@primuseklips : You are MOST welcome for those kind words! Hearing from people like you makes up for all of the negative, critical, hostile messages. Much appreciated!!!
An interesting quick lecture on magaliths. Perhaps the current crop of Egyptologists should be replaced with engineers? Strictly speaking, engineering is the core of megalith problems. Whatever megalith that is there, we have to focus on answering questions in the form of -- is it humanly/engineeringly possible?
@Waterflux : Some megaliths, but not nearly all, could be replicated today. Stonehenge might well be doable now. However, put into the time and place ALL of them were supposedly created, there is little doubt humans then could not possibly have done them.
@OfficialLloydPye : Look up Wally Wallington from Canada. He built a stonehenge replica by himself using only simple tools and leverage. Really takes the mystery out of how it could have been done by anyone.
Ooops. Sorry, Wally Wallington is from Michigan and not Canada. Just search here on YouTube to see videos of him at work. He's an amazingly clever man who figured out how to move very large blocks (several tons) with very little effort. Really worth a look.
Man I'm so glad you're still hard at it. I haven't had much time to keep digging around. But just today a cousin come over, He had many Q's, He knows I've been working on thing's like this. We had went through many topics, before ending them on you're page, Cause he had to go. But he will be a future visitor I'm sure. He had no ideal about some of the thing's I have on my page & yours.
You probably don't remember talking to me, but I will never forget it. Thanks again. Take care.
@Snowman374th : I'm glad you both found things to consider in this area of knowledge, and I'm grateful my work was able to add significantly to your discussion. Keep at it!!!
Your so right -the old saying it takes many hands to make light work can`t even fit here it would take thousands with ropes and fulcrums all around this stone to lift it the mass on the ropes around it would be an impossible size .
I just can't seem to find the entire Megalithic lecture. Where is it, don't stifle it, and I am always wanting to see it. You don't know what a good deed you would be doing to show us your Megalithic structure video despite the internet and YT.
@TheWaterlily2012 : It's an excerpt from a lecture done in Australia five or six years ago. I don't know where the original lecture video can be found. Perhaps through Nexus Magazine. It was done at a conference they organized. Okay?
@TheWaterlily2012 : I have plenty of lectures available on Youtube, plus the Starchild and Intervention Theory eBooks, both of which are excellent if I say so myself! ;-) And if you're interested in Bigfoot, I have a new novel being made available as an eBook today!
@OfficialLloydPye Yes, and I've watched all of the ones available and hope others will as well. Did you see that picture of Bigfoot on the Coast 2 Coast website? If so, what did you think of it? It sure will be nice when all of the truth comes out on the Extraterrestrials. They have been here and are still here. I'm not sure if they really want to be known to everyone though. Your ET skull is unique, though I also like those elongated ones in Peru too. One had these HUGE orbital sockets.
@TheWaterlily2012 : Yes, I saw it. Unfortunately, it could be photoshopped, and as long as that is the case, that will be the default conclusion. And, yes, the coneheads in Peru are hugely important, no doubt about it.
@OfficialLloydPye That's what I thought you would say. He looked a bit too cheery for a real one too, lol. I wish the best of luck to you with the Starchild and that guy in Peru who is trying to do DNA on his red-headed elongated skulls. I missed my calling in life, for I would like nothing more than to dig around in archaeological ruins and look at skulls all day. If I ever win the lottery, I'm investing it in such things as these. :)
@TheWaterlily2012 : Yes, Brien Foerster is the gentleman you're referring to. He's doing terrific work with the coneheads, and already is a world expert about them.
@OfficialLloydPye Yes, that's his name. There are things over there that are truely baffling. Like those huge stones with the perfect round holes in them no one can figure out? If I can ever get out of this country that's one place I want to go to see such things in person.
Llyod, I don,t know if you ever watched or read Chris Dun's work (the lost technologies of ancient Egypt + the Giza Power Plant) he has many videos here on youtube..I find after reading books and books on the subject, his is the most plausible, he is a master engineer and machinist and has studied the megaliths from an engineers viewpoint: Giza power house is amazing, you gotta read his stuff Llyod meets what you are saying.
I always look at it with the view that they were cutting, dressing and moving these massive stones with ease, why use such large stones when you could build the same structure with lighter smaller stones?, like we do today, we build massive structures with small bricks prefab steel etc, although we have heavy moving equipment, far in advance of what we attribute to these ancient cultures. Why would they have made it so hard, for no apparent reason?. And as for the precision, its unbelievable!.
@SpeciesofNecessity : They did it that way because they could. The precision seems to be due to some kind of laser-like cutting devices. The size seems to be due to anti-gravity devices. And we can NOT match what they did in some cases with the heaviest equipment we have today. Plus moving the stones great distances, and often up and down high, steep hills. These are all things we can't match today.
@OfficialLloydPye Yeah thats what I think, it makes sense, Ive looked at some of the work of Christopher Dunn, He thinks ultrasonic or some sort of laser. Maybe they had a better understanding of physics that we do today. As I understand it we still don't know what gravity is? so to most people talking about inverse or anti gravity just makes them roll there eyes and think your some wacko nut job. They wont even consider it. Its like modern science is backwards.
@SpeciesofNecessity : Modern science is shockingly ignorant of the vast majority of fundamental knowledge about the universe and its actual workings. They are as ignorant today as clerics were 500 years ago. They know more, yes, but it's no more correct than the old beliefs in a flat Earth or an Earth as the center of the universe.
Lloyd Pye, why are you so hostile to people who ask fair questions such as a plea for evidence? Maybe you should smoke some weed, chill out and watch some Stargate...?
@brokenclockist : It's not the questions or the pleas for evidence, it's the aggressive tone of questioning, or just jerky comments like yours that I feel no need to respect.
Your work is logical with far fewer gaps than the current commonly accepted theory. Imo, if doesnt make logical sense, somethings off. Even at 14yrs I asked questions that couldnt be answered without the obvious logical answer being given- instead we were given a load of dribble followed by its a matter of time. Coming across your work was like the lights being turned on in a dark room, the more u dug the more solid it gets. Keep up the good work, you have many people behind you & your work :)
@Ponytoad : Thanks for those kind words of encouragement. It is people like you who make it worthwhile to have to tolerate the idiocy of dunderheads like SkepticalAaron and others further down this string. One perceptive fan like you balances out ten skeptics who don't bother to check facts, who just shoot from the lip when anyone challenges any dogma promoted by the religion of mainstream science.
@SkepticalAaron : Okay, then, I'll go ahead and call you stupid because you obviously are, and you're looking for a fight as well, so you have one. The divots and pitting you mention are indeed sometimes taken by researchers, but in other cases they have been chipped out by souvenir hunters over the past couple of thousand years. I mean, really, your average moron could figure that one out, couldn't they? Why can't you?
@OfficialLloydPye you can never be too sure with these mega morons.....this could go on a while, great work btw, just watched your starchild lecture, thank you for opening minds
The only thing "obsurd" is the obsurd amount of information you left out. How come,for just one example,when you have your slide of the unfinished obelisk up, you don't talk about how the top of it has those in your face round divots in them and what they are? If some super precise machine from aliens was carving out the obelisk,then how/why did it leave the top full of round divots? How come the channels surrounding it are divot-ed out trenches and weren't cut by the precise alien technology?
@SkepticalAaron : Your tone doesn't deserve a respectful answer, but here it is. Those making it obviously had heavy scoring machines attached to the area where they were shaping the spire. As pressure to remove the granite was applied, they pressed too hard and cracked the obelisk, after which they unhooked and moved on. As for the divots, those were most likely cored by modern researchers learning what they could about the stone and why it might have cracked under "normal" circumstances.
@OfficialLloydPye Its ironic you talk about tone when during your whole video you spoke very condescending and you like to remark how stupid people are. You didn't really answer my question,you just restated your video,so I'll ask again. Why if there were precision machines-more precise than today- would everything else be so pitted and full of divots? Also,other sites,not just the obelisk are full of these marking,you're making up that they are created by modern researchers.
Skeptical? No, I don't think so. If you were skeptical, you would be asking mainstream academia for answers to Lloyd Pye's work rather than skulking around asking moronic questions and casting aspersion without any intent other than to obfuscate and disparage. Do Mr. Pye, myself, and all others who no longer accept the dim-witted proclamations that you and mainstream science offer, slink back to your ivory tower, and stick your corpulent head up your pimple laced arse. Please.
Scientists come up with facts like ex: Humans have 96% of ape dna and then they come up with a hypothesis that its evolution but they use it as proof and decide to teach it in schools.
Then ppl who are brainwashed view you as a conspirasist and uneducated because you go against what being taught in schools. Mainstream are deciding what scientists should say. Its a fixed system. If this was ruled by sincere ppl we could have been far more advanced. Mr Pye i admire your work. Need more like you
An actual STARGATE/PORTAL-THING was caught on film in New Mexico. The footage can be found within the short-film entitled "SUDDEN PORTHOLE", which is parked at the PROJECT CAMELOT YouTube page (it's under the George Noory video).
I'm not selling anything…I'm just trying to spread the word about the unseen-dimensions we find ourselves embedded in.
My BLOG contains peripheral data regarding the movie and is where I reply to the "debunkers" (use search words "SAM ZURICK" & "BLOG"). THANKS!!
The other obvious question is the stones that made the pyramids, must of been mined or quarried from somewhere so there must be a very big hole somewhere even after all this time
@Marcus538 : The limestone was mined in the same area. The pyramids rest atop a gigantic limestone outcrop. The huge granite slabs inside it were mined 600 miles to the south.
Llyoyd, I find your theories very convincing. I'm leaning tword your pov but forever a sceptic I do my own research. I saw nova carve and raise an obelisk with primative tools, not as big as the unfinished obelisk but non the less??
