Added: 4 years ago
From: morsec0de
Views: 53,654
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (2,918)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • What about the Sumerian creation story?

  • If we do that, we change it from christmas break to yule break.

  • @snipesnrifles Hey -- as long as we get a break, who's going to quibble about semantics?

  • @markedwardindc I agree

  • You know we have a class that does just this in my H.S. It is called World Religions but sadly, it is merely an elective! T.T But i elect to take it to better my understanding of religion on planet earth!

  • They should teach the Egypt creation story first, that way, the kids will know it's all pretty much a crank-yank.

  • Umm, you just taught us most of the creation myths in 3:36 seconds...and you want a whole class to teach this crap for a whole school year. There are places that teach this bullsh*t....they are called CHURCHES..keep that nonsense out of the PUBLIC school....unless you let real scientist teach real science in your churches.

  • @dojoma630 That was his point.

  • @dojoma630 Did you just say "Most"?.... It's estimated that there has been a total of around 63,000 systems of belief, and around one hundred million individual sects.. This video isn't even a grain of salt compared to the total religions bro.

  • @shadowsk8ersmiley ok..youre right, the guy in the video didnt explain most..But that 63,000 can be narrowed down greatly due to the fact that some of them have the same or similar creation story. ALL religious creation stories, without any evidence whatsoever, are nothing but guesses and myths...yes i said ALL...they have NO educational value. So we need to keep that shit out of our public schools.

  • Make sure we don't forget Pastafarianism, which states that the Flying Spaghetti Monster created the entire universe after a night of heavy drinking.

  • sure and next everyone can decide on his own what 4+4 is

  • .........

  • I think that children should be able to write their own creation myths.

  • ...infinitely better than all that he has made. Esp. since all that he has made has been corrupted by sin

  • The knowledge of when to produce stem cells and how many and the forms to mold them requires a former that is outside of the process. Do you have any idea just how complex is the nervous system? The circular system? Muscles and ligaments?

    God does it all using the tool of DNA.I think that he uses tools bc he wants to catch the evil in the unbelief that comes from rejecting the creator in favor of the creation(self) and food and sex. All things were made by God and it is logical that God is..

  • @j919or

    Ehhhh..

    Which 'god' with a big tool do you refer to ?

  • Nah, just teach intelligent design not the specific writings of various religions. Actually teaching that we just arent sure is much better than brainwashing children to believe that evolution is a scienntific fact when it is neither science nor a fact.

  • @j919or

    Your comment proves you don't understand science at all.

    Evolution IS a reality.

    facts + laws = Theories.

    Theories are THE highest thing in science.

    Evolution supports ALL observations and has NO contradictions...that is the deffinition of a Scientific Theory

  • @whiteowl1415 ""Evolution IS a reality.""

    Calling it a reality doesnt make it a reality. Evolution doesnt deal with facts but assumptions. In radiometric dating rates and conditions are assumed , while their variance would greatly alter the results. No facts. Laws of entropy predict decreases in order not decreases, for raw energy reduces complexity unless harnessed by a machine with information.

  • @j919or

    "Laws of entropy predict decreases in order not decreases" - You left out the "In an closed system part" which the earth is not.

    You need an education badly

  • ...perhaps in a mythology class?

  • but what about the religion I made up, why won't they teach my religion it not fair.

  • @daveforfun22

    I know the feeling...I came up with one based completely on the idea that the universe is held together with Duct Tape =(

  • @shirlley47 You're silly Atheism is a religion. Religion doesn't mean belief in god it means a group of people that believe in one thing the same way, hence how we make cults. You Atheist believe in your science so much which is always proven wrong and is full of lies and horrible theories. Scientist claimed there's no cure for Cancer for over a half a century just for me to do a little research and find out that Antineoplastons are the cure. your belief is within your own intellect.

  • @anonymousnamealso Creationists claim that there was no death in the world before Eve ate the apple. What anatomy did the original created animals e.g scorpions, crocodile, cheetah, lion, killer whale, spider,have? The present anatomy of carnivores is intrinsically adapted to catching, killing & eating other animals. Did satan wave a magic wand and change the animals overnight from herbivores into the present day form? Will lions & kestrels go to hell for eating other animals?

