To follow up my previous comment: wouldn't you work your ass off if you knew that you'd get 3 months salary for 1 week? Even in a creative profession.
My main gripe with this video is that Dan seems to be skimming over the issues/research and jumping to conclusions. E.G. some of our main motivators/drives are gathering resources and raising offspring safely. So, when he says punishment doesn't work because the parents were late even with the fine, he didn't consider the fact that maybe 1: the fine was too small (would they be late if we were talking about 200 dollars?) 2: what if the punishment was getting the kids kicked out of the daycare?
Thanks everyone for your comments. Please, please show your love for the RSAnimate series and vote for RSAnimate - Drive - in the Webby Awards in the Animation category. Help us continue to spread world-changing ideas farther and wider (and always for free)! Vote here: webby.aol.com/entries/59107
Fan of Pink and what he stands for and believes in terms of business. It may not work in every workplace but it works in many that try giving the autonomy, mastery, and purpose to their staff.
I would like to have the pleasure of writing or sharing a stage with this man.
Take a look at a my 2 min. clip from a recent business group motivational speech I gave in Birmingham, Alabama to over 200 major business leaders @ iwillmedia on youtube.
Being a business owner, consultant and speaker myself, I have introduced these principles to companies from tiny start-ups to giants in fields from magazine publishing to health club management, to sales, I find Daniel Pink to be absolutely right. Money matters but creativity does not stem from it. The old way of management is broken. Businesses need to embrace these new methods and prove to themselves that it does work!
Will Estell, Author|Speaker: Wisdom & Wisecracks for Entrepreneurs
Easily some of the most important information in applied behavioral economics I've heard. As far as I can see this is very on point, very insightful. I think Dan Pink is on to something, and it's exciting.
To clarify though, I don't think the entire seminar or his point is wrong. It's just that the test has to be the same for both if you are going to compare the results, pretty simple really.
What I don't get is how they have a different test when they test mechanical skill, rudimentary cognitive tasks and when they have the test of higher than rudimentary cognitive skill.
He says the people got a reward based upon their performance in the first test.
But in the second test they were offered their reward before performing the task? And was expected to do better when they already knew what they were getting paid?
Now, I'm a socialist personally, but I still think this was wrong.
@derghb The second test conducted in India was done with the same parameters as the first test done in the US. The only difference is that the monetary rewards were more significant in the Indian experiment because $50 USD to a person in India can purchase a lot more compared to what can be purchased in the US.
Dan Pink has come up 3 times in the last day from different directions. Science and economic studies that explain the conflicts I have been seeing in business and organizations for decades. I have a whole new paradigm to work from and share with others.
A Question - what is better?
1) To watch 'TED' type (RSA, BookNotes, TED, Charlie Rose, etc) talks of thought leaders that are the distillation of their work after presenting it 100's of time.
I have worked at a Hotel for almost 3 years, (I don't believe in Hotels, btw) and what I can say is that I never felt good with it. I worked hard for about 6 months, despite the pay wasn't so great as it should be for a 4 stars hotel (and later as 5 stars the pay was not any better) but the biggest turn down I faced there was that I never got any recognition for what I did well. Bosses always seemed to focus only on what we failed doing. That has always been my biggest incentive: Recognition.
@skaruts I totally agree, I worked at a corporate ran restaurant who hired managers from seniority and not actual trained management. These people would focus in on anything negative that was done and very little on the positives. Recognition in my opinion falls under purpose. If we do something very well and are recognized for it. I think this sense of belonging builds up in us of doing something better that people appreciate and the purpose in which we do it becomes more satisfying.
Very interesting concepts - helpful to understand motivation and how to engage employees - Challenges the commonly held misconceptions on what motivates people. Thank you.
I'm trying to show a new horizon to my workmates, a diferent paradigm, but most of them do not speak enlglish or understand it. I think that this kind of provoking videos should have subtitles in brazilian portuguese!
Anyways - I'm going to translate the RSA Animate of this issue and broadcast in my company.
