@cliffspc Well, we know NASA isn't and that is evident to the fullest thereof... But what did that have to do with my comment? I was actually ridiculing one of the NASA moon landing nuts Rob260259 <----(Why don't you ask him how did he come up with that stupid name?) that hits and run behind his shielding/blocking apparatuses after commenting on my page. You know how sore losers roll. NASA will fall, let the truth be told, for it cannot be contain forever...
@GUARDIANtrooper Looking at his name, it appears to be a date. Pisces?
Your name is obiously a reference to the Lucas classics. 'Guardian' seemed to me to be a biblical or literary reference. Cliff is a steep rock face, and thanks for dropping by!
And I agree that the truth should always be what is told. A secret is one thing, but lying is always wrong.
@cliffspc Actually, Guardian Trooper was an attack channel that was to protect my main channel from incursions from people that didn't like my videos. I was 13 at the time and I play double bass and cello in private school. Now attending a government school they have internet restrictions. Also being a rich kid, my mom closed out all my websites from the IP address, for security reasons, I got a big mouth. I lost everything. I took trooper from Storm Trooper, biracial turned him black, lol!
@MasterMark123 There is also a third film, the DAC footage of the ascent from tranquility base. This might be worked in with the other two films presented here. I'll see if I can do it sometime.
it would have been great had the maker of the video told us what to look for .... It DID seem that the two videos side by side the movements were not happening at the same times...
@MasterMark123 Thanks for the comments. Having two concurrent films is a good way to validate the evidence. Could this have been "faked" with the technology available in 1969? You cannot alpha-key film, so that leaves models as an option. Rather difficult given the scale/perspective change of the ascent module. Also, the hand-held camera looking up at the command module is obviously manned, so the only real question is whether or not the two films ARE concurrent. What do you think?
The hoax theory is only supported by self-absorbed fools, highschool drop-outs and delusional paranoids. They all think that they are smarter than scientists, engineers, geochemists, physicists, geologists, astronomers and astronauts from across the globe. It's 41 years now Potrodsas.
Tell us, are you one of those older conspiracists on the internet who mistrust all authority and supporting conspiracies like JFK, Freemasons, Illuminati, Apollo, NWO, 9/11 and more?
@Rob260259 Allright. All listen to a guy who got to sea at 18. Called Stupid Rob, Or was it 17? Well, doesn't matter, your brain's didn't grow by the police.
There are many pseudo scientists NASA hires from time to time to refute some of the hoax claims.And if you want we do have real scientists some times that may have actually refuted some of the hoax claims.But what we DO NOT have is a any credible scientist to VERIFY the NASA claims of a landing.
Nobody is stupid enough to put his name in such an obvious hoax.Only some amateurs like P.Moore and pseudo scientists like phil plait and the mythbusters.
@LunarTuner Why don't you ask the question. Name the scientist who will publicly out NASA and Apollo, and then have a cat's chance in hell of ever working again. That would be the more appropriate question LOONY. Always defending poor plait. Come to your senses already tuner...If you find this video to be a realisitc space exploit, you need to be medicated! I think you'll find this one to be much more athentic...Secret Apollo 11 footage finally released watch?v=yYbAiW9g7kw
@un4g1v3n1, I have to agree with you. If a scientist worked for me and believed that man never went to the moon, he have to fire him for simply being stupid. On the other hand, many scientists work for aircraft manufacturers, automobile manufacturers, pharmaceutical companies, energy companies, hospitals, etc. They certainly wouldn't be fired for blowing the whistle on Apollo, since they don't work for NASA. Yet, they still believe Apollo. Are you saying that hoax believers are silent cowards?
@LunarTuner If silence denotes cowardice YES! If they are stupid, like you, then they believe in Radiation-proof test pilots back in the late 60's early 70's....
Everything boils down to the facts that solar/astro physicists keep quiet about. Do you even watch science programs or are you related to an astronaut from back then, and really hate for him to be outed as the milli vanilli space explorer he was?
@LunarTuner I mean, anyone who watches this video, and tries to claim it as an authentic space exploit, not only is stupid, but blind, and living in serious DENIAL! How's the temperature in DA NILE BTW? I know that you'll try and say this joke of footage is authentic....Which should make anyone else who watches it realize, as I did well over a year ago, that you are one of two things. An idiot. Or a shill. Which is it?
