Added: 5 years ago
From: Garten260
Views: 100,464
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (152)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • who made the plane crash

  • The north tower collapse was bullshit. Only 20% of the building was above imapct. That 20% took down 80% at a constant speed. I would have thought by the time the collapse hit the 50 floor it would have grinded to a halt and debris should hav spewed outward and left at the VERY least 30 floors. Unsuprising if you look at collapse footage debris does spew outwards so what the fuk took a perfectly solid integrity legit 80% of the building down?! And why was the concrete puverised in mid air to su

  • when the plane hit the buildings fire spred down the elivator shaft hiting the 22nd and 13th and the lobby

  • did those building have over 12000 gallons of jet fuel in them at the time of the fire

  • when a car goes behind a plane it gets fliped but not when the plane is moving over 600 miles per hour

  • google WTC building 7

  • you are really stupid sometimes the plane itself could have took out support beams weakening the tower and the second tower hit fell first because there was more weight above the impact sight so go fuck off if you think this is a conspiracy and just have respect for the lives that were lost that day you unpatriot stupid son of a bitch

  • The building collapsed because jet fuel burns at a lot higher of a temperature than just any old fire and yeah an aluminum jet can slice through steel especially when it's flying at 500miles an hour at least! Great video it gives a lot of information on opposing views of 9/11

  • okk its good but there was a 3000 pound plane on the burning bulting

  • When the guy says that the other buildings burnt for over 17 hours and didn't fall. . . Thats because to fucking plane hit it!

  • if you can see anything in those 5 different frames, then maybe it was a bomb. be cause the blast goes straight up and out. similar to what a bomb explosion would look like.

  • they wouldn't be blown away off the road. watch videos of the St Maarteen airport. they are about 50 ft above people's head when landing. don't get blown away. not saying this isn't true. just saying

  • The gov hired chuck norris that day to kick down WTC 1,2 and 7!

  • cars survived undamaged in the underground car park so it is possable the passports could have survived

  • Think! Use your thinking. Stop letting the government think for you. There were passports from the terrorist that survived the explosions. If the fire brought a building down how in the world could passports make it to the ground without a scratch. You are in denial because you have been conditioned to believe that Big Brother is taking care of you. You have given up your power and you have let Big Brother do your thinking for you. Centralized power since the beginning must control the masses.

  • I really like @ 1:40 where it mentions the airplane blowing things in back of it!! I was happy that it was mentioned! That is something I always mentioned to people about that, why it is impossible for a plane to have done that! Also tey claim the airplane was at top speed 530MPH, now that would have blown everything to the next town!!

  • america is just a blood thirsty money grabbing elite who are trying to get their hands on the oil dominated countries, all this stuff is composed by the american gov, so they can blame other countries for so called terriost attacks and then send in the troops and take over, i mean american trained and supply these countries with weapons

  • my uncle was a firefighter that day and he told me with his years of education in arson and he said that a plane that size with tons of jet fuel would not be able bring down a building that size with out any help from explosives. the building was too well built to be brought down by just a plane. RIP all those who have lost their live on 9/11.

  • @DeV1lDoG77 was the jet fuel hot enuff to even kinda melt the metal alil

  • 04:11 look at the left side of a tower i see the exploition

  • So is still al qaida behind 9/11 ??? Or the U.S goverment!

  • Comment removed

  • At some point citizens are going to realize that they are viewed as nothing more that pons on a chess board by the elite that make the big decisions. I often wonder what will it take. Clearly a mass murder on 9-11 didn't do anything to evoke a revolutionary response other than murdering innocent women and children in Iraq. We sheep will continue to graze in ignorance.

  • Of course there were explosions, what else do you expect when a freakin' airplane hits a building? A nice gentle fire?

  • @danielteeboom how can there be three explosions with a dual engine airplane?

  • Dont forget the several thousand tons of steel which had been hurled at high velocity against those buildings. It wasn't just jet fuel.

  • dude just stfu planes hit for sure, weather hijacked by terrorists or a conspiracy we dont know all we know they're down and damn sad so shut up about ur conspiracy's ok?????

