Added: 2 years ago
From: healthyaddict
Views: 12,710
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (714)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • eeee yikes, if you have to ask yourself, YES you are.... freak

  • Yes, you are.

  • You're cool you're a deep thinker like me, i analyse people quite a lot and think why are they acting like that etc. why do they hang around with that paticular group. I think social norms however have changed with society like being polite, nice and outgoing is now seen as a bad thing and in turn weird, today being cocky, opinionated and inpolite is what people like

  • you are not weird because you are friendly and want to make friends in anyway sounds to me like your very kindrid spirited and antisocial idiots who don't have a kind spirit kinda want to make you feel strange

  • I don't even have to watch this stupid video to answer that question. I definitely wouldn't say weird, but there are many other words I would use that I will refrain from using here. :D

  • You are NOT weir! You're EVOLVED!!!!!

  • She is hot!

  • You are not weird, just different, like everyone else. But with some of your angry videos, you don't look as attractive as in your nice videos. By the way, you probably know that according to research, people who live together end up in a bad relationship or separated from their partner.

  • I don't really talk to only one friend from my homeland; I don't talk anyone from High School nor college. And frankly, I only kept in touch with only a few of my army friends. It's just that, once I move on and move away, I don't really find anything to maintain the relationship.

  • Weird is ; in your face rebellion . Big eyed vloging can be overpowering to mere mortals .

  • naaw

  • Everyone is weird, some people hide it better than others.

  • Fornicator!

  • Why people debating God here --' !! I think i am just like you :/ and i don't find that weird, i mean net friends are just like "better" to me. Anyways there is nothing wrong nor weird about being different.

  • that made me sad. You are missing a lot.

  • Why are you concerned with what you or others think is or is not weird? If you're happy and not hurting anyone else, carry on your social life as you are now.

  • @MrNickape No, I wouldn't worship a god like that. But your question seems so irrelevant, because it's not like that.

  • @MrNickape My God DOES give me an afterlife as a reward and eternal happiness. That's all I know. No need to question it whatsoever.

  • @MrNickape yes, it does sound good and it's going to be like that. Believing gives you the best feeling ever.

  • @MrNickape The same as here. In the afterlife, you will experience supernatural things. But, also, it will be very fun, too. God always keeps "inventing" new things in heaven for us to do, and it will also very much be like a life on Earth too, only without the pain and suffering, and living in constant fear. You know, heaven isn't you floating around in white for a whole eternity xD there's actually a normal life up there.

  • @MrNickape 1. If I kill myself, I won't go to Heaven, I will go to Hell.

    2. Atheists, you don't even know how much fun you are for Christians to watch. It's because you're ABSURD. I am a good person because I feel better doing good things, and at the same time knowing I am going to get rewarded for it. And for you, your life is pointless. Silly atheists.

  • I'm weird, but at least I believe in God -.-'

    Here's the thing I don't understand with you atheists - if you don't believe in an afterlife, then why the hell are you even living your life when it doesn't even matter? Why don't you kill yourselves or do bad things just for fun? Why do you keep morals if it's obviously of no use if you believe there is no God or life after death, therefore you believe you can't be punished? Silly atheists. I only show respect for agnostics, they're smarter.

  • to wilbrit09: by the way, dogs are best friends ONLY with good people probably would chew your face off

  • please tell me where you got the 'doubt' medalion as I would love to get one.

  • you are not weird, you are brilliant

  • to: wilbrit09: That is your comback to her? lol

  • You are very wierd. & ugly. I feel bad for ya.. I'm sure your bf is a dog.

  • ive got to admire someone who is subjective and out going. they are the ones who see life in more than just what they expect of it.You are a curious gal and that is not bad at all.

    as they say...seek and you shall find!

  • Yes, you're weird. Not that that's a bad thing... :)

  • Weird doesn't describe you, more like disgusting. i guess your boyfriend gets ugly chicks with big knotty dark moles on the base of their necks. you're gross.

  •  I think a good question would be Why do we care about whether or not we weird? I think there is much to learn from this concern and also from the meaning of weird, what does it really mean?

