Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (6)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • hehehe

    

  • (and just to avoid unnecessary argument, I' know the piece is by Brahms and not Haydn, it was just a little side joke)

  • @BECawyer I just did this piece in my tonal analysis class for homework, the professor and I both thought it was 5+4+3, with the last measure of the five-bar phrase overlapping and also serving as the first measure of the four-bar phrase (it would be wrong to discount it as part of either phrase, although I agree with you that 4+4+3 sounds much closer than 5+6). The term my book uses is "phrase overlap" and Haydn was apparently all about it.

  • I think you are right; four, four, three really works well and yet...

    This is a visual analysis of the BBC programme 'Discovering Music' and the presenter clearly counts 'five', and then describes a winding down in the last six bars.

    I have left a link in the drop-down bar. The description is around the 9th minute into the programme.

  • Although the head of the first phrase does return at 0:58, it is not correct to split the remaining measures of this section into one group of 5 and one of six. Four, four and three fits much better to the musical structure.

  • OBOE(:

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more