thank you for what you have done. Its harder work then people just type and say stupid things. I feel sorry for them they are just shallow poeple. No matter you are right or not, I think you alot for what you have achieved and made for us.
Humans cannot be treated as cylinders, though, because unlike cylinders humans cannot lock themselves into a stance. This method of determining stability works only on objects with a static composure; humans do not have static composures. Thus, this method cannot correctly demonstrate human stability.
I don't know where you get the idea of the Bagua and Taichi stances are like those you are saying. I'm student of praying mantis, and my teacher taught Taichi too; and I've seen Bagua practitioners; I've never seen anybody doing the forms with those stances.
Pls be careful with what you post or what results from your research because without properly confirmation from masters, it is damaging to the body as well as create confusion on martial arts. The correct theory of all chinese martial arts are results of hundreds or years of physical training and not just by a computer model.
As for the horse stance, don't quote me, just look at the shoalin monks for reference, do you see them sticking their butt out. Try doing that long enough, your lower back will ache and your chi will not follow through your meridians well. Taichi states that movements should be nature and not of stressing the joints. Look at the 4 great taichi masters of china, do you ever see them having their knees over their toes or sticking their asses out. As for bagua, I need say no more.
I think this video is based just scienticfic knowledge. When you apply that on bones and blood ie a human being, it will not work. All taichi teachers stress that the knee caps must never exceed the toes, which will result in stress and damage to the knees. The hips must also not roll in unnaturally too much. The taichi texts states from the head to the tail bone it should be in one straight line and not curved in at the hips.
thank you for what you have done. Its harder work then people just type and say stupid things. I feel sorry for them they are just shallow poeple. No matter you are right or not, I think you alot for what you have achieved and made for us.
dorikings 7 months ago
@dorikings ONE SMART MAN ! I also appreciate this work.
ZlatiGochev 1 week ago in playlist Uploaded videos
This looks like a stance that Big Bird would do :). Stop smoking the reefer, dude.
airjordan4ever 1 year ago
You are an idiot. These ideas have no relationship with Ba Gua whatsoever. Even the Tai Chi posture is wrong. This is all crap.
banjobilly 1 year ago
Humans cannot be treated as cylinders, though, because unlike cylinders humans cannot lock themselves into a stance. This method of determining stability works only on objects with a static composure; humans do not have static composures. Thus, this method cannot correctly demonstrate human stability.
zharnotczar 2 years ago
No mater how you look at the human body, the stance in picture from 0:10 - 0:15 is unstable and not even similar to the one fom 8:13 - 8:16.
Zvezdav 2 years ago
I don't know where you get the idea of the Bagua and Taichi stances are like those you are saying. I'm student of praying mantis, and my teacher taught Taichi too; and I've seen Bagua practitioners; I've never seen anybody doing the forms with those stances.
J0hn4lexB0r 3 years ago
WTF? 2:52 Who does taiji like that?? Don't try to make excuses for bad stances with 'science'. This vid is hilarious. I hope it is meant to be.
amfalk 3 years ago 2
Wouldn't that cylinder from your other vid, fit into that part of the body regardless of what posture you were in? It's somewhat ambiguous.
burettosan 3 years ago
Don't you have any concept of mingmen? Why, that's one of the most important principles in the chinese martial arts. :(
TheOtherChris 3 years ago
Twisted logic on twisted bodies make no convincing arguments. Stop the internal arts fantasies.
FitnessSLC 3 years ago
Pls be careful with what you post or what results from your research because without properly confirmation from masters, it is damaging to the body as well as create confusion on martial arts. The correct theory of all chinese martial arts are results of hundreds or years of physical training and not just by a computer model.
bigfatfoot 3 years ago
As for the horse stance, don't quote me, just look at the shoalin monks for reference, do you see them sticking their butt out. Try doing that long enough, your lower back will ache and your chi will not follow through your meridians well. Taichi states that movements should be nature and not of stressing the joints. Look at the 4 great taichi masters of china, do you ever see them having their knees over their toes or sticking their asses out. As for bagua, I need say no more.
bigfatfoot 3 years ago
I think this video is based just scienticfic knowledge. When you apply that on bones and blood ie a human being, it will not work. All taichi teachers stress that the knee caps must never exceed the toes, which will result in stress and damage to the knees. The hips must also not roll in unnaturally too much. The taichi texts states from the head to the tail bone it should be in one straight line and not curved in at the hips.
bigfatfoot 3 years ago