@un4g1v3n1, what's your specific objection to this video? Is there some kind of inconsistency? Why don't you try speaking in specifics instead of pointless vagaries, dude? What's your objection here?
@LunarTuner It's comical. You can tell how fake it is by watching it. But you, no, you are a goddamned moron who can't see fakery when it is staring him in the face. Go back to your deluded state, and leave the debunkery to the ones who know better then hang around the plainly obvious fakery, who are smart enough to stay far away from this piece of footage. Damn, you really need to go back to BAUT and take some lessons from Jay and Phil! They know better than to try and argue this crap...
@un4g1v3n1, never mind. Apparently you cannot offer a specific objection to the video. I assume that means you either don't see anything wrong with it, your don't have the capacity of articulation or you just feel more comfortable engaging in insults and arguments by association.
We can have a congenial chat when you're ready to make a specific objection and do so with cordiality. Until then...have a nice day.
@un4g1v3n1 Yep he's a moron because he doesn't believe in: A faked moon landing, spirits, Chem trails, NWO, UFO's, Vaccines that cause Autism, Depopulation conspiracies, 9/11 conspiracies etc...
I've come to the conclusion that reality is just too boring for someone with an imagination like you and you need to pretend that all of this is true. Sure you don't really believe all this is true otherwise you would actually fight against the conspirators but instead you insult people online. Retard.
@cliffspc watch?v=KWgHmBtUUCo An excellent question. The answer: ASP The apollo simulation project.
The truth of the deception isn't pretty....But it is real. Apollo served many needs of the PTB. To make humanity feel as if it was united in a single goal, while at the same time, proving to themselves just how gullible, and easily controlled the masses minds were. It also allowed for a huge sum of resources, and tax dollars to be siphoned off for the PTB's purposes...
@omertia Yea, most people who realize their SANTA, or radiation-proof test pilots are actually lying assholes, who helped a bunch of ardent NAZI bastards play mind-fuck on humanity, end up projecting their anger at the source of their enlightenment. It's not the first time it's happened. What's important now, isn't to apologize for being a dunce, and ignorant of the facts. The most important thing you can do, is create an additional sockpuppet account, and start again!
@un4g1v3n1 Wow. You really need to get some help. There isn't THAT much radiation in space that people can't get to the Moon. Study some actual science, and put away the "Nazi" references. They don't help your cause.
@Mozart1220 "There isn't THAT much radiation in space that people can't get to the Moon" Really? Not that much eh? Well I guess you don't watch many space programs, unless their propaganda pieces with the NASA stamp of approval on it he? watch?v=Bqv4q35QqUg <in case you want to edumacate yourself. You see ignorance doesn't have to be a permanent state of being for yourself.... Don't want to believe the programs about space? Try a radiation expert. watch?v=6aWUa5l_WNs
@un4g1v3n1 "...characterize the kinds of radiation in space, from earth, that we really need to understand, that a crewmember on the way to Mars will encounter"
Eleanor Blakely
I watched the entire video, and she never said it was impossible to go to the moon. I am a skeptic, and still waiting for proof that no man has set foot on the moon. I agree that there are some flakey, manipulated and omitted data from NASA. I expect no less from a heavily-milatarized government agency.
@un4g1v3n1 But, on the balance of EVIDENCE, the argument still goes to the landings.
I would never say you cannot photograph stars. It would depend on the camera, lens, aperture and light-capture device/medium (ccd, cmos, film etc), and the skill and modes of the operator behind the camera. I have stars on my BG, albiet a night shot...
Keep the arguments coming, un4, that's why I posted these videos:)
@cliffspc I'll have to disagree with the EVIDENCE, as it is MISSING....Telemetry data which would have proved it...MISSING...LEM TECHNICAL SCHEMATICS, or how it worked....MISSING...ROVER PAPERWORK....MISSING...STARS....MISSING...LEM PLUME...MISSING....EXHAUST CRATER...MISSING...CANCER FROM ALL THAT RADIATION...MISSING....RADIATION DAMAGE TO FILM....MISSING...SUNBURN FROM RAISING HIS GOLD VISOR....MISSING...BELIEVABLE 1/6 G movements...MISSING....VIBRATION IN VOICES DURING LAUNCH...MISSING!!!!!!
