Added: 3 years ago
From: DiscoveryNetworks
Views: 686,214
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,968)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Two conspiracy theories that are true-

    9/11 was an inside job.

    spurstalk (dot) com/forums/showthread (dot) php?t=144746

    NASA faked the moon missions in a studio.

    spurstalk (dot) com/forums/showthread (dot) php?t=144487

  • @Cosmored.... 9/11 was an inside job, NASA faked the moon missions in a studio....

    you know these things??? how???

  • what does pussy smell like?

    

  • @PesciNcasino imagine opening the doors to a fish market on a monday morning after a hot weekend

  • @demozdaze eww

  • why call it advert......ad is the short way

  • Well I get you got to make a lioving somehow. It's a shame though that you perpetuate ignorance and inaccuracy as though you are revealing some new information when analysis of your video reveals no new factual info

  • Wait... The thing about the calendar is true.... Its because the gregorian calendar wasnt set up correctly and so each year we lost a bunch of days, and one year they fixed the calendar and reset the date forward a few months to where it should be... Its not a conspiracy

  • @KryptoChronicutelite Im not bitching haha

  • if theres going to be adverts , dont make them have to buffer to ?

  • Am i the only one that wants to call that number

  • @drgnforce4ever call the number then and stop bitching.

  • Hear what God of Israel YAHUSHUA-YAHUWAH (Son and Father are ONE) saying to our generation by His chosen prophets: Trumpetcallofgodonline. com ; Letter called "Purify Your Faith, and Come to the Father as It is Written": EXCERPT: "Only in the Bible and through these very Letters, of which I have given to My prophet of the end of this age, shall you find Him and know Him."

    Watch:

    " youtube.com/watch?v=YZPmTH6slo­o"

    "youtube.com/watch?v=lutJYDxP6­ys"

    "youtube.com/watch?v=R9ike7PKd­8U"

    Regards.

  • Isn't the official theory the one that says the earth is getting smaller? What about Pangea Ultima? In my opinion, the resizing of the earth isn't as big of a theory as plate tectonics.

  • I'm an anonymous expert in theology. Its all fake.

  • anyone see the resemblence to metal gear solid 3 plot for the fiest one kinda (boss)

  • The expanding earth one made me super facepalm. I can't believe people are dumb enough to believe that one ==.

    at least give it some thought before you think it's true.

  • @Demonato it actually makes a decent bit of sense. more so than plate tectonics

  • Lower gravity has nothing to do with the survivability of dinosaurs! It was the increased levels of oxygen in the atmosphere that allowed them to live. We can see this in ice cores taken from glaciers.

  • The translation for the first clip is rubbish, there is no way they could translate that.

  • and mr i believe in a flat earth your a ding ding we can see the sun the moon and with a telescope all other planets and we can very clearly see they are round and the earth casts a round shadow on the moon thats why its causes a cresent shape

  • the earth couldnt have possibly been that small because the amount of water on earth wouldnt be increasing if all the continents were touching where was all the water on earth? the world have been entirely engulfed by water... just my theory

  • @135scotty well baisicaly when the dinosaurs realised they were about to die they all pissed themselves in fright.... there.

  • fuck off advert

  • @HENDIEFELLA adblock plus+google chrome, never watch an advert on youtube agian!

  • @Nordfallen Thanks.

  • lol, I'm going to dissapear too.

  • I have a really hard time not believing number 2, or at least giving it some attention. It makes a ridiculous amount of sense, and also goes along with the theory that all large bodies, including the universe itself, are in a constant state of either expansion or contraction. Also, think about all the matter and liquid that's been pulled to the earth from our orbit. That alone would cause the world to expand.

  • @BGBailen could not have said it better myself

  • Comment removed

  • The round Earth theory has many flaws, there is so much wrong with it. The only reason everyone worships that theory like a religion is because the flat Earth scientist can't get their papers published. If the Earth was round then what would stop it from rolling away? And that would mean that the Chinese people and Americans are standing upside down to each other. If you fly an airplane from the US to china does the plane have to turn upside down in the middle of the flight?

