Russia and america are to smart for mass destruction...
BUT what if some aliens came to earth? You might think its ridiculous, but those guys are really keeping that as a possibilty.. and they should, you'll never know, they have those weapons for protecting us, not fighting eachother.
The US definitely does NOT have a perfect record or even a good record for being the "good guy," although the US has done many good things. They have killed and brutalized people over money too. The US is powerful and prestigious and other countries want a piece of that. It doesn't matter who should and should not have nuclear weapons, leaders are going to try and get them for economic gain and respect.
You stupid BITCH! We Americans ARE the GOOD GUYS! Are country is the GOOD country! Do you think for one moment that an ARAB or N. Korean/Chinese nation would allow you to spew your BULLSHIT all over the internet? It's BECAUSE of America and Americans that you have the freedom to open you F---ing mouth! Remember that the next time you question who is bad and who is good! If it wasn't for the US Of A USING the A-BOMB you would be SPRECHENDER DEUTSCHER RIGHT NOW!
If the US is so terrible join forces and crush us. Why not? It would be so easy to kill all the fat, lazy, arrogant, selfish, and ugly people living here. Don't say it's because you're not like that, your writing about it. You hate the US so much; hate us for what we did, what we do, who we are, and what we stand for.
What would you do in our position? Who do you really trust with a nuke? Not even your own government right? Use nukes - you kill the planet and yourself. N. Korea, Iran...really?
honey, you're usually smart but here you sounded so naive, the US government doesn't do it out of ignorance or innocence. They do it in order to mind-control the masses, and condition their brains to think like uncritical consumerist drones. Ever heard of... Hollywood ?
Ok lets put the record straight here !!! The only country in history of mankind to make usage of the nuclear weapon on another country is the.... ok you guessed it... USA !!! Yup in 1945 on Nagasaki and Hiroshima in WW II !! Now since 1945 check out the list of countries the USA has ''attacked'', bombed and occupated and you will see that none had the nuclear device ..... Coincidence ??? Nope the Yankees dont attack countries with nukes, so now you know why N. Korea and Iran want the ''bomb''..
Who's the good guy? The one who won't wake up tomorrow and decide to use it. We used our nukes twice in the midst of a war that dragged on. We haven't used them since.
"Bad guys" are labeled so for a reason. They won't hesitate if it serves the purpose to wipe whoever off the map.
I can't believe 1) this wasn't completely obvious and 2) Martinez got three thumbs up.
I am the good guy, and most of you are neutral. some of you are the bad guys , and we fight.....its Gods playground...i think god is playing some sort of command and conquer on his supra dimensional ATARI.....move biaatches, its your turn....LOL
they are not comments like you see on places like russian army is the powerful and shit, where stupid people say russia is the best and it is thumbed up
"Who decides who gets to be a good guy or a bad guy" Answer: The good guy in the view of the masses is almost always the guy fighting for things to stay the same and keep the harmony. The bad guy, well the guy who is stirring the pot. "Its ironic that a bad guy can imposes his will, fight and stick to his guns to the point where he becomes a good guy".NUKES are power to impose will.In this case Kim J, wants nukes so someday the world will know him as a good guy.Its in out DNA, were only human.
That a stupid question. Im not pro-american anti-muslim campaign BUT I recognize the Iranian governement and north korea as a threat. Why ? Well, Iranian just want bomb Israëli people. This is cleary not an act of peace or selfdefence and I cant approve that.
Okay.. let's say we give up our nukes.. and now we have no way to defend ourselves.. so now anyone with a nuke.. can tell us what to do.. - I think this is a no brainer.. it doesn't matter who is good or bad.. it's about whoever has the bigger bomb gets to tell the other person what to do.. and I'd rather it be us..
OMG. Pple it's not a matter of good guy or bad guy.
My personal view would be more concerned with science, philosophy and sociology [This topic is BIG]
But since very few pple would care to hear such views, I'll represent a more "up to standard" opinion. [of course depending on some standards this still will not be justifying.]
[since the comment was too large it was divided into two parts.]
Russia, China and the USA aren't gonna use these weapons (still a scary thought that they exist)!
The middle east has shown over and over that they are unbalanced and will kill at a drop of a hat.
I do not believe that these people would hesitate to use nukes if they had them..I mean they strap bombs to themselves and blow up innocent people ALL the time...
So why not nuke the world? Shit they would probable have people standing in line wanting to be strapped to the missiles
I can't respect someone's perspective that it is ok to murder women and children with machetes because they are the wrong ethnic group, or living in the wrong place. There are some standards the people of the world follow. What you will notice is generally speaking, when someone acts against those moral standards, they do not say those standards are wrong, they rationalize why it is ok for them to not obey them at that time.
It's the people with their fingers on the triggers to the bombs who get to decide who are the good guys and, yes, of course we all believe we're the good guys.
Silly rabbit.
Personally, nuclear weapons don't scare me near as much as biological weapons. It only takes $100K to setup a bio lab. 20K if your not concerned about safety. It takes a country to setup a nuclear program. A bio lab cab be setup in a small house. And once a bio weapon is let loose, you can't get it back.
Oh, I know who the bad guy is: that bastard named Kim and all his friends.
Ironically, your bombs helped bring WWII to an end. I'm not saying it was not tragic; I'm saying ironically.
In a perfect world nobody has to have bombs. But this is not a perfect world. And it makes a world of difference who gets access to bombs. And I'd say put them all in the right hands. And by right hands I don't mean NKorea.
Culture clash, the threat of the other, an eye for an eye, we'll all be blind. Irony, imperialist governments proclaim - the bomb is the only way to ensure a global peace - its not peace but an ongoing fear. I say let there be fallout, and through the ashes a new order will be formed. Now, this is why the bomb will never be dropped, not due to mass lost of life, when has government cared about that, But the social superstructure will be wiped out. and that's not good business.
Surprisingly that made sense. No one should be aloud to have any type of weapon really if you look at it that way. We should just destroy all weapons.
Yes, it is too much to ask and expect from people. Not all of them are as educated or intellectual to think so deep into these matters, actually you make the president sound stupid now that you said "everybody thinks they are the good guys." that's so true. btw it's not always easy to think something from other's prospective.
Right... go ahead and ignore all the authoritarian regimes in Africa, the Middle East and Latin America then. Ask people in Ethiopia or Burma if America is "destroying the world".
Or, since you seem to be German - ask your East German counterparts just whose sphere of influence they would have preferred to have been under: the USA or the USSR.
the usa destroyed most parts of southamerica,africa,middle east,india nd so on.
they even installed many dictators themselves, the USA is the reason that most countries are ppor, the usa cant live without robbing and massmurdering other ppl, also they dont allow africans medicine against HIV
this include china and russia who are not really fond of the usa however they agree that north korea is too unstable to be allowed to have such weapons
What a joke! The 5 countries that make up the permanent SC also happen to be the same five countries that sell the most weapons around the world. You gotta be shitting me here?
SC=/=permanent security counsil also nukes and conventional weapons are completely different, inb4 no they are not i wanna see a conventional weapon making a whole city dissapear or 20 of them making a country colapse
I'd rather the U.S. have the slingshot than Kim Jong Il and Iran. And the U.S. will have to jump through a LOT of legal and political hoops before we use that slingshot.
