I want to construct a basic triangle lifter. I already have like 40000VDC.
The question about the construction is that the positive electrode (the thin wire on the top) should be without isolation? I made one, but the distance between the electrodes was too small and I got sparkling and the whole thing burnt in flames...
but with 20kVDC it didnt fly, just some ion-wind came out. Any advices?
I see everyone making lifters, but no-one has had the inginuity yet to put a toroid coil in between the two capacitors yet.. that will circulate the thrust like a smoke ring, increasing the lift exponentially.. meaning you could carry a much much heavier payload, making manned flight easy.
Exactly. Toroids, as Stan Deyo reccommends, are the next-level of force, should amplify the unidierectional force greatly! Also experimet with bifilar and cadeuceous-wound coils. Use ugh-current, low-Voltage PULSED DC on the toroidal coil. Use a hollow soft-iron(or Swedish Steel) core, with a square cross-section.
Page 16 (pdf 20) of NASA's CR-2004-213312 in 2004 concluded that "we find that their operation is fully explained by a very simple theory that uses only electrostatic forces and the transfer of momentum by multiple collisions."
I have read the NASA paper CR-2004-213312 (do a google search)
It concludes the Asymmetrical capacitor works by Ions and air... just like the other antigravity lifters. Even in the vacuum, Robert Talley wrote, "Direct experimental results show that under high vacuum conditions... no detectable propulsive force was electrostatically induced by applying a static potential difference... between test device electrodes..."
I have uploaded 2 videos of the Official Debunking of Antigravity lifters on the Discovery Channel. The youtube video code is Jk2GGoMJ7NU and a0FusVb4Gp4
I got banned by Beamshipcaptain for copying and pasting the Wikipedia entry for "Ionocraft". The Wiki entry explains how the ionocraft (his "Beamship") has absolutely NOTHING to do with 'antigravity', and is simply an ion wind generator.
Must you spam everyone's site? You also got banned from The Searl SEG sites because of your spam, disinformation, and unwillingness to educate yourself, just issuing spam and negativity. Nor will you try the experiments. You are just like the Inquisitor Tribunal members in PLANET OF THE APES.
Simply download the NASA vacuum-chamber tests from 2003 on jlnlabs dot org, and TT Brown's own 50-year old vacuum tests, other vacuum tests are on youtube. Read- POSSIBLILITY OF A STRONG COUPLING BETWEEN ELECTRICIY AND GRAVITATION, Takaaki Musha (Yokohama, Japan). Work now sponsored by HONDA (the folks behind the ASIMO humanoid-robot).
You see, wikipedia is made by people just like you. How is it any credible when it comes to a controversial topic? Wikipedia contents are controversial in topics like this. Somebody is going to agree and somebody won't. That's why it's pointless to quote wikipedia as a form of argument for or against controversial technologies. Besides, we are not stupid, don't you think most people here already tried google and wikipedia in search for this information?
I want to construct a basic triangle lifter. I already have like 40000VDC.
The question about the construction is that the positive electrode (the thin wire on the top) should be without isolation? I made one, but the distance between the electrodes was too small and I got sparkling and the whole thing burnt in flames...
but with 20kVDC it didnt fly, just some ion-wind came out. Any advices?
Berecz 8 months ago
@Berecz first, make sure there is no sharp edges anywhere on the foil or wire.
because 40 KV makes 4 cm sparks, it should either be fed a little less voltage, or put the wire(anode) higher.
but no too high. it needs to be just the right distance.
so thats it. the right distance, and smooth foil and strait wire
powermaks 5 months ago
@Berecz first, make sure there is no sharp edges anywhere on the foil or wire.
because 40 KV makes 4 cm sparks, it should either be fed a little less voltage, or put the wire(anode) higher.
but no too high. it needs to be just the right distance.
so thats it. the right distance, and smooth foil and strait wire
powermaks 5 months ago
@powermaks Now it is working, I made a frame from balsa wood and it works well :) check it out in my videos :)
Berecz 5 months ago
so... are all these aluminun and toothpick "lifters" on strings supposed to be like some kind of nerd "joke"? (i use the term loosely, at best.)
is this what passes for humor in the psuedo intellectual community these days?
seriously... this is all you got?
flashypaws 1 year ago
I see everyone making lifters, but no-one has had the inginuity yet to put a toroid coil in between the two capacitors yet.. that will circulate the thrust like a smoke ring, increasing the lift exponentially.. meaning you could carry a much much heavier payload, making manned flight easy.
p3x797 2 years ago
Exactly. Toroids, as Stan Deyo reccommends, are the next-level of force, should amplify the unidierectional force greatly! Also experimet with bifilar and cadeuceous-wound coils. Use ugh-current, low-Voltage PULSED DC on the toroidal coil. Use a hollow soft-iron(or Swedish Steel) core, with a square cross-section.
Beamshipcaptain 2 years ago
No body claims that it is Antigravity. It is just Electrogravity and the ionic propulsion causes the most powerfull trust.
vahid2t 3 years ago
Page 16 (pdf 20) of NASA's CR-2004-213312 in 2004 concluded that "we find that their operation is fully explained by a very simple theory that uses only electrostatic forces and the transfer of momentum by multiple collisions."
In short... ITS IONS, NOT ANTIGRAVITY!
Joeviocoe 3 years ago
I have read the NASA paper CR-2004-213312 (do a google search)
It concludes the Asymmetrical capacitor works by Ions and air... just like the other antigravity lifters. Even in the vacuum, Robert Talley wrote, "Direct experimental results show that under high vacuum conditions... no detectable propulsive force was electrostatically induced by applying a static potential difference... between test device electrodes..."
Joeviocoe 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I have uploaded 2 videos of the Official Debunking of Antigravity lifters on the Discovery Channel. The youtube video code is Jk2GGoMJ7NU and a0FusVb4Gp4
Titled "Lifter Anti-Gravity Myth has been BUSTED"
Joeviocoe 3 years ago
I got banned by Beamshipcaptain for copying and pasting the Wikipedia entry for "Ionocraft". The Wiki entry explains how the ionocraft (his "Beamship") has absolutely NOTHING to do with 'antigravity', and is simply an ion wind generator.
Drevtoobe 4 years ago
Must you spam everyone's site? You also got banned from The Searl SEG sites because of your spam, disinformation, and unwillingness to educate yourself, just issuing spam and negativity. Nor will you try the experiments. You are just like the Inquisitor Tribunal members in PLANET OF THE APES.
Beamshipcaptain 4 years ago
Simply download the NASA vacuum-chamber tests from 2003 on jlnlabs dot org, and TT Brown's own 50-year old vacuum tests, other vacuum tests are on youtube. Read- POSSIBLILITY OF A STRONG COUPLING BETWEEN ELECTRICIY AND GRAVITATION, Takaaki Musha (Yokohama, Japan). Work now sponsored by HONDA (the folks behind the ASIMO humanoid-robot).
Beamshipcaptain 4 years ago
You see, wikipedia is made by people just like you. How is it any credible when it comes to a controversial topic? Wikipedia contents are controversial in topics like this. Somebody is going to agree and somebody won't. That's why it's pointless to quote wikipedia as a form of argument for or against controversial technologies. Besides, we are not stupid, don't you think most people here already tried google and wikipedia in search for this information?
purplenoise2002 3 years ago
whats going on? i dont get it
positivitymaster 4 years ago
put a platform on it and experiment with how much weight you can lift.
Best yet so far Ive seen was a mouse...but that was with a far larger lifter, and 30kv iirc.
why does everyone just up and down it, snappy snap !!! nice work tho..
winofiend 5 years ago