  • @Khyrid

    hehehe

    If the earth would be flat, the chinese people would NOT live underneath us but next to us, and in this case a ship or airplane would NOT have to turn up side down...

    The idea whas that we live next to each other...

  • @Weibkoln That's right, so in conclusion the Earth must be flat.

  • @Khyrid

    in the conclusion (if we could NOT see earth from above) it may have been possible that I would have thought that it is flat as well!!!

  • @Weibkoln The Earth is flat and anybody who denies it is just brainwashed by the media. Have you been in outer space yourself? Obviously the round Earth is just a government conspiracy to prevent people from learning how to become immortal at the edges of the Earth.

  • @Khyrid

    All the things which we (human) can create and see have limmits, and edges to...

    -.

    it there are edges it must be inside of us all

    this would meen that each and everyone of us, is his own edge of the world around him or her!!!

    -

    I also have had my moment that I thought something like it,

    but I stopped thinking about it because it feels really foolish.

    But hey, we never know, maybe it IS like this...

  • @Weibkoln Hey Weibkoln, um, you realize what is happening here don't you? You're actually trying to reason with someone who claims the Earth is flat. Why would you do that? OBVIOUSLY I was only joking.

  • @Khyrid

    :D

    I really did have a moment when I thought about something like it,

    and it really felt foolish...

    xD

    Just like now,

    I thought you mean it.......

    ^^

    :)=

  • @Khyrid DUH. And it's on four elephants standing on a turtle.

  • @NoNameLikeThisOne Thanks captain obvious. 

  • @Khyrid Many things wrong with that theory actually.

    1. Earth was believed to once be flat long ago meaning that those papers were published and later disregarded.

    2. Gravity from the Sun locks Earth in a revolution around itself. Sometime in the late future, the Sun will pull earth into it or the Sun will die.

    3. The "plane" will not flip, it will travel on an angle that is equal to that of Earth.

  • @RIGUY75 Um? That is the craziest thing I have every heard.

  • @Khyrid I know right? I just found that on Wikipedia lol

  • i wonder how many ppl prank called that number at the end lol

  • Obama vs Perry_round 1 video.bigmir.net/show/247268/

  • From the mind that brought the Arrivals, 13 Masonic Secrets, The Antichrist Dajaal series and more, comes the new highly-anticipated Documentary series, The Arrived! Keep up with this weekly series at: youtube.com/user/HashemStudios­­com

    Watch it here also in different languages

  • I don't mean to ruin the mood here folks, but fuck this user for ruining youtube with their ads. I wish it was like back in 2005 and 2006 when there weren't annoying ads before every video. I've had enough already.

  • @NayokeHenji then how could youtube make money? Before in 2005 and 2006 there weren't millions and millions of people browsing the site. Youtube also pays people to make videos.

  • @potatoman08 there are other ads other than making people watch videos before a video.

  • @NayokeHenji

    adblock+, get some

  • @pyr666 Mind sending me the link? I'd just google it but I gotta find out what specific one you mean so I can find out if it works with Linux. :p

  • Lol! Gravity force would have been stronger in the past if growing earth theory is correct. Even a 8 years old child would know.

    Mass would have been the same, but distance to center would have been shorter!!!! Please! Read a bit of basic (and I mean really really basic) science!!!!!

  • @0ver10rd You should listen to Neil Adams speak about this to support this theory he thinks more mass is being added by rays from the sun. I think he is certifiable by the way.

  • 079 850 26 27 call me

  • Fucking white people...

  • The expanding earth theory makes sense if the Atlantis and Lemura continents did not exist or were actually mere island kingdoms that sank at the time of something like the alleged long cycle Nibiru Passover. Michio Kaku's 2012 3 UFOs heading earth-way may be water and matter debris stripped from Mars eons ago heading back to pepper Earth with more water and earth mass. Hate to be around when that bombardment start coming down with pole shift and tsunamis bigger than Fukushima or 2004 tsunami.

  • Comment removed

  • illuminati?