@psycologicalnudity : When you say "not as big," that is an understatement the size of a great pyramid. I know the show you're referring to, and their efforts were a joke compared to those who cut and move and raise true megalithic stones around the world. It's like saying if you can pick up a brick and set it in a wall, you might just as easily lift and place one of the Trilithons at Baabek. Never gonna happen.....
@korzon : Actually, there probably was a "great" flood in history. But there is a big difference between weathering from a "gully washer" effect from a flood, which is at the angle of the flow, and the steady dripping downward, and running downward, of water from rain. The Sphinx is unmistakably from rain and its aftereffects.
@OfficialLloydPye I can understand that.When you look at the side walls there are cuts in them going downwards.But the grand canyon itself is proof of a flood as well.Too bad scientists don't care for real investigation.As they can tell us they have DNA from neanderthal bones then why can't they test the DNA from that starchild skull?Seems anything out of place with their evolutionary scale they ignore it because they are afraid of what they might find obviously.
@OfficialLloydPye Just like in 1986 when I graduated they said for a fact that the moon formed from the earth and for 40 years taught that till now.Because the suposed samples do not even match those of earth.Either they don't know how too properly investigate evidence or they are just plain liars.And for a foreighn body as the moon to be pulled perfectly into orbit is impposible.Not too mention the moon gives us tides and sustains life here.They ignore what they can't explain thats not science.
@korzon : What can anyone say beyond agreeing that you're 100% correct. What science does is not actually what science is supposed to be. They cover their asses and call that science.
@OfficialLloydPye Not only that they cover their asses they come up with one theory scrap that and come up with a nother stupid one just too seem they know something.They change their theories like skid stained underwear.All a PHD. is being a parrot repeating what you were taught even if that theory is unsound and proven wrong later.The only thing I have ever seen evolve so far is technology and that is from direct intervention.So obviously any changes in biology have to be a direct intervention
The last bit about the unfinished obelisk basicly proves in 2 minutes, without a doubt, that official history is wrong, and whoever did this obelisk must have had advanced technology. Not saying the other things dont, the obelisk just made the biggest impression. You dont make it like that if you cant cut it loose and get it up, and well that seems to be quite a difficult task.
@DaDawg4real They would have too suspend it while cutting in order too break it free thats for sure and we can't even do it today.I would love too see those moron myth busters try and pull it off so I can laugh my ass off when they can't.We might be able to move stones like stonehenge back then but certainly not the Megoliths.
@GhostGrind : That's a very good question, and the results are too new and possibly incomplete to be sure that they don't. Still, it would seem the situation would be the other way around, with Africans having more than non-Africans, IF--and of course it's a big IF--humans actually evolved from Neanderthals from Africa, as is believed.
lloyd, I really appreciate your views and you have really opened my eyes. I've never been the type who likes to follow the pack (of sheeple), and I've always liked to think outside the box. Everything you say seems to fall into place, much more naturally than what I've grown up thinking. You can add one more supporter to your list
@mjsmtih204 Well said...Strange how when someone uses common sense and logic, can accept the truth a little easier. Most people fear this(truth)...it goes against their belief or their teachings and stand firm about the science to prove these theories. I like to keep that open mind and what Lyod,graham,Sitchin..etc say, is easier to believe.
@thetexanfan Not only is it easy to believe, on an emotional level, but there is EVIDENCE for it. Not as much as we'd like but at least there is some. There is no missing link, and there never will be. What you say holds true for politics and the lies we're fed by the educational system and media. It's all a big white wash. You name the subject - freedom, terrorism, ufos, nutrition, etc. etc. feel free to add to the list!! lol
*moment of profound revelation* Lloyd, I'd heard you mention in your lectures about all domesticated animals being engineered as well, but couldn't wrap my mind around it until now. Suzla1 commented on this and the ideas of them being a comfort, OR a pest killer in the case of cats, and all of the obvious uses for dogs makes complete sense! I suppose conventional wisdom is that we (humans) bred them for purposes, but I like your hypothesis better! Do you cover this in your book?
@carlonbass : Sorry to be slow responding to this. Was gone for a few days. But, yes, I do cover many of those things in my book, EYKIW, but not the combination of traits in cheetahs. That came to me after the book was published.
@OfficialLloydPye I had read about your comments on cheetahs. If I'm not mistaken, you make the claim that every cheetah is a clone. Correct me if i'm wrong. Is there scientific evidence for this? If so, wouldn't that be like a smoking gun? At the very least for SOME kind of genetic meddling, without specificity on who.
@carlonbass : I don't say they ARE clones, I say they are LIKE clones. They are very much genetically alike, more than any other species I'm aware of among the higher animals. And, yes, this is a kind of smoking gun that the mainstream avoids trying to deal with. They say cheetahs somehow went through a very tight "genetic bottleneck" at some point in their past, but that's ridiculous. Why them among all other big cats?
I could listen to his lectures for hours...if only I had that much extra time :-). His presentation is gripping and easy to follow. I am a multi-tasker and I just can't shake that habit, I am always thinking of what I have to do while I am engaged in something. Then when it's over I realize I missed some info, but with Pye I don't have that issue. No way humans put those stones where they are, 1 study listed how far they would have had to go to get the stones.
@indibabs122275 'No way'? Several studies show how far they would have to go, and even more studies (real studies, not 'that's silly, only aliens can do that' arguments) show how it could be done. I am not claiming unequivocally that no monolithic structure on Earth was made by aliens, but the arguments are weak and the evidence is scarce.
It's interesting to also note that the megalyths all over the world were built to last. Every time Nibiru passes by our planet they are unaffected. No man-made structures can last forever. Even skyscrapers require weekly maintenance; other wise they would collapse on their own in a couple of years.
My friend is an evolutionist and i'm an interventionist, we debate our points of views on this matter all the time. He says the bigfoot creatures have 46 chromosomes, because primape hair was discovered a few years ago in N. America and analysized. He claims the bigfoot creatures evolved along with us.
I tell him the Annunaki knew about all the planets in the solar system, he claims anyone can find that information out by mapping the stars.
@GhostGrind : All hominoids, including the bigfoot type, will have 48 chromosomes because they are upright walking primates. We are something else entirely, and our 46 chromosomes prove that. And the fact that the Sumerians knew about Uranus, Neptune, and Pluto makes it clear they were told about them by individuals not bound by the restrictions on typical humans 5,000 years ago.
@tungsten33 : Higher primates have 48, humans have 46. The question is whether Neanderthals had 48 or 46. So far as I know, that number has not been announced by the Neanderthal genome project.
@tedmon11 : I've been there, and you're right, there must have been some anti-gravity involved in what he did. It sure wasn't ALL block and tackle, as the mainstream insists. Impossible for a man that size working alone with stones of such enormous size.
The stone at the Aswan quarry really highlights the impossibility of stone age tech achieving all this, how did they shape the stone? At 6:57 there's a picture of a man standing on the stone, if you look at chip marks on the tip and use the man for scale you can plainly see that they're huge! What would leave marks that big?
One has to stop and think... how were the stones in all the megaliths transported from their place of origin to their final destination, how the stones were cut with such precision and how the stones were lifted & placed accurately into position using stone age tech?
I personally cannot believe that humans did this unassisted, if they were involved at all.
Not lasers - but an advanced use of sound. MMm power generator! No I dont think so because If they had the power to cut and move rocks they already had the means to generate power. The pyramid was built with incredible magnetic properties. Incidently have you heard of what happens to people who spend a night in the great pyramid, they get very sick! You cannot fly over it either. For me it was clearly built to be functional. It was a tool to an advanced people. Why make it because you can?
@benno901 'The Pyramids' by Valery Uvarov is probably the most profound book Ive ever read. If the info in that book is real, and I reckon it is, we should ALL be building our own pyramids in our own gardens. If the info in that book is right, pyramids are key to us truly 'evolving'.
Do you know the feeling you get when you chance upon a great secret and you want to share it with the world? Well, thats what I feel when I think about that book.
Hi Lloyd - What I know is it was built using ultrasonic cutters and anti-gravity. Technology we don't have today. Supposedly it was built in 9 years by Thoth - not Cheops. Cheops did knew how it was to be used. The great pyramid is a tool with two specific purposes. As for a date it appears that it is 17,500 or so years old, built 3000 years before the great flood. .
@benno901 : That's one interpretation for the Great Pyramids, and there are more than that, obviously, but I would agree with the laser cutters and the antigravity--those two aspects are virtually essential when you get down to the nitty gritty of how it was done. Oh, and mechanical boring tools, too. Check Chris Dunn's "The Giza Power Plant" for excellent analysis of the engineering problems involved and how they were overcome.
@benno901 Huh? What great flood? Where is the evidence for that?There are seashells on the mountain tops now because that land used to be underwater millions of years ago.It does not denote or imply there was a great flood.The amount of water on Earth is the same as millions of years ago, but in a different form.Ice ,liquid or gas vapor.
@tedmon11 Indeed tectonic forces over millions of years is why we find sea shells on mountain tops. The 'Great Flood' may of been due to sea levels inundating the land, 300 ft or so we are told. The bible is ultimately a book of history and records this along with other corroborating sources.
@tedmon11 I am sorry.the bible is NOT a book of historical facts.if thats the case, please tell me how Noah collected all ten thousand species of animals and just happened to put ALL the marsupeals in Australia ?
@tedmon11 I highly recommend the book "The Lost Book of Enki" by Zecharia Sitchin. It's a translation of 13 or 14 ancient Sumerian texts found in the ancient city of Ur. It will explain the whole picture. The ancient texts tell us exactly who built the pyramids and sphinx, and MUCH more. Even if you don't believe that Sitchin's translations are completely accurate, the big picture is still clear. Even if only 30% of it is accurately translated, the picture remains the same. Aliens.