  • NCOproductions I 100% agree with you. Government lied to all Americans this is clearly an inside job. Fuck the government

  • When the guy said that the other buildings did not collapse, the twin towers did have big jetliners crash into them and explode. But WTC 7, that is a little strange....

  • Ok if it wasn't a plane thta hit the Pentagon tell me what happen to the missing plane that they claimed hit the pentagon?

  • this guy talking is stupid! he tells you if you drop something from the top of the building it will fall to the ground at the exact same time! NO IT WOULDNT.... THE BALL WOULD HIT 1.5 SECONDS FASTER

  • @epilepsyi2011 you are correct, as i physics researcher myself, your statement was quite accurate.

  • i dont understand. So the government paid someone to give their life and fly a plane into a building?? because its obviously a fact that the buildings were hit by planes. Someone please reiterate....

  • Planes. And why not get the white house , instead the shoot down flight 93 and even there familys say they were saying they were going to fight back, and never mind flight 93 all of them had made a phone calls from the planes that youre telling me were disposed and used for the cover up. huge cover up don/t u think

  • Oh shut it! other people said they saw the flight 77 before impact and if flight 11 and 175 didn,t hit the twin towes were did they go? so youre telling me that the goverment aged to get rid of 4 planes in mid air and manage to find 19 people to blame it on, ok at least 8 of them have been said to be alive but that could mean they were stealing identites , but anyway if he managed to get controled cargo planes to hit the twin towers why a missile to hit the pentagon, why not just use cargo

  • Also, physics and mathematical equations say that the towers would've taken at least 96 seconds to collapse fully without the help of outside forces (Explosives)

    There is no way that the planes caused the collapse. Jet fuel doesn't have to be hot enough to melt steal, only weaken it, but I highly doubt that it would take an hour to cause the collapse.. Besides that, you can even HEAR the explosions. And, not only that, but check out the steel columns in the rubble.

  • @NCOProductions Well, the first tower came down, because it was hit by an airplane lower than the other tower, the heat caused the steel to become weaker, but the main cause of the collapse was that the burning steel could not support the upper stories. There were no explosions, you weren't inside the tower when they collapsed so shut up.

  • @Guzluvtaco8 I wasn't in the towers, but I was within 10 blocks when the first tower collapsed, I ran inside some clothing store. Now, I know exactly what I heard, and the fact that multiple other steel structures around the world have had burned for over 24 hours and still stood... What's that all about then? Huh? Because I'm pretty sure the World Trade Center would've stood if there were no explosions. Open your eyes kid, the government is lying. They're all corrupt asswipes.

  • Dumbasses, he was refering at building 7, which wasn`t hit by an airplane, and still collapsed...due to so called fire setting debrees... Dumbasses, you`re more stupid than my grandma` believing that Jesus existed....at least she`s 100 Yrs old...You deserve your miserable existance, that`s why they can sell this bullshit, because they got clients for it!!!

  • you got me on the pentagon, i highly doubt that it was a commercial flight, but with the twin towers and flight 93 i think was an actual attack. i believe bush set the pentagon attack up. and plus on everyother plane there were phone calls from the flight attendents

  • @snooglewoogle1 why would bush set up a pentagon attack that just happened to be on the same day and time frame as a real terrorist attack that he didn't know about you are retarded you are the reason this is a "conspierecy" and not just what really happened

  • Next you speak of these planes as not being actuall airplanes but military jets. Ok well where are all the ppl that died on them and why the hell are you trying to prove a conspiracy anyways. You want a conspiracy go to area 51 and try to get into the military installations there. When they arrest you then tell me the government is covering up stuff. Go investigate the Kenndy killing and tell me what you find out. You are full of shit

  • This is the biggest bunch of Horseshit I have ever heard. You speak of all those buildings that were on fire and did not collapse. Were any of them hit by airplanse? NO! So you cannot compare those incidents to the WTC. Next you talk about missiles hitting the towers first and that is horseshit too. Sunlight reflecting off the airplanes explains that.