  • @zDrizzyz Here we go with this illuminati shit again smh

  • #FAIL NOT EVEN CLOSE. Overpopulation hoax Deforestation hoax Homophobia hoax Silent Spring hoax Nuclear Winter hoax Islamophobia hoax Ozone Hole hoax Global Warming hoax ... all those are vastly bigger hoaxes.
  • @TylerNull HOMOS ARE REAL!!!! JUST ASK YOUR DADDY! HE'S THE BIGGEST HOMO OF THEM ALL!

  • Now I want to go to the library of confress

  • Yeah, the planet growing sounds reasonable, but where the heck did all the water come from then?

  • @1234gnrslash Where the heck did it come from in the first place? Comets. Earth wasn't formed with water and everything from the start, even Biblically.

  • @lgvereor Yeah I know that, but I believe the development of the oceans took much longer than this theory, which shows that the majority of the water on the planet came AFTER Pangaea... and to say that large bodies of water mostly didn't appear on the "smaller Earth", but formed afterward, is to say our planet is MUCH younger than dating technologies (along with other evidence) would show. Unless a HUGE amount of comets just formed all the oceans in that time, and barely any hit before that..?

  • @1234gnrslash Of course, most significant ideas DO go against the grain of current science before they are accepted... I'm not trying to instantly discredit the theory, there's just a looot of holes...

  • @1234gnrslash This theory only accounts for the landmass, ice isn't amounted for, so Pangea theoretically, and probably did considering the current earth, have some sort of ice poles.

    Step back a minute and think though. Had the earth been much bigger than it is today, ie add the moon's mass as it's the current scientific consensus that it is the effect of a failed planet hitting earth, the earth would have been too close to properly cool off, until much later. (The sun was bigger back then.)

  • @1234gnrslash So consider this timeline.

    Earth is size of current day, gets hit and loses mass, is still fairly molten and reforms, cools. Pangea is born. Comets hit earth, creating water, which freezes all over, first ice age in a way. Tectonics start fully going, creating heat and crevices, water begins forming.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @lgvereor It just seems unlikely that the entirety of our oceans formed in the last 200 million years (considering our planet is billions of years old). Maybe there WERE large bodies of water before, but they vanished...creating a (comparitively) dry Pangaea. Still, I don't believe there was a complete absence of oceans before the continents drifted apart, because there was plenty of time for them to form...

  • @1234gnrslash This theory only accounts for land, there are lakes, rivers, and possibly seas to add into the equation.

    You need water to produce life in evolution's current form, oceans are not habitable for this, but freshwater swamps, which is something you would see extensively in this Pangea theory, are.

  • @1234gnrslash Life forms from these new chemical reactions, which sounds more viable than the ocean theory, as a swamp proves more friendly to early life. Lakes start forming, remember this is over the course of billions of years, life can now spread more properly. The rest is fairly simple, go from there.

  • the goverment said the roswell incedent was a crashed weather balloon but that balloon was found 10 days befor the incedent

  • The claim that the earth is growing is FASLE, but the earth was formed from a large continent that split and changed over time

    1: the levels of water could have only changed from impacts of comets, meaning that this super continent would have been completely submerged in water, hope dinosaurs can swim

  • 2: the increasing size of the earth defies physics, the principles of mass and gravity, besides if the earth was small it would have to be due to increased gravity, this would mean life on the planet would benefit from a lower centre of gravity, although would need larger muscle mass which would be indicated in their bone structure, The bone density would also be greater, ignoring the fact of water levels

  • 3: complex life on earth only arose very late in its life cycle the earth is 4.54 billion years old, where as the dinosaurs only died out 65 millions year ago, meaning the earth would already be about the same size it is now when the dinosaurs walked the earth

  • 4: life itself arose from the moons gravitational pull that was a lot stronger as the moons orbit was closer to the earth (due to it spiralling slowly away), this effect caused the tides to lash against rocks eroding them, putting their ingredients into the sea, that allowed the amino acids that then went on to form the 1st life on earth, with the small earth theory there would be no land for tides to lash upon

    There are other reasons but these are sufficient to prove small earth theory false

  • first one could be the first russian porn mp3

  • @Zaxerc HAHAHAHA! XD !Nice! 

