@YourRoyalAnus What an appalling comment. Many ruled by the Windsor monarchy die young. As I write the TV news is reporting another teenager stabbed to death in London. Have some respect for the victims of the violence kingdoms allow.
If all in the royal family died young violently then the monarchy could be abolished and lives saved by competent republican law and order.
BethinTexas789 - No what is sick is us being forced to have a monarch as head of state and not being allowed to want those royals dead.
I note that you Beth are happy as a Texan to elect your governor as head of the state of Texas and elect a President as head of state of the USA.
Are we Britons your poor cousins across the pond who must live in a large Disney-island kingdom ruled by a medieval monarchy for you Americans to tourist to?
theofficiallily - Well when Hitler bit on his cyanide pill and shot himself in the head HE thought he deserved to die. Your idea that "nobody deserves to die" is wrong.
No-one forced Diana to think her husband and then son deserved to become King and head of state of an evil kingdom which allows the deaths of innocents who don't deserve to die.
Diana thought her family deserved a monarchy which lets innocents die.
The royals unlike pop stars DO deserve to die, in my opinion.
@BritishRepublican Hitler commit suicide because didn't want to be CAPTURED by his enemy. Had nothing to do with deserving to die.
Have you ever thought that maybe to stop the "deaths of innocents" you would NEED your family to rule the "evil" kingdom?
You speak so much assumption as if it were fact and expect your comments to be respected?
And As far as politics go, I'm 26 and I already know we're fucked no matter who rules us. It's so naive to think that being a republic would change anything.
@BritishRepublican Before you reply to my first comment with how naive I am, might I add, you say that you deserve a republic the same as U.S.A. and that competent republican law and order will save lives, but what about the fact that in republican U.S.A in an average year the number of violent murders vastly exceeds the United Kingdoms worst year.
Australia is not a republic and it has one of the lowest murder rates. Canada too, so how do you figure the violence problem is the monarchy's fault?
@frankovich213 The head of state matters, be he or she the head of a federal state, like the president of the USA or head of the individual states - governor of Texas, California. A republican constitution doesn't guarantee a good head of state, it just guarantees the people a way to get rid of a bad head of state.
I am not just a republican but also a socialist. I understand, where many American republicans do not, that you need good social security to keep crime rates down.
@frankovich213 In America the poor people are more disadvantaged than the poor in many kingdom countries, fewer rights to welfare payments when they are sick or out of work, no rights to housing benefit this puts people in a desperate position and many turn to violent crime or drug dealing which also causes violence - but where some kingdoms are fairer this is not down to the monarch being kind to the poor but because you have socialists in politics and campaigning to make the difference.
@frankovich213 However, there is only so much good socialists can achieve so long as there is a stupid monarch as head of state and whilst socialists can make a huge difference and get the crime rate away down from what it otherwise might be, there is still residual problems which are down to the monarch and kingdom.
For example, in a kingdom one socialist might be a lot smarter and better than another but the kingdom won't allow the smart socialist to take over from the stupid socialist.
@BritishRepublican I have to say that this video is rather childish. I take it you are still at school? I am no royalist and I don't look up to the royal family. I also hate the class structure in britain that keeps the old boy network in place. However, there is no need to make your point by tagging it alongside a video celebrating her death. Also, I would have thought you might have been pro-Diana; if she had lived then she may have single handedly brought down the monarchy herself!
@Fank234 I am Scottish National Standard Bearer Peter Dow and I have sent you my profile video. I am now 50 years old although you could have read my comment above where I give my age, then, as 49.
Your hatred of the class structure is futile without willing the means to remove the ruling class - war.
The deaths of royal family and the royalist, fascist ruling class help towards republican revolution since our rulers are prepared to kill anyone trying to stop them ruling this land.
@Fank234 If you think Diana may have single handedly brought down the monarchy then you are the sort of "anti-Nazi" who'd've been pro-Eva Braun & pro-Ernst Rohm.
Since Braun partnered Hitler, as Diana married Charles and since Rohm's Brown Shirts embarrassed Hitler as Diana's divorce embarrassed the royal family, the parallels are clear.
But if Churchill and the Allies had been pro-Braun and pro-Rohm to try to bring down the Nazis instead of waging war, the Nazis would have won.
@Fank234 The monarchy is a great evil as the Nazis were a great evil and the only way to oppose them is to wage war.
By getting caught up in the family life of the royals you are surrendering to an acceptance of the royals in the same way as if someone had got caught up with Hitler's love life and party rivalries.
You are thinking in a grossly inappropriate way characteristic of someone who has been brainwashed by the UK mass media who show you how you may be mildly critical of the royals.
jjpeterson1 - It is not nice to bear a son whose intention is to be king and head of state by denying the people the right to elect our own head of state.
Diana said to us "My son will rule your sons and daughters, like it or not!" That is not nice.
easy1355 - Most people want what the TV tells them to want. So they wanted Princess Diana to live - and a fat lot of good that did them. lol
Most people wanting the monarchy IS just idol talk - just like Pop Idol in fact - but with only one act performing every week - the Windsor family singers and they are crap - but with no votes ever to get rid of the Nazi scum-bags.
