"I think that most people think of Cleese as Basil Fawlty..."
Excuse me, in which plane of reality exactly? Fawlty Towers was hilarious, but seriously... What about the Norwegian Blue Dead Parrot, the Ministry of Silly Walks and THE MILLIONS other ways Cleese's Role in Monty Python shaped modern comicality?
I can see how the John Cleese caricature might not be immediately obvious, as caricatures are sometimes TOO exaggerated.
Still, it's interesting that when you take real photos of celebrities and distort them to exaggerate their features just enough that it still looks realistic, they become more recognizable (there have been studies on this, although I can't find any links to them right now). And some people are notoriously difficult to draw caricatures of, like Gerald Ford.
Interesting, especially considering celebrities who are actor/performers, because they themselves exaggerate their own faces and features,with make-up and facial expressions while being different characters, so not everybody will instantly see Cleese here, as he means different things to different people. Maybe more late Python than Fawlty in expression to me. Charles and Bush are easier to grasp, because they are just themselves and remain pretty much straight looking.
@henbees maybe the brain of each individual produces different caricatures of the same person. So the caricature of cleese from one person's perspective is completely different to another person? I dunno
Google "benny Hill considered funnier than Monty Python"! And google "cleese is an inbred retard"!
Bestmanme08 8 months ago
"I think that most people think of Cleese as Basil Fawlty..."
Excuse me, in which plane of reality exactly? Fawlty Towers was hilarious, but seriously... What about the Norwegian Blue Dead Parrot, the Ministry of Silly Walks and THE MILLIONS other ways Cleese's Role in Monty Python shaped modern comicality?
gieposc 11 months ago
I couldn't stop laughing at john cleese's model
brt5470 1 year ago
I can see how the John Cleese caricature might not be immediately obvious, as caricatures are sometimes TOO exaggerated.
Still, it's interesting that when you take real photos of celebrities and distort them to exaggerate their features just enough that it still looks realistic, they become more recognizable (there have been studies on this, although I can't find any links to them right now). And some people are notoriously difficult to draw caricatures of, like Gerald Ford.
holycow818181 1 year ago
@holycow818181
Interesting, especially considering celebrities who are actor/performers, because they themselves exaggerate their own faces and features,with make-up and facial expressions while being different characters, so not everybody will instantly see Cleese here, as he means different things to different people. Maybe more late Python than Fawlty in expression to me. Charles and Bush are easier to grasp, because they are just themselves and remain pretty much straight looking.
onwebcameron 1 year ago
I don't know about anyone else, but I have never heard anyone refer to Bush as President Bush the Second.
dogboy31894 2 years ago
well, he is.
henbees 1 year ago
I couldn't see john cleese in his caricature, but I could see the others. I don't know why though
ninjawhale03 2 years ago
yeah john cleese doesn't really have a big chin or weird forehead :/
henbees 1 year ago
@henbees maybe the brain of each individual produces different caricatures of the same person. So the caricature of cleese from one person's perspective is completely different to another person? I dunno
ninjawhale03 1 year ago
fascinating
GreenlandCat 2 years ago 3
John Cleese. Does that guy ever have a down day??
daffydoug 2 years ago 16
Excellent, really gets to the heart of the caricature art form.
DokterWertham 2 years ago 8
This makes sense to me
EBursey 2 years ago 5
Yay! That was fun and interesting! :D
DobbyJunior 3 years ago 4
I've always wanted to be a cartoonist.
captainmal101 3 years ago 3
You should go for it! :)
mepsib 2 years ago