  • yer it basically says you have no life

    just one question did you run out of eye liner i hope you did and dident just do it to there under your eyes as it looks ridiculous

  • yer it basically says you have no life

  • Your not werid, but it seems you got some problems

  • the miracles of Jesus are historical events that are documented adequately with all the makings of strong history. the enemies of Jesus attest to his miracles albiet they attribute them to evil magic. u arent wierd since you are like most of your peers. you are a child of satan destined for hell unless u repent which is highly unlikely

  • @j919or Delusional CRAP

  • Your social existence is of no interest, and of no relevance, to us.

  • either all of us are weird or none of us are. it makes me sad when people obsess about themselves being weird. be happy who you are. if you're a rational individual then dont worry about it.

  • I don’t think you are weird at all, I can see that you are intelligent person who is looking for the truth, you might go away from it with your scattered thoughts, but I am sure eventually you will find the right track. Keep on reading and gathering more information about what is cooking in your mind.

  • everyone is a little weird..but you're just wrong.

  • I pretty much experience the same thing. I think there are more people like that. It is not much different as from during the seventies, the fact was noticed that people didn't know each other living in the same apartment block, but knew people in other cities. It just elaborated to the web.

  • Define Beautiful...

  • No you're not - you're just not afraid... Like I am - I'm afraid I think I love you!!!x 8^)

  • nice!!

  • Bill Wiese - 23 Minutes in Hell

  • Oh and by the way I think the reason behind it is online you get to know a person, not the mask they wear.

  • Well if you're weird so am I. Cheers :D

  • It CAN'T be a beautiful day in sunshiney Ohio because, this place doesn't exist! Don't look now but, you're starting to see the works of the Lord Jesus, King of ALL Kings! :-D

  • You have to ASK? Heh heh! That's USUALLY an indication!

  • HealthyAddict, dont doubt yourself.

  • @TheDAO2011 Does she like protein? Heh heh! Anchovies? :-D

  • OKCancel or Post or Create a video response

    Yo this girl is a whore I picked her up one day walking home from her burger king job and she wanted to get laid I gave her $30 and I gotta admit it wasnt to bad.

  • Hey Ashley you're cute! I love watching your videos.

  • @FallofDarkness55 So, ALL of your B.S. that you post on here is just to defend Ashley, hoping that she'll like you and you can worm your way into her pants? Heh heh! Don't waste your time, she doesn't do apes! :-D

  • @Patriot042 Shut the fuck up! I respect girls; maybe you don't. All I said was she's cute, moron! 

  • @FallofDarkness55 She'll NEVER do a dweeb like you, Bubbles (Michael Jacksons chimp!) Stick to your hairy palms and get a NEW pair of glasses!

  • @Patriot042 Nice insult! LOL!

  • It's getting less weird everyday! I recently posted a video of a song I did about teachers and have made lots of connections with people. I used to hang out with the same people for years and years, but we're not interested in the same things anymore. By the way, how do you put up with these incredible morons commenting on your site. Do you just attract inbreeds?

  • @Greygower The theropy must be working? Or NOT?

  • when was the last time you took a shit I swear it looks like your craping all over yourself and I keep telling you to pop those fuckin pimoles and brush your teeth and hair your so plain looking you have a boyfriend damm he must be one desperate dude.

  • she cures herself a year later... i'm still looking to run into the video of the youtube get together event, 6/18/2010.

  • ur stupid not weird who cares what ur saying

  • I love her eyes..

  • it only gets wierd when you have world of warcraft friends lmao hahhaha i only have a handfull of friends you dont need 2000 friends you just need 5 really good friends and it is good to have a mind of your own instead of being a cow just follow the heard and plus your hot and have a bf i'm jelious of him lol

  • You are not weird! What's weird, anyway? I think you worry too much about it. Just do what you feel comfortable with, do what makes you happy and to hell with how something looks. Especially how it looks to others.

  • You really need to get over yourself.

