Gun control is a step further to disarming the American people ,the government know that this organized economic crash and super-inflation will bring people out on the streets with their guns just imagine Egypt if all the people were armed like America,This is why it is written in the Constitution that the American people have the right to arm themselves "to protect themselves from Corrupt Governments".
Newt is a lifetime member of the National Rifle Association, and speaks regularly at the NRA’s Annual Meeting. He received an A or A-plus rating from the NRA all ten terms that he served in the House of Representatives, and received the NRA’s Defender of the Second Amendment award in 2010.
I'm sorry, but Conservative Chrisitans are dumb. They believe that the embodiment of their God (Jesus) delivered a message of peace and pacifism, but at the same time they believe it is their God given right to carry weapons at all times? This paradoxical thinking is what allows them to be dicks to the entire world but still claim it is in the pursuit of peace. Based on their notion of the character of Jesus, I'm pretty sure he would not carry a weapon at all.
@flywheel702 First of all, that is taken out of context. The strong man is either Satan or a sinful man. The excerpt in and of itself wouldn't even make any sense if we maintain the immaterialistic nature of Jesus that is often preached, not that it would be the first contradiction in the bible, however. . . Secondly, for anyone to take the bible literally in the year 2012, they would have to be retarded. Either that, or extremely delusional.
@rarmst2 This fallacy of "baby Jesus meek & mild" is a common misnomer. If you were to read the New Testament you would know this. In this verse Jesus is being slandered. He makes a direct & penetrating response. By saying "this is taken out of context" you disagree with it. So you would allow criminals to invade your home, rape & kill your wife & children, & loot your home? Really? But it's ok for a criminal to do that because the Bible isn't relevant & we're retarded. Good argument.
@flywheel702 You are putting words in my mouth. The passage isn't necessarily about criminals at all. Also, the fallacy you mention isn't necessarily so. There are many stories (emphasis on story) in the bible that present character traits of Jesus. Many are quite contradictory, which isn't suprising seeing as the New Testament was written about 150 years after the death of Jesus. Among other things, this is what makes the Bible irrelevant. Stop deluding yourself.
@flywheel702 Furthermore, if you are trying to reference the bible as THE source for morality amongst human, then you are retarded. There are many societies that function quite well (low murder/rape/theft per capita) that disregard the bible. There are also many soceities that take the bible literally (ie. middle eastern countires and the bible belt) and these areas we see a much higher rate of what we would call moral crimes or atrocities. Morality is developed socially and evolutionarily.
@rarmst2 I didn't say I reference the Bible as THE source for morality. I simply said there are many examples in the Bible which reference the right to bear arms. As you can't discuss a subject without making personal insults I'll refrain from making any further replies.
@flywheel702 Even furthermore, I'm not fighting against the right to own weapons. I am neutral on the topic. I just think that it is stupid to be referencing the bible in this day and age. Using this same logic, all individuals have the right to own nuclear weapons. I'm sure even you can see the issue with this, which the writers of the bible could not have possibly forseen as its writing was not at all divinely guided.
Now if I was Newt giving that speech,? I would of ended it like this. " Now as I leave you let me echo the words of another President that I admired, " FROM MY COLD DEAD HANDS" I think that the crowd would of went wild.? I like Newt over Romney in November.?
@LAFD54 So basically what you're saying is that you're for helplessness? Here's some justification for you: How about your mother is robbed and carjacked, or your wife is robbed and raped? You're saying they would not be justified in carrying a gun? If you are against owning and carrying a firearm, then you are FOR stripping law abiding citizens of their God given right to self-defense.
Everyone needs to be anti-gun! If you want a gun, join the army idiot. What we don't need are untrained, trigger happy civilians out there just waiting to use a gun during a violent conflict. If you morons want to carry a gun, join the police or armed forces. You see how effective carry a firearms is, violent crime is at an all time high. Civilians have NO justification for carrying any firearms. All this does is strokes their egos and makes them WANT to get involved in violent confrontations.
@officialusa You attributed that sentiment to Ron Paul? Those words are not unique to Ron Paul. Those are the words of every pro gun commentator who knows his history.
@iMovieRox I was a member of CRF, too. And, I volunteered over 500 hours for Ronald Reagan. I was taught that you should always know what your opponents are saying so that you can muster information to rebut them...