  • continued: meaning that we'd have to have evolved from dinosaurs or some sort of bird to have existed and another foreign species of animal would have had to evolve into the monkey during the ice age in order to live meaning that our said cavemen were probably not cavemen at all but a species of monkey that probably evolved into the chimpanzee meaning that all we have left of it is it's fossilized remains. Now i'm done :)

  • continued: for another millenium or two until finally the continents started to drift revealing a body of water for life forms to have a water source to drink from so they could live but that brings on another question if dinosaurs evolved off of water dwelling creatures and flying animals evolved off dinosaurs then we'd have to have evolved off of another creature because said primate theory would be irrelevant due to heat in the jurassic age primates with fur would die from heat exhaustion.

  • umm yeah i'm not very good when it comes to plate tectonics and the drifting of said continents but as far as I know the continents (not very sure about this) are made out of hardened magma/lava/rock which would form from spouts coming from our earths core example: volcano so to say pangea is real is to say there are several closely aligned magma spouts that made a huge supercontinent that covered all of earth but that would suffocate all bodies of water meaning lifeforms couldn't have formed

  • vlogbrothers = place for everyone here

  • As far as the expanding earth idiocy goes, people please stop embarrassing yourselves and learn about plate tectonics. There are ridges in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean for example where the crust is expanding and subduction zones elsewhere where one continental plate goes under another. Hence the large amount of volcanism around the Pacific Ocean. The smashing of the Indian plate into the Eurasian plate is what caused the Himalayan mountains. Thank you and good night.

  • @TruthSeeker235

    You've got that exactly backwards there sparky. Europe and North America are drifting away from each other due to the expansion of the mid-Atlantic Ridge.

  • smaller earth theory is simply moronic.. that is all

  • . #LOL

  • They left out the biggest and most profitable hoax of all time : The HOLOHOAX!

  • @OFFENDOR I lol'd big time at this comment xD

  • LOL

  • This person should see what I reveal in my profile

  • Global warming is in fact number 1

  • SO apperently this has turned into a scince debate so i geuss im abot to join this so yes the continents are moving and yes they fit like a jigsaw puzzule and couldnt it be possible for the earth to change size by changes in density and composition of materials in it at the time although it leaves me to belive the earth has actually shrunk because at first the earth was a large molten blob that because of the heat it would have expanded then it cooled and there for Shrunk

  • @KiteFlyingGuy Meteors hit the earth and add their mass to the planet. Very slowly, but this is in fact the actual natural process that made the earth what it is today. It is still going on.

  • @name887 But at a too slow rate. The earth would have increased by more than a millimeter a year. Or more than 10 centimeters in a century. I notice that NONE of the cities have been damaged by large meteors. There is to little Cosmic dust. the total amount of rock that would have to fall is 500 billion tones a year, the amount that is estimated is 40,000 tones. Considering the usual speed for asteroids then the total energy is 10 - 20 trillions tones of TNT annually. OUCH!

  • @11cookeaw1 You conveniently left out the fact that we have an atmosphere. A wall of gas which protects us from nearly every meteor to pass by or into Earth. Where do you think the material that makes up those meteors go when they burn up? It falls to the ground as dust. And what the hell does the kinetic energy of those asteroids have anything to do with it? They all fall apart and slow in the mesosphere. And where did you get the figure 1mm/year?

  • @name887 I would just like to point out that Jupiter protects us from most comets and the Moon protects us from another good percentage while the Earth's atmosphere is only a last line of defense.

  • @ShokuaK I can't argue logically with an illogical statement. You're assumptions about the Moon and Jupiter are simply wrong.

  • @name887 These aren't assumptions; these are facts I learned by watching "How the Universe Works", but I never wanted to argue with you in the first place.

  • @TruthSeeker235 Columbus sailed toward America in 1492 and would be now 30 ft farther than now so.... you're wrong!

