I think that the original intention for this incident was to have it crash into the White House or Congress. Bush would have been dictator in a matter of minutes, and the police state that they are trying so hard to get would have been implemented in hours. They're not going to get that 1 world government shit. Over my cold, liberty loving dead body, they still won't.
93 was an inside job. but that doesn't mean this woman is telling the truth. she just seems like she is lieing. but the government is defiantly lieing there was no plane parts and they did pull out a small jet engine the size of a small fighter or private airline.
all the people who refuse to believe any evidence to the contrary believed that govt. would never lie are the same ones who distrust govt when a dem is in power
IDK.... I want to believe her but something tells me she's full of shit. Something about the vague way she tells it. I would never forget one fucking detail. Then she cries right when she was at a critical point in her story? Maybe I'm wrong, but I call bullshit.
There's a little drone RQ-170, that sounds like her description. It's pretty small, although it's possibly newer than 2001, but it's still feasible, as most tech is hidden from us for years before they allow mainstream to know about it.
No way on earth a plane/missile could have gone under those power lines and then pull up, over the trees in the background. Just no way! The lady seems very confused but I'm sure that she isn't sure what she actually saw.
The coward passangers did not take control of the plane. The pathetic ameriKKKan Air Force shot down the plane. Wow, AmeriKKKans really are a bunch of morons. ISLAM will rule ameriKKKa!!!!
She seems dumb and redneck enough to take the money and be quiet and say stupid shit like it flew under the teli poles to confuse truth seekers. U cant believe anything these days, everyone has their hand in the pot
I thought it was shot down. Then where are the bodies? Parts? Nothing. Just a crater. This whole thing was a false flag op. WTC 7 was a controlled demo, you can't deny it.
Eyewitness testimony is, at best, evidence of what the witness believes to have occurred. It may or may not tell what actually happened. The familiar problems of perception, of gauging time, speed, height, weight, of accurate identification of persons accused of crime all contribute to making honest testimony something less than completely credible. - Levin and Cramer’s Problems and Materials on Trial Advocacy
the first thing that came into my mind when she described it was a MQ-9 reaper and its first flight was february 2, 2001 so it was available then. google it
So where are the folks that were supposed to be on Flight 93...they just disappear out of no where....most of them called their familes with alot of detail of what was going on.
@daisyduck0285 google Loose Change and look down to the vids. there is one on the google video site. it's here on youtube also but in parts. the whole vid is on google. but it's answers your question in fine detail. there's eyewitness proof that it landed in cincinnati. but we don't know where the passengers are. strange how no bodies were found here and none have called in to say they're alive. i'll say the govt kidnapped and killed them. after all they did murder those in the towers.
How was building seven implode unless it was rigged to blow several weeks before? The towers went down the same way. I know Larry silverstein got a terrorist insurance policy just a month before. He made 7 billion on the deaths of those people. He is the one who told them to go ahead and pull it. It was an admitted controlled demolition which experts say would take weeks to prepare for a building that size.
This women is retarded. She said the plane was really high up, and she said it looked really white. How can u tell if its that high up? she then said the plane was so low she ducked and turned the radio off. Why? the first thing u do is turn ur radio off. and that niose should have shattered ur windshields it it was that low. ur need some help.
@MegaYeshua33 Tell me something, how do you know if flight 93 ever took place? Did the media tell you that , are you're just regurgitating false info, or are you all knowing? Like I said, neither do phtom planes that don't exist.
Somebody needs her medicine. My wife said to me one time, before going to the mental hospital, "I'm on the Russian swim team!". It's called, "bipolar". I'm completely honest about this, unlike this woman, IMHO.
@bauer444 Or you are. Saying a womans on crack as she calmly and normally tells her story tells me its probably you thats on crack.
Or youre just one of those mental midget pussies unable to understand that a govt could orchestrate something like this. Instead its easier for you to believe the ridiculous official story that some cave dwellers were able to pull this off, unhitched really.
To me, thats someone who seems like they must be on crack.
@MyMaeve I would say that it is defiantly a good possibility that they have color changing camouflage on the TR-3B, cause they have started outfitting troops with similar technologies (not your average troops more like special forces or higher).
They did see fighter jets. The air force was sent to 93 after several phone calls from the plane had said they were hijacked. They were awaiting orders to shoot the plane down if it got too close to DC. The orders were not given yet do to the fact that it was a commercial plane with innocent people on it.
@devoted2potter This was also after the trade centers were hit and possibly the pentagon (im not exactly sure what time the pentagon was hit) so they knew the plane was more than likely heading to a building. The military would have had to interfere. She described the jets perfectly. Ive seen the jets exactly as she described.
She is not lying- I have been to this area many times and they are good people from a small town... who don't just see a fighter JET every day. Come one- and I do believe this plane was shot down- Donald Rumsfeld said so himself as he let it slip..and CBS interview shows the fighter pilots in that area on that day...listen to them..and the other eyewitnesses at least 3 who all say they saw a white fighter jet leave that crash site. You think the gvmnt is going to release all their info?
When the Obama administration announced in December 2009 the deployment of 30,000 new troops in Afghanistan, there was already an increase of attacks by pilotless Predator drones against Taliban and Al Qaeda militants...coin-ky-dink...maybe thats what she saw... maybe the planes that hit the towers were remote control it would make more sense than what the TV says
i was thinking drone or a Cruise missile ,that could only maneuver like that......so did they use one to shoot down 93?......I see jets flying over my home and when its low I look up. and they are HUGE,not the size of a van.
f an AGM-129 ACM cruise missile passed above you in the street, travelling at 800km/h, would you see it clearly? Apparently some people did see something. On September 11th 2001, many eyewitness reports of seeing what appeared to be a jet liner flying upside down over Shanksville PA Could this be what they actually saw?
@michaelmage quite possibly..plus alot of eyewitnesses at the WTC say the planes they saw were not regular planes they quote them looking like millitary planes and there is alot of people saying this
well what they don't tell you is there was a plane which was the way that flight controlers where told the flight was down flying around that area so what she might have seen is this small plane and then only seeing the smoke from the crash of flight 93
Here we go again. LOL All that's missing here is a Rod Serling intro. Hey, did I tell you guys I have little green men from Roswell living in my garage? They promised me as soon as they complete repairs on their saucer they will take me back home with them, where others from their world have already abducted Elvis, JFK Jr, Glenn Miller and Ameila Earhart.
After being a SUCKER for several years,I'm finally seeing the light.Yes,the government is and has been lying to us people for years,even decades.After allowing Kennedy to be killed,both Dems and Repubs have been pretty much controlled.International banks,rich corporations,the military industrial complex,and all the evil world government people are in controll.They have phoney,factious fights between the Dems and Repubs to distract us from the real evil things they plan on doing and are doing.
you guys acting like nazis. shame on you. this lady is still under shock. and you know, if you are seeing something like that, something huge, its too much for your mind. i have no words. if i ask you about something years ago, something special, you will remember 100 percent as it happens?
Holygram techonology has existed since at leat the 50's. It was around 1957 I attended an oil exploration show in which they were displaying all this new wonderous scientific technology.
I was shown a vat of sand and told to put my finger in it. I felt nothing. There was nothing there. What else but a holygram?
Most of the public is in willful ignorance of the public displays of phony signs and miracles being perpetrated against them by by the powers that be.
Homocidal, pedophile Colonel Russell ‘The Canadian Stallion’ Williams seen piloting a white, unmarked Bombardier Challenger CL-604 out of the 5th Wing of the Canadian Forces Base at Goose Bay, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada in the vicinity of Indian Lake near Shanksville, Pennsylvania by Susan McElwain.
@Mandama004 I just read your message, still need to check out a few of the links. I will send my reply to your inbox, Im sure it will be too long for here.
