★１★ The film “John Rabe” is full of venomous incitement against the japanese.
In those days, European or American newspaper reporters sent to their countries the article "Nanjing Massacre" based on hearsay from the Chinese. However, there were no Europeans and no Americans who actually witnessed the massacre.
John.Rabe has also witnessed nothing like massacre !!
Why many Chinese people came back to Nanking after Japanese occupied the city?
Because the incident was not Massacre of civilians but the only hard battle between the both brave armies. The title of the fair book on amazon in USA and UK is "The Alleged Nanking Massacre : Japan's rebuttal to China's forged claims" .
Bedankt voor de trailer. Als je de film wilt zien kom dan vrijdag 12 november naar Mijdrecht. Daar wordt de film vertoond in de Veenhartkerk, Grutto 2a.
(Part7)To my mind, this should not concern us Germans, particularly since one can clearly see that the Chinese, once left to depend solely on the Japanese, immediately fraternize. And as for all these excesses, one hears only one side of it, after all.”
That report is called untrustworthy story after people defined the fact.
(Part6)P. Scharfienberg, the secretary general of the German Embassy to China, who returned to Nanking city on January 9, tried to investigate the fact about 'Japanese Army's atrocities Rabe reported' by himself, and wrote to the German Embassy at Hankow on February 10: “He [Rabe] is still actively trying to counter the bloody excesses of Japanese looters, which have unfortunately increased of late.
(Part5)They were Von Falkenhausen, the head of the military advisory group in China, and Rabe, who represented an interest of Siemens in the Chinese munitions industry as a pro-Chinese group. Rabe exaggerated the Japanese Army’s atrocities and requested Hitler to reconsider the alliance with Japan. Rabe's anti-Japanese reports had been thought suspicious since then.
(Part4)The Japanese government repeatedly demanded that Germany stop the export of weapons to Japan's enemy Chiang Kai-shek. As the result, Hitler decided to take advantage of containment against the Soviet Union by promoting strong relationship with Japan. Germany refrained from exporting weapons to the Chiang Kai-shek. (In fact, it was in l940 when Germany reached an agreement with Japan.) There were someone strongly resisted the change of policy taken by Hitler.
(Part3)According to German historian Gerhard Krebs, the reason was based on power politics in his German homeland. “Defeated and depressed in World War I, Germany knew that china was a significant trade partner. Particularly Chiang Kai-shek, who was fighting against the CCP, needed a large number of weapons, while Germany was able to import raw materials that were indispensable for the postwar reconstruction.” The Sino-Japanese War forced Germany to reconsider its foreign policy toward China.
(Part2)For Fear of counter objections, he reported to the Japanese authorities in Nanking city the number of casualties to be 49 based on some extent of reliable information. But on the other hand, to journalists, German diplomats and A. Hitler who were all absent in Nanking, he reported figures with an enormous difference, as if no less than tens of thousands civilians had been killed by Japanese troops. Why did Rabe make a false report of the massacre to Hitler?
(Part1)I have already read the article, which was John Rabe’s diary on 13 December 1937 before. John Rabe wrote the story in his diary. Do you know John Rabe, who had never witnessed even one case of murder, sent a report to Hitler and wrote to his diary? His diary and reports to Germany were written different number of victims.
The Tungchow Mutiny was a cruel massacre because Chinese killed many nonresistance Japanese and Koreans civilians in Tōngzhōu, China on 29 July 1937..
The Tungchow Mutiny was a cruel massacre because Chinese killed many nonresistance Japanese and Koreans civilians in Tōngzhōu, China on 29 July 1937.
Definitely, Chinese inhumanity killing ways and means was handed down in Chinese traditionally. In other words, Chinese only could do such a thing cruelly because this was the sort of stunt their ancestor always pulls.
The other nationalities might aren't beyond the conception such as Chinese style. In short, The Nanking Massacre was a created story by Chinese who had killed nonresistance civilians of Japanese and Koreans in the Tungchow Mutiny. Unmistakably,
the Nanking Massacre was based on the Tungchow Mutiny. They took a hint from the mutiny. This is one of evidence shows that the Nanking Massacre was made up story.
It's interesting to note that 'so-called Nanking Massacre' is a victimless murder. There are 'self-confessed ex-Japanese soldiers' who testify that the Imperial Japanese Army committed atrocities against Chinese soldiers and civilians at 'so-called Nanking Massacre', however, the dead bodies that Japanese soldiers are suspected to have massacred have not found yet. Nanking Massacre should be called 'a victimless crime' or 'a victimless murder'.