  • Comment removed

  • 1.05 look like face

  • 300,000 expected at Fatima on June 29/30 to witness the star of Bethlehem (a planetary alignment not seen in 2000 years) and the Mother of God's seventh and final visit to Fatima, Portugal to begin the 7 weeks of Tribulation. She says Rome will be destroyed on August 17, 2011 for its Abomination. Here is the when, the how, the why and how it got this bad: make this go viral!!!! The Illuminati have lost.

    FATIMAMOVEMENT d o t c o m

  • The nice part is how you can get a good laugh about all the crazy shit people actually believe.

    The scary part is all those hordes of idiots out there who actually believe all this makes sense and probably is a conspiracy. Maybe we should be grateful, the weirdos are more easily spotted this way.

  • @SteveSpicerPortsmuth Yes, we will exterminate those who are slowing this economy from growing and build a stronger nation at last. Seig heil.

    Get outta here man

  • @BeakyRed Wow, his comment was just about idiots showing themselves to be idiots. You're either a troll or a moron for making such ridiculous assumptions as "it's good that idiots point themselves out = KILL THEM ALL".

  • @ladders1 i didnt really mean it, i was just comparing him to a nazi

  • @BeakyRed Yes, and I was questioning the grounds on which you made that comparison.

  • No piltdown man? If anything should be on that list, it's piltdown man

  • It's classic salesmanship: who, exactly, NAMED our various "Ages"? "The Middle Ages"(how the heck do WE know that?), "The Bronze Age", "The Renaissance", "The Dark Ages", "The Restoration", "The Baroque Period"? I don't trust scientists and archeologists(a false "profession" if there ever was one)anymore. Their egos are too hungry, then too inflated. They're icons of a false religion.

  • Growing Earth theory isn't disputed by geologists at all. It's bullshit without proof that only pseudoscientists belives in.

  • the thing is neither religion nor science can explain a lot of things.

    im like hell, just go with it

  • @kawaiianimegurl You owe me five bucks. Just go with it.

  • oh wait the goverment said that Roswell wasn't aliens! how could i be so stupid to of even thought it was for even a second

  • @soups321 : The government says all kinds of things, and makes a fortune on the theater it creates around them. Intelligent, stable observers need not apply.

  • Meteorites and asteroid impacts could give us some of the mass.

  • nothing comes of out of nothing , earth getting bigger ? how ? are u telling me that the earth is filled with air inside ? idiots

  • @ArchHamza Objects spinning or moving at high speeds causes them to expand. Hense Objects in motion stay in motion and wants to remain in a straight line but what if you take a sphere...every vertex expands at the same time. Cheers!

  • @xineo15 Actually, it expands in the plane perpendicular to the the axis of rotiation, which causes the material parallel to the axis of rotation to compress, this is why the Earth isn't spherical; its diameter is greater at the equator than at the poles, which is why there is an experimentally measurable (though negligible on a human scale) difference in the gravity at thee areas. If the Earth just expanded in all directions, as you suggest, it would have flown apart long before any...

  • @ladders1 ...significant increase in size.

  • If you cant keep a secret,circulate10 rumours.Its not necessary that these storys are reasonable.Open recognizable lies may serve better in attracting the attention of the masses.In wild discussions about obvious fakes the case and its facts get lost.This is what we see in discussions about 911.However,as many of the fakes blame the US government we are pretty safe to assume that these rumours are circulated by a foreign secret service

    The German BND murdered my brother because of our homepage

  • How convient that the air force releases this book and report explaining weather ballons? lol bullshit that is one conspiracy theory that i believe in 100% there was alien life found and ofc they cover it up geez how stupid do they think the public is? lol weather ballons xd

  • lol the earth isn't getting bigger.

  • i don't think the earth is getting bigger, it's not a balloon.

    my theory is that it was a blue planet at first (water surface) and the magma just kept on surfacing till it created a continent that later got divided little by little because of more points from where magma emerges.

    if u look it up u will also find out that the continents are moving even now, but it's just a centimeter or so every few years.

  • The old John Bircher "UN world-government" conspiracy theory has been recycled by a number of Internet radio hosts as the "New World Order" conspiracy theory in recent years and, after the UFO groups, would seem to be the leading fringe belief.