But judging by your 9/11 conspiracy video and the JFK video you favorited, I'd say you're another one of those nuts that I can't have a reasonable discussion with.
I'm not scared of a kid who wants a slingshot. But I am worried about the kid who thinks he should be the only one on the block with a slingshot.
Being that the USA has the largest stockpile of nukelar weapons and being that the USA is to only one insane enough to have already used it TWICE on a civilian target. I certainly mistrust any American who claims the US should have a say on who gets the bomb and who doesnt.
So we should keep our nukes. I don't trust these dictators. But I do trust Barack Obama. America is fundamentally a good nation, a noble nation, and one that should maintain its arsenal.
I trust the U.S. having nukes because there are enough people that won't allow our arsenal to be used. Our democracy works. President Obama shares your beliefs. Our democratic election of this man should assuage any fears countries may have of America.
On the other hand, the Russian government is questionable. Akhmadenijad (however you spell it, I never used Hooked on Phonics) is almost solely in charge of his government. Kim Jong Il, too! There, a select few have access to the button.
In fact, the USA is the only state to be insane enough to have EVER used the bomb on a densely populated civilian target. Not once mind you, BUT TWICE.
Now you actually think your bosses can be trusted with the bomb while others should not be trusted with the bomb?
Well, the next time we enter a world war on the same scale as WWII with a military draft, hundreds of thousands of U.S. casualties, etc. I'll come ask for your opinion on whether we should drop the bomb.
Your arguement is atrocious, comparing WWII to the current world.
Your president won't drop the bomb. And we've learned lessons since 1945--most of the world has learned lessons.
And yet again, I say that we would have a rebellion in the U.S. if nukes were again used.
>>And yet again, I say that we would have a >>rebellion in the U.S. if nukes were again used.
Don't be so sure of that. Nobody lifted a finger the first time your gubment nuked an entire city of CIVILIANS and still nobody lifted a finger when your gubment nuked yet one more entire city of CIVILIANS...... do you really believe the sleeping/dazed American people will lift a finger if the gubment decides to nuke, say Iran, for example?
I AM sure of that. The situation's different: we were in a WORLD WAR with Japan. The current situation isn't even CLOSE!
As well, we live in a world of instantaneous communication. Pretty sure a LOT of people would lift ALL their fingers if the US government (with your Lord and Savior Barack Obama at the head) decided to unload its nukes on someone.
Which countries do we not mind having nukes? The U.S., the U.K., France, etc.
Not Russia, with its shady government. Not Pakistan and India, who have them aimed at each other and have governments run questionably. And especially not those countries run by dictators (who hate the US).
It's not that these countries think they're right. Their GOVERNMENTS think THEY are right.
It doesn't. Japan and the USA committed their fair share of atrocities like many other countries. (Japan against the Chinese, USA against the Japanese for example.)
The fact of the matter is that none of these nations are good or bad. They are just looking out for their own interest, and NK jeopardises those interest what ever it may be. And as such NK would be seen as a rogue nation until it conforms.
North Korea wants to leverage itself out of the economic sanctions which were put up against her. I don't support their behavior but I do understand that every other country on the axis of evil which complied to Americas demands was screwed over. Iraq was safe all throughout the 90s when they did have weapons of mass destruction but when Hussein wanted to get the sanctions lifted and let UN inspectors in, the us invaded.
Iran signed a non-proliferation treaty ( the same Germany and Japan signed too) and complies to it but as soon as it was signed the US and Israel demanded they use no Nuclear technology at all and constantly threaten Iran with Invasions.
Maybe if America kept to it's word like Europe does other countrys would be more inclined to work with us.
though what you say mabye true it is none the less irrelivent...first of all Europe is a piece of baby crap who always puts a stink in things mabye if they would intervien sometimes and not just sit on their asses all the time mabye this wouldnt happen either mabye if they would help with the conflic between isreal and other places we wouldnt have to interfer thanks have a nice day :)
Europe does support Israel, they just don't support the killing of innocent civilians. Maybe you should read up on what Europe does in the world before criticizing it.
Whoever posted this video is either incredibly naïve or she has not yet realised the basic fundamental of world politics. It is as follows, whoever has the gold makes the rules. America along with most of the countries that deplored the NK nuclear test are very wealthy. And as such wield great influence over world affairs. Moreover none of these countries can claim moral enlightenment. In my opinion there is no civilised nation on earth...
Kim Jong Il doesn't respect "the right to have your own perspective". He runs a slave state which he openly intends to expand into South Korea; that's what makes him dangerous.
I agree with that but most people don't see communism as a threat because they associate all forms of socialism as a pro middle-class idealogy. What they don't know is that communism is the parent idealogy of HItler's National Socialism and Mussilini's Fascist state.
Going forward the worst threats come from China which is economically free but has few checks and balances at the political level. The United States has also seen a very bad erosion of its checks and balances since the 1960's which could push the US into the definition of a fascist state. Nuclear weapons are not a problem... centralized political systems lacking checks and balances are the real deadly threat to life on this planet.
Logic is only good when put in historical perspective. You can sound really good in debate class with all these "moral equivalence" assumptions... That is until you compare the historical record of democratic republics vs the various form of tyranny to blight the earth. Republics can possibly use nuclear technology responsibly while dictatorships, simply cannot do anything responsibly. Without checks and balances power will corrupt the most angelic every time. Just read history!
Reality is separate from human perception. America upon inventing atomic weapons used them precisely 2 times and only because the Japanese appeared likely to fight to the last citizen. America could have used the technology to basically take over the world but instead just helped their former enemies rebuild after WWII and allowed the various regions to more or less govern themselves while allying against the nations that the Soviet Union over ran by force. Admirable restraint unique in history
Thank you very much Raptoreyes. I'm actually tired of the idea that a nation opposes us and poses a real threat....so we eliminate the threat & rebuild the nation. Huh? We free a country from an oppressive regime that tortures and kills people just for fun, then we expect nothing in return.
Thank you because its hard to swim against the tide of opinion and we cannot silently agree with those we support. Being a silent majority is no good because radicals ignore anything that is not an immediate threat to them and deal harshly with anything that is. Being proactive in speaking up can prevent bad ideas from simply flowing into a media vacuum. Speaking in support of gives comfort to those who took the first risks of contentious debate. Again thanks!
The question is not who is a bad guy, and who is a good guy. The question is how are you going to protect yourself against those that would harm you and your family. The president is responsible for protecting the american people. If there is a person who has a gun, are you going to use sticks and stones to protect your self, or are you going to use something stronger than what he has. In a perfect world, there would be no nukes, but I agrre you are idealistic and thats ok.
Is that why the US used nukes? Because we hated Japan?
And all along I thought it was to stop Japan from trying to take over the whole Pacific ocean. The Japanese attacked the US. But your comment didn't seem to take that into account.
We fire bombed their cities and they didn't stop. Next would have been an invasion of the Japanese mainland.
They sent kamikaze attacks against our ships and carriers.
It's not like we just decided one day to go bomb Japan because we hated her.
Nobody said the US did it because they hated Japan, Hitler didn't hate England either. And what difference does it make? America used WMDs on civilians which is a crime regardless of all your attempts to justify it.
I would really like to see your reactions if terrorists nuked the US and then used excuses like yours to justify it.
