thevidboy83 can you please upload this documentary mentioning the year 2008 for federer . in all videos it is upto US open 2007 and the other part which is named "Roger federer - spirit of a champion the greatest" mentions about from Aus open 2009 to Aus open 2010. But here in india on star sports i have seen the extended form of this documentary mentioning Wimbledon 2008, olympics 2008 and of course US open 2008... So try finding that part plssssssss
He plays who's in front of him, simple as that. And let's not revise history here, aside from not reaching nearly as many Major finals as Roger, Pete wasn't exactly winning those titles having to square off against Agassi, Becker (who was readying retirement at the time of Pete's ascent) or any other "all-time" great. Yet he won them fair and square. As has Mr. Federer. Enough said.
Edit to add: Pete wasn't facing off against those players, on a constant basis during Grand Slam events. As someone who followed pro tennis since the 1980s, Pete got much of the same "domination" flak as Fed. Though the key difference from my perspective appears to be nationality.
Were Fed an American (or even Brit for that matter), the amount of coverage would be insufferable. Though I kinda prefer it as is. Allows his racket to do the talking. Leaving his detractors scrambling for yet another way to move the goal post. lol
Wouldn't Nadal have to first start reaching all GS finals as consistently as Fed to have this debate. Also Agassi and Sampras were about the same age, whereas Nadal is 5 years younger than Fed. I think Fed's GS semi and finals records speak for themselves.
The question in my mind is not whether Federer is the greatest player ever... but by how much distance he is the greatest... I think by the time he is done Roger will make sure that he is the greatest player ever... atleast by a mile than his closest rivals Rod Laver... Pete Sampras... and Bjorn Borg...I cannot help negating those poor people who question his greatness because they themselves know that they are wrong.. The point is HE IS THE BEST... like him or not...
u fucking fed hater, u r saying rafa beat roger in wimbeldon 2008 and aus 09...ok,so what? after all fed was under so much pressure to break borg,s record in wimbeldon and tie sampras record in aus 09..but still,he did not lose easily but make rafa run like a deer for 4:30 hours in both games...but roger took jus 2:30 hrs in wimbeldon 2006 and 3;30 hrs during wim 2007.. so,give some other convincing reasons, u cocksucking son of a bitch
no,u dickhead..yours is not convincing reply..it seems u dont understand english. your reply is totally irrelavant to my question. i never said anything about sampras,u asshole...better have ur head examined or have ur mama for sex all the time or get ur dick shaved off
people stop hateing Nadal and saying he is terrible and what has he done. i tell you what hes done at 18 he won the french open and the next 3 years after that he won it easily each year and won a AUS Open at 22 also competeing in one of the greatest finals in history and winning. both Roger and Rafa are excellent players and all of us should feel privlidged to be in the era of Rafa vs Roger. Roger would also not be pleased at fans like you Nadal haters because he respects Nadal very much
I agree to this. I am great Roger fan but Nadal is Nadal. We are so blessed with the existence of these players in our era. Their stories will be a stuff of legend that can be told to our grandchildren, long after this two gentlement will leave the circuit. Instead of bad words, lets celebrate their achievements.
a man that has held the no.1 position for 237 consecutive weeks, has won 15 grand slams. and still has much more time to go in tennis. nothing compared to nadal that has won what? 6 grand slams?
and 4 of them are on clay....so sad....lol nadal is probably the greatest clay player ever. but compare to roger federer, what nadal has achieved is nothing near as great....
You are talking out of your ass, especially since even Nadal talks nicely about Federer. I sure Nadal doesn't even want to have fans like you, so just shut up and do a favor to everyone.
federer is the greatest players ever, but ofc we cant compare him with Borg or macenroe cus they sued some old bad rackets nothing compared with the new ones. anywheys The only one who can Stop federer in a Grand slam I Rafael nadal and he´s the only one who have done it aswell.
Federer is 27 years old. With his excellent physical condition he may reach a playing age similar to Agassi, 35 years. Having said so, he has aproximately 8 more years to play. That means approximately 32 more grand slams. He may not win them all and he may drop his game, but I believe that he ought to win between 20-25 grand slams by the time he retires. Additionaly I believe he can actually improve his game now that he's got rolandgarros off his shoulders, as well as beating Sampras's record.
