LOL...You idiots hold so precious the data brought back from a 31lb. satellite launched in 1958 over modern data & assessments of the Van Allen belts?
Ralph Rene's book is an excellent, well-researched work. The best part is when he shows all the blatant inconsistencies between the accounts of the different "astro-nots" and NASA's statements. NASA is shown up to be the lying fool-asses they are. I love how much condescension there is for moon hoax "conspiracy theories" despite the vast, vast amount of credible scientific evidence that supports them.
I have been informed by David Percy, a photographer quoted in the Fox TV documentary, that he does indeed believe that man went to the Moon, but he believes there are anomalies in the imagery taken which “put into question many aspects of the missions”, which is a different matter."
PHIL PLAIT
IS THIS BULLSHIT EVEN TRUE? THIS WAS A QUOTE FROM AULIS ON PERSEY'S PAGE. DOES DAVID PERSEY REALLY BELIEVE THT MAN WENT TO THE MOON OR IS PHIL PLAIT LYING AGAIN? THANKS.
Why would the astronauts request improvements to their EVA gloves?
whitejarrah, it must be a conspiracy! LOL!
Because things CAN and SHOULD be improved whenever possible. Thanks to people who think like that, you can enjoy riding a car or flying an airplane instead of moving on horse or foot.
I rate this piece of garbage video from you 1 star. Couldn't give less. Make more of that stinking-bad science and rest assured, only serious ignorants or lunatics will watch all of that.
@BlisterHiker I haven't seen your dumb ass produce ANY FILMS that would in any way compare to White's WELL-RESEARCHED DATA schmuck.
All you fucktards think they need to say is-IT'S A CONSPIRACY and try to laugh it off.
But guess what asswipe? There ARE such things as conspiracies u moronic fuck.
They happen everyday in politics & business-it is shown in the CORRUPTION of all the liars in office today.Your shouting "CONSPIRACY THEORY" doesn't work anymore asshole.
@BlisterHiker It is easy to take the blue pill, believing what the government tells us. Most crave consonance and don't like cognitive dissonance. I can well understand your need to remove or to try to reduce the dissonance. Attacking the messenger is one way of doing it. In the meantime pop another blue pill. Don't take the red one. The rabbit hole is deep.
If NASA went to the moon in 1969, why haven't they made it to MArs yet! Come on 40 years later? I'm sure there are thousands of astronauts just raring to go - 6 year round trip is well worth it! WHY - because they cannot get over the Radiation problem - simple. WHY has no other country sent astronauts to the moon? Because they can't YET!!!!
Check out Japan's lunar orbiter satellite - no evidence of NASA ever being on the moon!
chumba, because there is a difference between going far from Earth for a few days, as during Apollo missions, and couple of years, as it will be required for missions to Mars.
Second, it will be very expensive, but obviously you do not understand much of that.
For now I suggest you learn something useful, maybe visit NASA website to find out more about challenges of long-term duration missions.
@BlisterHiker Second, it will be very expensive, but obviously you do not understand much of that.
WHY DO YOU FUCKING ASSHOLE MOONTARDS ALWAYS HAVE TO BE CONDESCENDING SCHMUCKS? BECAUSE U R BRAINWASHED SHEEP/PARROTS 4 NASA-DELUSIONAL ASSHOLES WHO DON'T HAVE THE COMMO SENSE TO SEE THAT MAN HAS NEVER GONE TO THE MOON. LOSER
The inherent problem I see here is the misconception that lead is the only material that can provide protection from radiation.
Lead can be very good in blocking high-energy electro-magnetic waves, but it's not a good idea for electrons and protons.
Geiger counters measure gamma rays and beta particle radiation. Lead reduced the count because it blocked out the gamma rays, but a lot of secondary radiation was created due to its high density (FCC crystal structure).
I must have missed that part. Still, those 3 are not the only things that can offer protection from radiation. In reality, anything can offer protection from some radiation, it all depends on the type.
Its comparison with water doesn't mean anything. The fact still remains that lead is not good for particle radiation. It is very DENSE, lots of particles packed together (FCC crystal structure). That makes it easier for particle radiation to collide with the lead atoms, causing 2ndary radiation.
Do you have a comparison analysis of the effectiveness against particle radiation between lead and aluminum?
No?
Then you can't claim that aluminum would have worsened the problem.
I am PROPOSING that aluminum would have been more effective because it is less dense which limits the probability of particle collision while still providing some protection against the gamma rays.
I'm betting that a lot more xrays were created from electrons hitting the lead shielding than the capsule.
@WhiteJarrah Wouldn't the exposure to cosmic rays be the same for the crews of the Shuttle ...ISS and the crew s of Apollo both being above the ozone layer?
In fact, Jarrah, there is a recently released video by one of the other truth seekers that clearly shows an Apollo 16 astroNOT with a hole through to his little finger where his pressurized glove should be!