  • @zytigon funny thing about animals or living creatures. they adapt easily. haven't you ever seen a pic of a lion kissing a sheep. or a dog licking a cat? Another funny thing is magic. and the fact that some people think everything must have a soul in order to pay for a sin.(death being the wage of sin).

  • @zytigon ""the animals overnight from herbivores into the present day form?""

    God has already programmed adaption into animals

  • @j919or The genealogies of the Bible imply that life on earth started 4000BCE. If you try to put back the start of humanity to 200,000 BCE like science would suggest then the genealogies are a meaningless fraction. There is no evidence for a global flood at the 2300BCE date the Bible talks of. For carnivores to evolve from herbivores would need millions of years. Anyway look at zooplankton eating each other. Animal eat animal has been a feature since primordial soup.

  • @zytigon If we started humanity 200,000 years ago there would be population in the trillions .

    Youre confusing evolution over long periods of time via mutations with adaptation from information already present in the DNA.

  • @j919or

    "If we started humanity 200,000 years ago there would be population in the trillions" - Wrong again as you fail to take into acount modern medicine and nutrition for population growth. Human population hardly grew at all preAgricultural development and the RATE of groth increase exponentialy with poulation, not at a standard amount.

    Mutation in DNA are the cause of Evolution. Thousands of tiny changes eventualy add up to big changes

  • @whiteowl1415 ""Thousands of tiny changes eventualy add up to big changes""

    And a mutation is a negative change. There are some rare cases that a negative change is beneficial. But multiple negative dont produce a positive or upward change in the organism. Dream on, god-haters!

  • @j919or

    The vast majority of mutations are actualy neutral, containing neither benificial nor detremental effects.

    Of the ones remaining, detrimental ones weed out while benificial continue on (that is what natural selection means)

    PreIceage man had not developed to the point of agicultire, post iceage it began fairly quickly, with ability improving over time.

    "population growth and agriculture" Google it, choose images and select any of the graphs you like on population development.

  • @whiteowl1415 ""mutations are actualy neutral,""

    They always decrease information. Prove me wrong. Do mutations ever increase information? And if so give an example.

  • @j919or

    Incertion mutations = More DNA, More imp[ortantly tho, the ammount of DNA isn't a driving factor behind evolution.

    Besides, its a misconception taht more DNA = more complex. A single celled Amoeba contains WAY more DNA than we do. Evolution indicates that things become better adapted, not that they contain more information.

  • @whiteowl1415 I got news for ya. DNA doesnt form the organism. God does. DNA is inside the cell and no way would be able to form a complex organism like from embryo to fetus to baby to adult. God is infinite and this is no problem for him. Keep warring against God, I just hope surrender before its too late.

  • @j919or

    So nice to know that DNA dosn't form the organism.

    Now all those people paying childsuport due to DNA tests are off the hook. Oh and people with Down's Syndrome don't reall have it, because the alteration in thier DNA dosn't Form them,

    Ogranisms are formed through DNA replication, and are formed based on the DNA construstion.

    Everything in reality supports evolution, your being willfuly ignorant.

  • @whiteowl1415 Think for a second. DNA is inside of the cell. Nothing can be built from inside the parts. There must be a former on the outside of the parts to bring order to the parts.

    Yes, you have no evidence of this infinite Former bc you are blinded by sin.

  • @j919or

    "DNA is inside of the cell. Nothing can be built from inside the parts." - Poof a magical being did it makes much more sense? Learn about cell division, Mitosis, and DNA replication. I understand now the issue...you don't understand how it works, so you attribute it to the devine, dosn't change that it does work, and is been used for medicine

    "you have no evidence of this infinite Former bc you are blinded by sin." - Evidence dosn't work like that. Either its there or it isn't

  • @whiteowl1415 Im not saying that DNA cant replicate. And you know it. Show how cells form complex shapes structures and machines like the human brain merely from information inside of the cells, the cell is a machine only to produce other machines like it. It cannot form an organism from within.

  • @j919or

    Im not a friggin BioChemist, but a vauge description is....

    The DNA repclicated and provides instructions for cell division. Stemsells follow these instructions in a manner that alters theier function into various types of cells..This is why people push for Stem cell research. These cells form colonies and the colonies function together as organs

    As the cell divides it takes part of ther origional material, it builds from there by consuming nutreints.

