I just wanted to say...on a personal note that if we all die and flutter out like a candle in the wind and there is nothing after death, hence we all will not only die for nothing but more over....we all will have lived for nothing and that's rather sad. Another thing, what's the harm in believing (in any God/s) only to die and there truly is nothing......what has one lost? Nothing.
It doesn't matter if the shroud is real or not. To people of faith and hope, it can be used to cement an individuals belief/s. As for the shrouds age being dated to 1200 years after the crusifiction... In the year 1532, the shroud suffered damage from a fire in a chapel. Changes where made in the years 1694 and further changes and repairs in 1868 and since the whole shroud wasn't tested against the pieces tested with radio carbon dating one could argue then about the shrouds true age.
Watching more of your video you should also check out oxycephallic, which is the more appropriate term for the derogatory pinhead. Made me laugh out loud though, favorited and subscribed.
If I could get my hands on the shroud of turin I would wipe my fundament with it's supernatural physiognomy and flush. Legit supernatural artifacts that baffle science; is that an oxymoron or what. Wooo woooo, wooo woooo is that a train or the bullshit whistle calling, lol.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Once again ATHEISM THINKS IN TWO DIMENSIONS!!! If you were any kind of researcher at all you would be able to determine no image will project itself EXACTLY IN THREE DIMENSIONS...and it never ceases to amaze me how close minded some scientific thought really is...how unlike Isaac Newton and others that take a premise and run with it willing to look at both sides. I am a christian but even I can see the science behind the research...your supposition is DATED RESEARCH..
When christians say "close minded" they mean - "why can't you accept this nonsense that I'm spewing?"
"EXACTLY IN THREE DIMENSIONS"
Do you mean a 3D object projected unto a 2D surface or a 3D object projected unto a 2D surface that is currently undulating through three dimensions like the surface of a wave.
Either way, please describe the geometry of the fun house mirror that Jesus was buried underneath that would allow the EXACT distortion shown above.
1. Look at 1:54 of the video. The beard isn't being measured. The "bottom of the head" box would be even lower if all of the beard was measured.
2. "Your a very..." should be "You're a very"
Poor little discouraged Athiest.[sic]
3. If YOU'RE going to say something twice for emphasis, make sure that over 25% of YOUR words are not misspelled or YOU'RE just going to emphasize how dumb you are. "Atheist" doesn't follow the 'i before e except after c' rule.
Oh okay..well maybe i was just confused...you see. If something was suppose to be a 2000 year old inprint of somebody's beaten, bloodied and cucrified head i think maybe the shape wouldnt be 100% accurate. Your argument sucks regardless. And btw i dont write comments on youtube as if i were i writing an essay so i really dont give a shit about my grammtical mistakes. But you have no life so you probably use spell check to write comments.
LOL. Are you claiming the shape was off because the romans beat the top of his head off ( wow, 'The Passion' didn't even get that rough) or that there is some magical cloth folding technique that allows for the image of the head to be mishapen the way that it was.
Your "grammtical mistakes" are the least of your mental errors.
Magical Cloth folding technique? haha no But it would seem as though after time the cloth could perhaps misshape itself after temperture changes due to climate or its change in surrondings, like idk maybe the fire that the Shroud was once in.
Just admit to yourself, That a Christian Artifact has Baffled Science.
LOL. That's some serious grasping of straws that you're doing there. It _would_ baffle science on how an image could get misshapen on a cloth without the corresponding linen threads that it rested upon getting misshapen too.
Yet you feel the need to keep coming back and making delusional statements (unsupported with evidence) with spelling, capitalization and "grammtical[sic] mistakes"
While I give you marks for creativity, do you realize that some of the top scientists of the world have studied this thing and have no clue how it was done?
We are talking about London Journal of Optics, Los Alamos Labs, University of Nebraska, Nature, etc etc.
But of course, none of that counts for shit next to some guy who digitally makes Jesus mouth on the Shroud utter: "like, wow, I was, like, totally confused and stuff".
Grown men with PhDs dated the shroud to the 1200s at the earliest.
But you theists suffer from what is known as disconfirmation bias, and will do anything and say anything to reject sound science in favor of silly superstitious nonsense.
Um...they were scientists approved by the Catholic Church to investigate the shroud after a VERY lengthy negotiation phase. And the part of the shroud they were allowed to carbon date was chosen by the church. There were no indications this was not an original part of the shroud until after the results were not what the church expected. And then the church SUDDENLY came up with this excuse.
Not buying it. It's a fake. Always has been. Get over it.
@condorito29 Penn and Teller replicated it almost exactly. Various ocres and resins on a painting canvas pressed over an effigy or relief of a human body and bingo, shroud of turin.
