HD movies from the Moon - KAGUYA 「かぐや」による月面ハイビジョン撮影

[jinerik]

HD my ass. take this shit off Youtube.

[nokilt1]

imaging woulda been cooler if they at least aimed the camera straight down

i see no conspiracy to be had in this vid as other commenters seem to see

other than lack of stars

you can see stars in shuttle and space station footage, why not here?

as they circle the moon any photo contrast argument goes out the window

i'd like to see this in IR to see if stars showed up

this is from 100k up

you arent gonna see moon landing sites from this altitude playa

[DTNql242]

No HD here.

[Stonemagick]

@DTNql242 I got a HD view of this video.....Highly Distorted

[DTNql242]

@Stonemagick

I found the original Clips on the Jaxa-homepage and these are 720p. Here the max. Resolution I can chose is 480p (640x480px). I would be surprised if you can chose higher, can you?

[Stonemagick]

@DTNql242 480px is all I got/.

[sacha4you]

KAGUYA/Selene brought the hard proof, that all business-makers conspiracy theories about

'alien moon bases' and 'airbrushed moon structures' are not more than evil, misleading

hoaxes.

[nokilt1]

have you ever looked at the US navy website with moon photos?

lots of those photos have been modified

i had followed links to them as a non-believer like yourself, and became convinced photos have been airbrushed

the only question remains is what did they airbrush out

its not an evil misleading hoax unless you count NASA as evil and misleading

[sacha4you]

nokilt1, yes Sir, I'm rather familiar with the Clementine imagery. However, before you swallow the alien-bases-airbrushed-out-sna­ke-oil UFO/conspiracytainment industry serves you, I'd read the readme-section of the clementine browser: There is explained to full lenghts, data-gaps and erronous data have been completed with lower resolution data from alternative sources. For UFO crazies, neither familiar with digital image processing nor shadows, the result looks similar to a airbrush work.

;-))

[nokilt1]

i hear you sacha4you, but having looked at those photos off the official site, i can tell you that at least a couple you can see something poking out from behind the edge of the smudging

could just as easily be military hardware as 'alien'

-conspiratainment-

nice word/observation

good insite

[sacha4you]

nokilt1, hypothetically, there could be military observational equipment. However, if this were true, US violated the international non-militarization of space treaty [1969], and there would be an outcry from other nations. Please have a closer look at these blurry sections: Althouth the shown patches are huge, there are NO SHADOWS. Then the shapes are either (near) triangular, rectangular, or composed from it. That's rather indicative for US Navy's the defective data replacement claim.

;-))

[curea229]

It's funny how some people transfer their "1960's Apollo man on the moon hoax" theories to 21st century unmanned probes. They don't gripe about probes going to Mars, but the moon is apparently impossible to get to. Notice also there's no stars in space shuttle pics around the earth, so the shuttle must be fake too.

[msdnvp]

the sky was erased. i agree, you really think the japanese will give out raw data to the public and japan got american base. ? dont think so. never trust thats american.

[bossmantd]

the sky was erased.

[haobin420]

There is also no stars.

[hyperkinetic]

Get a clue. Stars are too dim to show up against the brightness of the moon using nearly ALL camera technology.

[throttlelever]

I wonder if the TC has really a definition of 10 meters. Pretty rough granularity for an HDTV camera. I find it suspicious news. I also wonder to what extent JAXA will reveal what NASA has been brusing out. Possibly there is some kind of treaty between the two. Yakuga is able to record Apollo remains and artefacts on the Moon. Now is the wait ...

[throttlelever]

Oops typo brusing --> brushing

[kokoden6]

where is naruto kimimaro?

[davos6666]

where are the starts???? it is supossed to be in the moon, and there is no atmosphere there...so the stars should be visibles there unless the video is a hoax..hey are using the state of the art in technology, and there is no stars...?. the tv channel should show a video with the stars there.

mhmmm...

[throttlelever]

Stars are visible with the naked eye from Earth because the atmosphere has a magnifying effect. In outer space, stars look a lot smaller. Also for the camera.

[davos6666]

thanks. I requested the JAXA how can they show that the images are real, and they are showing now images of a earth-rising with a cenral point of view from the moon. Telling that it can be watched only from the moon. :)

[hyperkinetic]

Stars aren't bright enough to show up against the moon. If the camera were adjusted to pick up the stars, the moon would be over exposed and no detail would be visible.

[simbiotic]

wheres the alien bases wheres the ice caps wheres the american landing site wheres the luner rover . america is full of shit.

they didnt even go there america just likes to lie and blow things up. america is the bigest liying terorist nation in the world.

ps im maried to an american. its not the people its the illuminati government !

[hyperkinetic]

Serious dude, do us all a favor and stop breaking your pills in half! The lunar landing sites aren't visible because this video was taken from 100 km up! Kind of IMPOSSIBLE to photograph something < 1m from 100,000m away! But then why bother with FACTS when you can just cry about the black helicopters?