It might have been a Global Hawk but the power of the engine in the Global Hawk seems to make me think otherwise. To compare the Global Hawk engine to the Tomahawk cruise missile is important. The Global Hawk engine produces 31.4 kN thrust while a cruise missile engine only produces about 2.7 kN. The Global Hawk going under the power lines would also pose a problem as this would be a difficult manuveur for any remote pilot. All indications seem to point to a cruise missile.
This sounds like she saw a cruise missile. Most likely a tomahawk, the length is about same as a car (18 feet), the width or wingspan is about 9 feet, and by looking at pictures of some of the missiles, what she describes seems to explain a cruise missile more than any plane. The biggest factor that brought me to this conclusion is the way she said the object went over the trees without moving a single branch. The turbofan engine on a cruise missile would not have enough power to move trees.
her description sounds like the global hawk or predator which is unmanned but remotely guided. really that is what it sounds like to me. as opposed to a cruise missle. description doesnt sound like cruise missle to me. i wish the guy doing the interview could have showd her a picture of a global hawk or predator and see what she said. Also, how about recreating for her what she describes using a video and animation so she could better describe what she saw.
all fake cgi planes were made well in advance of 9/11 and then aired live as "original"...no witnesses EVER saw these planes,they only ever appeared on television.
try reading "divided we stand" written by eric darton in 1999 (pre 9/11) it describes how the towers were progressivley emptied (relocated) of tenants from '93 onwards,with only virtual space later leased (giving the illusion of total occupency).
the empty towers were a financial nightmare,why did silverstein get them so cheap
Sounds to me like she is describing a homebuilt airplane called a "Varieze".....designed by Burt Rutan.....when she said she saw the "spoiler" in front, which could have actually been the Variezes' "canard"......or a drone of some kind .
The idea is the planes were flying remotely though a uplink just like the drones in afganistan are now. And the high jackers were using electrics gear remotely to stear the planes in. That there were no on board high jackers. And this is consistant in the cowardly way a inside , false flag attack would and could be done. For all we know a unknowing pawn in DOD did it thinking he was part of a practice drill. If so I am sure he was killed long ago, either in combate or other.
Remember the french airbus they were show boating at a airshow with, that the pilot throttled down and since he was flying very light( little fuel and no payload) he knew he had airspeed to clear the trees, but when he pulled back his fly by wire computer ignored his imput and the plane flew right into the tree bank and exploded? Same fly by wire systems on the planes hitting the towers would not have allowed the pilots to fly the plane at speed, or manuver as violently. The planes were remote
ObamasLYING.Our gvrnnt is not to be trusted. Here comes another "terrorist attack" to scare uninformed Americans into giving up ALL their remaining freedoms.TheONLY solution is to get rid of our Shadow Government .The Federal Reserve Bank.A privately owned banking cabal that runs the World. TheONLY politicians r on board here r RonPaul&Dennis Kucinich.See Loose Change/Fiat Empire on utube. Read Secrets of the Federal Reserve Creature from Jeckyll Island, Watch The Obama Deception movie.
@mgrealdeals here here! Except America is too preoccupied with how many boob jobs Heidi Montag gets and how much kim kardashian spent on her wedding to ever realize the harsh truths of our current situation. Jesus, WAKE UP AMERICA!!!
Our Gov. is full of shit and stupid Americans eat it up. The "news" that u watch on the networks and cable stations are owned by the very people who plan all these wars and "terror attacks"..You think you will hear anything other than the party line?
Wake Up.
Watch: The Obama Deception, Fiat Empire, Inside Job, Loose Change,Fog of War
Read Secrets of the Federal Reserve by Eustace Mullins
Read : The Creature From Jeckyll Island by Griffin
Yes, the more telling question is why anyone would think a single witness proves anything beyond all shadow of a doubt. It might be OK if this were really a strong witnesses. But clearly she's weak; she's been influenced by e-mails telling her it was a missile; and she didn't remember hearing a crash until two days later.
Some proof. That's 9/11 truth for you - not understanding the nature of evidence, cherrypicking a select witness who stand in isolation to the other witnesses.
Clearly a hysterical lady who doesn't know what she saw. She admits that she didn't hear it crash. This lady needs to take some medication, and then rest. She is saw something that scared her, and now she's confused. Sad.
as u can see flight 93 the video was faked it is not real it got faked if u want to see on ur own here is the link --->Proof that 9/11 flight 93 did not crash at Shanksville
if u think it crashed in shanksville WERE ARE THE PLANE PARTS AVIOUSLY THERE ARE NO PLANE PARTS SO THE PLANE DID NOT CRASH IN SHANKSVILLE tell me what u think ?
No evidence at all of plane crash at Shankesville (except planted)
No evidence at all of plane crash at WTC (except planted)
No evidence at all of plane crash at Pentagon (except planted)
9/11 was a complete HOAX! "Live" TV fakery, constant propaganda and the shock-and-awe campaign by OUR Government against the American people enabled the Rise of Fascism in this country under Bush and it continues and expands under Obama!
@apatriotofusa No planes? Then how come planes crashed into the towers? There were people there. I know people who were in New York at the time. They saw it. No hijackers? The list of people who got on the airplanes is well known. It is shows in virtually every 9/11 video. Those hijackers were real people. Osama, himself, admitted that they crashed the planes into the towers so we suffer like they do. Even Kalishek Muhammad admitted that he masterminded the whole 9/11 plot. It was no hoax.
@Hildron101010 NO PLANES crashed into the towers. 9/11 WAS A COMPLETE HOAX. Of course the list of hijackers is "well known"...the Ministry of Propaganda showedtheir faces 24/7 for months....total propaganda! At least Half of them are still alive in the ME! The OBL confession tape has been proven a CIA hoax! OBL has stated he had NOTHING to do with it! The "mastermind" confessed after being waterboarded 183 times! I would confess to 9/11 after that! You need to wake up pal.......
@apatriotofusa Why do I need to wake up? You said no planes crashed into the towers. If so, how come there was video footage of the planes crashing into the towers. I know people who were there when it happened. They saw it.
@Hildron101010 No offense to you personally, but you are deaf, dumb and blind ignorant regarding your knowledge of the FACTS of 9/11. But it's not your fault. You are a victim of the mass-propaganda campaign that has been waged on the American people for DECADES. They just put it into overdrive since 9/11. The level of technology used on 9/11 is mind-boggling. Holograms, orbs, sophisticated UAV's and other alien elements. Planes were added after the fact by CGI. LIve reporters saw NOTHING .
@apatriotofusa I don't believe a single word you say for a second. I know people who were there. They saw the planes hit. You can't just animate something into real life. They were there. Why would we kill 3000 of our own people and create hundreds of millions of dollars of damages?
@Hildron101010 THAT is the question! The answer is threefold: (1) The pretext they needed to sway public opinion for an invasion of the ME. (2) To use this as the pretext for extablishing an Orwellian Control System (The Dept of Fatherland Securtity, the NSA and the TSA). (3) To use this as the pretext for incrementally taking away every right we have left, while simultaneously bankrupting the nation so it can be absorbed by the NWO Mafia Banksters who will impose AUSTERITY. End of lesson.....
@Hildron101010...I know it's hard to fathom, but the Bankers, who controls all that u see, have been doing this for along time. Human lives mean nothing to these people, and when your that powerful, it corrupts. They create false panic to move their agenda...such as this, then tell u it's terrorism(made up) then that gives them reason for war. the U.S need a loan from the big bank, bankers prosper off of war, or any conflict. If I control your money, I control U....Please wake up!!
@apatriotofusa Live reporters saw nothing? Tell that to WB11, CNN, Fox News, Fox News 5, and the other stations that were live on the scene you fucking moron.
