when they do an evac test,they should count injured people,babies,passengers w/ disabilities etc.blankets and pillows on the floor will not kill anyone....they should simulate smoke in the plane and play a tape of people crying and screaming or something to send out panic in the cabin so it will be like a real emergency....
I don't think there is an asian flight attendant - I just think the German one who was shouting "raus raus" - out out - was pretty hysterical given the importance of the test.
Lufthansa Flightattendants did the evacuation. And typical LH the didn't know any commands. They have the worst training ever. And I am speaking from experience. So unprofesional.
@MaxMagZitroneneistee 1) i didn't even say she was german and she sounds aisian and looks it aswell,2)no she fucking never,3)i don't care what u say ,4)i wasn't even talking to u in the first place, 5)go home lil boy
What about people in wheelchairs or older people that need assistance or small children,,, I didn't see any ..... Is the Asian flight attendant helping them??? : )
@jxpulid Based on the certification the Airbus A380 was certified under the regulations state that of the passengers 40% must be female and 15% must be over 50 and female. 3 dolls are used to represent infants to be carried by passengers. You can't be an employee of the company or taken part in a similar test in 6 months to take part. Also as shown in the video they only get to use half the exits (representing fire and other obstacles) AND have to do it in 90 seconds!!
@bradporky16 You'd rather they quietly whispered to the passengers to please leave the plane? Send out written invitations? If this is your idea of freaking out you haven't seen anything yet. What you're seeing here is efficiency at its best: it's dark, nobody can see a thing. So you shout at people to get them out of the plane. And push them if needed. It's an emergency, no time to be nice. Freaking out is screaming while you don't know what you're doing. This here is efficiency.
@Smoznizjev i think the flight attendants calmy, but loudly, repeating "exit this way, this way out" or some variation of that would suffice. and as for your comment about me thinking that is freaking out, fuck you. that WAS freaking out. controlled? yes. but freaking out nonetheless. and before you give me some bullshit about how everyone's tough on youtube, look me up next time you're in san diego.
@bradporky16 Are you seriously threatening a person you've never seen before, or ever heard of, on the internet, because he said you haven't seen anything yet if you thought that was freaking out? Wow. Internet tough guys, gotta love 'em...
And they weren't freaking out, but doing their job. And doing a fantastic job. If they were to do as you suggest (calmly say 'exit this way'), it would have taken at least two minutes, as people would have calmly waited their turns, leaving enough space.
they should have shown the 'one injury' dick waab,and pound him or her,will probably cause people to die in a real crash!!!!cannot stand panicking people....
The flight attendants are classic. I know this is their job, but they are extra funny in this video. People sitting next to the exits are the most lucky.
these tests are so flawed. in real emergencies, there can be people with broken bones, who cannot move so fast, debris in the walkway, unstable grounds... they should not just do 1 test that seems 'perfect'. they need to do multiple tests with many different senario's.
All those people knew they had to evacuate and the brain was already looking for a way out whether they consciously knew it or not. Wired news did an article reporting how false these tests are.
I am assuming that the flight attendants were trained to act as if there is a wall of fire coming at them and as if the plane is about to explode.
The aim of the exercise is to prove to the authorities that the plane can be evacuated in case of a real fire or crash landing. Job well done by everybody involved!
I'm looking forward to seeing the same exercise by Boeing for their 787.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
god these flight attendance would piss me off. if the guy at 2:25 was yelling at me that close and pushing me into people i would have turned around and punched him in the face, then the lady at 2:40 (which needs to get slapped as well) needs to 1) shutup cuz shes just making the situation worse 2) get laid 3) and stop sounding as if she was on fire.
jerry13157: You'll think differently when you're stuck on an airplane on fire and there's a passenger blocking an exit and a flight attendant pushes him. In an emergency, flight attendants are there to save your life, not to be friendly :-)
@jerrry13157 Not every christian is that way that you NEED to be with your family on x-mas. My family is just downstairs a mom a dad and a little brother. What's wrong with not going you all your aunts and nieces at x-mas, we hardly know them. Screw them as we live all scatared over europe. Fucking mongloid.
This has nothing to do with "AIRBUS". Every passanger plane is tested in the same way as stipulated by the FAA and other governmental bodies. You cannot test every eventuality but this baseline (under 90 seconds) leaves room for problems like you`ve mentioned.
But enlighten us, how would you certificate a procedure that almost never happens but is required for certification? It`s always easy to be negative and locate problems, it`s harder to come up with better ways.
LOL the flight attendents were like GO GO GO! And then there was that one woman going like OMG GTFO! WTF! GO GO YOUR TOO SLOW RUN! YOU FAGGS RUN! Lol OUT OUT! Like..... o.o woah.. anyways amazing evac .. :)
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
He also believes computers make airplanes safer. Sorry, this is again incorrect.
Let's examine the Air France A330 that crashed recently. ACARS messages sent from the airplane indicated numerous failures from COMPUTER systems. They flew through a thunderstorm and most likely took a lightning strike that wiped out the COMPUTERS, including the fly-by-wire systems.