Testimony is only testimony. Not all of testimonies are evidences. Testimony is always required proof. Testimony is always required rationality and credibility. We can describe only 'testimonies which have been supported by rationality and credibility' as personal evidences (antonym: physical evidences). A man tends to believe whatever he wants. We should always hear their testimonies from an objective perspective.
We Japanese know that there are several 'self-confessed ex-Japanese soldiers' who testify that the Imperial Japanese Army committed atrocities against Chinese soldiers and civilians at 'so-called Nanking Massacre' (1937). However, it is a fact that there are many ex-Japanese soldiers who testify that Nanking Massacre never happened, while there are several 'self-confessed ex-Japanese soldiers' who testify that Nanking Massacre happened.
The Chinese army has tried to hold Nanking but failed and to late to evacuating the people. So no one can escape from the murders that the Japanese army comited.
The Japanese were just as much murderous barbarians as the nazis. Who was keeping count? does anyone think thst the japanese powers that be were keeping a count of rape and murder that went on ? Ask my father and grandparents from the grave ..yeah..i would relay on that. I am from the phlilppenes. nice try. ICE BOXES hahahaha!
This has been flagged as spam show
★１★ The film “John Rabe” is full of venomous incitement against the japanese.
In those days, European or American newspaper reporters sent to their countries the article "Nanjing Massacre" based on hearsay from the Chinese. However, there were no Europeans and no Americans who actually witnessed the massacre.
John.Rabe has also witnessed nothing like massacre !!
oneofthejapanese 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
★２★ I know Germans have endured the stigma of the Nazi many years.
But are they going to recover their honor at the expense of the honor of the Japanese ?
Japanese refuse this kind of endless ugly carping.
oneofthejapanese 1 month ago
The story based on what happens in Nanking 1937. It show that 1 man with enough courage can save people from massacre.
battlecomputer 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
watch?v=Nr_eThF6I00&feature=related
yokonoriddim 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
watch?v=Nr_eThF6I00&feature=related
yokonoriddim 10 months ago
Comment removed
yokonoriddim 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Why many Chinese people came back to Nanking after Japanese occupied the city?
Because the incident was not Massacre of civilians but the only hard battle between the both brave armies. The title of the fair book on amazon in USA and UK is "The Alleged Nanking Massacre : Japan's rebuttal to China's forged claims" .
Thank you.
SOVIETasTheINVADER 1 year ago
Beautiful movie! hard to understand why people do such things to each other.
schaapje35 1 year ago
Japannerssss!!! anti Nederlanderssssss!!!!!
NPTJE 1 year ago
@yasuhiroiida Fucking Jap!
Tiberiotertio 1 year ago
Bedankt voor de trailer. Als je de film wilt zien kom dan vrijdag 12 november naar Mijdrecht. Daar wordt de film vertoond in de Veenhartkerk, Grutto 2a.
NWnico 1 year ago
(Part7)To my mind, this should not concern us Germans, particularly since one can clearly see that the Chinese, once left to depend solely on the Japanese, immediately fraternize. And as for all these excesses, one hears only one side of it, after all.”
That report is called untrustworthy story after people defined the fact.
undertakerRach 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
(Part6)P. Scharfienberg, the secretary general of the German Embassy to China, who returned to Nanking city on January 9, tried to investigate the fact about 'Japanese Army's atrocities Rabe reported' by himself, and wrote to the German Embassy at Hankow on February 10: “He [Rabe] is still actively trying to counter the bloody excesses of Japanese looters, which have unfortunately increased of late.
undertakerRach 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
(Part5)They were Von Falkenhausen, the head of the military advisory group in China, and Rabe, who represented an interest of Siemens in the Chinese munitions industry as a pro-Chinese group. Rabe exaggerated the Japanese Army’s atrocities and requested Hitler to reconsider the alliance with Japan. Rabe's anti-Japanese reports had been thought suspicious since then.
undertakerRach 1 year ago
(Part4)The Japanese government repeatedly demanded that Germany stop the export of weapons to Japan's enemy Chiang Kai-shek. As the result, Hitler decided to take advantage of containment against the Soviet Union by promoting strong relationship with Japan. Germany refrained from exporting weapons to the Chiang Kai-shek. (In fact, it was in l940 when Germany reached an agreement with Japan.) There were someone strongly resisted the change of policy taken by Hitler.
