3-Way Debate (Full Debate) Part 14

[sediment5]

Kent Hovind gets 5 stars, as usual.

He wins, they lose.

God is real, & the Bible is true.

[Nowekian]

... were you listening at all?!

[sediment5]

Yes I was, were you ?

[Nowekian]

i certainly must have heard more than you, at the least, understood more. I don't know how you got from this debate to 'god is real, the bible is true'.... i assume you already believed that. regardless, kent hovind said a whole lot of nothing in all this!

[resistanceunion]

Its not a honest debate .. But despite that Sherman did a very good job ..

[sediment5]

You said " Its not a honest debate " .

What does that even mean resistanceunion .

Kent Hovind wins, and HE was/is honest.

Good on you Kent.

[resistanceunion]

Kent Hovind the only thing he can win now is a FIST in the EYE in JAIL he is in :D . The only thing bigger wean he gets out will be his anus.

[sediment5]

What a nasty piece of work you are resistanceunion.

Shame on you.

[paxson001]

Hovend is a brilliant merchant of ignorance.

[tommyk77]

f the only alternative is creation, then That makes evolution very true indeed, seeing as all Hovind's points are false. I don't think he said one thing where my brain didn't cringe at how bad his logic was

[Saxking2005]

Yeah, that makes sense. If the only alternative is something you don't want, it must be true.

[eltiogamboin]

He's talking about hovinds points being false and without logic.

[ChromeDove]

Hovend was brilliant! He had an answer for every question. Not guess work. Wallabies? Chehuawas cant mate with great danes but there still dogs. Thats not evolution. Shermer had no convincing evidence what so ever, Simply because evolution never happened.

[dinkypoopstick]

Chihuahuas CAN mate with great danes. Just because he had an answer doesn't mean any of his answers were correct. Almost EVERY thing he said is wrong.

[jamesjeffreypaul]

This entire debate is wonderful. Can the person who posted it re-post it in one long segment?

[Saxking2005]

I'd love to. If anyone knows how to post long videos on youtube, please let me know.

[dinkypoopstick]

This was a joke of a debate; even the moderator was biased against Shermer. Hovand is nothing more than a fast talking used car salesman. He spewed lies as if they were truths, and anything that he wasnt blatantly lying about was flat out incorrect.

[Gwisss]

Kent Hovind has produced too many falacious statements in this debate that it is hard to even taken him seriously any more.

He makes the claim that there is no evidence for biological evolution and abiogenesis because he knows that it is impossible for a evolutionary biologist to explain in 15minutes these two subjects.

[Saxking2005]

I've listened for hours and haven't found anyone give a good theory.

[dvrjosh]

Then you've been brainwashed.

[Saxking2005]

That's what you say instead of GIVING an actual theory?

[dvrjosh]

Well if I take your first point in a very strict literal way, then sure, no one gave a good theory. But if you think the theory of evolution which Shermer made rebuttals with is not "good," then I don't know what the hell a good theory looks like.

Evolution fits the description of a good theory in that there are mountains of evidence in it's favor, it has predictive value and it is useful in things that benifit us. By that definition it's better than quantum theory which is less understood

[dvrjosh]

and has so far been more applicable in technology like cell phones as opposed to medicine.

[sediment5]

Please explain how evolution could possibly be linked to Cell-phones dvrjosh.

Cell-phones obviously DID NOT evolve.

[Nowekian]

they most certainly did!!! It was a commercial/market driven evolution, but they are still 'evolving'!

[sediment5]

Name a '' rebutal '' that Shermer gave.

I obviously missed it.

Hovind gave a heap of 'rebutals' to evolution.

Whale's so called "hind legs" is one.

[eterna2]

Don't you see the logic of it? The hind legs are small BECAUSE they don't need to walk no more - they swim.

So yeah, they don't walk. But their ancestors USED to walk.

And Hovind gave a bunch of fake rebutals, that any proper student of the respective field could see the flaws obviously.

[BeRealistic101]

Go look at molecular genealogy. You don't even need the fossil record for enough evidence to be convinced of evolution. Look at the geographic distribution of species. Look at the distribution of fossils in the sediment. It's quite obvious unless one is exceptionally deluded, like Hovind.