@iOLY32 - You make baseless assumptions. You know nothing of the author's background, which is statistically likely to have been Christianity, given the country of origin.
First, learn to spell. Second, I call bullshit on your presentation of Christians in general. When you generalize instead of looking at indiviuals, you spread lies, and cause hate (a self justifying) feeling. And hate can justify anything with or without a God. Case in point YOUR VIDEO.
@vbirdieb - OK give an example of a misspelling by me - otherwise you're admitting that you felch wombats.
Also, you know perfectly well that your "generalize" comment is unfounded and irrelevant. None of the things I say about theists are untrue - thus, NOT lies. While you may be able to point to some xtians who are not motivated by ignorance and evil (I'm pretty sure my Mom fits that category) that in no way invalidates my assessment of the many evil theists who populate this world.
Christians not xtians, Jesus not jeebus, And your opening analogy of two Christians and a baby boy.....disgusting and a misrepresentation of Christians in general. Evil thiests? Try Evil men who are or may have been, religious leaders. And what religion did they belong to? You need to point to the person, not doing so is labeling everyone as the same, even your mother. You can even point to history and the indiviuals who abused their power, I have no problem with that, if it's accurate.
@vbirdieb - First, sorry, those aren't misspellings - they're commonly used and widely accepted alternative spellings - how's that wombat anus tasting?
Second, you miss the point of my 2 xtianx vs. baby boy parable... It is a mirror of a popular comment made by theists when they want to convince themselves that they are somehow better than atheists... The theist version asks "what's to stop the atheists from killing the baby, since they don't fear a god?"
(cont.) by turning it around so that you theists can see how it feels... and it sounds like you agree with me that this is a really shitty way to regard your fellow humans...
Of course I must point out that historically, my version is MUCH more likely to be accurate... Sorry for you to have to share your faith with so many real monsters (yes, like your Hitler and all of those pedophile priests) but that is really your problem.
Hitler may have cliamed to be Christian (actually Catholic), but his actions showed him for what he really was (evil, hater, murderer). The Bible even says you will know them by their fruit (actions and words). And based upon that, is how I can say you should attribute evil to the indiviual not the group. And if you learn (or know) the history of the Christian faith? You know that Rome persecuted and killed christians before TAKING IT OVER, so how is it even christian anymore.? Cont....
Now before it (the church) became totally corrupt, the Bible and it's contents were agreed upon. They later tried to keep people ignorant of what the Bible actually said, but God had other plans.
The Bible says judge not lest ye be judged. So, I'm sorry. I misunderstood your motivation. And the wombat thing, really.........was that necessary?
Sorry... the bible has never been "agreed upon" - nor has any other religious text. That's one of the problems with making shit up and claiming it's the word of some god.
...and the wombat thing... of course it wasn't necessary - so why'd ya do it?
Seriously, do you not get that I like to poke fun at the religious?
You don't know the difference between poking fun and just insulting thinking it's funny. I'll send you a playlist that's poking fun without saying disgustingly insulting things about the person.
What I point out in the video is that SOME atheists may commit atrocities, and nobody should defend such, but no link has ever been established to show that atheism was a cause of said behavior. By contrast, one would be hard pressed to find ANY religion whose followers have not committed atrocities SPECIFICALLY BECAUSE of their religious beliefs. In conclusion, my bias is sensible, rational, just, and well grounded. Yours?
There's nothing wrong with bias if it's based in fact and truth. Would we call a non-racist person biased? No, because racism has clearly destroyed countless lives and cultures and does absolutely no good for anyone. Incidentally, religion is the prime motivator for racism...and have you ever seen a racist atheist?
Thanks! Lately people have been appreciating my ideas quite frequently, even though I don't post any videos. All I want is to see more videos of this quality.
True. A little biased, but you openly admit it. And you do have proof to support your bias...like supporting one brand of ammo over another because the latter rarely works for you...
AWESOME!!!!! Do want more vids :D
javonne 1 year ago
You have an elementary understanding of Christianity.
iOLY32 1 year ago
@iOLY32 - You make baseless assumptions. You know nothing of the author's background, which is statistically likely to have been Christianity, given the country of origin.
a2zdiy 1 year ago
great vid, well done.
I would give you a 5/5 or more if it were possible.
philthy122 1 year ago
wicked real!
intimatethinker 1 year ago
This video is wicked awesome. ;-)
billygutter01 1 year ago
First, learn to spell. Second, I call bullshit on your presentation of Christians in general. When you generalize instead of looking at indiviuals, you spread lies, and cause hate (a self justifying) feeling. And hate can justify anything with or without a God. Case in point YOUR VIDEO.
vbirdieb 2 years ago
@vbirdieb - OK give an example of a misspelling by me - otherwise you're admitting that you felch wombats.