@un4g1v3n1 Some things to look into, some I already knew. At least you provide some new information when asked, unlike many (on both sides of the debate) who simply repeat the same-old-same-old stuff. Just starting my holidays; will get back into it sometime later. Thanks for the comments, and leaving the adhoms out of our discussions. Appreciated!
@cliffspc Investigating the APOLLO lie mutates with every new revelation from the 'SPACE EXPERTS'. Be it admissions of the deadly radiation, to photographic evidence that contradicts the Apollo 'evidence'. I think what's most important is our willingness to learn, and eliminate information that we come to find as inaccurate. I think you would probably really enjoy this video. It blows away our 2d, limited understanding of our solar system. watch?v=wVskWr2NW2Q
@cliffspc Here is my latest about he missing exhaust plumes...I don't merely point out the fact the plumes are missing...I also show how HYPERGOLIC PROPELLANTS look in the vacuum of space when engaged by the SHUTTLE.....
Enjoy!
"Houston, we have a plumeblem." watch?v=KWRvYMx027w
@Mozart1220 Or perhaps you'd like to address the PRO-APOLLO NUTTER lie that stars cannot be photographed in Low Earth Orbit without overexposing the Earth, or Shuttle/spacestation? Or the lie that you can't see stars/LET ALONE PHOTOGRAPH them from the daylight side of the MOON? HMMM? Please enlighten us with your LOST CAUSE EXCUSES!!! Here it is...NOW WAKE UP! watch?v=tRwZixCwLHM
@potrodsas We went to the Moon, pothead. Do you know who made the reality of the Moon landings so apparent to me? An Australian dork named Jarrah White. He is an ironic joke. Ever heard of him?
There are no credible evidence(not even one) to support the NASA claims of men landed on the Moon.
All NASA has to show is fake,and if NASA was not an American organization protected by the criminal USA paramilitary system we would have seen a solution to this issue long ago.
Sooner or later the UN will be asked to take action BTW.
@potrodsas Dude! Every engineer,scientist, geologist, physicist ...and over 400 thousand people who worked on the program! to name a few all say we went to the moon! There is NOT ONE credible professional who disputes this! Not even The Russians! who tracked and who would've loved to have credible evidence but even all there top engineers and scientist believe we went! I think you've been watching too many "Jarrah White" video!
@bcrumpty And how do you know the Russians " tracked" and what exactly you think they "tracked"..And who exactly is "every" so we can ask him?Are you claiming that 400 thousand people went to the moon?Do you have ONE name of a credible scientist who puts his signature(not refuting any hoax claims)but to the authenticity of the landings?You don't !!Because no serious person will ever risk his integrity for what is such an obvious hoax.All you have is the myth busters and other pseudo scientists.
Lets see... Phil Platt, Carl Sagen, Neil deGrasse Tyson, Linus Carl Pauling, Harlold Clayton Urey and Dr Van Allen himself, TOO NAME A FEW!...what you got? Name just one you claims it was a hoax! and dont throw out Percy, Rene, oh how about jarrah White or Bart Sibrel (What a tool that clown is)
@bcrumpty Pretty much any scientist who has ever appeared on the History/Science channel regarding Astronomy and (astro)physics will probably tell you the Moon landings happened.
It's no use. Potrodsas is such a hoaxhead that thinks he's smarter than all those scientists, engineers, geochemists, physicists, geologists, astronomers and astronauts from across the globe. He must be some delusional self-absorbed fool or dropout who found everything he needs to conclude the Apollo program was a hoax from some YouTube videos.
These very same " compelling evidence"you are talking about ,in a society of justice,freedom and true (not in America that is)would put you straight to prison.
Do you know that a Dutch member of parliament proposed that if any of the Apollo 11 "astronauts" ever go to Holland should be arrested over the petrified wood issue?
I have been looking into this subject - I have found two compelling proofs, one being the rocks they brought back are are unique to the moon & the dust displaced by the rover goes up & straight down with out any clouds like on earth. Take a look at badastronomy com (the old site)...if you can find the rebuttals to the fox news cast bs - it explains it all.
