Added: 4 years ago
From: ZeroScam
Views: 42,139
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (99)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @SteelBeWithYou NASA has PLENTY of drive and ambition. What NASA does not have is funding from our inept government.

  • Comment removed

  • What this video really doesn't show is how small these capsules really were.

    You could just get two guys inside, and that was about it.

    They must have gone through some incredible testing to find guys who could just stayed in such a confined space without going nuts.

  • *HONK! BEEP!* "Get out of my way -- I was in this orbit first!!"

  • 13 Days in that capsule....That takes a lot. Try sitting in a chair for three hours.

  • @matrix49A

    Sitting for that long would be unbearable on earth but zero G probably helps a lot

  • @SteelBeWithYou yeah... now its about money and politics instead of discovery and exploration.... but NASA's still working on new missions

  • take that you Ruskeys.....

  • why faking it? In 1960's and 70's was harder to fake than to accomplish.

  • To those who think the moon landings were fake. Why would you think we'd be good at conspiracy when we can't do anything else very well? It's illogical. We went to the moon -- get over it. Besides you can go to many of the famous observatories and they regularly allow the public to view the landing sites through the telescopes.

  • The only thing that gets me is that the re-entry heat shield looks nothing more than corrugated like you see on a metal shed. Not saying its fake but the re-entry shield of gemini looks a little flimsy

  • @KINGASH1ST I believe the white portion was ejected before reentry...

  • @irish89055 Correct. The white portion contains the retro thrusters and are jettisoned prior to re-entry interface. The heat shield is the bottom portion of the black capsule. The lack of understanding from the general public of these kinds of things is exactly what leads to conspiracy theories.

  • This was very important mission - two manned spaceships working together for the first time.

  • There were ideas for lunar missions with Gemini, lunar landings and lunar orbit missions. Different boosters were suggested.

    Gemini may have been the point at which the US overtook the USSR. It could change its orbit in terms of longitude and latitude at a time when Soviet spacecraft could only change altitude.

  • im a 39 yr old man from australia & I take my hat off to the USA for having the GUTS & Determination to enter the space race & make it to the MOON. I regard myself incredibley lucky to have lived in this time to have have seen it done.

  • @xcxaandy13 thanks mate... We could always count on Australia to stand with us...

  • @irish89055 no worries, happy to stick up for you guys where i see fit.

    cheers

  • @xcxaandy13 And we apologize for Skylab.

  • @ZenPapageno

    Gemini also set records for long duration spaceflight (indeed, one of the two crews depicted in this video was midway through a 14-day mission) and achieved the first (true) orbital rendezvous and the first orbital docking.

    Also, they were flying a lot more missions than the Soviets--ten in two years, basically.

    And even though the Soviets spacewalked first, the Gemini astronauts did it more and took better pictures.

    Conclusion: US definitely in the lead by 1965.

  • they look like little toys :)

  • Youtube provides a podium for people who should not be heard under any circumstances...

    humanmonkey you are one of them. What makes you think that you cannot guide a space vehicle to a lunar landing with a computer with 64 of memory? The functions required come from issac newton. They just require simple iteration and basic mathematics. You only need 4GB of memory when you are wasting it on graphics, downloading pron, games and music. 64K is tons if its used correctly.

  • yea i guess that proves my old 8088 was useless back in the 80's. man you just can do anything with 64 memory.

    yes there are a lot of idiots on the net. the best thing to do is point out the fact they are idiots.

    debating them makings it seem like they have some legitimacy to their mouth shit.

    we live in a time were stupidity, crazy and ignorance are acceptable traits.

  • "Idiocy and the Stupid People Who Practice it as a Lifestyle"

    Starring:

    humanmonkeys2

  • Yes. The LM computer or AGC was a simple computer. Which is probably WHY it had such a good track record of NOT failing, unlike our computers today which are constantly crashing and freezing up.

