To whoever said the m5 was equal to the cl65, go burn your face with sulfuric acid and cut off all your fingers please. You must be too stupid to comprehend anything anyways so I won't waste anymore energy with this, good day asshole.
Straightline maybe. We don't know the mods yet. The M5 should be as quick as the Merc and the GTR should be quicker. The geo on the GTR is far more superior to both allowing for much quicker cornering, exit and entry times but hey in this race, the Merc just about got away with it.
tuskir911 raises a great point. Why were the early Nissan pulling 11's and now most of the GTR's being test in car mags are in the 12's..? Did Nissan marketing screw us? I love the car but that is BS on Nissan's part whether it was unintentional or not.
As with most turbo AWD cars they have great 0-60 times but the extra weight and AWD hamper roll on acceleration as a base 430hp Corvette should be able to run with or maybe even out run a GTR. When comparing all around performance its a different story.
either way this GT-R is pulling like a rape ape. So how much power it was said to make dont matter. Street performance is much more accurate than paper.
well im the biggest gtr nut i could ever be, but i have to admit the gtr doesnt have as much off the roll. You can tell because it slows down on the 1/4 mile. (122mph trap speed)
But with a retune race gas and exhaust i bet 600awhp+ is possible and that would cost maybe 3-4k. and then it would leave everything behind.
"But with a retune race gas and exhaust i bet 600awhp+ is possible and that would cost maybe 3-4k..."
clearly you dont understand cars. your hp rating at the crank is 480...so your whp is probably around 400. there is no way you will gain 50% with a retune and exhaust! sorry ! it might be good for 50whp...but not 200
their proclaimed hp at the crank is way off, people have dynoed their gtr at around 430 to the wheels put about 22-23% power loss that gives you about 524hp to the crank
every engine dynos different because each engine is hand built, all still in the same power range from 480-520. Also each transmission is specifically built for that engine
again, there has not been one which has dynoed to where it would have 480 hp at the flywheel. Will there ever be? I don't know, but so far no, there hasn't
GTR power claims are not "off", the early "test" cars were factory tuned with more boost than regular street cars. Look at the last 1/4 mile times with stock Nissan, it barely manages 12's while early ones did mid 11's. Nissan's marketing campaign is full of shit and some consumers are just to clueless and idiotic to realize this.
again, they weren't early test cars, these are actual production cars in the United States which were pulling 520 hp to the crank. Trust me i've seen enough videos for proof
Mercedes rules !!!
ChaiKun1992 8 months ago
To whoever said the m5 was equal to the cl65, go burn your face with sulfuric acid and cut off all your fingers please. You must be too stupid to comprehend anything anyways so I won't waste anymore energy with this, good day asshole.
AMGkompressor20 1 year ago
oh shoot MB passed the GTR cool
Jkilla342 2 years ago
old cl
The new cl would be much further away;)
waldemar31293 2 years ago
no it wouldn*t... has the same engine and the same power but its heavier... old and new CL65 are almost equal with the speed
Dale33333 2 years ago
@Dale33333
the new centilitre has lower cw worth than the old one
waldemar31293 2 years ago
what do you mean with centilitre?
Dale33333 2 years ago
@Dale33333
oh sorry :D:D i mean CL ^^ i dont know why i writing centilitre??
waldemar31293 2 years ago
great vid, i love the sound of that m5
bkbombers 2 years ago
is this m5 stock?? very fast..
ZTSTST 2 years ago
Cl65 fucked gtr, nice job
xerxislovesmondana 3 years ago
Straightline maybe. We don't know the mods yet. The M5 should be as quick as the Merc and the GTR should be quicker. The geo on the GTR is far more superior to both allowing for much quicker cornering, exit and entry times but hey in this race, the Merc just about got away with it.
CreativeDesignDigi 3 years ago
the 65s really hold their own... is that damn M5 modded? I highly doubt a stock one would keep chase to a 65 and GTR...
droptopsix 3 years ago
According to all test done in Germany the M5 equally fast as the CL65, so I guess this one could very well be stock.
Kire007 3 years ago
tuskir911 raises a great point. Why were the early Nissan pulling 11's and now most of the GTR's being test in car mags are in the 12's..? Did Nissan marketing screw us? I love the car but that is BS on Nissan's part whether it was unintentional or not.
philsC6 3 years ago
wow these guys are clearly russian mafias. no russian can afford these cars in russia without being a mafia member.
someguy2255 3 years ago
my god im more impressed than i was with the gtr! that shit is fast! or maybe i underestimated it :S
Dani01c 3 years ago
As with most turbo AWD cars they have great 0-60 times but the extra weight and AWD hamper roll on acceleration as a base 430hp Corvette should be able to run with or maybe even out run a GTR. When comparing all around performance its a different story.
blkguynlex 3 years ago
either way this GT-R is pulling like a rape ape. So how much power it was said to make dont matter. Street performance is much more accurate than paper.