Pye's only argument here is that because he can't imagine how ancients could have built these structures, they must have been built by aliens. This is an unrealistically simplistic leap. It doesn't follow.
If existing hypotheses of their construction methods are flawed, why not debunk them? Instead, he just ignores them and only presents what amounts to his gut feeling.
This is only convincing to people who already agree to him. Not anyone else.
@Sapieteuthid : You're right, it's basically a close-minded approach (yours) versus an open-minded approach (mine). Since humans can't recreate such structures today using the best people and equipment we have, I think it's fair to suggest aliens had a hand in it. However, you're free to believe in all the magic you need to make it happen at the hands of the primitives alive at those times.
@OfficialLloydPye On the contrary, I think I am very open minded - this is why I care about evidence and good arguments. The video comes up short. There is nothing there other than Pye's appeal to the incredulity of his laymen audience. If he doesn't even address existing hypotheses, what can an impartial observer assume but that he didn’t even do his research?
The fact that HE can't think of a way ancients could have done this means nothing to me. Why should it?
@Sapieteuthid : It's clear YOU have never done a lick of research into this problem, which anyone reading your comments can see. That said, my argument is not based on MY opinion about it, but on the fact that NOBODY can come up with a plausible way for primitive people to cut, shape, move, lift, and set in place 2000 ton stones (Baalbek) of surpassing hardness. You've obviously never heard what engineers have to say about solving the problems involved. You're making an ass out of yourself here.
And I don't see on what you're basing your claim that I have never done any research. I have made no claims on the subject. All I have done is pointed out that you (or Pye, if you are not he) have not presented any meaningful arguments. Viewers are given no evidence to base their opinions on. They must either take your word for it, or not. And as someone who cares about what is true and what isn't, it's not in my nature to do that.
@OfficialLloydPye I have to add that your reactionary hostility is not in the spirit of reasoned discourse. If you can't respond to any criticism without becoming annoyed or angry, you are too emotionally attached to your ideas. Do you always interpret disagreement as a hostile act?
@Sapieteuthid : I deal with plenty of disagreement. It comes to me almost every day. It's the supercilious assholes like you that wear me down. That's all.
@Sapieteuthid : Which engineers? Start with Chris Dunn. His work is easy to find. And I've given nothing but meaningful arguments. No one with any sense or knowledge of the subject of megalithic edifices tries to pretend that ancient peoples created them. Only people like you, with apparently no awareness of the real facts surrounding them, make the kind of asinine statements you're making about them. Again, this is not a place for people like you who don't know their stuff.
@OfficialLloydPye Due skepticism is asinine? You have provided nothing except what amounts to an emotional appeal. That you react with such hostility to how I don't accept your argument from incredulity at face value undermines your credibility because this is neither mature nor how a true academic behaves. Do not expect thinking people to agree with you just because you say so.
@OfficialLloydPye Regarding Chris Dunn, I'm now reading his website. The basis for his claim that Giza is some sort of reactor is rather elusive. Needless to say his opinions are fairly bizarre and uncommon. Are you sure that you were correct in using the plural "engineerS"? I don't imagine very many agree with his conclusions.
@Sapieteuthid : Reading excerpts from Chris' website is not reading his books. When you read his books, THEN you have the right to say his ideas are "rather elusive." Just because they SEEM elusive to a dimwit like you, that doesn't mean they actually are, does it?
@Sapieteuthid : Yes, plural is definitely the word for engineers who disagree with the "official party line" of the mainstream that you're trying to spout here on a site dedicated to the opposite viewpoint. What a moron you are! Do you think you can make a valid point here without actually knowing what you're talking about?
@Sapieteuthid : My position as stated is based on enormous amounts of research by many, many people, not one of which you've heard of, much less read. So this debate we're having is not "because I say so," it is merely "because you THINK so." You're parroting what the mainstream wants non-thinking bozos like you to believe, and you have fallen for it. Please stop bothering this list with your inanities. This is for people with smarts.
@OfficialLloydPye I'm afraid if you've done "enormous amounts of research", it just doesn't show. One would expect more substantiative arguments than "look it's so big", especially if it's intended for people with "smarts". And don't think I buy that arm chair conspiracy sound bite that the "mainstream" is somehow out to suppress you. That's a pitiful excuse made by people whose claims do not survive fair scrutiny, and are unable to handle that failure.
@OfficialLloydPye I'm looking into your many claims because a friend asked me to. She thought you were convincing, but she highly values my judgement.
Well, I have been to your websites, watched a number of your lectures, and I have found your evidence specious, your reasoning wishful and flawed, and rhetorical style meant to sound convincing to the sufficiently gullible. And now I learnt something of your character. You will now lose yourself a supporter.
@Sapieteuthid : Listen, if you're the best source of authority your friend could turn to, I feel sorry for her. Every once in a while a stiff-backed troll like you wanders into one of my threads and shows incredible ignorance of even basic understanding of the facts at issue. Megaliths are one of the most obvious "fingerprints of the gods" anywhere in the world, and most mainstream urchins have the good sense to stay away from them. You should have followed that wise path.
@OfficialLloydPye I already expect this to be futile, but why don't you give me one piece of evidence that they were built by aliens? Just remarking on their size doesn't cut it. If you can't imagine a way sufficiently clever and dedicated humans could have built them, that's only a remark on your imagination. It doesn't follow that therefore it was aliens. Incredulity-based arguments are worthless, and people who describe themselves as "smarts" should not waste their time on them.
@OfficialLloydPye My friend is the supporter who asked me to investigate your claims, as I said. Is this failure in reading comprehension quite typical for you?
Never mind, I don't care. I already have far more then I need to convince my friend that your claims are without merit. But based on how you have demonstrated complete intolerance for skepticism and scrutiny, I can also tell her that you are intellectually a juvenile.
@Sapieteuthid : Is this habit of shooting your mouth off when you haven't the foggiest idea what you're talking about typical for you? Never mind, I don't care, either. Tell her anything you want. Adios.
@OfficialLloydPye First off I'd like to say that English is not my first language so if I make mistakes, let me know. This is coming from a normal man with average knowledge of everything and it's just my humble opinion about all this stuff... To me your works and findings are a breath of fresh air for someone who never believed in either religions or the fact that we evolved from creatures who look noting like us... I've seen many debunkers trying HARD to proove you wrong (continues)
@OfficialLloydPye But all they did was critic your stuff without bringing anything else to actually prove you wrong. They accuse you of claiming things that we ''Have to believe'' while we have to ''Believe them'' in saying you make flawed arguments. How many time I've seen debunkers saying that ufos were things like weather balloons and they were'nt sure at all about it. Yet they were accusing people of ''jumping to conclusions'' and they exactly to the same on the other side''. (continues)
@OfficialLloydPye Your work is great and yes there may be flaws like everything else we were taught since school exists.On the other hand, it gives another explanation about humans origins and I highly respect that. So far I believe that you brought more proof and you make more sense than those who invented the ''evolution of man'' theory wich we accepted in a wimp. Thank you for your work Lloyd, I hope that one day the truth will came out...
@Sapieteuthid : Look, you're a mainstream shill, that's obvious to anyone reading your string. Why don't you just pack up and go home? This is not a place where you're going to find any comfort. You clearly don't know what you're talking about, you've probably never studied anything relating to the engineering of megalithic monuments or working with megalithic stones, so you're making a fool out of yourself. Give it up.
@OfficialLloydPye Yeah, fair skepticism = 'shill' and 'asshole'. Such paranoia and reactionary hostility is completely typical of people whose claims do not stand up to scrutiny.
I'm afraid all I'm getting from this exchange is that you're just an average peddler of pseudoscience who covers up the weakness of his arguments by inventing pointless and implausible conspiracies against them or their ideas. You have confirmed my suspicions.
@Sapieteuthid : Excuse me, but from the first message you wrote you were challenging me in a very offensive and small-minded way. You haven't deserved common courtesy since your first message, so you haven't gotten it. If you were a critic or even a skeptic, we probably would have gotten along. But you are obviously a debunker, someone who just attacks without knowing the first thing about the subject, and I have no respect for that.
@OfficialLloydPye Nothing I said in my first comment was offensive or "small-minded". It was a simple observation. Your argument in your video is, in fact, based incredulity, which makes it a piss-poor argument.
Your interpretation of this as deliberate hostility tells me that despite what you claim, you do not know how to handle scrutiny or criticism.
"there were giants on the earth in those days".... men whom from heaven to earth came. are we really going to believe that pyramid building was in fashion all around the world in every country? are we really going to believe that all those stories engraved in stone ..written on tablets.. plagerized into the bible....FOR THE LAST 20,000 YEARS are all simply "Myth's" I DONT THINK SO, when will the scientific community wake up and admit .."hey I think we better re-write the human history?"
I totally agree with FarmacyPhlaverd. Well presented information. The Genetics video is awesome too. Only discovered Sitchin in last few months. Reading two books at a time now. Just never collectively thought about it.. Too busy earning BS, MS and PhD degrees in another science. Last 15 years just too busy making money. Remained open minded to all things however. Between this and seeing video of Outer Space Phenomenon 1 and 2, I can hardly think of anything else.
Aliens showed give their special presence for a special interview that would lessen your trouble! maybe we are so violent natured that they're afraid to show themselves to us. their advantage is technological.
@ryancute22 : I don't think aliens would be afraid of anything relative to us. I think we're simply beneath their concern in terms of relating to us as equals. I think we're more like zoo animals than relatives, the way chimps and gorillas are to us....at least for now. Of course, as with everything, that could be a very wrong perception.
@OfficialLloydPye ZOO ANIMALS?! Yeah, and then take us seriously if we evolve having super powers and stuff! looks there's a truth to these "SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST" thing in the Universe.not to mention they don't probably have emotions of any KIND. I just hated when we are considered as one of the young and YET underdog species to be Experiment with.