@DKaijuGomoMan The video shown in the new studio, and called "live" , had already been digitally altered before anyone saw it on TV. All the "news" stations were showing the CGI versions to you and the rest of America. They could have shown you ANYTHING, told you it was a live broadcast, and you would not know the difference. People believe what they see on television. Which is sickeningly pathetic.
@apatriotofusa Uhm..? Then how do you explain their reaction... How do you explain how they explain what happened?? The only thing wrong is a simple time delay. God damn your stupid. If they could tell me anything and tell me it was a live broadcast and it wouldn't be, then how could you explain that it was aired SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 AT AROUND 8:46 A.M.!?!? The next day they were showing footage that was brought in from people recording it. Can you think about what your saying? Cuz it's annoying.
@Hildron101010 Have you ever heard of the Ghostplane Theory? A man took a shot of the WTC and made a video so it looked exactly like the rest did. Another guy animated the commonly known vids of the south tower getting hit. He points out how it seemed to have a different flight pattern for ever plane that hit. On the vid of the first tower getting hit, the shadow hits the impact zone before the plane, then passes it.
@Hildron101010 You're the living proof of how dumb and ignorant people can be. There are a lot of story's (conspiracy theories if you will) about 9/11, but we can absolutely be 100% sure that the official 9/11 commission report is a bunch of bullshit. Just as @apatriotofusa said to you, wake up buddy! There's no use for you to keep yourself stupid and blind. You've got internet, so use it! Don't get me wrong it's all for the best. Just want the truth out there. If there are any truths left......
@YGoMeZF I'm not going to bother to drag this argument much further because all of the conspiracy proof is nothing. You can't prove it didn't happen any better than anyone can prove it did happen.
@Hildron101010 I don't have to prove it. Others already did. At least the official story is bullshit, if you believe they told us the truth, you've got another thing coming bro.
Conspiracy proof is nothing? Then why do people get killed over this? Why is there so many PROOF on these conspiracy's? There have been secret societies for a long long time, there still are.
Never the less it's still your choice what to believe. I'm just hoping for you it isn't to late!
@apatriotofusa I'm not saying you're wrong at all, but I just have one question, if there weren't any planes, how come there were planes? Hundreds of thousands of people saw them in the city. I even know one person who was there. It was all over TV too, it can't be fake generated that fast by CG or any other method.
@Hildron101010 The technology used against the American people on 9/11 is beyond most people's imagination. The already ridiculous story of 19 Islamic hijackers defeating the entire North American Defense Network with boxcutters, becomes even more ludicrous when you realize that hundreds of orbs, UAV's and other alien-looking craft were flying all around the WTC and the Pentagon on 9/11....Where have you been for the last 10 years.......? Watching CNN? You won't get any truth there.....
@apatriotofusa I understand that the technology to fake it could be better over sources such as the news, but hundreds of thousands of people witnessed it. The planes crashed right there, people saw it, there's no denying it.
@Hildron101010 There's no denying it? OK, first of all it is NOT POSSIBLE for a 767 to crash THROUGH a building. It is even MORE IMPOSSIBLE for a 767 to crash through a building with it's NOSECONE INTACT. Also, NOT POSSIBLE for jet fuel (kerosene) to MELT STEEL. Also NOT POSSIBLE that the Pentagon plane "vaporized". NOT POSSIBLE. Also NOT POSSIBLE that the Shankesville plane "vaporized" on impact! NOT POSSIBLE. Also most (if not all) of the "witnesses" on TV were PAID ACTORS! No denying? I deny.
@apatriotofusa How old are you? I don't know if you have that much knowledge of physics. Of course it's possible. It melted the steal because the impact destroyed the fire-proofing. Temperatures get extremely high after fueled by jet fuel for so long. Also, the plain didn't completely vaporize at Shanksville. There were pieces of it still visible. But it is still possible to do such a thing. It crashed at over 580 MPH, in solid ground, and it was full of jet fuel. That's enough to burn anything.
@Hildron101010 If you must know, I'm 54 and have been a mechanical engineer for 26 years. You on the other hand are fairly ignorant. Jet fuel (a hydrocarbon) CANNOT reach a sufficiently high temperature to melt steel. Again, NOT POSSIBLE. 767's utilize Pratt and Whitney (Rolls Royce) titanium engines. IMPOSSIBLE TO DESTROY! They would have been recovered if they were there. They weren't. You have to face the truth.....you and every other person in America WAS LIED TO AND PLAYED FOR A FOOL.
@apatriotofusa Impossible to destroy? I don't think anything is impossible to destroy. In fact, I know a guy personally who works for a plane engine company. I'm sure he can tell me pretty easily what's true. Someone like you shouldn't be wasting their time on the Internet spreading this crap.
@apatriotofusa Sorry, ignore my steel type-o. But I also must mention that you completely over-looked the fact of the impact, and removal of fire proofing. Not all of the steel needs to be melted. Towers at high heights sway. That, plus weight of a collapsing building, plus hi temperatures, plus the impact damaging a large part of a building, is way more than enough to bring it down.
@apatriotofusa Plus the steel wasn't melted, it was weakened by the heat. The melting temperature is higher than the theoretical max burning temp of the fuel, but it's close enough to make it weaken, and then buckle. Not to mention it was already damaged by the impact and all of the weight it was holding up.
@apatriotofusa You tell me that, yet you still say there were no planes. Aside from public broadcasts, hundreds of thousands of people saw it. Ask everyone who was in New York that day. If you've got the extreme amount of time to do that. I'm sure they'll say they saw it.
@Hildron101010 I thought we were done.....Look, stop regurgitating and defending the official story and do some honest research.....use your brain. Reach your own conclusions. If you do honest research, there is no other answer than the official story is a LIE. Now go do your homework........
@brandontheruler11 There weren't any planes on 9/11.......none at all......no hijackers either. If you really want to see some bizarre truth about 9/11, check out my videos. But don't blame me if you crap your pants...
@apatriotofusa i understand what u saying i believe u on that and i saw ur video and i know all about cloaking so what hit the towers and what about ppl who took video and my 2nd cousin who was on the damn plane where is she
@brandontheruler11 Hey, I wish I had all the answers for you.....I've just been trying to put the pieces together for the last 8 years, and the picture is looking very bizarre indeed. TV fakery has been proven, as far as at-home viewers are concerned. As for the people who actually "saw" the planes, the multitude of orbs, UAV's and the technology of these aliens, is so advanced beyond ours that holograms would be child's pla yand seems probable. As for what turned the WTC to dust? Not jet fuel.
@apatriotofusa OMG THIS IS THE FUNNIEST PIECE OF SHIT I'VE READ EVER HAVING TO DEAL WITH 9/11!!!
Thanks for making my Day.
Anyhow, Your are just simply retarded to believe that!!! MY GOD I am really actually disappointed in you for believing this. Please get a brain sometime along with the 12 morons who liked your comment.
@DKaijuGomoMan 12 morons? I think not. More like a jury of my peers. I have been aquitted. And you are guilty of nothing more than pure ignorance. It's not your fault. So you are free to go on believing in your dream world. After all, it's not fair to convict someone when that person HAS NO IDEA WHAT IS GOING ON........
@DKaijuGomoMan You sir, have no business talking about "opened eyes".....you are a blind man, in a dark room, looking for a black cat, that someone on TV told you was in there.....
@apatriotofusa Oh.? Then explain to me how there is NO evidence of a plane crash at the WTC and the Pentagon!!! God damn do you know how much footage there is of the plane hitting the second tower??? My lord your dumb and you call me blind. You must be blind and deaf.