  • Buddy, you are incredible.... i ailways know that this cant be real, are you ok right now? the normal people dont want to see the true, like in atocha, madrid... how can the goverment stay telling us an chield history? always the same, i appreciate this information, i visited the twin towers in 2000, i love it..

  • I remember an architect from a documentary (I can't remember the title, but it was shown few years ago) about the towers that the structure was tested if it can withstand a crash like this one.. he said yes. Any skyscraper with that size should have withstand that kind of impact because while planning they always devised scenarios that will befall the building. and yes they did a scenario about planes.. at this case they might not have included a boeing crashing to it....

  • you guys are such idiots, and mean idiots!!!!

  • I am nearly 66 years old. Having been a rather precocious child, who liked reading the newspaper, and watching television, I learned, early onn, that what the government says, on ANY subject, must be taken with a BOX of salt! This horrific event...with its death-toll, that I am certain, far exceeds that given in the media...did not happen as we have been told! There will come "a day of reckoning", for those responsible...and, I have my doubts that Bin Laden is one of them...

  • It wasn't AL-qaeda. Search "al qaeda fake", "al qaeda cia". Check the crazy stuff I filmed recently near me (chemtrails)... NWO is real, learn and wake others ASAP.

  • This is indisputable evidence that our Government is corrupt. but sadly i believe that most Americans are ignorant to the fact of this, or just don't care at all.

  • Joe Schmoe knows its an inside job... Wake Up America!!!

  • Blackbird and other extremely naive and ignorant americans STILL don't see the light. Our gvmt is the enemy of the world. We need a NWO NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • I hope someone pushes you down a flight of fucking stairs. How can anyone say it was our government? Why would our government do such a thing

  • "so how come those other buildings were burning for so many hours but didnt come tumbling down..."

    They didn't get hit by an airplane which sliced through the building and injected tons of fuel in them. If you leave out such important facts how can you make sense of anything?

    Again: The towers withstood the impact of the airplanes. It is the combination of impact, fuel and fire which they did not withstand.

  • @danielteeboom - the Pentagon building wasn't a skyscraper!! Dawh!!

  • @danielteeboom how can you watch all this stuff and see all the evidence and still say it wasn't planned it is as obvious as you can get

  • @danielteeboom the twin towers had a redundant design and the metal was unprotected and its was sheet rock and the jet fuel softened the metal making it weak enough to melt and implode on it self

  • @danielteeboom you are one big dummy...

  • @danielteeboom Wow thank you!

  • @danielteeboom Ok, with that logic, explain the collapse of WTC 7. (Hint: You can't)

  • @danielteeboom "They didn't get hit by an airplane which sliced through the building and injected tons of fuel in them."

    Yeah, neither did Building 7! "If you leave out such important facts how can you make sense of anything?"

  • @danielteeboom so according to u aluminum plane cut thru steel? do u have a mental problem?

  • so how come those other buildings were burning for so many hours but didnt come tumbleing down like the towers, which only took less than half n hour 4 that 2 happin?

    your thoery dosent really stand, i dont think.

  • hello corruption

  • AMEN!

  • I can think and reason for myself, and look for answers to confirm if my suspicions agree with reality.

    For each of your experts there are countless other experts. So there is no point in relying on them.

  • I guess I should ignore the engineers and architects and listen to more laymen on this subject. I was not able to wrap my head around the whole fire making buildings explode theory until you called that guy a fool.

    Gee I better start parroting what I see on the TV or risk being called names by people that have been programmed to think they know everything.

  • "The World Trade Center was made to be able to withstand the impact of the major airliner of it's day"

    What you are missing is that both buildings withstood the impact of both airplanes.

    It was the damaging effect of the fire from all that fuel that it did not withstand. This is important as it set the building ablaze.

    Steel doesn't need to melt in order to weaken enough so that it bends and cracks. And once one floor collapses, the whole structure goes.

  • In crude terms, this wasn't some punk ass building. They built this thing to take withstand some ridiculous circumstances. Get over it people, set up, set up, set up, set up, set up, set up, set up, set up, set up.