Also, you know perfectly well that your "generalize" comment is unfounded and irrelevant. None of the things I say about theists are untrue - thus, NOT lies. While you may be able to point to some xtians who are not motivated by ignorance and evil (I'm pretty sure my Mom fits that category) that in no way invalidates my assessment of the many evil theists who populate this world.
ElGordoTube 2 years ago
Christians not xtians, Jesus not jeebus, And your opening analogy of two Christians and a baby boy.....disgusting and a misrepresentation of Christians in general. Evil thiests? Try Evil men who are or may have been, religious leaders. And what religion did they belong to? You need to point to the person, not doing so is labeling everyone as the same, even your mother. You can even point to history and the indiviuals who abused their power, I have no problem with that, if it's accurate.
vbirdieb 2 years ago
@vbirdieb - First, sorry, those aren't misspellings - they're commonly used and widely accepted alternative spellings - how's that wombat anus tasting?
Second, you miss the point of my 2 xtianx vs. baby boy parable... It is a mirror of a popular comment made by theists when they want to convince themselves that they are somehow better than atheists... The theist version asks "what's to stop the atheists from killing the baby, since they don't fear a god?"
I reply to this ridiculous question...
ElGordoTube 2 years ago
(cont.) by turning it around so that you theists can see how it feels... and it sounds like you agree with me that this is a really shitty way to regard your fellow humans...
Of course I must point out that historically, my version is MUCH more likely to be accurate... Sorry for you to have to share your faith with so many real monsters (yes, like your Hitler and all of those pedophile priests) but that is really your problem.
Cheers!
ElGordoTube 2 years ago
Hitler may have cliamed to be Christian (actually Catholic), but his actions showed him for what he really was (evil, hater, murderer). The Bible even says you will know them by their fruit (actions and words). And based upon that, is how I can say you should attribute evil to the indiviual not the group. And if you learn (or know) the history of the Christian faith? You know that Rome persecuted and killed christians before TAKING IT OVER, so how is it even christian anymore.? Cont....
vbirdieb 2 years ago
Wow... fantastically tormented grammar *and* some completely unfounded (anti)-logic - an xtian two-fer!
ElGordoTube 2 years ago
@vbirdieb In early Rome Christians were persecuted for being
atheists. Anyone who would not make an offering to the emperor
who was Rome and a god was persecuted for atheism. People understood
that god and religion was the group identity before the idea of seperation of chuch and
state.
humansaretheworld 1 year ago
Now before it (the church) became totally corrupt, the Bible and it's contents were agreed upon. They later tried to keep people ignorant of what the Bible actually said, but God had other plans.
The Bible says judge not lest ye be judged. So, I'm sorry. I misunderstood your motivation. And the wombat thing, really.........was that necessary?
vbirdieb 2 years ago
Sorry... the bible has never been "agreed upon" - nor has any other religious text. That's one of the problems with making shit up and claiming it's the word of some god.
...and the wombat thing... of course it wasn't necessary - so why'd ya do it?
Seriously, do you not get that I like to poke fun at the religious?
ElGordoTube 2 years ago
You don't know the difference between poking fun and just insulting thinking it's funny. I'll send you a playlist that's poking fun without saying disgustingly insulting things about the person.
vbirdieb 2 years ago
I saw you didn't mention that Mao Tse-Tung or Stalin in your group of Athiests...but props for admiting the bias though.
charliebug101 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
charliebug101,
What I point out in the video is that SOME atheists may commit atrocities, and nobody should defend such, but no link has ever been established to show that atheism was a cause of said behavior. By contrast, one would be hard pressed to find ANY religion whose followers have not committed atrocities SPECIFICALLY BECAUSE of their religious beliefs. In conclusion, my bias is sensible, rational, just, and well grounded. Yours?
ElGordoTube 3 years ago
Stalin studied to be a priest before he became a dictator.
ratcatcherman 3 years ago
There's nothing wrong with bias if it's based in fact and truth. Would we call a non-racist person biased? No, because racism has clearly destroyed countless lives and cultures and does absolutely no good for anyone. Incidentally, religion is the prime motivator for racism...and have you ever seen a racist atheist?
KaminaGurren 3 years ago 2
Well put.
Eyrdal 3 years ago
Excellent comment!
Thanks 4 watching.
ElGordoTube 3 years ago
Thanks! Lately people have been appreciating my ideas quite frequently, even though I don't post any videos. All I want is to see more videos of this quality.
KaminaGurren 3 years ago
True. A little biased, but you openly admit it. And you do have proof to support your bias...like supporting one brand of ammo over another because the latter rarely works for you...
onijester56 3 years ago