Great point made... I think Fedex will win 22 slams... and Tiger woods will end up with 25-26 majors... this is just my opinion... because Fedex will play another 6-7 years and tiger woods will play for atleast 20-25 years... so ITS ADVANTAGE TIGER WOODS..
I love this video and thanks for sharing it. Go Roger for 15th Grand Slam title. 2009 is your year. You deserve it. Looking forward on wimbledon final. Just focus on your game, stay calm, don't underestimate your opponent. God Bless...
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Roger better play like this against Murry because Murry's chances are too great. Murry just won in Queens on grace before coming into Wimbledon so his confidence is up, plus he has a 6-2 record against Roger, plus Murry will hav the entire COUNTRY routing for him. Roger doesn't have a chance against Andy Murry.
Congrats, Murry
Sorry, Roger
I love Roger and want him to win, but it's time to face up to reality this year.
You´re a stupid... granted, Murray leads Federer in head-to-head matches, 6 - 2... but did you know that both of Federer´s victories against Murray have come in finals? And that both have a beatdown for Murray (Bankog 2005, not to mention the way he was crushed by Federer in last year´s U.S. Open final)? Besides, they´d play on a grass court, where Federer rules... so, if I were you, I´d seriously doubt about Murray´s ''great chances'' against Federer in a possible Wimbledon final...
so, roger wins his 15 slam at wimbledon. No surprise. So who thinks this years wim was entertaining? Are people getting bored of watching one player dominate or do majority of people marvel at rogers genius? Why cant nobody except nadal challenge roger on grass. Can roger win 10 wimbledons! if so, do you think he should be given the real trophy to keep if he win s10!
I´m a Federer fan, but hey, no, nobody can win 10 Wimbledons... that´ll be like winning it for an entire decade... however, he can win 8! All of this, everyone should know that Federer was up 7 - 6, 0 - 30, in last year´s Wimbledon final (which means that he was two points away from victory)... So, he could have had 1 more Wimbledon trophy... So, whichever is his tally in Wimbledon at the end of his career, we´d have to remember that he let Nadal rob him 1...
C mon.. Rog wimby is yours for sure...and i dnt see any real threat for you in US open.. Damn had u won Aus open you would have completed a Calendar slam... no problem 2010 Aus open is of yours for sure...
Andreev was a real threat to Federer in last year´s U.S. Open eightfinals... of course, Roger´ll win the 2010 Australian Open, and erase that stupid memory of sobbing... I know he won´t retire until he erases that...
Amazing player. Most naturally gifted the game has seen. I think he may end up with 19 slams if he is motivated and gets over the nadal complex. I am sure he will.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Nadal will do roger in the shitter again, again and again until roger cries so loud they will hear him in switzerland. Roger, you are finished. Pack your bags, fuck off back to switerland, turn the TV on and watch how a "true champion" plays.
I dont care how many slams he won, he is without any determination or backbone. He is a pathetic role model for youngster. Nadal is the perfect champion unlike his idiotic predeccessor. He fights to the bone, plays every point like his life depends on it. These are the characteristics of a champion. Roger, keep playing sub standard doubles tennis with that other pathetic swizz friend of yours if that helps you feel like a champion. fucking loser.
he has done that.. he has won the US open and i am very sure that he will win All 4 grand slams of 2009.. it is important to note that French open 2009 will be his 15 grand slam.. :-)
agree mucho! And then by the end of 2009 he will be celebrating his 17th Slam!
cric321: are you unable to watch the video because otherwise you must be blind and deaf at the same time to not be able to see the true and humble champion of Roger Federer
Why do you think he will??? I personally consider Rafael Nadal invincible on clay and very good at grass as well. If Federer is looking to be number 1 again he'll have to do well on hard court... the one where Nadal can't follow him. If he wins Australian open, US open and some hard court masters series and maybe ATP world tour final in London i'm certain that he well retain the 1st place... but unfortunatly i doubt he will. I hope he will surprise me :)
After winnning Aus open "I wasn't able to enjoy this win too much after seeing Federer in the state that he was in after losing the final. It leaves you a little shaken," Nadal said. Roger please fuck off for good so nadal can enjoy winning the slams that you once did . You should apologies to 'king rafa' for the little princess routine and ideally retire knowing you did ok, but never achieved greatness since bunnys cant claim that title whereas nadal, sampras, borg and laver can.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I hate this fucktwat with a passion. He projects this false image of how humble he is, but the truth is nadal is the most humble and will beat the shit out of him again, and again and again. oh, and AGAIN! Even andy murray is getting into the federer bashing! lol. Roger federer, the greatest player in the world? Dont think so. Far from it , The greatest bunny, choker and cry baby in the history of the sport? Yes. Spot on.
