Morton Downey Jr. was never funny. He was nothing more then a snake oil saleman. When he couldn't find interesting guests to appear on his show - They simply hired actors and made them up. Kinda like Springer does today. Muchlike pro wrestling without the ring.
Bill O'Reilly is the one who needs his career to end..He is an idiot and is the one who lies.. Rosie had the balls to question what happened.. I commend her in doing so.. :/
Fireworks display by Cai Guo-Qiang at the Arab Museum of Modern Art in Dohari demonstrates the lightning speed that detonation charges can be set off using computers. Notice how the sound of detonations at certain times sounds like one continuous roar. Much as we heard and saw when the 3 WTC buildings were brought down by controlled demolition in Set 11, 2001 at near free fall speeds. Easy when you have the technology.
Hahaha... Elizabeth is nonconfrontational? She actually is so confrontational and takes things so personally that she is incapable of having a real, adult debate without becoming bitchy and emotional.
iranian president anounced that bush was behind sep 11 attacks at the UN conference, and today al-qaida rejected those statements saying basically saying thats retarded lol, but wait, didnt rosie also say that same thing about the sep 11? i guess you could say Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Rosie O'Donnell are two peas in a pod bhahaha! these people are fucking jokes
@8bitZomB1E type in new wtc building 7 news footage,examine the damage for yourself,then type 911 debunked look for rkowens4 videos and if u have any questions just ask.you r welcomed
Is it me or do a lot of Americans talk shit! I can't understand this shit it's all blah blah blah blah blah burger blah inside job blah blah fat blah blah blah take a breath you cunt blah blah even fatter blah ceo blah fbi blah blah radioactive blah blah blah!!
I said hit not attacked(end effectt was the same anyway), now you are changing the specifics because I proved you wrong again. you do not need to go 500 mph to fully crash an airplane, just think of a 100mph carcrash into a solid wall. and this 500+mph was another attempt like the specific model below. its pretty obvious ww2 bombers could never reach that speed anyhow which didnt stop it from detonating and burning throughout few floors
So you call 80,000 lbs of jet fuel an office fire, there we go, theres some real logic.
I filled these jets,in the past for short flights that took 36,000 lbs.
Some of you people just don't have a clue that steel beam supported structures always fail from fire long before wooden beam structures that were built a hundred years ago.
Go downtown to the river front warehouse district,, they are all wooden beams construction that have been on fire several times and do not fail.
Steel infrastructure is fatally damaged at 600C when not protected by fire proofing. THAT was the major reason given in the 9/11 report as being the fatal factor in the beginning of the WTC collapses. It wasn't that the steel had melted, it was that the structural intregrity of the steel had been comprimised... please read the report. Even Loose Change creators have admitted that the official reason was valid, they just didn't believe that all floors could have collapsed.
As I pointed to him, it is 600C without steel fireproofing, roughly the same temp sthat jet fuel burns at. His given temp is what it takes to make it liquid steel, but 600C will make it as structually strong as a wax candle. That is what 9/11 report says happened. The fire prooofing was dislodged, the jet fuel burned at it's normal temp in WTC 1 and 2, while in WTC7 major fires burnt visibly(on video tape too!) for 7 hours(!), and figurative turned the steel into swiss cheese.
Steel frame buildings have obviously collapsed due to fire before and they will again. I don't need to bring up examples here because there are plenty. They may have been less high, but still you are lying by way of being unformedly incorrect.
It's not a valid reason to believe that it did not happen, considering there is a first time for everything(First time a 747 ever flew directly into a skyscraper too! let alone two of them!). So there is no need to do that as it serves no positive purpose.
saying its a first airplane of a specific model its like saying US president is the first US president to have a name Obama. it wasnt however the first time a plane hit a skyscraper and in fact it wasnt a first time a plane hit WTC, a fully loaded Bomber hit wtc yet nothing happened.
@colliric What steel frame building has EVER fallen due to fire? There are pleanty according to your shill so please just give me one example that I can investigate! JUST 1
What credibility does Bill O'Reilly have? Look 9/11 was an inside job and it's just a matter of when people look at the evidence.
