Wake up America there is a fight a brewing and it is for YOUR liberty, YOUR freedom! We need to get and keep the muslims out of control of our Country. Sharyia Law is incompatable with the US Constitution. If Sharyia law is allowed YOUR freedom is lost.
301(g) "This proviso shall be applicable to persons born on or after December 24, 1952, to the same extent as if it had become effective in its present form on that date;"
@orasis Read what I posted again. Start here and continue. "...In 1961, as opposed to TODAY, Section 301(g) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended (INA) required the following:..."
As I said earlier, "read it as many times as it takes you to get it. Obviously, you aren't getting it.
A child being born to one alien parent (ie. Non Citizen) and one citizen parent in a marital relationship, required that the sole US citizen parent to have resided in the United States for a period of ten years, five of which must have been over the age of 14. Today's version of the law has somewhat different residency requirements for the US citizen parent. But the law, as it applied on August 4, 1961, required ten years presence, five after the age of 14
Barack Hussein Obama I (dad), was a citzen and national of Kenya. He was not, nor had never been, a United States citizen. Ergo, he is the "alien" parent in this scenario. Stanley Ann Dunham (mom) was a US citizen by virtue of having been born in the US. At the time of Barack Hussein Obama II's birth on August 4, 1961, Ms. Dunham was 18 years old, having been born in November of 1942.
As such, if Barack Hussein Obama II was born outside the US or its Outlying Possessions, on August 4, 1961, then Ms. Dunham could not transmit her citizenship to her son because she failed to have accumulated the necessary physical presence requirements that the LAW (that pesky and inconvenient thing that oftentimes gets in the way of "change") demanded.
The earliese in which Ms. Dunham could have transmitted her citizenship to a child born outside the US would have been when she was 19 years of age, which was in November of 1961 and NOT in August of 1961, when Obama was born.
It's that simple. If he was born in Kenya, or anywhere else for that matter, other than the US or its OLP's,
then he is not, nor can never be, eligible to hold the office of President of the United States of America inasmuch as he does not, nor never can, fullfill the requirements of Article II, Clause V of the Constitution of the United States. It's not an optional thing, regardless of whether or not someone thinks it's fair or not. It's the law, that pesky, recurring inconvenience that seems to get in the way, time and time again
Now, the quesiton remains to be answered if he was born in Kenya or not. The State of Hawaii has weighed in and states that there is a record of Mr. Obama's birth on file in the Department of Vital Statistics. However, THAT is not enough. There are two entirely different and distinct birth documents issued by the State of Hawaii.
The first is a Certificate of Live Birth which is the traditional birth certificate we all are familiar with for children born IN Hawaii
Then there is a different document entitled Certification of Live Birth, which is issued to children born OUTSIDE of Hawaii but whose birth is registered in Hawaii pursuant to a quaint and scarcely known Hawaiian law, Hawaii Revised Statute 338-17.8. This law allows for the registration of a birth in Hawaii for a child who was born OUTSIDE Hawaii to parents who, for the year immediately preceding the child's birth, claimed Hawaii as their principle place of residence
Dunham and Obama Sr. both resided in Hawaii for the year immediately preceding Senator Obama's birth. Ergo sum, his birth, even if it occurred in Kenya, could legally be registered in Hawaii, and a Certification of Live Birth could have been issued, giving the uninitiated the impression that he was born in Hawaii when in fact, he was not.
It is misleading when the State of Hawaii states that they have examined Obama's birth record and it is valid. It could very well be the case. The ISSUE however, is whether or not he was born in Hawaii as he claims, or if he was born in Kenya. There is of course, a plausible scenario in which he could've been born in Kenya and yet have his birth recorded in Hawaii as having been born in Hawaii when in fact he was not. It's quite simple acutally
His mother could have lied. That's right. Ann Dunham could have given birth in Kenya, brought Obama back with her to the US and then fraudulently registered the birth in Hawaii. Is it likely? Who knows? Is it possible? As Sir Aruthur Coynan Doyle has written: Once you have eliminated what is impossibe, whatever remains, however unlikely, is possible.
