Added: 3 years ago
From: freestylinkale
Views: 36,316
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (366)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Comment removed

  • Here's a link from factcheckDOTorg. This is a site that does REAL fact checking, not partisan bullshit. They correct lies told about Republicans, Democrats, Libertarians, and independents. They verify negative and positive truths about both parties. Only a fringe retard would question their objectivity. Here is the link:

    dubyadubyadubyaDOTfactcheckDOT­org/2008/11/obamas-national-se­curity-force/

  • @firegod001 funded by the Annenberg Foundation.. you truly are a piece of ignorant work. They're just as unbiased as snopes. Do some responsible research, you lazy moron.

  • @brothermoon he did do responsible research. he listened to what was said in context BEFORE jumping to stupid conclusions, unlike YOU! now go back to being brainwashed by fringe conservatives!

  • @marlajameson your statement isn't even relevant to the situation. way to butt in and illustrate your idiocy.

  • @brothermoon No, it was very relevant. The link I posted was not research. The research I did was to actually listen to what the man said in context, just like Marla said.

  • @firegod001 the research i'm referring to (geez i have to even explain THIS to you) is to know your sources... factcheckdotorg is no unbiased source. find out who funds organizations and follow the money and ideology trail.

  • @brothermoon What you don't comprehend is that one can be a liberal and still fund unbiased organizations. You can be a conservative and do that as well. You can even RUN such organizations and be completely unbiased. In this world where so many of us are biased, unreasonable and intellectually dishonest, it's understandable that people wouldn't realize that. In fact, it's the most reasonable mistake you've made in this entire flame war. You're still acting like a clown, though.

  • @firegod001 yes, moron.. that *is* possible. but to know better, you'd have to actually have examined the organization that is funded to know what their track record of being unbiased is... something which is patently obvious you're too lazy to do. combine that with false accusations of my saying things i didn't and you have no integrity or reasonable position.

  • @brothermoon I didn't do that. I repeatedly mentioned you taking the side of those who ARE saying certain things over and over, and I said that in EFFECT, in the context of the video, you actually did say it, and you really did. You either are too crazy to realize it, or are one of the most dishonest people I've come across in a very long time.

  • @firegod001 or maybe some kind of combination of craziness and dishonesty? that certainly seems to be the case! i think it's true of most of these "civilian national security force" imbeciles.

  • @marlajameson you and firegod001 take whatever Obama says at face value... go ahead. he's already proven himself to be a liar, a hypocrite, and lacking integrity. only fools don't learn and wouldn't bother questioning his words, intentions, and the titles of seemingly benign programs and policies.

  • @brothermoon now you're doing it to me! i do not take what he says at face value. but when i listen to what he said in context, i realize that he was talking about volunteer work including college students helping out kids. and when people call him hitler, saying he's building a gestapo, and you take their side, you look like a complete imbecile and asshole! as far as the rest of your post goes, you mean he's actually a politician??? who knew???

  • @marlajameson when you take what he said in context, there's no credible explanation that you're giving or that was given by his surrounding comments to justify a civilian national security force that is "just as well funded" and "just as strong" as our military. i didn't 'take the side' of those calling him hitler or say he's building a gestapo - i replied to a statement indicating he's treasonous, and agreed with that assessment.

  • @brothermoon that's because he wasn't ACTUALLY calling for that! oh my god!!! maybe you're really just this stupid???

  • @marlajameson It's okay, Marla. If people like this clown were to be consistent, they would claim that I'm threatening your life if you and are joking around, you poke me and then I say I'm going to kill you with a big joking grin on my face. He'll never get what Obama is saying here, because he's just that too far gone.

  • @firegod001 apparently!

  • @firegod001 you two are really sad examples of the irrationality of those without the ability to comprehend sentence structure and contextual meaning...let alone, meaning determined by grammatical phrases.

    so you both are denying Obama's calling for a civilian national security force that is just as powerful, strong, and well-funded as the military. whatever your dream state is telling you he means by civilian national security force.. fine. but just as well funded as the military?

  • @brothermoon just.... wow!

  • @marlajameson but you and your other cohorts here of the same ideology obviously have no problem with government claiming to be the solution to our problems, and are eager to be a part of such a nationalist political set of groups led by central planners establishing their dictates for everyone's lives. wow is right... such blind, uneducated, foolish stupidity and entrenched lack of critical thinking on your parts.