The royal lack of variety performance deserves the axe - just like the one which took off Charles I's head.
2008alpharex - It would be best to have individual republics for the home nations - an English republic, a Scottish republic, a Welsh republic & Irish/Ulster republic(s) AND a British republic to provide a commander in chief for the British nuclear deterrent and British aircraft carriers.
There are a few island-wide functions where it would be best to have a British president in charge.
Yes the UK should end but we Britons should be ready to defend our island and global freedom.
Mate, your argument for a republic would have meant more if u hadn't called yourself BritishRepulican.
Its easy to spot injustices when it suits your cause. The Royal family is one of the last remaining things that is truly British, The government has made us feel like racist in our own country for wanting some things just to stay British. As for a republic of Scotland, the scotts have to decide that one for themselves.
saying hings like, "Death to the Royals" only weakens your arguments more.
liamek1462 - No the royal family are anti-British traitors. The Queen's Uncle Edward was a friend of Hitler and a Nazi agent and spy. Prince Philip's sister married a Nazi SS colonel.
Look at the succession of really bad Prime Ministers and Her Majesty's Governments we have had while Queen Elizabeth was on the throne. Her fault.
No-one has done more to ruin Britain than Queen Elizabeth.
The royals have one argument to stay in power. "Try to remove us and we kill you".
I hope Britain never becomes a republic and has a president. a republic is to american.. and a "president"?? urgh! no thanks.. an elected monarchy would be better =) I think we should get to choose who our Head of State is, but Britain should remain a Kingdom.
Mountbatten conspired with his friend and heir to the UK throne Edward the Prince of Wales to use his connections with German royalty and aristocracy to support the rise of Hitler and the Nazis in the 1930s with a view to the 3rd Reich conquest of Russia.
Mountbatten caused WW2 and his great-nephew Prince Charles whom he mentored is the heir to the UK throne.
i don't think that diana deserved to die...in fact..she wasn't really even a member of the royal family at the time...she was attempting to go against them and defy their wishes when she died
AliceBellaGirl - Family wishes are not the issue - we all of us have defied someone in our family at one time or another. So what?
On the other hand, if Diana was defying and going against the UK monarchy and had become a republican seeking to remove the Windsor and successor royals by all means necessary up to and including the assassination of her own sons that would a revelation.
In reality, Diana was a royalist who was content that her son would be king - guilty as charged.
I can see your point. However, I believe that Diana was a kind women who actually cared about people who were in pain. I think she brought fame to England and made people realize that not all royal and noble people were indifferent to the suffering going on around them. I have a deep respect for Princess Diana but I am open to different opinions. Whether it will influence my thinking is another matter entirely. :)
AliceBellaGirl - Saying you care for people in pain is no use if you are the one who is causing the pain.
Monarchy and kingdoms (and dictators behaving like kings) have caused more pain and suffering than anything else in this world.
If we had had good democratic republican government all along, we could have avoided much suffering in wars, starvation and disease which got out of control.
I don't really see how the British monarchy has held back Britain, since the last true monarch who ruled as opposed to reigned was Elizabeth the First. Parliament has had all of the real power for several hundred years now.
The British monarchy is just a figurehead. They haven't any power at all: they can't enforce, write, or stop any law. I think your vehemence is misguided, the real branches of government are what are causeing your 'problems.' BTW your definition of a president has the same power as an autocrat.
How can one argue that a monarch is anti-UK? They are the height of nationalism.
"people have no power" People vote for their representatives, unless there's true democracy that's the best one can get
rs40licks1 - Your attitudes are typical of someone brainwashed by UK broadcasting.
The ANTI-British monarchy figurehead rubber-stamps an all-powerful state (the real branches of government) which can pass any law in violation of democratic constitutional rights of the citizen of which we have none.
No I am defining the role of a president in a democratic republic which is to defend constitutional rights.
The monarchy is pro-UK & anti-British. The UK by definition is a "U. Kingdom".
rs40licks1 - The monarchy is the enemy of the British nation and the home nations of Scots, English, Welsh, Irish etc.
Royalists are the biggest traitors against the nation and the people.
Sure you can vote for a republican who is then banned from parliament unless he or she swears allegiance to the monarchy and shuts up about condemning the royalist fascist police state.
Any MP or MSP can be banned from parliament by the majority. It is a long way from democracy and that's the problem.
I have to add here, every law that is passed by the government in the UK has to be put through the Queen and she has to sign a document saying that it will become law. She most definitely does have the power to stop any new laws, and if she so wishes, to change the old ones.
bayyoumi - It is the right of self-defence. They are killing us - sometimes deliberately, sometimes accidentally because they insist stupid royalists are in charge.
So we need to kill them to stop them killing us.
The UK courts and laws have judges appointed by the crown and laws given the royal assent - all MPs must swear allegiance to the Queen.
The UK is by definition rigged against bringing the royals to justice.
Republicans ARE already in power in many countries of the world.
I am not that ignorant I do know a little bit about the history between Scotland and England. Just did not realize that there were still problems between scottish people and the Monarchy but none-the-less. Thanks for the link to your website.