You make it sound like the US went straight up to Japan and dropped nuclear weapons as the very next action. I know that's not what you think, but that's how your response to me saying they bombed us looks.
I wonder how long the war in the Pacific would have dragged on for if the US hadn't used nuclear weapons.
"They bombed a military port in Hawaii" Yes they did. Seems like an act of war to me. What? Just don't respond, like some vegetable? Make them think the US will just sit? NOT!
The war in the pacific was already lost to the Japanese by the time the Nukes fell. Those bombs had nothing to do with Japan, they were just an excuse to show the Soviets the military strength of the United States. The dropping of those bombs had more to do with the situation in Europe than in Asia.
Of course without the nuclear detonations the Soviets may have been inclined not to stop at Berlin and keep rolling Westwards. Considering the immense size of their military at the time, the allies would have had a hard time stopping them getting all the way to France. Nuclear weapons changed the situation somewhat.
Whether the Russians would have ever pushed West, we shall never know, but the fact remains that Truman was worried about it and ordered the Nuclear field tests as a result.
Not necessarily. We were either going to lose lots of men through our invasion of Japan or allow them to lose lots of civilians through the bomb. This way, the Japanese lost, instead of both sides losing perhaps MORE than the 200k lives of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
I am well aware what it was planning and Japan committed horrible atrocities against the Chinese, but it doesn't excuse the massive overkill that the United States government did to the Japanese. There is no honour in killing and harming non-combatants.
The perception at the time was a whole nation totally backing its emperor from women trained to kill solders with bamboo spears and children trained to run at solders with grenades. American commanders foresaw a fight against the entire Japanese population more or less instead of just the comparatively small military and political apparatus.
Good point. The war was one of escalation that convinced the American commanders that their would be no surrender without the emperor first being shocked enough to personally surrender. Some Japanese solders/civilians that did not hear the emperors surrender order were still hiding out well into the 1970's ready to die for their emperor. Talk about a proof of concept.
God bless the USA's military. God bless the USA. Peace through strength. Funny how people want to run a nation differently than they would run their own household/family.
Yes, let's just throw away all of our defensive equipment. I'm sure if we throw away all of our bombs, guns, weapons, aircraft, electronic countermeasures, etc, then the world would be safer and no one would want to kill us or others. The whole world would be a safer place if we stopped defending ourselves. ROFL. Go smoke some more weed.
Good point. The wolfs among us will only be encouraged if the peaceful among humanity appear to weak to defend themselves... indeed bullies start by looking for the easy prey on the playground or among the nation states.
I agree with you. I a wonderful world where we can bounce around on the clouds & hug everyone, this is a great idea, but then a terrorist knocks on your door....then your jerked back into reality. It's a noble thought though.
For those who don't get it: Lori is reporting for a news service called "Russia Today". Is this news from a Soviet...um, I mean, Russian perspective...?
Oh, one last thing: Who gets to decide who's a good guy and who's a bad guy? Answer: Nobody from Canada. You're not really part of the world stage, so you may as well stop pretending already...
So, let's play a game (for all you indoctrinated bozos). This game is called, "What's Wrong With This Country??" You've spent your whole lives deciding what is wrong with America... Now, spend a few minutes making a list of What's Wrong With the Following...(be impartial now)...
a) Russia
b) Cuba
c) Venezuela
d) Iran
e) Syria
f) China
g) North Korea (not just a worker's paradise, but a GEN-YOO-INE hell hole for the poor bastards that have to starve to death in their fields).
What's wrong with Venezuela? It's basically the only example of socialism, with a free and democratic process. They aren't evil and they don't have nukes. Honestly they are a world benchmark for socialism.
We can't really help what's wrong with those other countries...certainly not by force, although I doubt the US will ever learn that lesson, but here's a quiz for you:
1. Name all the countries in the world that have nuclear weapons.
2. Name every country in history who has ever actually USED one...
In the grand scheme of things, you are an insect and the people who control the world are the boot. I wonde who will win...? Thank God the world isn't run by 20 year old bimbos.
Jesus fucking Christ!!!!!!! You are a stupid bimbo!!!!!!
"Ya know, North Korea, I just don't, like, get why, like, you don't, like, like, us, and all..." Maybe some of you dumb fucks might like to read a book on the Korean War, for instance. Like, Google, like David, like Halberstam, like, you know? And like, maybe. like, you can gain, some, like, total grasp of some, like, historical shit, you know. Crazy!
Your profanity lessens your credibility, but I certainly agree with you. The attitude this woman has is a dangerous one. Terrorist nations & groups, communist nations, etc love to hear Americans talk like she's talking. China is salivating.
Yes i totally agree with Lori..no one should be having it.. but in reality this whole issue is too complicated.. Despite of all the progress weve made over the centuries it is so unfortunate to see that most of the bombardment came from the most developed countries.. so if they are doing so why r we so appalled to see the underdogs doing it.
Everyone needs a BAD GUY just to assume their own behavior... So believe that Satan exist and everything will be much more easier for ya... But be open-minded and travel is another solution...
Hi fairly complete stranger I have been watching you for far too long Missy Resident-though maybe it's all your fault for being far too appealing? Anyway just a post to say I want YOU to have all the nuclear weapons and dispose with them as you will as my sentiments have overcome my reason like most people. I mean Obama is OK but not in your league, and as for Kim he is too Jung "ILL" by far. Anyway in my country NZ we have no nukes so this is delightfully academic for us. Keep it up, kiddo!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
oh my goodness woman you are so liberal. ill tell you what how about we disarm the american population from guns too because i know police will take care of everything. ill just happily watch as my wife gets raped by a bad guy with a gun who didnt turn in his weapon when the american population was informed that guns are illegal. Because i know everything will be fine when the cops get there. ULTIMATELY WE CANT DISARM OUR NUCLEAR CAPABILITIES WOMAN BECAUSE THE BAD GUYS WONT!
Yeah... You definitely didn't listen to a word she said. You didn't even TRY to get her point. So please, stop being condescending, it just makes YOU look ridiculous.
Over 50,000 Americans personal experience who lost their lives fighting North Korea in the 1950's pretty much decides who gets the nukes and who doesn't. Lil' Kim can have his nukes... but America will take care of the delivery.
What the fuck is so noble about americans invading other countries and trying to dictate culture to other people? Never mind don't even answer, you're just an idiot who I am putting on display with your idiocy..
Lori, that's a very intelligent, mature perspective.
And personally, I think that the more you watch nature shows, the easier it is to understand human behavior and interaction. We're nothing more than incredibly intelligent monkeys fighting over pieces of the ground, to paraphrase a Tool song.
I'm still hoping that in the next few centuries, we finally realize that we're all stuck with each other on this slab of rock, and start working for PEOPLE, not corporations or individual egos.
Your profanity is proof of your character. If there were any legitimate war crimes committed, there would be trials. There were no trials because there were no issues. You are just repeating bumper-sticker phrases & mantras your masters have ordered you to say.
Stereotipically stupid. God, no wonder the USA is and has been doing so much shit in it's short history... Honestly, the world would be a better place without the USA and it's alarmingly retarded population, specially you, you 44 year old waste of bones and tissue.