We're gonne need em if he's in charge. Because once he closes all foreign US military bases, and pulls every troop back into the 50 States, the rest of the world is gonna go to shit. We're all going to need as many guns as we can possible to keep ourselves safe as the rest of the neighborhood goes to shit!
He just got my vote. Newt is an amazing speaker but I want to point out one thing that is not very well known. He is good friends with William Fortschen, author of One Second After and he is a supporter of EMP awareness. As a matter of fact he even wrote the forward for One Second After. In this very speech Newt mentioned him as Bill Fortschen. If your a gun rights supporter and or prepper then Newt should be your candidate. Please don't just youtube his vids next November. GET OUT AND VOTE!
@carolinaridgerat -- Just thought you should know that Ron Paul is a firm supporter of the right to carry and own firearms. This audio clip makes that quite clear. I just thought you would be interested to know if this is an important issue for you:
@pattymcpatterstud1 A disgrace? "I'm very much in favor of stopping people who engage in violence against their spouses from having guns. I think that's a very reasonable position." That is a disgrace? Its a position that some see as a necessity. And, its wrong to do background checks so that felons can not buy a gun? Patty? Why did you tell us to do our research? Figured we would not?
@genemz5 “As long as I am Speaker of this House, no gun control legislation is going to move in committee or on the floor of this House and there will be no further erosion of their rights.” Voted for "gun free zones act" that contained the Lautenberg gun ban, which lowered the threshold for losing one’s Second Amendment rights to a mere misdemeanor. He even refused to cosponsor a repeal of the assault weapons ban during the next Congress...etc. Actions speak louder than words, my friend.
@genemz5 Actually look what was in that Bill and not his response to it. The "violent crime against spouses" was to get people on board with the Bill. Misdemeanors at home could be considered "domestic violence."
@pattymcpatterstud1 Violent crimes against spouses is a valid reason. JANUARY 20--A Wisconsin man charged with domestic abuse told cops that a “ghost” was actually responsible for injuries suffered by his wife, according to police. The victim told cops that West twice strangled her, and that he punched her in the face when she tried to dial 911. Just a misdemeanor... I see. Newt made no sense. Just a misdemeanor.
@genemz5 This ONE case should have been a felony. That crime was no misdemeanor. Felons are prohibited in purchasing firearms...that is fine. In that particular case the problem lies with the charge. If Newt was so great for the Second Amendment, why didn't he repeal the assault weapons ban? He controlled the majority of the House.
@kylem977 The 105th Congress had 55/100 Republican Senators, 227/435 Republican Congressmen. There are also many pro second amendment Democrats in the south and midwest. He had plenty of people that could have been on board with a repeal but did not even try.
@pattymcpatterstud1 So Mr.patty-when do you think Obama and his administration will be giving a speech about the second amendment that we will enjoy?hmmm.
@COYOTE165A If you want to support one who flip flops rather than someone who actually believes with conviction our 2nd Amendment Rights, then support Newt. I would never support someone who voted for the Department of Education, voted for the Fairness Doctrine, who likens himself with Teddy Roosevelt, and who is apart of the UN-Loving and anti sovereignty group Council on Foreign Relations. I would head caution for anyone supporting a Neo Con who will appoint the next Supreme Court Judge.
I'm a long-time fan of Newt's, but I don't think the average American will be down for a smart argument. I think the average Joe or Jane needs something less intellectual and more gut-instinct. Or, more probably, something totally wishy-washy like Romney. It's annoying to someone of my thinking, but hey, what can you do?
us libertarians will eat you out of touch conservatives soon....i hate it when i tell people im against obamacare and support the second ammendement that people think im a war mongering homophobe like newt
@mstrhck yes shake in your boots remember we went from close to zero libertarian republicans in 2007 to many and were on the rise please shake in your boots
It will be a nice values tour. lol The evil republicans have given up another year to the stupid democrats. Nobody is electable on the republican side. What.. Newt with pick your bimbo (Palin. or if thats not stupid enogh. Bachman). Romney believes in that the "son of god" was in the americas. Huckabee was the only threat and he likes his show. Ron Paul is the only sane one in the bunch, but even he is nuts in areas. Rednecks will get behind anyone that they think can beat the "articulate" guy.