    Best I can offer as a layman

  • @j919or

    Praise be to the All Might Be Magic Man.

    And may the good lard shave your hole.

  • @whiteowl1415 ""preAgricultural development ""

    You dummies think that it would take man millions of years to learn agriculture or even 100s of years? BTW Id like to see some evidence of your wild contentions.

  • @3vi14n931 Not true Atheism have faith/belief that there way is the only way. They think that their small minds are able to figure out things that have taken us centuries to figure out with a collective mind. that's egotistical to the max.

  • Hindu sounds pretty good.

  • @therealwhitething

    Individuals vary.

    Quite little in thier behavior surprised me.

    So yes, there are likely, especialy in the teen crowds where image is so important, people who claim Atheism without thought.

  • @therealwhitething "I never said he was a good debater" - (shrug( I never said he wasn't intellegent)

    "Why can't someone just say " I don't believe in god"- Thats what happens, then they get lumped in as Non-beleivers and forced, despite different veiws of nonBelief, to work together to resist a united push of religion on them.

    Atheist has become a synonym for nonbeleiver...when I say I am an Atheist I'm not annoucing a membership, I'm just saying I don't beleive for whatever reasons.

  • @therealwhitething

    "It's not about blind following, it's about a constant search" - UNtil your search takes you somewhere your church dosnt agree with

    "It's a label for a group, which develops a herd mentality" - Actualy, it a label the Religous put on nonBelievers to lump them together. Atheists don't have a hard mentality. We don't sit around once a week getting our stories straight.

    "Richard Dawkins knows more than you" - Maybe, but it dosn't mean he a good speaker or debater

  • @therealwhitething

    "Why ebven worry about it" - Because years from now I would rather not have the Doctor treating me be under the impression that Myths are as valid as science.

    "Was watching a Richard Dawkins" - Really don't like that guy. He isn't very good at debate or thinking on his feet and just feuls the misconception that Atheist are arogant pricks

    "They are just trying to fit in a group as much as christians, with non belief as there god - No Atheism isn't about blind following

  • @therealwhitething ou should watch the video...its sarcasm, he is pointing out how insane it is to teach creationism.

    How it is impssible to teach ALL the types is being used to make the point that this is purely a Christian agenda and full of crap.

  • i agree this teaches children all the theories and then they may notice "hold on, how does that work?"

  • Isnt your idea just religous education?

  • @JasonArgonaut3912

    Not MY video, Im just sticking up for it, but glad to see it being passed along.

    Carries a good message in my opinion

  • Look the catwgory is(dam dam dam drumroll) Comedy...

  • i also believe we need to teach alternative versions of christianity and other religions in school, so that the students can decide wich version are the only true version. The most interesting versions would be Islamic version of Christianity, versus Christian version of Islam.

  • this is satire right?

  • The creator is a lie xD retarded people belives in a god

  • @JasonArgonaut3912

    See previous post but drop option "c" and "e", you proved me wrong on those counts.

    It takes maturity to stop and review a situation before continuing and is the means to gain knowledge thus eliminating ignorance.

    (Tips the proverbial hat)

    P.S. If you ever find that Golden Fleece, cut me in on a share of it =)

  • @JasonArgonaut3912

    "We live in a new world with no time for such courtesies."

    a) It takes no more nor less time

    b) 1st Amendment does not protect the right to swear publicly....It is listed in a similar catagory of why you can't display pornography publicly.

    c) I never said you were wrong for using it, crude, immature, ignorant but not wrong

    d) You have time to post here, world isn't moving any faster than before

    e) Still avoiding the actual thread subject I see

  • Bottom line: Creationism is NOT science.

    Science observes evidence and poses theories based on that in the effort to reach the truth.

    Creationism comes up with a "truth" then finds ways to make evidence fit it.

    The "proof" of creationism revolves around the NONevidence. Anything science dosn't have an answer for yet, becomes "proof"

    Creationism is like trying to guess the picture on a jigsaw puzzle by looking at the holes that don't have anything yet, while science keeps adding peices.

  • @JasonArgonaut3912

    "To be practical - wouldn't ALL insults be word choices?" I see my sentence wasn't clearly stated, let me rephrase it to the origional intention..