I guess the moment we see how gorillas and chimps treated could probably the way "they" treat US. Bah! humbug it is waste of time :-(
@OfficialLloydPye well, thank you so much for the reply. i hope we evolve soon to stop these bastards from pestering our Earthly Territory. even if we are genetically engineered, it's our Choice to live our lives and not the way Aliens want us to be...
WHO CARES! I wouldn't spent my whole life searching for them IF THEY ARE NOT INTERESTED in showing themselves. of course, the US government secret departments knows some stuff about it but ain't worth my time. but maybe that's why you are around to help us see that aliens intervened.
Do you think we are capable of having super powers with regards to this so called alien human hybird. i mean, all that i have heard was that skull and the Pyramids made by aliens
just cause he couldnt build a pyramid doesnt mean that others couldnt.
there are plenty people today who have no idea how to build a bird house. others of us are carving fake crystal skulls. leave the science to those who know how to build a pyramid. lolll
@zebb1111 : Your problem, apparently among many, is that you have no idea how many scientists have actually tried to build a tiny pyramid replica and failed to do that. Do some research.
Amazing line: "The pyramids were rolex watches built to the size of mountains!" I have now watched dozens of this mans videos and lectures and appreciate the logic he brings to his arguments. He tries and succeeds in bringing factual and historical evidence to his claims. It is certainly interesting and an eye opener to LEARN, not believe, the mystery of human origin.
@FarmacyPhlaverd : Thank you so much for those extremely kind words of praise. It's people like you and moments like this that make what I do especially worthwhile...... Lloyd
In 1196, Melik al Aziz employed workers to deconstruct all of the 3 pyramids of Giza. After 8 months, Aziz saw that only minor damage had been done to the smallest one, giving the order to stop.
To move one of the blocks, it might require the might of 1000 hands to set the stone with such precision. There simply would not have been enough room around the stone.
In Tiahuanaco, Bolivia, a site built at 12,000 feet above sea level. With the quarry 90 miles away, it took something other than
Good point here. If stone age people could build these incredible monuments, it should be a piece of cake for us. Clearly it isn't. There has never been a demonstration of how one of these stones could have been quarried and moved with primitive tools. Two questions which remain unanswered, after all the talk about this are, "How did they do it?" and "Why did they bother?"
@daveharpe exactly! I couldn't agree more, but my scientist dear husband says that they did it with a lot of slaves! I say, how did they feed such a huge number of slaves for so many years? No food = dead slaves. Still he says it can be done, he is a scientist and he really believes that ancient primitive people with no cranes and modern tools built the pyramids and all the mega structures of the ancient times! :-)
@evakent3 Maybe you should challenge your scientist husband to design an experiment that proves his point. One very serious argument against the slave theory is the fact that the number of slaves needed to slide one of those 100 ton stones into place is much greater than the number of slaves who can actually get anywhere near the stone, and some stones are even bigger than that. I have never seen a real life, workable explanation of how these massive stones were quarried and moved.
@daveharpe Also, if I had been one of the people who engineered the means to do this, I would have been very proud of the brilliance and creativity of the method I worked out, and would have seen to it that some of those hieroglyphics showed how it was done. They showed so many other things about life at that time, but this is totally absent. I have always wondered about that. To me, that, and the water marks on the Sphynx show that these structures probably already existed at that time.
every lloyd pye video ive seen is funny,informative, well researched ,eye opening and makes us question what weve been told...the lack of even acknowledging lloyds(and others) by the scientific community is startling....our newspapers will report where kim kardashian ate last night but not the starchild skull...
its quite obvious certain powers dont want people to be enlightened...
whats the harm in CONSIDERING an alternative view..
I bet if one put big wedges that also serve as levers in the contour then one can get the obelisk to break free. Far from what one would be looking for but it would have a relatively smooth surface. Rocking it from side to side one could fill the hole with sand after that and the big stone would float to the top.
@gabydewilde : I've heard some crazy theories about how lifting the unfinished obelisk might have been done, but yours is the winner by far. You should go to Google images and check out photos of its size.
I'd like to know Mr Pyes opinion on Coral Castle. Love the sense of humour going down too. You see the Pyramids of Giza on tv, in books and on YouTube all the time. But when you actually see them with your own eyes, it really hits home. They are MOUNTAINS of stone. The biggest puzzle on planet earth. The 'experts' brush 'em off with a quick easy explaination and I find that bittery insulting to my intellect. The way the Egyptian government and officials runs the Giza site is disraceful too.
@JEKAZOL : I'm confident Mr. Leedskalin could not possibly have built the Coral Castle in the way the mainstream contends, just as the Great Pyramids were not built by conventional means. All of it had to be done with anti-gravity technology of some kind, and I believe Leedskalin had a UFO encounter experience at some point in his early life during which he accessed, or was given, the secret of it.
Just giving you a "Hello" because you popped up on my main page. I hope you are doing well and I am looking foward to the next book I will get.
TheWaterlily2012 3 weeks ago
@TheWaterlily2012 ; Take your pick! And thanks for your interest!
OfficialLloydPye 3 weeks ago
thank you for everything; U ar the MAN!!!!
primuseklips 3 weeks ago
@primuseklips : You are MOST welcome for those kind words! Hearing from people like you makes up for all of the negative, critical, hostile messages. Much appreciated!!!
OfficialLloydPye 3 weeks ago
An interesting quick lecture on magaliths. Perhaps the current crop of Egyptologists should be replaced with engineers? Strictly speaking, engineering is the core of megalith problems. Whatever megalith that is there, we have to focus on answering questions in the form of -- is it humanly/engineeringly possible?
Waterflux 4 weeks ago
@Waterflux : Some megaliths, but not nearly all, could be replicated today. Stonehenge might well be doable now. However, put into the time and place ALL of them were supposedly created, there is little doubt humans then could not possibly have done them.
OfficialLloydPye 4 weeks ago
@OfficialLloydPye : Look up Wally Wallington from Canada. He built a stonehenge replica by himself using only simple tools and leverage. Really takes the mystery out of how it could have been done by anyone.
purelyprimitives 3 weeks ago
@purelyprimitives
Ooops. Sorry, Wally Wallington is from Michigan and not Canada. Just search here on YouTube to see videos of him at work. He's an amazingly clever man who figured out how to move very large blocks (several tons) with very little effort. Really worth a look.
purelyprimitives 3 weeks ago
Hi Lloyd!
Man I'm so glad you're still hard at it. I haven't had much time to keep digging around. But just today a cousin come over, He had many Q's, He knows I've been working on thing's like this. We had went through many topics, before ending them on you're page, Cause he had to go. But he will be a future visitor I'm sure. He had no ideal about some of the thing's I have on my page & yours.
You probably don't remember talking to me, but I will never forget it. Thanks again. Take care.
Snowman374th 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos
@Snowman374th : I'm glad you both found things to consider in this area of knowledge, and I'm grateful my work was able to add significantly to your discussion. Keep at it!!!
OfficialLloydPye 1 month ago
Your so right -the old saying it takes many hands to make light work can`t even fit here it would take thousands with ropes and fulcrums all around this stone to lift it the mass on the ropes around it would be an impossible size .
MrMrtiki 1 month ago
@MrMrtiki : A wise, astute observation! Thanks!
OfficialLloydPye 1 month ago
Is this really Mr L.Pye himself?
Dont mean to sound naive. Lol
4477waz 1 month ago
@4477waz : Last time I looked I was me.....so far, so good!
OfficialLloydPye 1 month ago
I just can't seem to find the entire Megalithic lecture. Where is it, don't stifle it, and I am always wanting to see it. You don't know what a good deed you would be doing to show us your Megalithic structure video despite the internet and YT.
TheWaterlily2012 1 month ago
@TheWaterlily2012 : It's an excerpt from a lecture done in Australia five or six years ago. I don't know where the original lecture video can be found. Perhaps through Nexus Magazine. It was done at a conference they organized. Okay?
OfficialLloydPye 1 month ago
@OfficialLloydPye Well that might be an impossible task then. Sheesh. This part is good though. I guess we take what we can get.
TheWaterlily2012 1 month ago
@TheWaterlily2012 : I have plenty of lectures available on Youtube, plus the Starchild and Intervention Theory eBooks, both of which are excellent if I say so myself! ;-) And if you're interested in Bigfoot, I have a new novel being made available as an eBook today!
OfficialLloydPye 1 month ago
@OfficialLloydPye Yes, and I've watched all of the ones available and hope others will as well. Did you see that picture of Bigfoot on the Coast 2 Coast website? If so, what did you think of it? It sure will be nice when all of the truth comes out on the Extraterrestrials. They have been here and are still here. I'm not sure if they really want to be known to everyone though. Your ET skull is unique, though I also like those elongated ones in Peru too. One had these HUGE orbital sockets.
TheWaterlily2012 1 month ago
@TheWaterlily2012 : Yes, I saw it. Unfortunately, it could be photoshopped, and as long as that is the case, that will be the default conclusion. And, yes, the coneheads in Peru are hugely important, no doubt about it.
OfficialLloydPye 1 month ago
@OfficialLloydPye That's what I thought you would say. He looked a bit too cheery for a real one too, lol. I wish the best of luck to you with the Starchild and that guy in Peru who is trying to do DNA on his red-headed elongated skulls. I missed my calling in life, for I would like nothing more than to dig around in archaeological ruins and look at skulls all day. If I ever win the lottery, I'm investing it in such things as these. :)
TheWaterlily2012 1 month ago
@TheWaterlily2012 : Yes, Brien Foerster is the gentleman you're referring to. He's doing terrific work with the coneheads, and already is a world expert about them.
OfficialLloydPye 1 month ago
@OfficialLloydPye Yes, that's his name. There are things over there that are truely baffling. Like those huge stones with the perfect round holes in them no one can figure out? If I can ever get out of this country that's one place I want to go to see such things in person.
