A potent and inspiring set of observations and critiques as usual, Mr. Whittle. I can't tell you how encouraging it is to find someone who 1) is in front of camera 2) has a brain and 3) speaks truth. Keep up the good work!
Does anybody else see it strange the he complains about others focusing on race but then makes a video about race.... This whole race thing never occurred to me. Perhaps people are still stuck in the 1960s.
god damn, this guy is a genius. Whittle, when you get big and you're offered your own prime time television show, please don't stray from hard hitting stuff like this just to fill time.
If someone had asked me about the acceptance of racist ideologies from minorities, I would have said that it has become commonplace. But even though I know that, hearing this video really drives it home. It has become so common that it's not even noticed. This is an important video for that reason.
@MrHappyniceboy said,"wake up you dumb assholes, racism towards ANY group is possible. whites are an ethnicity too. im sick of the double standard hypocrisy"
You obviously missed the point. Try listening next time and put away your preconceived ideas.
In regards to the firefighter's court case, it goes to show that liberals are concerned ONLY with revenge, rather than equality. Obama supports racism and is a craven liar.
In regards to the firefighter's court case, it goes to show that liberals are concerned ONLY with revenge, rather than equality. How f**king boneheaded can people be?
@robertmike57 how? when our new judge said she can do a better job because she is a Latina women, as apposed to a White man,( i paraphrased) how is what bill said Racist?
STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!
So, here's how it works - every time that Bill Whittle is called a racist, it just proves that the one calling him racist is racist! The old "rubber and glue" rebuttal! A classic!
@pureevilfnord I'm too lazy to look for the comment that I had to reply specifically. The statistics I used for my likelihood of being raped are in the statistics database of the Department of Justice and I weighed the population groups with the results of the census. I'm sure even a little boy like you can look them up. :)
@delyshBB If you make a ridiculous or outrageous claim, the burden is on YOU to back it up. That being said, I have found MUCH info to debunk your claim. Here is an article that shows how the statistics are manipulated and misrepresented. Just turn the DOTs into real dots and you can read it yourself.
I find it funny how the poster at 4:42 says "Are land" land instead of "Our Land"....unless that was intentional....it really shows how smart the creator of the poster that the Supreme Court Justice supported is
Cry me a river, white boy. Aren't we a little sick of healthy, wealthy and smug middle aged white guys griping about being racially oppressed? All of his "compelling evidence" that Soytomeyer was "racist" was debunked almost instantly. He's not going to bother to check that out or follow up with a retraction is he?
You can almost hear the collective whimper of thousands of white guy's pee pees when they realize the world isn't all theirs any more.
Some of the stuff on here is correct and sometimes they do go over the line. But if one looks at how minorities were treated (especially blacks) they would see why there is some of the stuff in place today. Even today many minorities (especially blacks) face lots of discrimination mainly from conservative bosses.
@TheCaliCapitalist Your statement that minorities face discrimination from conservative bosses is pile a excrement a mile high. Not only is there absolutely zero evidence to back up this ludicrous claim, but in reality it is in fact the left who has proven time and time and time again that they draw the lines of race.
the cheesy mainstream media narrative that conservatives are racist doesnt hold water, at all.
And BTW, nothing in the vid goes over the line. The truth hurts eh?
I tried typing in "Bill Whittle is an idiot" on Google, since I do that for all people who seem important. Guess what? There were no hits. Nothing even remotely close.
Pajamasmedia is my favorite Political Youtube Channel. And its due most to Bill Whittle
@superlucci He's not dumb, just full of shit. I use his videos to teach high school students how to use the "fallacies of argument". Run a Google search on that and then watch your Bill Whittle videos. We timed him, he averages a fallacy every 30 seconds.
You honestly think that your portrayal of this to university students is a legitimate way of disproving the obvious truth to the statements we’ve just reviewed? No it’s not, in fact quite the contrary. Today’s education system is polluted with liberal agendas, as the left tend to prey on the oblivious and easily persuaded. A professor presents something as indisputable truth, and students eat it up. It’s tragic.