So sad. The base side of my humanity is tempted to attack your intelligence, age, country or humanity using name-calling as you have done....but I will not sink to your level. I'll remain on the topic because I have not run out of intellectual ammunition as it seems you have. I'm sure you're doing the best you can, so God bless ya. :)
It is spelled "nonsense." So I assume you are a lawyer or with the JAG office and you have the classified information dockets for all of these individuals.
Thank you. I'll take it that you see that I believe in dignified speech that respects others' opinions even if we disagree with them. Looking at your profile it seems you disagree with me, but you have that right. God bless ya.
Of course they aren't inherently a threat to peace in the hands of a regime actually interested in peace. Sometimes you have to shut down people who endanger peace on a broader scale. You would't say a policeman's gun inherently threatens murder; rather, the idea is that it's there to stop someone when no other way exists to save a life.
Arguments against nuclear weapons in general are wastes of time.
Arguments against keeping them away from North Korea are common sense.
It's all relative from a theoretical point of view but the bad guys tend to be self-serving and don't like working for others.
Best response? Don't help them.
Did you know that Descartes refused to publish his book on physical science, Le Monde, after hearing about the trial of Galileo by the Inquisition? Afterwards he favored experimental observation over theory. And was less willing to share what he knew with others. It is likely there were others who also shared this perspective.
by the first part almost every (if not every) country is "bad" since each one only wants whats best for itself never thinking of the rest of the world.
as to the second who helps anybody as it is? almost the only time one country helps another is when it benefits the country helping
The US is the most hypocrite Country On the Face Of the Earth!
donaldflores96 3 months ago
kim jon il is a good guy
repect
SachaTheEvilOne 5 months ago
Like the man said:
Russia and america are to smart for mass destruction...
BUT what if some aliens came to earth? You might think its ridiculous, but those guys are really keeping that as a possibilty.. and they should, you'll never know, they have those weapons for protecting us, not fighting eachother.
Loupland 5 months ago
You look great in this video
syncade 6 months ago
Well said, but the people is that we all think we are the good guys.....
kenh2o 8 months ago
The US definitely does NOT have a perfect record or even a good record for being the "good guy," although the US has done many good things. They have killed and brutalized people over money too. The US is powerful and prestigious and other countries want a piece of that. It doesn't matter who should and should not have nuclear weapons, leaders are going to try and get them for economic gain and respect.
miljo34 9 months ago
You stupid BITCH! We Americans ARE the GOOD GUYS! Are country is the GOOD country! Do you think for one moment that an ARAB or N. Korean/Chinese nation would allow you to spew your BULLSHIT all over the internet? It's BECAUSE of America and Americans that you have the freedom to open you F---ing mouth! Remember that the next time you question who is bad and who is good! If it wasn't for the US Of A USING the A-BOMB you would be SPRECHENDER DEUTSCHER RIGHT NOW!
zwebster97 9 months ago
If the US is so terrible join forces and crush us. Why not? It would be so easy to kill all the fat, lazy, arrogant, selfish, and ugly people living here. Don't say it's because you're not like that, your writing about it. You hate the US so much; hate us for what we did, what we do, who we are, and what we stand for.
What would you do in our position? Who do you really trust with a nuke? Not even your own government right? Use nukes - you kill the planet and yourself. N. Korea, Iran...really?
kissmydownunder 9 months ago
honey, you're usually smart but here you sounded so naive, the US government doesn't do it out of ignorance or innocence. They do it in order to mind-control the masses, and condition their brains to think like uncritical consumerist drones. Ever heard of... Hollywood ?
ninearthify 9 months ago
Ok lets put the record straight here !!! The only country in history of mankind to make usage of the nuclear weapon on another country is the.... ok you guessed it... USA !!! Yup in 1945 on Nagasaki and Hiroshima in WW II !! Now since 1945 check out the list of countries the USA has ''attacked'', bombed and occupated and you will see that none had the nuclear device ..... Coincidence ??? Nope the Yankees dont attack countries with nukes, so now you know why N. Korea and Iran want the ''bomb''..
calisse245 9 months ago
To Iraq , U.S. are the "bad guys"
To US, Iraq are the "bad guys"
And to youtube, YOU are a bad guy, and oh how I wish YOU would be bombed.
Your NOT smart.
MrStealYoGirl69zz 10 months ago
Who's the good guy? The one who won't wake up tomorrow and decide to use it. We used our nukes twice in the midst of a war that dragged on. We haven't used them since.
"Bad guys" are labeled so for a reason. They won't hesitate if it serves the purpose to wipe whoever off the map.
I can't believe 1) this wasn't completely obvious and 2) Martinez got three thumbs up.
Magix1reaper 10 months ago
We do need super weapons incase an asteriod heads for Earth =)
GAMBlT 1 year ago
I am the good guy, and most of you are neutral. some of you are the bad guys , and we fight.....its Gods playground...i think god is playing some sort of command and conquer on his supra dimensional ATARI.....move biaatches, its your turn....LOL
AntiPsychopath 1 year ago
Who's the good guy? I don't know. I just know US can't be trusted with this. We're just awfully trigger happy. he he :]
wildbloodydragon 1 year ago
the good guy offcurse!
hdzsound 1 year ago
wow the thumbed up comments.....
they are not comments like you see on places like russian army is the powerful and shit, where stupid people say russia is the best and it is thumbed up
fucking hard facts
dontmakemeMAD1990 1 year ago
i get to decide. case closed!
pbl1 1 year ago
Fox News decides who is the good guy and who is the bad guy. xD goddamn I hate fox sooo much.
LadySeraph 1 year ago
"Who decides who gets to be a good guy or a bad guy" Answer: The good guy in the view of the masses is almost always the guy fighting for things to stay the same and keep the harmony. The bad guy, well the guy who is stirring the pot. "Its ironic that a bad guy can imposes his will, fight and stick to his guns to the point where he becomes a good guy".NUKES are power to impose will.In this case Kim J, wants nukes so someday the world will know him as a good guy.Its in out DNA, were only human.
sz42781 1 year ago
More tits please
techtwinz 1 year ago 2
That a stupid question. Im not pro-american anti-muslim campaign BUT I recognize the Iranian governement and north korea as a threat. Why ? Well, Iranian just want bomb Israëli people. This is cleary not an act of peace or selfdefence and I cant approve that.
c3rveja 1 year ago
"oh shit" lol!
THELAUREN12ist 1 year ago
Okay.. let's say we give up our nukes.. and now we have no way to defend ourselves.. so now anyone with a nuke.. can tell us what to do.. - I think this is a no brainer.. it doesn't matter who is good or bad.. it's about whoever has the bigger bomb gets to tell the other person what to do.. and I'd rather it be us..
duhman024 1 year ago
@duhman024 thank u
mattyworld2 1 year ago
Part 1
OMG. Pple it's not a matter of good guy or bad guy.
My personal view would be more concerned with science, philosophy and sociology [This topic is BIG]
But since very few pple would care to hear such views, I'll represent a more "up to standard" opinion. [of course depending on some standards this still will not be justifying.]
[since the comment was too large it was divided into two parts.]
HomaNama 1 year ago
Seriously, would you teach that to our children once we are married??
ahuizotl8 1 year ago
I'm the good guy. I'm the only one who should have nuclear weapons so all the rest of you evildoers would have to PHEAR ME!!
daBlackBaron13 1 year ago
Russia, China and the USA aren't gonna use these weapons (still a scary thought that they exist)!