cric321, you are just a angry and bitter dude, just because you don't cheer for Federer, it doesn't mean you have to get angry because of his greatness. Get over yourself, go outside, get a life.
hey man why are you writing this stupid coments in a royal zone? are you so angry and constipated because Roger is better player? that he beat Nadal the last time they met when your spanish molly was "better" and the favorite and federer was going to the exit? that Fed is 28 and hasn't being injured and Nadal isn't 25 and has his knees fucked? I know Nadal has won more against Federer but that doesn´t make him better. Federer is more consistant than him and his the best player ever!!
2. If you want to go to Nadal's video zone and say whatever you want with people of your kind go and do it no one will stop you. Just please dont bother us, we are Fed fans and we dont want to hear someone like you saying this things about our hero!!!
and 3. Dont say anything about my lovely mother or something like that. it shows how primitve you are, that you dont have no brain and you lack of debate hability. not to mention that you have nothing better to do.
Poor mirka. She will soon have 2 cry babies at home to deal with! lol i feel sorry for the kid, (s)he will inherit poor genes. A father who has no backbone whatsover and cries like a pussy whenever the going gets tough (i.e nadal batters the shit ou of him REPEATEDLY) and a mother who has fatness disease (ok, that was unneccessary)... but true. GO RAFAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! !!!!!!!
he truly deserves greatness, what a beautiful person! he recognized his weaknesses and improved it and now look at him, possibly the greatest of all time!
That super perfect forehand let him down in the Australian Open semi final!
Fadibest100 2 weeks ago
I don't want this movie to end . . . . .
williamstdog9 1 month ago
thevidboy83 can you please upload this documentary mentioning the year 2008 for federer . in all videos it is upto US open 2007 and the other part which is named "Roger federer - spirit of a champion the greatest" mentions about from Aus open 2009 to Aus open 2010. But here in india on star sports i have seen the extended form of this documentary mentioning Wimbledon 2008, olympics 2008 and of course US open 2008... So try finding that part plssssssss
satishsatishiyer 8 months ago
@5:48 Roger girly scream
Maximagq 1 year ago
BEST BEST BEST TENNIS PLAYER EVER
gingashel 1 year ago
BEST BEST BEST TENNIS PLAYER EVER
gingashel 1 year ago
lol if federer wants to have at least 10 wimbledon tittles,tell ATP to change back to the 1980's grass
KaminariKatta 1 year ago
Roger is true class. Love Roger
federerbestclass 1 year ago
He plays who's in front of him, simple as that. And let's not revise history here, aside from not reaching nearly as many Major finals as Roger, Pete wasn't exactly winning those titles having to square off against Agassi, Becker (who was readying retirement at the time of Pete's ascent) or any other "all-time" great. Yet he won them fair and square. As has Mr. Federer. Enough said.
rwfan 2 years ago
Edit to add: Pete wasn't facing off against those players, on a constant basis during Grand Slam events. As someone who followed pro tennis since the 1980s, Pete got much of the same "domination" flak as Fed. Though the key difference from my perspective appears to be nationality.
rwfan 2 years ago
Were Fed an American (or even Brit for that matter), the amount of coverage would be insufferable. Though I kinda prefer it as is. Allows his racket to do the talking. Leaving his detractors scrambling for yet another way to move the goal post. lol
rwfan 2 years ago
Wouldn't Nadal have to first start reaching all GS finals as consistently as Fed to have this debate. Also Agassi and Sampras were about the same age, whereas Nadal is 5 years younger than Fed. I think Fed's GS semi and finals records speak for themselves.
rwfan 2 years ago
for right now he's the greastest of all time.