Tara20052 - That's not what I meant. There are hidden problems between the monarchy and Americans.
Your TV news tells you that the UK monarchy is a good friend of America.
In reality the UK defends the principle of monarchy to you and so you end up defending monarchies in the Arab world which are provoking the people, some of them to terrorism, against you.
You need to read my website and view my videos. Especially my IraqMission videos.
BritishRepublican, why do you hate the English Monarchy so much? did they do something to your family or you? I do not think that I have seen a person with this much hatred towards a group of people that. You have never met not that you probably would want to meet them.
Tara20052 - Well sure the monarchy has got in the way of a good British and/or Scottish republic, thereby dooming us and our friends to avoidable death, disasters and missed opportunities.
Of course my family has suffered along with everyone else's family.
Tara, you will find much of the political education which you lack in my Scottish National Standard Bearer website - the link is in this video's (More info).
There is quite a lot for Americans there. Click on the US flag link.
Boccherini64,just read on my email you called me a moronic idiot! dont normally reply to kids or pedophiles but here goes... you dont honestly think im offended or going to leave this video,reading your comments,and feel bad about myself? if you do then go fuck that 16 year old son of yours in the shower and dont try to fuck anyone else on here you grouchy non humorous Cunt!if you have anymore to say come up to ITC Catterick and we'll have a face to face "chat",not hiding behind a computer!
RMCDOXX0 - Lord Flashheart, you are back! The life and soul of the party has returned!
Paul won't be back commenting here - least ways not as "Boccherini64" because I have "blocked user" that username and I've removed a few of his more insulting comments too.
here are some more...heheheheheh >:P *Whats the connection between Oasis and Di? they both had smash hits with a wonderwall! *What do you give to a Princess who has everything? Seatbelt and a fucking airbag for starters! *Why is Di like a Landmine? easy to bury messy to remove("ouch"):P *What did charles say when he heared the tragic news? "Shall i put your motorbike in the shed then mum?" *what does DODI stand for? Died On Dashboard Impact ! ! ! !
Yet more party jokes. Thanks again to RMCDOXX0 for these.
Why was Elton John at the Diana Memorial? He's the only Queen who gave a fuck!
What do you expect when you go with Princess Di for a night out? A FUCKING GOOD SMASH!
Pavarotti arrives in heaven. he meets princess Di. "Ohh,you have such a lovely Halo, Di". She turns to Pavarotti "Fuck off Fatty it's a steering Wheel!"
Mocking the dead. Even if you disagree with the monarchy it's a disgrace to make fun of someones death. Have you and your equally stupid friend forgotten that at the time this lady had young children and who probably still miss her a great deal. I lost mine when i was around their age and believe it never leaves you... I think you guys should grow up and stick to the serious argument of abolishing the monarchy, this is just harmful!!
Boccherini64 - Well on VE Day, people did have fun celebrating the defeat of the Nazi regime, the death of Hitler and the end of the war in Europe.
OK there are a good number of royals to be got rid of before there can be partying in the streets as in VE Day, but with the death of Diana we can allow ourselves a brief period of rejoicing.
It may not be the end of the royals, nor the beginning of the end, but it is perhaps the end of the beginning.
Oh dear, you are not very good at comparing things are you? Well if I was a soldier or a civvy back in WW2 and had to go through all that shit and hell I would want to celebrate as well. Also, comparing the Royals to the Nazi's is ridiculous to say the least.
Well Diana's children are 3rd & 4th in line to the throne. So not far from being directly responsible, as their granny is now, for deaths of British citizens caused by their incompetence and failure to head up the state properly so that it is saving lives rather then allowing people to die.
I wouldn't be at all surprised to discover that the monarchy had a role in the deaths of your parents and if your 16 old son is stabbed on the way home from sports, you will know the Queen is to blame.
Yes they are but because they are a monarchy, not because they are British.
The time for monarchy to go is when your nation's best leaders can write, understand and defend a republican constitution.
Now is the time for a Scottish Republic. Why?
With the writing of my Scottish National Standard Bearer website, containing as it does essential elements of a Scottish Republican constitution, I am offering the required republican leadership.
Come on man, I agree with the killing of Mountbatten and an Irish Republic, but Diana didn't even want to be part of the Royal Family in the end! She was surely the best of the bunch?
MetalAaron - Well the so-called "best" of the Nazi bunch - eg. Speer - armaments minister and close personal friend of Hitler - didn't get the death penalty at Nuremberg.
Why is it people are always looking for someone in the gang to be lenient with?
To free ourselves from UK tyranny we may have to kill Diana's sons. What mother would not fight us every way she could to defend her sons?
Therefore we know whose side Diana was on - the power of monarchy her sons are in line to inherit.
Yes this really gets to the nub of it I feel sure I am being oppressed by the Royal Family I just haven't quite worked out how they're doing it. We should have one of those nice republican presidents like Bush or maybe Tony Blair would do it - just think how exciting that would be - every 6 months we could go to war with a different country. Oh joy !
bundubill - You can't work it out after being brainwashed by pro-UK royalty TV - it is an intelligence thing.