@intermender Other guy is Matthew Taylor - CE of the RSA. Maybe check out his RSA Animate Left Brain, Right Brain if you liked his questions? It's on the RSA Channel under RSA Animate playlists. Thanks for the feedback - really appreciate it. Becca :)
@TheRealXenon hence, americans should also have to understand chinese videos, souldnt they? For sure, but they will understand it much better with subtitles
To follow up my previous comment: wouldn't you work your ass off if you knew that you'd get 3 months salary for 1 week? Even in a creative profession.
Pejorativez 2 weeks ago
My main gripe with this video is that Dan seems to be skimming over the issues/research and jumping to conclusions. E.G. some of our main motivators/drives are gathering resources and raising offspring safely. So, when he says punishment doesn't work because the parents were late even with the fine, he didn't consider the fact that maybe 1: the fine was too small (would they be late if we were talking about 200 dollars?) 2: what if the punishment was getting the kids kicked out of the daycare?
Pejorativez 2 weeks ago in playlist Top 10 most viewed RSA Events videos
bob saget rules!!!
handsomerube 4 months ago
Is this woody??
BonAdrian 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SIMPLY',:COPY,;.&';,PASTE;,:
WWW.NEWSTREAMMOVIES.TK
SIMPLY.`'COPY:',&,:;PASTE;;:
EdisonBabcock 8 months ago
hêh_ì_fÉël_só_l0nÉly_tódaÿ
LoveeaaGertieae810 8 months ago
The third drive is what’s motivating me to watch this.
Zyozyoma 9 months ago 7
Thanks everyone for your comments. Please, please show your love for the RSAnimate series and vote for RSAnimate - Drive - in the Webby Awards in the Animation category. Help us continue to spread world-changing ideas farther and wider (and always for free)! Vote here: webby.aol.com/entries/59107
theRSAorg 9 months ago 8
Fan of Pink and what he stands for and believes in terms of business. It may not work in every workplace but it works in many that try giving the autonomy, mastery, and purpose to their staff.
I would like to have the pleasure of writing or sharing a stage with this man.
Take a look at a my 2 min. clip from a recent business group motivational speech I gave in Birmingham, Alabama to over 200 major business leaders @ iwillmedia on youtube.
iWillMedia 1 year ago
Being a business owner, consultant and speaker myself, I have introduced these principles to companies from tiny start-ups to giants in fields from magazine publishing to health club management, to sales, I find Daniel Pink to be absolutely right. Money matters but creativity does not stem from it. The old way of management is broken. Businesses need to embrace these new methods and prove to themselves that it does work!
Will Estell, Author|Speaker: Wisdom & Wisecracks for Entrepreneurs
iWillMedia 1 year ago
Intelligence is hot. In fact it makes this somewhat average looking fellow very hot.
SusannaMrsBMomEtc 1 year ago
I love your connection to science and psychology and business your mind is amazing!
TiffanySouthall 1 year ago
the audio is too quite
maxed with my speakers it is barely audible.
akirosette 1 year ago
Interesting. Reminds me a lot of Alfie Kohn's book, Punished by Rewards. It's definitely worth a read!
mary86 1 year ago
Easily some of the most important information in applied behavioral economics I've heard. As far as I can see this is very on point, very insightful. I think Dan Pink is on to something, and it's exciting.
Neanderthalcouzin 1 year ago
Comment removed
veegta83 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Free market" is ROOT of all problems and is impossible because
1. how do you keep the people on top from controlling everyone?
2. how do you make sure everyone at the bottom is fed, clothed, etc?
ANSWER
1. FREELY Share ALL resources and knowledge worldwide, NO more money/property
2. Use LATEST technology to create an ABUNDANCE of all our needs, NO more scarcity, waste or theft
3. Automate/localize ALL production and distribution, NO more wage/debt slavery
v=YxPPnCW6sMo
v=yPmHaTirnCc
dontblockmedk 1 year ago
To clarify though, I don't think the entire seminar or his point is wrong. It's just that the test has to be the same for both if you are going to compare the results, pretty simple really.
derghb 1 year ago
What I don't get is how they have a different test when they test mechanical skill, rudimentary cognitive tasks and when they have the test of higher than rudimentary cognitive skill.
He says the people got a reward based upon their performance in the first test.