    Have you lost any logical debate material to the point that you can only attack my choice of words rather than the actual issue?

    And no 1st Amendment was ruled specifically NOT to protect vugarity.

    I never attacked your using it. Indeed you simply insulted my choice NOT to.

    Sad when manners become the target of ridicule

  • so basically you want a religion class on the different cultures belief systems, i get it its almost like a culture class, but you gotta remember faith isnt fact, nor should it be taught as fact, its not science, and shouldnt be taught in a science class

  • @JasonArgonaut3912 Your russian and German Sucks 

  • @therealwhitething did you even watch the video? if not, youre a moron.

    did you watch the video and get poed? if so, youre a moron.

    i think thats all bases covered.

    OP, good satire. youre not fat.

  • @volound Not fat, for an American.

  • Creationism should only be taught in abnormal psychology classes, NOT in any science classroom.

  • @DocReasonable Neither creationism nor evolution should be taught in science class for neither are science...possibly history class.

  • @JasonArgonaut3912

    As a school teacher I try to avoid vulgarity.

    Yes, I said "Dumbass" in the other post, I didn't say I don't swear, only that I try to avoid it.

    Have you lost any logical debate material that you must resort to word choice to insult?

  • @JasonArgonaut3912

    Heck..if you had even thought to watch the video on the page you posted a comment to you would understood it...its the same thing the guy above is saying

  • @JasonArgonaut3912

    Actually...Translations 1,2 I was fine with...

    In context with the satement "WHICH creationism?" in the previous post, context should have clued you in.

    Unlike you I have not become uncivil at anypoint during this by making crude insults, regardless of language.

    I do now regret the politeness I extended with "Sorry if that overwhelmed" but I had thought it better than

    "Hey dumbass read the post a little more carefully"

  • @JasonArgonaut3912

    Sorry if that overwhelmed...I was listing different creation Myths from various cultures to point out that even if we agree to teach Creationism, we then run into the problem of which religion's creationism theory we teach, else we teach them all and spend an entire science semester or more devoted to Mythologies.

  • @JasonArgonaut3912

    Ok....WHICH creationism?

    Yahweh "Let there be light"

    Marduk's slaying of Tiamat

    Odin killing Yamir the Frost Giant

    Re pleasureing himself in th waters

    Or perhaps just the mention it really deserves...."Some people think this was all done by design. If that is your belief, more power to you"

  • In Swedish high school we have this class. It's called Religion.

  • so religious or theological history? As long as we're not offering these beliefs as models to understand the physical universe around us, I support your idea.

  • "creationism" is being taken far out of context here. Most of what he calls "creationism" would be more accurately described as cosmogony, which is different. These topics belong to either philosophy or religion classes.

  • I gave this video a thumbs up and a thumbs down, cuz first, it was funny, second, it was non-sense.

  • @therealwhitething Because my weight matters when considering whether or not I'm correct. And there's this thing called 'parody'. Look it up.

  • we need to teach it to truly understand stupidity, or we can show them this video

  • Amen... If you really support these views please visit youtube channel InGodsDefense ... a new organization dedicated to supporting God's part in our existence.

  • I don't get what the big deal is.. I'm from europe, we have a subject called religion. That's where creationism should be discussed, if the students wish to. Leave it out of the science class.

    I can't believe this is even being discussed in such a 'supposedly' advanced culture as America in the 21st century...

  • Comment removed

  • You know what? most intelligent Christians do not believe in creationism, not even the pope. sooooo why teach it?

  • @rflooker Apparently because there are so many retarded backwater Americans that it is actually an issue for them? I don't really think its an issue in any other 1st world country.

  • Respond to this video... But some schools do teach about diffrent religons.Isn't it called mythology?It's been along time since I was in school but I think it was a part of world history. Not sure so help me out here.

  • @420gma I am a history teacher, and I at least do cover Mesopotamian, Egyptian, Hinduism, Buddhism, Taoism, Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Greek Myth, Norse Myth, Wicca, Shinto and Anamism (off the top of my head)

    Religion is a HUGE part of history and culture, but it certainly isn't science. =)

  • @whiteowl1415 Ah history I love it! One of my favorites.It's good that you do that .A lot of our past historical events were based on a societies beliefs .

