Bill O'Reilly [& Limbaugh] have insulted minorities, gays and promoted hateful, divisive propaganda for decades! Millions of people have died and suffered from the enforcement of the same ideologies that he adamantly promotes for his OWNERS.
So for this narrow-mind, "idiot" [his FAVORITE insult by the way] to favor torture, mind-control and separatism is no surprize. It's all this non-thinking, remotely-controlled "white-power" lover has been taught by his OWNERS! God is only the CREATOR!
Hahahaha..... are you totaly fucking retarded? haha. This cant be a real fucking show you just got to be kidding me? Is this a real show? That bill o reily dude he needs to get of Acid and try to learn how to read and not get his news from some jesus talking to him. Hahaha, man this is pure comedy. To let this shit air you gotta be nuts, who are watching this crap? hahahaha.... cant stop laugh at this, far left......
You guys are colossal idiots. Bush committed aggression against Iraq and had people tortured. He is a war criminal who lied to the American people about WMDs. Clinton should be tried as well for the economic sanctions he levied against iraq.
What lie? Saddam killed tens of thousands of people with chemical weapons, Mahdi Obeidi was hiding parts to a nuclear centrifuge, and every intelligence organization on the western world concluded that Iraq had a WMD program. Sorry dude that dog just dont hunt.
We gave him chemical weapons, we didn't care when he used them on his people, UN weapons inspectors said there were no WMDs and the CIA lied as evidenced by the fact that nothing even close to a WMD has been found. Obeidi wouldn't have been able to restart the nuke program of the 90's because it was too expensive. AND you ignored the facts about torture and aggression. Bush is the American Pinochet and you're a coward and an idiot, not a patriot.
Saddam violated UN resolutions again & again & never once allowed the inspectors to complete their task. There was no way to verify WMD w/o the comforting certainty of hindsight upon which your argument so heavily relies.
I do so adore the left's love affair with this notion of torture. Funny, when our soldiers are caught they are beheaded on TV & your ilk are silent but when we put panties on the head of a mercenary, its torture.
He had them till he was forced to disarm in the 90's in accordance with UN and US demands. If the only way to confirm that a country has WMD's is to invade them then its not a justification for invasion. The UN absolutely completed their task. All the crimes you cite of Saddam's are ultimately OUR fault for putting him in power, letting him stay in power and ignoring him when he committed these crimes.
Forced to disarm? Ha! In 97 Saddam expelled all American inspectors & activated ground-to-air missile systems to deter inspection flights. Then, in 98 he refused access to "presidential sites."
In September 98, the chief U.N. inspector informed the Security Council that Iraq was barring inspections. The council passed a resolution condemning Iraq. Iraq responded by suspending all cooperation with U.N. inspections. Meanwhile he shot at allied aircraft almost daily in the no fly zones.
After the gulf war Iraq was essentialy in ruins and the fiercest economic sanctions ever levied against a country were levied against Iraq. It was impossible for him to take care of his own people much less develop advanced WMD's. Post invasion inspections confirm that he was no closer to a WMD in 2003 then in 1990, regardless of whether he was complying with inspectors prior to the announcement of the invasion he didn't have WMDs, inspectors just before the invasion confirmed this.
The NGIC released a report in 2006 that documented that hundreds of chemical weapons had been located since the invaision. They were not new but it proved that the limited inspections that Saddam allowed did not reveal the supply.
2nd...wrong. The inspectors were not permitted to finish.
You are talking out of both sides of your mouth. 1st you say the inpectors were allowed to do their job then you say well it doesnt matter if they were allowed to finish. It did matter.
Focus. The inspections were not able to be completed during the 90's but just prior to the invasion Saddam panicked and DID allow inspectors in who DID finish their job and demonstrated no WMDs. n January 2003, United Nations weapons inspectors reported that they had found no indication that Iraq possessed nuclear weapons or an active program. The inspectors didn't find the trivial amount that NGIC did because it was an old, decrepit, minuscule supply that in no way justified an invasion.
The inpectors were never allowed access to everthing prior to the invasion.
Demetrius Perricos announced that before, during and after the war, Saddam shipped WMD & medium-range ballistic missiles to countries in Europe & the M. East. Entire factories were dismantled & shipped as scrap metal to Jordan, the Netherlands & Turkey. Perricos showed 2 photos of a missile site near Baghdad, one taken in 05/03 with an active facility, the other in 02/04 that showed it had simply disappeared.
I assure you. The conditions at Abu Garib have greatly improved since the allies took over.
There are 4 crimes that a nation can commit to lose its sovereignty: regular aggressions against neighboring states, violation of the Genocide Convention (of which we are signatories and legally bound to act if violated), violation of the Non-Proliferation treaty, and support or host international terroists or criminals. Saddams government was a multiple offender of each offense.
nobody would have gone after these great Americans. today, however, there is a new breed of far-left, hateful, anti-American cunts for which no proper adjective exists to define their outright stupidity! sad irony that Lincoln set free Black slaves and now Obama just might destroy this great Country
O'Reilly made his points in his Talking Points right before this segment. Would those who want to go after Bush for war crimes have gone after Lincoln, Truman, FDR, Sherman, and Grant as well?
wow, billo is a faggot.
poetwarrior13 1 year ago 2
No Bill Obama won because the people new who to vote for
Rasclot222 1 year ago
What an ugly man, on the outside and the inside.
theliberalparis 2 years ago
We won the war in Iraq? Describe the word "won".
discworld 2 years ago
Bill O'Reilly [& Limbaugh] have insulted minorities, gays and promoted hateful, divisive propaganda for decades! Millions of people have died and suffered from the enforcement of the same ideologies that he adamantly promotes for his OWNERS.