  • about why the other buildings didnt collapse... uh hello! they were not hit by two giant commercial airplanes you son of a bitch

  • To be really honest, I don't know why theorists even LOOK at the WTC 1&2 collapse, because if they can prove 7 was taken down, then that CONFIRMS that 1&2 were because 7 could not have come down without at least a cover-story that the fires and damage from 1&2 were the cause. Therefore, if you're a truther, just look at WTC7- If you can prove that was taken down, then it is obvious 1&2 had to be taken down too. Still not proved though.....

  • i hope bush burns in hell for this man god bless america

  • @codysellers44 shut up

  • @codysellers44 bush was the best prestident e ever had

  • You don|t know why the buildings did not collapse?There was no airplane fule and then thats why the skyscrapers didn't fall.

  • Also the WTC collapsed so quickly because the inner wall were made of just sheet rock while the other buildings mentioned were composed of enitre concrete. Once the main column gave way the sheet rock walls collapsed like paper

  • Why do idiots like you participate in discussion when it is quite clear that you dont have a single clue about the twin towers or its history or construction

    Remember this ACES It is better to keep quite and be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt WHY NOT JUST READ INSTEAD OF TRYING TO WRITE YOU NUMBBRAIN

  • It was made of sheet rock. Watch the docudrama Inside The World Trade Center. You obviously had no retort and I assume you know as much about it as the common man. Dont think you are smarter than me boy

  • JOKER i dont THINK im smarter than you

    i KNOW Im smarter than you and even that requires little effort before commenting on this video dont just watch it like it was a cartoon learn how the building was constructed study the interviews with the actual architect who designed the building designed to take the impact of two 747s not just one 767 which is smaller twin engined

    and by the way Joker ive studied every document and video on the subject ive listened to the firefighter audio

  • You aren't smarter than me, Harvard graduate in the field of Architecture. You cannot compare this collapse to others because A: It was supported by sheet rock walls ( that people clawed through). and B) 9/11 is the only day ANY skyscraper has collapsed. EVER. Why? Jet fuel burned up the sheet rock and steel central column.

  • i believe you 100%. I also have some background in the overall structure of the world trade center. it is made of sheet rock like you said. didn't the empire state building get hit by a plane? i thought it did a long time ago and that held up. thelittleleprchaun obviously doesn't know what he's talking about; he's trying to be some know it all that tries to show everybody up.

  • You're not a Harvard graduate, I can tell just by reading your use of vocabulary. There were several columns holding up the building, jet fuel burns rapidly and almost immediately. The official explanation states that the fire continued to burn off of office papers, chairs, desks, etc. That is a ridiculous explanation. There was a fire on a steel-structured building still under construction in Madrid, Spain; it burned for over 22 hours, lost 10 floors from the heat, but it still did NOT collapse

  • Actually I am. i heard of the Madrid building but I didnt get hit by a plane did it? Thats the problem, you forget that fact. Buildings made of sheet rock walls and several central support columns wil collapse with a mix of force and prolonged danger

  • And you really think that it could just implode on itself like that? Not to mention the World Trade Center 7 building.

  • Well, thank you for that official explanation, Mr. Engineer. It takes simple physics to understand that the World Trade Center's wouldn't just implode on itself like that. There was secondary explosions, something else brought that building down like that. Just watch the damn video, it doesn't make sense unless explosives are involved. Just give it up, I'm not sure who did it, but it was a fucking set up.

  • This building in Madrid you speak of, was it hit by a plane? Or by anyother force moving as fast as a plane? Nevermind a commrcial airliner. I can't believe this is being debated. Oh well. Everyone is entitled to an opinion, no matter how inaccurate, or ignorant, they may be.

  • The World Trade Center was capable of withstanding the Boeing 707, the airliner of it's day. That plane had a faster cruising speed then today's 757. Jet fuel burns on impact, almost instantly. This would mean that the fire was left to burn on office supplies, concrete, sheet rock walls, and STEEL. Regardless, there was still 80-90+ floors that were undamaged in both. You have to just be ignorant or so shocked you couldn't believe that this could actually happen; to believe the official story.