TheWaterlily2012 1 month ago
@TheWaterlily2012 ; I wish you the very best with that plan and dream. I'm sure it couldn't happen to a nicer lady! ;-)
OfficialLloydPye 1 month ago
@OfficialLloydPye Thank you! You deserve the best too, and I'm sure it's coming, with or without my lottery winnings, lol. :)
TheWaterlily2012 1 month ago
Im so glad ive stumbled onto you Mr Llyod Pye. You point out the obviouse lol
You are a man with a voice!
Thankyou for setting it straight, hopefully you can pop the bubble that most people are in.
4477waz 1 month ago
@4477waz : You're most welcome! I'm glad you're enjoying my work....
OfficialLloydPye 1 month ago
Llyod...it's Christoper Dunn...sorry..I was typing too fast shorthand.
mozaikadezign 1 month ago
Llyod, I don,t know if you ever watched or read Chris Dun's work (the lost technologies of ancient Egypt + the Giza Power Plant) he has many videos here on youtube..I find after reading books and books on the subject, his is the most plausible, he is a master engineer and machinist and has studied the megaliths from an engineers viewpoint: Giza power house is amazing, you gotta read his stuff Llyod meets what you are saying.
mozaikadezign 1 month ago
@mozaikadezign : Chris Dunn is a good friend whose work I very highly respect.
OfficialLloydPye 1 month ago
I always look at it with the view that they were cutting, dressing and moving these massive stones with ease, why use such large stones when you could build the same structure with lighter smaller stones?, like we do today, we build massive structures with small bricks prefab steel etc, although we have heavy moving equipment, far in advance of what we attribute to these ancient cultures. Why would they have made it so hard, for no apparent reason?. And as for the precision, its unbelievable!.
SpeciesofNecessity 2 months ago
@SpeciesofNecessity : They did it that way because they could. The precision seems to be due to some kind of laser-like cutting devices. The size seems to be due to anti-gravity devices. And we can NOT match what they did in some cases with the heaviest equipment we have today. Plus moving the stones great distances, and often up and down high, steep hills. These are all things we can't match today.
OfficialLloydPye 2 months ago
@OfficialLloydPye Yeah thats what I think, it makes sense, Ive looked at some of the work of Christopher Dunn, He thinks ultrasonic or some sort of laser. Maybe they had a better understanding of physics that we do today. As I understand it we still don't know what gravity is? so to most people talking about inverse or anti gravity just makes them roll there eyes and think your some wacko nut job. They wont even consider it. Its like modern science is backwards.
SpeciesofNecessity 2 months ago
@SpeciesofNecessity : Modern science is shockingly ignorant of the vast majority of fundamental knowledge about the universe and its actual workings. They are as ignorant today as clerics were 500 years ago. They know more, yes, but it's no more correct than the old beliefs in a flat Earth or an Earth as the center of the universe.
OfficialLloydPye 2 months ago
Lloyd Pye, why are you so hostile to people who ask fair questions such as a plea for evidence? Maybe you should smoke some weed, chill out and watch some Stargate...?
brokenclockist 2 months ago
@brokenclockist : It's not the questions or the pleas for evidence, it's the aggressive tone of questioning, or just jerky comments like yours that I feel no need to respect.
OfficialLloydPye 2 months ago
Your work is logical with far fewer gaps than the current commonly accepted theory. Imo, if doesnt make logical sense, somethings off. Even at 14yrs I asked questions that couldnt be answered without the obvious logical answer being given- instead we were given a load of dribble followed by its a matter of time. Coming across your work was like the lights being turned on in a dark room, the more u dug the more solid it gets. Keep up the good work, you have many people behind you & your work :)
Ponytoad 2 months ago
@Ponytoad : Thanks for those kind words of encouragement. It is people like you who make it worthwhile to have to tolerate the idiocy of dunderheads like SkepticalAaron and others further down this string. One perceptive fan like you balances out ten skeptics who don't bother to check facts, who just shoot from the lip when anyone challenges any dogma promoted by the religion of mainstream science.
OfficialLloydPye 2 months ago
@SkepticalAaron : Okay, then, I'll go ahead and call you stupid because you obviously are, and you're looking for a fight as well, so you have one. The divots and pitting you mention are indeed sometimes taken by researchers, but in other cases they have been chipped out by souvenir hunters over the past couple of thousand years. I mean, really, your average moron could figure that one out, couldn't they? Why can't you?
OfficialLloydPye 2 months ago 5
@OfficialLloydPye the answer is simple, because he is not your average moron!
jalidav1 1 month ago
@jalidav1 : You're right, of course, which is what I was pointing out!
OfficialLloydPye 1 month ago
@OfficialLloydPye just thought i would highlight the point though, in case he didn't understand
jalidav1 1 month ago
@jalidav1 : I think he understood, but it doesn't hurt to highlight it as you did....
OfficialLloydPye 1 month ago
@OfficialLloydPye you can never be too sure with these mega morons.....this could go on a while, great work btw, just watched your starchild lecture, thank you for opening minds
jalidav1 1 month ago
The only thing "obsurd" is the obsurd amount of information you left out. How come,for just one example,when you have your slide of the unfinished obelisk up, you don't talk about how the top of it has those in your face round divots in them and what they are? If some super precise machine from aliens was carving out the obelisk,then how/why did it leave the top full of round divots? How come the channels surrounding it are divot-ed out trenches and weren't cut by the precise alien technology?
SkepticalAaron 2 months ago
@SkepticalAaron : Your tone doesn't deserve a respectful answer, but here it is. Those making it obviously had heavy scoring machines attached to the area where they were shaping the spire. As pressure to remove the granite was applied, they pressed too hard and cracked the obelisk, after which they unhooked and moved on. As for the divots, those were most likely cored by modern researchers learning what they could about the stone and why it might have cracked under "normal" circumstances.
OfficialLloydPye 2 months ago 6
@OfficialLloydPye Its ironic you talk about tone when during your whole video you spoke very condescending and you like to remark how stupid people are. You didn't really answer my question,you just restated your video,so I'll ask again. Why if there were precision machines-more precise than today- would everything else be so pitted and full of divots? Also,other sites,not just the obelisk are full of these marking,you're making up that they are created by modern researchers.
SkepticalAaron 2 months ago
@SkepticalAaron
Skeptical? No, I don't think so. If you were skeptical, you would be asking mainstream academia for answers to Lloyd Pye's work rather than skulking around asking moronic questions and casting aspersion without any intent other than to obfuscate and disparage. Do Mr. Pye, myself, and all others who no longer accept the dim-witted proclamations that you and mainstream science offer, slink back to your ivory tower, and stick your corpulent head up your pimple laced arse. Please.
ChefClary60 2 months ago
Scientists come up with facts like ex: Humans have 96% of ape dna and then they come up with a hypothesis that its evolution but they use it as proof and decide to teach it in schools.
Then ppl who are brainwashed view you as a conspirasist and uneducated because you go against what being taught in schools. Mainstream are deciding what scientists should say. Its a fixed system. If this was ruled by sincere ppl we could have been far more advanced. Mr Pye i admire your work. Need more like you
levedia 2 months ago 2
@levedia : Thanks for these very kind words, I really do appreciate them!
OfficialLloydPye 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
An actual STARGATE/PORTAL-THING was caught on film in New Mexico. The footage can be found within the short-film entitled "SUDDEN PORTHOLE", which is parked at the PROJECT CAMELOT YouTube page (it's under the George Noory video).
I'm not selling anything…I'm just trying to spread the word about the unseen-dimensions we find ourselves embedded in.
My BLOG contains peripheral data regarding the movie and is where I reply to the "debunkers" (use search words "SAM ZURICK" & "BLOG"). THANKS!!
peopledick 4 months ago
The other obvious question is the stones that made the pyramids, must of been mined or quarried from somewhere so there must be a very big hole somewhere even after all this time
Marcus538 5 months ago
@Marcus538 : The limestone was mined in the same area. The pyramids rest atop a gigantic limestone outcrop. The huge granite slabs inside it were mined 600 miles to the south.
OfficialLloydPye 5 months ago 2
Llyoyd, I find your theories very convincing. I'm leaning tword your pov but forever a sceptic I do my own research. I saw nova carve and raise an obelisk with primative tools, not as big as the unfinished obelisk but non the less??
psycologicalnudity 5 months ago
@psycologicalnudity : When you say "not as big," that is an understatement the size of a great pyramid. I know the show you're referring to, and their efforts were a joke compared to those who cut and move and raise true megalithic stones around the world. It's like saying if you can pick up a brick and set it in a wall, you might just as easily lift and place one of the Trilithons at Baabek. Never gonna happen.....
OfficialLloydPye 5 months ago
You don't need too add time too the sphynx just add the great flood and it explains why there was water when there should not have been.
korzon 5 months ago
@korzon : Actually, there probably was a "great" flood in history. But there is a big difference between weathering from a "gully washer" effect from a flood, which is at the angle of the flow, and the steady dripping downward, and running downward, of water from rain. The Sphinx is unmistakably from rain and its aftereffects.
OfficialLloydPye 5 months ago
@OfficialLloydPye I can understand that.When you look at the side walls there are cuts in them going downwards.But the grand canyon itself is proof of a flood as well.Too bad scientists don't care for real investigation.As they can tell us they have DNA from neanderthal bones then why can't they test the DNA from that starchild skull?Seems anything out of place with their evolutionary scale they ignore it because they are afraid of what they might find obviously.
korzon 5 months ago
@korzon : Scientists are certainly not on a quest for truth that tends to contradict any of their many dogmas.