Let me throw a question. You believe a 757 hit the Pentagon just to leave a 16-foot hole before the wall collapsed? You believe it's logical for a Commission to have started over 411 days after the events?
Yes, commissions usually start after the first investigations are concluded so yes I think just over a year and a bit is pretty good timing... all the initial investigations would be complete and the best amount of information would have been avalible from all the other ongoing investigations by the various departments. Commissions are not about beginning investigations, they are about collating the various investigations into one coheasive report.
@colliric Well why have the commissions for many other things started in a matter of a few days, whereas 9/11 took well over a year? And under duress? If the Bush Administration really cared about the people then it would have launched it immediately and had a public update every step of the way, but that was not the case at all and his whole conduct and behavior towards the whole thing is consistent with someone not telling us the truth.
Yeah that or it could be consistent with a man who is heading into a retaliation in Afganistan and orchestrating the removal of the taliban and the dispersion or destruction of Al Quaida. The Bush administration found this to be the primary issue and I'm sure you'll remember that they entered defcon 3 for only the 3rd time.
So a few days was probably going to be more than out of the question.
Dennis who? Joking about Rosie O´Donnell getting ´whacked´ and O´Reilly saying that there is a ´line´ Americans can´t cross...it´s called an opinion. 2 corporate money grabbing sheep assholes.
To face the truth is to realize that we are all in trouble. Our every freedom is going out the door and every time you turn your back on the truth you are turning your back on your American duity to protect freedom and defend the constitution.
911 is a fraud and all these NEOCONS know it. You Tube WTC 7 COLLAPSE and it is an obvious controlled demolition. 19 ARABS with boxcutters made those buildings collapse? Please! Watch WTC 7 COLLAPSE. It only takes 1 minute. And get your head out of the sand.
we are not a type to people. I am an individual person with my own mind. I lived in Israel for 20 years and I know what real terrorism looks like.I know nothing about England. I know 9/11 was an inside job because I studied this subject. Listen to pilots for 9/11 and read books on the subjects. I know there is a lot of b.s. on youtube but the fact is that 9/11 was an inside job; 10 second free fall can only be created by demolition.
No it's not a controlled demolition. It's not free fall. Just because it's close doesn't mean it is. Google the formula for the speed of free fall and figure out the formula. It's easy. There are no huge loud bangs, no flashes that all explosives makes. The collapse started from the impact zone not from the bottom up. I have yet to see anything resembling an actual controlled demolition.
Name one controlled demolition that doesn't have flashes. All of them do. That is a characteristice 9/11 deniers always ignore because it doesn't fit theire fantasy.
what's the point? there are flashes in the WTC on every floor, until it all turns into a cloud of smoke and you can't see any thing. you can't possibly tell me as a rational human being- that you believe that a local fire on top of the building could shred these buildings. if this was a possibility- than why did the fire fighters go into the buildings? want to see real terrorism? look at the attack in Bombay or Israel. what happened in NY was done by your government.
You said it. Clouds of smoke. Not flashes. The fire on top of the building did not shred the building. The combo of the fires and structural damaged doome the buildings. Did you really expect the towers to support all that weight. The firefighters were doing their job. Did you expect them to just assume the buildings were'nt going to fall. Firefighters didn't know if the building was going to fall or not. Aleast not initially. If they didn't do anything you would be talking trash now.
LOndon was an inside job, been confirmed by their own ploice dept. Google it.Oh sorry google reports must be bullshit. w3hy? its not massmedia or govt reports.wake up glasspig, Who is taken are freedoms? not arabs with boxcutters and thats a Fact!
You did not hear about the gold truck? It was found uner Tower 5 and was supposed to be under Tower 1. I flippe when they were putting all the ead bodies in the landfill. And, there was a shoot first ask questions later when they were retrieving the gold. Close to a billion in gold.
O'Reilly & Dennis Miller= Neo-Con shills. They are both closeted. Powerful people have the goods on both of them. They "advocate suppressing the truth rather than doing research and letting the American people make up their own minds." The Mainstream/Corporate Media elevates them and their careers and thus rather than leveling their critique at the existing social order, they realize that the being a neo-con pays better than being a revolutionary and a constitutionalist.