In this case, anything is possible. And it's so unfortunate that all but one relative on Ms. Dunham's side of the family are deceased.
, who he conveniently just visited in Hawaii, is the one living relative that could possibly shed light on this subject. A simple question aksing her if her daughter went to Kenya prior to Barack's birth would end the speculation, assuming of course, her response is truthful. And therein lies the rub. With so much fraud being perpetrated by the DailyKOS, Stop the Smears, and others, it's difficult to believe anything at this point.
And isn't it oh so convenient that Obama goes to Hawaii on October 23, 2008 and the Hawaiin Department of Health, after his visit to Hawaii, issues the statement that the document they have is legitimate. The wording of their statement leaves alot to be desired. It's a non answer to a question. Yes, the document is valid. And? Was he born in Hawaii?????? Silence.
The now infamous document posted on Stop the Smears and the DailyKOS, which has been determined to be a forgery by no fewer than three court certified Forensic Document Examiners, was a Certification of Live Birth and NOT a Certificate of Live Birth or Birth Certificate. However, in an effort to obfuscate the issue, the term "Birth Certificate" has been used interchangably with "Certification of Live Birth".
Assuming that Mr. Obama has a legitimate Certification of Live Birth, the question must be asked: "Why post a forgery?" The answer is as follows:
A. There does not exist a legitimate, authentic birth document for Obama showing birth anywhere in the US.
OR
B. He does have a legitimate Certification of Live Birth issued by the State of Hawaii. However, that document shows his place of birth as being in Mombassa, Kenya and NOT in Hawaii as the forged copy claims.
What is troubling and frustrating is that Obama can, and has had the ability to do so for quite some time, resolve this matter by simply providing a certified copy of his authentic birth document. The only reason that is reasonable for his failure to do so is that he simply doesn't have a document that shows he was born in the US. His documents all show birth in Kenya.
As to his Indonesian passport, that, in and of itself, is problematic for Obama. In order to have obtained Indonesian citizenship, which is the only way one legitimately gets an
Indonesian passport, he must have renounced his US citizenship, assuming for a moment, that he was, in fact a US citizen at any time. The fact that he renounced his US citizenship in order to obtain citizenship in Indonesian also makes him ineligible to hold the office of President of the United States under Article II, Clause V of the Constitution of the United States
Look. The facts and the law, are just that, the facts and the law. Wishing it wasn't so, being upset that the law is the way it was in 1961, wishing that people wouldn't bring that pesky inconvenient issue of the law, won't change a thing. Mr. Obama, like it or not, whether you think it's fair or not, if born outside the US, is NOT, nor never can be, eligible to hold the office of President of the United States. Period. End of discussion.
i only know this part......we hold these truths to be self evident that all men are created equal that they are endowed by their creator with sertain unalienable rights,THAT AMONG THESE ARE LIFE LIBERTY AND THE PERSUIT OF HAPPINESS.that to ENSURE these right goverments are instituded among men deriving their just powers from the consent of governed :P
You know, when first conceived, it read "Life, Liberty and Property!" I wish we would go back to that, then, the keeping of arms would not be a problem!
Because of slavery, and slaves being considered to be property, they did not want to perpetuate this kind of thinking, and so changed it!
Nowadays, this is not relevant, and we should demand going back to the original version.
I think its a good point about obama's birth certificate, but It doesn't matter who you put in office the real people who run this country behind the curtain have this country locked down it doesn't matter who you put in there its not going to change anything.
"It doesn't matter who you vote for you vote for us" -Joseph Stalin
No offense, I think the video is great and the message valid however I think you haven't read the Natural Born clause of the U.S constitution...
Legally if one or both of the parents are U.S citizens and they have not renounced that citizenship their children regardless of where they are born are automatically U.S citizens.
Obama's mother was born in the U.S which makes Obama a defacto U.S citizen.
In 1961, as opposed to TODAY, Section 301(g) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended (INA) required the following: A child being born to one alien parent (ie. Non Citizen) and one citizen parent in a marital relationship, required that the sole US citizen parent to have resided in the United States for a period of ten years, five of which must have been over the age of 14.