  • What a tool.

  • He is using some sort of logical fallacy that I cannot remember at this moment. However, correct me if I am wrong, but Christianity is the only one of the aforementioned religions that has not only biblical, but historical parallels. I see this a lot, people like to forget that things in the Bible actually did happen.

  • @camichael74 Like... giants?

  • @camichael74 I don t think so !

  • @camichael74 Just because the bible references historical events like Qur'an Islam does, or like the Bhagavad Gita does from the Hindu faith.. does not mean its true. Oh wait you thought that Christianity had the only religious book that had actual history in it? I am sorry. But that is very naive. I will also note the foundation of Hinduism predates Judaism by about 3000 years.... possibly 3500 years. Which is before the chronology of the bible says the Earth existed.... interesting hey?

  • @CtheWolfe Thank you, that was all I was asking for was a correction. I actually said, "correct me if I am wrong." Which implies that I may not be right. There is no need to be rude and retort in a sarcastic manner stating that I am "naive." Maybe I didn't know, so what? I said "correct me if I'm wrong" not "rudely correct me if I am wrong." Anyway, yes, I can see how my first comment was not well thought out. I can see how other religious documents that predates Christ's death would have

  • @CtheWolfe historical parallels. I would like to ask what your sources are for your claims. I think it is interesting if it is true, but I would like to see it for myself.

  • @camichael74 The Bhagavad Gita and the Qur'an both make references to actual history.... thats your reference

  • @CtheWolfe Give me solid factual evidence, please. Word of mouth from someone who just insulted me is not enough to sway me in any direction.

  • @camichael74 Are you looking for specific passages that refer to things throughout history? Because if you are actually interested either book has them. If you actually have interest as you claim it should be simple to figure out. You do know that the Qur'an and Islamic faith spawns from Christianity as well yeah? I mean it has references to Moses, Jesus etc in there. As well it has fragments of history intertwined within the stories surrounding Muhammad.

  • You have to be thorough with me, I am a science major, so history is lacking. ;)

  • @camichael74 Can I ask you why you felt it was relevant to say that the bible had historical events in it? I mean regardless if no other religion did, that does not give credibility to the writings. I hope you can see this. I mean Spider-Man has history in it. 2000 years from now I am sure people will realise it is a work of fiction that merely makes reference to history and not mistake the history as cause for belief Peter Parker was real.

  • @CtheWolfe ha, yeah, I think people 2000 years from now might realize that spiderman was a cartoon... there aren't exactly historical parallels in other documents that make it seem to be a reality. Anyway, how do you know that any history is not fiction? How on earth could you know that Robespierre even existed, let alone killed those who opposed the revolution? You can't. The reason being, you were not there. It is by faith and other apparent evidences that lead you to believe it is true.

  • @camichael74 Yes but the truth is the bible conflicts historically with other evidences. In which other evidences agree. From multiple sources. Like the conflict between the information in Matthew 2 and Luke 2. Multiple sources indicate Herod died 10 years prior to the events in Luke 2.... Thus detracting from the historical credibility of the bible itself. Also historical events do not claim miracles as the bible does. This is a little bit more believable when its just men doing human things.

  • @camichael74 It could hardly be considered faith that what we believe to be factual history is indeed true. Faith is in the absence of evidence. That is why religion takes faith, there is no evidence to support it. As a man of science (or one with intent to be) I would hope you can see this. I mean does it take faith to know that Japan is really there without ever actually being there? No. Because evidence would suggest it is. Faith does not play a part in the slightest.

  • @camichael74 I also think you forget that the claims of the bible did not happen. The history referenced some of it happened, and not always the way the bible says it did or when. For instance Matthew 2 and Luke 2 reference actual historical events, however they happened 10 years apart. The bible claims they happened at the time of the birth of Jesus. Thus throwing the birth into question. I mean having bits of history in something does not mean its true. IE Spider-man

  • I find it hilarious that there is a creation myth involvong a maturbating god XD

  • Keep God out of schools unless you want a new darkage

  • @ScientologySucksAss Keep god in the religio class, keep it out of the others.

    America do have religion classes right? ya kno to study the different religions of the world.