@DKaijuGomoMan If you analyze that footage, instead of blindly accepting what you're fed, you will see the "planes" are computer-generated images. You will see that there was NEVER any plane at the WTC or the Pentagon. However, the same analysis of that footage reveals hundreds of alien-looking orbs and other craft flying all over the place on 9/11.
I don't think these ultra-sophisticated orbs and UAV's belong to Al Queda..........do you?
Oh, sorry.....I forgot. You don't know shit do you?
@apatriotofusa Alien-looking Orbs? Try some police choppers. I never knew holographs can forge a crater that fits the exact shape-size of the planes that flew into it. Also didn't know that the engines, wheels, and other parts of the plane would be all over the ground from the collusion with the building from a holograph. You honestly think that the Government has been hiding this kind of technology? Shows you don't think too much. I think your the one who doesn't know shit.
I think that the original intention for this incident was to have it crash into the White House or Congress. Bush would have been dictator in a matter of minutes, and the police state that they are trying so hard to get would have been implemented in hours. They're not going to get that 1 world government shit. Over my cold, liberty loving dead body, they still won't.
EvanesEmperor 1 week ago
Cruise missle maybe?
prosperitygc 1 week ago
Flight 93 travelled 8 miles leaving debris caused by a bomb or shot I think this might be a second missile
ortafunk 1 week ago
93 was an inside job. but that doesn't mean this woman is telling the truth. she just seems like she is lieing. but the government is defiantly lieing there was no plane parts and they did pull out a small jet engine the size of a small fighter or private airline.
javierst1r 2 weeks ago
all the people who refuse to believe any evidence to the contrary believed that govt. would never lie are the same ones who distrust govt when a dem is in power
210daved1 2 weeks ago
Under the wires and over the trees?!!!
Nothing on earth can pull that kind of flying off........fake video
CameltoeJuice 3 weeks ago
IDK.... I want to believe her but something tells me she's full of shit. Something about the vague way she tells it. I would never forget one fucking detail. Then she cries right when she was at a critical point in her story? Maybe I'm wrong, but I call bullshit.
2eelShmeal 1 month ago
this woman is unreliable as a witness... shes completely nuts
Seigu007 1 month ago
There's a little drone RQ-170, that sounds like her description. It's pretty small, although it's possibly newer than 2001, but it's still feasible, as most tech is hidden from us for years before they allow mainstream to know about it.
Fesheca 1 month ago in playlist FLIGHT 93
could someone post the history channel version in the video responses
sprtn0117brice 1 month ago
maybe it was an unmanned predator drone
sprtn0117brice 1 month ago
a fairy story
=yuC_4mGTs98&feature=channel_video_title
voodoowichdoctor 1 month ago
No way on earth a plane/missile could have gone under those power lines and then pull up, over the trees in the background. Just no way! The lady seems very confused but I'm sure that she isn't sure what she actually saw.
Bbendfender 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
the government won't let me move my gold across national boundaries. Look insurancefor2012.c om
pwolfe1987 2 months ago
there is no jet as small as a minivan. Fighter jets are allot bigger then they look. I think it was much farther then she believes.
MegaYeshua33 2 months ago
Sounds like she is describing a drone-type aircraft. Does a drone have a self destruct device built in?
truthinvideos 2 months ago in playlist More videos from Terrorcell2
Scary.
Really, really scary.
4B5PR1T20R 3 months ago
The coward passangers did not take control of the plane. The pathetic ameriKKKan Air Force shot down the plane. Wow, AmeriKKKans really are a bunch of morons. ISLAM will rule ameriKKKa!!!!
Muhammad6531 3 months ago
@Muhammad6531 There never was a plane in the first place you idiot.
warfossil 2 months ago
She seems dumb and redneck enough to take the money and be quiet and say stupid shit like it flew under the teli poles to confuse truth seekers. U cant believe anything these days, everyone has their hand in the pot
E30m3EvoVIIIMR 3 months ago
The more she describes the plane she saw; the more it sounds identical to drones used by the military for operations in the Middle East.
Travis25601 3 months ago in playlist More videos from Terrorcell2
This has been flagged as spam show
I wonder if she could have seen a drone.
Travis25601 3 months ago in playlist More videos from Terrorcell2
why has this happen without punishment and what happen 2 the bodies wtf
seoulkidd1 3 months ago
Wow! 911 was the work of aliens!
embpic 3 months ago
I thought it was shot down. Then where are the bodies? Parts? Nothing. Just a crater. This whole thing was a false flag op. WTC 7 was a controlled demo, you can't deny it.
AzazelsRevenge 3 months ago 3
I think shes a little CRAZY!
BigDH28 3 months ago
Question: Is she still alive? probably not for long
VIKING33NY 3 months ago
Good stuff folks and the ROOSTER in the background concurs!!
JohnNiemsMusic 4 months ago
Eyewitness testimony is, at best, evidence of what the witness believes to have occurred. It may or may not tell what actually happened. The familiar problems of perception, of gauging time, speed, height, weight, of accurate identification of persons accused of crime all contribute to making honest testimony something less than completely credible. - Levin and Cramer’s Problems and Materials on Trial Advocacy
crowtservo 4 months ago
the first thing that came into my mind when she described it was a MQ-9 reaper and its first flight was february 2, 2001 so it was available then. google it
FlavorousWhale 4 months ago
So where are the folks that were supposed to be on Flight 93...they just disappear out of no where....most of them called their familes with alot of detail of what was going on.
daisyduck0285 4 months ago
@daisyduck0285 google Loose Change and look down to the vids. there is one on the google video site. it's here on youtube also but in parts. the whole vid is on google. but it's answers your question in fine detail. there's eyewitness proof that it landed in cincinnati. but we don't know where the passengers are. strange how no bodies were found here and none have called in to say they're alive. i'll say the govt kidnapped and killed them. after all they did murder those in the towers.
WCherokeeW 3 months ago 3
sounds like a cruise missile
alderete74 4 months ago in playlist More videos from Terrorcell2
ooo please you tube... stop manipulating number of views.... clip is here from 2007 and has a very important message!!!!
baltic1986 4 months ago
How was building seven implode unless it was rigged to blow several weeks before? The towers went down the same way. I know Larry silverstein got a terrorist insurance policy just a month before. He made 7 billion on the deaths of those people. He is the one who told them to go ahead and pull it. It was an admitted controlled demolition which experts say would take weeks to prepare for a building that size.
eysofastrnjr 4 months ago
@eysofastrnjr what I have ear that some body took kare of floor 7 and they start doing from a long timr in advance
pancho1071 3 months ago
This women is retarded. She said the plane was really high up, and she said it looked really white. How can u tell if its that high up? she then said the plane was so low she ducked and turned the radio off. Why? the first thing u do is turn ur radio off. and that niose should have shattered ur windshields it it was that low. ur need some help.
cmaszerowski 4 months ago
@cmaszerowski At subsonic speed, it won't shatter windows. I say Cruise Missile, with a warhead.
jackpontiac52 2 months ago
@jackpontiac52 cruise missile don't do barrel rolls
MegaYeshua33 2 months ago
@MegaYeshua33 neither do phantom planes that don't exist.
warfossil 2 months ago
@warfossil But real planes like flight 93 do
MegaYeshua33 2 months ago
@MegaYeshua33 Tell me something, how do you know if flight 93 ever took place? Did the media tell you that , are you're just regurgitating false info, or are you all knowing? Like I said, neither do phtom planes that don't exist.
warfossil 2 months ago
This woman is obviously mentally ill. DUH.
radconserv86 4 months ago
Somebody needs her medicine. My wife said to me one time, before going to the mental hospital, "I'm on the Russian swim team!". It's called, "bipolar". I'm completely honest about this, unlike this woman, IMHO.
radconserv86 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
megamogx 4 months ago
think the TR3B Aurora dropped a bom then flew off.... triangle, no rivets, smooth... the way it moved...