Ummm.....the point is that until Obama produces a valid vault birth certificate, you have no proof that he was born in Hawaii.
The fact that he steadfastly refuses to produce a VALID VAULT birth certificate and has paid over $ 1million to date in legal fees to prevent the court from ordering him to do so, well, orasis, that piques my curiosity and casts HUGE doubt that he was born anywhere near America.
1. He DID produce a birth certificate if the Hawaiian authorities verified it already.
2. He's the President of the United States he doesn't have to produce anything to some no name, no power laywer.
3. You really think that Obama singlehandedly disabled all of the would-be's in Congress who could have exposed him if possible and win the Presidency?
I mean seriously this whole Birth Certificate thing is old we've seen it how many times now?
@orasis Anyone that starts a discussion, statement, comment with the letters (because it's not even a fucking word) "uMmNMNzZ" loses all credibility by default and goes into the "yumyum retard" files.
Let's get some adults into this and put the little ones to bed with a nice glass of "shut the fuck up".
Uh huh, anyways this whole thing is stupid. 1. The Republicans, if they had that sort of dirt, would have never let him win against their candidate. 2. His mother was American. 3. You can be born outside the U.S and still be President if you've been a citizen 14 years.
"neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States."
@orasis Do I need to write this in crayon in order for you to understand? Read the immigration law AS IT WAS WRITTEN DURING THE TIME IN WHICH OBAMA WAS BORN. That is the law that applies when it comes to determining his citizens status!
Today's version of the law has somewhat different residency requirements for the US citizen parent. But the law, as it applied on August 4, 1961, required ten years presence, five after the age of 14.
Barack Hussein Obama I (dad), was a citzen and national of Kenya. He was not, nor had never been, a United States citizen. Ergo, he is the "alien" parent in this scenario. Stanley Ann Dunham (mom) was a US citizen by virtue of having been born in the US.
At the time of Barack Hussein Obama II's birth on August 4, 1961, Ms. Dunham was 18 years old, having been born in November of 1942. As such, if Barack Hussein Obama II was born outside the US or its Outlying Possessions, on August 4, 1961, then Ms. Dunham could not transmit her citizenship to her son because she failed to have accumulated the necessary physical presence requirements that the LAW (that pesky and inconvenient thing that oftentimes gets in the way of "change") demanded.
The earliese in which Ms. Dunham could have transmitted her citizenship to a child born outside the US would have been when she was 19 years of age, which was in November of 1961 and NOT in August of 1961, when Obama was born.
It's that simple. If he was born in Kenya, or anywhere else for that matter, other than the US or its OLP's, then he is not, nor can never be, eligible to hold the office of President of the United States of America inasmuch as he does not, nor never can,
You are right. A Consitutional Republic OF the people and BY the people is a system of government where voices are heard by those whom We The People have hired to represent us. But when those who have been hired to work for us begin to work against us and our Constitution, then our voices are no longer heard, as is the current situation today.
That is going to stop and WE THE PEOPLE are going to stop it. The Constitution WILL BE defended against all enemies, foreign AND domestic.
So it would be a revolt against the government or rebellion with arms?that led to Castro and Stalin.. And to understand the constitution you must first understand why the founding fathers wrote it..
The "revolt" has already begun, or haven't you been paying attention to the Tea Party movement. On Sept 12, over 1.5 MILLION patriotic Americans descended on Washington DC to tell Congress that enough is enough and WE THE PEOPLE will no longer tolerate their crimes, their greed, their lies and their usurpation of our UNALIENABLE, Constitutional rights. It is the same kind of revolt instituted by our Founding Fathers which led to the birth of the first FREE nation on earth..
Lets not forget the dumbing down of Americans, not only through the MSM, but, also the fluoridation of water, which studies show how it numbs certain nerves in the brain. Hitler was the first one to do experiments with flouride on humans. The same family that funded Hitler are the same family that have control of our Academia world, especially the medical schools and training of doctors. We need to dismantle this monopoly of one family's, velvet gloved iron fist on our system, throughout.