  • That retort defended your belief in no way and was more of a personal attack as a way to make up for a lack of a returning thought

  • My retort; the World Trade Center was made to be able to withstand the impact of the major airliner of it's day. The Boeing 707 had a faster cruising speed then did today's 757. Jet fuel burns instantly, upon impact; this would entail that the fires were left to burn on building materials, office supplies, etc. There were numerous explosions heard by hundreds of eye witnesses throughout the building. This building was a wonder, capable of withstanding a 150 year hurricane.

  • the reason for multiple explosions in the WTC is in building material bursting due to the fire

  • one day you will accept what happened and move on ...

  • And with the towers the just happens to get a new terrorist attack plan that if they were to get attacked the owner would get $7,000,000 or some bull crap like that. Was 9/11 a conspiracy or wasn't it???

  • If it was a government project surly they could have done a proper job

  • Svitalykt the reason behind the Bush Administration attacking their own country is because Bush was a very unpopular president who wanted to carry on with his dads plans over Iraq he couldn't achieve this as the public had no faith in him , Hitler did the same tactic to the Reichstag, he burnt it to the ground its called a false flag tatic its where you attack yourself and blame it on your enemy , Hitler blamed commies and jews Bush blamed Muslims and terrorists

  • but why blowing the towers? i just dont get it(im from iceland so i dont know much of this)??

  • what i dont get is i live by a military base and my whole life i never heard a missle but my mind tells me it will sound like a jet plain what i have heard..these people they say it sounded like a missle where they hear a missile at before.

  • This is ridiculous, you seriously believe what you're saying?

  • where do ya'll think osama bin laden is hiding? prob. in hell

  • This is very intriguing.

    OMG dogz rox my sox.

  • Good beats

  • ..... find it real hard to accept that one jet each knocked them down, if you ever saw the footprint of those buildings you might just think differently. As for the demo aspect, watch the ones they do on t.v....they look very similar. As for the British dude, if it weren't for us 'wankers' here in the U.S. you guys would be doin' the goose step march singing "Deutchland"

  • if allll these facts are incorrect or false, how come no one has made a video refuting them? I personally saw those buildings being built, I

  • it's called censuring

  • Apparently....I saw a different video than a lot of some of the posters in here did, I saw a well written, well researched, well thought out...plausible theory....as to what MIGHT have happened. I believed what the press and government told us all, initially, but the more I see here (youtube) and other places makes me wonder....

  • Not enough people think for themselves, they just accept what is being fed to them no matter how stupid it may sound. This was obviously a controlled demolition. Hitler burned the Reichstag buildings for the same purpose, he then passed the enable act and used it to launch a war on Czech and Poland.

  • however we must accept all alternatives since there is no exact resolution on either side, or should i say on all sides, there are more than 2 options

  • I'm British, so fuck you all.

    1. Paul Laffoley was sacked as an architect of the world trade thingamejig for suggesting that the towers be reinforced in a certain way on certain floors. Go check him out you fucking morons.

    2. 9/11 was exactly the same scenario as Lusitania and Pearl Harbour, you dumb fucks.

  • Thank you Britishman, finally somebody knows their facts.But i have to argue if you believe that this recessition is an accident. Extremely rich banking families like the Rockefellars and the Roths own this country and use wars and recessions to gain power; i.e WWI, WWII, The Great Depression, the many recessions and the current one. But your right about the Lusitania and Pearl Harbour, they are plots to go to war when the government doesnt have the majorities support.

  • 3. There is now an entire social retaliation against The United State of Assfuck that will spread through politics and economics. The most corrupt yankee-doodle CUNTS were worth 12 trillion. Now they are worth nothing. THAT is your "financial crisis" you dumb yankee fuck-heads.

    4. Thank you and fuck off to uselesstube for providing me with a stage with which torture you fucking thick wankers with the truth.