There is no cover up. Our government left us obvious clues to their involvement. WTC#7 is an example. It was a controlled demo. You know it and I know it. You may not want to believe it, but that's your denial. If WTC#7 was wired with explosives many weeks prior, then the whole 9/11 was orchestrated by our government because they needed security access. Bush and top brass played a role in the attack. Why can't Bill O'Reilly just accept this fact?
Really??? Wired with explosives weeks prior??? Then just wondering, why did they not find any of the wiring, tubing, blast caps???? Why could you not see the blast points before it fell??? Why couldn't you hear the explosions before it fell??? (and not one or two, but the dozens and dozens it would take to bring it down in what would have been the largest demolition in history) Have you ever actually watched a controlled demolition with the sound on?
ha, blast points, too funny, are you refering to the 8-10 "squibs" that they show from Loose Change and a few other places? This would be the largest demolition in history, there would be HUNDREDS of blast points, not less than a dozen tiny little "sqibbs" (not that I agree that thats what they are) So I take it that you are one that believes that the big explosions from the impacts wasn't enought to bring down the towers, but tiny little explosions that would make those samll squibbs, were??
You do not need to wire every floor. Especially a top to bottom implosion. It woul take 25-30 floors and have the core fall upon itself.
One or two even ten floors would ever collapse a 110 story building. It would have been a huge majorily expensive clean up bill.
And, also they were nnot looking for blasting caps, det cord, or traces of semtex or plastique. They were more worried about the gold. And, finding the gold truck.
Even neater that for what would be the largest demolition in history, they decided for the first time in the history of demolition to have a "top to bottom implosion demolition"
And if you are cleaning up the site, you do not have to be looking for caps, det cord etc to actually find it, either its there, or its not.
And looking for gold? You think all the rescue workers and firemen were all just looking for gold? So now you have the firemen looking for gold instead of survivors??
Military does a top to bottom on enemy builings prior to 9/11. It is used to kill not only those in building but those on the street. It is why it is illegal in the first place.
You need to have a trained eye to look for blasting caps and det cord. An, also if you notice there was not any bomb snifing dogs nor any type of ordance testing for explosives.
Both O'Reilly and Miller are advocates for suppressing the truth rather than doing research and letting the American people make up their own minds. News is supposed to be unbiased, but then again this is FOX.
you ever make a mistake and think you pressed a button but didnt because you were rushed? Have you ever had to type fast and couldnt read it over? Has your keyboard keys ever gotton stuck?millions of things could've happened, and thats why i didnt write those, sorry, im not perfect, and i dont type perfect english on the computer anyway, i type words that are easiest unless im writing something that actually matters
Rosie, while not the ideal posterchild for any movement is right. I DO STUDY THE 9/11 SUBJECT and have for 3 years 3-4 hours daily. I'm an expert and seen every bit of evidence and read on the history of those involved in funding the Hitler Project, those behind the Federal Reserve Corporation, and those in government today. Read Tarpley. Watch "Terrorstorm". The republic is in serious trouble as we have been overthrown by bankers who in the end steal everything.
I think that it's disgusting that they think they have to control her freedom of speech. O'Reilly I hope that you burn in the fiery pits of hell for your lies and ignorance. Nevermind, I revoke that, I shouldn't judge but I can't help myself because he says he's not conservatives, that's a despicable lie.
Yeah, you're really bright by following the word of Rosie fucking O'Donnell. Do yourself a favor and research the ridiculous claims she makes. You'll find when you look at reality based facts she is nothing but a big, bloated tub of hot air.
You should do the things you say yourself, research her claims, and you will find out she is TOTALLY right in what she says. Look at the FACTS please.
@onelovincriminal go fuck yourself... Im too busy playing Resident Evil: Revelation to respond to you.
colliric 1 week ago
@shadehunter1 your a bullshit artist who has no proof beyond blind faith....
colliric 1 week ago
Morton Downey Jr. was never funny. He was nothing more then a snake oil saleman. When he couldn't find interesting guests to appear on his show - They simply hired actors and made them up. Kinda like Springer does today. Muchlike pro wrestling without the ring.