  • @brothermoon i didn't say anything like that! jesus christ you sure do allow yourself to get completely deluded by your extremism don't you?

  • @marlajameson using critical thinking to examine the policies and proposals of a government and its administration and how they can be used, abused, or misused is not extremism... you certainly are more comfortable being naive, ignorant, and unengaged while just taking things at face value from politicians. that's ridiculous, irresponsible, and utterly stupid.

  • @firegod001 and in my opinion... that is treasonous to the founding principles of our nation.

  • @marlajameson are you really this brain dead? listen to and read his statement - he called for a "civilian national security force that is just as powerul, just as strong, just as well-funded"... as what? as the military. what do you think he was referring to by saying 'just as...' ?? learn some grammar and comprehension skills. good grief you're dense.

  • @brothermoon it was a metaphor! if i say i'm going to put my studying on the back burner, am i saying i'm going to put my books on the back coil of my stove? if i say i'm going crazy when someone is merely annoying me, are you going to take me seriously? and what about not spending such crazy amount of money on our military? what about the desire to have how much people spend on charity be more than how much we spend to blow people up? i guess that would be too much to ask for!

  • @marlajameson now you're thinking... good start. what's WRONG with having some sort of government led civilian national force with volunteers (or some sort of entitlement funding) to do the work the government decides is charitable, just, and fair? and just as well funded as the military? you're supporting the creation of a redundant cycle of nationalistic politicism... read the definition. it's sounding alot like fascism: radical authoritarian nationalist political ideology.

  • @marlajameson if you don't know what's WRONG with creating a nationalistic political set of groups to do the work the central planning government determines is charitable, fair, and just, then there is no hope for you. history has been lost on the likes of your kind, forever doomed to repeat its failures.

  • @marlajameson and if you bothered to do any research on the policies Obama has produced and engaged in thus far, you'd see that this is exactly what he's been doing - one such example is the language buried within the Patient Protection Affordable Care Act, page 1312: SEC. 5210. the problem with such government led groups is that they are politicized and can quickly and easily lead to something closer to fascism than freedom.

  • @marlajameson LMFAO You two are tearing this guy a new asshole.

  • @OptimalDelusion1 says the asshole with his simpleton mind.

  • @firegod001 there's no 'in effect'... i didn't say it in any context and it couldn't be presumed by any rational, reasonable person to have been said or meant. stop trying to cover up your intellectual dishonesty.

  • @firegod001 now go play like the ignorant clown puppet you're portraying yourself to be... your chronic mental issues affect any rational discussion and thus are a waste of my time.

  • Cute, idiot. You mischaracterize what I say because your tiny brain can't process the information and what it entails. You lost reality and rational thinking long ago when you decided to trust this man ignore the hypocrisy, lies, and deceit so prevalent in his administration's actions and policies. Read the bills instead of gulping up the party line of talking points. Your lazy zombie mentality is pathetic.

  • @brothermoon No, that's not what I'm doing, you moron. I don't care for Obama either, but when you 100% take the side of those calling him the next Hitler, using a distortion of a metaphor he used when talking about how we need to do more volunteer work, then you earn the ass beating you are now getting. So sorry for your luck, dipshit.

  • @firegod001 and this is where you eat your words, incompetent. i didn't say he was attempting to create a gestapo - those were your words and accusation. more idiocy from your challenged brain. you have a listening, reading, comprehension, and reasoning problem. get some medication and help, moron.

  • @brothermoon No, you just completely took the side of the people who ARE saying he was going to build a gestapo and be the next Hitler. In effect, you did indeed say it, whether you will admit it or not.

  • @firegod001 wrong. typical of you to put words in someone's mouth and then start claiming they said it. cut and past my comment you're claiming i said. you can't because i didn't. the only claim i made was yes, that in other times Obama would be treated severely for his acts of treason and treachery. but alas, your ability to comprehend is impaired. take your meds now.

  • @brothermoon Unfortunately for you, saying something like that in the context of listening to a 20 second clip so many people are calling proof of a gestapo on the way, is vile, dishonest, treasonous, irrational tripe that deserves to be laughed at, which is why you are being owned right now. Take your medicine and deal with it.

  • @firegod001 sadly, your lack of comprehension, lack of research, lack of knowledge, and lack of recall means you can't even have a functional, rational conversation or argument because you distort reality and facts according to your chronic path of lunatic idiocy. it's okay.. you can do it. grab hold of reality and you can get closure. your nonsense babbling is only a symptom of the mental anguish that troubles you. deal with reality and stop the lies.

