Just out of curiosity, who currently runs the twcjr44 channel, as in who is writing the replies to these comments? Because I get the distinct impression sometimes that it isn't Tom writing the replies, is that the case or? Either way many thanks for the uploads, these videos help so many people.
There are several people who have logon rights to this site so they can post and prune, and help maintain the site -- but I doubt that any but me would answer a question unless the question was only seeking a mundane fact like "where do I find such and such" or "Why isn't my audio working for the last upload".
There are several people who have logon rights to this site so they can post and prune, and help maintain the site -- but I doubt that any but me would answer a question unless the question was only seeking a mundane fact like "where do I find such and such" or "Why isn't my audio working for the last upload".
so the guy who sees the fallen tree gets eaten by the bear and a second guy goes into the woods and doesn't see the fallen tree because there's now no data...
so what if the first guy then communicates from spirit to the second guy and tells him about the fallen tree... would that cause a conflict of reality?
No conflict is caused. Consistency of available information that is considered objective within PMR is the only issue. A message from NPMR is subjective (not generally available for anyone to see) and thus fails the "objective information within PMR" test.
Nice theory but such a structured reality sounds like a very frightening place to exist, for a prime consciousness more complex and perhaps more powerful than the individual "I" having such control over that "I" may violate that I's free will and intent to create a reality of it's own design and choosing.
Apologies in advance. Im still quite new this all of this. I have clinical depression such as chem imbalance. If I can get out of body, will I feel diff at all? And would I be able to heal myself? , Iv been trying to learn how to go out of body but havnt had much success. if anyone could point me in the right direction to some good RELIABLE book, videos or other sources on this subject it would be very appreciated. Thanks!!!
What would system did if you go to folowup of hospital stays ? You ask every pacient, and probably he will remember if he stayed in hospital for 2 days or 2 weeks. Wout would happen ? Data woud different from "true", or system coud predict your "fallowup" and want let you change data ?
does system calculates his "escape route" back to big bang (for case we come to that planet in 1000 years and examine it) - so color on the picture must agree with substance of the planet, or he solvs that problem WHEN and IF we come to that planet and make mesurments. Offcoruse planet dont exist, its all data - but must be consistent to past database data.
When picture of deep space is taken - messurement is taken. It is mess of "past" (light travel). When thoes the sys calculates before states ? I dont mean every second - but it must have some way to "reserv" all pasible before states. In 1000 yrs, we maybe go to that planet, examine floor, and everything must be consistent up to that "date". So if we mesured how atoms, and molecules are behaving, it must be consistent to that on far planet. So when we take picture of depp space planet,
About dead tree. Bear eats guy. When new peson walks into wood - why would sys calculate again prob ? Guy is dead - but it is easyer for sys to recall last value (dead tree on floor), then to calculate wholle new prob is there tree, or not.
What is the benefit of calculating again ? i think sys can only benefit from recalling last state, inspite guy who take masurment is dead. Yes ?
Probabilities are not static but are changing all the time. If the time laps is small enough that there is near zero probability for significant change in the probability distributions defining the possible outcomes, then the system could use the previous value. However, this would only happen if the processing cost to determine whether or not the time lapse was small enough is less than the processing cost of making another random selection.
But it is not really "random" selection. Number of beer in fridge - guy forget. It is not really random, because there can be only 30beers in fridge (no space for more), and minimum is 1 beer. So system still must calculate between 2 and 30 beers, and it seems that it would be less procesing time to get "real" value from past database.
You evidently don't understand the process of "random selection". A random selection of a number between 0 and infinity is not implied. One randomly draws a number form a specific distribution of numbers that represent the probability of a given event hapening. I explain how "random selection" is done and what that term means during or shortly after the discussion of beer in the fridge.
I get the draw. But "specific distribution of numbers that represent the probability " - where probabillity curve must be calculated. Yes ? if it is not calculated than we dont know the prob of any number. First prob must be calculated - then random draw from that (range) can be drawn out of hat. Yes ?
The system could surely do that to save cycles. The normal default process is to take a random draw from the probability distribution of the possibilities that satisfy all the constraints. Whether it would take more cycles to treat this situation as a special case because of the very short time lapse between measurements or simply apply the default process is unknown. The normal process is no doubt highly optimized but your suggestion would seem the more efficient to me.
What about something called "universal mestake". System calculates next DT that you will move leg and put on slippers. It is most probable. And mistakes happern, and you "miss" slipper, step on slippery floor and fall down. Does system calculates this mistake like most probable outcome, or he calculates putin on slippers, and you foling down "suprises" the system ?
