I wish this was in the film but then I didn't really like the scene's with Emma Thompson's son enough for them to replace anything and so this couldn't really be in it also. =[ At least there's still loads of Emma Thompson...
Although I think this would have a been a really great scene to have kept, I think the film was perfect the way it was. Perhaps it didn't quite fit, I don't know.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
glad this scene was deleted. so over the whole gay crap. in every movie they try to weave a gay lifestyle into it. so sick of it. every second actor is gay just so they can make it in hollywood. get back to making good movies
@pollyyview What absolute nonsense. This lifestyle was not "woven" into the movie -- it merely elaborated on one storyline! Your sickening contempt for any gay content in a movie seems to cause you to generalize any such content on the basis of it simply being there. This was a tender, beautiful scene and if it isn't "good enough" for you, then you can go bugger off yourself.
A touching scene indeed! How wonderful! Perhaps the disease was AIDS but either lung or breast cancer is also possible. A whole movie could actually be made out of their story I'm sure.
@vinnihouseaddict8854 Aids is actually very unlikely. Lesbians have the smallest chances of anyone getting aids. If she had aids she must either have gotten it from an old boyfriend or a blood transfusion. Some kind of cancer is far more likely.
They needed to cut a lot out of the film to make it viewable, but I really thought that these were touching scenes. Beautifully and subtly acted and really very very sad too.
@fukuokaai228 I think it was probably supposed to be lung or breast cancer, just from the way that she clutched her side in pain while laughing. While you can see a bit of hair under it, she was also wearing that headscarf, which makes me think that maybe she was supposed to be having chemotherapy. Just a theory of course, and they may not even have defined the terminal illness that she was supposed to have.
Typical homophobic, chauvinistic Richard Curtis. This is another contributing reason to why I like Valentines Day better than Love Actually; no bigotry whatsoever.
@irocklove14 They only cut this scene because it was completely dependent on another scene that they had to cut due to time constraints. Bigotry had nothing to do with it.
@amolastoria i was just saying in general; that there's a lot more aspects of the film that does show bigotry. i like the actors, its just richard curtis i'm not too crazy about.
@pineapplegirl01 You ask why the messed up subtitles. It's because our uploader, thinking s/he was being so very clever, instead found the one way to most distract & annoy those who chose to view the clip, and thus destroy their ability to enjoy it.
It makes one wonder whether some people really do have such an overwhelming desire to prove their own belief in their worthlessness that they unknowingly self-sabotage their every effort. Incomprehensible.
Omgosh so sorry didn't mean to flag I don't think I can undo it :-/ I just wanted to say that this was beautiful and they really should have kept it in the movie it wouldve made it much better
@Elrich89 Actually there was supposed to be two. There was originaly another gay couple, two little girls falling in love to mirror the little boy's crush on the girl. Apparently that one was cut before it was even finished being made. Sigh.
o
-|-
/\
gabriella2370 2 months ago
Can't believe they cut this out. So touching. I would have rather seen this one than the naked couple, personally.
paperflower091 3 months ago 11
How could they delete this, TEARS <3
MagicAuror67 3 months ago
Fuck heteronormative society.
LillyBelle951 3 months ago
I wish this was in the film but then I didn't really like the scene's with Emma Thompson's son enough for them to replace anything and so this couldn't really be in it also. =[ At least there's still loads of Emma Thompson...
moogle301 3 months ago
Why did they cut this out? It was a very poignant scene.
warriorbard 3 months ago
Beautiful & sad❣ ♀❤♀
jharker37 3 months ago
They should have left this little scene in the film.
Acquafortis 3 months ago 5
yeh they should have left this in the movie
kflashman33 3 months ago 2
1:02 to skip to the deleted scene X)
blueberry654 4 months ago
a wonderful scene - wish they had left it in!!
AmyJane0511 6 months ago 2
Wow... I wish they had kept this scene.
TheVildee 6 months ago
My favourite deleted scene...makes me cry every time
pineapplegirl01 6 months ago
i ove this.. i realy wish they keept it
hopgoblen 7 months ago
aww It's Madame Olympe Maxime from Harry Potter :)
saphique 9 months ago 12
Although I think this would have a been a really great scene to have kept, I think the film was perfect the way it was. Perhaps it didn't quite fit, I don't know.
lovely <3
xoxpenguinxox 10 months ago
they're such a cute couple!!
partygirl209 10 months ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
glad this scene was deleted. so over the whole gay crap. in every movie they try to weave a gay lifestyle into it. so sick of it. every second actor is gay just so they can make it in hollywood. get back to making good movies
pollyyview 1 year ago
@pollyyview What absolute nonsense. This lifestyle was not "woven" into the movie -- it merely elaborated on one storyline! Your sickening contempt for any gay content in a movie seems to cause you to generalize any such content on the basis of it simply being there. This was a tender, beautiful scene and if it isn't "good enough" for you, then you can go bugger off yourself.
