put something in orbit. that is not effective cost benefit relations. until such time as its feasible to have open space tourism, and mining jobs on the moon, don't hold your breath on anything useful.
Dierwolf2000 1 year ago
LAME !!!!!!!!
snlker 1 year ago
Houston, we have a problem
oomblikkies 1 year ago
Arthur C. Clarke wrote a book about space elevators, but I am not sure we have any material strong enough to make the rope for the elevator and if we do we cannot make it in enough quantities/quality. A space elevator can only get you into orbit anyway, some type of propulsion system will be needed to explore the rest of the solar system.
Untemperedsteel 1 year ago
if we had an effective method of producing carbon nanotubes we could build a space elevator, spaceflight would be much simpler after that
chevezez 1 year ago
we have got to get past rockets there just to slow. we need a new propultion system what are they doing at NASA building a new rocket .There must be a better way .Just think all that money spent on wars what it could do for the space program its just so sad.
solentgreen2020 2 years ago
Sorry to change the subject but this is space-related.
To see a partial summary of the clear evidence that the Apollo moon missions were faked, google "The Naked Scientists". In the "New Theories" section of the forum there's a thread entitled "Did We Land on the Moon?". The summary is on page 15. It's the 7th one from the top.
Once people have seen the hoax evidence, there's nothing anyone can do to make them believe we went to the moon.
Also, do a YouTube search on "MarsFaker".
Cosmored 2 years ago
@Cosmored Are you sure your birth was not faked?
oomblikkies 1 year ago
there is no sound in space so why can i hear the rocket engine in space?
and it is not an embarrassment we have not been back to the moon. no matter how advanced technology gets, the escape velocity of earth remains the same and technology cannot grow exponentially forever.
borderlinebuddhist 2 years ago
You willing to put that theory to the test in a fight mate?
watts18269 1 year ago
um why are they using remodled 1960s crap
hell i was expecting massive space criusers by now
conorlydon 2 years ago 2
@conorlydon 2 many movies and video games creating false standards
chevezez 1 year ago
Its an embarrassment that theirs no one living on the moon yet.
ffpilot23 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Does anybody really believe that we haven't developed better flight technology beyond the primitive rocket, 50 years after Apollo 11? FUCK YOU N.A.S.A. . YOU ARE NOTHING BUT LIARS AND AN EMBARRASSMENT TO THE TRUTH. (N.A.S.A.) ... NEVER A STRAIGHT ANSWER.
Tiberiusduck 2 years ago
I don't see you developing any new propultion systems?
reblives 2 years ago
I hear ya, Never A Straight Answer. They have most certainly developed in secret, craft way better than this crap ,which is going backwards.They have classified space programs that use anti gravity or electromagnetic propulsion that I myself have seen these craft several times. NASA is just a public smokescreen to hide the real programs.They have already been to Mars and other planets in the solar system. NASA knows the truth ,and its job is to hide it.They do release small amounts of truth.
snlker 2 years ago 2
@snlker
Well as you have seen these things please tell us all about it.
tpsossff 1 year ago
@tpsossff Well from my porch I was several of them, they glow really bright white or orange at times. They hover or move around. At night I look up and keep my eye in the sky for a while and can see several of the same craft flying out in space. They change speed and direction,and a few I saw came to a complete stop. I see them fly across the sky very fast and in formation at times. They also just appear out of nowhere like you see from the footage of several shuttle missions.I see the same thg.
snlker 1 year ago
@snlker
Why would they hide the existance of these futuristic space craft?
If there really is what can be described as a space drive (no thrust) why the secrecy when the technology could be used to make an unmanned mission to another star and return in a few years?
Such a space drive would not necessarily be any good for lifting stuff into space so the big rockets will always be needed.
tpsossff 1 year ago
@tpsossff Actually Rockets are inefficient and not need at all. NASA is a smokescreen to hide the real programs that are mainly military. Anti gravity /electromagnetic propulsion is far superior to rockets. These craft use quantum mechanics .The extreme osculation of electromagnetic energy causes mass to become less mass, so very little propulsion is needed to move at extreme speeds. The drive also protects from cosmic radiation.This is secret,why? it would free mankind from centralized control.
snlker 1 year ago
@snlker
hahaha good joke man .
MrRieser 1 year ago
@MrRieser No Joke, I just saw more of them 2 nights ago ,and my neighbor across the street who thought I was crazy that I saw these things, came out and saw them with me. Just like footage from the space shuttle you can find clips of on here... The space shuttle ,and crap like this is not how you travel through space quickly ,safely ,and efficiently ...Electromagnetic anti gravity gives you all that, and protects occupants from cosmic rays. :)
snlker 1 year ago
@snlker dude we have never been to mars and NASA isn't a smokescreen because any other projects would have been discovered by now. Also, wouldn't it be weird if nasa launched different spacecraft than just the shuttle. People would get suspicous
MrCallofdutyman 1 year ago
@MrCallofdutyman Dude , YES WE HAVE!! :) They do not blast out with anti gravity. They just fly out, and for the most part unnoticed . I have seen them several times with witnesses .There are pics from their own data bases that show civilization on Mars,as well as life. NASA IS a smokescreen , and pathetic. The real programs are far far more advanced ,and Rockets are NOT the way to travel in space... Break out of the box my friend...we are lied to !!
snlker 1 year ago
@snlker well spoken young one
erespan 1 year ago
@snlker far out man, have they been to uranus?
ThatAngryRanter 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@snlker How and why would they hide it?
Enatbyte 9 months ago
I'm bored of nasa sending their rc toys to the same old places...
andresq4545 2 years ago 33
@andresq4545 Exactly. Time to launch one to Europa. Everyone with atleast half a damn brain knows mars is inhabitable.
Glennfalconi 1 year ago
@andresq4545 for shure they have very interesting other "spaceships" that they wont show anybody
samuraifugitivo 1 year ago