I watched it again... and felt the same lie! This is really bullshit footage. I can imagine someone faking all this shit in the 60's...!!
GUARDIANtrooper 3 months ago in playlist Moon_UFO_03_15_11
@GUARDIANtrooper You wouldn't be a creationist, now would you? Just a hunch...
cliffspc 3 months ago
@cliffspc Well, we know NASA isn't and that is evident to the fullest thereof... But what did that have to do with my comment? I was actually ridiculing one of the NASA moon landing nuts Rob260259 <----(Why don't you ask him how did he come up with that stupid name?) that hits and run behind his shielding/blocking apparatuses after commenting on my page. You know how sore losers roll. NASA will fall, let the truth be told, for it cannot be contain forever...
GUARDIANtrooper 3 months ago
@GUARDIANtrooper Looking at his name, it appears to be a date. Pisces?
Your name is obiously a reference to the Lucas classics. 'Guardian' seemed to me to be a biblical or literary reference. Cliff is a steep rock face, and thanks for dropping by!
And I agree that the truth should always be what is told. A secret is one thing, but lying is always wrong.
cliffspc 3 months ago
@cliffspc Actually, Guardian Trooper was an attack channel that was to protect my main channel from incursions from people that didn't like my videos. I was 13 at the time and I play double bass and cello in private school. Now attending a government school they have internet restrictions. Also being a rich kid, my mom closed out all my websites from the IP address, for security reasons, I got a big mouth. I lost everything. I took trooper from Storm Trooper, biracial turned him black, lol!
GUARDIANtrooper 3 months ago
new LRO shots from 13mi orbit now. I'd encourage you to go look at the photo's. Conspiracy Theorists are on the verge of extinction - thankfully.
But thanks for this ascent upload - I enjoyed all six of the landings, but Apollo 11 holds a special place in my heart.
myrtlebox 6 months ago
@myrtlebox Agreed, A11 is my favorite.
btw, did you know that Voyagers are still going, and are at the threshold to Interstellar Space?
voyager*jpl*nasa*gov/
Also, the ESA has launched 2 of the most sophisticated telescopes into orbit outside the moon:
esa*int/esaCP/SEMEOSZXDUF_index_0*html
I would love to see another manned moonshot, but agree with the late Carl Sagan, that we get so much more for the money with unmanned spacecraft.
Thanks for the comments!
cliffspc 5 months ago
I watched it again.... and felt the same joy! This is really awesome footage. Can you imagine someone faking this all in the 60's..??
Rob260259 6 months ago
Or could the two films be from two different missions ?
MasterMark123 1 year ago
@MasterMark123 There is also a third film, the DAC footage of the ascent from tranquility base. This might be worked in with the other two films presented here. I'll see if I can do it sometime.
LunaCognita did a great job with the DAC footage:
/watch?v=FOV8xLGnUks
cliffspc 1 year ago
it would have been great had the maker of the video told us what to look for .... It DID seem that the two videos side by side the movements were not happening at the same times...
MasterMark123 1 year ago
@MasterMark123 Thanks for the comments. Having two concurrent films is a good way to validate the evidence. Could this have been "faked" with the technology available in 1969? You cannot alpha-key film, so that leaves models as an option. Rather difficult given the scale/perspective change of the ascent module. Also, the hand-held camera looking up at the command module is obviously manned, so the only real question is whether or not the two films ARE concurrent. What do you think?
cliffspc 1 year ago
I like how the moon stops appearing to rotate near the end - is that what I m supposed to see?
TREACLE97 1 year ago
This music sounds like Eno, but it's not.
southport97 1 year ago
Exactly! The moon is always in a prominent position amongst other fairy tales.
I'm happy you finally understood !
potrodsas 1 year ago
Face it.
The "moonlandings" will never be accepted as a reality.
The evidence for the Apollo "mission"are not able to stand scientific scrutiny not even for 5 minutes.
Despite the years of intense propaganda ,in the conscious of the average human the "moonlandings" are already where they deserved to be.
Next to the loch ness ,and bigfoot fairy tales!!
potrodsas 1 year ago
@potrodsas
Face it.