Haasenpad 4 months ago
this broad is on crack
bauer444 4 months ago
@bauer444 Or you are. Saying a womans on crack as she calmly and normally tells her story tells me its probably you thats on crack.
Or youre just one of those mental midget pussies unable to understand that a govt could orchestrate something like this. Instead its easier for you to believe the ridiculous official story that some cave dwellers were able to pull this off, unhitched really.
To me, thats someone who seems like they must be on crack.
thatstheguy07 4 months ago
what this woman is talking about is a TR-3B. Seriously google it and it is the first picture.
villay007 4 months ago 11
@villay007 She says it was white . . . I saw one that was black . . . are they able to change color for camoflage?
MyMaeve 4 months ago
@MyMaeve I would say that it is defiantly a good possibility that they have color changing camouflage on the TR-3B, cause they have started outfitting troops with similar technologies (not your average troops more like special forces or higher).
villay007 4 months ago
@villay007 yes, exactly, or another vehicle similar in NATURE by the manuever's that she claims. I do believe her..period, she is being truthful.
0771mark 3 months ago
@villay007 A tr 3b is allot bigger then a minivan
MegaYeshua33 2 months ago
They did see fighter jets. The air force was sent to 93 after several phone calls from the plane had said they were hijacked. They were awaiting orders to shoot the plane down if it got too close to DC. The orders were not given yet do to the fact that it was a commercial plane with innocent people on it.
devoted2potter 4 months ago
@devoted2potter This was also after the trade centers were hit and possibly the pentagon (im not exactly sure what time the pentagon was hit) so they knew the plane was more than likely heading to a building. The military would have had to interfere. She described the jets perfectly. Ive seen the jets exactly as she described.
devoted2potter 4 months ago
@devoted2potter phone calls from a plane were not possible in 2001. Those calls were faked.
Mark Bingham supposedly called his mother and said "Hi mom its me, mark bingham. You believe me, dont you?"
Bullshit. Everything about 9/11's official story is complete bullshit,.
thatstheguy07 4 months ago
Maybe this one?
Boeing_AGM-86B USAF
Tritonium2k7 4 months ago
She is not lying- I have been to this area many times and they are good people from a small town... who don't just see a fighter JET every day. Come one- and I do believe this plane was shot down- Donald Rumsfeld said so himself as he let it slip..and CBS interview shows the fighter pilots in that area on that day...listen to them..and the other eyewitnesses at least 3 who all say they saw a white fighter jet leave that crash site. You think the gvmnt is going to release all their info?
zebrazoo1 4 months ago
UFO
ThaLaoGuy 4 months ago
Comment removed
mikelyles1959 4 months ago
Kids, don't do drugs.
bigboyhotstuff 4 months ago 2
beyond naivety.
Beazley66 4 months ago
When the Obama administration announced in December 2009 the deployment of 30,000 new troops in Afghanistan, there was already an increase of attacks by pilotless Predator drones against Taliban and Al Qaeda militants...coin-ky-dink...maybe thats what she saw... maybe the planes that hit the towers were remote control it would make more sense than what the TV says
julieshie 4 months ago
yup she is lying
MrWeatherman10 4 months ago in playlist More videos from Terrorcell2
lmao , she lying !
MackenzieeSoPretty96 4 months ago
i was thinking drone or a Cruise missile ,that could only maneuver like that......so did they use one to shoot down 93?......I see jets flying over my home and when its low I look up. and they are HUGE,not the size of a van.
jeepers2655 4 months ago
f an AGM-129 ACM cruise missile passed above you in the street, travelling at 800km/h, would you see it clearly? Apparently some people did see something. On September 11th 2001, many eyewitness reports of seeing what appeared to be a jet liner flying upside down over Shanksville PA Could this be what they actually saw?
/watch?v=RxXCIntpts4
TyroneSandalphon 4 months ago
And when they said the plane hit there was no Shadoq on the grown and if there was a real plane you could of saw the shadow.
lilgr33nie 4 months ago
7:27 reminds me of classic chembombers - "white and shiny"
Silberhorter 4 months ago
So was this a drone??
michaelmage 4 months ago
@michaelmage Yes, I think so. What she describes fits exactly to a flight behaviour of a drone.
webwombel 4 months ago
@michaelmage quite possibly..plus alot of eyewitnesses at the WTC say the planes they saw were not regular planes they quote them looking like millitary planes and there is alot of people saying this
julieshie 4 months ago
It's funny that conspiracy theorists are still watching this nonsense. Wake up guys and lay off the pot!
chillcrazyman 4 months ago
@chillcrazyman Your a good lil lamb aren't you. Silly sheep.
cheater87 4 months ago
@chillcrazyman lay off the naivety
julieshie 4 months ago
I THOUGHT THIS WAS GOING TO BE A INTERVIEW I WAS INTERESTED IN SEEING - BUT ITS NOT ITS JUST A CONSPIRACY THEORY Ô¿Ô
ACEOO8 4 months ago
@ACEOO8 its an interview with a witness if you dont like what you hear thats another thing!!
eltrailerodedgo 4 months ago
well what they don't tell you is there was a plane which was the way that flight controlers where told the flight was down flying around that area so what she might have seen is this small plane and then only seeing the smoke from the crash of flight 93
Drummer1Bodhran1 4 months ago
Here we go again. LOL All that's missing here is a Rod Serling intro. Hey, did I tell you guys I have little green men from Roswell living in my garage? They promised me as soon as they complete repairs on their saucer they will take me back home with them, where others from their world have already abducted Elvis, JFK Jr, Glenn Miller and Ameila Earhart.
Tiberius0001 5 months ago
After being a SUCKER for several years,I'm finally seeing the light.Yes,the government is and has been lying to us people for years,even decades.After allowing Kennedy to be killed,both Dems and Repubs have been pretty much controlled.International banks,rich corporations,the military industrial complex,and all the evil world government people are in controll.They have phoney,factious fights between the Dems and Repubs to distract us from the real evil things they plan on doing and are doing.
1954crc 5 months ago
I was searching for the street on google street view where they were talking from 3 min to the rest. I could not find it. Some help?
forbes923 5 months ago
I'm so happy the people that believe 9/11 was faked have no money and no real power or credibility in the world.
tinangil21 5 months ago
She said it was not much bigger than her van. You need to listen to the interview
again please.
agora1955 5 months ago
you guys acting like nazis. shame on you. this lady is still under shock. and you know, if you are seeing something like that, something huge, its too much for your mind. i have no words. if i ask you about something years ago, something special, you will remember 100 percent as it happens?
loufo 5 months ago
great video, great research. thanks for posting.
anthonyc31 5 months ago
Holygram techonology has existed since at leat the 50's. It was around 1957 I attended an oil exploration show in which they were displaying all this new wonderous scientific technology.
I was shown a vat of sand and told to put my finger in it. I felt nothing. There was nothing there. What else but a holygram?
Most of the public is in willful ignorance of the public displays of phony signs and miracles being perpetrated against them by by the powers that be.
glipzik 5 months ago
A plane would shake the leaves flying so low. It was a holygram.
glipzik 5 months ago
What she is describing sounds like a remote controlled drone missile.
the maneuvers it took show plainly it was doing flight changes a passenger plane could not possibly do.
Also it was white and moulded in one piece with no markings.
Look at what the US milatary use.It should show clearly ones of these.
Just adding more FACTS to the unbeliveable LIES we were told what went on that day.
LOOK at the EVIDENCE people.It's stacked up against the 'official' story(theory)'!
paymydues 5 months ago
What she is describing sounds like a remote controlled drone missile.
the maneuvers it took show plainly it was doing flight changes a passenger plane could not possibly do.