SeanMBryans 2 weeks ago
I thought at one time that Bill was all right, sure changed my mine, He is a stupid jerk.
shadehunter1 2 weeks ago
Bill O'Reilly is the one who needs his career to end..He is an idiot and is the one who lies.. Rosie had the balls to question what happened.. I commend her in doing so.. :/
disposablefreedom 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Fireworks display by Cai Guo-Qiang at the Arab Museum of Modern Art in Dohari demonstrates the lightning speed that detonation charges can be set off using computers. Notice how the sound of detonations at certain times sounds like one continuous roar. Much as we heard and saw when the 3 WTC buildings were brought down by controlled demolition in Set 11, 2001 at near free fall speeds. Easy when you have the technology.
watch?v=bR5NmbHdUUs
harryramma 1 month ago
Hahaha... Elizabeth is nonconfrontational? She actually is so confrontational and takes things so personally that she is incapable of having a real, adult debate without becoming bitchy and emotional.
melissainnovascotia 2 months ago 2
@melissainnovascotia
so true, as long as you can prove, prove it.......other people may not like it, too bad
TheDHEL13 2 months ago
Hey Bill.....you sleep at night? When you look at yourself in the mirror, what do you really see?
MrLogicallity 3 months ago
id like to see oriely and rosie debate. i think rosie would win
smithdsmit 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
megamogx 4 months ago
iranian president anounced that bush was behind sep 11 attacks at the UN conference, and today al-qaida rejected those statements saying basically saying thats retarded lol, but wait, didnt rosie also say that same thing about the sep 11? i guess you could say Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Rosie O'Donnell are two peas in a pod bhahaha! these people are fucking jokes
89andyman 4 months ago
Does anybody know the actual official story on "Building 7" What's the official story of why it fell?
8bitZomB1E 4 months ago
@8bitZomB1E type in new wtc building 7 news footage,examine the damage for yourself,then type 911 debunked look for rkowens4 videos and if u have any questions just ask.you r welcomed
qqaaaqqq 2 months ago
Rosie is a big fat gay cunt
BUDx2 4 months ago
@BUDx2 and so are u eat her shit
akwelding 4 months ago
@akwelding Thats your job im sure you would love to eat that big gay asshole of hers its okay you can tell me.
BUDx2 4 months ago
@BUDx2 You sound like an intellectual.
KellyGreen5555 2 months ago
REAL EYES REALISE REAL LIES
forby24 5 months ago
Dennis Miller is bi-sexual, and a BOTTOM when he gets high.
gooty64 7 months ago
O'donnel for president tbh
ASHBOX86 9 months ago 10
@ASHBOX86 Fuck you bitch
mr300ism 5 months ago
@ASHBOX86 As long as it's Rosie, and not Christine :P
locutus94 3 months ago
Is it me or do a lot of Americans talk shit! I can't understand this shit it's all blah blah blah blah blah burger blah inside job blah blah fat blah blah blah take a breath you cunt blah blah even fatter blah ceo blah fbi blah blah radioactive blah blah blah!!
mentalmonkey26 10 months ago
O'Reilly is such an asshole !
JohnsaWozHere 10 months ago
@diemuslimsdie1
I said hit not attacked(end effectt was the same anyway), now you are changing the specifics because I proved you wrong again. you do not need to go 500 mph to fully crash an airplane, just think of a 100mph carcrash into a solid wall. and this 500+mph was another attempt like the specific model below. its pretty obvious ww2 bombers could never reach that speed anyhow which didnt stop it from detonating and burning throughout few floors
ImmortalHardOn 11 months ago
Dennis, you're so pathetic. I respect Bill O'Reilly more than you.
bluejetty01 1 year ago
You have been warned. Question 911 and your "career" will be ruined.
hdmf 1 year ago
tinkerbell, pinocchio, 7 DWARFS? loool, i think bill is mistaking the veiw with glen beck on fox hahhaah
Htowngurl123 1 year ago
Wow, Miller missed this one by a mile.
bman342 1 year ago
Really? America? This is one of your main news networks?!!!
WAKE UP!!!!!!!