The hoax theory is only supported by self-absorbed fools, highschool drop-outs and delusional paranoids. They all think that they are smarter than scientists, engineers, geochemists, physicists, geologists, astronomers and astronauts from across the globe. It's 41 years now Potrodsas.
Tell us, are you one of those older conspiracists on the internet who mistrust all authority and supporting conspiracies like JFK, Freemasons, Illuminati, Apollo, NWO, 9/11 and more?
Rob260259 1 year ago
@Rob260259 Allright. All listen to a guy who got to sea at 18. Called Stupid Rob, Or was it 17? Well, doesn't matter, your brain's didn't grow by the police.
gijsshu 1 year ago
@gijssie
"..didn't grow by the police.."
What kind of English is that...?
LOL
The police doesn't make brains grow. All they do is brainwashing.
Rob260259 1 year ago
There are many pseudo scientists NASA hires from time to time to refute some of the hoax claims.And if you want we do have real scientists some times that may have actually refuted some of the hoax claims.But what we DO NOT have is a any credible scientist to VERIFY the NASA claims of a landing.
Nobody is stupid enough to put his name in such an obvious hoax.Only some amateurs like P.Moore and pseudo scientists like phil plait and the mythbusters.
potrodsas 1 year ago
@potrodsas Phil Plait is a pseudo scientist? He's a PhD. astronomer! Name a scientist who DOESN'T believe Apollo!
LunarTuner 1 year ago
@LunarTuner Why don't you ask the question. Name the scientist who will publicly out NASA and Apollo, and then have a cat's chance in hell of ever working again. That would be the more appropriate question LOONY. Always defending poor plait. Come to your senses already tuner...If you find this video to be a realisitc space exploit, you need to be medicated! I think you'll find this one to be much more athentic...Secret Apollo 11 footage finally released watch?v=yYbAiW9g7kw
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
@un4g1v3n1, I have to agree with you. If a scientist worked for me and believed that man never went to the moon, he have to fire him for simply being stupid. On the other hand, many scientists work for aircraft manufacturers, automobile manufacturers, pharmaceutical companies, energy companies, hospitals, etc. They certainly wouldn't be fired for blowing the whistle on Apollo, since they don't work for NASA. Yet, they still believe Apollo. Are you saying that hoax believers are silent cowards?
LunarTuner 1 year ago
@LunarTuner If silence denotes cowardice YES! If they are stupid, like you, then they believe in Radiation-proof test pilots back in the late 60's early 70's....
Everything boils down to the facts that solar/astro physicists keep quiet about. Do you even watch science programs or are you related to an astronaut from back then, and really hate for him to be outed as the milli vanilli space explorer he was?
Serious question!!!
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
@LunarTuner I mean, anyone who watches this video, and tries to claim it as an authentic space exploit, not only is stupid, but blind, and living in serious DENIAL! How's the temperature in DA NILE BTW? I know that you'll try and say this joke of footage is authentic....Which should make anyone else who watches it realize, as I did well over a year ago, that you are one of two things. An idiot. Or a shill. Which is it?
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
@un4g1v3n1, what's your specific objection to this video? Is there some kind of inconsistency? Why don't you try speaking in specifics instead of pointless vagaries, dude? What's your objection here?
LunarTuner 1 year ago
@LunarTuner It's comical. You can tell how fake it is by watching it. But you, no, you are a goddamned moron who can't see fakery when it is staring him in the face. Go back to your deluded state, and leave the debunkery to the ones who know better then hang around the plainly obvious fakery, who are smart enough to stay far away from this piece of footage. Damn, you really need to go back to BAUT and take some lessons from Jay and Phil! They know better than to try and argue this crap...
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
@un4g1v3n1, never mind. Apparently you cannot offer a specific objection to the video. I assume that means you either don't see anything wrong with it, your don't have the capacity of articulation or you just feel more comfortable engaging in insults and arguments by association.
We can have a congenial chat when you're ready to make a specific objection and do so with cordiality. Until then...have a nice day.
LunarTuner 1 year ago
@un4g1v3n1 Yep he's a moron because he doesn't believe in: A faked moon landing, spirits, Chem trails, NWO, UFO's, Vaccines that cause Autism, Depopulation conspiracies, 9/11 conspiracies etc...
