@evanfrikkenjones Yes there was 1 time where CO2 levels were maby 7000 ppm but i can assure you during that one and only time NO animal lived on the surfice of the earth.
And because you dont seam to know any better CO2 isent the only thing that decides tempratures but right now IT IS the major cause for global warming
moron, its no question CO2 increese warmth and we have already way past the "natrual" absorption so CO2 AND OTHER GASES meaning it will NEVER lessen and keep rising
MANY people has also fiddled with the data but the results are unanimous and we will cause the natural balance to crumble so have fun with all the natural disasters :)
@livingproofof 1922 article Global warming look it up. here is a sample:Great masses of ice have been replaced by moraines of earth and stones, the report continued, while at many points well known glaciers have entirely disappeared. Very few seals and no white fish are found in the eastern Arctic, while vast shoals of herring and smelts, which have never before ventured so far north, are being encountered in the old seal fishing grounds.
By 1970 Co2 had gone up by about 35 PPM, with hardly any effect. {According to the graph} The next 60 PPM raised the temps somewhere around 6 degrees C. WHY? Increasing Co2 at lower levels should have a larger effect than the same amount of increase at higher levels. Also, because the Co2 increased at a slower rate it would have allowed heat to build build up in the system for a longer time period. 100 years. Something is very wrong with this graph.
1950/1960s coal contained a LOT of sulphate impurities, invoking an anthropogenic cooling working against CO2-driven warming. By the 1970s international agreements limited the amount of sulphur in coal fuel. Thereafter, the warming effect from the CO2 released by the coal, dominated temperature signals. i.e. there were less sulphate particles to offset any CO2 warming.
Yes this dose seam oversummerised, leaving it more open to criticism than it needs to be, it would certainly be interesting to know more about how the grapes were made.
yes the temperature has gone much higher in the past from natural courses, but as I understand it what really alarms scientists is the speed of this change which could leave ecosystems unable to adapt therefore removing the main way in which temperatures could be brought down again.
WHY is it that the YELLOW curb, representing CO2 FOLLOWS the Temperature line? If CO2 & greenhouse gases CAUSE temperature fluctuations, shouldn't they go up or down BEFORE the red line?
Take that chart, go back past 1850 & see what happens-you'll see Earth has had higher temp spikes than we're experiencing now, yet polar bears are still around.
Look at the politics behind the Global Warming agenda.
@evanfrikkenjones Yes there was 1 time where CO2 levels were maby 7000 ppm but i can assure you during that one and only time NO animal lived on the surfice of the earth.
And because you dont seam to know any better CO2 isent the only thing that decides tempratures but right now IT IS the major cause for global warming
Dasmaster1 1 year ago
moron, its no question CO2 increese warmth and we have already way past the "natrual" absorption so CO2 AND OTHER GASES meaning it will NEVER lessen and keep rising
MANY people has also fiddled with the data but the results are unanimous and we will cause the natural balance to crumble so have fun with all the natural disasters :)
Dasmaster1 1 year ago
WORLD TEMPS ARE UP ESPECIALLY OVER ASIA, WHICH IS CLOSE IN PROXIMITY TO THE ICE CAP AS IS CALIFORNIA!
DO NOT LISTEN TO SCIENTISTS, DO? YOUR OWN RESEARCH , WHICH IS POSSIBLE WITH ONLINE DATA THAT NASA HAS PUBLISHED
Austin
-- July 2009 was the hottest all-time month on record in Austin (Camp Mabry).
-- July 2009 had an average temperature of 89.5 degrees in Austin.
San Antonio
-- July 2009 was the hottest all-time month on record in San Antonio.
livingproofof 2 years ago 2
@livingproofof 1922 article Global warming look it up. here is a sample:Great masses of ice have been replaced by moraines of earth and stones, the report continued, while at many points well known glaciers have entirely disappeared. Very few seals and no white fish are found in the eastern Arctic, while vast shoals of herring and smelts, which have never before ventured so far north, are being encountered in the old seal fishing grounds.
Xxoax 2 years ago
If anyone can see anything wrong with my logic please point it out. I'm all ears. I do like to learn.
m8s4lif 2 years ago
If 60 PPM will increase temps .6 degrees in about 30 years, then 35 PPM should have made a quite a splash over 100 years.
m8s4lif 2 years ago
Whoops, I goofed. Make that about .6 degrees C.
m8s4lif 2 years ago
By 1970 Co2 had gone up by about 35 PPM, with hardly any effect. {According to the graph} The next 60 PPM raised the temps somewhere around 6 degrees C. WHY? Increasing Co2 at lower levels should have a larger effect than the same amount of increase at higher levels. Also, because the Co2 increased at a slower rate it would have allowed heat to build build up in the system for a longer time period. 100 years. Something is very wrong with this graph.
m8s4lif 2 years ago
1950/1960s coal contained a LOT of sulphate impurities, invoking an anthropogenic cooling working against CO2-driven warming. By the 1970s international agreements limited the amount of sulphur in coal fuel. Thereafter, the warming effect from the CO2 released by the coal, dominated temperature signals. i.e. there were less sulphate particles to offset any CO2 warming.
stashcode 2 years ago
Comment removed
ohtoobeetall 2 years ago
Thank you for your reply. What you said does make allot of sense.
m8s4lif 2 years ago
Comment removed
m8s4lif 2 years ago
Comment removed
m8s4lif 2 years ago
Comment removed
m8s4lif 2 years ago
Yes this dose seam oversummerised, leaving it more open to criticism than it needs to be, it would certainly be interesting to know more about how the grapes were made.
yes the temperature has gone much higher in the past from natural courses, but as I understand it what really alarms scientists is the speed of this change which could leave ecosystems unable to adapt therefore removing the main way in which temperatures could be brought down again.
owenbevt3 2 years ago
Im no scientist ... but isnt say 150 years a little short to be making conclusions
Lodi0 3 years ago
WHY is it that the YELLOW curb, representing CO2 FOLLOWS the Temperature line? If CO2 & greenhouse gases CAUSE temperature fluctuations, shouldn't they go up or down BEFORE the red line?
Take that chart, go back past 1850 & see what happens-you'll see Earth has had higher temp spikes than we're experiencing now, yet polar bears are still around.
Look at the politics behind the Global Warming agenda.
Look at the actual science behind it.
Listen to both sides.
It's all about POLITICS-not EARTH.
schritefallow 3 years ago
I would like the science behind those lines explained more, but this is interesting.
UWrosesdawg 3 years ago
there you have it!
simonpra 4 years ago