I was never talking about the A330, I was talking about the A380. I'm just saying it is a safety improvement and personally I don't care if you prefer Boeing or Airbus. You think what you want to think.
You do know that the 777 and 787 cant fly without computers either as both are FBW? Btw, the AF 330 had most probarbly notthing to do with lighting, check your facts.
And when you look at the statistics, (as in real facts) you`ll see that advancements, including computer technology DO indeed make flying safer.
@scaremengaviation Retarded in terms of aviation knowledge, eh? Apparently my level of aviation retardedness rendered me an ATP pilot certificate, 2 type ratings, and an A&P mechanic certificate with inspection authorization. To all my fellow retarded aviation colleagues out there, there is a 16 year old boy with the user name "scaremengaviation" (whatever that means) who knows it all. Who knew?
@av8rcaptain My comment was made out of character. And I find it funny that someone with what you have could so easily say that Airbus are junk, and that computers won't help in the event of a crash. But whatever, obviously I didn't know your credentials, and there was no possible way I could have beforehand. I take my comment back.
@scaremengaviation You're a stand-up guy, thanks for the reply. Sorry I snapped at you. I spent 5 years working on Airbuses for a major airline before I got into corporate aviation as a mechanic and eventually a pilot. The Boeings we operated were more reliable and easier to maintain. As for the flight control computers, in my opinion they're scary, even though they have back-up power supplies. I like a mechanical link to my flight controls, either cables or push tubes...not wires.
@av8rcaptain So are you. It's interesting because most, if not all, mechanics seem to prefer Boeing aircraft over Airbus. I'm assuming this would be because all the "Boeing" parts are used, but controlled with computers, thus adding more parts to maintain? Something along the lines of that, but in less simpler terms..
@scaremengaviation You're 16. Just exactly what experience, or knowledge for that matter, do you have to say that 'most, if not all' mechanics prefer Boeing over Airbus? At what airlines? What countries? Every time I read or hear a statement like that, there's always one common denominator, and that's the country of origin of the person saying it. Always an American. Makes you wonder...
@Smoznizjev Age doesn't have a factor, nor should it. You can learn plenty from a certain, popular, forum. Besides that, my comment was directed at av8rcaptain (hence the "@av8rcaptain"). If you'd read my context, I would be agreeing with what he said. And also telling him that most other mechanics I've talked to on YouTube, and that other forum, seem to say that Boeing aircraft are easier to maintain. And if you're going to be national, you're very partial being from Belgium. Bullshit.
@scaremengaviation If the 'certain, popular forum' you refer to is airliners(.)net, I've been a member there for over a decade.
But hey, if your source is from talking to people on youtube (where anybody can, and does, pretend to be whatever they want) and a(.)net (which I also read, and participate in, and where in those 10 years I have seen no clear preference between what manufacturer mechanics prefer), then that's all I need to know really.
@scaremengaviation All of who? The mechanics? As I've said, I read the same forum as you, and I actually know some REAL mechanics. I see no universal preference for either manufacturer. Sure, some prefer Boeing, some Airbus. In many cases, it depends on what they started out on. If they started on Boeing, and switched to Airbus, most will prefer Boeing, not because they're better, but because they're what they're used to. Those who started on Airbus usually prefer it over Boeing, same reason.
@Smoznizjev Why don't you not take my reply out of context. I said "seems to be" after my commentary, thus implying that nothing was absolute but rather opinion from my personal experience, of which you know nothing about. Age has no relevancy in this argument. Nationality, sure it does. But where are you from? Belgium. You seem just as biased as I am. Great platform. Makes you wonder? Yeah, makes me wonder why people like you choose to argue at the person, and not the content.
@scaremengaviation Your 'personal experience' is youtube and an online forum. You've just said that in your first reply. And my nationality doesn't enter into it. You don't see me going around bashing Boeing, do you? If I did, then you'd have a point. I'm simply pointing out how some Americans (luckily a small, yet vocal minority) constantly bashing Airbus seems to have more than just 'technical' origins.
@Smoznizjev Who are you to say whether or not that is legitimate. You're entitled to your opinion, as am I. I'm defending mine, you're attacking mine. You aren't bashing Boeing, but was I bashing Airbus? I think that's a good point. Good job, you used the word "some".
@scaremengaviation Who am I to say whether it's legit? The comments on youtube are about as unreliable as it gets: completely unmoderated, and a complete free for all, and if you read through comments on most videos, not a shining light of either intelligence or maturity. And airliners? As I've said, I read it too, and have since you were learning how to read, and don't see the clear bias you speak of.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Ok, so they evacuated indoors with no fire, no smoke, no bags, no injured people, all in a controlled environment. Remember, most airplanes don't crash inside a hangar.
Think about where the A380 will spend most of its time...OVER THE OCEAN. I'd like to see a night water evacuation in the north Atlantic in 20 foot seas...let me know how that one works out.
Remember the Titanic? Biggest ship ever built, at the time. Too bad most people couldn't get off the damn thing when it went down.