    It seems very popular with the far-right.

  • if the 'conspiracy' is that the goverment is hiding something on a military base, and then the goverment releases a book explaining why the 'conspiracy' is wrong. why would that book be expected to be actually true evidence?

    if a murderer releases a book explaing he didnt murder a bunch of people..do we immidiatly let him free?

    also the goverments official position is that area 51 does not exist

  • i dont agree with the "expanding earth" theory. 1st of all, where is the new material coming from and no one say space because most materials burn up in the atmosphere before even reaching the ground. someone said that volcanoes were the cause, how can that be? they bring up material from inside the earth, wouldnt the earth shrink from losing more and more material from inside itself? and lastly how would we not know? With all the scientists we have now, i find that hard to believe.

  • This compilation suck.One of the biggest hoax and proudly american,like others, is the moonlanding hoax."Supposedly" desacredited by mythbusters and NASA.I liked Adam Sandler but I can swallow your proofs in collaboration with NASA.

    That's why I doubt anything that comes from the uncle sam land.

  • history as we know it is 99.99% fake. real human history is million times greater. they hide it from us. instead they gave us stupid religions that keep us in slavery.

  • @kzjam Was ist mit den 0,1 % ?

  • @kzjam someone had a boring history professor *sheesh*.

  • @kzjam yeah it is to keep from humanity advancing especially in Science.

  • all of these theories are true. that statue is real a mans bones are inside.

  • dont mix conspiracies with theories. what was the growing Earth, a theory? it is a theory and cant be called a hoax, because there is no way to disprove it. but it actually is very reasonable theory. i think that most of us know and agree that stars and our sun grow, become less dense and bigger in volume, the same can be and probably is happening with the Earth.

  • this video is backwards and biased in a way

  • Actually, the expanding Earth thing would make more sense than Plate Techtonics.

  • @SpadaccinoLuciano Then where did all the extra mass come from? How about the water? If the Earth was much smaller then the oceans would have entirely covered the planet and be many many miles deep, and all land-based life would have had to evolve in the last million years, and anything that flies would would have had even less time. The expanding Earth hypothesis makes no sense at all.

  • @ladders1 Oh what, and plate technotics does? Besides Im not so sure about evolution anymore theres so many GAPING holes in it. Perhaps as it rained it filled up the expanding holes. Or maybe the "Fish for some unknown reason grew legs" hypothosis found Fish crawling out of caves that led to a massive underground ocean.

  • @SpadaccinoLuciano Firstly, plate tectonics is a well established science and I have yet to see any actual contradiction of it, whereas the expanding Earth hypothesis has gaping holes such as those I described. Secondly, your criticism of evolution is obviously based on ignorance of the subject, please look into it.

  • @ladders1 I really dont feel like arguing with two people at the same time on the same video, thats pretty much just spam. No offense.

  • @SpadaccinoLuciano Spam is pointless repetitive messages. I'm merely addressing your flawed logic. There is a massive difference.

  • @ladders1 I relize and respect that, my logic was flawed, I'm trying to say that it is just as BAD as spam, with other peoples opinions and comments either over looked, or unable to be in view for very long before our comments push them away. (Please excuse any nonsense, typos, and grammar errors, I have a splitting headache at the moment).

  • @SpadaccinoLuciano Ah, sorry, I misunderstood your previous comment.

  • @ladders1 I appreciate your understanding now.

  • @ladders1 Asteroids. Asteroid impacts over the course of billions of years to be exact. Asteroids carry mass such as organic compounds and yes....you guessed it....WATER (in the form of ice). The majority of these impacts can be attributed to the main asteroid belt situated between the orbits of Mars and Jupiter.

    The expanding Earth hypothesis makes astounding sense. Today, there's still accumulating evidence (mainly geological) showing that Earth's continents were once connected.

  • @eBooksUnited The rate at which asteroids impact the Earth is massively insufficient to explain the alleged increase in mass. If that did happen there would be a mass extinction at least every thousand years and as such no life more complex than rodents.