@Goldenglimmer I don't "pass off things as truth" to my students. I break them into two groups, one to prove the thesis , one to disprove it. The students are graded on their correct usage of the fallacies of argument. We have done this with videos by Whittle, Beck, Limbaugh, Jon Stewart, Michael Moore and Al Gore and many people in between. When you talk "Liberal bias" in schools, it just tells me that you get your info from TV and radio pundits and have no real experience in the school system.
I have to say that I find that hard to believe, being that the nature of your previous comments has been solely to undermine the conservative side of the political spectrum. You can't suddenly claim to be a neutral, objective teacher whose only intent is to give his students an objective and critical view of the system in itself, because you are obviously affected by your personal views and opinions, as demonstrated in prior statements made by you.
Also, I'd like to point out that there is no need for me to microanalyze your comments to realize where you stand. Your listing of subjects whom you say you've used as examples is proof alone. I'm assuming these are listed by the amount of virulence you add to the mix when you portray them, i.e “Whittle, Beck and Limbaugh = fallacy demons from rightwing hell” and “Stewart, Moore and Gore = mildly inaccurate at times”.
@superlucci Try typing in "Bill Whittle Liar", you'll get a shitload of hits then! He's a schoolyard bully dressed up in an expensive suit and given Dale Carnegie speech lessons.
He won't do that, because PJTV makes a big point out of displaying only and ONLY factually correct material, unlike the MSM. Pureevil spouts off his vile, petty "opinions" in a haze of juvenile rage, because he realizes that the very fundaments in the illusion of "the problems of modern racism" (a major liberal playing card) is being challenged by a man dedicated to distributing the missing facts to the American people.
@pureevilfnord In case you're wondering, I looked that up on Youtube and Google.
0 responses on Youtube.
A mere 33,000 hits on Google.
And most of those Google hits were pages with all three words on them ,but separated. In summary, there exists no real rebuttal against him.
If he's so lousy, you make a video and explain what he is saying that's wrong. Until then, I will assume you're a cook, and I feel sorry for your students.
This is one of the main reasons I don't have "white guilt." I won't be played. And, I for one, have stopped defending myself against charges of "racism." When people call me a racist, they are just wrong. But that's nothing new --- people being wrong.
@vuduhaiku My question is, how many times do you get accused of racism? I'm not politically correct AT ALL and I've NEVER had to defend myself for being racist.
@pureevilfnord Not much. Mostly by ignorant people who want to end arguments quickly. Playing the race card generally ends arguments. Not with me. It's nice you've never had to defend yourself. That's nice. Good for you.
"Just because there are racist laws and actions in effect that advance further races that whites do not benefit from doesn't suddenly mean they have it "tough"."
You have yet to frame a logical argument that proves this is "racist"
"Oh yeah, and my most initial reply to you already touched on how inner city "minorities" refer to whites as honkeys, crackers, etc. "
Point? racial slurs by idiots have nothing to do with affirmative action. yes there are black and white idiots.
@hipstermi Don't you see? In the old days you could talk shit about the differn't color folks and nobody would say nothin', but now that them things are all politically correct, people frown on a white guy bitchin' about them niggers! That is racism, pure an simple. REAL simple. LOBOTOMY simple. INBRED simple.
It amazes me how stupid people refuse to 'get it'. It isn't about damage. Nobody suffers damage from modern 'racism'. It's about the stupidity of the racists, who are now almost entirely non-white. Just take a look at your local college's 'ethnic studies' classes, the vast majority of which vilify America in general and white people in particular.
"Just take a look at your local college's 'ethnic studies' classes, the vast majority of which vilify America in general and white people in particular. "
Can I ask where you are getting this info from or by what criteria you judge? I highly doubt you took the time to look over the 3,000 plus colleges in the nation, course content, and come to such a conclusion.
And no, you citing 1 or 2 courses you may have experiences in your 4-6 years of college is not a broad study.
I honestly do not believe white guys have it so tough these days like Whittle Bill, Rush, Beck, and others claim. Funny how these guys only seem able to see "reverse" racism.