The point is, when they have to ditch this big bastard its gonna be a pain the arse to get all those people out. Not that it would be much easier in any other plane, but this sucker holds half the population of Texas.
Each passenger would have to crawl out 1 by 1 into the inflatable dinghies (1st class passengers first of course) which is gonna take a lot longer than the slide-jumping dummies in this video. Meanwhile the airplane is sinking and everyone in coach goes down with the ship
So...the computer systems are going to make the airplane immune to a crash?? And when it does crash I suppose you think the computers are going to help all the screaming people out of the burning wreckage too huh?
I used to maintain Airbuses and Boeings for a major airline and all I can say is Airbus = junk. The quality is poor, I've seen it and worked on it first hand. The computer systems don't make the airplane safe, they take workload from the pilot. Fly by wire = crash by wire.
I believe that all airplanes, including Boeing and Airbus, are relatively safe.
I don't know if Boeing has had a successful water ditching like the Airbus A320 had in the Hudson, maybe in this situation the fly by wire system saved the plane, crew, and passengers.
@FLY777300 That had nothing to do with the plane it had to do with who was flying it and of how good he was. Most people that have tired for water landings never did it that well. Don't put all the stock in the plane.
deccas1391 believes all Boeings that have tried to land on water failed.
Unfortunately he didn't do his homework...Most recently, in 2002, an Indonesian 737 made a successful water ditching on a river after dual engine flameout. The water in the river was knee-deep. All passengers survived.
First, I'm not your buddy. Secondly, yes I am dissing Airbus. I have worked on them from stem to stern and they are poorly designed, poorly built airplanes. The A380 only proves their severe case of Napolean syndrome. Perhaps they're compensating for something?
There's no such thing as a "perfect" aircraft. They all have their flaws, even Boeings. But I can tell from first hand mechanical experience that Airbus builds a cheap product. If you don't believe me, work on one for yourself
About the buddy thing - I was being sarcastic. Anyway, Americans need to realise there are companies that are equally as good as Boeing, or sometimes better.
Right, so they have 52% part of the global market but they still build poor planes. So you`re saying that the airlines of the world don`t know they are buying crap aircraft?!
And because Airbus designs it's planes so "poorly" they sell more than any other company on earth very year after just 30 years of existence. :D It's a contradiction. Isn't it?
@Smoznizjev "Can you name just one crash that was caused by the fly by wire system to validate your 'fly by wire = crash by wire' accusation?"
The following was taken from an article about an Indian Air Force crash..."Almost two months after its most advanced fighter aircraft crashed in mysterious circumstances killing a pilot, the government has admitted that faults in the Russian origin ‘fly-by-wire’ flight control system led to the Su 30 MKI crash.
when they do an evac test,they should count injured people,babies,passengers w/ disabilities etc.blankets and pillows on the floor will not kill anyone....they should simulate smoke in the plane and play a tape of people crying and screaming or something to send out panic in the cabin so it will be like a real emergency....
davielenake 2 months ago
@davielenake Yes but in a real emergency all doors are able to open
Muracosa 2 weeks ago
Notice!! 2:40-2:43. The Asian Women was yelling "跑、跑、跑、跑起来
"
golfman90 4 months ago 2
@golfman90 Learn german
IVAN1997526RTY 2 months ago
Yer the only injurey was that lady loosing her voice
sameagain2 4 months ago
snellar sneller! hop hop hop! springen springen! so many langwitches
rubikfan1 4 months ago
.... and just one injury LOL
granzukakoko 5 months ago
lol to the asian lady screeming ''GET LOST GET LOST'' at 2:32 and ''OUT OUT OUT'' at 2:39
daindapain1 5 months ago
@daindapain1 She was saying 'Schneller!!! Schneller!!!' It means 'faster faster!!!' and not "out out out' but Raus raus raus' which yea means out.
42JohnnySmith 3 months ago
wow, thats intense, if that was a real life emergency that would be pretty scary.
chap8938 5 months ago
RAUS JUDEN!! RAUS!!!!!!!!!
Paralyzer 6 months ago
2:32 i love it how she just walks around all the seats and is saying SHNELLA SHNELLA HUM HUM HUM HUM!!
sempron67 6 months ago
the injury guy is at 2:55 to 2:57 on the most left slide
bladerstar1 7 months ago
The asian flight attendant really rocked it, BELLASH, BELLASH BELLASH BELLASH
jko12hho 8 months ago
Where is her whip? I would give all flight attendents whipes and spank them out!
kurbiscremesuppe 8 months ago
The one injury must have been at 1:56, when those last 2 are going down and the one eats it.
xygomorphic44 8 months ago
at 2:42
asian attendant was shoutting: PAO, PAO, PAO, PAO KI LAI.