@flywheel702 Actually he's a huge hypocrite and will take away your 2nd amendment right in a heartbeat. He is ranked at the bottom for gun owner rights. You tube RON PAUL if you like our constitution.
Newt will never ever be President. Regardless of how thrilling ?? is speeches are, the general public has never forgiven him for the cancer scandal involving his wife, nor his cheating on women ways. The only way Newt might have a chance is by finding and killing the 2 man behind Osama Bin Laden.
Most Liberals can speechify... Newts are slimy chameleons. Like any politician, don’t listen to what they say, wacht what they do… Study history. Newt is a dangerous man… You are Warned…
Yes he is dangerous to those who hate this country,those who hate the God of our fathers, and those who hate the historic basis of this nation.God bless him.
@video951 Putting aside his duplicity, his political prolix and his RECORD (don‘t forget his history of liberal tendencies), He speaks big words of conservatism. But when his words are put to the test, his actions should speak louder than his words. I am not saying he is a bad man. Just that we should remove the blinders and take in the whole picture. Then carefully choose who we support with the full knowledge they all say what ever the political climate dictates in order to get elected.
I heart Newt. GREAT SPEECH. I never thought of what he said about the right for us to bear arms ALREADY existed, before the Constitution was written. Newt is brilliant.
This has been flagged as spam show
Gun control is a step further to disarming the American people ,the government know that this organized economic crash and super-inflation will bring people out on the streets with their guns just imagine Egypt if all the people were armed like America,This is why it is written in the Constitution that the American people have the right to arm themselves "to protect themselves from Corrupt Governments".
bladerunner123ish 3 weeks ago
Newt is a lifetime member of the National Rifle Association, and speaks regularly at the NRA’s Annual Meeting. He received an A or A-plus rating from the NRA all ten terms that he served in the House of Representatives, and received the NRA’s Defender of the Second Amendment award in 2010.
stevelatinner 3 weeks ago 6
It will be a cold day in Houston before I support this very interesting character.
idahofalls1973 1 month ago
@idahofalls1973 I hope it snows in Houston this week.
shepherdpeter1 3 weeks ago
"RON PAUL has been a leader in the fight to defend the second amendment" Larry Pratt, Executive director,Gun owners of America
RON PAUL 2012
huntingtonbeachify 1 month ago
I'm sorry, but Conservative Chrisitans are dumb. They believe that the embodiment of their God (Jesus) delivered a message of peace and pacifism, but at the same time they believe it is their God given right to carry weapons at all times? This paradoxical thinking is what allows them to be dicks to the entire world but still claim it is in the pursuit of peace. Based on their notion of the character of Jesus, I'm pretty sure he would not carry a weapon at all.
rarmst2 1 month ago
@rarmst2 Luke 11:21 “When a strong man, fully armed, guards his own house, his possessions are safe." This is just one biblical directive.
flywheel702 1 month ago
@flywheel702 First of all, that is taken out of context. The strong man is either Satan or a sinful man. The excerpt in and of itself wouldn't even make any sense if we maintain the immaterialistic nature of Jesus that is often preached, not that it would be the first contradiction in the bible, however. . . Secondly, for anyone to take the bible literally in the year 2012, they would have to be retarded. Either that, or extremely delusional.
rarmst2 1 month ago
@rarmst2 This fallacy of "baby Jesus meek & mild" is a common misnomer. If you were to read the New Testament you would know this. In this verse Jesus is being slandered. He makes a direct & penetrating response. By saying "this is taken out of context" you disagree with it. So you would allow criminals to invade your home, rape & kill your wife & children, & loot your home? Really? But it's ok for a criminal to do that because the Bible isn't relevant & we're retarded. Good argument.
flywheel702 1 month ago
@flywheel702 You are putting words in my mouth. The passage isn't necessarily about criminals at all. Also, the fallacy you mention isn't necessarily so. There are many stories (emphasis on story) in the bible that present character traits of Jesus. Many are quite contradictory, which isn't suprising seeing as the New Testament was written about 150 years after the death of Jesus. Among other things, this is what makes the Bible irrelevant. Stop deluding yourself.