  • You're not weird ! Be safe ..., it's any chance I can get u skype, I'm in Japan and will be great to talk sometimes with someone like u! Peace

  • you are not weird . technology hasnt caught up with your needs yet. when there is a day in future when there are holographic video chat you can set up your friends live holos on chairs in your living room and drink chat with them, you will feel less weird

  • your not weird its good to be independent

  • @Alkhemist10 FAG

  • @mrabdullah71 Typical Muslim. All that comes out of your mouth is hate and ignorance. The mouth speaks when the heart overflows. All I hear you say is fag fag home cum sucker. That must mean you are all those things. You are an ignorant bastard. Go beat your wife or stone a child like you muslims do. Wait I have a better idea, go blow yourself up. That is God's way of getting rid of you crazy mother fuckers.

  • @Alkhemist10 Oh you claim you KNOW God huh? You r a filthy sodomite AND you know it you claimed you would kick my ass I gave you name and phone number Be a man come do it filthy fag

  • @mrabdullah71 When did you give me your name and phone number? I don't recall. Your pathetic. Go troll someone else.

  • @Alkhemist10 YOU ARE A LIAR I GAVE IT TO YOU UNDER SUPERKINGOFNIGERIA U KNOW I DID LOOK WEAK ASS PUSSY GET LOST

  • nope not weird. you chose a alternative method of being social.. that is growing and more and more everyday.. so you are good

    be safe,

    PEACE!

  • maybe just a little.. 

  • Weird or not, it's better than simply being unable to make friends.

  • Weird as defined by statistical averages, maybe.

    Weird as defined by "bad" or "not liked", no way! <3

  • You are not weird youre absolutely gorgeous mi amore!!!

  • And what does that matters what others think, wheter it's weird or not?

    If you're happy with that, that's totaly ok.

  • You don't believe magical sky dady... you're not weird!

    by the way, lucky boyfriend.

  • Comment removed

  • @interestedinscience. You are asking people what they think of your personality which is an ambiguous thing to measure, and full of personal idiosyncrasies. The Dunning-Kruger effect indicates that most are not accurate self-evaluators. However, that is only true when you assume everyone has your understanding. Firstly, you're on Youtube. Secondly, you have a strong understanding of "psychology and neuroscience", clearly you should know what is normal. You just want attention! Egomaniac!

  • You do not seem to care that others see you talking to yourself. That might indicate that your confidant, an ego maniac, or arrogant. You do not seem like a deep thinker because your asking others to elaborate on your state of mind, when in reality you're the best person to answer your own question. Instead of classifying your self as some interesting type of weird I am inclined to conclude self absorbed, and as such can not have meaningful relationships.

  • DOn`t think so.As long as social Contacts occure on a regular Basis, who cares if it`s online? Adding the Point, that you have a Boyfriend (or had, whatever), which makes a huge social Plus as well.

    Therefore, simply No.You`re not.

  • Get a chance to married sexy Asian girl lushfmlk.info

  • after watching another vid, I can tell you that you are somewhat demeaning and disrespectful to others, that's not going to help you win friends, if you are even interested in having friends idk.

  • Jesuits. learn about them.

  • I doubt you're weird. It's easy in the modern world to keep in touch and become friends with people from anywhere in the world - I know, I have friends in New Zealand who I met on World of Warcraft. Friendships aren't limited by geographic distances anymore. Perhaps you just hang out with people who don't really resonate with you on a really deep level because hell, who wants to hang out by themselves all the time?

  • u are weird and ulgy as hell :)

  • In response to the video; if you are genuinely looking for actual opinion's and not just dropping the line of self-pity as bait, so that sycophants drop compliments that ultimately derive your self-esteem, whilst exploiting philanthropy to confer your pseudo-selflessness thus moral vanity, then my answer would be no; you are similar to a lot of people in your age range; Narcissistic.

  • Your fricken awesome, thats what!

  • Yes, you are weird. Good. "Normal" people are boring. I do not really have any friends, so I can not comment on that part. I am not that likable, lol.

  • OOOOOOOOHHHHHHH you are lady, you are.

  • It's like hot-weird.