I would gladly lead... The time for a second armed revolution has long passed. JFK was the last true AMERICAN PEOPLES PRESIDENT. When he was shot the whole country should have banded together & taken it back. The media, as it does now so it did then, brain washed the people & made them believe 'The Government' had it all under control. The problem revealed: The government is in control. Not the people.
The supreme court has ruled that the 50 states are countries with respect to each other but under the 14th amendment system you are participating in rebellion against your de jure country when you vote, through contract as well and that is why you have to pay IRS and so forth.. and are responsible for the national debt. watch all 6 vids for more info please watch?v=G1B33IvnJ4M
Use the freedom that you were born with, while you still can, to do something and HELP US HELP YOU!!
I AM WITH YOU, but you must stand up and be willing to take risks. RISK EVERYTHING! WE DO, SELFLESSLY! Convince our Generals, and we will have change.
You guys do NOT hear me. It is virtually IMPOSSIBLE to have a successful coup or revolution in ANY country w/o the support of that country's military. We are trained for battle, and no military in the world is better trained than the US Military. We follow orders, to the death. However, there are many of us who, if we had a voice of our own, would say we are not happy with the Chain of Command or the politics we are FORCED to defend. You have to convince GENERALS!
Who are our Generals, please. Do we have many? The U.N. has tried to infiltraitor our military. Messing with their minds, through messing with their priorities. The U.N. Charter is not a valid/legal Constitution like America's Constitution. Our U.S. Constitution is legal through the ratification of the peoples. U.N. had no such process in the making of their Charter Constituion. We need to wake up everyone else.
We're in trouble, that's for sure. Obama has obviously fooled many people, but his record, is past and it it's associations, speak for themself. Well done. Thanks.
Bottomline: I was born a freeman...and by the grace of God I intend to die that way. Not as another mans slave...and that is exactly what Obama wants to do...enlsave us! Just like his Puppet Master George Soros
If I charge, follow me. If I die, avenge me. If I retreat, kill me!
pyramidheadkitten9 6 months ago
@hempartist420 What have you seen to prove that he isn't?
MultiJesusfreak33 10 months ago
Wake up America there is a fight a brewing and it is for YOUR liberty, YOUR freedom! We need to get and keep the muslims out of control of our Country. Sharyia Law is incompatable with the US Constitution. If Sharyia law is allowed YOUR freedom is lost.
wgrudows 1 year ago
*facepalm*
301(g) "This proviso shall be applicable to persons born on or after December 24, 1952, to the same extent as if it had become effective in its present form on that date;"
Ann Dunham was born in 1942.
orasis 1 year ago
@orasis Read what I posted again. Start here and continue. "...In 1961, as opposed to TODAY, Section 301(g) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended (INA) required the following:..."
As I said earlier, "read it as many times as it takes you to get it. Obviously, you aren't getting it.
LibertyThree 1 year ago
@orasis: Please read the following as many times as it takes you to GET IT!
LibertyThree 1 year ago
In 1961, as opposed to TODAY, Section 301(g) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended (INA) required the following:
LibertyThree 1 year ago
A child being born to one alien parent (ie. Non Citizen) and one citizen parent in a marital relationship, required that the sole US citizen parent to have resided in the United States for a period of ten years, five of which must have been over the age of 14. Today's version of the law has somewhat different residency requirements for the US citizen parent. But the law, as it applied on August 4, 1961, required ten years presence, five after the age of 14
LibertyThree 1 year ago
Barack Hussein Obama I (dad), was a citzen and national of Kenya. He was not, nor had never been, a United States citizen. Ergo, he is the "alien" parent in this scenario. Stanley Ann Dunham (mom) was a US citizen by virtue of having been born in the US. At the time of Barack Hussein Obama II's birth on August 4, 1961, Ms. Dunham was 18 years old, having been born in November of 1942.