    5. Fuck the USA.

  • oh man i wish one of you soft- pussy ass tea and crumpet eatin motherfuckers would say that shit to someone's face here. but i know that would never happen you guys are just too polite (to ppls faces at least) so stop trying to act hard and go lick the queens ass or whatever it is you do.

  • and these hobby phisicans want to analyse in a respecitve way the architecture of the WTC? lol ... even the structural engineers of the WTC that were in the North Tower that day messaged down to the lobby that some elevator funnels had failed and that a entire fail of the building might be possible as well... and these guys REALY knew what they were talking about ... get your ass to school and finish high school with a good certificate before mortising such crap..., with that techno beat, lol.

  • Amusing! You tell other's to go to High School and get a dgree, but can't even spell or construct a proper sentence! Dumbass!

  • no they should not have got blown away from the hightway... the stream of hot air blown from the engines of a jet is pushed behind not below, so 25 feet are comfortably enough to not get involved in this stream of air... those theories are just dumbshit, and thats the publicity they get, the approval of many idiots, and there are MANY of them, not only in the USA...

  • Precisely my point, douchebag. If the US would tend to their OWN problems instead of trying to bail out the rest of the world (while other civilized countries--like, um, CANADA sit on their asses and criticize), we might well be able to tend to our own problems. Besides, we might be bankrupt, but we don't hear about people flooding into Canada for a better life and better healthcare. Yeah, we've got our problems. Laugh all you want.

  • You think you have all the answers, but when the sh*t hits the fan, the world calls the USA, not Canada.

    P.S. Canada's not bankrupt, huh? How's YOUR system of universal healthcare working out?! About as well as our grossly mislead Democrat's plan. And yeah, they modeled it after yours, since it works so well. Hawaii did the same thing...and they went bankrupt in 7 MONTHS. Yeah, the dollar might be in the toilet right now. but they're still worth more than your yakbucks. Douche.

  • I am Canadian and want to say America should learn to be more Canadian and they wouldn't have these Problems !! America chose to go to War and now wants the World to Pay For it !! As a Canadian I like America !! But clean up your own crap and leave us Canadians out of it !! Canadians are Well liked Nation because We help the Needy not the Greedy !! And I am Sick of your Politics involving Canada !! We are Independant are We Canadians Whipped Your American Azzes in 1812 !! LMAO !!!!

  • You "help the needy not the greedy," huh? Who sent the most aid (not just $) to SE Asia when the tsunami hit in '04? Who still feeds and supports the peoples of countries whose governments want us dead (like N. Korea & Iran)? Who sends the largest amount of aid to Africa year after year after year? Guess...it ain't the UN! I too am tired of the US playing nursemaid & taking on the world's problems...but the minute there's a catastrophe, who does the world cry to for help, bitch? NOT Canada, ass!

  • Lol !! Well My Little Jedi I don't know if Yoda told You ?? "America is Bankrupt" not Canada !!! I know Why now America Voted for Obama was to bring in Education Program to America to Help Poor Bastards like You !!

  • Mary Ann Owens said that the plane flew over her 50 to 75 feet above her.The cars wouldnt have blown off the highway,because the plane was 5 feet behind the car,crazy video man,but I might be convinced by this.

  • Im a structural and chemical engineer (to much school) and there have been facts put out to prove some of these theories. so giantmdget08, stop putting people down when you yourself dont have all of the facts. Like I said without people like this wondering and looking into things the whole world would be a bunch of little puppets like you giantmidget.

  • Very true turbo700hp. It's always important to think outside the box and not just accept the information presented to us by our "unbiased" media. Then again, if everyone believed what the media said, the country could go and do something REALLY stupid by electing an American-hating, foreign-born Muslim as president who wants to remove our Constitution and undermine 230 years of tradition. Oh, wait...

  • theshakedownstreet is right, these planes were not going 500mph, they could not manuver like that if they were going that fast. The peak crusing speed of a boeing 737 is around 500mph, thats crusing speed and 30000 feet going in a straight line. The whole thing is fishy to me, at least this person can stand up for what they think and not be led around by what the government and mass media tells them.