Also t was white and woulded in one piece with no markings.
Look at what the US milatary use.It should show clearly ones of these.
Just adding more FACTS to the unbeliveable LIES we were told what went on that day.
LOOK at the EVIDENCE people.It's stacked up against the 'official' story(theory)'!
paymydues 5 months ago
Holy Hillary's Quweef, there are some dumb people on this planet... no wonder the aliens want to pour bleach over the whole place?
BuckworthJackson 5 months ago
is she describing a drone?
divanola 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Here's the picture of the Bombardier Challenger CL-604:
h t t p : // w w w . airteamimages . com /pics /116 /116896_big.jpg
OperationMockingbird 5 months ago
Homocidal, pedophile Colonel Russell ‘The Canadian Stallion’ Williams seen piloting a white, unmarked Bombardier Challenger CL-604 out of the 5th Wing of the Canadian Forces Base at Goose Bay, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada in the vicinity of Indian Lake near Shanksville, Pennsylvania by Susan McElwain.
OperationMockingbird 5 months ago
why couldnt the eyewitness be a military expert, or someone who knows something about planes? i think a racoon would be a more reliable source
ACERNST22 6 months ago
i am
NOSKTeam 6 months ago
yo
NOSKTeam 6 months ago
Comment removed
DKaijuGomoMan 6 months ago
LOL...are some of you people fucking high? 9/11 was a hoax? Really? Your going to stick with that bullshit story?
pitt15220 6 months ago
@pitt15220 would you like me to show you numerous amounts of evidence that it was an inside job? I'd be happy to.
Mandama004 6 months ago
@Mandama004 Actually, yes I would. PROVE to me that flight 93 didnt crash in PA.
pitt15220 6 months ago
@pitt15220 check your inbox. It will probably take at least an hour to go through.
Mandama004 6 months ago
@pitt15220 one thing I left out...
Check out Google Earth at the crash site. You can see where the "wing shaped" hole is where the plane crashed.
Now, go back in time with Google Earth to 1994.
The hole is still there.
Mandama004 6 months ago
@Mandama004 I just read your message, still need to check out a few of the links. I will send my reply to your inbox, Im sure it will be too long for here.
pitt15220 6 months ago
uav
GibsonYui 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Watch: War By Deception 2011 NOW!
hailtotheking324 6 months ago
It might have been a Global Hawk but the power of the engine in the Global Hawk seems to make me think otherwise. To compare the Global Hawk engine to the Tomahawk cruise missile is important. The Global Hawk engine produces 31.4 kN thrust while a cruise missile engine only produces about 2.7 kN. The Global Hawk going under the power lines would also pose a problem as this would be a difficult manuveur for any remote pilot. All indications seem to point to a cruise missile.
herdropnuggets 7 months ago
This sounds like she saw a cruise missile. Most likely a tomahawk, the length is about same as a car (18 feet), the width or wingspan is about 9 feet, and by looking at pictures of some of the missiles, what she describes seems to explain a cruise missile more than any plane. The biggest factor that brought me to this conclusion is the way she said the object went over the trees without moving a single branch. The turbofan engine on a cruise missile would not have enough power to move trees.
herdropnuggets 7 months ago
her description sounds like the global hawk or predator which is unmanned but remotely guided. really that is what it sounds like to me. as opposed to a cruise missle. description doesnt sound like cruise missle to me. i wish the guy doing the interview could have showd her a picture of a global hawk or predator and see what she said. Also, how about recreating for her what she describes using a video and animation so she could better describe what she saw.
7digitalSunday 7 months ago
all fake cgi planes were made well in advance of 9/11 and then aired live as "original"...no witnesses EVER saw these planes,they only ever appeared on television.
try reading "divided we stand" written by eric darton in 1999 (pre 9/11) it describes how the towers were progressivley emptied (relocated) of tenants from '93 onwards,with only virtual space later leased (giving the illusion of total occupency).
the empty towers were a financial nightmare,why did silverstein get them so cheap
cartoonplanes 8 months ago
Near the end of WWII the US used drones to attack Japanese hiding in caves. The openings were between 20 and 30 ft.
oldman66able 8 months ago
Sounds to me like she is describing a homebuilt airplane called a "Varieze".....designed by Burt Rutan.....when she said she saw the "spoiler" in front, which could have actually been the Variezes' "canard"......or a drone of some kind .
jhhwingnut 8 months ago
The idea is the planes were flying remotely though a uplink just like the drones in afganistan are now. And the high jackers were using electrics gear remotely to stear the planes in. That there were no on board high jackers. And this is consistant in the cowardly way a inside , false flag attack would and could be done. For all we know a unknowing pawn in DOD did it thinking he was part of a practice drill. If so I am sure he was killed long ago, either in combate or other.
ObsenityofAtomicTech 8 months ago
Remember the french airbus they were show boating at a airshow with, that the pilot throttled down and since he was flying very light( little fuel and no payload) he knew he had airspeed to clear the trees, but when he pulled back his fly by wire computer ignored his imput and the plane flew right into the tree bank and exploded? Same fly by wire systems on the planes hitting the towers would not have allowed the pilots to fly the plane at speed, or manuver as violently. The planes were remote
ObsenityofAtomicTech 8 months ago
ObamasLYING.Our gvrnnt is not to be trusted. Here comes another "terrorist attack" to scare uninformed Americans into giving up ALL their remaining freedoms.TheONLY solution is to get rid of our Shadow Government .The Federal Reserve Bank.A privately owned banking cabal that runs the World. TheONLY politicians r on board here r RonPaul&Dennis Kucinich.See Loose Change/Fiat Empire on utube. Read Secrets of the Federal Reserve Creature from Jeckyll Island, Watch The Obama Deception movie.
mgrealdeals 8 months ago in playlist 9/11 - Somerset County - Shanksville 8
@mgrealdeals here here! Except America is too preoccupied with how many boob jobs Heidi Montag gets and how much kim kardashian spent on her wedding to ever realize the harsh truths of our current situation. Jesus, WAKE UP AMERICA!!!
loafywedge 4 months ago 24
@loafywedge Jesus please come literally wake us up ..there is no other hope for this broken world
julieshie 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Our Gov. is full of shit and stupid Americans eat it up. The "news" that u watch on the networks and cable stations are owned by the very people who plan all these wars and "terror attacks"..You think you will hear anything other than the party line?
Wake Up.
Watch: The Obama Deception, Fiat Empire, Inside Job, Loose Change,Fog of War
Read Secrets of the Federal Reserve by Eustace Mullins
Read : The Creature From Jeckyll Island by Griffin
mgrealdeals 8 months ago in playlist 9/11 - Somerset County - Shanksville
Yes, the more telling question is why anyone would think a single witness proves anything beyond all shadow of a doubt. It might be OK if this were really a strong witnesses. But clearly she's weak; she's been influenced by e-mails telling her it was a missile; and she didn't remember hearing a crash until two days later.
Some proof. That's 9/11 truth for you - not understanding the nature of evidence, cherrypicking a select witness who stand in isolation to the other witnesses.
cchris874 9 months ago
"prove beyond a doubt" Really?
MrJpmoneypants 9 months ago
Clearly a hysterical lady who doesn't know what she saw. She admits that she didn't hear it crash. This lady needs to take some medication, and then rest. She is saw something that scared her, and now she's confused. Sad.
quinnjim 9 months ago
as u can see flight 93 the video was faked it is not real it got faked if u want to see on ur own here is the link --->Proof that 9/11 flight 93 did not crash at Shanksville
if u think it crashed in shanksville WERE ARE THE PLANE PARTS AVIOUSLY THERE ARE NO PLANE PARTS SO THE PLANE DID NOT CRASH IN SHANKSVILLE tell me what u think ?