LibertyThree 1 year ago
As such, if Barack Hussein Obama II was born outside the US or its Outlying Possessions, on August 4, 1961, then Ms. Dunham could not transmit her citizenship to her son because she failed to have accumulated the necessary physical presence requirements that the LAW (that pesky and inconvenient thing that oftentimes gets in the way of "change") demanded.
LibertyThree 1 year ago
The earliese in which Ms. Dunham could have transmitted her citizenship to a child born outside the US would have been when she was 19 years of age, which was in November of 1961 and NOT in August of 1961, when Obama was born.
It's that simple. If he was born in Kenya, or anywhere else for that matter, other than the US or its OLP's,
LibertyThree 1 year ago
then he is not, nor can never be, eligible to hold the office of President of the United States of America inasmuch as he does not, nor never can, fullfill the requirements of Article II, Clause V of the Constitution of the United States. It's not an optional thing, regardless of whether or not someone thinks it's fair or not. It's the law, that pesky, recurring inconvenience that seems to get in the way, time and time again
LibertyThree 1 year ago
Now, the quesiton remains to be answered if he was born in Kenya or not. The State of Hawaii has weighed in and states that there is a record of Mr. Obama's birth on file in the Department of Vital Statistics. However, THAT is not enough. There are two entirely different and distinct birth documents issued by the State of Hawaii.
The first is a Certificate of Live Birth which is the traditional birth certificate we all are familiar with for children born IN Hawaii
LibertyThree 1 year ago
Then there is a different document entitled Certification of Live Birth, which is issued to children born OUTSIDE of Hawaii but whose birth is registered in Hawaii pursuant to a quaint and scarcely known Hawaiian law, Hawaii Revised Statute 338-17.8. This law allows for the registration of a birth in Hawaii for a child who was born OUTSIDE Hawaii to parents who, for the year immediately preceding the child's birth, claimed Hawaii as their principle place of residence
LibertyThree 1 year ago
Dunham and Obama Sr. both resided in Hawaii for the year immediately preceding Senator Obama's birth. Ergo sum, his birth, even if it occurred in Kenya, could legally be registered in Hawaii, and a Certification of Live Birth could have been issued, giving the uninitiated the impression that he was born in Hawaii when in fact, he was not.
LibertyThree 1 year ago
It is misleading when the State of Hawaii states that they have examined Obama's birth record and it is valid. It could very well be the case. The ISSUE however, is whether or not he was born in Hawaii as he claims, or if he was born in Kenya. There is of course, a plausible scenario in which he could've been born in Kenya and yet have his birth recorded in Hawaii as having been born in Hawaii when in fact he was not. It's quite simple acutally
LibertyThree 1 year ago
His mother could have lied. That's right. Ann Dunham could have given birth in Kenya, brought Obama back with her to the US and then fraudulently registered the birth in Hawaii. Is it likely? Who knows? Is it possible? As Sir Aruthur Coynan Doyle has written: Once you have eliminated what is impossibe, whatever remains, however unlikely, is possible.
In this case, anything is possible. And it's so unfortunate that all but one relative on Ms. Dunham's side of the family are deceased.
LibertyThree 1 year ago
, who he conveniently just visited in Hawaii, is the one living relative that could possibly shed light on this subject. A simple question aksing her if her daughter went to Kenya prior to Barack's birth would end the speculation, assuming of course, her response is truthful. And therein lies the rub. With so much fraud being perpetrated by the DailyKOS, Stop the Smears, and others, it's difficult to believe anything at this point.
LibertyThree 1 year ago
And isn't it oh so convenient that Obama goes to Hawaii on October 23, 2008 and the Hawaiin Department of Health, after his visit to Hawaii, issues the statement that the document they have is legitimate. The wording of their statement leaves alot to be desired. It's a non answer to a question. Yes, the document is valid. And? Was he born in Hawaii?????? Silence.
LibertyThree 1 year ago
The now infamous document posted on Stop the Smears and the DailyKOS, which has been determined to be a forgery by no fewer than three court certified Forensic Document Examiners, was a Certification of Live Birth and NOT a Certificate of Live Birth or Birth Certificate. However, in an effort to obfuscate the issue, the term "Birth Certificate" has been used interchangably with "Certification of Live Birth".