But in the second test they were offered their reward before performing the task? And was expected to do better when they already knew what they were getting paid?
Now, I'm a socialist personally, but I still think this was wrong.
derghb 1 year ago
@derghb: he said it that way, but the way it's meant to be taken is, the people knew the rewards before they took the test.
rshinra 1 year ago
@derghb The second test conducted in India was done with the same parameters as the first test done in the US. The only difference is that the monetary rewards were more significant in the Indian experiment because $50 USD to a person in India can purchase a lot more compared to what can be purchased in the US.
krptd9 1 year ago
Dan Pink has come up 3 times in the last day from different directions. Science and economic studies that explain the conflicts I have been seeing in business and organizations for decades. I have a whole new paradigm to work from and share with others.
A Question - what is better?
1) To watch 'TED' type (RSA, BookNotes, TED, Charlie Rose, etc) talks of thought leaders that are the distillation of their work after presenting it 100's of time.
2) Or to read the source work with all depth?
damianpodcast 1 year ago
Good video, but the audio is unbearable, the distortion is almost painful to hear whenever Dan becomes a but too dynamic...
simulacrae 1 year ago
@simulacrae It gets much better after a few minutes and the pain becomes tolerable. Some great ideas make it worth wading through.
damianpodcast 1 year ago
Sort of beating a dead horse, but nonetheless in a way that can grab other people's attention.
Sicueft 1 year ago
Blender 3D is another great example of people doing extraordinary things for other people for free.
skaruts 1 year ago
I have worked at a Hotel for almost 3 years, (I don't believe in Hotels, btw) and what I can say is that I never felt good with it. I worked hard for about 6 months, despite the pay wasn't so great as it should be for a 4 stars hotel (and later as 5 stars the pay was not any better) but the biggest turn down I faced there was that I never got any recognition for what I did well. Bosses always seemed to focus only on what we failed doing. That has always been my biggest incentive: Recognition.
skaruts 1 year ago
@skaruts I totally agree, I worked at a corporate ran restaurant who hired managers from seniority and not actual trained management. These people would focus in on anything negative that was done and very little on the positives. Recognition in my opinion falls under purpose. If we do something very well and are recognized for it. I think this sense of belonging builds up in us of doing something better that people appreciate and the purpose in which we do it becomes more satisfying.
daimyo21 1 year ago
Very interesting concepts - helpful to understand motivation and how to engage employees - Challenges the commonly held misconceptions on what motivates people. Thank you.
vandyishere 1 year ago
I'm trying to show a new horizon to my workmates, a diferent paradigm, but most of them do not speak enlglish or understand it. I think that this kind of provoking videos should have subtitles in brazilian portuguese!
Anyways - I'm going to translate the RSA Animate of this issue and broadcast in my company.
Great Job!
ramonsilva1 1 year ago
Accessible, clear, thought provoking. Also great questions by that other guy!
intermender 1 year ago 17
@intermender Other guy is Matthew Taylor - CE of the RSA. Maybe check out his RSA Animate Left Brain, Right Brain if you liked his questions? It's on the RSA Channel under RSA Animate playlists. Thanks for the feedback - really appreciate it. Becca :)
theRSAorg 1 year ago 7
@theRSAorg cool, thanks ;)
intermender 1 year ago
much respect! you're amazing!
bugsymj7 1 year ago
daniel pink looks like bob saget
Dan3099 1 year ago 2
this interesting video should have subtitles in the main global languages (spanish, chinese, france, german,...)
prosumero 1 year ago 19
@prosumero either try youtube's auto-caption stuff or do it yourself. translation ain't easy and thus isn't free
telanis9 1 year ago
@prosumero also, volume leveling!!
waXpoet 1 year ago
@prosumero That is may be true, but german, france, spains should understand this?
TheRealXenon 1 year ago
@TheRealXenon americans will have to understand chinese videos too, but subtitles would help, would'nt?
prosumero 1 year ago
@TheRealXenon hence, americans should also have to understand chinese videos, souldnt they? For sure, but they will understand it much better with subtitles
prosumero 1 year ago
genius
entourageLAX 1 year ago