Marianmichael100 9 months ago
Drone
WolfPac1ws 10 months ago
9/11 FACTS:
No planes
No hijackers
No terrorists
No boxcutters
No evidence at all of plane crash at Shankesville (except planted)
No evidence at all of plane crash at WTC (except planted)
No evidence at all of plane crash at Pentagon (except planted)
9/11 was a complete HOAX! "Live" TV fakery, constant propaganda and the shock-and-awe campaign by OUR Government against the American people enabled the Rise of Fascism in this country under Bush and it continues and expands under Obama!
apatriotofusa 10 months ago 18
@apatriotofusa No planes? Then how come planes crashed into the towers? There were people there. I know people who were in New York at the time. They saw it. No hijackers? The list of people who got on the airplanes is well known. It is shows in virtually every 9/11 video. Those hijackers were real people. Osama, himself, admitted that they crashed the planes into the towers so we suffer like they do. Even Kalishek Muhammad admitted that he masterminded the whole 9/11 plot. It was no hoax.
Hildron101010 10 months ago
@Hildron101010 NO PLANES crashed into the towers. 9/11 WAS A COMPLETE HOAX. Of course the list of hijackers is "well known"...the Ministry of Propaganda showedtheir faces 24/7 for months....total propaganda! At least Half of them are still alive in the ME! The OBL confession tape has been proven a CIA hoax! OBL has stated he had NOTHING to do with it! The "mastermind" confessed after being waterboarded 183 times! I would confess to 9/11 after that! You need to wake up pal.......
apatriotofusa 10 months ago
@apatriotofusa Why do I need to wake up? You said no planes crashed into the towers. If so, how come there was video footage of the planes crashing into the towers. I know people who were there when it happened. They saw it.
Hildron101010 10 months ago
@Hildron101010 No offense to you personally, but you are deaf, dumb and blind ignorant regarding your knowledge of the FACTS of 9/11. But it's not your fault. You are a victim of the mass-propaganda campaign that has been waged on the American people for DECADES. They just put it into overdrive since 9/11. The level of technology used on 9/11 is mind-boggling. Holograms, orbs, sophisticated UAV's and other alien elements. Planes were added after the fact by CGI. LIve reporters saw NOTHING .
apatriotofusa 10 months ago 10
@apatriotofusa I don't believe a single word you say for a second. I know people who were there. They saw the planes hit. You can't just animate something into real life. They were there. Why would we kill 3000 of our own people and create hundreds of millions of dollars of damages?
Hildron101010 10 months ago
@Hildron101010 THAT is the question! The answer is threefold: (1) The pretext they needed to sway public opinion for an invasion of the ME. (2) To use this as the pretext for extablishing an Orwellian Control System (The Dept of Fatherland Securtity, the NSA and the TSA). (3) To use this as the pretext for incrementally taking away every right we have left, while simultaneously bankrupting the nation so it can be absorbed by the NWO Mafia Banksters who will impose AUSTERITY. End of lesson.....
apatriotofusa 10 months ago
@Hildron101010...I know it's hard to fathom, but the Bankers, who controls all that u see, have been doing this for along time. Human lives mean nothing to these people, and when your that powerful, it corrupts. They create false panic to move their agenda...such as this, then tell u it's terrorism(made up) then that gives them reason for war. the U.S need a loan from the big bank, bankers prosper off of war, or any conflict. If I control your money, I control U....Please wake up!!
rhapalot 9 months ago
@apatriotofusa Along with Apatrioto Fusa, you are a retard.
DKaijuGomoMan 6 months ago
@apatriotofusa Live reporters saw nothing? Tell that to WB11, CNN, Fox News, Fox News 5, and the other stations that were live on the scene you fucking moron.
DKaijuGomoMan 6 months ago
@DKaijuGomoMan The video shown in the new studio, and called "live" , had already been digitally altered before anyone saw it on TV. All the "news" stations were showing the CGI versions to you and the rest of America. They could have shown you ANYTHING, told you it was a live broadcast, and you would not know the difference. People believe what they see on television. Which is sickeningly pathetic.
apatriotofusa 6 months ago
@apatriotofusa Uhm..? Then how do you explain their reaction... How do you explain how they explain what happened?? The only thing wrong is a simple time delay. God damn your stupid. If they could tell me anything and tell me it was a live broadcast and it wouldn't be, then how could you explain that it was aired SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 AT AROUND 8:46 A.M.!?!? The next day they were showing footage that was brought in from people recording it. Can you think about what your saying? Cuz it's annoying.
DKaijuGomoMan 6 months ago
@DKaijuGomoMan
Oh my, you ran out of facts; thus you become potty mouthed?
BuckworthJackson 5 months ago
@BuckworthJackson What? Did just see what I said?
Obviously you don't pay good attention.
DKaijuGomoMan 5 months ago
@DKaijuGomoMan
First off, I'm not a member of the Democratic Underground.... far from it.
but I've researched this b/s for nearly a year... just about full time.
I'm a retired cop. trained to follow all leads.
Thus, with confidence, i pronounce 9-11 as pure bull.
BuckworthJackson 5 months ago
@Hildron101010 Have you ever heard of the Ghostplane Theory? A man took a shot of the WTC and made a video so it looked exactly like the rest did. Another guy animated the commonly known vids of the south tower getting hit. He points out how it seemed to have a different flight pattern for ever plane that hit. On the vid of the first tower getting hit, the shadow hits the impact zone before the plane, then passes it.
kidkong584 9 months ago
@Hildron101010 You're the living proof of how dumb and ignorant people can be. There are a lot of story's (conspiracy theories if you will) about 9/11, but we can absolutely be 100% sure that the official 9/11 commission report is a bunch of bullshit. Just as @apatriotofusa said to you, wake up buddy! There's no use for you to keep yourself stupid and blind. You've got internet, so use it! Don't get me wrong it's all for the best. Just want the truth out there. If there are any truths left......
YGoMeZF 8 months ago
@YGoMeZF I'm not going to bother to drag this argument much further because all of the conspiracy proof is nothing. You can't prove it didn't happen any better than anyone can prove it did happen.
Hildron101010 8 months ago
@Hildron101010 I don't have to prove it. Others already did. At least the official story is bullshit, if you believe they told us the truth, you've got another thing coming bro.
Conspiracy proof is nothing? Then why do people get killed over this? Why is there so many PROOF on these conspiracy's? There have been secret societies for a long long time, there still are.
Never the less it's still your choice what to believe. I'm just hoping for you it isn't to late!
Now I'm going to sleep.
Peace!
YGoMeZF 8 months ago
@Hildron101010
What you think you saw holograms and edited videos.
There is no way an aircraft - made mostly of aluminum could cut into the steel beams of WTC 1 & 2.
Look up the photos of the B-25 that hit the Empire State building in July, 1945
BuckworthJackson 5 months ago
@apatriotofusa I'm not saying you're wrong at all, but I just have one question, if there weren't any planes, how come there were planes? Hundreds of thousands of people saw them in the city. I even know one person who was there. It was all over TV too, it can't be fake generated that fast by CG or any other method.
Hildron101010 8 months ago
@Hildron101010 The technology used against the American people on 9/11 is beyond most people's imagination. The already ridiculous story of 19 Islamic hijackers defeating the entire North American Defense Network with boxcutters, becomes even more ludicrous when you realize that hundreds of orbs, UAV's and other alien-looking craft were flying all around the WTC and the Pentagon on 9/11....Where have you been for the last 10 years.......? Watching CNN? You won't get any truth there.....
apatriotofusa 8 months ago
@apatriotofusa I understand that the technology to fake it could be better over sources such as the news, but hundreds of thousands of people witnessed it. The planes crashed right there, people saw it, there's no denying it.