  • I think you are becoming the norm. The internet is changing our culture so fast, it's phenomenal. I feel I am the same way I have friends online that I connect to more than anyone I know locally. It's not because I don't try to or hedge myself from person to person contact. The chances of you meeting someone that you truly click or connect with on the internet from all over the world versus doing this within the limits of your local socials/city/county/state what have you is so much greater.

  • I have always wondered the same. I have never really had any permanent clicks, as such. I have met people in real life at events and bonded well with them but they have never become a permanent part of my social life. I also have found most of my social life resides on the internet with activists who I share common beliefs with. I think its only weird to the average. So because you aren't average you shouldn't feel weird, you should feel awesome that you aren't another sheep :)

  • WHO CARES !?!?

  • no, what ever makes you happy, and always follow excitement

  • You are not weird. You are exactly what you were always meant to be. Free will is a lie. Will is caused, just like everything else. We are biological computers. With no soul or spirit, you kinda default to that philosophically. It's all "physical" and natural.

  • you know what?...your weird because you don't believe in GOD...

    if i know...your histrionic...having a personal disorder!!!

  • Yes you are wierd and cute.

  • I understand completely why you don't have any friends, with that IQ I'm astonished that you even enrolled into college.

  • @WhoAreYouKid1 your right...thumbs up!

  • @WhoAreYouKid1 Who the hell are you to disparage her IQ, you creepy fuck?

  • @douglasjcox You're about two months late you fucking simpleton, do society a favor and kill yourself you failed abortion.

  • @WhoAreYouKid1 Awww...got your panties in a wad, little creepy fundie dipshit. Very Christian of you. Just like all religious weirdos, you can dish it out but you can't take it. You come on Healthy's site and disparage her for no discernable reason (I'm guessing her IQ is twice your IQ) and when someone calls you on it, you cry like a little bitch.

  • @douglasjcox Hahahaha I find it funny that you make blatant assumptions about my ethnicity and overall persona. I'm not Christian I'm Pantheist and you seem to adopt the bias, feeble minded stature of a Christian. I can undermine her IQ because quite frankly she's an idiot, idiots tend to defend other imbecilic bastards. You're pathetic, and I know my IQ and I believe its higher than both hers and yours. Seeing as you utilize childish insults and make it quite apparent you have no integrity.

  • @WhoAreYouKid1 Yeah, whatever Internet tough guy. Bragging about your alleged IQ merely suggests your insecurity. Your postings demonstrate your lack of intelligence. Frick off, loser.

  • @douglasjcox Using words that don't exist, because you're too cowardly to say fuck is truly an implication of your low self esteem. It insinuates that you have no confidence and therefore contradict yourself and your beliefs, you're a joke kid, give up.

  • @WhoAreYouKid1 Okay, have it your way. Fuck off, loser.  Feel better?

  • @douglasjcox It takes you 4 days to fabricate such a blatant unworthy rebuttal such as that?

  • @WhoAreYouKid1 Gee, maybe it takes me four days because, unlike you, I have a life and I don't always have time to sit on my ass in front of a computer making snarky comments. So, dipshit, let's call a spade a spade. You obviously think you are some sort of genius asshole, so what, with specificity, makes you make conclusory allegations about healthy addict's intelligence? What did she say that you disagree with?

  • @douglasjcox So because I get on the computer for 20 minutes I have no life? Your logic is flawed. What did she say that I disagree with? Perhaps the fact that she discriminates against those who believe in God without any objective evidence that a omnipotent entity of such could exist. She's pro abortion, endorses prostitution, she has absolutely no integrity, and falls back on cognitive dissonance and desertions that are above all extraneous.

  • @WhoAreYouKid1 Just as I thought. How does she discriminate against believers? She's simply expressing her opinions on Youtube. And belief in something without objective evidence desires to be examined and perhaps even ridiculed. That doesn't equate to discrimination. She's pro-abortion. So what? A great deal of people are pro-choice, at least until the third trimester. This says nothing about intelligence. You disagree with her views. But this says nothing about her intelligence.

  • @douglasjcox Toe to toe with the best of them and have practically debunked every theoretical desertion that there is no God. As for Pro-Choice, any organism in its most simplistic compound is life. You're desecrating life, focusing on the stage of development is irrelevant. Abortion is merely a transaction of an irresponsible individual, stop making mistakes, and be more punctual and cautious when participating in sexual intercourse and this wouldn't happen, child birth should be...