It must have been extremely hot on those fake moonsets, for they needed desperately to vent the heat buildup in those phoney baloney space suits under those hot lights...
Apollo falling apart at a rapid pace now.. More information is constantly surfacing showing the sham in its glory!
Yes NTS, it is falling apart at an alarming rate. If only we could get the space radiation experts to take some risks and voice the truth!
I'm all for starting an Apollo Truth Movement...ATM...A place where we can withdraw some truth on the subject, while depositing apollogist lies into a data base for comparative analysis. I guess that what YouTube is for us!
(w)(w)(w).telegraph.co.uk/science/space/8746306/Nasa-releases-new-high-definition-images-of-Apollo-moon-landings.html
TheFireForEffect 5 months ago
LOL...You idiots hold so precious the data brought back from a 31lb. satellite launched in 1958 over modern data & assessments of the Van Allen belts?
LOLOLOL Gawd you're stupid...
Tweekerhead 7 months ago
Ralph Rene's book is an excellent, well-researched work. The best part is when he shows all the blatant inconsistencies between the accounts of the different "astro-nots" and NASA's statements. NASA is shown up to be the lying fool-asses they are. I love how much condescension there is for moon hoax "conspiracy theories" despite the vast, vast amount of credible scientific evidence that supports them.
bitterbonker 1 year ago
9:36
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
Every time I hear WhiteJarrah's dumb question "why would they request to improve their EVA gloves", it makes me laugh!
Again, maybe it's because astronauts and engineers just like to improve things, to make them better.
It's probably hard to understand for someone who never bother to get decent education... That's why he's asking that stupid question.
BlisterHiker 1 year ago
I have been informed by David Percy, a photographer quoted in the Fox TV documentary, that he does indeed believe that man went to the Moon, but he believes there are anomalies in the imagery taken which “put into question many aspects of the missions”, which is a different matter."
PHIL PLAIT
IS THIS BULLSHIT EVEN TRUE? THIS WAS A QUOTE FROM AULIS ON PERSEY'S PAGE. DOES DAVID PERSEY REALLY BELIEVE THT MAN WENT TO THE MOON OR IS PHIL PLAIT LYING AGAIN? THANKS.
cadu1995 1 year ago
Why would the astronauts request improvements to their EVA gloves?
whitejarrah, it must be a conspiracy! LOL!
Because things CAN and SHOULD be improved whenever possible. Thanks to people who think like that, you can enjoy riding a car or flying an airplane instead of moving on horse or foot.
I rate this piece of garbage video from you 1 star. Couldn't give less. Make more of that stinking-bad science and rest assured, only serious ignorants or lunatics will watch all of that.
BlisterHiker 2 years ago
@BlisterHiker I haven't seen your dumb ass produce ANY FILMS that would in any way compare to White's WELL-RESEARCHED DATA schmuck.
All you fucktards think they need to say is-IT'S A CONSPIRACY and try to laugh it off.
But guess what asswipe? There ARE such things as conspiracies u moronic fuck.
They happen everyday in politics & business-it is shown in the CORRUPTION of all the liars in office today.Your shouting "CONSPIRACY THEORY" doesn't work anymore asshole.
cadu1995 1 year ago
@cadu1995
Nobody really cares about your fanatical views anymore. I don't even read your comments when just at the first glance I see they are full of insults.
Present at least one, precise scientifically valid proof for Moon hoax theory. That would be something!
Otherwise, you won't impress anybody here showing you know how to type bad words.
Unless you show something specific, not your usual garbage, we have nothing to talk about, loser.
BlisterHiker 1 year ago
@BlisterHiker It is easy to take the blue pill, believing what the government tells us. Most crave consonance and don't like cognitive dissonance. I can well understand your need to remove or to try to reduce the dissonance. Attacking the messenger is one way of doing it. In the meantime pop another blue pill. Don't take the red one. The rabbit hole is deep.
mujaku 1 month ago in playlist More videos from WhiteJarrah
@cadu1995
Haven't seen any film debunking WhiteJarrah's garbage?
Have you actually watched anything that doesn't fit your fanatical faith in hoax?
Take a look at my videos. Take a look at videos from lukequixotesanjose, philwebb59, Astrobrant2, GoneToPlaid and others.
Each of these people has more knowledge of Space Exploration and science than WhiteJarrah could ever dream about!
In couple of my videos, I debunked WhiteJarrah's claims and put them to garbage, where they belong. Take a look.
BlisterHiker 1 year ago
@Blister Hiker none of the knowledge means anything if the missions were faked. the illusion of knowledge being just as dangerous as stupidity
datzfast 10 months ago
If NASA went to the moon in 1969, why haven't they made it to MArs yet! Come on 40 years later? I'm sure there are thousands of astronauts just raring to go - 6 year round trip is well worth it! WHY - because they cannot get over the Radiation problem - simple. WHY has no other country sent astronauts to the moon? Because they can't YET!!!!