@brainiacgames LOL FACEPALM. It's not my other account. Just because I know when someone is being fucked up doesn't mean I own the winning account. EPIC FAIL BITCH. And you can deny, deny, deny all you want, but the only one losing is hipstermi. LOL dumb bitch.
@hipstermi "I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character." vs affirmative action.
@hipstermi when you make silly statements like "white guys dont have it so tough" and i bring up affirmative action and you dodge by saying your not talking about affirmative action...i didn ask you if you were for it or against it......Ricci v. DeStefano...
"So you segue instead of addressing the hypocrisy and become intolerant of the actions of both?"
Honestly...the way Wright's sermon's have been cherry picked and spliced I dont feel we have enough data. I judge Obama on his own actions. I do note conservative news, talk shows, and commentators do seem to have a "problem" with blacks in general and love to hype up that fear factor thing.
its always interesting to hear about how ethnic and racial groups like to live in and define their morals and behaviors by their ethnicity. there is one truly great rule of conduct and it does not take race, or nationality into consideration. treat others the way you want to be treated, so simple and pure and devoid of any improper motivation. to implement it however takes the greatest self control and the ability to look beyond our own self interests, and as such we dont see it in action much
@jonservo Its a good rule of thumb but it falls short when people have different needs. If someone wants freedom os speech and another one wants taboos they will implement different rules to eachother.
@Darvinisti ergo the reason it takes so much self control. it requires a person to actually look beyond what may be good for themselves, or seem to be good for themselves. our most basic needs as humans are universal and there is a big difference between needs and desires. the difference between treating another as you wish to be treated (for ex. with kindess and respect), and forcing your desires on others is to miss the point of this statement
Elitists have founded the planetary 2-tier system of caste that's being driven home now: the ludicrously wealthy and the abjectly impoverished; those who live in splendor and those who die in squalor; the privileged few verses the faceless, penurious masses. Who supports this scheme?
im not white but i feel sorry for white apologists. white guilt amongst liberals is so obvious it's embarrassing and patronizing to non-whites. mexicans and blacks take advantage of it, as for me, i look down on libs.
Why would a black (male) supremacist appoint a latino female supremacist into such a powerful position? Because he's not a black supremacist at all...and neither is she.
It's all a ruse, mostly to keep the masses in groups, so the NWO can play those groups against each other to better control them. White conservaitves are easily smacked down with racism (Ron/Rand Paul)...and non-white conservatives are laughed out of power (Condi Rice). Everyone else is in the NWO-approved, big gov party.
@TheGoalSetter It's not that a black supremecist nominated a latino supremecist, it's that an anti-white socialist with a hatred for the Consitution nomininated another anti-white socialist with a hatred for the constitution.
How is Obama "anti white"? Also, explain how he is a socialism with an actual definition because words have actual meanings. You seem to be parroting right wing talk show hosts.
"hatred for the Consitution"
I'm betting he can spell "Constitution" at least.
You conservatives do this a lot- anyone who doesn't follow conservative assholism "hates" the Constitution. You repeat your "talking points" well and offer no explanations to this BS.
@hipstermi I see you don't deny his hatred for the constitution, which is a relief, a rare point of honesty in leftist correspondence.
Anti-white: Obama sat in the church, listened to the sermons and befriended the man who said this "Until we make white folks hate their whiteness, we will never be free." Calling him 'mentor' and his 'spiritual advisor'
Socialism: Government control of the means of production, through taxation and regulation, rather than ownership ala 'communism'.
"I see you don't deny his hatred for the constitution, which is a relief, a rare point of honesty in leftist correspondence"
That's a conservative lie on your part.
I wrote" You conservatives do this a lot- anyone who doesn't follow conservative assholism "hates" the Constitution. You repeat your "talking points" well and offer no explanations to this BS."
You conservatives tend to lie a lot in these discussions.
"Anti-white: Obama sat in the church, listened to the sermons and befriended"
Golly gosh! You seem "scared" of black people so much! I don't see that any worse the rest of Christianity and it's various bigotry, violence, and hate.