SuperIndianKid 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
what you comment is nonsense and is just fiction.
sampras GS finals is 14-4 wins
federer GS finals 16-7 wins
sampras cursed agassi during their battle of GS 4-1
nadal cursed federer during their battle of GS 5-1
during sampras 12 years initial record breaking 17 GS champions
during federer 16 GS record breaking only 4 other GS champion
statistically sampras is the best ever
one eye king federer is just greatest by numbers in the world of blind
rangeboyry 2 years ago
The question in my mind is not whether Federer is the greatest player ever... but by how much distance he is the greatest... I think by the time he is done Roger will make sure that he is the greatest player ever... atleast by a mile than his closest rivals Rod Laver... Pete Sampras... and Bjorn Borg...I cannot help negating those poor people who question his greatness because they themselves know that they are wrong.. The point is HE IS THE BEST... like him or not...
satishsatishiyer 2 years ago 2
federer is unbeatable..hes really good
v0rgelx 2 years ago 5
yeah right he's unbeatable
but just trashed by Nadal (claycourt player) even on wimbeldon
next GS championship he will compete against my grandfather instead of wasting time up against current loser players
rangeboyry 2 years ago
@rangeboyry know ur tennis boy,the grass court at wimbledon is slower than usopen and aussieopen,go search it up.
KaminariKatta 1 year ago
if he is...
why does nadal(only second talent in game) beat him on GS finals 5 times in row one after another ?
rangeboyry 2 years ago
mono!!!!
pepe00iz 2 years ago
Comment removed
wwechampion2234 2 years ago
Comment removed
wwechampion2234 2 years ago
He's perfect.
xinnianhao 2 years ago 4
perfect loser against Nadal on every single match on every single surface
rangeboyry 2 years ago
@rangeboyry Federer leads on grass courts and hard courts (more than one surface)THAT CLAY CHICKEN IS JUST A CLAY CHICKEN
Fadibest100 1 month ago
hey fordie he is not the king but he is the emperor..the greatest the game had ever seen
sonic837 2 years ago
he's one eye king in the world of blind
cant even beat Nadal, his only competition beside bunch of loser players around
go watch sampras, becker, krajicek, kafelnikof, kuerten, agassi, rafter, jim and so on...
maybe you get a better idea what the man tennis was instead GS tarining matches of today
rangeboyry 2 years ago
u fucking fed hater, u r saying rafa beat roger in wimbeldon 2008 and aus 09...ok,so what? after all fed was under so much pressure to break borg,s record in wimbeldon and tie sampras record in aus 09..but still,he did not lose easily but make rafa run like a deer for 4:30 hours in both games...but roger took jus 2:30 hrs in wimbeldon 2006 and 3;30 hrs during wim 2007.. so,give some other convincing reasons, u cocksucking son of a bitch
ab501lara 2 years ago
he's a loser against Nadal one after another
like your mama in bed with me one after another.
would you need more convincing sweety ?
than ask your fatal mamy about Nadal
all the best with loser federer
sampras is the king
rangeboyry 2 years ago
no,u dickhead..yours is not convincing reply..it seems u dont understand english. your reply is totally irrelavant to my question. i never said anything about sampras,u asshole...better have ur head examined or have ur mama for sex all the time or get ur dick shaved off
ab501lara 2 years ago
Comment removed
sonic837 2 years ago
people stop hateing Nadal and saying he is terrible and what has he done. i tell you what hes done at 18 he won the french open and the next 3 years after that he won it easily each year and won a AUS Open at 22 also competeing in one of the greatest finals in history and winning. both Roger and Rafa are excellent players and all of us should feel privlidged to be in the era of Rafa vs Roger. Roger would also not be pleased at fans like you Nadal haters because he respects Nadal very much
jmacnz 2 years ago 6
I agree to this. I am great Roger fan but Nadal is Nadal. We are so blessed with the existence of these players in our era. Their stories will be a stuff of legend that can be told to our grandchildren, long after this two gentlement will leave the circuit. Instead of bad words, lets celebrate their achievements.
rlparcia 2 years ago 5
@jmacnz we're not hating on him,we're juz pissed that nadal fans come to a fed video juz to criticize abt him.
KaminariKatta 1 year ago
Federer In 2008 was ill many palkyers beat him so easy but federer in great form is dangerous
enialis77210 2 years ago 2
the king..