  • @WhoAreYouKid1 I'd like to here these theoretical desertions you speak of. There are really only 3 formal "proofs" for the existence of god. The cosmological, teological, and ontological. They all have flaws. The burden of proff is on you to prove there is a god or gods.

  • @douglasjcox I'm writing a paper on it when I'm finished I'll PM you it, its too long to explain here and now. Theological arguments are utilized by Atheists to this very day, in fact thats all Atheists use is theories which contain no objective evidence and are baseless. They are leaps of faith, which are unsubstantiated and are not the least bit eminent. Ontological arguments stem from the same tree, cosmological theories are only flawed in one aspect and that is the theory of a multi-verse.

  • @WhoAreYouKid1 What "theories" do atheists use to prove there is no god? There is no such thing. I don't believe in god, fairies, or unicorns for the simple reason is that there is no empirical evidence that such things exist. When you say atheist "theories" are you talking about the Big Bang? Evolution? These are scientific theories with a great deal of objective evidence, but they say nothing about the non-existence (or existence) of gods.

  • @douglasjcox Okay, one yes I am referring to these "theories." Regardless of the so called "objective evidence," that you claim is there but actually isn't. If the big bang were substantiated at all, perhaps it could tell us where the matter that created this Universe, stemmed from. Or "Natural selection," which is a theory that scientists have disowned due to the fact that the Cambrian Explosion blew it out of the water, yes Atheists due cling to theories with no eminent evidence at all.

  • @WhoAreYouKid1 The Cambrian explosion? That's your argument? You claim to be a pantheist, but your arguments are nothing more than typical Christian creationist nonsense. You try to sound intelligent, but you don't know the meaning of the words you use. You use phrases like "atheist desertions." I think you mean "dissertations," but that doesn't really fit either. Do you know what the word "eminent" means? I don't think you do.

  • @douglasjcox Hahaha you've resorted to insults, you're sounding more and more like Healthy every day. The cambrian explosion is a creationist argument, which only Christians use? Okay then I guess thousands and thousands of major scientists are creationists, because they dissented from Darwinism with no regrets at all. Eminent means important or significant. It was a mistake, don't fret over it, I have to type quickly because I'm eager to disprove the remainder of your baseless arguments.

  • @WhoAreYouKid1 There are NO eminent (note the correct use of the word) scientists that believe that the Cambrian "explosion" dispproves evolution. This is why I have no further interest in debating you. It is a waste of my time because your understanding of science (and the theory of natural selection) is at the level of a child. Educate yourself. The Talk Origins website would be a good place to start.

  • @douglasjcox You truly are daft, thousands of major scientists with PhD's from prestigious Universities and all have concluded that Darwinism isn't credible at all, and Darwin's tree of life didn't match the complexity of the fossils discovered.

  • @WhoAreYouKid1 You don't have a clue what you're talking about. I suspect you've never taken a basic biology couse. Evolution via natural selection is the bedrock of modern biology.  Nothing makes sense in biology without it. Who are these scientists from prestigious universities? Kent Hovind? Michael Behe? William Dembsky?

  • @douglasjcox If we take the Multi-Verse into consideration then we must account for numerous figures. Such as where the matter that created these Universes, propagated from. Chance becomes more likely, which is an argument Atheists seem to cling to. Other than that, cosmological theories, present above all facts, it isn't at all hypothetical.

  • @WhoAreYouKid1 What do you mean we must account for numerous "figures?" If your god always existed, why couldn't matter and energy have always existed. Matter and energy cannot be destroyed. It's not chance at all. the universe works according to specific natural laws. I don't think you have any understanding at all about what atheists actually think. You are the one presenting strawmen.

  • @douglasjcox The fact that if an inconceivable amount of Universes did exist, chance would be quite probable, in turn endorsing your strawmen theories. Where did this matter stem from, you're telling me that different proportions of matter each pertain to its assigned Universe? Its highly unlikely.