LibertyThree 1 year ago
Assuming that Mr. Obama has a legitimate Certification of Live Birth, the question must be asked: "Why post a forgery?" The answer is as follows:
A. There does not exist a legitimate, authentic birth document for Obama showing birth anywhere in the US.
OR
B. He does have a legitimate Certification of Live Birth issued by the State of Hawaii. However, that document shows his place of birth as being in Mombassa, Kenya and NOT in Hawaii as the forged copy claims.
LibertyThree 1 year ago
What is troubling and frustrating is that Obama can, and has had the ability to do so for quite some time, resolve this matter by simply providing a certified copy of his authentic birth document. The only reason that is reasonable for his failure to do so is that he simply doesn't have a document that shows he was born in the US. His documents all show birth in Kenya.
LibertyThree 1 year ago
As to his Indonesian passport, that, in and of itself, is problematic for Obama. In order to have obtained Indonesian citizenship, which is the only way one legitimately gets an
LibertyThree 1 year ago
Indonesian passport, he must have renounced his US citizenship, assuming for a moment, that he was, in fact a US citizen at any time. The fact that he renounced his US citizenship in order to obtain citizenship in Indonesian also makes him ineligible to hold the office of President of the United States under Article II, Clause V of the Constitution of the United States
LibertyThree 1 year ago
Look. The facts and the law, are just that, the facts and the law. Wishing it wasn't so, being upset that the law is the way it was in 1961, wishing that people wouldn't bring that pesky inconvenient issue of the law, won't change a thing. Mr. Obama, like it or not, whether you think it's fair or not, if born outside the US, is NOT, nor never can be, eligible to hold the office of President of the United States. Period. End of discussion.
LibertyThree 1 year ago
i only know this part......we hold these truths to be self evident that all men are created equal that they are endowed by their creator with sertain unalienable rights,THAT AMONG THESE ARE LIFE LIBERTY AND THE PERSUIT OF HAPPINESS.that to ENSURE these right goverments are instituded among men deriving their just powers from the consent of governed :P
VampireLiliGirl 1 year ago
You know, when first conceived, it read "Life, Liberty and Property!" I wish we would go back to that, then, the keeping of arms would not be a problem!
Because of slavery, and slaves being considered to be property, they did not want to perpetuate this kind of thinking, and so changed it!
Nowadays, this is not relevant, and we should demand going back to the original version.
RainhadoCanto5 2 years ago
I think its a good point about obama's birth certificate, but It doesn't matter who you put in office the real people who run this country behind the curtain have this country locked down it doesn't matter who you put in there its not going to change anything.
"It doesn't matter who you vote for you vote for us" -Joseph Stalin
cheeseninja10101 2 years ago
No offense, I think the video is great and the message valid however I think you haven't read the Natural Born clause of the U.S constitution...
Legally if one or both of the parents are U.S citizens and they have not renounced that citizenship their children regardless of where they are born are automatically U.S citizens.
Obama's mother was born in the U.S which makes Obama a defacto U.S citizen.
orasis 2 years ago
@orasis you're wrong.
In 1961, as opposed to TODAY, Section 301(g) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended (INA) required the following: A child being born to one alien parent (ie. Non Citizen) and one citizen parent in a marital relationship, required that the sole US citizen parent to have resided in the United States for a period of ten years, five of which must have been over the age of 14.
LibertyThree 2 years ago
Comment removed
orasis 2 years ago
Um, the point here is that Barack Obama was born in Hawaii.
Hawaii is a U.S territory and therefore he is a defacto U.S citizen.
The state of Hawaii validated the certificate and obviously I think they know more about the certificates they create than people on the Internet. :)
Good videos though like the overall message of Liberty.
orasis 2 years ago
Ummm.....the point is that until Obama produces a valid vault birth certificate, you have no proof that he was born in Hawaii.
The fact that he steadfastly refuses to produce a VALID VAULT birth certificate and has paid over $ 1million to date in legal fees to prevent the court from ordering him to do so, well, orasis, that piques my curiosity and casts HUGE doubt that he was born anywhere near America.