  • @Sweddude Almost all Universities do. Some public high schools do to if they are large enough and have the funds to spare. So yes.

  • None of that is real, the only true God is the Flying Spaghetti Monster. Everyone knows that..

    -AtheisticII

  • @AtheisticII I dont think you have to sign your comments. Your username is right there already.

  • 2:08 Jayneism creation.

    That one sounds real! Obviously the one true faith lol!

    Youre last one there isnt the $cientology creationism belief but rather their "incident 3" or whatever name its given(i forget). And its learnt at OTIII. Their creationsim myth is in hubbards book the History of Man and its to do with us evolving out of clams. And that if you ever get a sore jaw its cause you were once a clam.

    Aint seen this in years

    watch?v=3xxhAnautTo

  • @NicosMind Oh i forgot that man was once Piltown man as well lol. And his shitty book was released after it was revealed that Piltown man was a fake ^_^

  • great piece of work........

  • I went to catholic school, creationism was mentioned ONCE, and in freshman religion. Keep the state and church separate

  • @rockstorm96 kudos to your school

  • that would be a History of Religions class, nice

  • @oviatb

    it is summed up more accurately as Theology.

    

  • @Arteanor

    Stupidity seems much more fitting.

  • O-H!!

  • yeah... the only thing i have against creationism is that, well, it doesnt help further biology at all.

  • but why teach it it's a waste of money and time , it his no value and everything you said is not proven by anything it was proven by a guy writing a book thousands or what ever years ago when they had no science and HAD to say It's god,it was god , a god did that/this, God, God, Gods and God.

  • It's called Theology you fat fok!

  • @XlinkK280 His purpose was that of sarcasm, he's trying to say that it's wrong for people to try to put creationism in the classroom under just the judo-christian values(as is trying to be done one The United States of America) and that if creationism were to be taught it would have to be taught as all religions equally. Now I can tell you that this would certainly lead to many more Atheists in the world because it would require the children to think and say "well they can't all be true"

  • looks like god created a fat moron.

  • @Shofoxy looks like god didn't create anything and when you die nothing happens.

  • you made me LOL

  • @onesweetasuzy How is this anything but wild conjecture? You should try atheism, just for a little while, so you can have an informed opinion of it. Atheism is a direct (and the only natural) result of reason, and it actually provides a great deal of us with incredible tranquility and a completely clear moral compass.

    Your only moral compass is the same one I have in my head. You don't follow MOST of the 'moral code' of the Bible, but I'll never condemn you because of my kooky weekend hobby.

  • @onesweetasuzy Religion is a poison of the mind that skews the moral compass and the honestly of a person, promotes hatred, violence and discrimination and is established without evidence and defended vehemently against all evidence to the contrary because of the closed-mindedness of the believers. Atheism is the rejection of the belief in one or more gods. Look, I can be a biased twat too!

  • Or, or we could leave it to the small segment of Mythology that it deserves and those who wish to get their PHD in bullshit can take Theology in college

  • get a life.. lol

  • Creationism has no value for our children. It will not at all help our children be prepared for the future. So no. It should not be taught in schools at all.

  • @onesweetasuzy Are you saying our moral compasses are due to our beliefs? This is obviously not the case and how does it rob you of tranquility ? Religion is the biggest cause of suffering and hate. So please don't spread fallacious rumors.

  • "all gods die when people stop beleving in them" homers odessy

  • "creation myth" exactly that, how can anyone take mythology seriously?

  • @onesweetasuzy Oh now this is funny. I see you are trolling this video too. You bible thumping delusional nutcase.

  • Well, I for one am pretty fascinated by creationism and its history. Unfortunately, complications will emerge in teaching creationism in public school: retaliation by many parents because of intolerance and kids might want to be involved in another belief (parental control); and it is likely to be unconstitutional. Positive side, perhaps this education could stimulate public respect for others people's beliefs. Fortunately, it is available to pursue through college (I assume).

    -Atheist

  • That would be an Kick ass class

  • it should be optional in PUBLIC schools they have catholic schools for a reason:P

  • I met a American scientist in Oslo who said me that there are an enormous amount of stupid people in the so called "bible belt". I now see why. We got all that 'information' in history class and now we believe in evolution even more

  • wat!? much too large of a topic?

    your fucking delusional

  • @IHeadphaze I don't think you watched the entire video, He starts out saying that we should teach creationism , but goes on to elaborate that we should teach ALL kinds of creationism, Hindu, , Nordic, ancient, Egyptian etc. I think it is a good idea, Show that the Christian creation myths are no better or worse, just different that any other creation myth.

