the problem here is you are trying to use your HUMAN brain to understand something that is not limited to a human brain - thus you will always fail - it is not about needed to deduce something - (ie 2 things) because everything is one in god and thus no 2 to deduce from - simply known already - in God all opinions are there simultaneously (excluding none) thus what opinion do you have? NONE is the only possible answer, its too simple for most people to get
so god has no judgment over murderers and normal people? if you fly by plain and see sheep, you say sheep are white on top, but i can't say about their belly? if you see a ball, you can't tell what it is until you see it from all the angels? That's odd, 'cause i can.
well that really does depend upon how you want to define 'god' - if it is something that is 'there' then you are right it does not exist for to exist would suggest a location, and even a beginning middle and end -as the oneness (or god) is all around then you are quite right it does not exist but is merely (of course without personality or opinion so not as we understand being)
The point is that god can not take side becasue to do so would be a rejection of itself - which would mean a separation - not possible for the one thing everywhere 0-
We are still 'Stuck trying to solve the problem with the same mechanisim that created it' as Einstein put it - We can not use our Human Duality logic to comment upon the oneness (god) as it is everywhere - it does not understand what it is like to NOT be everywhere - to NOT feel hot and cold at the same time- to NOT understand both arguments equally!
well then... In theory... god helps everyone in the same amount and loves everyone the same, but ... you can't tell how much does devil hate one person or another.
Therefor can't really say how much bad luck will he bring you... :P ... in theory
I should give a better example,I dont kno what religion your into,im kinda christian than anything else so Ill use 1 of their storys, b4 he was the devil he was known as lucifer, he was the best angel, he got 2 high n mighty n tried 2 convince the angels 2 back him up on his choice to take over as god, half the angels followed, and they too where cast outa heaven along with him. My point, god displayed an oppinion and he acted on it by not allowing lucifer to take his place as god.
If god is everywhere and sees everything at the same time then wouldnt he have an oppinion based on what he sees? Like the freedomfighter/terrorist example you gave, if god sees it all then wouldnt he recognise that the terrorists are against him and the americans are just there to protect america by killing them so he realy wouldnt favor iether side regardless?
Chris can bea little agressive yes...... :o), her definintion of "the argument from personal experence" isn't the same as mine though, I call what she discribed The "argument frrom good fourtune".
the problem here is you are trying to use your HUMAN brain to understand something that is not limited to a human brain - thus you will always fail - it is not about needed to deduce something - (ie 2 things) because everything is one in god and thus no 2 to deduce from - simply known already - in God all opinions are there simultaneously (excluding none) thus what opinion do you have? NONE is the only possible answer, its too simple for most people to get
markabadi 3 months ago
so god has no judgment over murderers and normal people? if you fly by plain and see sheep, you say sheep are white on top, but i can't say about their belly? if you see a ball, you can't tell what it is until you see it from all the angels? That's odd, 'cause i can.
infirnityISnothing 3 months ago
this was very very interesting and explains a lot, thumbs up to this vid :)
dedly13 5 months ago
well that really does depend upon how you want to define 'god' - if it is something that is 'there' then you are right it does not exist for to exist would suggest a location, and even a beginning middle and end -as the oneness (or god) is all around then you are quite right it does not exist but is merely (of course without personality or opinion so not as we understand being)
markabadi 6 months ago
God doesn't exist
Zefiroth1612 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Write "Logical Evidences for Islam" and watch it...
Why is there A Cretaor? Why is there a religion? Why Islam is the true religion?
shncsr 6 months ago
The point is that god can not take side becasue to do so would be a rejection of itself - which would mean a separation - not possible for the one thing everywhere 0-
markabadi 7 months ago
We are still 'Stuck trying to solve the problem with the same mechanisim that created it' as Einstein put it - We can not use our Human Duality logic to comment upon the oneness (god) as it is everywhere - it does not understand what it is like to NOT be everywhere - to NOT feel hot and cold at the same time- to NOT understand both arguments equally!
markabadi 7 months ago
well then... In theory... god helps everyone in the same amount and loves everyone the same, but ... you can't tell how much does devil hate one person or another.
Therefor can't really say how much bad luck will he bring you... :P ... in theory
CELLERTOTEN 7 months ago
I should give a better example,I dont kno what religion your into,im kinda christian than anything else so Ill use 1 of their storys, b4 he was the devil he was known as lucifer, he was the best angel, he got 2 high n mighty n tried 2 convince the angels 2 back him up on his choice to take over as god, half the angels followed, and they too where cast outa heaven along with him. My point, god displayed an oppinion and he acted on it by not allowing lucifer to take his place as god.
JackthehackAtack 8 months ago
If god is everywhere and sees everything at the same time then wouldnt he have an oppinion based on what he sees? Like the freedomfighter/terrorist example you gave, if god sees it all then wouldnt he recognise that the terrorists are against him and the americans are just there to protect america by killing them so he realy wouldnt favor iether side regardless?
JackthehackAtack 8 months ago
Chris can bea little agressive yes...... :o), her definintion of "the argument from personal experence" isn't the same as mine though, I call what she discribed The "argument frrom good fourtune".
greenelf12 8 months ago