Every weak hadith unless there are not many of it is to be rejected ,it is fabricated our the transmitter is not to be trusted.
if there are hadiths which speak against islam like j3had fisabilAllah like The greatest jihad is jihad un nafs which is a fabricated hadith and it is not from the saying of the prophet
the greatest jihad is that with the sword...the Messenger (pbuh) said : Paradise is under the shade of swords.
It is here : wwwDOTsunniforumDOTcom/forum/showthreadDOTphp?29176-Objections-on-Fazail-e-Aamal-Answered-by-Darul-uloom-Deoband&s=76f22406f33aca46aa3567a7943ef0c6
@Freedom1sour1 "What fault there is in any book containing weak narrations, if the author did not take it upon himself that he will not mention any weak narrations? A study of the six famous books of Hadith will prove that they too contain some weak narrations. The vast majority of scholars accept weak narrations, especially when it is related to fadha’il" it goes against your fatawa that all week ahadith should be rejected neither does it say 3/4 are weak like you claim
If it contradicts aqae'ed it is to be rejected,when you have 100 witness who are trustful and you have 10 untrustful witness who will you take first ? the unstrustful ? instead of the trustful,there are enough authentic ahadith on fadail / behavoir...there are legacies of great great personalities...there are enough examples ...take them as your idols...and copy their good deeds.
I did not give a fatawaa on this nor im a shaykh it is my opinion as a muslim
It is well known by the words of the scholars that the hadiths used are daif,they were declared daif(weak) by the scholars of hadith , like wise bukhari,imam hakim,imam nisai, imam abu hajar al asqalani and many many others (may Allah have mercy on them).
@Freedom1sour1 we don't have the right to change some elses book. The author has not forced any of the ahadith upon anyone to follow neither has he claimed that they are authentic. funnything is you haven't answered a single question of mine with a direct answer you've have just jumped here and there.
@Freedom1sour1 again your talking absolute rubbish, who has rejected authentic hadith? your coming back with absolute and utter nonsense. not a single hadith from Fazail e Amaal turns a person away from Allah. your talking complete and utter nonsense and only showing how ignorant you really are.
so it be.Agree with hadiths which are doubtful,when the Messenger of Allah (pbuh) said : leave that is doubtful,for that which is undoubtful.Because truth brings calmness and lies,doubts.
U knw whats ruff, zakir naik praises albani bare. May Allah give us all guidance, we all need guidance, especially the misguided muslims, the shias, the christians, hindus, jews, atheist, all of humanity. Ameen.
I don't believe they should be allowed to be called Salafi, Wahhabi or Ahle-Hadith. These all imply they are on the righteous path. Just shows how this ghairmuqallid fitna is like Qadianism - they name themselves "Ahmedi" to imply they are righteous. More correct names would be psuedoSalafis, Ahle-opinion of hadith or Talafi.
Yep, they are truthful when they say that. They divide the two groups and then stay as far away from the group on the haq, and emerge themselves in groups that are batil.
Comment removed
choudry1231 2 weeks ago
@choudrysahib aap khud apneh comments ko kyu delete karteh ho? lol :)
0TruthUnveiled0 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
choudry1231 2 weeks ago
thanks really great speach and deobandi great
viqarsmail 1 month ago
@CommiexCore watch?v=yRJIcgS0_TM
0TruthUnveiled0 1 month ago
Im not salafi,im learning from the school of abu hanifa.
but Fazaile Amaal contains many many many many many weak hadiths that are not to be taken , almost 3/4 are daif hadiths.
I myself have read in it.
Freedom1sour1 1 month ago
@Freedom1sour1 where's your authority to say they should not be accepted?
0TruthUnveiled0 1 month ago
@0TruthUnveiled0
Every weak hadith unless there are not many of it is to be rejected ,it is fabricated our the transmitter is not to be trusted.
if there are hadiths which speak against islam like j3had fisabilAllah like The greatest jihad is jihad un nafs which is a fabricated hadith and it is not from the saying of the prophet
the greatest jihad is that with the sword...the Messenger (pbuh) said : Paradise is under the shade of swords.
And many more hadiths which are lies.
Freedom1sour1 1 month ago
@SHAYKHFreedom1sour1 You haven't answered my question, what I asked you was where is your authority on rejecting weak ahadith?
Now to add to that I hope Shaykh you can also answer these:
Which Shaykh gave you Ijazah to declare 3/4 Ahadith from Fazail E Amaal to be weak?
On what basis did you declare the 3/4 to be weak?
0TruthUnveiled0 1 month ago
@0TruthUnveiled0
@0TruthUnveiled0
It is here : wwwDOTsunniforumDOTcom/forum/showthreadDOTphp?29176-Objections-on-Fazail-e-Aamal-Answered-by-Darul-uloom-Deoband&s=76f22406f33aca46aa3567a7943ef0c6
Freedom1sour1 1 month ago
@Freedom1sour1 "What fault there is in any book containing weak narrations, if the author did not take it upon himself that he will not mention any weak narrations? A study of the six famous books of Hadith will prove that they too contain some weak narrations. The vast majority of scholars accept weak narrations, especially when it is related to fadha’il" it goes against your fatawa that all week ahadith should be rejected neither does it say 3/4 are weak like you claim
0TruthUnveiled0 1 month ago
@0TruthUnveiled0
If it contradicts aqae'ed it is to be rejected,when you have 100 witness who are trustful and you have 10 untrustful witness who will you take first ? the unstrustful ? instead of the trustful,there are enough authentic ahadith on fadail / behavoir...there are legacies of great great personalities...there are enough examples ...take them as your idols...and copy their good deeds.