DubScrub 1 year ago
those 2 guys are repressive dickheads.. claiming the opposition are bonkers.... honestly, propaganda 101
NeilM1989 1 year ago
theres a difference between being a racist, and telling the truth
zakiboy100 1 year ago
Lets hope that mainstream media goes bankrupt.
piraat6666 1 year ago
Even if flashes were visible, there are 1,000 bulbs on every floor. All being smashed at once under pancake of concrete.
Now the next floor and so on.
This doesn't take in account the thousands of voltage being severed.
There are the largest generators ever in the lower level trying to keep the building alive.
Millions of pounds of Airconditioned coolant under high pressure to every floor.
Can you image the pressure to just go 100 feet up?
So much of real data is just eliminated vs used.
Philscbx 1 year ago
So you call 80,000 lbs of jet fuel an office fire, there we go, theres some real logic.
I filled these jets,in the past for short flights that took 36,000 lbs.
Some of you people just don't have a clue that steel beam supported structures always fail from fire long before wooden beam structures that were built a hundred years ago.
Go downtown to the river front warehouse district,, they are all wooden beams construction that have been on fire several times and do not fail.
Philscbx 1 year ago
@Philscbx Only three steel frame buildings have ever fallen due to fire. Guess which three those are. Go ahead and guess.
pukeoncops123 1 year ago
@pukeoncops123
For one, you only being 20, it's obvious you never had a cutting torch in your hand, and what it takes to make steel soft as wax.
You don't have the slightest clue what temp that is.
Maybe a little less cartoons and Superman's demise of Kryptonite.
Know true physics of materials.
Speculation can't weld steel, only trained knowledge gets it done.
PUKE ON COPS, now that's creative thinking.
Must of had a bad day with the Judge.
Philscbx 1 year ago
@Philscbx I'm glad that you addressed my point and didn't ramble about how old you are and Superman. Oh wait...
Also, steel melts at 2500 degrees, jet fuel burns at 549.5 degrees.
pukeoncops123 1 year ago
@pukeoncops123
Steel infrastructure is fatally damaged at 600C when not protected by fire proofing. THAT was the major reason given in the 9/11 report as being the fatal factor in the beginning of the WTC collapses. It wasn't that the steel had melted, it was that the structural intregrity of the steel had been comprimised... please read the report. Even Loose Change creators have admitted that the official reason was valid, they just didn't believe that all floors could have collapsed.
colliric 1 year ago
@Philscbx
As I pointed to him, it is 600C without steel fireproofing, roughly the same temp sthat jet fuel burns at. His given temp is what it takes to make it liquid steel, but 600C will make it as structually strong as a wax candle. That is what 9/11 report says happened. The fire prooofing was dislodged, the jet fuel burned at it's normal temp in WTC 1 and 2, while in WTC7 major fires burnt visibly(on video tape too!) for 7 hours(!), and figurative turned the steel into swiss cheese.
colliric 1 year ago
@pukeoncops123
lies, all lies... and obvious lies at that.
you ment to say
"Only 3 skyscrapers have ever fallen due to fire"
Steel frame buildings have obviously collapsed due to fire before and they will again. I don't need to bring up examples here because there are plenty. They may have been less high, but still you are lying by way of being unformedly incorrect.
colliric 1 year ago 3
@colliric
please give me at least ONE example where a fire caused a skyscraper building to fall completly in a freefall fashion in under 2hours.
ImmortalHardOn 11 months ago
@ImmortalHardOn
It's not a valid reason to believe that it did not happen, considering there is a first time for everything(First time a 747 ever flew directly into a skyscraper too! let alone two of them!). So there is no need to do that as it serves no positive purpose.
colliric 11 months ago
@colliric
saying its a first airplane of a specific model its like saying US president is the first US president to have a name Obama. it wasnt however the first time a plane hit a skyscraper and in fact it wasnt a first time a plane hit WTC, a fully loaded Bomber hit wtc yet nothing happened.
ImmortalHardOn 11 months ago
@colliric What steel frame building has EVER fallen due to fire? There are pleanty according to your shill so please just give me one example that I can investigate! JUST 1
porfavorist 11 months ago
@colliric Name one
robplaysguitarr 5 months ago
@robplaysguitarr
piss off, this post was made over a year ago and frankly I'm bored with this shit....