Also, you realize these same people you appeal too still date the thing to the 1400s, right?
I just wanted to say...on a personal note that if we all die and flutter out like a candle in the wind and there is nothing after death, hence we all will not only die for nothing but more over....we all will have lived for nothing and that's rather sad. Another thing, what's the harm in believing (in any God/s) only to die and there truly is nothing......what has one lost? Nothing.
anamericanokie 10 months ago
It doesn't matter if the shroud is real or not. To people of faith and hope, it can be used to cement an individuals belief/s. As for the shrouds age being dated to 1200 years after the crusifiction... In the year 1532, the shroud suffered damage from a fire in a chapel. Changes where made in the years 1694 and further changes and repairs in 1868 and since the whole shroud wasn't tested against the pieces tested with radio carbon dating one could argue then about the shrouds true age.
anamericanokie 10 months ago
Everything you said is nonsense
troybabi 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I AM JESUS , I AM THE 666 IN REVELATION...
THE MARKS / NUMBERS FORMING UPON MY FACE WILL SOON BE UNDENIABLE...
ulived1969 1 year ago
Elvis is alive! Wrestling is REAL! I am an UNDERWATER WELDER!
mgrelecki 2 years ago
I was mesmerized by the talking shroud, when it got to the pinhead bit, I sub'd.
Please do a talking grilled-cheese sammich jesus.
beerijuana 2 years ago
Jesus was an annuanki that is why he looks so weird.
deut429 2 years ago
Nice job on the animation! even blinking... awesome! Jesus = pinhead interesting idea!
jimrbsn 2 years ago
Brilliant, 1927solray. [clapping]
orpheusdraegun 2 years ago
thanks for the link..... really down to earth and compelling evidence!
jimrbsn 2 years ago
That does explain a few things. Like when jesus' family came in during his sermon and said he was out of his mind makes much more sense now.
Nihilist127 2 years ago
Watching more of your video you should also check out oxycephallic, which is the more appropriate term for the derogatory pinhead. Made me laugh out loud though, favorited and subscribed.
zoxovox 2 years ago
If I could get my hands on the shroud of turin I would wipe my fundament with it's supernatural physiognomy and flush. Legit supernatural artifacts that baffle science; is that an oxymoron or what. Wooo woooo, wooo woooo is that a train or the bullshit whistle calling, lol.
zoxovox 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Once again ATHEISM THINKS IN TWO DIMENSIONS!!! If you were any kind of researcher at all you would be able to determine no image will project itself EXACTLY IN THREE DIMENSIONS...and it never ceases to amaze me how close minded some scientific thought really is...how unlike Isaac Newton and others that take a premise and run with it willing to look at both sides. I am a christian but even I can see the science behind the research...your supposition is DATED RESEARCH..
vintageldy 2 years ago
When christians say "close minded" they mean - "why can't you accept this nonsense that I'm spewing?"
"EXACTLY IN THREE DIMENSIONS"
Do you mean a 3D object projected unto a 2D surface or a 3D object projected unto a 2D surface that is currently undulating through three dimensions like the surface of a wave.
Either way, please describe the geometry of the fun house mirror that Jesus was buried underneath that would allow the EXACT distortion shown above.
Run with that, kid.
1927Solvay 2 years ago
1. Look at 1:54 of the video. The beard isn't being measured. The "bottom of the head" box would be even lower if all of the beard was measured.
2. "Your a very..." should be "You're a very"
Poor little discouraged Athiest.[sic]
3. If YOU'RE going to say something twice for emphasis, make sure that over 25% of YOUR words are not misspelled or YOU'RE just going to emphasize how dumb you are. "Atheist" doesn't follow the 'i before e except after c' rule.
1927Solvay 2 years ago
Oh okay..well maybe i was just confused...you see. If something was suppose to be a 2000 year old inprint of somebody's beaten, bloodied and cucrified head i think maybe the shape wouldnt be 100% accurate. Your argument sucks regardless. And btw i dont write comments on youtube as if i were i writing an essay so i really dont give a shit about my grammtical mistakes. But you have no life so you probably use spell check to write comments.
LSUBOY41 2 years ago
LOL. Are you claiming the shape was off because the romans beat the top of his head off ( wow, 'The Passion' didn't even get that rough) or that there is some magical cloth folding technique that allows for the image of the head to be mishapen the way that it was.
Your "grammtical mistakes" are the least of your mental errors.
1927Solvay 2 years ago
Magical Cloth folding technique? haha no But it would seem as though after time the cloth could perhaps misshape itself after temperture changes due to climate or its change in surrondings, like idk maybe the fire that the Shroud was once in.