FordieMUFC 2 years ago 9
This has been flagged as spam show
THis SWISS TURD IS NOthing COMPARED TO THE GREAT NADAL! COME BACK SON KING RAFA! DESTROY HIM NADAL
TheSwisspussy 2 years ago
oh yeah, nothing compared to him.
a man that has held the no.1 position for 237 consecutive weeks, has won 15 grand slams. and still has much more time to go in tennis. nothing compared to nadal that has won what? 6 grand slams?
FordieMUFC 2 years ago 3
and 4 of them are on clay....so sad....lol nadal is probably the greatest clay player ever. but compare to roger federer, what nadal has achieved is nothing near as great....
andy316800 2 years ago 2
You are talking out of your ass, especially since even Nadal talks nicely about Federer. I sure Nadal doesn't even want to have fans like you, so just shut up and do a favor to everyone.
onixya1969 2 years ago 3
Comment removed
sonic837 2 years ago
one eye king in the world of blind
there was ever one king in real tennis
PETE SAMPRAS
real GS match competitions
not training matches like federer
rangeboyry 2 years ago
federer is the greatest players ever, but ofc we cant compare him with Borg or macenroe cus they sued some old bad rackets nothing compared with the new ones. anywheys The only one who can Stop federer in a Grand slam I Rafael nadal and he´s the only one who have done it aswell.
DonChilenito 2 years ago
Federer is 27 years old. With his excellent physical condition he may reach a playing age similar to Agassi, 35 years. Having said so, he has aproximately 8 more years to play. That means approximately 32 more grand slams. He may not win them all and he may drop his game, but I believe that he ought to win between 20-25 grand slams by the time he retires. Additionaly I believe he can actually improve his game now that he's got rolandgarros off his shoulders, as well as beating Sampras's record.
theinside227712699 2 years ago 5
Great point made... I think Fedex will win 22 slams... and Tiger woods will end up with 25-26 majors... this is just my opinion... because Fedex will play another 6-7 years and tiger woods will play for atleast 20-25 years... so ITS ADVANTAGE TIGER WOODS..
satishsatishiyer 2 years ago
enough is enough ROGER is the best tennis player the end.
flord777 2 years ago 5
I love this video and thanks for sharing it. Go Roger for 15th Grand Slam title. 2009 is your year. You deserve it. Looking forward on wimbledon final. Just focus on your game, stay calm, don't underestimate your opponent. God Bless...
flawlessbeauty888 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Roger better play like this against Murry because Murry's chances are too great. Murry just won in Queens on grace before coming into Wimbledon so his confidence is up, plus he has a 6-2 record against Roger, plus Murry will hav the entire COUNTRY routing for him. Roger doesn't have a chance against Andy Murry.
Congrats, Murry
Sorry, Roger
I love Roger and want him to win, but it's time to face up to reality this year.
FrenchLanguage 2 years ago
You´re a stupid... granted, Murray leads Federer in head-to-head matches, 6 - 2... but did you know that both of Federer´s victories against Murray have come in finals? And that both have a beatdown for Murray (Bankog 2005, not to mention the way he was crushed by Federer in last year´s U.S. Open final)? Besides, they´d play on a grass court, where Federer rules... so, if I were you, I´d seriously doubt about Murray´s ''great chances'' against Federer in a possible Wimbledon final...
mariomarcano 2 years ago
You should think before you talk...
mariomarcano 2 years ago
so, roger wins his 15 slam at wimbledon. No surprise. So who thinks this years wim was entertaining? Are people getting bored of watching one player dominate or do majority of people marvel at rogers genius? Why cant nobody except nadal challenge roger on grass. Can roger win 10 wimbledons! if so, do you think he should be given the real trophy to keep if he win s10!