Depending on the circumstances, it could go either way -- system predicts accident, or accident is the result of a random event. However, before it is over, it is probably a conbination of both since calculations are every 10 to the minus 44 seconds.
As soon as the volunteer video editors can find the time between the cracks of their busy lives to process the raw footage from 3 cameras into one video and then get through the very lengthy upload pross required to get the edited video posted.
As per your suggestion (and of course my own desire) I am in the middle of reading your trilogy, which I bought some months ago. Unfortunately I'm not a very fast reader (haven't improved that yet) and have very little spare time. But I'm very impressed by what I read so far and can't wait to see how your Big TOE can integrate in my personal experience to become my Big TOE.
I'm always eager for your next video as they invariably shed immense light into my interpretation of your books.
Cheers Tom. Great to see light workers manifesting coherent and intelligent arguments instead of new age hog wash for once. I'd love for you to upload your workshops on the spiritual side of things for once. I'll never get to hear you live so youtube is as good as it's going to get.
Just out of curiosity, who currently runs the twcjr44 channel, as in who is writing the replies to these comments? Because I get the distinct impression sometimes that it isn't Tom writing the replies, is that the case or? Either way many thanks for the uploads, these videos help so many people.
HueyTheDoctor87 1 day ago
@HueyTheDoctor87,
There are several people who have logon rights to this site so they can post and prune, and help maintain the site -- but I doubt that any but me would answer a question unless the question was only seeking a mundane fact like "where do I find such and such" or "Why isn't my audio working for the last upload".
twcjr44 19 hours ago
@twcjr44
Ah ok that makes sense, many thanks for clearing that up.
HueyTheDoctor87 14 hours ago
@HueyTheDoctor87,
There are several people who have logon rights to this site so they can post and prune, and help maintain the site -- but I doubt that any but me would answer a question unless the question was only seeking a mundane fact like "where do I find such and such" or "Why isn't my audio working for the last upload".
twcjr44 19 hours ago
so the guy who sees the fallen tree gets eaten by the bear and a second guy goes into the woods and doesn't see the fallen tree because there's now no data...
so what if the first guy then communicates from spirit to the second guy and tells him about the fallen tree... would that cause a conflict of reality?
timetraveldvds 3 weeks ago
@timetraveldvds,
No conflict is caused. Consistency of available information that is considered objective within PMR is the only issue. A message from NPMR is subjective (not generally available for anyone to see) and thus fails the "objective information within PMR" test.
twcjr44 3 weeks ago
Nice theory but such a structured reality sounds like a very frightening place to exist, for a prime consciousness more complex and perhaps more powerful than the individual "I" having such control over that "I" may violate that I's free will and intent to create a reality of it's own design and choosing.
onetruekeeper 1 month ago
I have only recently heard of Tom Campbell , makes perfect sense
Grey1671 1 month ago
Probability = statistics = speculation and conjecture.
southport97 2 months ago
i feel in my heart this guy have it right
whey80 2 months ago 4
I LOOOOOOOOOOOOVE this! =)
whey80 2 months ago
love love this one!
69Sirdragon 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Apologies in advance. Im still quite new this all of this. I have clinical depression such as chem imbalance. If I can get out of body, will I feel diff at all? And would I be able to heal myself? , Iv been trying to learn how to go out of body but havnt had much success. if anyone could point me in the right direction to some good RELIABLE book, videos or other sources on this subject it would be very appreciated. Thanks!!!
th0m3s100 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What would system did if you go to folowup of hospital stays ? You ask every pacient, and probably he will remember if he stayed in hospital for 2 days or 2 weeks. Wout would happen ? Data woud different from "true", or system coud predict your "fallowup" and want let you change data ?
borisZG55 3 months ago
Comment removed
borisZG55 3 months ago
2/2
does system calculates his "escape route" back to big bang (for case we come to that planet in 1000 years and examine it) - so color on the picture must agree with substance of the planet, or he solvs that problem WHEN and IF we come to that planet and make mesurments. Offcoruse planet dont exist, its all data - but must be consistent to past database data.
borisZG55 3 months ago
1/2
When picture of deep space is taken - messurement is taken. It is mess of "past" (light travel). When thoes the sys calculates before states ? I dont mean every second - but it must have some way to "reserv" all pasible before states. In 1000 yrs, we maybe go to that planet, examine floor, and everything must be consistent up to that "date". So if we mesured how atoms, and molecules are behaving, it must be consistent to that on far planet. So when we take picture of depp space planet,
borisZG55 3 months ago
About dead tree. Bear eats guy. When new peson walks into wood - why would sys calculate again prob ? Guy is dead - but it is easyer for sys to recall last value (dead tree on floor), then to calculate wholle new prob is there tree, or not.