OfficialLloydPye 5 months ago
@OfficialLloydPye Just like in 1986 when I graduated they said for a fact that the moon formed from the earth and for 40 years taught that till now.Because the suposed samples do not even match those of earth.Either they don't know how too properly investigate evidence or they are just plain liars.And for a foreighn body as the moon to be pulled perfectly into orbit is impposible.Not too mention the moon gives us tides and sustains life here.They ignore what they can't explain thats not science.
korzon 5 months ago
@korzon : What can anyone say beyond agreeing that you're 100% correct. What science does is not actually what science is supposed to be. They cover their asses and call that science.
OfficialLloydPye 5 months ago
@OfficialLloydPye Not only that they cover their asses they come up with one theory scrap that and come up with a nother stupid one just too seem they know something.They change their theories like skid stained underwear.All a PHD. is being a parrot repeating what you were taught even if that theory is unsound and proven wrong later.The only thing I have ever seen evolve so far is technology and that is from direct intervention.So obviously any changes in biology have to be a direct intervention
korzon 5 months ago
@korzon : We can beat up on them all day long for the erroneous paths they follow. You're right, they're wrong. Simple as that.
OfficialLloydPye 5 months ago
The last bit about the unfinished obelisk basicly proves in 2 minutes, without a doubt, that official history is wrong, and whoever did this obelisk must have had advanced technology. Not saying the other things dont, the obelisk just made the biggest impression. You dont make it like that if you cant cut it loose and get it up, and well that seems to be quite a difficult task.
DaDawg4real 6 months ago
@DaDawg4real : You're right, this is a wonderfully obvious proof that the "official" explanation is dead wrong.
OfficialLloydPye 6 months ago
@DaDawg4real They would have too suspend it while cutting in order too break it free thats for sure and we can't even do it today.I would love too see those moron myth busters try and pull it off so I can laugh my ass off when they can't.We might be able to move stones like stonehenge back then but certainly not the Megoliths.
korzon 5 months ago
Lloyd Pye why do non-Africans have 1%-4% neantherdal dna? Indigenous Africans lack Neantherdal dna.
GhostGrind 6 months ago
@GhostGrind : That's a very good question, and the results are too new and possibly incomplete to be sure that they don't. Still, it would seem the situation would be the other way around, with Africans having more than non-Africans, IF--and of course it's a big IF--humans actually evolved from Neanderthals from Africa, as is believed.
OfficialLloydPye 6 months ago
@OfficialLloydPye Thanks for responding. Everything you know is wrong was a good read by the way.
GhostGrind 6 months ago
@GhostGrind : Glad to hear you enjoyed it! Thanks for letting me know....
OfficialLloydPye 6 months ago
lloyd, I really appreciate your views and you have really opened my eyes. I've never been the type who likes to follow the pack (of sheeple), and I've always liked to think outside the box. Everything you say seems to fall into place, much more naturally than what I've grown up thinking. You can add one more supporter to your list
Thank you sincerely, from the Great White North
mjsmtih204 7 months ago 3
@mjsmtih204 Well said...Strange how when someone uses common sense and logic, can accept the truth a little easier. Most people fear this(truth)...it goes against their belief or their teachings and stand firm about the science to prove these theories. I like to keep that open mind and what Lyod,graham,Sitchin..etc say, is easier to believe.
thetexanfan 7 months ago
@thetexanfan : You make a very good point.
OfficialLloydPye 6 months ago
@thetexanfan Not only is it easy to believe, on an emotional level, but there is EVIDENCE for it. Not as much as we'd like but at least there is some. There is no missing link, and there never will be. What you say holds true for politics and the lies we're fed by the educational system and media. It's all a big white wash. You name the subject - freedom, terrorism, ufos, nutrition, etc. etc. feel free to add to the list!! lol
carlonbass 6 months ago
@mjsmtih204 : I'm glad to hear you think I'm on to something. I have to agree with you!
OfficialLloydPye 6 months ago
*moment of profound revelation* Lloyd, I'd heard you mention in your lectures about all domesticated animals being engineered as well, but couldn't wrap my mind around it until now. Suzla1 commented on this and the ideas of them being a comfort, OR a pest killer in the case of cats, and all of the obvious uses for dogs makes complete sense! I suppose conventional wisdom is that we (humans) bred them for purposes, but I like your hypothesis better! Do you cover this in your book?
carlonbass 7 months ago
@carlonbass : Sorry to be slow responding to this. Was gone for a few days. But, yes, I do cover many of those things in my book, EYKIW, but not the combination of traits in cheetahs. That came to me after the book was published.
OfficialLloydPye 6 months ago
@OfficialLloydPye I had read about your comments on cheetahs. If I'm not mistaken, you make the claim that every cheetah is a clone. Correct me if i'm wrong. Is there scientific evidence for this? If so, wouldn't that be like a smoking gun? At the very least for SOME kind of genetic meddling, without specificity on who.
carlonbass 6 months ago
@carlonbass : I don't say they ARE clones, I say they are LIKE clones. They are very much genetically alike, more than any other species I'm aware of among the higher animals. And, yes, this is a kind of smoking gun that the mainstream avoids trying to deal with. They say cheetahs somehow went through a very tight "genetic bottleneck" at some point in their past, but that's ridiculous. Why them among all other big cats?
OfficialLloydPye 6 months ago
I could listen to his lectures for hours...if only I had that much extra time :-). His presentation is gripping and easy to follow. I am a multi-tasker and I just can't shake that habit, I am always thinking of what I have to do while I am engaged in something. Then when it's over I realize I missed some info, but with Pye I don't have that issue. No way humans put those stones where they are, 1 study listed how far they would have had to go to get the stones.
indibabs122275 7 months ago
@indibabs122275 'No way'? Several studies show how far they would have to go, and even more studies (real studies, not 'that's silly, only aliens can do that' arguments) show how it could be done. I am not claiming unequivocally that no monolithic structure on Earth was made by aliens, but the arguments are weak and the evidence is scarce.
ianman6 6 months ago
Comment removed
tedmon11 8 months ago
Comment removed
tedmon11 8 months ago
Comment removed
tedmon11 8 months ago
It's interesting to also note that the megalyths all over the world were built to last. Every time Nibiru passes by our planet they are unaffected. No man-made structures can last forever. Even skyscrapers require weekly maintenance; other wise they would collapse on their own in a couple of years.
GhostGrind 8 months ago
My friend is an evolutionist and i'm an interventionist, we debate our points of views on this matter all the time. He says the bigfoot creatures have 46 chromosomes, because primape hair was discovered a few years ago in N. America and analysized. He claims the bigfoot creatures evolved along with us.
I tell him the Annunaki knew about all the planets in the solar system, he claims anyone can find that information out by mapping the stars.
GhostGrind 8 months ago
@GhostGrind Not the Annunaki, I meant the Sumerians.
Also I would like to point out that he claims the Sumerians knew so much because of shamanism. Does anyone believe in shamanism?
GhostGrind 8 months ago
@GhostGrind : All hominoids, including the bigfoot type, will have 48 chromosomes because they are upright walking primates. We are something else entirely, and our 46 chromosomes prove that. And the fact that the Sumerians knew about Uranus, Neptune, and Pluto makes it clear they were told about them by individuals not bound by the restrictions on typical humans 5,000 years ago.
OfficialLloydPye 8 months ago
@OfficialLloydPye So all homo species have 46 chromosomes or only homo sapiens have 46 chromosomes?
tungsten33 7 months ago
@tungsten33 : Higher primates have 48, humans have 46. The question is whether Neanderthals had 48 or 46. So far as I know, that number has not been announced by the Neanderthal genome project.
OfficialLloydPye 7 months ago
Oh god Aliens, here we go
Revival1969 9 months ago
Investigate Coral Castle in Homestead ,Florida.This man figured out the anti-gravity theory.
tedmon11 11 months ago 3
@tedmon11 : I've been there, and you're right, there must have been some anti-gravity involved in what he did. It sure wasn't ALL block and tackle, as the mainstream insists. Impossible for a man that size working alone with stones of such enormous size.
OfficialLloydPye 11 months ago
@OfficialLloydPye Yes,I agree
tedmon11 10 months ago
The stone at the Aswan quarry really highlights the impossibility of stone age tech achieving all this, how did they shape the stone? At 6:57 there's a picture of a man standing on the stone, if you look at chip marks on the tip and use the man for scale you can plainly see that they're huge! What would leave marks that big?
We all really need to stop and think...
JohnSmithWasHere 11 months ago
One has to stop and think... how were the stones in all the megaliths transported from their place of origin to their final destination, how the stones were cut with such precision and how the stones were lifted & placed accurately into position using stone age tech?
I personally cannot believe that humans did this unassisted, if they were involved at all.
JohnSmithWasHere 11 months ago
@JohnSmithWasHere : Totally agree. They're just too big and too precise to create today, much back in the primitive times they were supposedly built.
OfficialLloydPye 11 months ago
Comment removed
JohnSmithWasHere 11 months ago
Not lasers - but an advanced use of sound. MMm power generator! No I dont think so because If they had the power to cut and move rocks they already had the means to generate power. The pyramid was built with incredible magnetic properties. Incidently have you heard of what happens to people who spend a night in the great pyramid, they get very sick! You cannot fly over it either. For me it was clearly built to be functional. It was a tool to an advanced people. Why make it because you can?
benno901 11 months ago
@benno901 : I'm very sure you'd enjoy Chris Dunn's book very much. Do think about giving it a try.
OfficialLloydPye 11 months ago
@benno901 'The Pyramids' by Valery Uvarov is probably the most profound book Ive ever read. If the info in that book is real, and I reckon it is, we should ALL be building our own pyramids in our own gardens. If the info in that book is right, pyramids are key to us truly 'evolving'.
Do you know the feeling you get when you chance upon a great secret and you want to share it with the world? Well, thats what I feel when I think about that book.