rarmst2 1 month ago
@flywheel702 Furthermore, if you are trying to reference the bible as THE source for morality amongst human, then you are retarded. There are many societies that function quite well (low murder/rape/theft per capita) that disregard the bible. There are also many soceities that take the bible literally (ie. middle eastern countires and the bible belt) and these areas we see a much higher rate of what we would call moral crimes or atrocities. Morality is developed socially and evolutionarily.
rarmst2 1 month ago
@rarmst2 I didn't say I reference the Bible as THE source for morality. I simply said there are many examples in the Bible which reference the right to bear arms. As you can't discuss a subject without making personal insults I'll refrain from making any further replies.
flywheel702 1 month ago
@flywheel702 No you won't.
rarmst2 1 month ago
@flywheel702 Even furthermore, I'm not fighting against the right to own weapons. I am neutral on the topic. I just think that it is stupid to be referencing the bible in this day and age. Using this same logic, all individuals have the right to own nuclear weapons. I'm sure even you can see the issue with this, which the writers of the bible could not have possibly forseen as its writing was not at all divinely guided.
rarmst2 1 month ago
Now if I was Newt giving that speech,? I would of ended it like this. " Now as I leave you let me echo the words of another President that I admired, " FROM MY COLD DEAD HANDS" I think that the crowd would of went wild.? I like Newt over Romney in November.?
COYOTE165A 1 month ago
I checked out the House vote for this bill for H.R. 3355 and Newt's vote? No GA-6 Gingrich, Newton [R]
I'm not for sure who is spreading the word that Newt supported or voted for the Assault Weapons Ban, but it isn't true.
genemz5 1 month ago
New is a liar if you believe anything he says your just as dumb as the people who voted for Obama.
agalloch07 1 month ago
wow I never heared this speech before.....it actually brought a tear to my eye.. He is getting my vote in nov!!
cfpkiller77 1 month ago
@LAFD54 So basically what you're saying is that you're for helplessness? Here's some justification for you: How about your mother is robbed and carjacked, or your wife is robbed and raped? You're saying they would not be justified in carrying a gun? If you are against owning and carrying a firearm, then you are FOR stripping law abiding citizens of their God given right to self-defense.
cphogan88 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Everyone needs to be anti-gun! If you want a gun, join the army idiot. What we don't need are untrained, trigger happy civilians out there just waiting to use a gun during a violent conflict. If you morons want to carry a gun, join the police or armed forces. You see how effective carry a firearms is, violent crime is at an all time high. Civilians have NO justification for carrying any firearms. All this does is strokes their egos and makes them WANT to get involved in violent confrontations.
LAFD54 1 month ago
His speech makes me proud of American spirit.
greenlego42 1 month ago
Newt Gingrich 2012!
man11withaplan 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Tyrants from Hitler to Mao to Stalin have sought to disarm their own citizens, for the simple reason that unarmed people are easier to control.
Our Founders, having just expelled the British army, knew that the right to bear arms serves as the guardian of every other right."
- Ron Paul
officialusa 2 months ago
@officialusa You attributed that sentiment to Ron Paul? Those words are not unique to Ron Paul. Those are the words of every pro gun commentator who knows his history.
genemz5 1 month ago
Newt's got my vote!
Bostinlagga 2 months ago
WE THE PEOPLE,HE JUST GOT MY VOTE.
TheLanonna 2 months ago
Newt is a great american I wish more in washington were like him.The more the media
critisize him the more you can trust him. They fear him.
farahnet1 2 months ago
@iMovieRox I was a member of CRF, too. And, I volunteered over 500 hours for Ronald Reagan. I was taught that you should always know what your opponents are saying so that you can muster information to rebut them...
cafoyles 2 months ago
We're gonne need em if he's in charge. Because once he closes all foreign US military bases, and pulls every troop back into the 50 States, the rest of the world is gonna go to shit. We're all going to need as many guns as we can possible to keep ourselves safe as the rest of the neighborhood goes to shit!
Great foreign policy strategy.