  • @brothermoon Keep telling yourself that.

  • @firegod001 keep projecting.

  • Barack Obama's words to promote his image as Community Organizer in Chief were not about forming a paramilitary force of volunteer brown shirts. They were about turning America into one, giant, community organizer's sandbox at enormous cost to taxpayers.. and with little accountability. Get a grip, firegod001.

  • Bunch of fucking morons.... This was a metaphor, talking about how people should join the Peace Corps and do other volunteer work, that as important as it is to join the military, it is just as important to serve your country as a citizen. It was NOT talking about an actual civilian security force. If you had seen this in context, you would have known that, but instead, you bought an out of context, fictional, 20 second clip like a bunch of fucking dingbats. Just amazing.

  • @firegod001 People who talk in metaphors outta shampoo my crotch.

  • @BuffaloTPU LOL At least you aren't acting like a brainwashed retard, propagating a lie that this man is building a gestapo or something. Very funny comment. Thanks.

  • and his security force is these mobs going around and beating up whites , and he dropped all charges against the new black panther leader ..this is way out of control , people needs to wake up fast!

  • Enter = TSA and the end of your rights.. this is just the beginning.

  • fkn Hitler Obama

  • @jabames You said it man.

  • To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the militia, and for governing such part of them as may be employed in the service of the United States, reserving to the states respectively, the appointment of the officers, and the authority of training the militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;

    Article 1 Section 8

  • You are ALL retarded! This clip was taken COMPLETELY out of context! Watch the whole speech and you'll see he's saying NOTHING about any sort of militia.

  • No, you estrogen enriched numbnuts. Listen to the Marine. He knows. We already HAVE a civilian security force, it's called a POLICE FORCE. Anything else smacks of a dictatorship. Look up The Sicherheitsdienst or SD.(No, I'm not going to do it for you). Some of you need to get out a little more often. Go to Nigeria or Sierra Leone (been there) and see how they do things. And your reading assignment is Franz Kafka.

  • Look at all the tools cheering and clapping for him.

  • Watch how these "civilians" will be trained with weapons,issued rifles,issued uniforms and have their hair cut short...

    It's called a draft.

    I'm anxious that these young gullible inner city goons will be sent to the homes of US citizens in order to collect their guns.

    This former Marine can't wait...

  • @dgl1962 You can't wait to shoot "inner city goons"?

  • @AmericaDevil I said I can't wait until they're sent to the homes of US citizens in order to collect their guns...

  • @dgl1962 This former US Army Ranger is not "an inner city goon". This former US Army Ranger wants our country back and will help take it back from anti-government traitors who want to start a civil war. This former US Army Ranger is not alone.

    This former US Army Ranger can't wait...

  • @dgl1962 You can't wait to kill people? That shows how great a person you are, huh? You're a fucking moron. Who's coming for you? The Peace Corps? If you idiots weren't so dangerous, I'd be laughing my ass off at you right now.

  • @firegod001 When did I say that "I can't wait to kill people"?

    Who's the fucking moron now?

  • @dgl1962 You are. You actually believe that the Peace Corps and other volunteer groups Obama was referring to are going to come and try to take your guns away. Holy Christ, yes, I'd say that's pretty fucking moronic. And yes, you did say you can't wait to kill people. Nice try, though.

  • @firegod001 "And yes, you did say you can't wait to kill people. Nice try, though."

    And no, you still haven't shown me where I said that, nice try though.

  • @dgl1962 What couldn't you wait for, then? To give them your manly growl? Fucking idiot.

  • @dgl1962 I don't feel stupid at all. I do, however, feel a little enjoyment at watching you delude yourself into believing that. We all know what you were saying, and we all know that you were schooled. Nice try, though.

  • @firegod001 I would say "nice try" to you for trying to wiggle out from putting words in people's mouths, but you're too pathetic at backpedaling to receive it.

    Now run along and get humiliated by someone else, I'm growing weary of debating what must be a 12 year old.

  • @dgl1962 I didn't backpeddle one damn inch. Maybe you need to look that word up? You did make an ass out of yourself trying to claim you didn't say what we all know you said, though. I'd get a real kick out of watching you try to enjoy yourself in the kind of situation you described earlier. It would never happen, but if it did, I'd be laughing my ass off at your inept attempt at quenching your wackjob blood thirst...

