3. A perfect planet...the formation of the earth

[Aluminata]

For 100's of millions of its' formative years the molten Planet would have been completely cocooned in a thick shroud of fluffy white cloud until it cooled sufficiently to allow the water vapour to condense and settle into the oceans...

[letshavefun41]

um...why does the man look like an animation,but the animations look completly real

[ndog37]

This is nothing more than a science fiction fantasy. In the universe today there are no observable planets or suns forming. Hey its only 13billion years old so there should be one right? Lol. It is so laughable that this rubbish is taught to kids

[getitrightwillyou]

@ndog37 I think you will find that every Nebula in the universe is showing star (sun creation) and we have found many planets that were formed in the way described. Given the billions and billions of suns (we are only able to check out a few million for planets) it is not surprising we have found no other planets as unique as earth. I ,for one, prefer this observational approach to "Some great being created everything cos I know what people in the past have said about it and I think it's true!"

[classiq876]

Really? where is the evidents for this? who was there when this thing happen? until then science is just a make up opinion. man made all these things up and try to prove it by not even giving proof. lol this is sooo pathetic.

[flagman57]

@classiq876 It has been proven. Scientists have seen formations of other planets in all stages of the development pattern shown in this video. There is much that can be inferred from what we know about how matter coalesces. Also, the moon creation theory came from the fact that oxygen isotope readings and those of several other materials were similar to that of earth, leading to this inference. I assume you are religious from the way you are commenting. Let me break this to you slowly.

[flagman57]

@classiq876 (cont.) The idea of God is from the Bronze Age of human civilization, when gods were created as an explanation of the Earth. Now that we can objectively explain these various aspects of the universe, what is the need for a God? Its to provide relief for the unknown and the unknowable, such as death. People use it as a way to escape their ignorance when in fact they are just making up ideas to comfort themselves, much like an imaginary friend.

There is no God. He is a myth

[sentiencetv]

It's been calculated that the sun has enough Hydrogen for burn for around another 7 Billion years..

[claymation1nation]

@sentiencetv5 billion years its half way done :(

[flagman57]

@sentiencetv I believe it was 5 billion

[Codymixmasta]

I heard the Sun has enough Hydrogen to burn for about 10,000 years.

[splicedenergy]

@Codymixmasta You heard very wrong.

[RetardedChickenVids]

@Codymixmasta 5 billion at the least.

[robertus911]

I kind of think that gravity played the major part in the make up of stars and planets. lets just say there where pockets of hydrogen surounded by dark matter. This dark matter compressed the hydrogen atoms to where gravity caused a great big explosion and the sun and planets where formed . Some of the matter that expanded caused convection currents as the cooled quickly by the dark matter. What the planet became depended on the gravity created by the amount of matter. in the convection curr

[robertus911]

@robertus911 In other words in the beginning you had one large sun surrounded by many little suns after an explosion. How ever because of the gravity differances in the smaller suns this chemical changes took place on the surface. In other words planets are baby sun that because of the smaller gravity attractions/ The surface of these baby sun are differnt. You might look at it this way that we live on a baby sun. and it is still active. Maybe in the center of our planet we have a small sun

[XCypher1993]

still doesn't explain how any of this comes into existence.... it just says "it blew up and made that" the whole time

[APkillgamer]

any niggas doin this for a science class?

[blahblibidyblahblah]

@APkillgamer nope.  Just us Asian, Latino and white folk

[5hazmat]

It's very beautiful if you think about it. Our Earth evolving from this volcanic, barren wasteland into the beautiful place it is today that is able to support life. Bloody hell I love science.

[philetofsoul]

Pangea was only 250 million years ago. This video makes it seem like pangea formed when earth first cooled, over 4 billion years ago. You had me up to that point, though.

[shpotik]

what a fairy tale



[caporalchef4]

@shpotik LOL!! The Bible's genesis is more like one would literaly call a ''fairy tale'' with its fallen angels, earthly paradise, woman created out of a rib and talking snakes...Wait...Yeah, on second guess, it makes a hell of a lot more sense than science...Creatard.

[flotopo]

@caporalchef4,

So you believe science is 100% true in all its statements and it is the only means to finding the truth, right? Tell me then how does science explain the Big Bang, which science see as event responsible for the beginning of the Universe? Science says "everything we see came from nothing without anybody's intervention". I have to say that's very......unscientific! :))) Just check it out, if you don't believe me. Even today science doesn't know how life "appeared" on Earth. Sad...!

[caporalchef4]

@flotopo I'm not gonna waste any time here debunking your rather ignorant rants. Use the internet and get an education.

[flotopo]

@caporalchef4 ,

The internet says nothing on how the Universe came to be, simply because science knows nothing about it.Science stipulates that time, space, matter and energy came to be at the birth of the Universe, which logically follows that none of those existed before the event, therefore "everything came from nothing" is the most apparently logical explanation and yet...it isn't. It is also unscientific, but you are the ignorant that takes info in without asking questions or thinking. ;-)

[caporalchef4]

@flotopo Still here talking to yourself, buddy?

[IndividualParties]

@flotopo

I’m a physics major myself; they don't teach that the Universe popped into existence out nothing. Although the HYPOTHESIS is coherent in terms of quantum mechanics, it is not an accepted scientific theory, nor is it a part of the Big Bang model. It is more popular among elite scientists more so than common researchers. However, your claim that the hypothesis is unscientific is also false, and just an assumption your making from your own incredulity.

[flagman57]

@IndividualParties Recent theory found that the universe is flat, and in a flat universe the total net energy is 0 (due to gravity having a negative energy). Thus, it is possible to create this universe out of nothing because technically, no energy is required to produce this universe. Is this a theory or hypothesis?

[produktXmodelmaking]

'perfect' for life? How so?

[sentiencetv]

@produktXmodelmaking check out the next video in the series called 4. How life began

[IMakeBridVids]

...So How Came Life ?

[OptimalElement]

@IMakeBridVids

Thats Abiogenesis

[xmxaxtxhxexwx]

God. Thats different. Thats proof.

[racheleaston43]

that guy wrong our sun was never lit up 4.5 billon years ago

[sentiencetv]

@racheleaston43 Can you enlighten everyone? The 4.5 billion is an approximation but (as Wikepedia also states):

The formation and evolution of the Solar System is estimated to have begun 4.568 billion years ago with the gravitational collapse of a small part of a giant molecular cloud.[1]

I would love to hear what you know that is different.

[sziro]

Thanks for this video. The explanation was very simple and clear, even for a non english speaker like me.

[darkforceunlashed]

yuca con pan

[ppd8472]

This series is very enlightening! Thank you so much for creating these.