  • @WhoAreYouKid1 I'm not saying anything of the sort and frankly, what you are saying makes no sense whatsoever. I don't know where matter and energy came from and neither do you. You claim they came from "God." So where did God come from? You didn't answer my question. If "God" (for which we have no evidence of his existence) is eternal, why couldn't matter and energy be eternal? You don't need string theory or a multi-universe theory for this to be.

  • @douglasjcox I'm simply saying that if the theory of a multi-verse were correct, where did the matter that created all of those Universes stem from. We're talking about potentially an infinitesimal amount of Universes, all of which cannot be accounted for. Where did the energy, that all of these Universes are comprised of stem from? Matter and energy are eternal so if they're eternal are they God? One of the aspects of an omnipotent entity, would be immortality, which means they aren't subject..

  • @WhoAreYouKid1 Sigh, it's difficult to have any kind of debate with you because your level of scientific knowledge is obviously incredibly shallow. I am talking about the First Law of Thermodynamics. Matter and energy can neither be created or destroyed but can assume the other form. Matter and energy is not god(s). They are simply matter and energy period. That is all you need to create a universe.

  • @douglasjcox That doesn't answer my question why can't God be comprised of only matter and energy?

  • @douglasjcox to demise, destruction, etc. So since energy and matter, are impervious to these laws, is god composed of matter and energy. Is God purely energy?

  • @WhoAreYouKid1 You don't need to bring string theory or the multi-verse into the argument.  If matter and energy always existed then there is no need for the supernatural. You don't really understand what a "strawman" argument is. It doesn't sound like you've ever taken a logics course.

  • @douglasjcox I actually do, and I actually have. You seem to be missing the entire point. If there are multi verses then the laws we are subject to may not apply in other Universes, then our knowledge of the origin of life, once again decimates.

  • @WhoAreYouKid1 The stage of development is not irrelevant. A fetus does not have brain waves until the third trimester. Hence, this is the cut-line for me as brain activity indicates a sentinent life form. Yes, it is a "life" before then, but a blastocyte is life. A sperm cell is "alive." So, I draw the line at a different point than you. We disagree. Doesn't say anything about my, yours or Healthy's intelligence.

  • @douglasjcox It actually does, when she prances around calling people simpletons and using blatant insults because some people believe abortion is wrong, thats where I draw the line. This is an implication that her way of thinking is right, and ours is wrong, hence fascism.

  • @WhoAreYouKid1 Oh please. Facism? Hyperbole much? You disagree with her opinion. You don't like what she says about believers. It's a free country and she has free speech rights, same as you. If you think otherwise, then I suspect you may have some facist tendencies.

  • @douglasjcox Freedom of speech? Thats the hyperbole, so the Bill of Rights clearly condones, insulting others for their beliefs, which is offensive towards many. You can only say what you like if it doesn't desecrate the liberties of others. Healthys videos, case and point.

  • @WhoAreYouKid1 Actually, the First Amendment only applies to actions of government. But that aside, you are one big pussy. How does Healthy posting her opinions "desecrate the liberties of others?" It doesn't. You are just a pussy who can't handle contrary opinions. Now fuck off.

  • @douglasjcox It insults others beliefs and in turn desecrates their liberties. I'm a pussy, kid you haven't seen a pussy in your life other than the one displayed on your computer screen. Secondly it doesn't apply to the transactions of the government, thats the constitution(and this is how I know you're an idiot). Since there have been cases of individuals, "expressing their freedom of speech" and dressing up as Osama Bin Laden on the highways of major cities and getting arrested because its...

  • @douglasjcox Offensive towards others! You fucking simpleton.

  • @WhoAreYouKid1 Yeah, I know about the First Amendment, skippy. I'm a civil rights attorney and litigate First Amendment cases every day. If you look at my above post, you'll see that I explicitly stated that "the First Amendment only applies to actions of the government." The point I was making is that Healthy hasn't violated any of your imaginary rights. You disagree with her. Well, tough shit, and cry me a river.

  • @douglasjcox Look at the comment below.