  • brainwashed asshole.

  • @onesweetasuzy question: why did God invent the tailbone in humans?

  • @scbrah Good question. The tailbone is left over from when we were smaller had actually a tail - not prehensile, probably more for balance. Along with that information comes a really cool statistic. About 1 in 450,000 human beings is born with a partial or small tail. About 1 - in 3000 doctors has delivered one of those babies, so if you talk to enough doctors you can probably find one. Creepy, huh?

  • @fatouche99 wait. When we were smaller? as in younger? are you saying that you had a tail when you were younger? cuz that answers itself. and no the coccyx is not for balance. Its a remnant structure from when we used to have tails. Also, why did god invent goose bumps when we are cold? Or small un-functioning muscles in our ears? these are both some of the many examples that strongly support evolution.

  • Teach this one - my favorite - orgin by vomit theory: According to the Boshongo people of central Africa, before us there was only darkness, water and the great god Bumba. One day Bumba, in pain from a stomach ache, vomited up the sun. The sun evaporated some of the water, leaving land. Still in discomfort, Bumba vomited up the moon, the stars and then the leopard, the crocodile, the turtle, and finally, humans.

  • Wow, not so fast. I have an elaborate (read: moronic) theory that everything exists by a floating bowl of lasagna (four layered), the arch nemesis of the the flying spaghetti monster. Basically I'm the equivalent of a "Satanist" according to the flying spaghetti monster movement.

  • @onesweetasuzy Your god has you hook line sinker and fishing rod. You just believe what your family told you to believe, it's all you know and you are too far into it to think for yourself. I research things from many sources and believe what makes sense to me. I'm guessing you believe what is written in that contradictory fairy-tale holy book of yours without searching for evidence that any of it is actually true. Christians are the biggest hyprocrits in existence.

    I'll see you in hell.

  • @onesweetasuzy I do not align with any denomination. I am a human being, i do not need gods to think for me and control what I can and can't do. I am in control of my life, I am free. You on the other hand need something to fear, to guide you through life. Your religion threatens you with eternal suffering if you do something against their laws. I can think for myself and choose what to believe, not be forced into it by my parents and brainwashing...

    I already live in hell and so do you.

  • @onesweetasuzy Atleast I don't devote my life to worshipping a non-existent diety. Why don't you go perform a human sacrifice to appease this almighty being to ensure your future?

  • nice vid dude!

  • @onesweetasuzy I reject Jesus, so go shove your bible and lord up your fucking arsehole. Good day.

  • Don't forget the Flying Spaghetti Monster

  • @onesweetasuzy No thanks, if I had to pick, I'd pick Zeus! He's got balls, and I have the same amount of evidence for his existence as you have of zombie hippie. And while I respect gays, I really don't want this guy to love me as no other, that's just creepy for a hetero... Oh, love and kisses, m'kay?

  • @onesweetasuzy Meet you there.

  • @onesweetasuzy As much as you think you're helping me, making the argument "It said so in John 10:10 which is in the bible so therefore it must be true!" isn't going to do anything for me.

  • @onesweetasuzy The origin of the Universe is something we may never understand. No atheist would ever say he knows for a fact there is no god or supreme being, but we lean to the side that there isnt because there is no evidence. On this you are right, though it didnt have to be god that created the universe. I say it was a pink alien named ted and you have no evidence to prove me wrong, but there is no evidence that i am right. Same thing with god. Evolution however explains life on earth

  • @onesweetasuzy Because everyone knows we should be following a book promoting slavery, genocide, and a cosmic jew zombie that was apparently written by an all powerful god who created itself. That's not insanity at all. It's in our hearts, which is an artery .

  • @onesweetasuzy Wait, you mean, I can sleep all the time? In Hell? Wow, that eternal fire doesn't sound so scary after all! Oh wait, you silly persons make up shit all day and cannot agree on ANYTHING...

  • Lolololol. This was funny man. Hats off to you.