yes... circular reasoning is stupid, but evolution (meaning bacteria -> monkey -> man) is wrong...
evolution is not caught in the act... the only "proof" are some bones (not only bones, you know what I mean) that put in relation with one another you can find an evolving pattern..
When the transformation will be observed then evolution would have a foot to stand on.
Example: the ford model T did not evolve into the latest mustang by itself... You don't look at the cars and say "evolution" do you?
Great points all around, but especially at the end. You're spot on there bro! They have to learn our position before they attempt to try and debunk it. Outstanding example with the snake and the orange.
Thanks, and sorry for the late response. I noticed someone downthumbed your comment instead of actually responding to it. I'd bet it was a fucktard, and one who requires the dark Socratic method.
hes just a homeschooled dumbass. he is clearly spouting the shit his parents told him but he doesnt know if he believes it or not, he just wants to out of fear of hell. hes such a loser, that if there were a loser award, he wouldnt even win it.
No, it makes sense. If you could get an award for being a loser, then this guy would be so much of a loser he couldn't get the reward. X=-infinity, thus x<y, whereas y= the biggest loser of the current award ceremony. Once again, you fail at logic. Please either educate yourself or sterilize yourself..
The 50/500 rule is pretty damn firm and there is one famous species that is the Poster Child for it. You need 50 individuals to ensure short term health. You need 500 for long term health. The Cheetah was reduced to 80 individuals some 20,000 years ago. They became so inbred because of this, they're all nearly clones of each other. No skin graft rejection between individuals. And it's been 20,000 years! Imagine if all species were reduced to 2 individuals? Yikes!
One of those "mysteries" of the bible. As in, "How could they be so stupid as to miss *that* little problem?" Can't blame them for the inanity of the story. It's common to almost all creation myths. First Man and First Woman. But, they were busy cherry picking bits and pieces of 3 different creation myths to make the Book of Genesis, you'd think they could have added some versimilitide?
All of my responses are toned against the statements made to provoke them.
If you have one family, CONSISTING OF TWO PARENTS, and then those children interbreed, that fits the stereotype of an inbred Alabama/Texas/Louisiana satirical family.
yes... circular reasoning is stupid, but evolution (meaning bacteria -> monkey -> man) is wrong...
evolution is not caught in the act... the only "proof" are some bones (not only bones, you know what I mean) that put in relation with one another you can find an evolving pattern..
When the transformation will be observed then evolution would have a foot to stand on.
Example: the ford model T did not evolve into the latest mustang by itself... You don't look at the cars and say "evolution" do you?
dantheman1507 1 year ago
@dantheman1507 "but evolution (meaning bacteria -> monkey -> man) is wrong..."
Your version of it, yes.
"evolution is not caught in the act."
Care to explain nylonase then? Or how about ring species? How about the E. Coli long term evolution product?
Cars don't reproduce, your analogy is hackneyed as well as flawed. Take my creationist challenge.
jesuriah 1 year ago
@jesuriah
cars don't, robots might... let's see them evolve
dantheman1507 1 year ago
@dantheman1507 How can something with no genes undergo gene mutation?
It's clear to me you don't understand evolution, at all.
jesuriah 1 year ago
@jesuriah
dude... still it's not caught in the act
dantheman1507 1 year ago
Solid vid.
HelplessVictim 2 years ago
@HelplessVictim
like my piss
dantheman1507 1 year ago
Great points all around, but especially at the end. You're spot on there bro! They have to learn our position before they attempt to try and debunk it. Outstanding example with the snake and the orange.
h8uall66 2 years ago
Thanks, and sorry for the late response. I noticed someone downthumbed your comment instead of actually responding to it. I'd bet it was a fucktard, and one who requires the dark Socratic method.
jesuriah 2 years ago
hes just a homeschooled dumbass. he is clearly spouting the shit his parents told him but he doesnt know if he believes it or not, he just wants to out of fear of hell. hes such a loser, that if there were a loser award, he wouldnt even win it.
4jonah 2 years ago
"hes such a loser, that if there were a loser award, he wouldnt even win it."
are you like 9 or something?
s1lentkrnsou1jah 2 years ago
No, it makes sense. If you could get an award for being a loser, then this guy would be so much of a loser he couldn't get the reward. X=-infinity, thus x<y, whereas y= the biggest loser of the current award ceremony. Once again, you fail at logic. Please either educate yourself or sterilize yourself..
jesuriah 2 years ago
The 50/500 rule is pretty damn firm and there is one famous species that is the Poster Child for it. You need 50 individuals to ensure short term health. You need 500 for long term health. The Cheetah was reduced to 80 individuals some 20,000 years ago. They became so inbred because of this, they're all nearly clones of each other. No skin graft rejection between individuals. And it's been 20,000 years! Imagine if all species were reduced to 2 individuals? Yikes!
RyuDarragh 2 years ago
One of those "mysteries" of the bible. As in, "How could they be so stupid as to miss *that* little problem?" Can't blame them for the inanity of the story. It's common to almost all creation myths. First Man and First Woman. But, they were busy cherry picking bits and pieces of 3 different creation myths to make the Book of Genesis, you'd think they could have added some versimilitide?
RyuDarragh 2 years ago
Using the bible? Where did the women that Adams sons married come from? I hope none of them was named Oedipus.
RyuDarragh 2 years ago
That's one red-neck-ass family.
jesuriah 2 years ago
PUHAHHAAH before you try insulting anybody, you should look at yourself.
s1lentkrnsou1jah 2 years ago
All of my responses are toned against the statements made to provoke them.
If you have one family, CONSISTING OF TWO PARENTS, and then those children interbreed, that fits the stereotype of an inbred Alabama/Texas/Louisiana satirical family.
Congratulations, you are FULL of fail.
jesuriah 2 years ago