  • How does the word civilian with the word military make anyone think this is a similar force to what Hitler had. How about the word 'military' alone in America... it's the highest funded army in the world... ran by the most corrupt superpower of the world. A little bit of civilian mixed in almost sounds like a good idea to me... civilians might not be the empty minded, brainwashed, gun toting jarheads that we have today... could change things a little bit... idk. Emphasis on "might"...

  • obammy licks balls

  • LOVE OBAMA

  • he's the same as the last guy.bought an paid for just like the last guy.

  • MORONS. It's a metaphor, so instead of finding the video IN CONTEXT, you geniuses just go ahead and keep on buying the BS ultra right-wing wack jobs like Savage are feeding you. Sit. Come. Roll over. Good boy.

  • Civilian....Shame on him for saying that....its all about the new world order....Obama, IS a narcissist, emily, he is not a psychopath but definitely displays narcissistic behaviour. ..... do they teach you about personality disorders at the academy????

  • Chilling.

  • what the hell?

  • God help us - and this guy was given a Nobel Peace prize - what a sick joke

    He is a lunatic .........

    L.O.V.E xx

  • @61barbie The Federal Reserve prints dollars and Nobel Prizes!!!!

  • I agree! He is Hitler. AntiChrist!

  • Know your enemy.

  • Dont we already have a civilian security force? I believe its called the militia.

  • no sir!!!!! according to homeland security the milita are "home grown terrorists"

    i think its bout time to feed the tree of liberty the blood of tyrants!!!!!

  • the real terrorists ? domestic? Obama only wants "domestic terror to be called terrorists

  • Obama's "civilian security force" that is more powerful than the military is exactly what Hitler did with his SS. Because the SS had more power than the normal german military, the SS purged that military through murder and the SS became the new power. Then it started brutally enforcing Hitler's edicts. Obama is to be politically and ideologically opposed by us "civilians".

  • The Corruption of America has nothing to do with Nazism. Stop relating it to Nazism. If you knew what Nazism was REALLY about then you would know it was nothing like the future plans of world enslavement. P.S. The U.N. is world's most corrupt organisation. And to think, they use peace as their excuse.

  • Man, this Obama guy is totally fucking crazy. It's like he's proposing some kind of police force or something!!! Who the hell wants that?

  • The Weather Underground, Acorn, Apollo Alliance, Americor, Storm,Bill Ayers, Van Jones, the Rathke brothers, Cass Suntein, Rev. Wright, Allowing Pelosi to trash our CIA, Not suppoting our troops in Aganistan. (more have died since O has been in office then since the war began) Gove take over Banks, Auto, and HC. Leaving farmers SOL in CA because of a fish? A civilian ARMY? Does anyone see the flipping big picture here? What kind of Americans really support this kind of crap?

  • Extremists = radicals + evil muslims. No; I'm not rascist. That wouldn't even make sense. Islam is a RELIGION, not a RACE. Most Muslims are actually Indonesian, not Arabs (and I have nothing against Indonesians except Islam).

  • wow USA "patriot" you've got some serious bigotry issues. Either that or you are seriously ignorant.

    Painting a civilization through the lens of warfare. Put yourself in their shoes. Tanks rumbling down their streets, American drones dropping bombs on their village wedding parties. I imagine they're mad as hell, yep. When people are mad, they don't tend to behave admirably.

    But they're human beings, just like you and me. And just as decent. Or indecent. Certainly no better or worse...

  • You know what, actually... All I see in your little self-righteous babbling here... is a big pile of cat-shit. I'll tell you why.

    When I refer to "those people" I don't mean all muslims, I mean extremists. Sorry to shatter your saintly ego. As to the peaceful people who're mad as hell... they're mad at the wrong side. That village wedding bombed was either done by the Taliban to make it appear to be American, or had numerous HVTs present. If they want it to stop, they should fight for it too.

  • Now, do I AGREE with the war in Iraq and Afghanistan? Hell no.

    Do you think I'm so insane, that I WANT my brother fighting over there? You have no clue what it feels like to see a dark colored car pull into your driveway, and then turn around and leave. You don't know what it feels like when he misses a chance to email to us. Or when you hear on the news that 3 died in southern Afghanistan. You have no idea, because if he dies, the only thing you lose is one rifle protecting you. I lose a lot.