    And yes, the continents were at one (and several other points) connected, they formed one singular gigantic continent called pangea, this is a well established theory. Look it up.

  • @ladders1 Hundreds of asteroids hit our planet daily. It may not seem like much, but in the long run (4.5 billion years) it's a gross increase to contribute to the described mass. The size of them are too small to wipe out life as we know it.

    Life killers are a rare occurrence, it's estimated that:

    - asteroids with a diameters of 1 kilometer hit the Earth an average of twice every million year interval

    - asteroids with diameters of 5 kilometers happen about once every ten million years

  • @eBooksUnited You're using the term asteroid incorrectly, what you are referring to are meteors, and even at that rate the addition of mass is still massively insufficient. Hence my point that the required addition of mass would make impacts that cause mass extinction extremely common.

  • @ladders1 A meteor burns up in the Earth's atmosphere, while a meteorite survives its passage through the Earth's atmosphere and impacts the Earth's surface. You are using the term incorrectly, while asteroids can still correlate directly to this situation.

    On average it's estimated we receive 360,000 lb a day from space debris such as meteorites (at its upper limit a little more than double that). Multiply that by 4.5 billion years, plus the massive asteroids which caused extinction.

  • @ladders1 PS, I do not disregard tectonics either. Both forces are at work here.

  • @eBooksUnited Mass of the Earth = 1.316e29 lb

    3.6e5 X 365.25 = 1.3149e8 lbs of meteorite per year.

    Therefore, over 4.5 billion years: 1.3149e8 X 4.5e9 = 5.91705e17 lb

    That's a difference of 12 orders of magnitude, i.e. 1 trillion times less than the mass of the Earth. If using double the value (the upper limit you suggested) that figure is still 100 billion times less than the mass of earth. As I have said, the extra mass needed for the theory of an expanding Earth cannot be explained by the...

  • @ladders1 ...known rate of asteroid impact, it is MASSIVELY insufficient. Basic mathematics destroys the theory. Yes, meteorites do add mass to the Earth but it is negligible, at it's most, over the entire lifetime of the planet, it is less than 1 per cent of 1 per cent of 1 per cent of 1 per cent of 1 per cent of the mass of the Earth.

    Also, the distinction between meteor and meteorite is marginal compared to that between asteroid and meteorite. We were both wrong in the use of the terms...

  • @ladders1 ...but you were far more so.

  • @ladders1 Correct, now add this to your calculation: The dust/gas from the Sun's solar nebula took about 10-20 million years to form into the Earth, starting with the molten center (eventually forming a crust/cooling the earth). The bombardment of space debris tapered off as everything settled and was set into less collisional orbit; these collisions became less frequent. Even 250-300 million years ago the debris intake was far more significant than now (Around the time 'Pangaea' existed). 

  • @eBooksUnited If the Earth was increasing in size due to collisions then these collisions would only become more and more common as the Earth grew, regardless of the orbit. You have accurately described how the Earth formed, but this did not take as many billions of years as you imply. The size has been fairly constant for a billions of years. The interconnectedness of the continents is irrelevant as the continents didn't even exist in this time-frame, nor did the oceans...

  • @ladders1 ...You are just cherry-picking small pieces of well established theories, whilst ignoring other larger associated parts that contradict your position. The expanding Earth "theory" (the term hypothesis being the only one that should be used), as presented in the video, is thoroughly ridiculous.

  • @ladders1 250-300 million years ago there was a continent and there was oceans.

  • @eBooksUnited Seas*

  • @ladders1 Do you really think there's been this steady, never changing, entering of debris into Earth's atmosphere for the past 4.5 billion years? It took only 20 million years to create Earth (according to the theories) and you're disregarding the other 4.5 billion? There is still an amazing amount of that same material entering our atmosphere today. Most of it has formed planets,asteroids,etc. NOTE: There is far less of the nebula's dust/gas then there was before. This happens over time....

  • @eBooksUnited My point was the debris entering the atmosphere has only increased, any way you look at it it is massively insufficient to lend any evidence to the expanding Earth hypothesis.

    If something the size of Earth needs to billions of ye