It means: run, run, run, run up IN CHINESE
Lxusi 8 months ago
@Lxusi
No, she wasn't. She was shouting "Raus, raus, raus, raus hier!" ("Out, out, out, out (of) here")
Clearly none of you here understands German...
glykera 8 months ago 12
@glykera I do
tolaz96 5 months ago
@glykera Its Chinese T_Tlll
golfman90 2 months ago
@golfman90
No, it is not...
glykera 2 months ago
@golfman90 it is ar.
golfman90 2 months ago
4 dislikes... they use boat.
jajamay 8 months ago
unbelievable and spectacular
Mamedense 8 months ago
HUman waterfall!
Bartney1994 9 months ago
England foot ball mob roaring in background
octokyle 9 months ago
Looks like the rush for the ikea bloody sale.
vuthead 9 months ago
"oh, the flight attendant 'bing' came on.... wait... thats the seatbelt sign... oh wait, its the evacuate one... MAKE DIFFERENT NOISES!!!"
jacksite2007 9 months ago
Im the 101 liker :)
jacksite2007 9 months ago
OMG! please look at the last flight attendant on the left side from the 2nd floor! lol!!!! i think that, things like that can occurs.... xD (2:55)
javitoh93 10 months ago
@javitoh93 1st floor, the bottom is the 'ground' floor lol
jacksite2007 9 months ago
shaa laaaaaa! shaaa laaaaaa!!!! lol!
javitoh93 10 months ago
I don't think there is an asian flight attendant - I just think the German one who was shouting "raus raus" - out out - was pretty hysterical given the importance of the test.
Laingalang 10 months ago
thumbs up if the asain flight attendent was so funny
MrWscherr 10 months ago
the asian flight attendant was halirious
alexseh9 10 months ago
Wow! The biggest Commercial plane in the world is evacuated for only 78 seconds!
I love this plane :))
Etihad25Phil 11 months ago
schneller scheller schneller
11isdestiny 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
hopa hopa hopp...???? LH has new evacuation commands !!!
36kornel 11 months ago
hopa hopa hopp...???? LH has new evacation commands !!!
36kornel 11 months ago
Epic win Airbus....
sonicfan7 1 year ago
just one injury... take a look at 2:57.... on the left you can see the LUCKY guy hahahahahaha !
tatercito 1 year ago
@joga12341 Because those were the blocked exits.
KathyGriffinlover22 1 year ago
im going to almost cry, looks really fucked up.
didaktus90 1 year ago
Lufthansa Flightattendants did the evacuation. And typical LH the didn't know any commands. They have the worst training ever. And I am speaking from experience. So unprofesional.
gehtdoch75 1 year ago
Comment removed
almeidamd11 1 year ago
listen to the asian lady flight attendent at 2:42 is it me or can you hear her say "oh dear" i can hear it but i just need some1 to verify it !
mcwhizzkid123 1 year ago
Comment removed
MaxMagZitroneneistee 1 year ago
@MaxMagZitroneneistee 1) i didn't even say she was german and she sounds aisian and looks it aswell,2)no she fucking never,3)i don't care what u say ,4)i wasn't even talking to u in the first place, 5)go home lil boy
mcwhizzkid123 1 year ago
thumbs up for the funny asian flight attendant !!
mcwhizzkid123 1 year ago
No real panic, do not smoke. No real ..
eindet 1 year ago
jees it must be a long trip sliding from the top deck... and that Chinese flight attendant..lol she kills me :-) lol
sirArchitect 1 year ago
2:38 say: 跑!跑!跑!跑!跑!跑!跑!跑!跑!~跑前!! HAHA..
EdwardLaiPY 1 year ago
lol "one injury"? what happened?
muffinman2874 1 year ago
@muffinman2874 at 2:56 watch the people that are at the bottom of the left slide from the upper deck.
kylevk 1 year ago
2:32 asian flight attendant WIN.
GET UP GET UP GET UP GET UP!!!!!!
BFMVpwnage5168 1 year ago
What about people in wheelchairs or older people that need assistance or small children,,, I didn't see any ..... Is the Asian flight attendant helping them??? : )
jxpulid 1 year ago 19
@jxpulid Based on the certification the Airbus A380 was certified under the regulations state that of the passengers 40% must be female and 15% must be over 50 and female. 3 dolls are used to represent infants to be carried by passengers. You can't be an employee of the company or taken part in a similar test in 6 months to take part. Also as shown in the video they only get to use half the exits (representing fire and other obstacles) AND have to do it in 90 seconds!!
Laingalang 10 months ago
Comment removed
jajamay 8 months ago
SHE IS NOT ASIAN.
jajamay 8 months ago
Millions to build? The A380's projected development cost was $15 billion!
scaremengaviation 1 year ago
0:54 and 2:36 wrong hangar buddies, that's an Airbus turf!
TLVspotter 1 year ago
2:04 LOL its like the little chime goes off and everybody panics like crazy!!! LMFAO
mboz38 1 year ago
the fact that the flight attendants were FREAKING OUT during a test is not much incentive for me to fly any german airline. let alone an A380
bradporky16 1 year ago
@bradporky16 You'd rather they quietly whispered to the passengers to please leave the plane? Send out written invitations? If this is your idea of freaking out you haven't seen anything yet. What you're seeing here is efficiency at its best: it's dark, nobody can see a thing. So you shout at people to get them out of the plane. And push them if needed. It's an emergency, no time to be nice. Freaking out is screaming while you don't know what you're doing. This here is efficiency.