I've come to the conclusion that reality is just too boring for someone with an imagination like you and you need to pretend that all of this is true. Sure you don't really believe all this is true otherwise you would actually fight against the conspirators but instead you insult people online. Retard.
TheHeather1985 1 year ago
@un4g1v3n1 I would be curious how you determined that these films were faked, and just HOW they were faked in 1969.
cliffspc 1 year ago
@cliffspc watch?v=KWgHmBtUUCo An excellent question. The answer: ASP The apollo simulation project.
The truth of the deception isn't pretty....But it is real. Apollo served many needs of the PTB. To make humanity feel as if it was united in a single goal, while at the same time, proving to themselves just how gullible, and easily controlled the masses minds were. It also allowed for a huge sum of resources, and tax dollars to be siphoned off for the PTB's purposes...
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
@un4g1v3n1
You are indeed a jack ass un4g1v3n1
omertia 1 year ago
@omertia Yea, most people who realize their SANTA, or radiation-proof test pilots are actually lying assholes, who helped a bunch of ardent NAZI bastards play mind-fuck on humanity, end up projecting their anger at the source of their enlightenment. It's not the first time it's happened. What's important now, isn't to apologize for being a dunce, and ignorant of the facts. The most important thing you can do, is create an additional sockpuppet account, and start again!
FAIL!
un4g1v3n1 1 year ago
@un4g1v3n1 Wow. You really need to get some help. There isn't THAT much radiation in space that people can't get to the Moon. Study some actual science, and put away the "Nazi" references. They don't help your cause.
Mozart1220 7 months ago
@Mozart1220 "There isn't THAT much radiation in space that people can't get to the Moon" Really? Not that much eh? Well I guess you don't watch many space programs, unless their propaganda pieces with the NASA stamp of approval on it he? watch?v=Bqv4q35QqUg <in case you want to edumacate yourself. You see ignorance doesn't have to be a permanent state of being for yourself.... Don't want to believe the programs about space? Try a radiation expert. watch?v=6aWUa5l_WNs
un4g1v3n1 7 months ago
@un4g1v3n1 "...characterize the kinds of radiation in space, from earth, that we really need to understand, that a crewmember on the way to Mars will encounter"
Eleanor Blakely
I watched the entire video, and she never said it was impossible to go to the moon. I am a skeptic, and still waiting for proof that no man has set foot on the moon. I agree that there are some flakey, manipulated and omitted data from NASA. I expect no less from a heavily-milatarized government agency.
cliffspc 7 months ago
@un4g1v3n1 But, on the balance of EVIDENCE, the argument still goes to the landings.
I would never say you cannot photograph stars. It would depend on the camera, lens, aperture and light-capture device/medium (ccd, cmos, film etc), and the skill and modes of the operator behind the camera. I have stars on my BG, albiet a night shot...
Keep the arguments coming, un4, that's why I posted these videos:)
cliffspc 7 months ago
@cliffspc I'll have to disagree with the EVIDENCE, as it is MISSING....Telemetry data which would have proved it...MISSING...LEM TECHNICAL SCHEMATICS, or how it worked....MISSING...ROVER PAPERWORK....MISSING...STARS....MISSING...LEM PLUME...MISSING....EXHAUST CRATER...MISSING...CANCER FROM ALL THAT RADIATION...MISSING....RADIATION DAMAGE TO FILM....MISSING...SUNBURN FROM RAISING HIS GOLD VISOR....MISSING...BELIEVABLE 1/6 G movements...MISSING....VIBRATION IN VOICES DURING LAUNCH...MISSING!!!!!!
un4g1v3n1 7 months ago
@un4g1v3n1 Some things to look into, some I already knew. At least you provide some new information when asked, unlike many (on both sides of the debate) who simply repeat the same-old-same-old stuff. Just starting my holidays; will get back into it sometime later. Thanks for the comments, and leaving the adhoms out of our discussions. Appreciated!