I did not give a fatawaa on this nor im a shaykh it is my opinion as a muslim
Freedom1sour1 1 month ago
@0TruthUnveiled0
It is well known by the words of the scholars that the hadiths used are daif,they were declared daif(weak) by the scholars of hadith , like wise bukhari,imam hakim,imam nisai, imam abu hajar al asqalani and many many others (may Allah have mercy on them).
wwwDOTahyaDOTorg/amm/modulesDOTphp?name=Sections&op=viewarticle&artid=105
Freedom1sour1 1 month ago
@Freedom1sour1 basless allegations by Salafis which have been answered in the video!
0TruthUnveiled0 1 month ago
@0TruthUnveiled0
I don't say the book is at all untrustful,but also not trustful,it is in the middle of both.
I respect the author may Allah have mercy on him...but his works can be updated with authentic ahadith on same topics.
Freedom1sour1 1 month ago
@Freedom1sour1 we don't have the right to change some elses book. The author has not forced any of the ahadith upon anyone to follow neither has he claimed that they are authentic. funnything is you haven't answered a single question of mine with a direct answer you've have just jumped here and there.
0TruthUnveiled0 1 month ago
@0TruthUnveiled0
so you reject all authentic ahadith and instead you take daif(weak ) ahadith to show your islamic manners and behavoir ?
you take the oath of someone who is untrustful.
EVERY MUSLIM HAS THE RIGHT TO REJECT A DAIF HADITH IF THERE ARE ENOUGH AUTHENTIC ONES ON SAME TOPIC.
EVERYTHING THAT TURNS YOU AWAY FROM ALLAH IT IS TO BE REJECTED.
WHEN THERE ARE LIES LIKE SOME WEAK HADITHS IT IS TO BE REJECTED:
Freedom1sour1 1 month ago
@Freedom1sour1 again your talking absolute rubbish, who has rejected authentic hadith? your coming back with absolute and utter nonsense. not a single hadith from Fazail e Amaal turns a person away from Allah. your talking complete and utter nonsense and only showing how ignorant you really are.
0TruthUnveiled0 1 month ago
@0TruthUnveiled0
so it be.Agree with hadiths which are doubtful,when the Messenger of Allah (pbuh) said : leave that is doubtful,for that which is undoubtful.Because truth brings calmness and lies,doubts.
Freedom1sour1 1 month ago
@Freedom1sour1 go do some research watch?v=BKY6ESuJHUU
0TruthUnveiled0 1 month ago
@Freedom1sour1 brother I advice you to watch this vedio just from 33.05- 41.26.
Faruk1189 6 days ago
U knw whats ruff, zakir naik praises albani bare. May Allah give us all guidance, we all need guidance, especially the misguided muslims, the shias, the christians, hindus, jews, atheist, all of humanity. Ameen.
dijassta 1 month ago
great alhumdulillah need more please jazakallah
shohag64 2 months ago
Masha'Allah,my Allah ta'Allah accept your work.Ameen.
alifbatah 2 months ago
subhanallah!
JZK Halal dawa Records!
ismail4137 2 months ago
Alhamdulillah. This is what we need, our scholars need to come out and correct the people before it gets too late. Jazakallah Mufti Saab
bahmed06 3 months ago
I don't believe they should be allowed to be called Salafi, Wahhabi or Ahle-Hadith. These all imply they are on the righteous path. Just shows how this ghairmuqallid fitna is like Qadianism - they name themselves "Ahmedi" to imply they are righteous. More correct names would be psuedoSalafis, Ahle-opinion of hadith or Talafi.
oigeezer 3 months ago
@oigeezer The reply from the salafis when called 'Talafi' is that yeah no problem I am Talafi I devide the groups that are on haq from batil
MuhammedP23 2 months ago
@MuhammedP23
Yep, they are truthful when they say that. They divide the two groups and then stay as far away from the group on the haq, and emerge themselves in groups that are batil.
oigeezer 2 months ago
Salam @oigeezer
'Ahlu opinion' is nice!
ismail4137 2 months ago
May Allah bless the speaker and save us from the fitna of the oppressor Albani.
oigeezer 3 months ago
v.v.v.nice.mashallah......allah reward you.
SunniResearch 3 months ago 2
MASHALLAH GREAT LECTURE....MUCH NEEDED
MohammadWajidNisar 3 months ago 5
Mashallah good speech
TRUEsuni8ashiqrasul 3 months ago 4
Mashallah May Allah Bless This Speaker in here after. Excellent Answers fOR AHLE HADEES QUESTIONS
TheIslamicchanel 3 months ago 8