@hipstermi mm-hmm, you own your car now, you own your house now...but the ethos of socialism is that you own nothing but what the government allows. Love the fact that socialism hasn't gotten its teeth in too deep just yet, deep enough to call your salary and property, even your family 'communal'. Why do you assist those with a corrupt, freedom-dissolving mindset gain ground in this nation?
@sanchtech I'm no Obama supporter, in fact I am almost openly pro tea party, but I think people need to lay off the Revd Wright thing. I totally trust Obama when he says that he never listened to his pastor, because Obama is really too smart to believe any kind of religious bullcrap. Obama may not be a nice person, but he is a heck of a brilliant guy. There's no way he actually listens to the crap that religious leaders come up with.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
bill whittle is another white-anglo-saxon-josef mengele-pat buchanan-ann coulter-tea party american racist without backbones & promoting white supremacy. Your time has been fulfilled you euro-billy graham- christian demons from the pit of hell. YHWH rules and is bringing judgement upon your g8-nations sponsored white american "jibberish" doctrine. Be Blessed, Peace & Shalom,
You are way too generous, Bill. The kind of rhetoric Obama dished out would definitely be called racist if it had been a caucasian writing those words. Exchanging black for white makes it obvious that Obama is racist.
"Oh, the good ole left in America - spitting on Dr. Martin Luther King's legacy daily!"
You do know King fought in the south...and despite a "Democrat" label was a CONSERVATIVE territory. You do know your southern red states still have a "problem" with race?
Then we can talk conservative bigotry towards gays.
sticking up for your own group first isn't racism. i mean, sure, the shit that wright spewed is racism because it's both prejudice and hate, but stating facts or prefering your group is normal, not racist. actually to me being called racist has no meaning anymore.
The danger is that you have to be very specific. I profile, but race plays no part in that. For example, if you dress like a gang banger, I will assume you are a gang banger and treat you as such. The color of your skin plays no part of this equation.
as a white woman, the odds are 20 times higher to be raped by a black man than a white man. race is a legitimate thing for me to profile on because of these facts. on the other hand, obviously that if i see a black man dressed in a suit, i will have a better reaction towards him than towards a white gang banger.
I was going to +1 this comment, but I felt it needed clarification first. BB helps illustrate my point. Profiling takes many forms, but race doesn't have to be a part of it. Notice how she says the man in the suit isn't as big a priority as the gang banger, even though the gang banger is white. This is the key part of profiling. Your actions and choices which you display are the things that must be targeted. If profiling is done in this manner, it is extremely effective.
@blkbltVette I'd have to argue with your comment about profiling.. there are many different levels and components to profiling, whether it's wrong or right is something i don't think I'll go into, but only focusing on how people act, is not nearly as helpful as you appear to think. When you are doing something that warents profiling, you normally change your behaviors to elude it. that's when other parameters come into play, added in with actions and behaviors, that's when profiling is effective
I am not blind to race. As Alfonzo Rachel said, I see skin color and respect the differences between others. However, unlike liberals, I don't get hung up on race as a reason for divisions to be created but instead embrace the differences that we have but choose to ignore them in light of becoming a one America where regardless of race, we are judged by both character and will, and that in our America, any race has the potential to achieve any level, and be congratulated for it.
@ShockwavePulsis but isn't it already? slavery has been abolished for a couple hundred years. and as much as any of these civil rights advocates want to argue it, there is a lack of racism in America. There are those "bad seeds" that wish to instigate the argument and keep it alive, many of whom are those that advocate against it. Because just like with politics Civil rights advocates jobs are to make sure they have jobs tomorrow, if they admit racism is going away they don't have a job.
@daPlumber702 Not particularly, we still continue to subdivide by introducing the concept of 'ethnicism' and 'diversity'. They're only terms that continue to divide. Why call someone African-American when they can just be called American? The culture of suppression if over, so why are we still bellyaching as a country over a problem that no longer exists? We can vett out individuals who continue to pursue racism, but even they are entitled to their own opinion. Not arguing against you.
