Teacher Arrested for Exercising Her Constitutional Rights.mov

[Fireinthedawn]

@mrbellization if they wanted to know if she had a criminal record or anything they should of run the tags on the vehicle. They had no right to pull her over in the first place. For what? You know why they pulled her over? as a part of a RANDOM search. The kind of search that is "unreasonable" The cops are NOT within their legal rights to randomly check if the drivers of vehicles are criminals or carrying a license.

[mrbellization]

Ok, driving a motor vehicle is NOT a constitutional right. You MUST carry a license, registration, and insurance when you are driving. The cops probably overacted, but she did not show her license to drive so it's reasonable to stop her driving.

Also, the video says "they pull over a housewife w/ no criminal records" as if it's proof the police are in the wrong. She refused to identify herself so they have no idea who she is.

Walking would be a different story.

[carloflo]

SHE SURELY HAVE MORE BALLS THAN ME

[KayBeeEee1983]

The 4th amendment protects a person against "UNREASONABLE searches and seizures". Only a total moron thinks that asking for license, registration, and proof of insurance is an unreasonable request.

(1) How is this cop supposed to know that the woman doesn't have a criminal record if she won't show him ID?

(2) The cop didn't pull her over and immediately tell her to get out of the car. He did that after she refused to show him proof that she was even allowed to drive a car in the first place.

[deftbtm]

@blackjerryboymetal fuck you fuckin propaganda idiot

[izlude2]

We need to disband the supreme court. They're the next worst thing in terms of TSA.

[moomman89]

It sure would be nice if the cops would read the constitution.Then think what they read.But no.If they did .They would have to quite there jobs.

[marypoppins2009]

Get PPL, Pre-paid Legal...and you can simply say "if it is your intent to detain or arrest me...I need to call my attorney". Find them online....and get them...about $17 per month...with a legal shield...much needed NOW.

[ranhefner]

WRONG! She was not exercising her constitutional rights.  In Delaware v. Prouse 440 U.S. 648 (1979), the Supreme Court allowed discretionless checkpoints for driver's licenses and registration. The officers were right.

[svenp]

Under arrest for resisting arrest! God I love that good 'ol standby.

"You haven't done anything wrong but you've pissed me off and I've got to have a reason to arrest you."

[SPACKlick]

any follow up on what happened to the troopers?

[armypenguin]

So what if shes anti-government if she isn't doing violent acts then there is nothing that they can do about it.

[thomas242007]

@armypenguin thats what i was thinking to it is kinda strange when i got busted for somthing the cops started going through some of my internet stuff and they started talking about how on this one blog i called myself an anarachist when i never said anything abotu that, kinda odd huh

[armypenguin]

I hope the troopers lose their jobs.

[ram0166]

The troopers are just ignorant. They are just trying to find something they can use to charge her. They don't realize that what they have been trained to do and to look for is wrong. They are just a symptom of the problem. We don't win over law enforcement officers by attacking them for doing what they believe is their duty. They need to be reached out to and educated in the truth.

[andrenj1970]

there should be a real reason before these cops should do such a thing, by the way the lady could be more cooperative too;) that would piss them less and maybe they would let her go. 99% of the time when I was checked by the cops they were arrogant buttholes for no reason at all and I was nice and quiet like a sheep haha. There are some real good cops out there but not enuff sadly.

[pantadon]

Yep, sad...