  • @WhoAreYouKid1 Given that I've been married for over 20 years and have 2 kids, I think I'm pretty familiar with the vagina. But, if you get your panties in a wad because you disagree with someone's video on Youtube and whine that it "desecrates [your] liberties" (whatever the hell that means) then you are indeed one huge pussy and you've proven you're not a very smart one either.

  • @douglasjcox Thats amusing seeing as once again your entire argument consisted of bronzed aged, nonsensical bullshit that wasn't substantiated in the very least. You put forth absolutely no evidence to why Healthy's videos, aren't offensive, and failed to preserve her "intelligence." You have a limited knowledge of our countries laws and the rights we maintain. You try to save yourself from certain failure on both the insult that you're a feeble minded virgin and that you don't know the bill of.

  • @WhoAreYouKid1 What argument consisted of "bronze age bullshit?" I don't know what country you're from (Dumbfuckastan would be my guess), but in the US it is not a crime, nor a violation of the constitution, to express your opinions on Youtube and offend pathetic little shits like yourself.

  • @douglasjcox Wait, wait, wait. That case is completely irrelevant to the entire argument, they won, on the grounds that the school violated their first amendment right of free speech. Not because one was more plausible than the other. It didn't even involve the Discovery Institute, the case was between the school district and some Freshman from a local Highschool. An "ass-whooping" would be if you presented me with a debate between noteworthy scientists that promote Darwinism that ended in...

  • @WhoAreYouKid1 I thought I had moved on to another issue. I believe our arguments are out of order. In any event, the Dover trial was about the establishment clause of the First Amendment. The court determined that teaching intelligent design in a public school violated the establishment clause because intelligent design is NOT science, it is religion.

  • @douglasjcox The Dover case had everything to do with the Discovery Institute, the organization behind pushing a "new" form or creationism known as intelligent design. Behe and Fuller were the defense "experts" and they are both affiliated with the Discovery Institute. Dembski, Campbell, and Meyer were also supposed to testify but they chickened out when they saw the way the case was going. Did you read Judge Jones opinion?

  • @douglasjcox It isn't a religion, intelligent design condones the idea that there is a creator, if you did any strenuous research you'd know it doesn't follow the fundamentals of a monotheism or polytheism. It gives no insight to the name or definitive identity of the God. No scriptures from which the teachings or morality of the religion are derived. No insight to what happens when you die. No consequences for sinning. So intelligent design is not a religion, it doesn't meet the definitive...

  • @WhoAreYouKid1 Again, you don't know what you're talking about. You've never read Judge Jones opinion, have you? If you had or if you knew anything about the history of the so-called "intelligent design" movement you'd know that its simply creationism dressed up in a cheap suit. Have you never heard of the "Wedge Document?" The very idea of some sort of uncaused creator is a religious concept, not a scientific one. Intelligent design is not science because its not falsifiable.

  • @douglasjcox Intelligent design, presents objective evidence, something the Atheistic community rarely does. I've already explained how it is not a religion, since it does not meet the definitive criteria of a monotheism or polytheism. So in what aspect is it a religion, if it doesn't resemble one or hold the generic philosophy of one?

  • @WhoAreYouKid1 William A. Dembski, when asked in an interview whether his research concluded that God is the Intelligent Designer, stated “I believe God created the world for a purpose. The Designer of intelligent design is, ultimately, the Christian God”. Devon Williams (December 14, 2007). “CitizenLink: Friday Five: William A. Dembski”. Focus on the Family. Retrieved 2007-12-15.

  • @douglasjcox Thats preference, and is above all extraneous. Dembski's personal opinion is that the designer of Intelligent design is the Christian God. This hasn't been widely accepted by the DI. And everyone shares his or own interpretation on the true identity of God, for Dembski, its Jesus. Christianity can be debunked by doing strenuous research on the bible, which contradicts its moral philosophy and the Koran in which Jesus admits he isn't the son of God. You'd know this you you....

  • @douglasjcox did research on all monotheisms, a typical atheistic tactic, bash Christianity and only Christianity.