  • zeitgeist movie , there is truth for you and facts so please do watch

  • xD

    AMEN

  • they collapsed probably because of their height?

  • Look here is something else interesting both tops of the world trade center had power outages before 9/11 and Bushes cousin was president of head security at World trade center.So 3 days after cleaning up the disaster at World trade center one of the search and rescue workers found a bunch of wires the looked liked they were cut though the nyc police reported this it never was on live tv and were threatened that if they told anyone else this they would be put in jail for life. weird huh?

  • IT WAS BUSH'S FAULT!

  • frenchboy, So you are saying that after these massive buildings fell that some wires got cut? Are you joking? After that the police threatened to imprison that person for life if he told anyone? What the fuck are you talking about? Stupidest comment ever on this subject. Who told you and will you be going to prison soon? conspiracy theory=bullshit.

  • If noone sees that its clearly a plot from our own government to keep the wars going they are really naive! I have always agreed with this and will continue to.

  • do you know if the World Trade Center will be rebuilt

  • it was a 757 jet

  • Look it could just be a coincedence but isn't it funny that if this theory is right the government decided to hit a CIA building. Maybe the government was affraid that they would meddle or something i dunno

  • He also wants to show the rest of the world that by going to war and taking over another country, he and the U.S. is still a country to be reconed with. 9/11 could of very well been a conspiracy by the government and i would be surprised if it really was.

  • And there are plenty of reasons why the government would want to do this or have motives to do something like this. I could see the bush administration doing this to "unite" our country and he could use the war to extned his time as U.S. president.

  • Things like CIA confiscating the tapes of the hotel near the pentagon and missing 2 six-ton 757 jet engines with the rest of the planes being supposedly "incinerated", in which it is scientifically impossible for titanium to even start melting at the temp the fuel vaporizes at.Also things about the cell phone call and saying your full name to your mom when you call, thats a little strange to me.

  • The video was very well put together. I think that with all the evidence presented in the video, it is highly possible that this was a conspiracy by the government, or that the government had extensive knowledge as to what was going on that day.

  • In regards to world trade center 7, it could be possible that it did collapse due the collapse of the other centers collapsing, but i think what makes this so controversial is because the government or whoever explained the collapse of tower 7 did not offer a convincing explaination.

  • I'm referring to the Pentagon attack!

  • The only thing that i agree that is how mysterious, suspicious, and wrong the government was to conceal the tapes immediately from a local gas station that captured the whole thing and only release fuzzy video captures that show no plane. Government portrays what they want you to see.

  • crueltyinperfection you can fuck off. We have the right to say what we think without discrimination and insults on how we look at things.

  • stupid jerk the twin towers colapset becouse a plane hit the jerk

  • The building was made to withstand such a plane from making it collapse.

    Sides, bombs went off several stories below the impact point shortly after, but not long enough for pieces of a plane to fall.

  • Ridiculous. Nothing but a bunch of factoids and photos assembled out of context by someone who has no idea what they mean, and who hasn't bothered to validate or corroborate their assertions by making falsifiable claims. It's shameful enough the Bush administration exploited a nation's grief in order to wage a pointless war. It's just as bad that these nitwits are co-opting a national tragedy to validate their twisted and paranoid view of the world.

  • 'Kay, first off, maybe you didn't bother to READ my topic paragraph discribing the video. It's based on OPINION, you flake. If you really think about it, everythings opinion. So maybe you should go get YOUR facts right before you go bashing on someone just because they dissagree with you.

  • @crueltyinperfection Shut the f.... up

  • You know what? I think your ignorant if you think that all these videos are saying is that we blew ourselves up. You should really do some research on what these people are saying and see if its true before you start making ubsurd notions.

  • Interesting subject! your videos are very good, I am from Afghanistan my self, and I believe that the American CIA or somethinf like that have a connection to 9/11

  • so do we

  • 911 was a pretext to get us to accept the "patriot act". the patriot act is constitutional heresy, It take away our right and give dictatorial power to the president even in a unnamed emergency. look at prisonplanet . c o m for more info.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more