What is the benefit of calculating again ? i think sys can only benefit from recalling last state, inspite guy who take masurment is dead. Yes ?
borisZG55 3 months ago
@borisZG55,
Probabilities are not static but are changing all the time. If the time laps is small enough that there is near zero probability for significant change in the probability distributions defining the possible outcomes, then the system could use the previous value. However, this would only happen if the processing cost to determine whether or not the time lapse was small enough is less than the processing cost of making another random selection.
twcjr44 3 months ago
@twcjr44
But it is not really "random" selection. Number of beer in fridge - guy forget. It is not really random, because there can be only 30beers in fridge (no space for more), and minimum is 1 beer. So system still must calculate between 2 and 30 beers, and it seems that it would be less procesing time to get "real" value from past database.
borisZG55 3 months ago
@borisZG55,
You evidently don't understand the process of "random selection". A random selection of a number between 0 and infinity is not implied. One randomly draws a number form a specific distribution of numbers that represent the probability of a given event hapening. I explain how "random selection" is done and what that term means during or shortly after the discussion of beer in the fridge.
twcjr44 3 months ago
@twcjr44
I get the draw. But "specific distribution of numbers that represent the probability " - where probabillity curve must be calculated. Yes ? if it is not calculated than we dont know the prob of any number. First prob must be calculated - then random draw from that (range) can be drawn out of hat. Yes ?
borisZG55 3 months ago
@borisZG55,
Yes, but it is more than that -- some numbers within the range are more or less likely to be drawn or selected according to the distribution.
twcjr44 3 months ago
@twcjr44
Can you say, does Bob Monroe generally agree on your MBT, or disagree, or agree on 80% ?
Generally ?
borisZG55 2 months ago
@borisZG55,
The system could surely do that to save cycles. The normal default process is to take a random draw from the probability distribution of the possibilities that satisfy all the constraints. Whether it would take more cycles to treat this situation as a special case because of the very short time lapse between measurements or simply apply the default process is unknown. The normal process is no doubt highly optimized but your suggestion would seem the more efficient to me.
twcjr44 3 weeks ago
What about something called "universal mestake". System calculates next DT that you will move leg and put on slippers. It is most probable. And mistakes happern, and you "miss" slipper, step on slippery floor and fall down. Does system calculates this mistake like most probable outcome, or he calculates putin on slippers, and you foling down "suprises" the system ?
borisZG55 3 months ago
@borisZG55,
Depending on the circumstances, it could go either way -- system predicts accident, or accident is the result of a random event. However, before it is over, it is probably a conbination of both since calculations are every 10 to the minus 44 seconds.
twcjr44 3 months ago
I hope I can hear an account of your OBE's sometime.
Anyone know the name of a video?
dreamdimensions 3 months ago
I always seem to be the only person that asks this question, so, I'll do it again.......... "when do we get the next part"
w2aiq 3 months ago
@w2aiq
As soon as the volunteer video editors can find the time between the cracks of their busy lives to process the raw footage from 3 cameras into one video and then get through the very lengthy upload pross required to get the edited video posted.
twcjr44 3 months ago 2
As long as they know how much their work is appreciated. Another great video Tom!
mcarbone80 3 months ago
As per your suggestion (and of course my own desire) I am in the middle of reading your trilogy, which I bought some months ago. Unfortunately I'm not a very fast reader (haven't improved that yet) and have very little spare time. But I'm very impressed by what I read so far and can't wait to see how your Big TOE can integrate in my personal experience to become my Big TOE.
I'm always eager for your next video as they invariably shed immense light into my interpretation of your books.
Thanks!
mikungfu 3 months ago
Cheers Tom. Great to see light workers manifesting coherent and intelligent arguments instead of new age hog wash for once. I'd love for you to upload your workshops on the spiritual side of things for once. I'll never get to hear you live so youtube is as good as it's going to get.
imhotepsol 3 months ago
amazing thanks for the upload! as always tom stunning work.
BenMinal 3 months ago
thank you Tom, these lectures of yours are really helpful and informative. I appreciate it very much
Milos
dreamspiritwar 3 months ago