undertakerRach 1 year ago
(Part3)According to German historian Gerhard Krebs, the reason was based on power politics in his German homeland. “Defeated and depressed in World War I, Germany knew that china was a significant trade partner. Particularly Chiang Kai-shek, who was fighting against the CCP, needed a large number of weapons, while Germany was able to import raw materials that were indispensable for the postwar reconstruction.” The Sino-Japanese War forced Germany to reconsider its foreign policy toward China.
undertakerRach 1 year ago
(Part2)For Fear of counter objections, he reported to the Japanese authorities in Nanking city the number of casualties to be 49 based on some extent of reliable information. But on the other hand, to journalists, German diplomats and A. Hitler who were all absent in Nanking, he reported figures with an enormous difference, as if no less than tens of thousands civilians had been killed by Japanese troops. Why did Rabe make a false report of the massacre to Hitler?
undertakerRach 1 year ago
(Part1)I have already read the article, which was John Rabe’s diary on 13 December 1937 before. John Rabe wrote the story in his diary. Do you know John Rabe, who had never witnessed even one case of murder, sent a report to Hitler and wrote to his diary? His diary and reports to Germany were written different number of victims.
undertakerRach 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Tungchow Mutiny was a cruel massacre because Chinese killed many nonresistance Japanese and Koreans civilians in Tōngzhōu, China on 29 July 1937..
MrZacao 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Tungchow Mutiny was a cruel massacre because Chinese killed many nonresistance Japanese and Koreans civilians in Tōngzhōu, China on 29 July 1937.
MrZacao 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Chinese government created the history of Nanking Massacre, which based on the Tungchow Mutiny in 1937.
MrZacao 1 year ago
Comment removed
MrZacao 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
The slaughterer Chinese killed them mercilessly; the way of killing and torturing was the same as the way of time-honored custom in China.
MrZacao 1 year ago
Definitely, Chinese inhumanity killing ways and means was handed down in Chinese traditionally. In other words, Chinese only could do such a thing cruelly because this was the sort of stunt their ancestor always pulls.
MrZacao 1 year ago
The other nationalities might aren't beyond the conception such as Chinese style. In short, The Nanking Massacre was a created story by Chinese who had killed nonresistance civilians of Japanese and Koreans in the Tungchow Mutiny. Unmistakably,
MrZacao 1 year ago 2
the Nanking Massacre was based on the Tungchow Mutiny. They took a hint from the mutiny. This is one of evidence shows that the Nanking Massacre was made up story.
MrZacao 1 year ago 2
Comment removed
MrZacao 1 year ago
Comment removed
MrZacao 1 year ago
It's interesting to note that 'so-called Nanking Massacre' is a victimless murder. There are 'self-confessed ex-Japanese soldiers' who testify that the Imperial Japanese Army committed atrocities against Chinese soldiers and civilians at 'so-called Nanking Massacre', however, the dead bodies that Japanese soldiers are suspected to have massacred have not found yet. Nanking Massacre should be called 'a victimless crime' or 'a victimless murder'.
Sorokini376k 1 year ago 2
Testimony is only testimony. Not all of testimonies are evidences. Testimony is always required proof. Testimony is always required rationality and credibility. We can describe only 'testimonies which have been supported by rationality and credibility' as personal evidences (antonym: physical evidences). A man tends to believe whatever he wants. We should always hear their testimonies from an objective perspective.
Sorokini376k 1 year ago 2
We Japanese know that there are several 'self-confessed ex-Japanese soldiers' who testify that the Imperial Japanese Army committed atrocities against Chinese soldiers and civilians at 'so-called Nanking Massacre' (1937). However, it is a fact that there are many ex-Japanese soldiers who testify that Nanking Massacre never happened, while there are several 'self-confessed ex-Japanese soldiers' who testify that Nanking Massacre happened.
Sorokini376k 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is the same plot as 9.11.
I am only writing the record of the truth.
Japan is not violating International Law.
McArthur knew that.
Sorokini376k 1 year ago
The Chinese army has tried to hold Nanking but failed and to late to evacuating the people. So no one can escape from the murders that the Japanese army comited.
unizob 1 year ago
The Japanese were just as much murderous barbarians as the nazis. Who was keeping count? does anyone think thst the japanese powers that be were keeping a count of rape and murder that went on ? Ask my father and grandparents from the grave ..yeah..i would relay on that. I am from the phlilppenes. nice try. ICE BOXES hahahaha!
Goyokiki 1 year ago
hij ziet er goed uit.
wil ik wel naar toe.
12bouke11 2 years ago