How? TV. Courts. Police. Prisons. That's usually enough to oppress - if rarely they need to bring the army to shoot the people to retain power - as on Bloody Sunday, N. Ireland - it is because the other mechanisms of control don't do the job.
Bush promoted Condoleezza Rice. Thanks W.
Therefore all his failings are forgiven, at least by me.
Blair would not be up to being President - he advocated no strong measures to impeach and remove Thatcher, the Queen, defend democracy etc.
A republic does not mean whoever is elected President gets to be president. The idea of majority dictatorship is not democratic.
Any president who fails to defend the human and democratic rights of the people - the minority - the individual even - would be impeached and removed, if a good written constitution is upheld, else a bullet.
For some reason this video is not playing for me. It just pauses and I get a black screen. How is it for you? Can you view this video?
BritishRepublican 1 year ago
What an appalling video. Diana died young. Have some respect.
YourRoyalAnus 1 year ago
@YourRoyalAnus What an appalling comment. Many ruled by the Windsor monarchy die young. As I write the TV news is reporting another teenager stabbed to death in London. Have some respect for the victims of the violence kingdoms allow.
If all in the royal family died young violently then the monarchy could be abolished and lives saved by competent republican law and order.
BritishRepublican 1 year ago
She was a PARASITE. Good riddence.
chris7801021 1 year ago
this is sick poor Princess Diana!!! You Moron!!!!!!!
BethinTexas789 1 year ago
BethinTexas789 - No what is sick is us being forced to have a monarch as head of state and not being allowed to want those royals dead.
I note that you Beth are happy as a Texan to elect your governor as head of the state of Texas and elect a President as head of state of the USA.
Are we Britons your poor cousins across the pond who must live in a large Disney-island kingdom ruled by a medieval monarchy for you Americans to tourist to?
No, we deserve a republic same as you.
BritishRepublican 1 year ago
But really, whoever is happy that someone died, is stupid, nobody deserves to die. like brittany murphey, michael jackson, and princess diana!
theofficiallily 2 years ago
theofficiallily - Well when Hitler bit on his cyanide pill and shot himself in the head HE thought he deserved to die. Your idea that "nobody deserves to die" is wrong.
No-one forced Diana to think her husband and then son deserved to become King and head of state of an evil kingdom which allows the deaths of innocents who don't deserve to die.
Diana thought her family deserved a monarchy which lets innocents die.
The royals unlike pop stars DO deserve to die, in my opinion.
BritishRepublican 1 year ago
@BritishRepublican Hitler commit suicide because didn't want to be CAPTURED by his enemy. Had nothing to do with deserving to die.
Have you ever thought that maybe to stop the "deaths of innocents" you would NEED your family to rule the "evil" kingdom?
You speak so much assumption as if it were fact and expect your comments to be respected?
And As far as politics go, I'm 26 and I already know we're fucked no matter who rules us. It's so naive to think that being a republic would change anything.
frankovich213 1 year ago
@frankovich213 He committed suicide because the Red Army surrounding him thought he deserved to die.
My family? Who? I am 49 with no children. What family?
No if you do a lot of drink and drugs you are fucked no matter who rules. Whereas if we get a good heads of states the sober people can do very well.
BritishRepublican 1 year ago
@BritishRepublican Before you reply to my first comment with how naive I am, might I add, you say that you deserve a republic the same as U.S.A. and that competent republican law and order will save lives, but what about the fact that in republican U.S.A in an average year the number of violent murders vastly exceeds the United Kingdoms worst year.
Australia is not a republic and it has one of the lowest murder rates. Canada too, so how do you figure the violence problem is the monarchy's fault?
frankovich213 1 year ago
@frankovich213 The head of state matters, be he or she the head of a federal state, like the president of the USA or head of the individual states - governor of Texas, California. A republican constitution doesn't guarantee a good head of state, it just guarantees the people a way to get rid of a bad head of state.
I am not just a republican but also a socialist. I understand, where many American republicans do not, that you need good social security to keep crime rates down.
BritishRepublican 1 year ago
@frankovich213 In America the poor people are more disadvantaged than the poor in many kingdom countries, fewer rights to welfare payments when they are sick or out of work, no rights to housing benefit this puts people in a desperate position and many turn to violent crime or drug dealing which also causes violence - but where some kingdoms are fairer this is not down to the monarch being kind to the poor but because you have socialists in politics and campaigning to make the difference.
BritishRepublican 1 year ago
@frankovich213 However, there is only so much good socialists can achieve so long as there is a stupid monarch as head of state and whilst socialists can make a huge difference and get the crime rate away down from what it otherwise might be, there is still residual problems which are down to the monarch and kingdom.
For example, in a kingdom one socialist might be a lot smarter and better than another but the kingdom won't allow the smart socialist to take over from the stupid socialist.
BritishRepublican 1 year ago
@BritishRepublican I have to say that this video is rather childish. I take it you are still at school? I am no royalist and I don't look up to the royal family. I also hate the class structure in britain that keeps the old boy network in place. However, there is no need to make your point by tagging it alongside a video celebrating her death. Also, I would have thought you might have been pro-Diana; if she had lived then she may have single handedly brought down the monarchy herself!