@FiFiLaRue81 We "continue" to call someone an "African-American" because that someone DEMANDS that we call them "African-American" because Malcolm X taught him or her that "African-Americans" should NOT allow themselves to be called "Blacks", but instead they should demand to be called "Africans Who Happen to be in America" aka "African-Americans". So, FiFi, we don't call someone just an "American" as you request because, and only because, that someone does NOT WANT to be called an "American".
"because that someone DEMANDS that we call them "African-American" because Malcolm X taught him or her that "African-Americans" should NOT allow themselves to be called "Blacks","
You need to cite sources. You are making a incorrect statement here. MalcolmX had nothing to do with that. It wasn't he term "blacks" people protested...it was "negro".
"slavery has been abolished for a couple hundred years. and as much as any of these civil rights advocates want to argue it, there is a lack of racism in America."
???
So what in your Conservative fantasy, slavery went away right after Lincoln did? Guessing all those marches in the 50s-60 was for nothing.
"Civil rights advocates jobs are to make sure they have jobs "
You don't have to have a "job" to be an advocate, dumbass.
as for your first comment.. moron... I didn't say that slavery ended, I said it was abolished. I never said that in the 50's and 60's there weren't bigots and racists. I am saying that there are far less in america now then there have ever been, or are in most other countries. I am also saying that it is not advantagious in the slightest to be racist in america today.
Your second point is thrown in the trash by names like jesse jackson and al sharpton.
"Your second point is thrown in the trash by names like jesse jackson and al sharpton."
Not really. The point you failed to address or even articulate a resonable reply: "You don't have to have a "job" to be an advocate, dumbass." Lots of people are advocates against racism, or bigotry against gays, or any other group and it's not their "job".
The same holds true for Tea Party protesters...plenty have other jobs.
@delyshBB Please show me documentation that you are 20 times more likely to be raped by a black man. Where does this figure come from? I'm not saying you're a liar, but if you're going to make such a claim, you should really back it up.
@delyshBB STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!
So let me ask a question to those who are afraid of Racial Profiling . If you saw your family member being murdered by a black man and then you reported to the police are they not allowed to look at all black men that fits the description? Same thing with terrorists if they look suspicious that is not discrimination during Wartime after thousands were murdered
Would you rather feel offended if you were asked questions and then later on you heard a man caught ready to blow up an airplane it saved hundreds of lives. Everybody stop feeling sorry for yourselves this is wartime, sacrifice a little bit of yourself for others and stop thinking about yourself
To be precisely clear, here's a quote from the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998: "Nothing in this Act shall be construed to authorize or otherwise speak to the use of United States Armed Forces (except as provided in section 4(a)(2)) in carrying out this Act ."
Bill, that's why I am always most emphatic when criticizing Pres. Obama. I only direct my attacks against the 50% that comes from his mother's side. I am most careful not to say a single word against the 50% that is his father's side. Because I do not wish to be charged with Racism, I am most careful to limit my remarks to just 50%. We can call it "The Allowable 50%",
However, I find that speaking against his 100% Marism background is fair game.
Martin Luther King, Jr said "I have a dream that my four children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character, " and it's such a logical, reasonable thing that even a 5-yr old can grasp it -- and I speak from experience.
Just like with civil rights legislation, I'm waiting for the Left to stop filibustering (again) and grow up, and bring their race-bating extortionists (jackson/sharpton/et al) along with them.
Please explain why conservatives are claiming to follow that very motto and still support racial profiling at airports. Skin color doesn't matter right? (Btw I am not defending liberals. This message is coming from a non-partisan independant thinker)
I'd like to believe you're both independent and thinking however I find it difficult when you create a straw-man with the question; it's Apples, Oranges. And I reject the implication that it's a conservative principle. I should note I have some liberal acquaintances who are 'for it' and couldn't believe Bush didn't make it legal after 9/11.
If you want to discuss racial profiling, I'm happy to, and I can argue all three sides of the debate as well, and throw in some common sense as a bonus.
My own experience w/ racial profiling: I and others my color were once stopped by two cops of the opposite color for, basically, 'being the wrong color in that neighborhood.' They talked to us, told us what was up, we understood their problem, they saw we weren't trouble, they treated us w/ respect and apologized for troubling us. I saw two cops who cared about the neighborhood, and felt safer, frankly.