  • you're a serious fuck-face. I bet you're suckin Michael Moore's dick and burning American flags too.

  • OK, this is out of context. He was talking about non-military objectives like the PeaceCorps. He's talking about missions overseas to educate people on the intentions of America so they'll know the truth instead of what their state-run media is telling them. Obama's idea is a good one, an altruistic one. Beck and his cronies are once again spoiling what would ultimately be very, very good for America. Shame on all of you.

  • What're you, spamming the same message everywhere?

    Why would you do that? What're you, in the White House?

  • I believe in the truth. If what people are implying was the truth, I'd be fighting against it. But it's not. It's just not. And I only had to search for less than two minutes to realize Obama isn't building an army against America. Less than two minutes. About the same amount of time it took Glenn Beck to tell you Obama wants to kill you for your beliefs.

  • I'm interested. Why do you automatically assume I'm some Republican nutball who watches Glenn Beck?

    Is that standard operating procedure? Did the possibility that I'm actually curious about something that didn't sound 100% kosher cross your mind?

    Or do you have a rubric hanging up that says: Agrees with President- support. Merely questions president- attack??

  • If you were genuinely curious you would have taken a few minutes to get the actual context of the quote before attacking it on a comment board. You say you're not a Republican nutball, you say you're just curious because it didn't sound kosher? I say you didn't do the proper research to get at the truth, I say you are a liar.

  • What? Now I can't ask a question? Hmm, I coulda sworn the Bill of Rights guarenteed me that right.

    Again, I'm curious, what is wrong with liberals? They can't accept questioning them? Must attack all questioners?

    Good job convincing me that the Democratic Party is is the most confident.

  • You weren't asking questions, you were saying Obama is building a military force to squash AMERICAN opposition. I welcome questions, I welcome debate. But I've given you the answer, I've proven that's not what Obama said. Yet you still continue saying I'M the one who is oppressing YOU. Accept the truth and move on with your life, man. You were wrong, get over it.

  • Really? Really?

    I want you to actually pull up my exact quote that said exactly that, dumbass.

    Please do. The only think you've proven... is that for some reason, Democrats seem to loathe being questioned. They'll do anything to avoid them... including attacking and changing the subject. Look at you, you're ordering me to "accept the truth and move on." How dare I question the almighty, huh?

    And this is still a democracy?

  • "So we are going to send -- we're going to send more college graduates to teach and mentor our young people. We'll call on Americans to join an Energy Corps to conduct renewable energy and environmental cleanup projects in their neighborhoods all across the country. We will enlist our veterans to find jobs and support for other vets, to be there for our military families."

  • " And we're going to grow our Foreign Service, open consulates that have been shuttered, and double the size of the Peace Corps by 2011 to renew our diplomacy."

    That's what he said just before that quote.

  • That's when he said:

    "We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."

  • National security isn't just brute force. It's also wiping away the rumors bred into the minds of citizens of nations that oppose us. Rumors that were put there by their militant, tyrannical governments. We need to fund programs that will send our civilians overseas to educate those people. Are you opposed to that? Force, combined with education wins wars.

  • That sounds great. Then, when they're grabbed by extremists, my brother gets to have his head blown off trying to save them.

    Nonono, I'm lovin it. You have no clue what their lives are like, the people you're gonna try to convince. Since the nanosecond they popped outta their mother, they've had this militant, extremist viewpoint drilled into them by their family. Their friends. Their religion. Mr. American comin' over isn't gonna magically change their minds. But he will get kidnapped.

  • Nobody will force them to go overseas. By your logic, we shouldn't have soldiers over there fighting for our freedoms because they might get killed. Here's some common sense... Your brother CHOSE to go to war. The people in the PeaceCorps CHOOSE to go to dangerous areas. They are both equally important and nobody is forcing them to do anything.

  • Wrong, we should have people fighting for our freedoms.

    What I'm saying is they should be carrying M-16 A4s, not pamplets about how great we are. Good job twisting my words.

    I'd much rather not have a bunch of PeaceCorps morons captured and require rescue, 'cause anyone with military experience knows a rescue op is suicidal. Oppfor has all advantages.

  • We need the M-16 A4s AND the "pamphlets", sir. We have to change the information getting to the people who are raised to hate us. If we start now, it will benefit America down the road.