Fank234 1 year ago
@Fank234 I am Scottish National Standard Bearer Peter Dow and I have sent you my profile video. I am now 50 years old although you could have read my comment above where I give my age, then, as 49.
Your hatred of the class structure is futile without willing the means to remove the ruling class - war.
The deaths of royal family and the royalist, fascist ruling class help towards republican revolution since our rulers are prepared to kill anyone trying to stop them ruling this land.
BritishRepublican 1 year ago
@Fank234 If you think Diana may have single handedly brought down the monarchy then you are the sort of "anti-Nazi" who'd've been pro-Eva Braun & pro-Ernst Rohm.
Since Braun partnered Hitler, as Diana married Charles and since Rohm's Brown Shirts embarrassed Hitler as Diana's divorce embarrassed the royal family, the parallels are clear.
But if Churchill and the Allies had been pro-Braun and pro-Rohm to try to bring down the Nazis instead of waging war, the Nazis would have won.
BritishRepublican 1 year ago
@Fank234 The monarchy is a great evil as the Nazis were a great evil and the only way to oppose them is to wage war.
By getting caught up in the family life of the royals you are surrendering to an acceptance of the royals in the same way as if someone had got caught up with Hitler's love life and party rivalries.
You are thinking in a grossly inappropriate way characteristic of someone who has been brainwashed by the UK mass media who show you how you may be mildly critical of the royals.
BritishRepublican 1 year ago
A kind and real person would give up such a idiot, tyrannical, abusing and corrupted titles.
Monarchy NO MORE!
eliaspina 2 years ago 5
Diana was the only nice person in the royal family, the rest are trash.
jjpeterson1 2 years ago 8
jjpeterson1 - It is not nice to bear a son whose intention is to be king and head of state by denying the people the right to elect our own head of state.
Diana said to us "My son will rule your sons and daughters, like it or not!" That is not nice.
BritishRepublican 2 years ago
I seriously doubt Di said it like that lol!!!!!!!
BethinTexas789 1 year ago
I see she couldnt give good head after her crash
esther443 2 years ago
You know do you?
The the fuck up you ignorant fool
RackJacket 2 years ago
@jjpeterson1
They are all trash.
chris7801021 1 year ago
No one group of people are better than another. The monarchy should be abolished. The idea that they are special just runs contrary to common sense.
phlewis86 2 years ago 17
I agree!
They should put them up against a wall and blow thair fucking brains out!!!
briggles 2 years ago
Who cares, most people want a monarchy... so, it's just idol talk.
easy1355 2 years ago
easy1355 - Most people want what the TV tells them to want. So they wanted Princess Diana to live - and a fat lot of good that did them. lol
Most people wanting the monarchy IS just idol talk - just like Pop Idol in fact - but with only one act performing every week - the Windsor family singers and they are crap - but with no votes ever to get rid of the Nazi scum-bags.
The royal lack of variety performance deserves the axe - just like the one which took off Charles I's head.
BritishRepublican 2 years ago
I'm not an ant and I'm not a bee so fuck the queen and all her family!
briggles 2 years ago
i hope there is never a British Republic, the whole UK should be broken up, an English Republic that would be nice.
2008alpharex 2 years ago
2008alpharex - It would be best to have individual republics for the home nations - an English republic, a Scottish republic, a Welsh republic & Irish/Ulster republic(s) AND a British republic to provide a commander in chief for the British nuclear deterrent and British aircraft carriers.
There are a few island-wide functions where it would be best to have a British president in charge.
Yes the UK should end but we Britons should be ready to defend our island and global freedom.
BritishRepublican 2 years ago
Mate, your argument for a republic would have meant more if u hadn't called yourself BritishRepulican.
Its easy to spot injustices when it suits your cause. The Royal family is one of the last remaining things that is truly British, The government has made us feel like racist in our own country for wanting some things just to stay British. As for a republic of Scotland, the scotts have to decide that one for themselves.
saying hings like, "Death to the Royals" only weakens your arguments more.
liamek1462 2 years ago
liamek1462 - No the royal family are anti-British traitors. The Queen's Uncle Edward was a friend of Hitler and a Nazi agent and spy. Prince Philip's sister married a Nazi SS colonel.
Look at the succession of really bad Prime Ministers and Her Majesty's Governments we have had while Queen Elizabeth was on the throne. Her fault.
No-one has done more to ruin Britain than Queen Elizabeth.
The royals have one argument to stay in power. "Try to remove us and we kill you".
Get them 1st.
BritishRepublican 2 years ago
lollolololololol let's all laugh . fuck the monarchy
boabp84 3 years ago 13
stuck up cunt,she only did charity work to get one over on that dopey charles.
bromleygang 3 years ago
I hope Britain never becomes a republic and has a president. a republic is to american.. and a "president"?? urgh! no thanks.. an elected monarchy would be better =) I think we should get to choose who our Head of State is, but Britain should remain a Kingdom.
H5Z 3 years ago
What the hell are you talking about? you can't have an elected monarchy, they inherit thair position.