The middle east has shown over and over that they are unbalanced and will kill at a drop of a hat.
I do not believe that these people would hesitate to use nukes if they had them..I mean they strap bombs to themselves and blow up innocent people ALL the time...
So why not nuke the world? Shit they would probable have people standing in line wanting to be strapped to the missiles
scorpionkings 2 years ago
@scorpionkings
Ya but we already seen you don't need missles and or nukes to cause chaos, good example of this is 9/11, they used planes for this
DaShadowInc 2 years ago
us women are sexy
IbnNero 2 years ago
I can't respect someone's perspective that it is ok to murder women and children with machetes because they are the wrong ethnic group, or living in the wrong place. There are some standards the people of the world follow. What you will notice is generally speaking, when someone acts against those moral standards, they do not say those standards are wrong, they rationalize why it is ok for them to not obey them at that time.
areformingamadon 2 years ago
Comment removed
yetialive 2 years ago
wow very wise girl, I'm impressed, glad that you are not just a good looking girl without consciousness
hozobo 2 years ago
There won't be peace until we either destroy ALL of them or ALL countries have them. The playing field would need to be leveled....
NinjaRunningWild 2 years ago
Loir....You need me to fuck you hard.
DarthCybie 2 years ago
It's the people with their fingers on the triggers to the bombs who get to decide who are the good guys and, yes, of course we all believe we're the good guys.
Silly rabbit.
Personally, nuclear weapons don't scare me near as much as biological weapons. It only takes $100K to setup a bio lab. 20K if your not concerned about safety. It takes a country to setup a nuclear program. A bio lab cab be setup in a small house. And once a bio weapon is let loose, you can't get it back.
miked7891 2 years ago
long live KIM JONG IL he's the good guy he's fighting imperialists
HomoLibero 2 years ago
"You bustin' my balls, Hans Brick!" lol...
daBlackBaron13 1 year ago
Oh, I know who the bad guy is: that bastard named Kim and all his friends.
Ironically, your bombs helped bring WWII to an end. I'm not saying it was not tragic; I'm saying ironically.
In a perfect world nobody has to have bombs. But this is not a perfect world. And it makes a world of difference who gets access to bombs. And I'd say put them all in the right hands. And by right hands I don't mean NKorea.
LittleJack15 2 years ago
cute, but not a talent.
Ebuverthebicepcurler 2 years ago
i totally agree resident
amness1a 2 years ago
Very well thought out Lori! Thanks gorgeous!
pilgrim4321 2 years ago
AWESOME videos!
Russisretard 2 years ago
Culture clash, the threat of the other, an eye for an eye, we'll all be blind. Irony, imperialist governments proclaim - the bomb is the only way to ensure a global peace - its not peace but an ongoing fear. I say let there be fallout, and through the ashes a new order will be formed. Now, this is why the bomb will never be dropped, not due to mass lost of life, when has government cared about that, But the social superstructure will be wiped out. and that's not good business.
toocoolcat 2 years ago
I like woman
Princegto 2 years ago
"when people have power, they will always be tempted to use that power."
lllHanzolll 2 years ago
Oh my God
Princegto 2 years ago
She's right!
FrekeOne 2 years ago
Surprisingly that made sense. No one should be aloud to have any type of weapon really if you look at it that way. We should just destroy all weapons.
krazienesss 2 years ago 2
I concur.
flyfisherX 2 years ago
Do you fail to realise that the only country to use a nuclear weapon was America.
fizzlemanizzle11 2 years ago 8
from what i think i think nobody has the right to use weapons so nobody will hurt anybody
enchovia 1 year ago
@enchovia i wish but it is all things nature for war and fighting humans are just the best at it
mattyworld2 1 year ago
@fizzlemanizzle11 thats true but for once there was good reason millions more people would have died if we did not
mattyworld2 1 year ago
@fizzlemanizzle11 - no one fails to realize that, brit. thanks for the news flash!
pbl1 1 year ago
Yes, it is too much to ask and expect from people. Not all of them are as educated or intellectual to think so deep into these matters, actually you make the president sound stupid now that you said "everybody thinks they are the good guys." that's so true. btw it's not always easy to think something from other's prospective.
kaziabir1 2 years ago
the USA is the biggest threat to the worldpeace, in fact they arent only a threat, they are destroying the world, fuck the bushes!
Martinez1887 2 years ago
Right... go ahead and ignore all the authoritarian regimes in Africa, the Middle East and Latin America then. Ask people in Ethiopia or Burma if America is "destroying the world".
Or, since you seem to be German - ask your East German counterparts just whose sphere of influence they would have preferred to have been under: the USA or the USSR.
MattyJames25 2 years ago
the usa destroyed most parts of southamerica,africa,middle east,india nd so on.
they even installed many dictators themselves, the USA is the reason that most countries are ppor, the usa cant live without robbing and massmurdering other ppl, also they dont allow africans medicine against HIV
Martinez1887 2 years ago 4
you are annoying
Merijnable 2 years ago 2
MY GOSH YOU ARE HOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
BeatleUniversity 2 years ago
calm down boy
we here all know she is attractive....
Kingtunice 2 years ago
the security counsil get to deside
this include china and russia who are not really fond of the usa however they agree that north korea is too unstable to be allowed to have such weapons
arga400 2 years ago
The SC gets to decide?
What a joke! The 5 countries that make up the permanent SC also happen to be the same five countries that sell the most weapons around the world. You gotta be shitting me here?
pepelapiu2004 2 years ago
SC=/=permanent security counsil also nukes and conventional weapons are completely different, inb4 no they are not i wanna see a conventional weapon making a whole city dissapear or 20 of them making a country colapse
arga400 2 years ago
I'd rather the U.S. have the slingshot than Kim Jong Il and Iran. And the U.S. will have to jump through a LOT of legal and political hoops before we use that slingshot.
But judging by your 9/11 conspiracy video and the JFK video you favorited, I'd say you're another one of those nuts that I can't have a reasonable discussion with.
ThaddeusWalters 2 years ago
I'm not scared of a kid who wants a slingshot. But I am worried about the kid who thinks he should be the only one on the block with a slingshot.
Being that the USA has the largest stockpile of nukelar weapons and being that the USA is to only one insane enough to have already used it TWICE on a civilian target. I certainly mistrust any American who claims the US should have a say on who gets the bomb and who doesnt.
pepelapiu2004 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nice work. keep it up. mean time come for social media marketing for esteembpo**com
kwoodward80 2 years ago
He seems to want to fire a missile early :)
The target is U.S.A :D
Because U.S.A. was "Korean War" and did genocide of 3,000,000 citizens.
If they succeed in a mass production, they around 200 will fire it :D
I worry about amerikkkan genocide heartily :D
norikaaz 2 years ago
I'm confused by this post.
ThaddeusWalters 2 years ago
So we should keep our nukes. I don't trust these dictators. But I do trust Barack Obama. America is fundamentally a good nation, a noble nation, and one that should maintain its arsenal.
ThaddeusWalters 2 years ago
I trust the U.S. having nukes because there are enough people that won't allow our arsenal to be used. Our democracy works. President Obama shares your beliefs. Our democratic election of this man should assuage any fears countries may have of America.