    Let's say a man believe I want to kill his children. So he comes at me with all he's got and I knock him out. I won that fight but he'll be back again and again. Now if I show him proof I'm not gonna kill his kids there's a good chance we won't fight anymore. Get it?

  • I'll make you a deal. Go to Afghanistan, develop a strong education on the major situation we have there, understand their mentality, and THEN come back to me regarding your ingenious plan.

    I guarentee you it will not be the same, if there is one at all. It isn't that easy. You have NO experience in this field. Stop trying to pretend like your the fucking know-it-all, because until you're riding shotgun through the "Valley of Death" you are not an authority.

    Oh, and get owned.

  • So you're saying that since YOU think it won't work we shouldn't do it? You're saying "no, we can't". Thank God Thomas Jefferson and his crew didn't have your attitude. Anybody can say it's too hard. It takes courage to try anyway.

  • Yet again, you don't know what these people are like. Until you do, you'll be a prick who has this supreme-intelligence attitude, who can solve all the world's problems with a simple plan. How naive.

  • It takes a strong combination of a simple plan and a mighty force. Just ask our founders. It takes both, equally funded. Brains and muscle. Do you not agree?

  • What it takes is a balance, we must alway fight the security forces, at the same time as we are supporting them. The greatest threat to freedom is those patriots that put security above everything else. That is the heart of democracy, the thing that many people are afraid of, which is the freedom to say that our military and police have gone too far.

  • What is wrong with you? Do you think they're dogs? That they can be taught to stop biting people?

  • Our founding fathers fought against decent enemy. Today, we are fighting animals. It's like some apocalyptic horror film. Lemme make it clear for you... the extremists can't be tamed as easily as the infected New Yorkers in "I am Legend," and it took Will Smith a long time to make a cure.

    Lemme make it more clearn. You have entertainment in your life, like Xbox or Tv. They don't have electricity. They've got nothing better to do that kill Americans. It's like Medal of Honor to them. Okay?

  • This is a typical misconception of liberals. The idea that these are decent people, and that the only logical explanation for why they hate us is because America must be some evil country who murders and tortures.

    They hate us because we support Israel. They hate Israel because 4,000 years ago, a Jewish guy sneezed near a Muslim. Are you understanding? It's like "Lord of the Flies." Kids on an island will eventually kill each other without something to do. These people are no different.

  • ok fine, let's do it your way, without thinking, or applying our collective intellects (their's AND ours).....

    You go, USAPATRIOT!!! nuke 'em all!!! genocide! nuclear hell! yes, daddy!

    ...and after that? with the screams of those million dying children in your ears, how will you ever sleep at night?

  • They won't be crying because they'll all be dead. Nuclear bombs kill people, not leave them half-dead.

  • Thomas Jefferson would have had Obama shot already for treason.

  • "Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired is, in a sense, a theft from those who hunger & are not fed, those who are cold & are not clothed." (Dwight D. Eisenhower, April 16, 1953)

    Shut your hole djvdz66!

  • FEMA says the founding fathers were homegrown terrorists!!!!!  this revolution will be fed n UN troops vs patriots n christians!!!!

  • @djvdz66 Thomas Jefferson not only owned slaves, he was known for abusing them. So, of course Thomas Jefferson would have him shot because Thomas Jefferson was a racist fool who would have lived his life behind bars or six feet under in todays world.

  • @djvdz66 SEVERAL TIMES.

  • @brothermoon Bring it, douche nozzle. No? Because you'll get spanked just like the jizz boy who can't wait to kill people.

  • @firegod001 personal attacks are typical of people with limited critical thinking ability - you didn't listen to the quote one bit since it is quite clear exactly what Obama said in it regarding a 'civilian national security force'... that's far different from volunteering, or the Peace Corp, or any other misinterpretation you're contorting yourself into in order to rationalize. Nobody asked Obama exactly what he meant - which is the problem with many of the vague statements he makes.

  • @brothermoon There's no need to ask him, since when a reasonable person listens to him in context, it's completely clear what he meant. He was talking about the Peace Corps and other volunteer groups, and you simpletons claim he's building a gestapo! Yes, that's good enough reason to throw insults, when people are behaving so irrationally, unfairly, insulting, and completely idiotic as that.

  • @firegod001 A reasonable person using critical thinking would have researched and learned about his past and ideology before the 2008 election, and would recognize and make note of the time since the election where he's been a complete hypocrite and when he speaks out of both sides of his mouth. It's only those who deny reality that make unreasonable claims such as this statement is referring to the Peace Corp and groups that have nothing to do with 'national civilian security'.