EchoMike03 2 months ago
He just got my vote. Newt is an amazing speaker but I want to point out one thing that is not very well known. He is good friends with William Fortschen, author of One Second After and he is a supporter of EMP awareness. As a matter of fact he even wrote the forward for One Second After. In this very speech Newt mentioned him as Bill Fortschen. If your a gun rights supporter and or prepper then Newt should be your candidate. Please don't just youtube his vids next November. GET OUT AND VOTE!
carolinaridgerat 2 months ago
@carolinaridgerat -- Just thought you should know that Ron Paul is a firm supporter of the right to carry and own firearms. This audio clip makes that quite clear. I just thought you would be interested to know if this is an important issue for you:
/watch?v=OpWzZgTrUO8
R3v01utI0n1776 2 months ago
Why does Obama have to be there if Newt campaigning for him!
walterconkrite 2 months ago
Do your research. Newt was horrible for the 2nd Amendment when he was Speaker of the House. He is a disgrace.
pattymcpatterstud1 2 months ago 3
@pattymcpatterstud1 A disgrace? "I'm very much in favor of stopping people who engage in violence against their spouses from having guns. I think that's a very reasonable position." That is a disgrace? Its a position that some see as a necessity. And, its wrong to do background checks so that felons can not buy a gun? Patty? Why did you tell us to do our research? Figured we would not?
genemz5 1 month ago
@genemz5 “As long as I am Speaker of this House, no gun control legislation is going to move in committee or on the floor of this House and there will be no further erosion of their rights.” Voted for "gun free zones act" that contained the Lautenberg gun ban, which lowered the threshold for losing one’s Second Amendment rights to a mere misdemeanor. He even refused to cosponsor a repeal of the assault weapons ban during the next Congress...etc. Actions speak louder than words, my friend.
pattymcpatterstud1 1 month ago
@genemz5 Actually look what was in that Bill and not his response to it. The "violent crime against spouses" was to get people on board with the Bill. Misdemeanors at home could be considered "domestic violence."
pattymcpatterstud1 1 month ago
@pattymcpatterstud1 Violent crimes against spouses is a valid reason. JANUARY 20--A Wisconsin man charged with domestic abuse told cops that a “ghost” was actually responsible for injuries suffered by his wife, according to police. The victim told cops that West twice strangled her, and that he punched her in the face when she tried to dial 911. Just a misdemeanor... I see. Newt made no sense. Just a misdemeanor.
genemz5 1 month ago
@genemz5 This ONE case should have been a felony. That crime was no misdemeanor. Felons are prohibited in purchasing firearms...that is fine. In that particular case the problem lies with the charge. If Newt was so great for the Second Amendment, why didn't he repeal the assault weapons ban? He controlled the majority of the House.
pattymcpatterstud1 1 month ago
@pattymcpatterstud1 because in order to repeal you must also control heavily the Senate and the Presidency.....just my .02
kylem977 1 month ago
@kylem977 The 105th Congress had 55/100 Republican Senators, 227/435 Republican Congressmen. There are also many pro second amendment Democrats in the south and midwest. He had plenty of people that could have been on board with a repeal but did not even try.
pattymcpatterstud1 1 month ago
@pattymcpatterstud1 So Mr.patty-when do you think Obama and his administration will be giving a speech about the second amendment that we will enjoy?hmmm.
hpmacmurray 1 month ago
@hpmacmurray Never. What's your point?
pattymcpatterstud1 1 month ago
@pattymcpatterstud1 People can change their views, on guns etc look at Rudy Gulliani He did.?
COYOTE165A 1 month ago
@COYOTE165A If you want to support one who flip flops rather than someone who actually believes with conviction our 2nd Amendment Rights, then support Newt. I would never support someone who voted for the Department of Education, voted for the Fairness Doctrine, who likens himself with Teddy Roosevelt, and who is apart of the UN-Loving and anti sovereignty group Council on Foreign Relations. I would head caution for anyone supporting a Neo Con who will appoint the next Supreme Court Judge.
pattymcpatterstud1 1 month ago
5***** 4 Newt!
dowopper51 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@dowopper51 2012 Presidential Candidates - Gun Owners Of America
Ron Paul A+
Rick Perry A
Michelle Bachmann A
Rick Santorum B-
Newt Gingrich C
Mitt Romney D-
vechorik 2 months ago
A great history lesson here !