MrTk014 2 years ago
I´m a Federer fan, but hey, no, nobody can win 10 Wimbledons... that´ll be like winning it for an entire decade... however, he can win 8! All of this, everyone should know that Federer was up 7 - 6, 0 - 30, in last year´s Wimbledon final (which means that he was two points away from victory)... So, he could have had 1 more Wimbledon trophy... So, whichever is his tally in Wimbledon at the end of his career, we´d have to remember that he let Nadal rob him 1...
mariomarcano 2 years ago
Comment removed
theinside227712699 2 years ago
C mon.. Rog wimby is yours for sure...and i dnt see any real threat for you in US open.. Damn had u won Aus open you would have completed a Calendar slam... no problem 2010 Aus open is of yours for sure...
satishsatishiyer 2 years ago
Andreev was a real threat to Federer in last year´s U.S. Open eightfinals... of course, Roger´ll win the 2010 Australian Open, and erase that stupid memory of sobbing... I know he won´t retire until he erases that...
mariomarcano 2 years ago
cric321, even Nadal respect Roger. so u as a fan of Nadal, totally adores and respect Nadal, y dont u do the same like your role model?
syimato 2 years ago
alguien lo podria poner traducido al español...
mepartocontigo10 2 years ago 2
Does somebody know how the song is called that starts at 0:11?
sVenRRneVs 2 years ago
Amazing player. Most naturally gifted the game has seen. I think he may end up with 19 slams if he is motivated and gets over the nadal complex. I am sure he will.
MrTk014 2 years ago
I reckon that Federer´ll wind up with 18 grand slams...
mariomarcano 2 years ago
His style,grace and brilliance is unmatchable.
mroshanali 2 years ago 11
this is the most emotional and the most inspiring phenomenon ever
vinayvenkateshprasad 2 years ago 6
ROGER ROGER ROGER !!! GO
gorogerfederer 2 years ago 7
try to beat your only competition Nadal
Go Roger
maybe in your dreams
rangeboyry 2 years ago
gotta love Rafa he's so humble even though he has beaten roger many times^_^
tolendoi123 2 years ago 6
Simply the greatest tennis player in history...
Neo351 3 years ago 20
after Pete Sampras
rangeboyry 2 years ago
Very nice
TaylorKristich 3 years ago 7
please win US Open Roger, show us you're still the man.
WikipediaRules 3 years ago 12
he done it
abbyo7baby 3 years ago 9
hopefully he will retain the us open and get back to his best ahead of the next season
eddieirvtheswerve 3 years ago 9
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Nadal will do roger in the shitter again, again and again until roger cries so loud they will hear him in switzerland. Roger, you are finished. Pack your bags, fuck off back to switerland, turn the TV on and watch how a "true champion" plays.
cric321 3 years ago
nadal = 5 grandslams
roger = 13
abbyo7baby 3 years ago 20
Nadal = 22 years (Pro since 2001)
Federer = 27 years (Pro since 1998)
18agosto2mil8 3 years ago
GS match up results Nadal vs Roger ?
any comment please ?
sampras was 5-1 against agassi and also up against all other hall of fame champions
ring the bell ?
rangeboyry 2 years ago
@abbyo7baby 16 to be exact!!!
sjmadzzz14 1 year ago
excellent video, thanks so much for uploading. i really hope roger will get out of his recent slump.
fibe99999 3 years ago 10
This has been flagged as spam show
Roger federer - R.I.P 2003-2007
I dont care how many slams he won, he is without any determination or backbone. He is a pathetic role model for youngster. Nadal is the perfect champion unlike his idiotic predeccessor. He fights to the bone, plays every point like his life depends on it. These are the characteristics of a champion. Roger, keep playing sub standard doubles tennis with that other pathetic swizz friend of yours if that helps you feel like a champion. fucking loser.
cric321 3 years ago
he has done that.. he has won the US open and i am very sure that he will win All 4 grand slams of 2009.. it is important to note that French open 2009 will be his 15 grand slam.. :-)
satishsatishiyer 3 years ago 7
agree mucho! And then by the end of 2009 he will be celebrating his 17th Slam!
cric321: are you unable to watch the video because otherwise you must be blind and deaf at the same time to not be able to see the true and humble champion of Roger Federer
itsisi 3 years ago 5
Why do you think he will??? I personally consider Rafael Nadal invincible on clay and very good at grass as well. If Federer is looking to be number 1 again he'll have to do well on hard court... the one where Nadal can't follow him. If he wins Australian open, US open and some hard court masters series and maybe ATP world tour final in London i'm certain that he well retain the 1st place... but unfortunatly i doubt he will. I hope he will surprise me :)
60Swend60 3 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
After winnning Aus open "I wasn't able to enjoy this win too much after seeing Federer in the state that he was in after losing the final. It leaves you a little shaken," Nadal said. Roger please fuck off for good so nadal can enjoy winning the slams that you once did . You should apologies to 'king rafa' for the little princess routine and ideally retire knowing you did ok, but never achieved greatness since bunnys cant claim that title whereas nadal, sampras, borg and laver can.