SwedishSkinJer 1 year ago 6
A touching scene indeed! How wonderful! Perhaps the disease was AIDS but either lung or breast cancer is also possible. A whole movie could actually be made out of their story I'm sure.
vinnihouseaddict8854 1 year ago
@vinnihouseaddict8854 Aids is actually very unlikely. Lesbians have the smallest chances of anyone getting aids. If she had aids she must either have gotten it from an old boyfriend or a blood transfusion. Some kind of cancer is far more likely.
sinaain 10 months ago 3
They needed to cut a lot out of the film to make it viewable, but I really thought that these were touching scenes. Beautifully and subtly acted and really very very sad too.
thegreenmanofnorwich 1 year ago 4
that was a beautiful scene.
what was wrong with geraldine? anybody happen to know?
fukuokaai228 1 year ago
@fukuokaai228 I think it was probably supposed to be lung or breast cancer, just from the way that she clutched her side in pain while laughing. While you can see a bit of hair under it, she was also wearing that headscarf, which makes me think that maybe she was supposed to be having chemotherapy. Just a theory of course, and they may not even have defined the terminal illness that she was supposed to have.
thegreenmanofnorwich 1 year ago 3
@thegreenmanofnorwich oh right, i see. thanks for clarifying. i thought it might be but i wasnt sure, thanks again :-).
fukuokaai228 1 year ago
@fukuokaai228 Like I say, it's just a guess really, but it would be the most probable disease I can think of.
thegreenmanofnorwich 1 year ago
SO happy I found this scene! That fact that there was a lesbian couple, even in the deleted scenes....makes me so happy.
RainbowMitten 1 year ago
That made me cry
Bravo!
bootsorourke 1 year ago
can't believe they deleted it. not only were they the token gay couple, but it was a touching story line to throw in the mix as well..
ah well :/
ffrancesccaaaa 1 year ago
Having a gay couple present in the film would've raised it to a much better picture! can't believe they cut it :(
JulielovesTandS 1 year ago
awww...I WOULDN'T MIND IF THE MOVIE WAS 3 HOURS LONG
they don't have to cut it to make it shorter!
fabfourgroupie 1 year ago 3
Is the woman who died the English teacher from The History Boys???
pirates09rock 1 year ago
@pirates09rock Yup, it's Frances De La Tour. She's been in loads of stuff.
thegreenmanofnorwich 1 year ago
Love
Y7FFVGcQ 1 year ago
Typical homophobic, chauvinistic Richard Curtis. This is another contributing reason to why I like Valentines Day better than Love Actually; no bigotry whatsoever.
irocklove14 1 year ago
@irocklove14 Umm, Richard Curtis wrote the film, so that statement made no sense.
bleedblue83 1 year ago
@bleedblue83 actually my statement made perfect sense and you just confirmed it with yours.
irocklove14 1 year ago
@irocklove14 They only cut this scene because it was completely dependent on another scene that they had to cut due to time constraints. Bigotry had nothing to do with it.
amolastoria 1 year ago
@amolastoria i was just saying in general; that there's a lot more aspects of the film that does show bigotry. i like the actors, its just richard curtis i'm not too crazy about.
irocklove14 1 year ago
why are the subtitles so messed up?
pineapplegirl01 1 year ago
@pineapplegirl01 You ask why the messed up subtitles. It's because our uploader, thinking s/he was being so very clever, instead found the one way to most distract & annoy those who chose to view the clip, and thus destroy their ability to enjoy it.
It makes one wonder whether some people really do have such an overwhelming desire to prove their own belief in their worthlessness that they unknowingly self-sabotage their every effort. Incomprehensible.
jum1801 1 year ago
@jum1801 They have far more to do with youtube than me actually.
MollyPrewittWeasley 1 year ago
@jum1801 oh ok how do you know? :( great clip though and an amazing film :)
pineapplegirl01 1 year ago
in film school they warn you to be prepared to cut your favorite scenes. its so brilliant, but he had to cut it out
MrBlacklabel5150 1 year ago
What was with the subtitles
theatrekid07 1 year ago
I just saw Frances de la Tour in The History Boys, and I am mesmerized. Such a fine actress, she is.
Although this wasn't in the movie, it was one of the better scenes.
naibotG 1 year ago
why does this english video have these rotten and totally wrong english subtitles?
einkaufszentrum 1 year ago
what kind of subs are these?:P
f4kadak 1 year ago
Comment removed
Ilovecats112233 1 year ago
Comment removed
Ilovecats112233 1 year ago
Comment removed
Ilovecats112233 1 year ago
Omgosh so sorry didn't mean to flag I don't think I can undo it :-/ I just wanted to say that this was beautiful and they really should have kept it in the movie it wouldve made it much better
gypsygirl999 1 year ago
ha ha ha voice recognition cc? gotta love it!
bbrittany 1 year ago
The film's only gay couple - and they cut it. Utter bastards.
Elrich89 2 years ago 111
@Elrich89 Actually there was supposed to be two. There was originaly another gay couple, two little girls falling in love to mirror the little boy's crush on the girl. Apparently that one was cut before it was even finished being made. Sigh.
JustAPrayer 8 months ago
Ditto what elv1558 said. I always fast forward the scenes w/ the Judy & Jim. Boring! This would have been a much better addition.
malteseheart 2 years ago 5
Comment removed
Ilovecats112233 2 years ago
Comment removed
Ilovecats112233 2 years ago
oh that was great! they should have kept that scene in!
lostpinguin 2 years ago 6
I kind of wish they'd left bernerd and these scenes in and cut the couple who met being body doubles out.
elv1558 2 years ago 81
@elv1558 I agree!!! These scenes were much more interesting because they added dimension to the already central characters.
24fans4life 1 year ago
@elv1558 What, and get rid of Martin Freeman? No way!
M4rple 1 year ago
Quite a few tender moments.
minpchen 2 years ago 4
I'm so sad they cut this.
FranBMan 2 years ago 12
beautiful :(:)
alyjane1 2 years ago 6