  • Allow me to bestow upon you some common high school knowledge.

    Ship's guidance and control was controlled by the onboard computer called the AGC. The crew's bio readings, ship's environmental data and telemetry calculations were done by IBM mainframe model 75 computers in Mission Control and the Manned Spacecraft Center in Houston.

  • Yeah, you know, mission control, where all the (GASP!) computers were during the mission.

    ....and I am the moron... HAH!

  • Lunar module did not require much in the way of computers. Most of the calculations were done in mission control. DUH!

    You are correct. I have never been to the moon. How ingenuous of you to point that out.

  • Humanmonkeys = hoaxtard bot.

    Spamming comment sections with blithering idiocy.

    Lunar Module was no toy. It was rather expensive. It's OK. When we go back, we will recover at least one of the landing modules and it will be in the Smithsonian Institute next to the Mercury craft. There won't even be a footnote that says some people believed we never went to the moon.

  • 2 years?

    No I have been bashing you little twerps around since 2001.

  • Why? Just because I won't play along with your retarded light source and shadow routine?

    THIS SHIT IS OLD! I have discussed THIS photo ad nauseum. This is ALL the crap you guys EVER come up with. THen when someone with common sense SHOWS you how you are wrong, all you can do is call them a shill and try to sell the SAME thing to someone else!

    You guys are truly pathetic. Follow Bart Sibrel into obscurity if you want. I will keep looking forward.

  • LOL!

    I wasn't the one crying about it!

    pitiful was.

    LOL!

  • so pt1gard, do you believe all the russian space films are fake as well? or are they ALL owned by the same secret org out to rule the world?

  • yes INF russia faked a lot of their stuff, check out Yuri's backstory, its hilarious

  • same way the people in the gemini did?

  • umm it seems the camera is inside the other gemini craft looking at the other? why do you doubt this is a real film? what would be the point of making a fake?

  • He doubts it is real because he is a lunatic. Welcome to the world of the Moon Hoax conspiracy theorist. A misfit band of pathetic individuals who USED to stay in the confines of their basements but have since found a place on the internet to congregate without better men beating the and taking their lunch money. Have fun being called names because you believe we actually went to the moon.

  • yeah thats right, deke, you got us all profile,d, gi joe rocks lmao

  • So far you have been fitting my typical CT profile quite well, champ. Keep up the fail work.

  • you are as predictable a shill as a pig at buffet table... anyhow, any thoughts how the film survived the heat and radiation, lmoa

  • Good. Another shill acusation punctuated with your crazy laughter at the end.

    The film survived because it was adequately protected. Which is why we have HUNDREDS of pictures recording the event, NONE of which have been considered fake by REAL experts.

  • really shilly, can you list the hundred of non nasa connected sources, lmao

  • USA Today The New York Times Los Angeles Times Chicago Tribune The Washington Post New York Daily News New York Post The Denver Post The Dallas Morning News The Philadelphia Inquirer Houston Chronicle The Detroit News / Detroit Free Press Star Tribune The Star-Ledger
  • lmfao, ru serious, shilly, those are all msm zionist owned, nice try, we know operation paperclip brought the nazis to nasa and faked wvB's trip to caps for your faked petrified wood to denmark

  • Hah! You didn't even need to reply. I KNEW you were going to say they were ALL in on it. You are really hopeless.

    This is WHY no one can take you folks seriously. You are all incredible idiots.

    Op Paperclip ONCE again does NOT even IMPLY the Apollo Mission was faked. To say so is a logical fallacy. Oh, but don't stop on MY account. Please entertain us sane people some more!

  • mr gullible, you are one who believes in cloud deities and the official stories of 9/11 and holocaust and swine flu ... must be nice to live in shill land and know the gov never makes a mistake ... who owns 57% of the Fed, genius? gawd, you are ignorant ... you amuse me, tho ... adults that play with gi joes are arrested in childhood and never question anything have that propensity LMFAO

  • Oh, MY, pitiful.