Presidents are elected, chosen by the people for the people, it's more democratic and cheaper than paying to keep an entire royal family.
briggles 2 years ago
Princess Di is dead. Everybody in Portland,Oregon is crying.
*dies laughing*
imthenextmkb 3 years ago
Comment removed
briggles 3 years ago
briggles - See! It is not that you are shy - you CAN make a comment on YouTube when you wish.
But for some reason, you haven't yet made a comment on the For Freedom Forums. I wonder why?
I think I saw you log in today - "Bad Ass Republican" - that is you right? But you didn't make your presence felt by posting in the forums.
Well you are welcome to post there when you decide that you are "bad ass" enough actually to post. LOL.
BritishRepublican 3 years ago
but i do thank you for thanking the IRA for killin lord mountbatten, the bastard was warned.
johnny45irish 3 years ago
Its not like Mountbatten fought Japanese imperialism in WW2 and gave India independance in 1947. He was a good man you fuck, you people make me sick.
Spacepope3k 3 years ago
Spacepope3k - A good man? Hmm. A conspiracy theory goes as follows -
Mountbatten's childhood sweetheart was Grand Duchess Maria Nikolaevna of Russia who was executed on the orders of Lenin in 1918.
So Mountbatten had a pathological hatred for the Russian revolution and the Red Army, not just the excesses of the Soviet secret police.
(conspiracy theory continues ...)
BritishRepublican 3 years ago
Spacepope3k - (Conspiracy theory continues ..)
Mountbatten conspired with his friend and heir to the UK throne Edward the Prince of Wales to use his connections with German royalty and aristocracy to support the rise of Hitler and the Nazis in the 1930s with a view to the 3rd Reich conquest of Russia.
Mountbatten caused WW2 and his great-nephew Prince Charles whom he mentored is the heir to the UK throne.
Scary huh? lol
BritishRepublican 3 years ago
i don't think that diana deserved to die...in fact..she wasn't really even a member of the royal family at the time...she was attempting to go against them and defy their wishes when she died
AliceBellaGirl 3 years ago
AliceBellaGirl - Family wishes are not the issue - we all of us have defied someone in our family at one time or another. So what?
On the other hand, if Diana was defying and going against the UK monarchy and had become a republican seeking to remove the Windsor and successor royals by all means necessary up to and including the assassination of her own sons that would a revelation.
In reality, Diana was a royalist who was content that her son would be king - guilty as charged.
BritishRepublican 3 years ago
I can see your point. However, I believe that Diana was a kind women who actually cared about people who were in pain. I think she brought fame to England and made people realize that not all royal and noble people were indifferent to the suffering going on around them. I have a deep respect for Princess Diana but I am open to different opinions. Whether it will influence my thinking is another matter entirely. :)
AliceBellaGirl 2 years ago
AliceBellaGirl - Saying you care for people in pain is no use if you are the one who is causing the pain.
Monarchy and kingdoms (and dictators behaving like kings) have caused more pain and suffering than anything else in this world.
If we had had good democratic republican government all along, we could have avoided much suffering in wars, starvation and disease which got out of control.
BritishRepublican 2 years ago
My oath is to the people!
briggles 3 years ago
briggles - Good man!
Hey briggles when you are going to register and post on the For Freedom Forums?
I must have invited you loads of times already. You must have the links by now. What IS the problem?
BritishRepublican 3 years ago
I don't really see how the British monarchy has held back Britain, since the last true monarch who ruled as opposed to reigned was Elizabeth the First. Parliament has had all of the real power for several hundred years now.
rs40licks1 3 years ago
rs40licks1 - Well the UK state holds all of the real power (the people have no power) and that is the problem.
The Queen rubber-stamps a judicial and parliamentary dictatorship.
The job of a president in a democratic republic is to stop the institutions of the state taking all power from the people.
The anti-British UK monarchy's power is -
- to insist there is no president as head of state to limit state power and
- to defend the UK as a rampant royalist, fascist police state.
BritishRepublican 3 years ago
The British monarchy is just a figurehead. They haven't any power at all: they can't enforce, write, or stop any law. I think your vehemence is misguided, the real branches of government are what are causeing your 'problems.' BTW your definition of a president has the same power as an autocrat.
How can one argue that a monarch is anti-UK? They are the height of nationalism.
"people have no power" People vote for their representatives, unless there's true democracy that's the best one can get
rs40licks1 3 years ago 6
rs40licks1 - Your attitudes are typical of someone brainwashed by UK broadcasting.
The ANTI-British monarchy figurehead rubber-stamps an all-powerful state (the real branches of government) which can pass any law in violation of democratic constitutional rights of the citizen of which we have none.
No I am defining the role of a president in a democratic republic which is to defend constitutional rights.
The monarchy is pro-UK & anti-British. The UK by definition is a "U. Kingdom".
BritishRepublican 3 years ago
rs40licks1 - The monarchy is the enemy of the British nation and the home nations of Scots, English, Welsh, Irish etc.
Royalists are the biggest traitors against the nation and the people.