On the other hand, the Russian government is questionable. Akhmadenijad (however you spell it, I never used Hooked on Phonics) is almost solely in charge of his government. Kim Jong Il, too! There, a select few have access to the button.
ThaddeusWalters 2 years ago
> 'there are enough people that won't
> allow our arsenal to be useD"
Gimme a freakin' break!!!!! Maybe you never heard of a couple of places called Nagasaki and Hiroshima?
pepelapiu2004 2 years ago
In fact, the USA is the only state to be insane enough to have EVER used the bomb on a densely populated civilian target. Not once mind you, BUT TWICE.
Now you actually think your bosses can be trusted with the bomb while others should not be trusted with the bomb?
pepelapiu2004 2 years ago
Well, the next time we enter a world war on the same scale as WWII with a military draft, hundreds of thousands of U.S. casualties, etc. I'll come ask for your opinion on whether we should drop the bomb.
Your arguement is atrocious, comparing WWII to the current world.
Your president won't drop the bomb. And we've learned lessons since 1945--most of the world has learned lessons.
And yet again, I say that we would have a rebellion in the U.S. if nukes were again used.
ThaddeusWalters 2 years ago
>>And yet again, I say that we would have a >>rebellion in the U.S. if nukes were again used.
Don't be so sure of that. Nobody lifted a finger the first time your gubment nuked an entire city of CIVILIANS and still nobody lifted a finger when your gubment nuked yet one more entire city of CIVILIANS...... do you really believe the sleeping/dazed American people will lift a finger if the gubment decides to nuke, say Iran, for example?
pepelapiu2004 2 years ago
I AM sure of that. The situation's different: we were in a WORLD WAR with Japan. The current situation isn't even CLOSE!
As well, we live in a world of instantaneous communication. Pretty sure a LOT of people would lift ALL their fingers if the US government (with your Lord and Savior Barack Obama at the head) decided to unload its nukes on someone.
ThaddeusWalters 2 years ago
Which countries do we not mind having nukes? The U.S., the U.K., France, etc.
Not Russia, with its shady government. Not Pakistan and India, who have them aimed at each other and have governments run questionably. And especially not those countries run by dictators (who hate the US).
It's not that these countries think they're right. Their GOVERNMENTS think THEY are right.
ThaddeusWalters 2 years ago
the guy with the bigger gun.
kalavasaa 2 years ago
Hatred begets more hatred and war solves nothing but to destroy. *shakes her head sadly*
silentsoliloquy82 2 years ago
I don't trust any government that has nuclear weapons including my own country.
silentsoliloquy82 2 years ago 2
It doesn't. Japan and the USA committed their fair share of atrocities like many other countries. (Japan against the Chinese, USA against the Japanese for example.)
silentsoliloquy82 2 years ago
Which is why I am against any country having nukes, people can not be trusted with this kind of destructive force.
P47RICK 2 years ago
I am against any country having them, too.
silentsoliloquy82 2 years ago
Nice Video!
Just as i asked ;)
Shockwav3Z 2 years ago
This new green background is awful!
mswirr 2 years ago
I'm a bad guy... a very bad guy..
sammone1001 2 years ago
Girl, you mouth is completely full of truth.
304473108 2 years ago
The fact of the matter is that none of these nations are good or bad. They are just looking out for their own interest, and NK jeopardises those interest what ever it may be. And as such NK would be seen as a rogue nation until it conforms.
omegakurt20 2 years ago
North Korea wants to leverage itself out of the economic sanctions which were put up against her. I don't support their behavior but I do understand that every other country on the axis of evil which complied to Americas demands was screwed over. Iraq was safe all throughout the 90s when they did have weapons of mass destruction but when Hussein wanted to get the sanctions lifted and let UN inspectors in, the us invaded.
P47RICK 2 years ago 2
Iran signed a non-proliferation treaty ( the same Germany and Japan signed too) and complies to it but as soon as it was signed the US and Israel demanded they use no Nuclear technology at all and constantly threaten Iran with Invasions.
Maybe if America kept to it's word like Europe does other countrys would be more inclined to work with us.
P47RICK 2 years ago
though what you say mabye true it is none the less irrelivent...first of all Europe is a piece of baby crap who always puts a stink in things mabye if they would intervien sometimes and not just sit on their asses all the time mabye this wouldnt happen either mabye if they would help with the conflic between isreal and other places we wouldnt have to interfer thanks have a nice day :)
codyinclover 2 years ago
Europe does support Israel, they just don't support the killing of innocent civilians. Maybe you should read up on what Europe does in the world before criticizing it.
P47RICK 2 years ago
Whoever posted this video is either incredibly naïve or she has not yet realised the basic fundamental of world politics. It is as follows, whoever has the gold makes the rules. America along with most of the countries that deplored the NK nuclear test are very wealthy. And as such wield great influence over world affairs. Moreover none of these countries can claim moral enlightenment. In my opinion there is no civilised nation on earth...
omegakurt20 2 years ago
Fail.
Kim Jong Il doesn't respect "the right to have your own perspective". He runs a slave state which he openly intends to expand into South Korea; that's what makes him dangerous.
You, my dear, are part of the problem.
Guncriminal 2 years ago
I agree with that but most people don't see communism as a threat because they associate all forms of socialism as a pro middle-class idealogy. What they don't know is that communism is the parent idealogy of HItler's National Socialism and Mussilini's Fascist state.
timbosforporn 2 years ago
Just because 2 bad people believed in it doesn't mean its as evil as they are.
dalailama83 2 years ago
us citizen just talking always,never gonna improve with eating junk alot.
white loser's paradise japan is retarded supporter for US.
ugly shits r giving US army.
sunshineflag 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You need to get fucked hard.
swbjamz 2 years ago
Comment removed
Raptoreyes 2 years ago
Going forward the worst threats come from China which is economically free but has few checks and balances at the political level. The United States has also seen a very bad erosion of its checks and balances since the 1960's which could push the US into the definition of a fascist state. Nuclear weapons are not a problem... centralized political systems lacking checks and balances are the real deadly threat to life on this planet.
Raptoreyes 2 years ago 2
Logic is only good when put in historical perspective. You can sound really good in debate class with all these "moral equivalence" assumptions... That is until you compare the historical record of democratic republics vs the various form of tyranny to blight the earth. Republics can possibly use nuclear technology responsibly while dictatorships, simply cannot do anything responsibly. Without checks and balances power will corrupt the most angelic every time. Just read history!
Raptoreyes 2 years ago
Reality is separate from human perception. America upon inventing atomic weapons used them precisely 2 times and only because the Japanese appeared likely to fight to the last citizen. America could have used the technology to basically take over the world but instead just helped their former enemies rebuild after WWII and allowed the various regions to more or less govern themselves while allying against the nations that the Soviet Union over ran by force. Admirable restraint unique in history
Raptoreyes 2 years ago 2
Thank you very much Raptoreyes. I'm actually tired of the idea that a nation opposes us and poses a real threat....so we eliminate the threat & rebuild the nation. Huh? We free a country from an oppressive regime that tortures and kills people just for fun, then we expect nothing in return.
tinycrack 2 years ago
Thank you because its hard to swim against the tide of opinion and we cannot silently agree with those we support. Being a silent majority is no good because radicals ignore anything that is not an immediate threat to them and deal harshly with anything that is. Being proactive in speaking up can prevent bad ideas from simply flowing into a media vacuum. Speaking in support of gives comfort to those who took the first risks of contentious debate. Again thanks!