Dickotine 3 years ago
trakxxs see more tests and you will see that real power of gtr is max 488! don't believe all suckers
badluks 3 years ago
tuskir u are full of shit not nissan! tell me the price of merc bmw and gtr and after that we'll talking about
badluks 3 years ago
DAMN THE MB IS A BEAST
sejodieron 3 years ago 4
@sejodieron put a few corners in there and you'll see which is a beast :)
TetraRage 1 year ago
The GTR has already raped these cars. Save your comments until you view ALL of these guys videos.
07Fuga450GT 3 years ago
Oh I thought that GTR would be much faster. Lame Japanese duck. M5 is the best!
Trithij 3 years ago
everyone knows gtr would rape dese cars only if u know how to drive dis beast
umair10784 3 years ago
i just don't think that a normal factory tune GTR can beat these two monster with average horse power of 500. But yet these 3 cars are in my list!
ryangemini 3 years ago 2
the guy driving the GTR clearly doesn't push his car...
Yashi7 3 years ago
...........
well im the biggest gtr nut i could ever be, but i have to admit the gtr doesnt have as much off the roll. You can tell because it slows down on the 1/4 mile. (122mph trap speed)
But with a retune race gas and exhaust i bet 600awhp+ is possible and that would cost maybe 3-4k. and then it would leave everything behind.
0neTurbo 3 years ago
Maybe the guy didn't set the traction control off and all the stuff.
I am me too a nut of GTR but I realy can't believe this video you know.
I am sure you've seen all of this video :
watch?v=qreQwTeaVWY
watch?v=9BcC30Z38uQ
They all say the GTR beats (almost) everything on the road.
so how is that possible it doesn't beat a CL65 and hardly beats an M5 ? It just makes non sens to me.
Yashi7 3 years ago
Of course it would leave everything behind with a retune race gas and exhaust but I thought it already left everything behind stock.
I am kind of shocked ^^
Yashi7 3 years ago
"But with a retune race gas and exhaust i bet 600awhp+ is possible and that would cost maybe 3-4k..."
clearly you dont understand cars. your hp rating at the crank is 480...so your whp is probably around 400. there is no way you will gain 50% with a retune and exhaust! sorry ! it might be good for 50whp...but not 200
Winjury 3 years ago
their proclaimed hp at the crank is way off, people have dynoed their gtr at around 430 to the wheels put about 22-23% power loss that gives you about 524hp to the crank
trackx07 3 years ago
22 or 23%??! damn! lol. never heard of that good of a transfer of power...and no, its not that high;)
Winjury 3 years ago
well i would have thought the gtr would have had a little better transfer than a sti, which has 25% power loss
trackx07 3 years ago
every engine dynos different because each engine is hand built, all still in the same power range from 480-520. Also each transmission is specifically built for that engine
03altimator 3 years ago
again, there has not been one which has dynoed to where it would have 480 hp at the flywheel. Will there ever be? I don't know, but so far no, there hasn't
trackx07 3 years ago
GTR power claims are not "off", the early "test" cars were factory tuned with more boost than regular street cars. Look at the last 1/4 mile times with stock Nissan, it barely manages 12's while early ones did mid 11's. Nissan's marketing campaign is full of shit and some consumers are just to clueless and idiotic to realize this.
tuskir911 3 years ago
again, they weren't early test cars, these are actual production cars in the United States which were pulling 520 hp to the crank. Trust me i've seen enough videos for proof
trackx07 3 years ago
mannn to cornering GTR own all.......
tubertubie 3 years ago
AWD drive and is still fast from a roll.nice
c7andrei 3 years ago
Not at all.
Altessa.
RWD and variable awd depending on how much traction is needed.
Here (unless the computers detected wheelspin) is probably mostly rwd power. That is why it is fast on the roll less power sapp.
0neTurbo 3 years ago
Cool! add some more videos. like races up to 200-250 km/h. on highways not on avenues!
GeorgeV6v24 3 years ago
the MB is nearly as fast ast the GTR.
alphaq40 3 years ago
better be with +40k price tag and an almost +3L displacement
nvmcxzoiusae 3 years ago