Just admit to yourself, That a Christian Artifact has Baffled Science.
LSUBOY41 2 years ago
"temperture[sic] changes "?
LOL. That's some serious grasping of straws that you're doing there. It _would_ baffle science on how an image could get misshapen on a cloth without the corresponding linen threads that it rested upon getting misshapen too.
1927Solvay 2 years ago
your boring me
LSUBOY41 2 years ago
"your[sic] boring me"
LOL
Yet you feel the need to keep coming back and making delusional statements (unsupported with evidence) with spelling, capitalization and "grammtical[sic] mistakes"
1927Solvay 2 years ago
Yeah because its very impossible to have a beard.
I think your just pissed off cause the Shroud of Turin is actually pretty Scientificly Legit.
Your a very closed-minded person.
Poor little discouraged Athiest.
Poor little discouraged Athiest.
LSUBOY41 2 years ago
P.S. I need to get my hands on that software.
NymphsOrisons 2 years ago
Scott and I laughed our asses off! HAHAH! Wrong, so WRONG, but funny. Very funny. There are some Christians in the world with a sense of humor.
Mary and Scott
NymphsOrisons 2 years ago
This Rocks!!! LOL
SierraAtheist 2 years ago
Fucking hilarious!!!!!! No other way to put it. I had to stop in the middle cause my sides hurt so bad.
ChristopherAthiest 2 years ago
What if Jesus was being sarcastic?
"Oh yeah, the MEEK shall inherit the earth...I'm sure THAT's what's going to happen. Yeah. Sure."
The bible doesn't give context.
middlekk 2 years ago
Hilarious. You gave the shroud of turin the proper ammount of respect that it deserved.
dowter 2 years ago 2
While I give you marks for creativity, do you realize that some of the top scientists of the world have studied this thing and have no clue how it was done?
We are talking about London Journal of Optics, Los Alamos Labs, University of Nebraska, Nature, etc etc.
But of course, none of that counts for shit next to some guy who digitally makes Jesus mouth on the Shroud utter: "like, wow, I was, like, totally confused and stuff".
Adolescent sarcasm Vs. Hard science?
condorito29 2 years ago
University of Nebraska, Los Alamos Labs, London Journal of Optics, vs. "Jesus had like, monkey arms and stuff".
Do you think you are still in HIGH SCHOOL?
Sarcasm may win you friends and prestige in High School, but you are up against GROWN MEN who have Phd's and long serious careers behind them.
Pathetic.
condorito29 2 years ago
Grown men with PhDs dated the shroud to the 1200s at the earliest.
But you theists suffer from what is known as disconfirmation bias, and will do anything and say anything to reject sound science in favor of silly superstitious nonsense.
middlekk 2 years ago 3
Los Alamos Labs has just said that the Carbon Dating of 1987 was INVALID, since they tested a rewoven part of the shroud.
moreover, grown men with Phd's proved that the shroud is not a painting.
do your homeork, instead of making adolescent comments in the back of class.
condorito29 2 years ago
Disconfirmation bias at its finest.
`
middlekk 2 years ago
says you??
oh yea, you know more than the guys at Los Alamos Labs.
hahahaha....what a pathetic joke.
thanks for the laughs.
condorito29 2 years ago
Precisely. Disconfirmation bias at its finest.
Otherwise known as "grasping at straws".
middlekk 2 years ago
@condorito29 The shroud, like your religion, is a fraud, based on false information and wishful thinking.
Sorry, but the tests still stand.
johnycannuk 4 months ago
@middlekk they were Freemasons..and the dated one part of the shroud(which was suspected to be a repair)
malechauvinistxy 2 months ago
@malechauvinistxy
Um...they were scientists approved by the Catholic Church to investigate the shroud after a VERY lengthy negotiation phase. And the part of the shroud they were allowed to carbon date was chosen by the church. There were no indications this was not an original part of the shroud until after the results were not what the church expected. And then the church SUDDENLY came up with this excuse.
Not buying it. It's a fake. Always has been. Get over it.
middlekk 2 months ago
Hey now, he said that the Shroud of turin was real. But it does however prove that jesus had mental retardation.
ChristopherAthiest 2 years ago
@condorito29 Penn and Teller replicated it almost exactly. Various ocres and resins on a painting canvas pressed over an effigy or relief of a human body and bingo, shroud of turin.
Also, you realize these same people you appeal too still date the thing to the 1400s, right?
johnycannuk 4 months ago
OK you HAVE to keep the 'Talkin' Turin' avatar thing. It's GOLD.
VeritasLiber 2 years ago