Raptoreyes 2 years ago
The question is not who is a bad guy, and who is a good guy. The question is how are you going to protect yourself against those that would harm you and your family. The president is responsible for protecting the american people. If there is a person who has a gun, are you going to use sticks and stones to protect your self, or are you going to use something stronger than what he has. In a perfect world, there would be no nukes, but I agrre you are idealistic and thats ok.
ebalida 2 years ago
What if Hitler had nukes on the noses of a few V-2 rockets? Would London still be a UK city?
So yeah, just let everyone have nuclear weapons. Then see how long it takes someone to push the button out of hate for another country.
HunterXray 2 years ago
You mean he would have done the same as the Americans have done to nakasaki and hiroshima?
You have only proved her point.
P47RICK 2 years ago
Is that why the US used nukes? Because we hated Japan?
And all along I thought it was to stop Japan from trying to take over the whole Pacific ocean. The Japanese attacked the US. But your comment didn't seem to take that into account.
We fire bombed their cities and they didn't stop. Next would have been an invasion of the Japanese mainland.
They sent kamikaze attacks against our ships and carriers.
It's not like we just decided one day to go bomb Japan because we hated her.
HunterXray 2 years ago
Nobody said the US did it because they hated Japan, Hitler didn't hate England either. And what difference does it make? America used WMDs on civilians which is a crime regardless of all your attempts to justify it.
I would really like to see your reactions if terrorists nuked the US and then used excuses like yours to justify it.
P47RICK 2 years ago 3
Well said.
dalailama83 2 years ago
Comment removed
silentsoliloquy82 2 years ago
Er...you realize Japan was trying to work out a cease fire, with the Soviets and Allies right? And they Nuked civilians?
It was more of a test than anything.
dalailama83 2 years ago 2
"The Japanese attacked the US."
They bombed a military port in Hawaii.. America responds by dropping nuclear weapons on civilian cities.
The tens of thousands of women and children who were killed in those cities never fired a shot against America.
"They sent kamikaze attacks against our ships and carriers. "
Yes and America sent suicide missions of it's own. What is your point?? How does that justify what America did at Nagasaki or Hiroshima??
madhammudeux 2 years ago
You make it sound like the US went straight up to Japan and dropped nuclear weapons as the very next action. I know that's not what you think, but that's how your response to me saying they bombed us looks.
I wonder how long the war in the Pacific would have dragged on for if the US hadn't used nuclear weapons.
"They bombed a military port in Hawaii" Yes they did. Seems like an act of war to me. What? Just don't respond, like some vegetable? Make them think the US will just sit? NOT!
HunterXray 2 years ago
The war in the pacific was already lost to the Japanese by the time the Nukes fell. Those bombs had nothing to do with Japan, they were just an excuse to show the Soviets the military strength of the United States. The dropping of those bombs had more to do with the situation in Europe than in Asia.
200k + lives just to flex some muscle.
madhammudeux 2 years ago
Of course without the nuclear detonations the Soviets may have been inclined not to stop at Berlin and keep rolling Westwards. Considering the immense size of their military at the time, the allies would have had a hard time stopping them getting all the way to France. Nuclear weapons changed the situation somewhat.
Whether the Russians would have ever pushed West, we shall never know, but the fact remains that Truman was worried about it and ordered the Nuclear field tests as a result.
madhammudeux 2 years ago
(I WILL concur with this.)
ThaddeusWalters 2 years ago
Not necessarily. We were either going to lose lots of men through our invasion of Japan or allow them to lose lots of civilians through the bomb. This way, the Japanese lost, instead of both sides losing perhaps MORE than the 200k lives of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
ThaddeusWalters 2 years ago
I am well aware what it was planning and Japan committed horrible atrocities against the Chinese, but it doesn't excuse the massive overkill that the United States government did to the Japanese. There is no honour in killing and harming non-combatants.
silentsoliloquy82 2 years ago
The perception at the time was a whole nation totally backing its emperor from women trained to kill solders with bamboo spears and children trained to run at solders with grenades. American commanders foresaw a fight against the entire Japanese population more or less instead of just the comparatively small military and political apparatus.
Raptoreyes 2 years ago
Good point. The war was one of escalation that convinced the American commanders that their would be no surrender without the emperor first being shocked enough to personally surrender. Some Japanese solders/civilians that did not hear the emperors surrender order were still hiding out well into the 1970's ready to die for their emperor. Talk about a proof of concept.
Raptoreyes 2 years ago
God bless the USA's military. God bless the USA. Peace through strength. Funny how people want to run a nation differently than they would run their own household/family.
tinycrack 2 years ago
Yes, let's just throw away all of our defensive equipment. I'm sure if we throw away all of our bombs, guns, weapons, aircraft, electronic countermeasures, etc, then the world would be safer and no one would want to kill us or others. The whole world would be a safer place if we stopped defending ourselves. ROFL. Go smoke some more weed.
tinycrack 2 years ago
Good point. The wolfs among us will only be encouraged if the peaceful among humanity appear to weak to defend themselves... indeed bullies start by looking for the easy prey on the playground or among the nation states.
Raptoreyes 2 years ago
i agree with just about all of this...just a bit too idealistic...
arsepoetica71 2 years ago
I agree with you. I a wonderful world where we can bounce around on the clouds & hug everyone, this is a great idea, but then a terrorist knocks on your door....then your jerked back into reality. It's a noble thought though.
tinycrack 2 years ago
lik my bals!!!
rlaenen27 2 years ago
For those who don't get it: Lori is reporting for a news service called "Russia Today". Is this news from a Soviet...um, I mean, Russian perspective...?
paaj1102 2 years ago
REALLY! Funny how she didn't mention that. You might have also said, "soviet...um, I mean, Russian...I mean COMMUNIST." :) The truth is now known.
tinycrack 2 years ago
Oh, one last thing: Who gets to decide who's a good guy and who's a bad guy? Answer: Nobody from Canada. You're not really part of the world stage, so you may as well stop pretending already...
paaj1102 2 years ago
So, let's play a game (for all you indoctrinated bozos). This game is called, "What's Wrong With This Country??" You've spent your whole lives deciding what is wrong with America... Now, spend a few minutes making a list of What's Wrong With the Following...(be impartial now)...
a) Russia
b) Cuba
c) Venezuela
d) Iran
e) Syria
f) China
g) North Korea (not just a worker's paradise, but a GEN-YOO-INE hell hole for the poor bastards that have to starve to death in their fields).
h) more?
paaj1102 2 years ago
"Who's going to decide who's the bad guy and who's the good guy?"
This muppet above me, paaj1102.
RebornAc3 2 years ago
What's wrong with Venezuela? It's basically the only example of socialism, with a free and democratic process. They aren't evil and they don't have nukes. Honestly they are a world benchmark for socialism.
b0b0maj0 2 years ago
We can't really help what's wrong with those other countries...certainly not by force, although I doubt the US will ever learn that lesson, but here's a quiz for you:
1. Name all the countries in the world that have nuclear weapons.
2. Name every country in history who has ever actually USED one...
who is the real threat?
arsepoetica71 2 years ago
I'll make this simple: YOU ARE STUPID!