Smoznizjev 1 year ago
@Smoznizjev i think the flight attendants calmy, but loudly, repeating "exit this way, this way out" or some variation of that would suffice. and as for your comment about me thinking that is freaking out, fuck you. that WAS freaking out. controlled? yes. but freaking out nonetheless. and before you give me some bullshit about how everyone's tough on youtube, look me up next time you're in san diego.
bradporky16 1 year ago
@bradporky16 Are you seriously threatening a person you've never seen before, or ever heard of, on the internet, because he said you haven't seen anything yet if you thought that was freaking out? Wow. Internet tough guys, gotta love 'em...
And they weren't freaking out, but doing their job. And doing a fantastic job. If they were to do as you suggest (calmly say 'exit this way'), it would have taken at least two minutes, as people would have calmly waited their turns, leaving enough space.
Smoznizjev 1 year ago
i didnt catch it.where are gonna end all this people?
gimisektomorf 1 year ago
they look like ants Going out from their colony
vezac 1 year ago
Haha the FA's were funny. And I believe this test is accurate because..
1) half of the exits won't be blocked.
2) an a380 will never have 853 passengers. The typical flight has less than 500.
3) the a380 will never have to evacuate. :)
KBCC3 1 year ago
All I have to say is: WEEEEEEEEE!!!! (Though you would be freaked out if it was real)
TheAirvisionist 1 year ago
Wow nice
JLTVstaff 1 year ago 2
they should have shown the 'one injury' dick waab,and pound him or her,will probably cause people to die in a real crash!!!!cannot stand panicking people....
aligoulou 1 year ago
Id Pannic and scream!
flippers229 1 year ago
omg scarry
EtihadHabbo 1 year ago
I was in that like i jumped b4 it fully inflated and I was the gyr with the injury I broke my arm
DIMATIF 1 year ago
lmao at the last person on the slide on the left at 2:55 ,,, OWNED
razinblazer 1 year ago
XD shnella shnella
Wow that is 1 mad lady
Btw add the pressure make it a 1 min evac
DIMATIF 1 year ago
Comment removed
blue3u 1 year ago
Comment removed
zulurain01 1 year ago
Comment removed
zulurain01 1 year ago
the cabin crew are getting rid of the passengers who didn't pay the airfare! hahaha
jp5995 1 year ago 8
whears the people geting and carrying their bags
LifeSafetySystems 1 year ago
el aereobus es el mejor avion xd
jory5215 2 years ago
The flight attendants are classic. I know this is their job, but they are extra funny in this video. People sitting next to the exits are the most lucky.
BusterBunker 2 years ago
2:40
swakeri 2 years ago 3
lmfao that asian flight attendant made me laugh so hard !!
mcwhizzkid123 2 years ago 28
@mcwhizzkid123 there is no asians... Its tested in switzerland
DIMATIF 1 year ago
@DIMATIF well whatever .
mcwhizzkid123 1 year ago
@mcwhizzkid123 Me tooo! hahahahaha " Chang! Hann !! Lay Channn!!! Chan hannn!!!! " hahaha
1Alborada 1 year ago
@1Alborada lol
mcwhizzkid123 1 year ago
@mcwhizzkid123 She sounded a little like Frau Farbissina from Austin Powers.
DeadRaymanWalking 1 year ago
@DeadRaymanWalking lol
mcwhizzkid123 1 year ago
@DeadRaymanWalking hahahaha
mcwhizzkid123 1 year ago
@mcwhizzkid123 LooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooL
MsCasper2010 1 year ago
@mcwhizzkid123
In Neway47's version of the same video, at exactly 1:23 you can see that this flight attendant is NOT asian.
Carmarthan415 1 year ago
@Carmarthan415 yh anyway!
mcwhizzkid123 1 year ago
@mcwhizzkid123 what the hell is she saying oh dear?
MrWscherr 10 months ago
LMAO!
Im sorry, but I think this was the most hilarious thing ever :P
1037pm 2 years ago
at 2:39 the woman goes mad its hillarious!
0oMilliono0 2 years ago
haha tht was pretty damn funny i LOLed
goldheartagram777 2 years ago
these tests are so flawed. in real emergencies, there can be people with broken bones, who cannot move so fast, debris in the walkway, unstable grounds... they should not just do 1 test that seems 'perfect'. they need to do multiple tests with many different senario's.
Beach01 2 years ago
That's why 1/2 of the exits are blocked and a ninety second deadline given. Usually you will have fewer blocked exits and more than 90 seconds.
zhz212 2 years ago
you don't have more than 90 seconds. you have only 90 seconds ot evacuate an aircraft.