Next time check the post date before digging up boring mouldy old shit.... you Nerd!
colliric 5 months ago
@colliric Show me where, Never has a steel framed building fell from fire alone, bring pruff not bull shit to the debate.
shadehunter1 2 weeks ago
@colliric name one that has fallen in less than 2 hours
onelovincriminal 1 week ago
@pukeoncops123 False. And these three didn't fall due to fire alone anyway. Quit spouting nonsense.
thedman113 1 year ago
What credibility does Bill O'Reilly have? Look 9/11 was an inside job and it's just a matter of when people look at the evidence.
Let me throw a question. You believe a 757 hit the Pentagon just to leave a 16-foot hole before the wall collapsed? You believe it's logical for a Commission to have started over 411 days after the events?
camreeno360 2 years ago
@camreeno360
Yes, commissions usually start after the first investigations are concluded so yes I think just over a year and a bit is pretty good timing... all the initial investigations would be complete and the best amount of information would have been avalible from all the other ongoing investigations by the various departments. Commissions are not about beginning investigations, they are about collating the various investigations into one coheasive report.
colliric 1 year ago
@colliric Well why have the commissions for many other things started in a matter of a few days, whereas 9/11 took well over a year? And under duress? If the Bush Administration really cared about the people then it would have launched it immediately and had a public update every step of the way, but that was not the case at all and his whole conduct and behavior towards the whole thing is consistent with someone not telling us the truth.
camreeno360 1 year ago
@camreeno360
Yeah that or it could be consistent with a man who is heading into a retaliation in Afganistan and orchestrating the removal of the taliban and the dispersion or destruction of Al Quaida. The Bush administration found this to be the primary issue and I'm sure you'll remember that they entered defcon 3 for only the 3rd time.
So a few days was probably going to be more than out of the question.
colliric 1 year ago
Dennis who? Joking about Rosie O´Donnell getting ´whacked´ and O´Reilly saying that there is a ´line´ Americans can´t cross...it´s called an opinion. 2 corporate money grabbing sheep assholes.
onesliceshort 2 years ago
To face the truth is to realize that we are all in trouble. Our every freedom is going out the door and every time you turn your back on the truth you are turning your back on your American duity to protect freedom and defend the constitution.
cyberneticsurferboy 3 years ago
911 is a fraud and all these NEOCONS know it. You Tube WTC 7 COLLAPSE and it is an obvious controlled demolition. 19 ARABS with boxcutters made those buildings collapse? Please! Watch WTC 7 COLLAPSE. It only takes 1 minute. And get your head out of the sand.
RON9463 3 years ago 2
100% correct
the Arab pilots couldn't fly passenger planes.
10 seconds free fall is controlled demolition.
sahar091 3 years ago
oh yeah sure you have "all the evidence in the world" for that.
your evidence= Wikipedia and Google
im just waiting to hear what bs you type of people have planned to say about the subway station bombings in england.
oh dont tell--THAT was an "inside job" too huh???
glasspig 3 years ago
glasspig
we are not a type to people. I am an individual person with my own mind. I lived in Israel for 20 years and I know what real terrorism looks like.I know nothing about England. I know 9/11 was an inside job because I studied this subject. Listen to pilots for 9/11 and read books on the subjects. I know there is a lot of b.s. on youtube but the fact is that 9/11 was an inside job; 10 second free fall can only be created by demolition.
sahar091 3 years ago
go get a dictionary (not google)
and look up the word SUBJECTIVE
that word, sums up entirely what all these imbecile "truthers" really are.
glasspig 3 years ago
I went to a dictionary; סוּבְּיֶקְטִיבִי
that's the translation. Happy?
Now what's that got to do with 9/11?
sahar091 3 years ago
Comment removed
sahar091 3 years ago
9.22 is the free fall speed of the towers and it took longer than that. You obviously can't count.
AmericasFan 3 years ago
Comment removed
sahar091 3 years ago
No it's not a controlled demolition. It's not free fall. Just because it's close doesn't mean it is. Google the formula for the speed of free fall and figure out the formula. It's easy. There are no huge loud bangs, no flashes that all explosives makes. The collapse started from the impact zone not from the bottom up. I have yet to see anything resembling an actual controlled demolition.