In the grand scheme of things, you are an insect and the people who control the world are the boot. I wonde who will win...? Thank God the world isn't run by 20 year old bimbos.
paaj1102 2 years ago
Jesus fucking Christ!!!!!!! You are a stupid bimbo!!!!!!
"Ya know, North Korea, I just don't, like, get why, like, you don't, like, like, us, and all..." Maybe some of you dumb fucks might like to read a book on the Korean War, for instance. Like, Google, like David, like Halberstam, like, you know? And like, maybe. like, you can gain, some, like, total grasp of some, like, historical shit, you know. Crazy!
paaj1102 2 years ago
Your profanity lessens your credibility, but I certainly agree with you. The attitude this woman has is a dangerous one. Terrorist nations & groups, communist nations, etc love to hear Americans talk like she's talking. China is salivating.
tinycrack 2 years ago
Yes i totally agree with Lori..no one should be having it.. but in reality this whole issue is too complicated.. Despite of all the progress weve made over the centuries it is so unfortunate to see that most of the bombardment came from the most developed countries.. so if they are doing so why r we so appalled to see the underdogs doing it.
hawkmoon6 2 years ago
Everyone needs a BAD GUY just to assume their own behavior... So believe that Satan exist and everything will be much more easier for ya... But be open-minded and travel is another solution...
farfet56 2 years ago
Got milk? Good, because you don't 'gots any of dems dings called grammars'
jjasonwrght 2 years ago
Hi fairly complete stranger I have been watching you for far too long Missy Resident-though maybe it's all your fault for being far too appealing? Anyway just a post to say I want YOU to have all the nuclear weapons and dispose with them as you will as my sentiments have overcome my reason like most people. I mean Obama is OK but not in your league, and as for Kim he is too Jung "ILL" by far. Anyway in my country NZ we have no nukes so this is delightfully academic for us. Keep it up, kiddo!
queny2 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
oh my goodness woman you are so liberal. ill tell you what how about we disarm the american population from guns too because i know police will take care of everything. ill just happily watch as my wife gets raped by a bad guy with a gun who didnt turn in his weapon when the american population was informed that guns are illegal. Because i know everything will be fine when the cops get there. ULTIMATELY WE CANT DISARM OUR NUCLEAR CAPABILITIES WOMAN BECAUSE THE BAD GUYS WONT!
cyano0126 2 years ago
Comment removed
150cgy 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Yeah... You definitely didn't listen to a word she said. You didn't even TRY to get her point. So please, stop being condescending, it just makes YOU look ridiculous.
150cgy 2 years ago
Over 50,000 Americans personal experience who lost their lives fighting North Korea in the 1950's pretty much decides who gets the nukes and who doesn't. Lil' Kim can have his nukes... but America will take care of the delivery.
gizmogadsby 2 years ago
What the fuck is so noble about americans invading other countries and trying to dictate culture to other people? Never mind don't even answer, you're just an idiot who I am putting on display with your idiocy..
LittleEmoBoy001 2 years ago
Agreed :) Haha
jjasonwrght 2 years ago
Yup! I agree.
tinycrack 2 years ago
I think that America and all of America's allies should decide. UK and England would be big ones.
Chewbyy14 2 years ago
My reading of history convinces me that most bad government results from too much government.
Thomas Jefferson
apocolypse11 2 years ago 2
Lori, that's a very intelligent, mature perspective.
And personally, I think that the more you watch nature shows, the easier it is to understand human behavior and interaction. We're nothing more than incredibly intelligent monkeys fighting over pieces of the ground, to paraphrase a Tool song.
I'm still hoping that in the next few centuries, we finally realize that we're all stuck with each other on this slab of rock, and start working for PEOPLE, not corporations or individual egos.
martini1179 2 years ago 3
USA decides who is bad and who is good.
oyvnes 2 years ago
My fucking cock decides who is bad and who is good. Shut the fuck up.
LittleEmoBoy001 2 years ago
Don't feed the trolls/memorable idiots.
martini1179 2 years ago
Your a tard. Its these kind of Americans who make the rest of the world hate the USA.
jjasonwrght 2 years ago
I ment it ironic. I hate Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowits and the rest of the war crimals assholes.
oyvnes 2 years ago
Your profanity is proof of your character. If there were any legitimate war crimes committed, there would be trials. There were no trials because there were no issues. You are just repeating bumper-sticker phrases & mantras your masters have ordered you to say.
tinycrack 2 years ago
Stereotipically stupid. God, no wonder the USA is and has been doing so much shit in it's short history... Honestly, the world would be a better place without the USA and it's alarmingly retarded population, specially you, you 44 year old waste of bones and tissue.
castravetele 2 years ago
Go Europe.
P47RICK 2 years ago
So sad. The base side of my humanity is tempted to attack your intelligence, age, country or humanity using name-calling as you have done....but I will not sink to your level. I'll remain on the topic because I have not run out of intellectual ammunition as it seems you have. I'm sure you're doing the best you can, so God bless ya. :)
tinycrack 2 years ago
i bet you don't even know where my country is on a map.... so don't talk about intelligence, because you look rediculous...
castravetele 2 years ago
Well...when a person can't even SPELL ridiculous...
tinycrack 2 years ago
you try speaking 5 languages without any type-os, genius...
castravetele 2 years ago
Nonsens. Of course they are war criminals. But they are not investigated. And then you cant prove it in a court of law.
oyvnes 2 years ago
It is spelled "nonsense." So I assume you are a lawyer or with the JAG office and you have the classified information dockets for all of these individuals.
tinycrack 2 years ago
I am norwegian so my english is not perfect. But thanks for your remarks. It's telling me a lot about you.
oyvnes 2 years ago
Thank you. I'll take it that you see that I believe in dignified speech that respects others' opinions even if we disagree with them. Looking at your profile it seems you disagree with me, but you have that right. God bless ya.
tinycrack 2 years ago
Of course they aren't inherently a threat to peace in the hands of a regime actually interested in peace. Sometimes you have to shut down people who endanger peace on a broader scale. You would't say a policeman's gun inherently threatens murder; rather, the idea is that it's there to stop someone when no other way exists to save a life.
Arguments against nuclear weapons in general are wastes of time.
Arguments against keeping them away from North Korea are common sense.
Irrenmann 2 years ago
i say either everyone has them or no one has them. this puts every place on the planet in equal danger.
agentx250 2 years ago
man, we need to upgrade our missile defence system.
vololoo 2 years ago
It's all relative from a theoretical point of view but the bad guys tend to be self-serving and don't like working for others.
Best response? Don't help them.
Did you know that Descartes refused to publish his book on physical science, Le Monde, after hearing about the trial of Galileo by the Inquisition? Afterwards he favored experimental observation over theory. And was less willing to share what he knew with others. It is likely there were others who also shared this perspective.
httprover 2 years ago
by the first part almost every (if not every) country is "bad" since each one only wants whats best for itself never thinking of the rest of the world.
as to the second who helps anybody as it is? almost the only time one country helps another is when it benefits the country helping
agentx250 2 years ago
You couldn't be more right, Lori. Bad guys will always think others are the bad guys.
FtKiVeR 2 years ago
by that logic every one is a bad guy
agentx250 2 years ago