Beach01 2 years ago 2
No what I mean is that an airplane might not explode for 3 minutes or so. And chances are not half of the exits are blocked.
zhz212 2 years ago
Comment removed
swakeri 2 years ago
At 2:33 think I hear that lady yelling shtella
swakeri 2 years ago
She yells in German: "schneller" meaning "faster"
chfreund 2 years ago
Thank you
swakeri 2 years ago
You would never achieve 90 sec in real life.
All those people knew they had to evacuate and the brain was already looking for a way out whether they consciously knew it or not. Wired news did an article reporting how false these tests are.
erlt2000 2 years ago
Then what do you call Air France flight 358 where all the passenger were evacuated in 90 sec and with most slides not working and doors blocked?
planeboy1993 2 years ago 2
I am assuming that the flight attendants were trained to act as if there is a wall of fire coming at them and as if the plane is about to explode.
The aim of the exercise is to prove to the authorities that the plane can be evacuated in case of a real fire or crash landing. Job well done by everybody involved!
I'm looking forward to seeing the same exercise by Boeing for their 787.
solksolksolk 2 years ago
I heard that 33 people got injured and 1 guy broke his leg!
mubd1234 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
god these flight attendance would piss me off. if the guy at 2:25 was yelling at me that close and pushing me into people i would have turned around and punched him in the face, then the lady at 2:40 (which needs to get slapped as well) needs to 1) shutup cuz shes just making the situation worse 2) get laid 3) and stop sounding as if she was on fire.
jerrry13157 2 years ago
wtf is she doing? its like shes hving a panic attack!
greengoblin200 2 years ago
ahaha thats funny
DaVeTheTaliban 2 years ago
jerry13157: You'll think differently when you're stuck on an airplane on fire and there's a passenger blocking an exit and a flight attendant pushes him. In an emergency, flight attendants are there to save your life, not to be friendly :-)
airodyssey 2 years ago 13
@jerrry13157 You are an idiot
wjgmspeedy 1 year ago
@wjgmspeedy get a life rather then watching youtube on christmas / boxing day
jerrry13157 1 year ago
@jerrry13157 Not everyone is christian.
wjgmspeedy 1 year ago
@jerrry13157 Not every christian is that way that you NEED to be with your family on x-mas. My family is just downstairs a mom a dad and a little brother. What's wrong with not going you all your aunts and nieces at x-mas, we hardly know them. Screw them as we live all scatared over europe. Fucking mongloid.
sonicfan7 1 year ago
Why the f was the flight attendants so panicked!!!!
robert0joe 2 years ago
haa they say eight hundred and eighty somthing but i saw someone with the number 1024 ....:S
wildfun96 2 years ago
and just one injury. look at 2:55 male flight attendent to the left.
DudrickStudios 2 years ago
he was ok, he just wanted to do a barrel roll before disembarking
BrendanIsCool 2 years ago
haha
DudrickStudios 2 years ago
it kinda sounds like the flight atendants are panicking and the passangers are soo calm
Coolcharger101 2 years ago
the one at 2:35!
juliMathers 2 years ago
WOW that was a quick evacuation there was like 700 people or more and got everyone out in only 70 sec thats amazing
Coolcharger101 2 years ago
Comment removed
GALLANTDELUXE 2 years ago
This has nothing to do with "AIRBUS". Every passanger plane is tested in the same way as stipulated by the FAA and other governmental bodies. You cannot test every eventuality but this baseline (under 90 seconds) leaves room for problems like you`ve mentioned.
But enlighten us, how would you certificate a procedure that almost never happens but is required for certification? It`s always easy to be negative and locate problems, it`s harder to come up with better ways.
lockstocknl 2 years ago
LOL the flight attendents were like GO GO GO! And then there was that one woman going like OMG GTFO! WTF! GO GO YOUR TOO SLOW RUN! YOU FAGGS RUN! Lol OUT OUT! Like..... o.o woah.. anyways amazing evac .. :)
coolpixer 2 years ago
interesting :)
jonathanroxcp 2 years ago
The flight attendants sound like sims characters. lol
pascuajulius 2 years ago
in real accident people push, hit and fall
reyesq 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
He also believes computers make airplanes safer. Sorry, this is again incorrect.
Let's examine the Air France A330 that crashed recently. ACARS messages sent from the airplane indicated numerous failures from COMPUTER systems. They flew through a thunderstorm and most likely took a lightning strike that wiped out the COMPUTERS, including the fly-by-wire systems.
Are you feeling safer yet???
av8rcaptain 2 years ago
If you don't have computers on an airplane then how will it fly?
FLY777300 2 years ago 3
@FLY777300 Cessna? or Piper cub? its a plane... and no computer...
ComputerHelp007 1 year ago
I was never talking about the A330, I was talking about the A380. I'm just saying it is a safety improvement and personally I don't care if you prefer Boeing or Airbus. You think what you want to think.
deccas1391 2 years ago
You do know that the 777 and 787 cant fly without computers either as both are FBW? Btw, the AF 330 had most probarbly notthing to do with lighting, check your facts.