The post-9-11TSA rent-cops? I hate them passionately and feel less safe now when I fly.
Well i don't argue that it makes anyone less safe, but that doesnt make it right. It's like saying you care about excelling through school and getting a good job by lying and cheating. Racial Profiling is cheating the Constitution. Is it just too much to ask for a little bit of probable cause? I mean seriously.
I completely agree that there is a racism double standard, and that it's wrong that it's okay for a black/other person to say something but it's wrong for a white person to say the same thing.
I completely disagree with your republican views, however.
Rich Canadians go to America for healthcare. Poor Canadians wait for their turn. Rich Americans like their healthcare. Poor Americans just get worst off...
Indeed, the world's elites come to the US for treatment. Though, of all industrialized countries, America is the worst place to be if you're not in the elite or at least rich enough to pay for the most expensive healthcare of the world...
FoucheSC Now I might start the debate with you, and point out some things BUT, sonsidering that you are from Canada and live there, do us a favor and stop trying to debate our politics, its honeslty none of your business!
Yeah right! America is the best place to be for treatment. I guess you haven't been around. Even those without health insurance of any kind get treatment. They just get a bill at the end of there stay as well which most of them don't end up paying and other end up paying for them in terms of higher fees. Kind of like a store that gets ripped off all the time they end up jacking up the prices to cover their loss. Not to mention government imposed fees and licenses.
Yeah, thanks Captain Obvious. Do me a favor, point out to me any product in the entire world that is the best product or service in its respective class/industry that is NOT the most expensive. C'mon man. That's like me saying, "yeah, the Honda Accord is a longer lasting and overall better car than a Kia Rio, but the Honda Accord costs more." DUH!!! But, by your logic, I guess the government should give everyone Honda Accords because its not fair if they drive Kia Rios. Wahhhhhhh! ;(
Oh yeah, one more big unfortunate fact for you that blows your point out of the water. UNLIKE CANADA, in the US ANYONE can walk into a hospital ANYWHERE in our country and they will receive the BEST healthcare treatment in the world IMMEDIATELY. Again, NO WHERE ELSE IN THE ENTIRE WORLD DOES THIS OCCUR. THIS FASTEST AND BEST MEDICAL TREATMENT IN THE ENTIRE WORLD. Of course its the most expensive, its the best by far, that's why. Does it need reform? Yes, but it IS THE BEST IN THE WORLD.
When I was 20 years old, I had no health insurance of any form. I had appendicitis & was rushed to the local hospital, my appendix was 2-4 hours from rupturing & I had no money in the bank & no insurance. Guess what, no one at the hospital asked me a single question about whether or not I could pay, whether I had insurance or whether I was a legal citizen. They put me on a gurney & 45 minutes later, I was in recovery after having my appendix removed. I would've died anywhere else in the world.
So how much does your life mean to you? Enough to suffer bankruptcy to save it or at least pay the cost even if it is significant? Enough to pay for your own insurance? Your life is your concern, you pay your own way. Nobody likes being made to pay for people they don't know and perhaps don't like.
She's hardly a moron. She well managed one of the largest import/export locations in the world. She well managed one of the largest military sites in the entire world. She very well managed one of the largest fish and wildlife land and water masses in the entire world.
In 2010, the party that will win will be based on who the special interests have the most faith in. That is, unless we as a nation force our leaders to audit the Fed and end corruption. McCain was too liberal, he ended it.
If you consider McCain a liberal, then you don't know what a liberal is, and you probably affiliate it with anyone that isn't a retarded neoconservative/theocrat.
Yes, she is a moron. When has she ever uttered anything intelligent? Alaska isn't one of the largest import/export regions in the world (doesn't even make any sense to begin with), and it isn't one of the largest military sites in the world. Managing wildlife? You should congratulate her on managing the moon's orbit too.
I don't consider McCain a liberal, he does. Go to the Huffington Post since you get your news from the far left and its quite clear, search "John McCain Accidentally Calls Himself A Liberal Republican". Go to US census site to see the import/export. Google search "Alaska's Military Importance" and there's tons of options to go read and confirm. The fisheries & wildlife are just as obvious & you look foolish to debate that. You should get a point & some facts or at least be relevant & accurate.