LibertyThree 2 years ago
1. He DID produce a birth certificate if the Hawaiian authorities verified it already.
2. He's the President of the United States he doesn't have to produce anything to some no name, no power laywer.
3. You really think that Obama singlehandedly disabled all of the would-be's in Congress who could have exposed him if possible and win the Presidency?
I mean seriously this whole Birth Certificate thing is old we've seen it how many times now?
orasis 2 years ago
Yawn, anyways...
Mustata v. US Dept. of Justice - DeTomaso v. McGinnis - Diaz-Salazar v. INS etc etc.
If at least one of your parents is a 'Natural born' citizen, so are you you could be born in frickiking China, you're still a U.S citizen.
It's like saying if your dog gives birth in the Neighbors yard the puppies aren't yours or hers.
orasis 2 years ago
@orasis Anyone that starts a discussion, statement, comment with the letters (because it's not even a fucking word) "uMmNMNzZ" loses all credibility by default and goes into the "yumyum retard" files.
Let's get some adults into this and put the little ones to bed with a nice glass of "shut the fuck up".
PinkyWontWork 1 year ago
@PinkyWontWork
Uh huh, anyways this whole thing is stupid. 1. The Republicans, if they had that sort of dirt, would have never let him win against their candidate. 2. His mother was American. 3. You can be born outside the U.S and still be President if you've been a citizen 14 years.
"neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States."
UMMMMM read yeah?
orasis 1 year ago
@orasis Do I need to write this in crayon in order for you to understand? Read the immigration law AS IT WAS WRITTEN DURING THE TIME IN WHICH OBAMA WAS BORN. That is the law that applies when it comes to determining his citizens status!
LibertyThree 1 year ago
Today's version of the law has somewhat different residency requirements for the US citizen parent. But the law, as it applied on August 4, 1961, required ten years presence, five after the age of 14.
Barack Hussein Obama I (dad), was a citzen and national of Kenya. He was not, nor had never been, a United States citizen. Ergo, he is the "alien" parent in this scenario. Stanley Ann Dunham (mom) was a US citizen by virtue of having been born in the US.
LibertyThree 2 years ago
At the time of Barack Hussein Obama II's birth on August 4, 1961, Ms. Dunham was 18 years old, having been born in November of 1942. As such, if Barack Hussein Obama II was born outside the US or its Outlying Possessions, on August 4, 1961, then Ms. Dunham could not transmit her citizenship to her son because she failed to have accumulated the necessary physical presence requirements that the LAW (that pesky and inconvenient thing that oftentimes gets in the way of "change") demanded.
LibertyThree 2 years ago
The earliese in which Ms. Dunham could have transmitted her citizenship to a child born outside the US would have been when she was 19 years of age, which was in November of 1961 and NOT in August of 1961, when Obama was born.
It's that simple. If he was born in Kenya, or anywhere else for that matter, other than the US or its OLP's, then he is not, nor can never be, eligible to hold the office of President of the United States of America inasmuch as he does not, nor never can,
LibertyThree 2 years ago
No one took our freedom we gave it away by electing those who promised us more and gave us the barney frank.
ArticleTen 2 years ago
y do you guys want action by violence. Isn't a Republic where voices are heard instead of a coup which coups have led to communisim and dictatorship
crazyki13D 2 years ago
crazyki13D,
You are right. A Consitutional Republic OF the people and BY the people is a system of government where voices are heard by those whom We The People have hired to represent us. But when those who have been hired to work for us begin to work against us and our Constitution, then our voices are no longer heard, as is the current situation today.
That is going to stop and WE THE PEOPLE are going to stop it. The Constitution WILL BE defended against all enemies, foreign AND domestic.
