Added: 4 years ago
From: teddy55555a
Views: 330
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (10)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Humankind is not an objective of the universe. There is no such thing as fine tuning.

    Don't confuse astronomy with evolution.

  • I agree with this video, although it is not the best I have seen, but I still give it credit. :)

    This is only astronamy. There's plenty of other stuff, like life science for example, proving Creation.

    Christ is King

  • how bout we shoot an arrow at you..ahjahaha

  • EXACTLY EndCredulity you dumb shit what were the fuckin odds of our planet being created and not all those others..you just proved yourself wrong you fuck

    AND THIS MUSIC IS ANNOYING AS HELL..just that id say that

  • click on the link "about this video

  • All of these odds mean nothing unless we take into account how often and how many universes DIDN'T make it. For all we know, universes could be blinking in and out like fireflies. Our universe may be one of the ones that "stuck to the wall." Until we see a failure rate, we can't rate the score of the successful universe we inhabit.

    All you are doing it shooting an arrow into a blank wall, drawing a bull's-eye around it after the fact and gasping "WOW! What are the odds of THAT happening??"

  • "For all we know, universes could be blinking in and out like fireflies"

    Thanks for refuting 'physicalism" TY come again :)

  • this is retarded

  • youre retarded

  • Einstein was adamant that there was nothing supernatural about the universe.

    It behaves and developes exactly as if there was no God.

  • click on "about this video" theres a link if you want to come and debate .

  • what natural way did the universe come into existence ?

  • In the same mechanical way in which it develops through all the stages and perhaps one day might contract again into the "big crunch".

  • This argument depends on the assumption that these constants were up for variation at some point, of which there is no evidence, and if they was the possibility of variation at some point there's no reason to assume changing one of them wouldn't have had an equal affect on all of the constants that would have had the same result. Like changing the radius of a circle, it affects the whole circle, but the end result is still a circle.

  • Oops... Typos galore...

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more