  • @firegod001 And again you're refusing to hear his statement. He says this national security force must be just as powerful, strong, and well-funded as our nation's military. That's not a volunteer group by his own definition. A reasonable person would look at his record of attempting to subvert or dodge the Constitution and rule of law, the lack of his transparency, and determine that he's not credible and lacks integrity. So his statements like these require much scrutiny.

  • @brothermoon It was a metaphor, you dummy! A reasonable person would have gone, "Huh, what did he just say?" and then go and try to find the CONTEXT of what he said, which had everything to do with the Peace Corps and other volunteer groups, and NOTHING to do with any kind of gestapo. To not do the research is unreasonable and lazy. To have the context spelled out for you, and refuse to listen to reason in this particular case, is irrational to the point of lunacy.

  • @firegod001 Ignorant, aren't you? It proves my point that you aren't engaging in intelligent thinking or conversing. Just because you're not using critical thinking and continue to ignore any statement or reference to CIVILIAN NATIONAL SECURITY FORCE and it's funding (no.. not voluntary groups or Peace Corps) doesn't mean those who question his statement are lazy. It means you're drinking koolaid and have swallowed the lies & hypocrisy of this admin w/out sense. That's lunacy.

  • @brothermoon You're wrong. And the best possible explanation for how wrong you are about something so obvious, when listened to in CONTEXT (you know, when he was telling us to volunteer for the Peace Corps and other volunteer organizations just prior to and after his metaphor?) is that you are a fucking wack job. You are increasingly proving that the more you speak, so please do continue, moron.

  • that's a pretty twisted perspective. "Until you've seen combat, you know nothing'"?

    war is hell. doesn't matter who the enemy is, they're trying to kill you. it isn't pretty. they aren't going to be NICE about it. the nazis weren't, the japanese weren't, & the british weren't gentlemen during the revolution.

    the worst side of humanity is on display during war. it is the darkest side of our nature.

    I'm all for peaceful co-existence. fact is, so are the vast majority of "those people".

  • There's a degree of "niceness" buddy. Last time I checked, the Nazis didn't strap bombs on 4 year olds, and tell them to go hug an American soldier.

    Now the Nazis were evil fuckers, without exception. But after Bastogne, they're motivation to fight collapsed. They didn't want to fight anymore. These people will fight to the last, and I do say "these people" when describing the extremists, who are NOT interested in peace. Don't play with my words, as a courtesy.

    Civilians rarely understand.

  • Extremists? Evil Muslim terrorists!!!!

  • @OctoberRoad Well said. If people would just fact check, instead of leaping to idiotic conclusions about an out of context 20 second clip, they'd KNOW this already, but unfortunately, zealots act in extremely stupid ways.

  • Jeez... I'm a native citizen of Kraut-Land-Germany, and most of you nutheads aint gotta clue about Nazi History ...

    Sorry to say so, but I'm at the 'source', so plz stop rambling about Germany 60 years ago...

    The US of A is the new 4th reich.... looks like a duck, walks like a duck, quacks like duck... is a duck...

    We in Germany have a (very true) saying : 'The Party who wins the war, also decides on what gets written in the history books'

  • You are a liar. "Kraut-land-germany"?? Ich liebe in frankfurt fuck head.. Wie heißt du. Your not german. Say that in german retard.

  • Hehe, doch doch... Die 'Krauts' ist ein Ausdruck der im 2. Weltkrieg durch die Alliierten geprägt wurde, und ist die hämische Bezeichnung für einen Deutschen. Und apropos, ich leb' im Schwarzwald, und bedarf keiner Vulgärsprache um meinen Standpunkt zu verdeutlichen.

  • And by the way this clip of the speech was taking totally out of context. He is talking about giving more money to the freedom corps, peace corps, etc. He is saying that these programs, which are comprised of civilians, are just as important because of the goodwill they create, and they create improvements in diplomacy between countries. This is just a Sound bite that every Obama hater seems to worship. Watch the whole speech before you jump to conclusions.

  • American conservatives are concerned that this nation not come too close to the socialism of Nazi Germany, but it is the laws which work against collective bargaining and union activity which cause America to begin to resemble Nazi Germany, not any so-called socialist policies of this or that leftist group. Socialism might be an exceedingly bad way to organize an economy, but criticizing the Nazis is not the way to make this point.