~peace~
cliffspc 7 months ago
@cliffspc Investigating the APOLLO lie mutates with every new revelation from the 'SPACE EXPERTS'. Be it admissions of the deadly radiation, to photographic evidence that contradicts the Apollo 'evidence'. I think what's most important is our willingness to learn, and eliminate information that we come to find as inaccurate. I think you would probably really enjoy this video. It blows away our 2d, limited understanding of our solar system. watch?v=wVskWr2NW2Q
Ditto..Respect!
un4g1v3n1 7 months ago
@cliffspc Here is my latest about he missing exhaust plumes...I don't merely point out the fact the plumes are missing...I also show how HYPERGOLIC PROPELLANTS look in the vacuum of space when engaged by the SHUTTLE.....
Enjoy!
"Houston, we have a plumeblem." watch?v=KWRvYMx027w
un4g1v3n1 7 months ago
@Mozart1220 Or perhaps you'd like to address the PRO-APOLLO NUTTER lie that stars cannot be photographed in Low Earth Orbit without overexposing the Earth, or Shuttle/spacestation? Or the lie that you can't see stars/LET ALONE PHOTOGRAPH them from the daylight side of the MOON? HMMM? Please enlighten us with your LOST CAUSE EXCUSES!!! Here it is...NOW WAKE UP! watch?v=tRwZixCwLHM
un4g1v3n1 7 months ago
This is not a real spacecraft flying from the moon.
This is a toy spacecraft on model moon background.
And any other "idea" is actually insulting generally to humans intelligence not only mine.
potrodsas 1 year ago
@potrodsas We went to the Moon, pothead. Do you know who made the reality of the Moon landings so apparent to me? An Australian dork named Jarrah White. He is an ironic joke. Ever heard of him?
TremorHellborn 1 year ago
@TremorHellborn
Yes I believe you went to the moon prognathous tit.
It is NASA that never went.
That's all..
potrodsas 1 year ago
@potrodsas HA! I bet 1000 years from now they're will be conspiracy theorists dumb enough to claim that humans did not originate on Earth.
You don't have any proof that astronauts did not walk on the Moon now do you?
TremorHellborn 1 year ago
@TremorHellborn
Ha!
My proof is that you have no proof.
Only fake evidence.
potrodsas 1 year ago
@potrodsas "My proof is that you have no proof."
A kindergarten student could come up with a better retort than that.
"Only fake evidence."
That is nothing more than hot air.
How do you explain the sharp and detailed bootprints in the lunar regolith seen in the Apollo videos?
What about how one of the astros on Apollo 14 could hop about easily with the high-gain antenna over his head, blocking the "wire"?
We went to the Moon. Evidence overwhelming.
TremorHellborn 1 year ago
@TremorHellborn
There are no credible evidence(not even one) to support the NASA claims of men landed on the Moon.
All NASA has to show is fake,and if NASA was not an American organization protected by the criminal USA paramilitary system we would have seen a solution to this issue long ago.
Sooner or later the UN will be asked to take action BTW.
potrodsas 1 year ago
@potrodsas I just gave you not one, but TWO pieces of irrefutable evidence that we went to the Moon.
Clearly, you are an ignorant, blind sheep who does nothing but obey the lies and serve the liegivers.
Have a nice life.
TremorHellborn 1 year ago
@potrodsas Dude! Every engineer,scientist, geologist, physicist ...and over 400 thousand people who worked on the program! to name a few all say we went to the moon! There is NOT ONE credible professional who disputes this! Not even The Russians! who tracked and who would've loved to have credible evidence but even all there top engineers and scientist believe we went! I think you've been watching too many "Jarrah White" video!
bcrumpty 1 year ago
@bcrumpty And how do you know the Russians " tracked" and what exactly you think they "tracked"..And who exactly is "every" so we can ask him?Are you claiming that 400 thousand people went to the moon?Do you have ONE name of a credible scientist who puts his signature(not refuting any hoax claims)but to the authenticity of the landings?You don't !!Because no serious person will ever risk his integrity for what is such an obvious hoax.All you have is the myth busters and other pseudo scientists.
potrodsas 1 year ago
@potrodsas
Are you the new Humanmonkeyrace? Or just another delusional hoaxhead? Boy...you're a laugh.
Rob260259 1 year ago
@Rob260259
I'm not a boy.
I'm old enough to possibly have sleep with your grandmother.
Tell my where are you from ,to check it out..
potrodsas 1 year ago
@potrodsas
"I'm not a boy."
