The Great Deceptions - Veronica Chapman pt. 1

[bmthfreestyler]

I said if requested forms arent sent then I presume the matter closed...... Anyone help or comments gratefully recieved

[bmthfreestyler]

My mate said as im not a registered company or notary that they dont have to respond within that time & that they dont have to send anything  also that the loan company will keep sending statements off accounts with threats off court & will take me to court..

Hes wrong isnt he..... Can ya help men in this matter..... As I need to sort this things before continuing on my quest for a free life....

[bmthfreestyler]

Bangonitdave,, ive been intrigued on this whole movement & have been studying pages , videos folowing yrself d.ike the antiterrorist to name a couple as well.asyrself.

Talk about food for thought. Looking to action some off the info & came across the get out off debt page.Ive copied the letter as instructed to a loan company it was ignored & another cmpny related to them are asking now. This time I sent it to their legal department,,,, giving them 21 days to reply

[TheMickstanley]

Im Mick Stanley girlfriend, hes just showed me a little of the freeman community which i find interesting x

[optionsupdate]

who was the chap speaking about commercial liens

[salford08]

I have found this video after stumbling across your website, i read the section 165 scam article and your right, something did smell fishy to me, but it wasn't a scam, the thing i found to be fishy was that your friend wasn't telling you the whole truth and your understanding of the word revoked was a little of key in this context. There are a number of reasons a license can be revoked such as on medical grounds etc, which is deemed by LAW equal to a short term or even indeffinate ban.

[salford08]

@salford08 Basically the revocation of a license is a ban until your either banned or given back your legal driving status.

[valvia]

why do you sound so much like a man?

[michaelleyland]

@valvia does it matter?

[valvia]

@michaelleyland yes, some people believe that "Veronica Chapman" isnt actually who 'she' says she is. Its a conspiracy theory...

[ARJI1979]

@valvia cos it is a guy she's free to be what ever he/she wants to be!

[salford08]

@ARJI1979 seriously was a little confused then for a minute, thanks for clearing that up. =)

[51zarathustra]

I really like your presentation, I even bought your book. I also joined the FTOML Forum, on your recomendation. Unfortunatly, there is an over zealous moderator on there called treeman. I posted two blogs, and he banned me from the forum.

If you would like my side of the story, then please e-mail me at zarathustra50@hotmail.com Tommy.

[ahamatmabrahman]

This just may be of interest to youThe amoeba is the lowest form of lfe according to modren science According to Vedic science , the lowest form of life is a stone ie Because some hills and mountains grow they must be considered to have a soul , anyway thank you Veronica, a lovely lecture, Im enjoying it immensely

[icanfixyourpc]

Great Stuff! Everyone spread the word...set the people free.

[slugfoot1]

Ok, I watched the lot.

In all, I felt that they were very informative and well presented. The sound is good too, which always helps.

She needs to stay away from (or learn more about) biology though, since making errors about stuff like that will damage credibility. - Especially in the first 5 minutes or so.

A good series of vids.

[slugfoot1]

Oh dear.

I came here for information and had to stop after 5 minutes. - Bacteria is NOT sentient, homeopathy has NO beneficial effects beyond, perhaps, the placebo effect and an organism without the ability to procreate would not be able to evolve in the first place.

I'll watch the rest of the video but I seriously doubt the efficacy in doing so.

[VeggiePower303]

@slugfoot1 Oh dear. How do you know that bacteria is not sentient?

Has it accrued to you that maybe you are not sentient enough to recognize that bacteria is sentient, but of a different order?

Obviously not.

[slugfoot1]

@VeggiePower303

Wikipedia - "Sentience is the ability to feel, perceive or be conscious, or to have subjective experiences."

No brain = no ability to feel, perceive be conscious or to have subjective experiences.

How can something incapable of thought process experience any of the above? - Perhaps you could cite some evidence to the contrary?

I'm not knocking this series of videos (which I found informative), I just feel that the first one got off to a bad start with those daft inaccuracies.

[VeggiePower303]

@slugfoot1 Again, how on Earth do you know that; Bacteria doesn't have "the ability to feel, perceive or be conscious, or to have subjective experiences."

All life is sentient all though different types.

All life is capable of all of the things mentioned above.

If you can't re-COGNIZE that than you are not very conscious and that is not my fault.

If YOU can't recognize sentient no amount of evidence is going to convince you.

One evidence could be that they have the ability to stay alive.

[DaOrginalUnderground]

@slugfoot1

Wiki subject experience, magnets experience their forces on each other

[slugfoot1]

@DaOrginalUnderground - I found no such entry in Wikipedia. I suspect you are talking complete bollocks.

Provide a link.

[ARJI1979]

@slugfoot1 wikipedia hahaha

[AlanWattParrot]

@slugfoot1 homeopathy works on principles - wilfully - not understood by western medicine. I noticed your other materialist fallacy too that consciousness is exclusively brain centred, it isn't.

[slugfoot1]

@AlanWattParrot - Homepopathy IS (so-called) western medicine. It was invented (for want of a better word) by a German called Samuel Hahnemann. While you're pondering this perhaps you could explain to us how a particle of substance the size of a grain of rice diluted in a volume of water the size of the solar system can have any benefit whatsoever besides, perhaps, a placebo effect.

When you've explained that perhaps you could shed some light on how consciousness is possible without a brain.

[AlanWattParrot]

@slugfoot1 you're getting into a pedantic linguistic dispute over definitions? Self-defeating for you to do so however and here's why: when ppl ref. 'western medicine' they mean conventional medicine (conventional in the west) that uses pharma active agents and /or physical intervention to treat diseases, 'conditions', bodily trauma. The term 'allopathic medicine' which is what homeopaths call it, was rejected by the mainstream which prefers the definition "western medicine" .... continued ...

[AlanWattParrot]

(2) as opposed to, or distinct from, homeopathy. Mkay?

I'm not your private researcher either! I notified you that homeopathy works on principles not understood and therefore arrogantly dismissed by western medicine. It's entirely up to you to investigate these, the psycho-physical dynamics which make it efficacious,by ref. to any number of credible online sources (which, btw, does not incl wikipedia that invariably errs on the side of the Approved Lie). It's an established practice .. cont

[AlanWattParrot]

@slugfoot1 (3) b/c it works consistently well - if it were mere quackery it wouldn't (but, as you, ironically enough (!), acknowledge, even quackery can work via the placebo effect ... care to explain that and its implications for our remit here?

As for consciousness not being exclusively brain based, yes, there are even philosophers of mind who reject the prevailing orthodoxy of unitary consciousness, Alva Noe springs immediately to mind. But while i accept the methodology of academia .. cont

[AlanWattParrot]

@slugfoot1 (4) (being scientifically trained myself) as useful to an extent, when iexclusively applied it's risibly insufficient to account for the human condition. I unabashedly maintain that we are spirit beings incarnate, our bodies enabling us to navigate in this dimension. Science means knowledge, not hard-nosed materialism (something i reject on the basis of scientific principles actually: to observe, analyse and conclude. Materialists seem to have difficulty therewith lol

[SteevDragon67]

Don't let these jerks distract you, or discourage you, Veronica. Anyone with a new, or radical idea is ridiculed at first.

[m1pete]

Is this a man or a woman, it's hard to tell.

[PeterMWeller]

@tent600 It's bad form to attack the messenger, it would be better to listen to the message.

[bangonitdave]

such a good talk PLEASE may i ask if i could re-upload this to my channel with credit back to you thanks

[truthjuicefilms]

@bangonitdave please go ahead, thanks for asking - would prefer if you could upload @ full quality 720p HD