    WHEN did we ever even talk about holocaust or swine flu? You are a freakin' NUT!

    Gov't never makes mistakes??? HAH! Our gov't is MADE of mistakes!

    You amuse me, too, although not as much as some of the more exciteable, rabid CT's out there. Adults that defame the accomplishments of others because they have no accomlishments of thier own are arrested in adulthood.

    roflcopter

  • hey, doofus, lemme ask ya, you think 9'11 was done by boxcutters that got norad to stand down and that investigating dishonors the ones the mossad and the cia murdered right, lmao ...

    here's a good link for you, guy's uncle died in 9/11 and he thinks the official story is BS and got 80K sigs on petition to reopen the whitewash hoax .... you wont comment and will do an ad hominem bc you are a shill, but anyway, just have to roast ya again lmao

    thepeople speak radio . net/ 2009/ 09/

  • For the love of PETE!

    Once AGAIN, 9/11 has NOTHING to do with Apollo! Can you stay focused, or does the ADD really hit you that hard???

    Ad hom attack is just deserts for those who can't stay on TOPIC.

    If you are so antsy to discuss 9/11, go to a freakin' 9/11 video!

    Damn, what a nitwit!

  • you dont discuss apollo, in fact you dont discuss anything, you must not like putting down your GI joes, all you do is use trite profiling ...

    now lets get back to moon, wuss :)

    why isnt there any tire tracks under as-17-140-21354??

    univac, whats wrong with this pic? LMAO

    nasm . si . edu / collections / imagery / apollo / AS12 / images / AS12 - 49 -7278 . html

  • THERE! Back on topic at last!

    No tire tracks... Let's see.

    Well in THIS picture it seems the rover came to a stop here. What do you think? They covered the tracks for some reason?

    The rover tracks are pretty shallow and be be hard to see from this angle.

    Are you telling me that it was easier to stage this photo by CARRYING the rover to this spot when they could have DRIVEN it? They FORGOT to put tire tracks in somehow? YIKES!

  • no, lemming, they got down on their knees and detailed them away, dont ya think lmao

  • Yeah, they staged the most elaborate hoax in history and just forgot to add in obvious details. Makes sense... to a loon.

    There is nothing 'wrong' with the photo AS12-49-7278.

  • nothing wrong with the pic???!!! maybe you need ot send it out to your zionist rags for further inspection, lmfao!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Nope. This pic is ANCIENT history. It's one of the first you hoaxtards attacked. I guess you could call it hoaxtard history.

    The funniest thing about you guys is you pull these things out as if YOU personally discovered them when it was some OTHER social misfit that did so over 15 YEARS ago. Just as it was some other guy with common sense that set the record straight that long ago as well. Thank you for rehashing OLD ass arguments. You guys ROCK!

  • Do you even realize that you are rehashing an argument I had TWO freakin' years ago with another one of you guys??? This tire track thing is silly. The only explanation I got last time was this was purposely done by a whistle blower in the group. PLEASE. A hoax this big and NO checks and balances to make sure it is correct??? THe SIMPLE answer is that the tracks DO exist and they are obscured by the camer angle.

  • The Boston Globe

    The Arizona Republic

    The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

    Newsday

    USA Today

    National Geographic

    American Heritage

    Newsweek

    Time

    U.S. News & World Report

  • Just to name a few. But then I suppose ALL of these newspapers and magazines published pictures of the Apollo mission either KNOWING they were fake OR not as intelligent as YOU to figure out they were fake, right?

    Yeah. Laughing MY ass off, now.

  • Comment removed

  • @boomshanka Come on, boomer. Why did you remove your comment? It was ever so witty and insightful and gave such strong credence to your intellectual capacity.

  • @Deke101 It's just that I suddenly caught on to the fact that you were just being sarcastic.

  • isn't the "hair" on the image part of a viusal aid on the window for flight?