LibertyThree 2 years ago
So it would be a revolt against the government or rebellion with arms?that led to Castro and Stalin.. And to understand the constitution you must first understand why the founding fathers wrote it..
crazyki13D 2 years ago
craziki13D,
The "revolt" has already begun, or haven't you been paying attention to the Tea Party movement. On Sept 12, over 1.5 MILLION patriotic Americans descended on Washington DC to tell Congress that enough is enough and WE THE PEOPLE will no longer tolerate their crimes, their greed, their lies and their usurpation of our UNALIENABLE, Constitutional rights. It is the same kind of revolt instituted by our Founding Fathers which led to the birth of the first FREE nation on earth..
LibertyThree 2 years ago
Lets not forget the dumbing down of Americans, not only through the MSM, but, also the fluoridation of water, which studies show how it numbs certain nerves in the brain. Hitler was the first one to do experiments with flouride on humans. The same family that funded Hitler are the same family that have control of our Academia world, especially the medical schools and training of doctors. We need to dismantle this monopoly of one family's, velvet gloved iron fist on our system, throughout.
GrimmMylene 2 years ago
I would gladly lead... The time for a second armed revolution has long passed. JFK was the last true AMERICAN PEOPLES PRESIDENT. When he was shot the whole country should have banded together & taken it back. The media, as it does now so it did then, brain washed the people & made them believe 'The Government' had it all under control. The problem revealed: The government is in control. Not the people.
AGGOZZUR 2 years ago 3
The supreme court has ruled that the 50 states are countries with respect to each other but under the 14th amendment system you are participating in rebellion against your de jure country when you vote, through contract as well and that is why you have to pay IRS and so forth.. and are responsible for the national debt. watch all 6 vids for more info please watch?v=G1B33IvnJ4M
Freihals1 2 years ago
Use the freedom that you were born with, while you still can, to do something and HELP US HELP YOU!!
I AM WITH YOU, but you must stand up and be willing to take risks. RISK EVERYTHING! WE DO, SELFLESSLY! Convince our Generals, and we will have change.
Yeshua001 3 years ago 15
i rather die for everything then live for nothing
primetimebeatz 2 years ago 2
You guys do NOT hear me. It is virtually IMPOSSIBLE to have a successful coup or revolution in ANY country w/o the support of that country's military. We are trained for battle, and no military in the world is better trained than the US Military. We follow orders, to the death. However, there are many of us who, if we had a voice of our own, would say we are not happy with the Chain of Command or the politics we are FORCED to defend. You have to convince GENERALS!
Yeshua001 3 years ago 9
Who are our Generals, please. Do we have many? The U.N. has tried to infiltraitor our military. Messing with their minds, through messing with their priorities. The U.N. Charter is not a valid/legal Constitution like America's Constitution. Our U.S. Constitution is legal through the ratification of the peoples. U.N. had no such process in the making of their Charter Constituion. We need to wake up everyone else.
GrimmMylene 2 years ago
Yeshua001, amen brother
Cbizzl 3 years ago 6
Gun safety tip: Always keep you gun pointed in a safe direction such as at a hippie or communist
TNrifleman17 3 years ago 2
Dont forget the greedy!
GordonALWAYS 3 years ago
LMFAO!!! bravo.
Cbizzl 3 years ago
GET OFF YOUR FAT ASSES AND START DOING PT!!!
This idea will be short lived if few of you can go at least 78 hours w/o sleep or 5 miles w/o walking.
There are those in the US ARMY who whisper revolution.
Yeshua001 3 years ago 4
I see your point! An Army that cannot maneuver, cannot win. Not all terrain supports vehicles and fuel could be cut to the citizens to rein them in.
GordonALWAYS 3 years ago 3
Count me in!
gun4blackwater 3 years ago 12
Freedom Shall Ring
PAULEB071449 3 years ago 7
We're in trouble, that's for sure. Obama has obviously fooled many people, but his record, is past and it it's associations, speak for themself. Well done. Thanks.
HDbiikerchick 3 years ago 7
OO-RAH!!!
baarzhurq 3 years ago 15
Bottomline: I was born a freeman...and by the grace of God I intend to die that way. Not as another mans slave...and that is exactly what Obama wants to do...enlsave us! Just like his Puppet Master George Soros
frankiecitizen 1 year ago