Added: 6 years ago
From: aremik
Views: 39,304
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (30)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Nossa esse jogo foi vergonhoso, meteram a mão no guga !!!!

  • Federer is the best because is the most complete player in tour.

    second. 16 grands slams 16 master series.

    and federer doesnt depend of the style of serve and voley.

    Federer is complete.

    thats why a younger federer beat sampras in grass in 2001

  • Roubado descaradamente na terra de Sampras! Sampras hj deve ter vergonha dessa vitória!!!

  • Im merely saying that Sampras on his day, was on another level than Federer, once again my opinion correct? I know Roger might break Petes grand slam record, and I will accept he is a great player, but in my opinion Pete in his heyday and zenith, was just on a completely different level of godly status

  • Agreed. At his peak, with his A game, Pete was unbreakable, unplayable, unbeatable. He was a lean mean killing machine at his height (basically when he wore those NIke shoes with the red tips).

  • haha yup 97 indoor season his special edition black and red nike osciallate shoes. My background pic on my profile is exactly what you are talking about!

  • Alright firstly I am entitled to my opinion like you said, so there is no need to try and attack my opinions. Federer will not win Roland Garros, and although he has reached it 3 times, you cannot deny the competition he had en route to the final was a joke, once he met a suitable competitor, looked what happened, he won 3 games in the entire match vs Nadal this year? You cant say pete was a second rated player on clay, when he too won prestigious clay tournaments

  • LOLLERCAUST @ this incorrect prediction. Federer > Sampras.

  • yea another level below sampras

  • what a stupid smile from sampras. He is a nerd!!!

  • ahhh!!!i dont wanna die please dont hurt me bambi..i hav asore peny and your balls look feirceand wholesome..

  • why Kuerten became so angry?? i don't remember this match

  • Its because he had many opportunities and failed to capitalize on his chances.

  • Guga war robbed in this match

  • i saw that match. kuerten had his chances. he melted down in the latter stages and got way down on himself.

    you can see him slam down his racket on match point.

    great match.

  • SAMPRAS KING ALWAYS THE BEST, FEDERER IS NOTHING LIKE HIM

  • bambi is a retarde. ignore this gay!

  • Kuerten not only ended up number one that year but also he won the French Open

  • to bad he retired already

  • he had too many injuries! I played against him back when I was 16, and to this day he was my toughest opponent, good old days!!!I Played against him in 1993 in the quarter-finals of a Junior Brazilian Championship the result was a 6x4,6x4 to Gustavo Kuerten!! I would never think he would win a Grand Slam or be number 1 in the world, to this I am very surprise he went that far!!

  • shut up !! omg y do you lie

  • come on bambi,do you live in brazil? ? if so I can tell you the city, the tournament, the month, the year I played against him, even what kind of surface i played against him, even what kind of racket he played against me!!!

  • ok good

  • nope PETE is a GOD....and it was meant to be

  • kuerten should've won.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more