cric321 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I hate this fucktwat with a passion. He projects this false image of how humble he is, but the truth is nadal is the most humble and will beat the shit out of him again, and again and again. oh, and AGAIN! Even andy murray is getting into the federer bashing! lol. Roger federer, the greatest player in the world? Dont think so. Far from it , The greatest bunny, choker and cry baby in the history of the sport? Yes. Spot on.
cric321 2 years ago
cric321, you are just a angry and bitter dude, just because you don't cheer for Federer, it doesn't mean you have to get angry because of his greatness. Get over yourself, go outside, get a life.
onixya1969 2 years ago 5
just 5 words:
He won the FRENCH OPEN!!!!!!!!!!
and another thing:
he beat nadal in madrid!!!!!!!!
so keep cool buddy
pepe00iz 2 years ago 4
trashed by Nadal by 82% average
his single super talent competitor in the arena
cool right ?
rangeboyry 2 years ago
hey man why are you writing this stupid coments in a royal zone? are you so angry and constipated because Roger is better player? that he beat Nadal the last time they met when your spanish molly was "better" and the favorite and federer was going to the exit? that Fed is 28 and hasn't being injured and Nadal isn't 25 and has his knees fucked? I know Nadal has won more against Federer but that doesn´t make him better. Federer is more consistant than him and his the best player ever!!
pepe00iz 2 years ago
And in games Nadal has had more trouble in beating federer than roger beating nadal also you have to count the mononucleosis.
and who has more GS??? ROGER!!!!
Also i have 3 things to say:
1. stop saying Nadal has beaten roger multiple times please It´s annoying. Thank you.
pepe00iz 2 years ago
2. If you want to go to Nadal's video zone and say whatever you want with people of your kind go and do it no one will stop you. Just please dont bother us, we are Fed fans and we dont want to hear someone like you saying this things about our hero!!!
and 3. Dont say anything about my lovely mother or something like that. it shows how primitve you are, that you dont have no brain and you lack of debate hability. not to mention that you have nothing better to do.
Long live Roger!!!!
pepe00iz 2 years ago 2
@pepe00iz It's sad how all the tennis fan don't respect each other!
Federer fan and Nadal fan are just like enemy
Jiexiao44 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
Poor mirka. She will soon have 2 cry babies at home to deal with! lol i feel sorry for the kid, (s)he will inherit poor genes. A father who has no backbone whatsover and cries like a pussy whenever the going gets tough (i.e nadal batters the shit ou of him REPEATEDLY) and a mother who has fatness disease (ok, that was unneccessary)... but true. GO RAFAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA! !!!!!!!
cric321 2 years ago
He is the spitting image of his father.
kdorg79 3 years ago
he looks a bit like his mum too
diehardFedfan 3 years ago 3
to be honest...no1 or not he is still our no1
We may.....and i stress may have to come to grips with a roger federer who is not no1.
I hope not
YourHeroesExplained 3 years ago
he truly deserves greatness, what a beautiful person! he recognized his weaknesses and improved it and now look at him, possibly the greatest of all time!
k4z4o2 3 years ago 6
Roger Federer the best player ever!!!
EzzeBezz16 3 years ago 10
after Sampras
rangeboyry 2 years ago
inspiration..i knw roger will do everything to come back to his top form..
diehardFedfan 3 years ago 9
damn..he dindt win..but next year he will win!!! go fedex!!! you are the king and the no. 1!!! of all the time
DarkSiteOfAngel 3 years ago 8
thanks for this video, very inspiring...
kingsuey 3 years ago 3
Can i get the who The Spirit & Making of a Champion video anywhere?
twinsrox321 3 years ago
Watching Wimbledon final. Just hoping he's goin to win! He's a so elegant and great champion!
FLO26FEV05 3 years ago 2
Thank you! I was waiting for this!
souslesun 3 years ago
THANK YOU! I wanted to see it so much, and it's finally here on youtube :D almost unbelievable :D Roger rocks (not only with his air-guitar :D)!
chloewhite 3 years ago 2