MrDrBackJack 5 months ago
National Public Radio is already working for the GOP's campaign
using broadcasting tax payer funds and donor's funds
overt theft and crime is the republican way
as oppossed to the more subtle kind of their fellow serfs for the wealthy, Democrats
sonbarably 8 months ago
what can weapons possibly do for those who don't know their enemy?
catch up to technology
it will protect the wealthy no matter what crimes they bring upon you
assault weapons or not, the stupid and those without advanced technology, are powerless
sonbarably 8 months ago
I'm a long-time fan of Newt's, but I don't think the average American will be down for a smart argument. I think the average Joe or Jane needs something less intellectual and more gut-instinct. Or, more probably, something totally wishy-washy like Romney. It's annoying to someone of my thinking, but hey, what can you do?
mstrhck 9 months ago
Newwwwwwwwt!
mstrhck 9 months ago
Newt landslide 2012
Zendout1 9 months ago
us libertarians will eat you out of touch conservatives soon....i hate it when i tell people im against obamacare and support the second ammendement that people think im a war mongering homophobe like newt
mike420rvd 9 months ago
@mike420rvd I'm worried! After all the Presidential elections we've had, the libertarians have won none. I'm shakin' in me boots, dummy!
mstrhck 9 months ago
@mstrhck yes shake in your boots remember we went from close to zero libertarian republicans in 2007 to many and were on the rise please shake in your boots
mike420rvd 8 months ago
The NRA (National Retard Association) resembles a Terrorist Group that should be stopped.
FYI: I do believe in the right to bear arms but with the intelligence of gun control.
DMiyash248 9 months ago
It will be a nice values tour. lol The evil republicans have given up another year to the stupid democrats. Nobody is electable on the republican side. What.. Newt with pick your bimbo (Palin. or if thats not stupid enogh. Bachman). Romney believes in that the "son of god" was in the americas. Huckabee was the only threat and he likes his show. Ron Paul is the only sane one in the bunch, but even he is nuts in areas. Rednecks will get behind anyone that they think can beat the "articulate" guy.
TheBeardedMarxist 9 months ago
Never really heard Gingrich speak before. I just received this link.
He talks a lot of sense, is obviously well learned, knows his history & facts.
I'm looking forward to seeing him run in 2012.
flywheel702 9 months ago 7
@flywheel702 Actually he's a huge hypocrite and will take away your 2nd amendment right in a heartbeat. He is ranked at the bottom for gun owner rights. You tube RON PAUL if you like our constitution.
huntingtonbeachify 1 month ago
@flywheel702 RON PAUL 2012! better check newt's record and integrity or lack of.
combatmma1 1 month ago
2 democrats visited this page...lol... See you in 2012, Newt :)
DarkNewEngland 9 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
What a scumbag. FU Newt!
51516 9 months ago
Newt will never ever be President. Regardless of how thrilling ?? is speeches are, the general public has never forgiven him for the cancer scandal involving his wife, nor his cheating on women ways. The only way Newt might have a chance is by finding and killing the 2 man behind Osama Bin Laden.
newbeginxyz 9 months ago
You rock, Newt!
Cantrellinator 9 months ago
Most Liberals can speechify... Newts are slimy chameleons. Like any politician, don’t listen to what they say, wacht what they do… Study history. Newt is a dangerous man… You are Warned…
mainbearing68 10 months ago
Yes he is dangerous to those who hate this country,those who hate the God of our fathers, and those who hate the historic basis of this nation.God bless him.
video951 10 months ago
@video951 Putting aside his duplicity, his political prolix and his RECORD (don‘t forget his history of liberal tendencies), He speaks big words of conservatism. But when his words are put to the test, his actions should speak louder than his words. I am not saying he is a bad man. Just that we should remove the blinders and take in the whole picture. Then carefully choose who we support with the full knowledge they all say what ever the political climate dictates in order to get elected.
mainbearing68 10 months ago
Great speech.
glynn72 10 months ago
I heart Newt. GREAT SPEECH. I never thought of what he said about the right for us to bear arms ALREADY existed, before the Constitution was written. Newt is brilliant.
cpmower 10 months ago
A very good speech
hugo2x 10 months ago 2
What a great speech. Well done Newt
nik416 10 months ago 2
This is just Awsome.
Iam4armalitem15 10 months ago