Hildron101010 8 months ago
@Hildron101010 There's no denying it? OK, first of all it is NOT POSSIBLE for a 767 to crash THROUGH a building. It is even MORE IMPOSSIBLE for a 767 to crash through a building with it's NOSECONE INTACT. Also, NOT POSSIBLE for jet fuel (kerosene) to MELT STEEL. Also NOT POSSIBLE that the Pentagon plane "vaporized". NOT POSSIBLE. Also NOT POSSIBLE that the Shankesville plane "vaporized" on impact! NOT POSSIBLE. Also most (if not all) of the "witnesses" on TV were PAID ACTORS! No denying? I deny.
apatriotofusa 8 months ago
@apatriotofusa How old are you? I don't know if you have that much knowledge of physics. Of course it's possible. It melted the steal because the impact destroyed the fire-proofing. Temperatures get extremely high after fueled by jet fuel for so long. Also, the plain didn't completely vaporize at Shanksville. There were pieces of it still visible. But it is still possible to do such a thing. It crashed at over 580 MPH, in solid ground, and it was full of jet fuel. That's enough to burn anything.
Hildron101010 8 months ago
@Hildron101010 If you must know, I'm 54 and have been a mechanical engineer for 26 years. You on the other hand are fairly ignorant. Jet fuel (a hydrocarbon) CANNOT reach a sufficiently high temperature to melt steel. Again, NOT POSSIBLE. 767's utilize Pratt and Whitney (Rolls Royce) titanium engines. IMPOSSIBLE TO DESTROY! They would have been recovered if they were there. They weren't. You have to face the truth.....you and every other person in America WAS LIED TO AND PLAYED FOR A FOOL.
apatriotofusa 8 months ago
@apatriotofusa Impossible to destroy? I don't think anything is impossible to destroy. In fact, I know a guy personally who works for a plane engine company. I'm sure he can tell me pretty easily what's true. Someone like you shouldn't be wasting their time on the Internet spreading this crap.
Hildron101010 8 months ago
@apatriotofusa Sorry, ignore my steel type-o. But I also must mention that you completely over-looked the fact of the impact, and removal of fire proofing. Not all of the steel needs to be melted. Towers at high heights sway. That, plus weight of a collapsing building, plus hi temperatures, plus the impact damaging a large part of a building, is way more than enough to bring it down.
Hildron101010 8 months ago
@apatriotofusa Plus the steel wasn't melted, it was weakened by the heat. The melting temperature is higher than the theoretical max burning temp of the fuel, but it's close enough to make it weaken, and then buckle. Not to mention it was already damaged by the impact and all of the weight it was holding up.
Hildron101010 8 months ago
@Hildron101010 As Jethro Tull might say. You are thick as a brick...........get back to me when you have some actual data. Over and out.
apatriotofusa 8 months ago
@apatriotofusa You tell me that, yet you still say there were no planes. Aside from public broadcasts, hundreds of thousands of people saw it. Ask everyone who was in New York that day. If you've got the extreme amount of time to do that. I'm sure they'll say they saw it.
Hildron101010 8 months ago
@Hildron101010 I thought we were done.....Look, stop regurgitating and defending the official story and do some honest research.....use your brain. Reach your own conclusions. If you do honest research, there is no other answer than the official story is a LIE. Now go do your homework........
apatriotofusa 8 months ago
@apatriotofusa damn so u cant melt it ?? wtf they do on 9 11
brandontheruler11 8 months ago
@brandontheruler11 There weren't any planes on 9/11.......none at all......no hijackers either. If you really want to see some bizarre truth about 9/11, check out my videos. But don't blame me if you crap your pants...
apatriotofusa 8 months ago
@apatriotofusa see they said it was 17 but showed 19 piks so where is the other 2 fellas
brandontheruler11 8 months ago
@brandontheruler11 There never WERE any hijackers......get it? 9/11 was a total lie...........
apatriotofusa 8 months ago 24
@apatriotofusa i understand what u saying i believe u on that and i saw ur video and i know all about cloaking so what hit the towers and what about ppl who took video and my 2nd cousin who was on the damn plane where is she
brandontheruler11 8 months ago
@brandontheruler11 Hey, I wish I had all the answers for you.....I've just been trying to put the pieces together for the last 8 years, and the picture is looking very bizarre indeed. TV fakery has been proven, as far as at-home viewers are concerned. As for the people who actually "saw" the planes, the multitude of orbs, UAV's and the technology of these aliens, is so advanced beyond ours that holograms would be child's pla yand seems probable. As for what turned the WTC to dust? Not jet fuel.
apatriotofusa 8 months ago
@apatriotofusa well said....indeed any hijacker would find it impossible to board a cgi plane
cartoonplanes 8 months ago
@cartoonplanes People will believe anything if they see it on television.......Why do you think they call it PROGRAMMING?!
apatriotofusa 8 months ago
@apatriotofusa Agreed.
brianwesley28 4 months ago
@apatriotofusa "No evidence at all of plane crash at WTC (except planted)" - this is a hoax.. dont stick with it..
dickobrazz01 7 months ago
@dickobrazz01 I agree 100%........9/11 WAS A TOTAL HOAX!
apatriotofusa 7 months ago
@apatriotofusa no anything but a lot of victims :(... this is awful you know?... I will shit on the goverment!
lorena0987 6 months ago
@apatriotofusa OMG THIS IS THE FUNNIEST PIECE OF SHIT I'VE READ EVER HAVING TO DEAL WITH 9/11!!!
Thanks for making my Day.
Anyhow, Your are just simply retarded to believe that!!! MY GOD I am really actually disappointed in you for believing this. Please get a brain sometime along with the 12 morons who liked your comment.
DKaijuGomoMan 6 months ago
@DKaijuGomoMan 12 morons? I think not. More like a jury of my peers. I have been aquitted. And you are guilty of nothing more than pure ignorance. It's not your fault. So you are free to go on believing in your dream world. After all, it's not fair to convict someone when that person HAS NO IDEA WHAT IS GOING ON........
Ladies and gentlemen...........I rest my case.
apatriotofusa 6 months ago
@apatriotofusa Smh... I honestly feel bad for you. People just haven't opened there eyes yet...
Just wait until every 9/11 theory gets debunked... which most have already been debunked.
DKaijuGomoMan 6 months ago
@DKaijuGomoMan You sir, have no business talking about "opened eyes".....you are a blind man, in a dark room, looking for a black cat, that someone on TV told you was in there.....
apatriotofusa 6 months ago
@apatriotofusa Oh.? Then explain to me how there is NO evidence of a plane crash at the WTC and the Pentagon!!! God damn do you know how much footage there is of the plane hitting the second tower??? My lord your dumb and you call me blind. You must be blind and deaf.
DKaijuGomoMan 6 months ago
@DKaijuGomoMan If you analyze that footage, instead of blindly accepting what you're fed, you will see the "planes" are computer-generated images. You will see that there was NEVER any plane at the WTC or the Pentagon. However, the same analysis of that footage reveals hundreds of alien-looking orbs and other craft flying all over the place on 9/11.
I don't think these ultra-sophisticated orbs and UAV's belong to Al Queda..........do you?
Oh, sorry.....I forgot. You don't know shit do you?
apatriotofusa 6 months ago
@apatriotofusa Alien-looking Orbs? Try some police choppers. I never knew holographs can forge a crater that fits the exact shape-size of the planes that flew into it. Also didn't know that the engines, wheels, and other parts of the plane would be all over the ground from the collusion with the building from a holograph. You honestly think that the Government has been hiding this kind of technology? Shows you don't think too much. I think your the one who doesn't know shit.
DKaijuGomoMan 6 months ago