Sure you can vote for a republican who is then banned from parliament unless he or she swears allegiance to the monarchy and shuts up about condemning the royalist fascist police state.
Any MP or MSP can be banned from parliament by the majority. It is a long way from democracy and that's the problem.
BritishRepublican 3 years ago
I have to add here, every law that is passed by the government in the UK has to be put through the Queen and she has to sign a document saying that it will become law. She most definitely does have the power to stop any new laws, and if she so wishes, to change the old ones.
sacraficialangel7 2 years ago
Well if they did something bad it doesnt give u the right to try them and kill them. I guess there are courts and laws.
If this is ur scheme REPUBLICANS then god knows what u gonna do if god forbids u took power.
bayyoumi 3 years ago
Fuck off you royalist asshole, this video is for republicans only!
briggles 3 years ago
bayyoumi - It is the right of self-defence. They are killing us - sometimes deliberately, sometimes accidentally because they insist stupid royalists are in charge.
So we need to kill them to stop them killing us.
The UK courts and laws have judges appointed by the crown and laws given the royal assent - all MPs must swear allegiance to the Queen.
The UK is by definition rigged against bringing the royals to justice.
Republicans ARE already in power in many countries of the world.
BritishRepublican 3 years ago
I will celebrate when those self-appointed bigots will stand trial for high treason and have all "their" possessions impounded.
lurconis666 3 years ago 6
So will I
briggles 3 years ago
Britishrepublican are you a member of the british republican party?
briggles 3 years ago
"briggles" - "The British Republican Party"? Never heard of them. Do they exist?
If they want me as party leader or president, I will definitely join! LOL.
BritishRepublican 3 years ago
Are you a member of any republican organisation? If yes, can I join?
briggles 3 years ago
briggles - Yes I AM a republican organiser and yes you can join up with my republican organisations if you are able.
* Subscribe to the BritishRepublican channel (which you have already on your own initiative - well done)
* Join "Peter Dow TV - Join This Viewers Group" - (I invited you already but you have not joined yet - you must concentrate and work harder!)
* Register for the For Freedom Forums, for robust political debate.
See this video's (more info) for links to both.
BritishRepublican 3 years ago
1 less parasite scrounging off the public good riddence
republicanira2003 3 years ago 22
Comment removed
briggles 3 years ago
I am not that ignorant I do know a little bit about the history between Scotland and England. Just did not realize that there were still problems between scottish people and the Monarchy but none-the-less. Thanks for the link to your website.
Tara20052 3 years ago
Tara20052 - That's not what I meant. There are hidden problems between the monarchy and Americans.
Your TV news tells you that the UK monarchy is a good friend of America.
In reality the UK defends the principle of monarchy to you and so you end up defending monarchies in the Arab world which are provoking the people, some of them to terrorism, against you.
You need to read my website and view my videos. Especially my IraqMission videos.
See (more info) for links to my videos.
BritishRepublican 3 years ago
BritishRepublican, why do you hate the English Monarchy so much? did they do something to your family or you? I do not think that I have seen a person with this much hatred towards a group of people that. You have never met not that you probably would want to meet them.
Tara20052 3 years ago
Tara20052 - Well sure the monarchy has got in the way of a good British and/or Scottish republic, thereby dooming us and our friends to avoidable death, disasters and missed opportunities.
Of course my family has suffered along with everyone else's family.
Tara, you will find much of the political education which you lack in my Scottish National Standard Bearer website - the link is in this video's (More info).
There is quite a lot for Americans there. Click on the US flag link.
BritishRepublican 3 years ago
Comment removed
briggles 3 years ago
Boccherini64,just read on my email you called me a moronic idiot! dont normally reply to kids or pedophiles but here goes... you dont honestly think im offended or going to leave this video,reading your comments,and feel bad about myself? if you do then go fuck that 16 year old son of yours in the shower and dont try to fuck anyone else on here you grouchy non humorous Cunt!if you have anymore to say come up to ITC Catterick and we'll have a face to face "chat",not hiding behind a computer!
RMCDOXX0 3 years ago
RMCDOXX0 - Lord Flashheart, you are back! The life and soul of the party has returned!
Paul won't be back commenting here - least ways not as "Boccherini64" because I have "blocked user" that username and I've removed a few of his more insulting comments too.
Hey Paul - don't forget to use soap! lol
BritishRepublican 3 years ago
RMCDOXX0 3 years ago
Some party jokes. Thanks to RMCDOXX0 for these.
What does DODI stand for? Died on Direct impact..OR.. Died Of Driver Intoxication....OR...Died opposite Di.
The mortuary attendant was zipping UP the body bags when he sang 'Zipup de Dodi, zipup de Di'.
Why is Princess Diana like the Queen Mum? They both died pushing 102.
Why did Diana cross the road? Momentum
What would Princess Diana be doing now if she was still alive? Scratching the fuck out the lid of her coffin.
BritishRepublican 3 years ago
Some more party jokes. Thanks to RMCDOXX0 for these.
What was the difference between Princess Di's driver and George Best? George Best could take corners pissed.