And McCain corrected himself. He doesn't have liberal policies. He may be socially liberal, but he's still a neoconservative.
Alaska does have military importance, but you claimed it's one of the largest military sites in the world, which is just so far from the truth. There are only 16,000 soldiers under Alaskan command, and most of that is the National Guard (Reservists/Militia).
You can't claim that she managed the wildlife well. It's wildlife for crying out loud, you can't "manage" it.
Just look at how significant it was for us during WW2, its HIGHLY significant. Your numbers ignore the air force bases and active military personel and that around 1/3 of Alaska's population is military, of course I'm sure that doesn't matter either. Of course you manage wild life, if you had a clue, you'd know that fishing, hunting, crabbing, etc are heavily and highly regulated by the government's wildlife services. You also blow off the massive amounts of food/game Alaska provides the WORLD.
Perhaps you'd prefer to debate something that more facts can be provided on? I'm not big on the he said/she said you're dancing down. Why don't we debate something else like ACORN, Van Jones, the 912 Project, Health Care Reform, our national debt, the Stimulus, Cap & Trade, or something else where fact, logic & history can be applied. You know, those darn things that can't be made into victims as the liberal doctrine/ideology loathes to be. Just let me know & I'll debunk whatever is incorrect.
ACORN has absolutely everything to do with scandal and immorality. Only an individual with no morality would tolerate evidence that across every office shown there is an orchestrated attempt to mask prostitution and child sexual slavery. An investigation is more than warranted. Van Jones did far more than just call Republicans assholes. His histroy incredibly radical and he's a convicted felon, a self-avowed communist and has multiple videos of him making highly unfounded racist allegations.
Glenn Beck has the gumption to expose corruption, he did it to Bush and now he's doing it with Obama. You clearly are a bandwagon jumper. If you're not, send me this compelling evidence of him being a moron and a racist. Didn't think so. No reason for Americans to be opposed to health care reform? Oh, so I guess the Gallup and Rasmussen polls showing that over 80% of Americans with health care don't want the government involved any more with their lives is irrelevant. Yeah, that makes sense.
Health Care Reform: No reason why Americans should be so opposed. The opposition comes from widespread disinformation caused by the Health Insurance companies themselves.
National Debt: Doesn't need to be discussed. Just don't stick another NeoConservative in office.
The Stimulus: So much of it was wasted, so much of it was unnecessary. Democrats and Republicans alike are tools to the special interest groups.
National debt doesn't need to be discussed? That's the dumbest thing you've said so far. Its the largest debt we've ever had and Obama quadrupled it in less than 6 months. He spent more money than all presidents and administrations COMBINED since the BEGINNING of our nation. If you think that's not relevant you're completely clueless. You're right on the Stimulus to this extent - it only looked out for special interests for both Republicans AND Democrats.
I think you're confusing debt with deficit. Debt isn't a big deal, deficit however is, and Obama has increased the deficit with all the trivial bailouts.
And no he has not spent more money than all the other presidents combined. National Debt has only increased by 1 trillion since Obama was in office. Bush increased the debt by 6 trillion.
A conservative that says that debt isn't a big deal. That statement is the antithesis of a conservative philosophy. You're either bogusly representing that you're a conservative or you're blatantly ignorant to what conservative means. You just don't present the truth. Go get some facts and relative data or we're done. I'm not going to debate someone that creates information out of thin air with no credibility or accuracy.
Once again, you don't seem to understand the different between debt and deficit. The US has a 13 trillion dollar debt, but has a few hundred billion in deficit. Debt isn't a big deal, as it can be managed over time. Deficit is much more important than debt.
Canada has a huge debt as well, but it does not have a deficit, and has a surplus of 12 billion.
I'm a Canadian conservative. I believe in peoples individual rights, and I believe in fiscal responsibility.