And when you look at the statistics, (as in real facts) you`ll see that advancements, including computer technology DO indeed make flying safer.
lockstocknl 2 years ago 2
blablabla
7Spronge 2 years ago
How grown up of you....
lockstocknl 2 years ago
so ?
7Spronge 2 years ago
@av8rcaptain For someone who's username is "Aviator Captain" you're pretty retarded in terms of aviation knowledge.
scaremengaviation 1 year ago
@scaremengaviation Retarded in terms of aviation knowledge, eh? Apparently my level of aviation retardedness rendered me an ATP pilot certificate, 2 type ratings, and an A&P mechanic certificate with inspection authorization. To all my fellow retarded aviation colleagues out there, there is a 16 year old boy with the user name "scaremengaviation" (whatever that means) who knows it all. Who knew?
av8rcaptain 1 year ago
@av8rcaptain My comment was made out of character. And I find it funny that someone with what you have could so easily say that Airbus are junk, and that computers won't help in the event of a crash. But whatever, obviously I didn't know your credentials, and there was no possible way I could have beforehand. I take my comment back.
scaremengaviation 1 year ago
@scaremengaviation You're a stand-up guy, thanks for the reply. Sorry I snapped at you. I spent 5 years working on Airbuses for a major airline before I got into corporate aviation as a mechanic and eventually a pilot. The Boeings we operated were more reliable and easier to maintain. As for the flight control computers, in my opinion they're scary, even though they have back-up power supplies. I like a mechanical link to my flight controls, either cables or push tubes...not wires.
av8rcaptain 1 year ago
@av8rcaptain So are you. It's interesting because most, if not all, mechanics seem to prefer Boeing aircraft over Airbus. I'm assuming this would be because all the "Boeing" parts are used, but controlled with computers, thus adding more parts to maintain? Something along the lines of that, but in less simpler terms..
scaremengaviation 1 year ago
@scaremengaviation You're 16. Just exactly what experience, or knowledge for that matter, do you have to say that 'most, if not all' mechanics prefer Boeing over Airbus? At what airlines? What countries? Every time I read or hear a statement like that, there's always one common denominator, and that's the country of origin of the person saying it. Always an American. Makes you wonder...
Smoznizjev 1 year ago
@Smoznizjev Age doesn't have a factor, nor should it. You can learn plenty from a certain, popular, forum. Besides that, my comment was directed at av8rcaptain (hence the "@av8rcaptain"). If you'd read my context, I would be agreeing with what he said. And also telling him that most other mechanics I've talked to on YouTube, and that other forum, seem to say that Boeing aircraft are easier to maintain. And if you're going to be national, you're very partial being from Belgium. Bullshit.
scaremengaviation 1 year ago
@scaremengaviation If the 'certain, popular forum' you refer to is airliners(.)net, I've been a member there for over a decade.
But hey, if your source is from talking to people on youtube (where anybody can, and does, pretend to be whatever they want) and a(.)net (which I also read, and participate in, and where in those 10 years I have seen no clear preference between what manufacturer mechanics prefer), then that's all I need to know really.
Smoznizjev 1 year ago
@Smoznizjev So all of them are pretending? Sure.
scaremengaviation 1 year ago
@scaremengaviation All of who? The mechanics? As I've said, I read the same forum as you, and I actually know some REAL mechanics. I see no universal preference for either manufacturer. Sure, some prefer Boeing, some Airbus. In many cases, it depends on what they started out on. If they started on Boeing, and switched to Airbus, most will prefer Boeing, not because they're better, but because they're what they're used to. Those who started on Airbus usually prefer it over Boeing, same reason.
Smoznizjev 1 year ago
@Smoznizjev Why don't you not take my reply out of context. I said "seems to be" after my commentary, thus implying that nothing was absolute but rather opinion from my personal experience, of which you know nothing about. Age has no relevancy in this argument. Nationality, sure it does. But where are you from? Belgium. You seem just as biased as I am. Great platform. Makes you wonder? Yeah, makes me wonder why people like you choose to argue at the person, and not the content.
scaremengaviation 1 year ago
@scaremengaviation Your 'personal experience' is youtube and an online forum. You've just said that in your first reply. And my nationality doesn't enter into it. You don't see me going around bashing Boeing, do you? If I did, then you'd have a point. I'm simply pointing out how some Americans (luckily a small, yet vocal minority) constantly bashing Airbus seems to have more than just 'technical' origins.
Smoznizjev 1 year ago
@Smoznizjev Who are you to say whether or not that is legitimate. You're entitled to your opinion, as am I. I'm defending mine, you're attacking mine. You aren't bashing Boeing, but was I bashing Airbus? I think that's a good point. Good job, you used the word "some".
scaremengaviation 1 year ago
@scaremengaviation Who am I to say whether it's legit? The comments on youtube are about as unreliable as it gets: completely unmoderated, and a complete free for all, and if you read through comments on most videos, not a shining light of either intelligence or maturity. And airliners? As I've said, I read it too, and have since you were learning how to read, and don't see the clear bias you speak of.