Check out Japan's lunar orbiter satellite - no evidence of NASA ever being on the moon!
HAAAAAAAA - BUSTED!!!!!!!!
chumbawomba 2 years ago
Why didn't they go to Mars yet?
chumba, because there is a difference between going far from Earth for a few days, as during Apollo missions, and couple of years, as it will be required for missions to Mars.
Second, it will be very expensive, but obviously you do not understand much of that.
For now I suggest you learn something useful, maybe visit NASA website to find out more about challenges of long-term duration missions.
Learn your abc, "expert"...
BlisterHiker 2 years ago
@BlisterHiker Second, it will be very expensive, but obviously you do not understand much of that.
WHY DO YOU FUCKING ASSHOLE MOONTARDS ALWAYS HAVE TO BE CONDESCENDING SCHMUCKS? BECAUSE U R BRAINWASHED SHEEP/PARROTS 4 NASA-DELUSIONAL ASSHOLES WHO DON'T HAVE THE COMMO SENSE TO SEE THAT MAN HAS NEVER GONE TO THE MOON. LOSER
cadu1995 1 year ago
@chumbawomba Check out the LRO also-SHOWS NOTHING-lol
cadu1995 1 year ago
"If NASA went to the moon in 1969, why haven't they made it to MArs yet"
chumbawomba, try actually learning something about challenges of long-term missions in space.
Apollo missions lasted days. Mission to Mars will last about 3 years.
Realize the cost. Apollo program cost $25 billion in 60s/70s dollars. Do you have any idea how much a mission to Mars would cost?
There are still many things to learn before people embark on mission to Mars, including psychological side.
Learn the facts.
BlisterHiker 1 year ago
The inherent problem I see here is the misconception that lead is the only material that can provide protection from radiation.
Lead can be very good in blocking high-energy electro-magnetic waves, but it's not a good idea for electrons and protons.
Geiger counters measure gamma rays and beta particle radiation. Lead reduced the count because it blocked out the gamma rays, but a lot of secondary radiation was created due to its high density (FCC crystal structure).
rm06c 2 years ago
"The inherent problem I see here is the misconception that lead is the only material that can provide protection from radiation."
Where do I make that claim? Later in the videos I state that polyethylene and or water would do just the same.
"Lead can be very good in blocking high-energy electro-magnetic waves, but it's not a good idea for electrons and protons."
Actually, it offers the same protection as it's mass equivalent in water. Only lead is a lot less bulky than water.
WhiteJarrah 2 years ago
I must have missed that part. Still, those 3 are not the only things that can offer protection from radiation. In reality, anything can offer protection from some radiation, it all depends on the type.
Its comparison with water doesn't mean anything. The fact still remains that lead is not good for particle radiation. It is very DENSE, lots of particles packed together (FCC crystal structure). That makes it easier for particle radiation to collide with the lead atoms, causing 2ndary radiation.
rm06c 2 years ago
@WhiteJarrah
There are no sound on part 3.
johnsenkenn 1 year ago
"Lead reduced the count because it blocked out the gamma rays, but a lot of secondary radiation was created due to its high density"
Aluminum would have worsened the problem. When they used it on the ISS it increased the radiation from 0.027rem/day to 0.1rem/day.
And when shielding on Van Allen's early Rockoons created x-rays due to all the electrons hitting the capsule.
WhiteJarrah 2 years ago
Do you have a comparison analysis of the effectiveness against particle radiation between lead and aluminum?
No?
Then you can't claim that aluminum would have worsened the problem.
I am PROPOSING that aluminum would have been more effective because it is less dense which limits the probability of particle collision while still providing some protection against the gamma rays.
I'm betting that a lot more xrays were created from electrons hitting the lead shielding than the capsule.
rm06c 2 years ago
@WhiteJarrah Wouldn't the exposure to cosmic rays be the same for the crews of the Shuttle ...ISS and the crew s of Apollo both being above the ozone layer?
Tweekerhead 1 month ago
In fact, Jarrah, there is a recently released video by one of the other truth seekers that clearly shows an Apollo 16 astroNOT with a hole through to his little finger where his pressurized glove should be!
It must have been extremely hot on those fake moonsets, for they needed desperately to vent the heat buildup in those phoney baloney space suits under those hot lights...
Apollo falling apart at a rapid pace now.. More information is constantly surfacing showing the sham in its glory!
northerntruthseeker 3 years ago 2
Yes NTS, it is falling apart at an alarming rate. If only we could get the space radiation experts to take some risks and voice the truth!
I'm all for starting an Apollo Truth Movement...ATM...A place where we can withdraw some truth on the subject, while depositing apollogist lies into a data base for comparative analysis. I guess that what YouTube is for us!
un4g1v3n1 3 years ago
Northerntruth.
Do you have a link to this other truth seeker......
johnsenkenn 2 years ago
Northherntruth.
Do you have a link to this other truth seeker.....
johnsenkenn 2 years ago