Sorry girl.
Rob260259 1 year ago
@potrodsas Yea I figured you were a "Grandmas boy "lol
bcrumpty 1 year ago
@potrodsas
Lets see... Phil Platt, Carl Sagen, Neil deGrasse Tyson, Linus Carl Pauling, Harlold Clayton Urey and Dr Van Allen himself, TOO NAME A FEW!...what you got? Name just one you claims it was a hoax! and dont throw out Percy, Rene, oh how about jarrah White or Bart Sibrel (What a tool that clown is)
bcrumpty 1 year ago
@bcrumpty
You forgot to add donald duck to your list.
potrodsas 1 year ago
@potrodsas
You 'forgot' to mention the name of the Dutch member of parliament.
Rob260259 1 year ago
@potrodsas
Good comeback! I'm still waiting for a credible name from you! oh yea...You have none!
bcrumpty 1 year ago
@bcrumpty Pretty much any scientist who has ever appeared on the History/Science channel regarding Astronomy and (astro)physics will probably tell you the Moon landings happened.
Europasingstome 1 year ago
@Europasingstome
These are channels sponsored by NASA and CIA.
potrodsas 1 year ago
@potrodsas That's just being delusional and paranoid.
Europasingstome 1 year ago
@potrodsas
Still wating for the name of the Dutch member of parliament.
Oh yeah... You have none. Talking about fairytales...LOL
Rob260259 1 year ago
@bcrumpty
It's no use. Potrodsas is such a hoaxhead that thinks he's smarter than all those scientists, engineers, geochemists, physicists, geologists, astronomers and astronauts from across the globe. He must be some delusional self-absorbed fool or dropout who found everything he needs to conclude the Apollo program was a hoax from some YouTube videos.
Rob260259 1 year ago
@potrodsas Really?
Disprove the Moon rocks.
Europasingstome 1 year ago
@TremorHellborn Actually, there's a few people who believe that now.
Actually, there's a scientific theory that says a meteor might have brought the "lifestuff" that eventually became us.
crazy shit.
Europasingstome 1 year ago
@Europasingstome I know, I've looked into it. Haven't looked too deeply though : P
Ever seen the movie "Mission to Mars"?
TremorHellborn 1 year ago
@TremorHellborn Movie is awesome.
Europasingstome 1 year ago
@Europasingstome
I agree.
Rob260259 1 year ago
@potrodsas That's pretty much you saying "I'm not going to believe anything anyone tells me, regardless of how compelling the evidence is".
You're closed minded.
Europasingstome 1 year ago
@Europasingstome
These very same " compelling evidence"you are talking about ,in a society of justice,freedom and true (not in America that is)would put you straight to prison.
Do you know that a Dutch member of parliament proposed that if any of the Apollo 11 "astronauts" ever go to Holland should be arrested over the petrified wood issue?
potrodsas 1 year ago
@potrodsas You mean the same piece of petrified wood that was identified and confirmed when tests were run against actual Apollo samples?
I'd like to see an article, or something of that nature stating that if the Apollo Astronauts went to Holland, they'll be arrested.
Europasingstome 1 year ago
@Europasingstome Identified and confirmed to be a fake rock, that is.
As in, it didn't match the Apollo samples.
Europasingstome 1 year ago
@potrodsas
"Do you know that a Dutch member of parliament proposed that if any. . . blah blah"
Go a name Potrodsas? I'm going to The Hague next Monday, so I'll ask him or her about it.
Rob260259 1 year ago
@Rob260259
You will no be able to approach him.
He's got security guards to protect him from criminals of your kind.
potrodsas 1 year ago
@potrodsas
Dumbass. I'm one of the guards.
LOL
Rob260259 1 year ago
Again, thanks for your efforts in putting this vid together cliff.
valleytenderfoot 1 year ago
@valleytenderfoot thanks, I enjoyed doing this one!
cliffspc 1 year ago
I have been looking into this subject - I have found two compelling proofs, one being the rocks they brought back are are unique to the moon & the dust displaced by the rover goes up & straight down with out any clouds like on earth. Take a look at badastronomy com (the old site)...if you can find the rebuttals to the fox news cast bs - it explains it all.
omertia 1 year ago