So for this narrow-mind, "idiot" [his FAVORITE insult by the way] to favor torture, mind-control and separatism is no surprize. It's all this non-thinking, remotely-controlled "white-power" lover has been taught by his OWNERS! God is only the CREATOR!
dacooli 2 years ago
I love when Bill does that finger counting to really enforce his superiority.
sunsplash1980 2 years ago
well allhategod it would seem that you are watching it and in case you don't know bill oreilly has been number onein ratings for the last 8 years
cocobear33 2 years ago
Hahahaha..... are you totaly fucking retarded? haha. This cant be a real fucking show you just got to be kidding me? Is this a real show? That bill o reily dude he needs to get of Acid and try to learn how to read and not get his news from some jesus talking to him. Hahaha, man this is pure comedy. To let this shit air you gotta be nuts, who are watching this crap? hahahaha.... cant stop laugh at this, far left......
Allhategod 3 years ago
You guys are colossal idiots. Bush committed aggression against Iraq and had people tortured. He is a war criminal who lied to the American people about WMDs. Clinton should be tried as well for the economic sanctions he levied against iraq.
holymolydude 3 years ago
Pinko liberal talking points holymolydude.
What lie? Saddam killed tens of thousands of people with chemical weapons, Mahdi Obeidi was hiding parts to a nuclear centrifuge, and every intelligence organization on the western world concluded that Iraq had a WMD program. Sorry dude that dog just dont hunt.
sig0 3 years ago
We gave him chemical weapons, we didn't care when he used them on his people, UN weapons inspectors said there were no WMDs and the CIA lied as evidenced by the fact that nothing even close to a WMD has been found. Obeidi wouldn't have been able to restart the nuke program of the 90's because it was too expensive. AND you ignored the facts about torture and aggression. Bush is the American Pinochet and you're a coward and an idiot, not a patriot.
holymolydude 3 years ago
"We gave him chemical weapons"
So did he have them or not?
Saddam violated UN resolutions again & again & never once allowed the inspectors to complete their task. There was no way to verify WMD w/o the comforting certainty of hindsight upon which your argument so heavily relies.
I do so adore the left's love affair with this notion of torture. Funny, when our soldiers are caught they are beheaded on TV & your ilk are silent but when we put panties on the head of a mercenary, its torture.
sig0 3 years ago
He had them till he was forced to disarm in the 90's in accordance with UN and US demands. If the only way to confirm that a country has WMD's is to invade them then its not a justification for invasion. The UN absolutely completed their task. All the crimes you cite of Saddam's are ultimately OUR fault for putting him in power, letting him stay in power and ignoring him when he committed these crimes.
holymolydude 3 years ago
Forced to disarm? Ha! In 97 Saddam expelled all American inspectors & activated ground-to-air missile systems to deter inspection flights. Then, in 98 he refused access to "presidential sites."
In September 98, the chief U.N. inspector informed the Security Council that Iraq was barring inspections. The council passed a resolution condemning Iraq. Iraq responded by suspending all cooperation with U.N. inspections. Meanwhile he shot at allied aircraft almost daily in the no fly zones.
Liar.
sig0 3 years ago
After the gulf war Iraq was essentialy in ruins and the fiercest economic sanctions ever levied against a country were levied against Iraq. It was impossible for him to take care of his own people much less develop advanced WMD's. Post invasion inspections confirm that he was no closer to a WMD in 2003 then in 1990, regardless of whether he was complying with inspectors prior to the announcement of the invasion he didn't have WMDs, inspectors just before the invasion confirmed this.
holymolydude 3 years ago
1st...wrong
The NGIC released a report in 2006 that documented that hundreds of chemical weapons had been located since the invaision. They were not new but it proved that the limited inspections that Saddam allowed did not reveal the supply.
2nd...wrong. The inspectors were not permitted to finish.
You are talking out of both sides of your mouth. 1st you say the inpectors were allowed to do their job then you say well it doesnt matter if they were allowed to finish. It did matter.
sig0 3 years ago
Focus. The inspections were not able to be completed during the 90's but just prior to the invasion Saddam panicked and DID allow inspectors in who DID finish their job and demonstrated no WMDs. n January 2003, United Nations weapons inspectors reported that they had found no indication that Iraq possessed nuclear weapons or an active program. The inspectors didn't find the trivial amount that NGIC did because it was an old, decrepit, minuscule supply that in no way justified an invasion.
holymolydude 3 years ago
The inpectors were never allowed access to everthing prior to the invasion.
Demetrius Perricos announced that before, during and after the war, Saddam shipped WMD & medium-range ballistic missiles to countries in Europe & the M. East. Entire factories were dismantled & shipped as scrap metal to Jordan, the Netherlands & Turkey. Perricos showed 2 photos of a missile site near Baghdad, one taken in 05/03 with an active facility, the other in 02/04 that showed it had simply disappeared.
sig0 3 years ago
I assure you. The conditions at Abu Garib have greatly improved since the allies took over.
There are 4 crimes that a nation can commit to lose its sovereignty: regular aggressions against neighboring states, violation of the Genocide Convention (of which we are signatories and legally bound to act if violated), violation of the Non-Proliferation treaty, and support or host international terroists or criminals. Saddams government was a multiple offender of each offense.
sig0 3 years ago
nobody would have gone after these great Americans. today, however, there is a new breed of far-left, hateful, anti-American cunts for which no proper adjective exists to define their outright stupidity! sad irony that Lincoln set free Black slaves and now Obama just might destroy this great Country
genie0390 3 years ago
O'Reilly made his points in his Talking Points right before this segment. Would those who want to go after Bush for war crimes have gone after Lincoln, Truman, FDR, Sherman, and Grant as well?
schradersl2 3 years ago