Smoznizjev 1 year ago
I wish mc donalds would move 800 people through in 90 seconds. Damn minimum wage
clof2001 2 years ago
lol
deccas1391 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Ok, so they evacuated indoors with no fire, no smoke, no bags, no injured people, all in a controlled environment. Remember, most airplanes don't crash inside a hangar.
Think about where the A380 will spend most of its time...OVER THE OCEAN. I'd like to see a night water evacuation in the north Atlantic in 20 foot seas...let me know how that one works out.
Remember the Titanic? Biggest ship ever built, at the time. Too bad most people couldn't get off the damn thing when it went down.
av8rcaptain 2 years ago
I believe that all evacuation tests for any airliner are done in a controlled environment.
It is almost impossible for any airliner to be evacuated in 20 foot seas, whether is the A380 or any other airplane.
FLY777300 2 years ago 5
The point is, when they have to ditch this big bastard its gonna be a pain the arse to get all those people out. Not that it would be much easier in any other plane, but this sucker holds half the population of Texas.
Each passenger would have to crawl out 1 by 1 into the inflatable dinghies (1st class passengers first of course) which is gonna take a lot longer than the slide-jumping dummies in this video. Meanwhile the airplane is sinking and everyone in coach goes down with the ship
av8rcaptain 2 years ago
Yeah but the Titanic didn't have as many computers and safety systems as the A380
deccas1391 2 years ago
So...the computer systems are going to make the airplane immune to a crash?? And when it does crash I suppose you think the computers are going to help all the screaming people out of the burning wreckage too huh?
I used to maintain Airbuses and Boeings for a major airline and all I can say is Airbus = junk. The quality is poor, I've seen it and worked on it first hand. The computer systems don't make the airplane safe, they take workload from the pilot. Fly by wire = crash by wire.
av8rcaptain 2 years ago
Comment removed
deccas1391 2 years ago
I believe that all airplanes, including Boeing and Airbus, are relatively safe.
I don't know if Boeing has had a successful water ditching like the Airbus A320 had in the Hudson, maybe in this situation the fly by wire system saved the plane, crew, and passengers.
FLY777300 2 years ago
@FLY777300 That had nothing to do with the plane it had to do with who was flying it and of how good he was. Most people that have tired for water landings never did it that well. Don't put all the stock in the plane.
Epica124 1 year ago
deccas1391 believes all Boeings that have tried to land on water failed.
Unfortunately he didn't do his homework...Most recently, in 2002, an Indonesian 737 made a successful water ditching on a river after dual engine flameout. The water in the river was knee-deep. All passengers survived.
av8rcaptain 2 years ago
Then what caused the flameout? The Airbus on the Hudson lost its engines due to birds, not Airbus' fault
deccas1391 2 years ago
Torrential rain caused the flameout.
By the way...the A321 and the 737-400 have the same engines...CFM56.
Grow up and get a life
av8rcaptain 2 years ago
Buddy, if you're just here to dis Airbus and what they do, I think YOU should get a life and get used to it
deccas1391 2 years ago 3
First, I'm not your buddy. Secondly, yes I am dissing Airbus. I have worked on them from stem to stern and they are poorly designed, poorly built airplanes. The A380 only proves their severe case of Napolean syndrome. Perhaps they're compensating for something?
There's no such thing as a "perfect" aircraft. They all have their flaws, even Boeings. But I can tell from first hand mechanical experience that Airbus builds a cheap product. If you don't believe me, work on one for yourself
av8rcaptain 2 years ago
About the buddy thing - I was being sarcastic. Anyway, Americans need to realise there are companies that are equally as good as Boeing, or sometimes better.
deccas1391 2 years ago
Right, so they have 52% part of the global market but they still build poor planes. So you`re saying that the airlines of the world don`t know they are buying crap aircraft?!
Cheerleaders, such sad people.....
lockstocknl 2 years ago
And because Airbus designs it's planes so "poorly" they sell more than any other company on earth very year after just 30 years of existence. :D It's a contradiction. Isn't it?
olfrygt2007 2 years ago
@av8rcaptain Can you name just one crash that was caused by the fly by wire system to validate your 'fly by wire = crash by wire' accusation?
Smoznizjev 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Smoznizjev "Can you name just one crash that was caused by the fly by wire system to validate your 'fly by wire = crash by wire' accusation?"
The following was taken from an article about an Indian Air Force crash..."Almost two months after its most advanced fighter aircraft crashed in mysterious circumstances killing a pilot, the government has admitted that faults in the Russian origin ‘fly-by-wire’ flight control system led to the Su 30 MKI crash.
Does that answer your question?
av8rcaptain 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Smoznizjev "Can you name just one crash that was caused by the fly by wire system to validate your 'fly by wire = crash by wire' accusation?"
In 2009 an Indian Air Force Sukhoi SU-30 crashed killing the pilot. Cause of the accident..."Failure of the fly-by-wire system.
Question answered.
av8rcaptain 1 year ago
@Smoznizjev Possibly Air France 296, oh wait. This comment was directed at av8rcaptain, wasn't it.
scaremengaviation 1 year ago