  • its just comparing

    do you admit hitler was a national socialist?

  • No...I admit that was what he called himself, but as far as policies he implemented he was about as far from socialism as you can get.

  • i do agree that both italy and germany tried facism during world war ii, but hitler was a socialist in the beginning. going from far left to far right. but other than history, do you believe history will repeat itself?

  • Hitler pretended to be a Socialist to gain the support of a German people who had been hit hard by economic depression. To compare Obama to Hitler is, well, insane. FDR was more of a socialist than Hitler, and did he become a Hitler esque dictator...NO. So if Obama goes all eight years without becoming a Hitler type figure, like you seem to believe, will become a Democrat? Cause you soon will find out how wrong you are....

  • you seem so sure of yourself. the entire democrat platform is to gain power, not to help people

  • How can anyone describe a government that abolishes the right to strike or engage in collective bargaining as socialist? Mere opposition to Jewish materialism or Jewish capitalism doesnt make one a socialist.

  • Obama wants to start out slow with brownshirt brigade and socialist medicine...people better wake up before it's too late and the take-over of our rights is complete. Never before in the history of our country have we been FORCED to do anything against our will. HE is un-American.

  • "Never in our Country have we been FORCED to do anything against our will"

    Ever heard of the draft dude....

  • Impeach now.....

  • It became clear by 1942 to many in the Wehrmacht that Hitler needed to be taken out - But what prevented Model, Manstein & Rommel from rolling into Berlin to remove Hitler?

    Answer: The SS

    If you see my other video entitled, "Israel nuked Iraq", you would learn that 70% of the US military is against the US Government, (in fact, they fired on Paul Wolfowitz)

    Obama & his masters now look for a personal SS to protect them from their own generals

  • As long as they conscript pussies too, that doesn't bother me at all!

  • What ya gonna do with them? Border security ? I'd bet not.....

    AND TOMORROW WHEN WE WAKE UP IT WILL BE WORSE !!!

  • Why does obama want to restart the Nazi ss again? Didn't we beat their asses back in WW2 down to the ground? I got better things to do than listen to this guy sputter stupid communist ideas...like leave a floating obama in the toliet and flushing it down.

  • if you want this nightmare to stop 2010 and 2012 will show your determination to get him out of office and to change the congress .thats the only way to get out of this mess hes created

  • Got news for you people that think he's talking about a Militia - They are Well Armed and funded by Hard working American Patriots...He's obviously talking about his Sheep Army. 3rd richt? is that what you are talking about "The Gestapo, green Police?" Kale

  • There's no need to speculate on what he was talking about by listening to a 37 second clip from a 30 minute speech.

    If you watch the whole speech, before making this statement he clearly stated that he was talking about the U.S. Foreign Service (of diplomats), and increasing America's national security by increasing DIPLOMATIC efforts in the world, rather than using military force alone.

  • umm let me tell what he means - A National Civilan Security Force ( Martial Law ! ) a Force of people well armed and funded to obey like Military but probably used to secure Department of Defense or National Security Objective "New World Order" probably use this army for gun control - from house to house.

  • Isnt that the constitutional definition of a "militia"? ...or is that something else that needs to be re-defined as well.

  • or maybe im just looking to far into that.

  • Exactly, we should throw his own words back in his face and demand state militias be formed immediately! :)

  • well you're technically right. BUT the real militia are set up by everyday average citizens like you and me and the government has nothing to do with them. the militia is not government funded, what hes talking about is along the lines of the brownshirts, or the ss. atleast in theory it would loosely be set up the same way, but probably and hopefully never have the intentions of the ss. but the fact that he said it is bad enough for me, thats enough to get my panties in a bunch lol

  • Your an idiot, it is about obama wanting a national force, as well as spending MORE money we don't have, what a shame it would be if the goverment had to balance its budget just like an american household - and how nice it would be if americans could vote for there own pay increase. Anyone who doesn't see that hitler and obama came to power in more or less the same fashion - with more or less the same goals deserves whats coming. First it was jews - this time its everyone.

  • Maybe he intends to use this national force to round up the millions of people here illegally. Im doubt he would use them to monitor the public at large. Obama loves us and just wants us to be safe. Thtat's why he won't talk about terrorism. If we close our eye real tight our problems will just go away.