  • @WhoAreYouKid1 Actually, if you knew any atheists, you'd know that most of us tend to think all religions are equally absurd. You might notice that I didn't bash Christianity, I only pointed out that the Discovery Institute uses the pseudo-science of intelligent design to teach the Christian creation myth under the guise of science. Dembski is one of the founders of the so-called intelligent design movement. Hence, his opinion reveals the true purpose behind the movement.

  • @douglasjcox Believe me buddy I know many Atheists. My best friends are Atheists, and I can with full confidence say you discriminate against one religion and only one religion, that being Christianity. Atheists focus so much on Christianity, degrade it, desecrate its scriptures, and ridicules anyone who believes its philosophy, and fails to do strenuous research on other monotheisms. Have you read the Koran or are you familiar with the teachings of Theravada and Mahayana? I presume not however

  • @WhoAreYouKid1 Well, you'd be wrong. And ridicule of beliefs is not discrimination. If your atheist friends focus on Christianity its likely because they live in a country where 80% of the population professes to be Christian. Hence, Christians have a lot more daily effect on our lives than other religions, whether its pushing creationism into public schools or opposing stem cell research. Have I read the Koran? Some. Do I buy into it? Nope. I think all supernatural beliefs are absurd.

  • @douglasjcox That may be the case and it is logical to believe so, but its merely an excuse for a lack of diversity and research. You must account for all aspects of monotheisms and stating that you focus on Christianity because it is so profound within our country is an excuse above all. Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus etc all dwell within this country, since it is a melting pot, do they not?

  • @WhoAreYouKid1 I don't really understand what your point is. Are you trying to say that unless I have a deep understanding of all religions, I can't criticize a religion's belief? I don't accept the supernatural, period. I don't need to know everything about Hinduism, Buddhism, or Islam to reject their beliefs that are based upon the supernatural.

  • @douglasjcox Straw man? I know plenty of Atheists, even famous ones, who know a lot about religion, because they've studied it in order to justify their argument. You and a select few, discriminate against one, and exclude the rest, hence hypocrite. Do you want to know why? Because in your eyes, you hate Christians, for the lack of a better analogy I'll describe, your animosity against Christians to that of the south towards African Americans circa 20th century or the S.S soldiers towards the...

  • @WhoAreYouKid1 You are an idiot. Stop ascribing beliefs to me that you know nothing about. A have a great many relatives that are Christian, including my mother and father. I guess I hate them. Questioning supernatural beliefs is neither hate or discrimination. And guess what? By comparing being skeptical to "hate" and to slavery, you've created a "strawman" argument. Now, quit using it incorrectly, you fucking moron.

  • @douglasjcox I'm using straw man, no my friend you are? So you're bringing your family into this? You're always going to love your mother and father, regardless of their beliefs. You're simply moving the goal post one step further, any personal matters involving your relationship with your family is irrelevant. I'm referring to people you do not know, which would provoke, such anger and animosity. Since you do not know them personally and wouldn't care much about them.

  • @WhoAreYouKid1 Idiotic. You can't win an argument so you try and make critical analysis of supernatural belief into "hate." Pathetic.

  • @douglasjcox More like truth, you keep on though, you're getting somewhere, ha couldn't say that with a straight face.

  • @WhoAreYouKid1 There's no point in continuing to "aruge" with you because you just make stuff up when you realize you can't win an argument.

  • @douglasjcox Jews. Its pitiful and inhumane. Have you ever considered, a non-secular world, where we are united as one, instead of divided, no one arbitrarily forcing their beliefs on others? No you haven't, your ideal world is a world without religion, through force, or violence probably, because thats the only way to rid the world of such things.

  • @WhoAreYouKid1 Again, you're creating strawman arguments. What makes you think I want others to stop believing in certain things as long as their beliefs don't impact me? Engaging in hyperbole and attributing motives to others without evidence is the last refuge of someone who can't win an argument.

  • @douglasjcox No its through careful observation of prior atheists I've had debates with and they all share the same temperament. I'm implying that you are the same, because from what I've seen in this argument you are. You're merely avoiding the true nature of things by asserting that you are an outlier and you aren't like the others, when really you are. And you've made that quite clear, from the very beginning.