AmericasFan 3 years ago
Comment removed
sahar091 3 years ago
Name one controlled demolition that doesn't have flashes. All of them do. That is a characteristice 9/11 deniers always ignore because it doesn't fit theire fantasy.
AmericasFan 3 years ago
what's the point? there are flashes in the WTC on every floor, until it all turns into a cloud of smoke and you can't see any thing. you can't possibly tell me as a rational human being- that you believe that a local fire on top of the building could shred these buildings. if this was a possibility- than why did the fire fighters go into the buildings? want to see real terrorism? look at the attack in Bombay or Israel. what happened in NY was done by your government.
sahar091 3 years ago
You said it. Clouds of smoke. Not flashes. The fire on top of the building did not shred the building. The combo of the fires and structural damaged doome the buildings. Did you really expect the towers to support all that weight. The firefighters were doing their job. Did you expect them to just assume the buildings were'nt going to fall. Firefighters didn't know if the building was going to fall or not. Aleast not initially. If they didn't do anything you would be talking trash now.
AmericasFan 3 years ago
Not one demolition has every been conceived to start at the top ever.
They want the building down on the ground steered away from other structures.
Philscbx 1 year ago
LOndon was an inside job, been confirmed by their own ploice dept. Google it.Oh sorry google reports must be bullshit. w3hy? its not massmedia or govt reports.wake up glasspig, Who is taken are freedoms? not arabs with boxcutters and thats a Fact!
tone4624 3 years ago
what the fuck are they talking about
prelan 3 years ago
You did not hear about the gold truck? It was found uner Tower 5 and was supposed to be under Tower 1. I flippe when they were putting all the ead bodies in the landfill. And, there was a shoot first ask questions later when they were retrieving the gold. Close to a billion in gold.
TheStormchaser1 3 years ago
Rosie is insane.
WGST475 3 years ago
these two are butt buddies
blueninja1213 3 years ago
O'Reilly & Dennis Miller= Neo-Con shills. They are both closeted. Powerful people have the goods on both of them. They "advocate suppressing the truth rather than doing research and letting the American people make up their own minds." The Mainstream/Corporate Media elevates them and their careers and thus rather than leveling their critique at the existing social order, they realize that the being a neo-con pays better than being a revolutionary and a constitutionalist.
NYCConsigliere 4 years ago
ROSIE ROSIE ROSIE ROSIE
harryramma 4 years ago
There is no cover up. Our government left us obvious clues to their involvement. WTC#7 is an example. It was a controlled demo. You know it and I know it. You may not want to believe it, but that's your denial. If WTC#7 was wired with explosives many weeks prior, then the whole 9/11 was orchestrated by our government because they needed security access. Bush and top brass played a role in the attack. Why can't Bill O'Reilly just accept this fact?
felicity5150 4 years ago
Really??? Wired with explosives weeks prior??? Then just wondering, why did they not find any of the wiring, tubing, blast caps???? Why could you not see the blast points before it fell??? Why couldn't you hear the explosions before it fell??? (and not one or two, but the dozens and dozens it would take to bring it down in what would have been the largest demolition in history) Have you ever actually watched a controlled demolition with the sound on?
jeffmay1 3 years ago
if you cant see blast points you dont want too, have a closer look
12werblue 3 years ago
ha, blast points, too funny, are you refering to the 8-10 "squibs" that they show from Loose Change and a few other places? This would be the largest demolition in history, there would be HUNDREDS of blast points, not less than a dozen tiny little "sqibbs" (not that I agree that thats what they are) So I take it that you are one that believes that the big explosions from the impacts wasn't enought to bring down the towers, but tiny little explosions that would make those samll squibbs, were??
jeffmay1 3 years ago
point taken, i have only started checking out ALL of the evidence and my mind is not totally made up one way or the other,thanks
12werblue 3 years ago
You do not need to wire every floor. Especially a top to bottom implosion. It woul take 25-30 floors and have the core fall upon itself.
One or two even ten floors would ever collapse a 110 story building. It would have been a huge majorily expensive clean up bill.
And, also they were nnot looking for blasting caps, det cord, or traces of semtex or plastique. They were more worried about the gold. And, finding the gold truck.