  • wheres the cam then inifnity?

  • you tube . com/ watch?v =IWr0UO0vuWY &feature= player_embedde d#t=33

  • Not only should humanmonkeys2 be terminated, but then we should send his body to deep space on a NASA Delta II rocket, just for the hell of it.

  • You should be terminated, humanmonkeys2. Cunt.

    Anyway, this shows you the progress of space travel. They didn't just go to the moon in one shot, they had to perfect a number of procedures. The early missions proved something was possible, which was used for the next mission, and that mission proved something for the next mission.

  • 4kb IS a lot back in the 60s......

  • love the hairs on the camera, perfect evidence done in a studio, lmao, what fish you nasa druts are

  • The HAIRS on the CAMERA!!!

    OMFG!!! It ALL makes sense now!

    THe WHOLE thing comes crashing down! Hairs. ON the camera! It is so obviously faked! I mean, hairs could not POSSIBLY exist on the camera if it was in outer space. Hairs = studio. PERFECT logic.

    wow. I mean, just, wow.

  • knew you wouldnt and couldnt answer it, they cant appear in space, mutant

  • Oh, PLEASE enlighten us as to WHY they can't appear in space, when obviously, they DO.

  • cant appear just like your cloud deity, haha .... do the hairs just ride on the cam lens thousands of miles in space and not get dislodged in the earth's atmosphere lmfao

  • Yeah, because ALL of that WIND in space, right?

    Alrighty, then!

  • I know this might be a shock to you, but those things in the camera lens may not be hairs.

  • youtu  be. com/ watch?v =7ZO6JPsszrY& feature=email

  • Fake moon rock OLD news. Easily debunked.

  • thats right then then lying nauts gave them a piece of wood, even your shill admits its BS

  • LOL!

    Your logic is priceless!!!

  • I liked the Gemini capsule and command modual

    so much better I feel like they should have used it for the Moon missions I really respected all the 60`s designers of aeronautics electronics everything was made so good then and it worked nothing was ever let go to the public untried the materials used were also much better .. Gemini would have been a great cm for the moon missions ...

  • They thought about it but wisely decided against it. The capsule was terribly cramped, very unsafe for EVA, and lacked may design features for a lunar trip.

    I agree about 60's engineering though, the standards were higher then.

  • The Gemini spacecraft looks like a gas mask.

  • フランク・ボーマンジェームズ・ラベル氏がジェミニ7号に乗って­いたのでしたね。この二人はアポロ8号でもクルーとして一緒でし­た。彼らは今でも元気ですかね。先日はアポロ11号のオルドリン­氏が来日していましたね。

  • i see one of the astronauts cleaning the window

  • Well, that is not what he says... He just makes a note that you cant believe everything you see on TV... It is on page 156 (hardback edition). If you read the whole text concerning the moonlandings you may also notice that he never uses the phrase 'Apollo Simulation Project'...

  • the gemini series was just the best in regards to space travel...those guys had nerves of titanium !! the risk ,the first,the missions,all were dangerous,and like someone said,this is when we passed the ruskies...i have such respect for the early nasa programs...thanks for posting this...its really appreciated by me....

  • Great footage...where did you get it? This was one of NASA's greatest achievements prior to circling the moon (Apollo 8) and landing on the moon (Apollo 11). The Gemini 7/6a missions set a number of records, and marks the exact point that the United States overtook and passed the Soviet Union in the space race. Thanks.

  • Very high quality footage for the time also amazing they did this mission in 1965.

    One of the guys on Gemini 7 described the experience as being locked inside a VW bug for 13 days riding in the Shuttle or even it's successor Orion is cushy by comparison.

  • great looking crafts!

  • Simply wonderful ! Historical !

  • first ever space rendezvouz, at like 10-15 you can see the guy in the other capsule waving madly.

  • Like 2 guys in a phone booth to live in.

  • Impressive footage!

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more