Namaste X
D0W666 9 months ago
Hi Lloyd - What I know is it was built using ultrasonic cutters and anti-gravity. Technology we don't have today. Supposedly it was built in 9 years by Thoth - not Cheops. Cheops did knew how it was to be used. The great pyramid is a tool with two specific purposes. As for a date it appears that it is 17,500 or so years old, built 3000 years before the great flood. .
benno901 11 months ago
@benno901 : That's one interpretation for the Great Pyramids, and there are more than that, obviously, but I would agree with the laser cutters and the antigravity--those two aspects are virtually essential when you get down to the nitty gritty of how it was done. Oh, and mechanical boring tools, too. Check Chris Dunn's "The Giza Power Plant" for excellent analysis of the engineering problems involved and how they were overcome.
OfficialLloydPye 11 months ago
@benno901 Huh? What great flood? Where is the evidence for that?There are seashells on the mountain tops now because that land used to be underwater millions of years ago.It does not denote or imply there was a great flood.The amount of water on Earth is the same as millions of years ago, but in a different form.Ice ,liquid or gas vapor.
tedmon11 11 months ago
@tedmon11 Indeed tectonic forces over millions of years is why we find sea shells on mountain tops. The 'Great Flood' may of been due to sea levels inundating the land, 300 ft or so we are told. The bible is ultimately a book of history and records this along with other corroborating sources.
benno901 11 months ago
@tedmon11 I am sorry.the bible is NOT a book of historical facts.if thats the case, please tell me how Noah collected all ten thousand species of animals and just happened to put ALL the marsupeals in Australia ?
Ridiculous statement.
tedmon11 10 months ago
@tedmon11 I highly recommend the book "The Lost Book of Enki" by Zecharia Sitchin. It's a translation of 13 or 14 ancient Sumerian texts found in the ancient city of Ur. It will explain the whole picture. The ancient texts tell us exactly who built the pyramids and sphinx, and MUCH more. Even if you don't believe that Sitchin's translations are completely accurate, the big picture is still clear. Even if only 30% of it is accurately translated, the picture remains the same. Aliens.
hartsickdisciple 10 months ago 2
Comment removed
tedmon11 10 months ago
Pye's only argument here is that because he can't imagine how ancients could have built these structures, they must have been built by aliens. This is an unrealistically simplistic leap. It doesn't follow.
If existing hypotheses of their construction methods are flawed, why not debunk them? Instead, he just ignores them and only presents what amounts to his gut feeling.
This is only convincing to people who already agree to him. Not anyone else.
Sapieteuthid 1 year ago
@Sapieteuthid : You're right, it's basically a close-minded approach (yours) versus an open-minded approach (mine). Since humans can't recreate such structures today using the best people and equipment we have, I think it's fair to suggest aliens had a hand in it. However, you're free to believe in all the magic you need to make it happen at the hands of the primitives alive at those times.
OfficialLloydPye 1 year ago
@OfficialLloydPye On the contrary, I think I am very open minded - this is why I care about evidence and good arguments. The video comes up short. There is nothing there other than Pye's appeal to the incredulity of his laymen audience. If he doesn't even address existing hypotheses, what can an impartial observer assume but that he didn’t even do his research?
The fact that HE can't think of a way ancients could have done this means nothing to me. Why should it?
Sapieteuthid 1 year ago
@Sapieteuthid : It's clear YOU have never done a lick of research into this problem, which anyone reading your comments can see. That said, my argument is not based on MY opinion about it, but on the fact that NOBODY can come up with a plausible way for primitive people to cut, shape, move, lift, and set in place 2000 ton stones (Baalbek) of surpassing hardness. You've obviously never heard what engineers have to say about solving the problems involved. You're making an ass out of yourself here.
OfficialLloydPye 1 year ago
@OfficialLloydPye Which engineers? Could you be specific?
And I don't see on what you're basing your claim that I have never done any research. I have made no claims on the subject. All I have done is pointed out that you (or Pye, if you are not he) have not presented any meaningful arguments. Viewers are given no evidence to base their opinions on. They must either take your word for it, or not. And as someone who cares about what is true and what isn't, it's not in my nature to do that.
Sapieteuthid 1 year ago
@OfficialLloydPye I have to add that your reactionary hostility is not in the spirit of reasoned discourse. If you can't respond to any criticism without becoming annoyed or angry, you are too emotionally attached to your ideas. Do you always interpret disagreement as a hostile act?
Sapieteuthid 1 year ago
@Sapieteuthid : I deal with plenty of disagreement. It comes to me almost every day. It's the supercilious assholes like you that wear me down. That's all.
OfficialLloydPye 1 year ago
@Sapieteuthid : Which engineers? Start with Chris Dunn. His work is easy to find. And I've given nothing but meaningful arguments. No one with any sense or knowledge of the subject of megalithic edifices tries to pretend that ancient peoples created them. Only people like you, with apparently no awareness of the real facts surrounding them, make the kind of asinine statements you're making about them. Again, this is not a place for people like you who don't know their stuff.
OfficialLloydPye 1 year ago
@OfficialLloydPye Due skepticism is asinine? You have provided nothing except what amounts to an emotional appeal. That you react with such hostility to how I don't accept your argument from incredulity at face value undermines your credibility because this is neither mature nor how a true academic behaves. Do not expect thinking people to agree with you just because you say so.
Sapieteuthid 1 year ago
@OfficialLloydPye Regarding Chris Dunn, I'm now reading his website. The basis for his claim that Giza is some sort of reactor is rather elusive. Needless to say his opinions are fairly bizarre and uncommon. Are you sure that you were correct in using the plural "engineerS"? I don't imagine very many agree with his conclusions.
Sapieteuthid 1 year ago
@Sapieteuthid : Reading excerpts from Chris' website is not reading his books. When you read his books, THEN you have the right to say his ideas are "rather elusive." Just because they SEEM elusive to a dimwit like you, that doesn't mean they actually are, does it?
OfficialLloydPye 1 year ago
@Sapieteuthid : Yes, plural is definitely the word for engineers who disagree with the "official party line" of the mainstream that you're trying to spout here on a site dedicated to the opposite viewpoint. What a moron you are! Do you think you can make a valid point here without actually knowing what you're talking about?
OfficialLloydPye 1 year ago
@Sapieteuthid : My position as stated is based on enormous amounts of research by many, many people, not one of which you've heard of, much less read. So this debate we're having is not "because I say so," it is merely "because you THINK so." You're parroting what the mainstream wants non-thinking bozos like you to believe, and you have fallen for it. Please stop bothering this list with your inanities. This is for people with smarts.
OfficialLloydPye 1 year ago
@OfficialLloydPye I'm afraid if you've done "enormous amounts of research", it just doesn't show. One would expect more substantiative arguments than "look it's so big", especially if it's intended for people with "smarts". And don't think I buy that arm chair conspiracy sound bite that the "mainstream" is somehow out to suppress you. That's a pitiful excuse made by people whose claims do not survive fair scrutiny, and are unable to handle that failure.
Sapieteuthid 1 year ago
@OfficialLloydPye I'm looking into your many claims because a friend asked me to. She thought you were convincing, but she highly values my judgement.
Well, I have been to your websites, watched a number of your lectures, and I have found your evidence specious, your reasoning wishful and flawed, and rhetorical style meant to sound convincing to the sufficiently gullible. And now I learnt something of your character. You will now lose yourself a supporter.
Sapieteuthid 1 year ago
@Sapieteuthid : Listen, if you're the best source of authority your friend could turn to, I feel sorry for her. Every once in a while a stiff-backed troll like you wanders into one of my threads and shows incredible ignorance of even basic understanding of the facts at issue. Megaliths are one of the most obvious "fingerprints of the gods" anywhere in the world, and most mainstream urchins have the good sense to stay away from them. You should have followed that wise path.
OfficialLloydPye 1 year ago
@OfficialLloydPye I already expect this to be futile, but why don't you give me one piece of evidence that they were built by aliens? Just remarking on their size doesn't cut it. If you can't imagine a way sufficiently clever and dedicated humans could have built them, that's only a remark on your imagination. It doesn't follow that therefore it was aliens. Incredulity-based arguments are worthless, and people who describe themselves as "smarts" should not waste their time on them.
Sapieteuthid 1 year ago
@Sapieteuthid : By the way, if you're the "supporter" (don't make me laugh!) that I'm losing, all I can say is "good riddance"!
OfficialLloydPye 1 year ago
@OfficialLloydPye My friend is the supporter who asked me to investigate your claims, as I said. Is this failure in reading comprehension quite typical for you?
Never mind, I don't care. I already have far more then I need to convince my friend that your claims are without merit. But based on how you have demonstrated complete intolerance for skepticism and scrutiny, I can also tell her that you are intellectually a juvenile.
Sapieteuthid 1 year ago
@Sapieteuthid : Is this habit of shooting your mouth off when you haven't the foggiest idea what you're talking about typical for you? Never mind, I don't care, either. Tell her anything you want. Adios.
OfficialLloydPye 1 year ago
@OfficialLloydPye First off I'd like to say that English is not my first language so if I make mistakes, let me know. This is coming from a normal man with average knowledge of everything and it's just my humble opinion about all this stuff... To me your works and findings are a breath of fresh air for someone who never believed in either religions or the fact that we evolved from creatures who look noting like us... I've seen many debunkers trying HARD to proove you wrong (continues)
Quietdude27 11 months ago
@OfficialLloydPye But all they did was critic your stuff without bringing anything else to actually prove you wrong. They accuse you of claiming things that we ''Have to believe'' while we have to ''Believe them'' in saying you make flawed arguments. How many time I've seen debunkers saying that ufos were things like weather balloons and they were'nt sure at all about it. Yet they were accusing people of ''jumping to conclusions'' and they exactly to the same on the other side''. (continues)
Quietdude27 11 months ago
@OfficialLloydPye Your work is great and yes there may be flaws like everything else we were taught since school exists.On the other hand, it gives another explanation about humans origins and I highly respect that. So far I believe that you brought more proof and you make more sense than those who invented the ''evolution of man'' theory wich we accepted in a wimp. Thank you for your work Lloyd, I hope that one day the truth will came out...