TheStormchaser1 3 years ago
Even neater that for what would be the largest demolition in history, they decided for the first time in the history of demolition to have a "top to bottom implosion demolition"
And if you are cleaning up the site, you do not have to be looking for caps, det cord etc to actually find it, either its there, or its not.
And looking for gold? You think all the rescue workers and firemen were all just looking for gold? So now you have the firemen looking for gold instead of survivors??
jeffmay1 3 years ago
Military does a top to bottom on enemy builings prior to 9/11. It is used to kill not only those in building but those on the street. It is why it is illegal in the first place.
You need to have a trained eye to look for blasting caps and det cord. An, also if you notice there was not any bomb snifing dogs nor any type of ordance testing for explosives.
TheStormchaser1 3 years ago
Bill is a whore. His face sucks. His breath probably bad. His naked body Jesus wouldn't accept. Angry, ugly, stupid, republican.
FandangoSpears 4 years ago 2
Both O'Reilly and Miller are advocates for suppressing the truth rather than doing research and letting the American people make up their own minds. News is supposed to be unbiased, but then again this is FOX.
NcydeOUT 4 years ago 12
@NcydeOUT You sound like a babbling idiot.
RadarGuidedVermin 3 months ago
and your a ignorant, close minded democrate.
jajay444 4 years ago
jajay444,
It's you're not your. Now go read a book or maybe you listen to them?
FandangoSpears 4 years ago
jajay444,
You should've used "an" instead of "a" because ignorant starts with a vowel. The vowels are a,e,i,o,u and sometimes y. Peace not piece.
FandangoSpears 4 years ago
you ever make a mistake and think you pressed a button but didnt because you were rushed? Have you ever had to type fast and couldnt read it over? Has your keyboard keys ever gotton stuck?millions of things could've happened, and thats why i didnt write those, sorry, im not perfect, and i dont type perfect english on the computer anyway, i type words that are easiest unless im writing something that actually matters
jajay444 4 years ago
jajay444,
You started your sentence with a lower case "y". I don't know why you think I push buttons all day and forget them. That's ridiculous.
FandangoSpears 4 years ago
Rosie mature? give me a break!
KevinStorms 4 years ago
LoL God is not a slut... he really loves me he he
chult 4 years ago
people still watch O'REILLY? really? NO WAY!!!!!
SirLuchieus 4 years ago
o reilly you aint a patriot, you aint nuthing but a muthafuckin racist bitch
blackcapj 4 years ago
10 Million to the bank noope he's a sell out
SirLuchieus 4 years ago
what do u want it 2 fall like a tree TIMBER i thinck not
bartmanxoxo 4 years ago
Rosie O'Donnell is shit for shedding light on topics of truth. O'Reilly is acting like a gossiping teenager, atleast Rosie is more mature than that.
tramik2 4 years ago
Rosie, while not the ideal posterchild for any movement is right. I DO STUDY THE 9/11 SUBJECT and have for 3 years 3-4 hours daily. I'm an expert and seen every bit of evidence and read on the history of those involved in funding the Hitler Project, those behind the Federal Reserve Corporation, and those in government today. Read Tarpley. Watch "Terrorstorm". The republic is in serious trouble as we have been overthrown by bankers who in the end steal everything.
cart123948 4 years ago
I think that it's disgusting that they think they have to control her freedom of speech. O'Reilly I hope that you burn in the fiery pits of hell for your lies and ignorance. Nevermind, I revoke that, I shouldn't judge but I can't help myself because he says he's not conservatives, that's a despicable lie.
firehead2591 4 years ago
Go Rosie! The people are behind you! at least the well informed one. Nobody believes Bill's propaganda anymore.
Frost21122012 4 years ago
Unfortunately, too many people still watch Bill for news, not entertainment.
WemfRaver2003 4 years ago
Yeah, you're really bright by following the word of Rosie fucking O'Donnell. Do yourself a favor and research the ridiculous claims she makes. You'll find when you look at reality based facts she is nothing but a big, bloated tub of hot air.
nineinchtaint 4 years ago
You should do the things you say yourself, research her claims, and you will find out she is TOTALLY right in what she says. Look at the FACTS please.
Frost21122012 4 years ago