What do Princess Di and Ferrero Rocher have in common? They both come out of France in a fancy box
Thanks to Princess Diana, Hyde Park has that lovely fountain...and Paris has that lovely SLOW DOWN sign
What do you get if you rearrange the letters in Princess Diana? Snap! Dies In Car
BritishRepublican 3 years ago
Yet more party jokes. Thanks again to RMCDOXX0 for these.
Why was Elton John at the Diana Memorial? He's the only Queen who gave a fuck!
What do you expect when you go with Princess Di for a night out? A FUCKING GOOD SMASH!
Pavarotti arrives in heaven. he meets princess Di. "Ohh,you have such a lovely Halo, Di". She turns to Pavarotti "Fuck off Fatty it's a steering Wheel!"
BritishRepublican 3 years ago
I'm a British republican, but you guys are a total disgrace!!!
Boccherini64 3 years ago
Boccherini64 - Oh don't be such a party pooper Paul. Come away in, join the party and help yourself to some grapes-of-wrath wine.
I'd introduce you to Lord Flashheart (RMCDOXX0) but he seems to have left the party, possibly because there are no women here yet.
Flashheart does the party jokes and I do the party politics.
So who exactly is a "total disgrace" and why?
BritishRepublican 3 years ago
Mocking the dead. Even if you disagree with the monarchy it's a disgrace to make fun of someones death. Have you and your equally stupid friend forgotten that at the time this lady had young children and who probably still miss her a great deal. I lost mine when i was around their age and believe it never leaves you... I think you guys should grow up and stick to the serious argument of abolishing the monarchy, this is just harmful!!
Boccherini64 3 years ago
Boccherini64 - Well on VE Day, people did have fun celebrating the defeat of the Nazi regime, the death of Hitler and the end of the war in Europe.
OK there are a good number of royals to be got rid of before there can be partying in the streets as in VE Day, but with the death of Diana we can allow ourselves a brief period of rejoicing.
It may not be the end of the royals, nor the beginning of the end, but it is perhaps the end of the beginning.
"We'll meet again, don't know where ..."
BritishRepublican 3 years ago
Oh dear, you are not very good at comparing things are you? Well if I was a soldier or a civvy back in WW2 and had to go through all that shit and hell I would want to celebrate as well. Also, comparing the Royals to the Nazi's is ridiculous to say the least.
snafu1989 3 years ago
Well Diana's children are 3rd & 4th in line to the throne. So not far from being directly responsible, as their granny is now, for deaths of British citizens caused by their incompetence and failure to head up the state properly so that it is saving lives rather then allowing people to die.
I wouldn't be at all surprised to discover that the monarchy had a role in the deaths of your parents and if your 16 old son is stabbed on the way home from sports, you will know the Queen is to blame.
BritishRepublican 3 years ago
British monarchy = MURDEROUS racist anacronic elite
ultraplus1 3 years ago
ultraplus1 - "anachronistic" you mean?
Yes they are but because they are a monarchy, not because they are British.
The time for monarchy to go is when your nation's best leaders can write, understand and defend a republican constitution.
Now is the time for a Scottish Republic. Why?
With the writing of my Scottish National Standard Bearer website, containing as it does essential elements of a Scottish Republican constitution, I am offering the required republican leadership.
BritishRepublican 3 years ago
Come on man, I agree with the killing of Mountbatten and an Irish Republic, but Diana didn't even want to be part of the Royal Family in the end! She was surely the best of the bunch?
MetalAaron 3 years ago 3
MetalAaron - Well the so-called "best" of the Nazi bunch - eg. Speer - armaments minister and close personal friend of Hitler - didn't get the death penalty at Nuremberg.
Why is it people are always looking for someone in the gang to be lenient with?
To free ourselves from UK tyranny we may have to kill Diana's sons. What mother would not fight us every way she could to defend her sons?
Therefore we know whose side Diana was on - the power of monarchy her sons are in line to inherit.
BritishRepublican 3 years ago
Yes this really gets to the nub of it I feel sure I am being oppressed by the Royal Family I just haven't quite worked out how they're doing it. We should have one of those nice republican presidents like Bush or maybe Tony Blair would do it - just think how exciting that would be - every 6 months we could go to war with a different country. Oh joy !
bundubill 3 years ago
bundubill - You can't work it out after being brainwashed by pro-UK royalty TV - it is an intelligence thing.
How? TV. Courts. Police. Prisons. That's usually enough to oppress - if rarely they need to bring the army to shoot the people to retain power - as on Bloody Sunday, N. Ireland - it is because the other mechanisms of control don't do the job.
Bush promoted Condoleezza Rice. Thanks W.
Therefore all his failings are forgiven, at least by me.
True, Bush could have done more.
BritishRepublican 3 years ago
bundubill -
Blair would not be up to being President - he advocated no strong measures to impeach and remove Thatcher, the Queen, defend democracy etc.
A republic does not mean whoever is elected President gets to be president. The idea of majority dictatorship is not democratic.
Any president who fails to defend the human and democratic rights of the people - the minority - the individual even - would be impeached and removed, if a good written constitution is upheld, else a bullet.
BritishRepublican 3 years ago