Quietdude27 11 months ago
@Sapieteuthid : Look, you're a mainstream shill, that's obvious to anyone reading your string. Why don't you just pack up and go home? This is not a place where you're going to find any comfort. You clearly don't know what you're talking about, you've probably never studied anything relating to the engineering of megalithic monuments or working with megalithic stones, so you're making a fool out of yourself. Give it up.
OfficialLloydPye 1 year ago
@OfficialLloydPye Yeah, fair skepticism = 'shill' and 'asshole'. Such paranoia and reactionary hostility is completely typical of people whose claims do not stand up to scrutiny.
I'm afraid all I'm getting from this exchange is that you're just an average peddler of pseudoscience who covers up the weakness of his arguments by inventing pointless and implausible conspiracies against them or their ideas. You have confirmed my suspicions.
Sapieteuthid 1 year ago
@Sapieteuthid : Excuse me, but from the first message you wrote you were challenging me in a very offensive and small-minded way. You haven't deserved common courtesy since your first message, so you haven't gotten it. If you were a critic or even a skeptic, we probably would have gotten along. But you are obviously a debunker, someone who just attacks without knowing the first thing about the subject, and I have no respect for that.
OfficialLloydPye 1 year ago
@OfficialLloydPye Nothing I said in my first comment was offensive or "small-minded". It was a simple observation. Your argument in your video is, in fact, based incredulity, which makes it a piss-poor argument.
Your interpretation of this as deliberate hostility tells me that despite what you claim, you do not know how to handle scrutiny or criticism.
Sapieteuthid 1 year ago
"there were giants on the earth in those days".... men whom from heaven to earth came. are we really going to believe that pyramid building was in fashion all around the world in every country? are we really going to believe that all those stories engraved in stone ..written on tablets.. plagerized into the bible....FOR THE LAST 20,000 YEARS are all simply "Myth's" I DONT THINK SO, when will the scientific community wake up and admit .."hey I think we better re-write the human history?"
theNASAlies 1 year ago
@theNASAlies : I agree fully that human history is due for a complete rewrite, and sooner rather than later.
OfficialLloydPye 1 year ago
I totally agree with FarmacyPhlaverd. Well presented information. The Genetics video is awesome too. Only discovered Sitchin in last few months. Reading two books at a time now. Just never collectively thought about it.. Too busy earning BS, MS and PhD degrees in another science. Last 15 years just too busy making money. Remained open minded to all things however. Between this and seeing video of Outer Space Phenomenon 1 and 2, I can hardly think of anything else.
bartelmehs 1 year ago
@bartelmehs : You sound like our kind of person, the type we need to join the Invisible College. Welcome!
OfficialLloydPye 1 year ago
Aliens showed give their special presence for a special interview that would lessen your trouble! maybe we are so violent natured that they're afraid to show themselves to us. their advantage is technological.
ryancute22 1 year ago
@ryancute22 : I don't think aliens would be afraid of anything relative to us. I think we're simply beneath their concern in terms of relating to us as equals. I think we're more like zoo animals than relatives, the way chimps and gorillas are to us....at least for now. Of course, as with everything, that could be a very wrong perception.
OfficialLloydPye 1 year ago
@OfficialLloydPye ZOO ANIMALS?! Yeah, and then take us seriously if we evolve having super powers and stuff! looks there's a truth to these "SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST" thing in the Universe.not to mention they don't probably have emotions of any KIND. I just hated when we are considered as one of the young and YET underdog species to be Experiment with.
I guess the moment we see how gorillas and chimps treated could probably the way "they" treat US. Bah! humbug it is waste of time :-(
ryancute22 1 year ago
@OfficialLloydPye well, thank you so much for the reply. i hope we evolve soon to stop these bastards from pestering our Earthly Territory. even if we are genetically engineered, it's our Choice to live our lives and not the way Aliens want us to be...
ryancute22 1 year ago
WHO CARES! I wouldn't spent my whole life searching for them IF THEY ARE NOT INTERESTED in showing themselves. of course, the US government secret departments knows some stuff about it but ain't worth my time. but maybe that's why you are around to help us see that aliens intervened.
Do you think we are capable of having super powers with regards to this so called alien human hybird. i mean, all that i have heard was that skull and the Pyramids made by aliens
ryancute22 1 year ago
just cause he couldnt build a pyramid doesnt mean that others couldnt.
there are plenty people today who have no idea how to build a bird house. others of us are carving fake crystal skulls. leave the science to those who know how to build a pyramid. lolll
zebb1111 1 year ago
@zebb1111 : Your problem, apparently among many, is that you have no idea how many scientists have actually tried to build a tiny pyramid replica and failed to do that. Do some research.
OfficialLloydPye 1 year ago
Amazing line: "The pyramids were rolex watches built to the size of mountains!" I have now watched dozens of this mans videos and lectures and appreciate the logic he brings to his arguments. He tries and succeeds in bringing factual and historical evidence to his claims. It is certainly interesting and an eye opener to LEARN, not believe, the mystery of human origin.
FarmacyPhlaverd 1 year ago
@FarmacyPhlaverd : Thank you so much for those extremely kind words of praise. It's people like you and moments like this that make what I do especially worthwhile...... Lloyd
OfficialLloydPye 1 year ago
In 1196, Melik al Aziz employed workers to deconstruct all of the 3 pyramids of Giza. After 8 months, Aziz saw that only minor damage had been done to the smallest one, giving the order to stop.
To move one of the blocks, it might require the might of 1000 hands to set the stone with such precision. There simply would not have been enough room around the stone.
In Tiahuanaco, Bolivia, a site built at 12,000 feet above sea level. With the quarry 90 miles away, it took something other than
unshutoptic1 1 year ago
... strength to move 200 ton blocks over the terrain. The thin air wouldn't have been helpful either.
Also, the pyramid at the Shensi Province, China is about 1,200 feet tall! ....and is actually the most massive structure on Earth.
We are technologically embarrassed by these so-called ancient people...
unshutoptic1 1 year ago
@unshutoptic1 : Same for you and for Dave below you. Exactly correct. I can't improve a word of it.
OfficialLloydPye 1 year ago
Good point here. If stone age people could build these incredible monuments, it should be a piece of cake for us. Clearly it isn't. There has never been a demonstration of how one of these stones could have been quarried and moved with primitive tools. Two questions which remain unanswered, after all the talk about this are, "How did they do it?" and "Why did they bother?"
daveharpe 1 year ago
@daveharpe : Exactly correct, Dave. I can't improve on a word you wrote.
OfficialLloydPye 1 year ago
@daveharpe exactly! I couldn't agree more, but my scientist dear husband says that they did it with a lot of slaves! I say, how did they feed such a huge number of slaves for so many years? No food = dead slaves. Still he says it can be done, he is a scientist and he really believes that ancient primitive people with no cranes and modern tools built the pyramids and all the mega structures of the ancient times! :-)
evakent3 1 year ago
@evakent3 Maybe you should challenge your scientist husband to design an experiment that proves his point. One very serious argument against the slave theory is the fact that the number of slaves needed to slide one of those 100 ton stones into place is much greater than the number of slaves who can actually get anywhere near the stone, and some stones are even bigger than that. I have never seen a real life, workable explanation of how these massive stones were quarried and moved.
daveharpe 1 year ago
@daveharpe Also, if I had been one of the people who engineered the means to do this, I would have been very proud of the brilliance and creativity of the method I worked out, and would have seen to it that some of those hieroglyphics showed how it was done. They showed so many other things about life at that time, but this is totally absent. I have always wondered about that. To me, that, and the water marks on the Sphynx show that these structures probably already existed at that time.
daveharpe 1 year ago
every lloyd pye video ive seen is funny,informative, well researched ,eye opening and makes us question what weve been told...the lack of even acknowledging lloyds(and others) by the scientific community is startling....our newspapers will report where kim kardashian ate last night but not the starchild skull...
its quite obvious certain powers dont want people to be enlightened...
whats the harm in CONSIDERING an alternative view..
they wont..theyre afraid of the masses KNOWING
good work lloyd
Dorothysmelting 1 year ago 2
@Dorothysmelting : Thanks, again, Dorothy! And where DID she eat? ;-)
OfficialLloydPye 1 year ago
I bet if one put big wedges that also serve as levers in the contour then one can get the obelisk to break free. Far from what one would be looking for but it would have a relatively smooth surface. Rocking it from side to side one could fill the hole with sand after that and the big stone would float to the top.
Not that I believe anything anyone says :-D
gabydewilde 1 year ago
@gabydewilde : I've heard some crazy theories about how lifting the unfinished obelisk might have been done, but yours is the winner by far. You should go to Google images and check out photos of its size.
OfficialLloydPye 1 year ago
I'd like to know Mr Pyes opinion on Coral Castle. Love the sense of humour going down too. You see the Pyramids of Giza on tv, in books and on YouTube all the time. But when you actually see them with your own eyes, it really hits home. They are MOUNTAINS of stone. The biggest puzzle on planet earth. The 'experts' brush 'em off with a quick easy explaination and I find that bittery insulting to my intellect. The way the Egyptian government and officials runs the Giza site is disraceful too.
JEKAZOL 1 year ago
@JEKAZOL : I'm confident Mr. Leedskalin could not possibly have built the Coral Castle in the way the mainstream contends, just as the Great Pyramids were not built by conventional means. All of it had to be done with anti-gravity technology of some kind, and I believe Leedskalin had a UFO encounter experience at some point in his early life during which he accessed, or was given, the secret of it.