Magnetic Motor (3 stator k-Mets)

[variablestatus]

to AdminOnDuty, precisely, jeweled movements, weightlessness and vacuum environment. your the first to mention my vision of larger, high precision, "working" storage/output models for society.

[variablestatus]

to PESNetwork, read my about this video and you'll find i mention slow down. since you've seen all the other k-Mets video's, take all the info contained and you'll, i'm sure, will be able to come up with an interesting question that i may answer for you.

[AdminOnDuty]

Well done. I knew those swiss watchmakers used jewel movements for a reason ;-).

I can forsee the upscaling of these systems to leverage off hours energy prices for resale back during on hours peaks. Of course if we saturate the demand with this technology the prices will equalize reducing profit and ultimately raising the price of off hours energy :( but it would help prevent brown outs and black outs :)

[variablestatus]

to dareka, to eliminate drag is the most important aspect in reaching unity itself, period.and..it's possible here on earth.

[variablestatus]

to crob,putting it in a vacuum will cancel out all of the drag from the air or wind vortexes created while it spins in our normal atmosphere.the magnetic/suspended environment cancels out most of the negatives of gravity.metal to glass/crystal contact is virtually frictionless in the right proportions.this would probably make k-Mets about 10,000 to 1 of any other system/experiment that's locked in a normal earth atmosphere that includes gravity, friction and air/wind vortex drag.

[PESNetwork]

Compare beginning speed to ending speed. It slows down. It is more apparent in the other videos posted by variablestatus. I posted a page about this at PESWiki dot com. search "variablestatus".

[variablestatus]

dareka,both,imagine one stator only in a k-Mets optimal environment including vacuum. take 1-2 seconds of a magnet motor underneath the glass spinning k-Mets to 10,000 rpm. 2 seconds of applied power and the stator spins for 3 days.imagine now an additional rotor built on top connected on the shaft of the spinning stator,it has magnets on the outside with corless copper inductance coils around it to absorb the energy bleeding of it for 3 days...2 seconds in vs. 3 days output....

[dareka11]

So in this statement, you're actually saying that the power for the two seconds it takes to spin up the stator is less than three days power output it will take to slow down? Won't the induction take power out of the spin? Are you claiming overunity? More out than in? If so, why's ocmpmm a hoax, but this (working on the same principle) isn't? I agree, it's a good energy storage device. Is that what you're saying too?

[variablestatus]

to dareka, i'll skip your first question and answer it with the others...the ocmpmm is probably a hoax because with my advanced models and with the laws of physics, you can't get inertia speed up.check out all the people who built the same model,no luck...i even built a perendev, it's a great brake! your question of overunity or good storage device, i'll answer on an additional response...

[crob227]

so putting it in a vacumn would cancell out gravity?

[dareka11]

Are you a bit stupid? You're claiming that the oc mpmm is probably a hoax because it claims 'overunity' and physics provides that can't be done, and then at the end of your blurb, you claim 'overunity'. Which is it? Overunity or a good energy storage device?