Don't tell me I don't understand. The deficit is the difference between the money Government takes in, called receipts, and what the Government spends, called outlays, each year. Receipts include the money the Government takes in from income, excise and social insurance taxes as well as fees and other income. Outlays include all Federal spending including social security and Medicare benefits along with all other spending ranging from medical research to interest payments on the debt.
When there is a deficit, Treasury must borrow money needed for the government to pay its bills. We borrow the money by selling Treasury securities like T-bills, notes, Treasury Inflation-Protected securities & savings bonds to the public. Additionally, the Government Trust Funds are required by law to invest accumulated surpluses in Treasury securities. The Treasury securities issued to the public & to the Government Trust Funds (intragovernmental holdings) then become part of the total debt.
One way to think about the debt is as accumulated deficits. For information concerning the deficit, visit the Financial Management Service website to view the Monthly Treasury Statement of Receipts and Outlays of the United States Government. You can read more on this topic in the Federal Borrowing and Debt chapter of the Analytical Perspectives volume of the most recent budget. Tell me again if I don't know the difference between debt and deficit or if its you who is again sorely mistaken.
Are you trying to say public debt? Even then, you're not making any sense. And I looked at that website, couldn't find anything. Please provide a link to the exact page.
You can't put links up on here, you know that or I'd at least hope you know that. My description is entirely accurate. If you knew anything about economics you would've defaulted quite some time ago whether we were taling macro or micro economics. You clearly do not understand our government's economic policies. I can only assume, but won't state as a bold fact like you, that you're Canadian. I'd love to know if you're Canadian or not as that would explain a great deal if you are.
Yes you can post links. They won't be hot linked, but I can still copy and paste them into my url bar (if you ever decide to provide the links).
I've studied macroeconomics, so I know something about economics. I know a lot about your government, and I obviously know more about it than you do.
I've told you I'm a Canadian, I've told you I'm a member of the Conservative Party of Canada. It says on my profile that I live in Canada. Why are you only now just starting to think I'm a Canadian?
Yes, you're the highly exhaulted Canadian that knows more than I about my own government. I'm sure you know more about my state too. You've also posted no links as you cannot post links so just keep lying it amuses me much like some three stooges slap schtick comedy. If you do not know how to copy and paste into Google what I've typed and you wish to challenge, then there's really no hope for you. Just keep demanding you're right without proff.
Since you're emphatically denying reality, I've taken the time to type this out ONE MORE TIME so that folks chuckling at your banter and disinformation can see that you've been even futher rebuked and debunked. Go to Google, type "Financial Management Service. A Bureau of the United States Department of Treasury" you'll see all of my comments are accurate & specifically inline with our economic structures, policies and their respective definitions. Get over it, you're wrong. Go "bark" elsewhere!
Jesus fucking christ, I did, and I did go to the site. I can't find what you're talking about, that's why I asked you to please provide a link. And what disinformation? I've provided links/sources. You have not provided any links/sources. You are not making any sense. You're acting like a child. You're such a typical Republican.
If you want me to take you seriously, then quit acting like a child, and provide some links. Stop deflecting.
vortex - a powerful circular current of water (usually the result of conflicting tides)
sweethotcandy29 2 weeks ago
BOOM headshot!
trottheblackdog 3 weeks ago
fuck that nigger Obama. He's a treasonous illegal president who belongs in prison
tseitz123 3 weeks ago
@tseitz123 I'm not sure you entirely understand the point of this video.
Lazyguy22 14 hours ago
A potent and inspiring set of observations and critiques as usual, Mr. Whittle. I can't tell you how encouraging it is to find someone who 1) is in front of camera 2) has a brain and 3) speaks truth. Keep up the good work!
hatchk01 1 month ago
Does anybody else see it strange the he complains about others focusing on race but then makes a video about race.... This whole race thing never occurred to me. Perhaps people are still stuck in the 1960s.
scrubrug 1 month ago
This is purely genius.. People do have a double standard
JDPKRevolution 3 months ago 2
god damn, this guy is a genius. Whittle, when you get big and you're offered your own prime time television show, please don't stray from hard hitting stuff like this just to fill time.
imnotdavidxnsx 3 months ago 6
If someone had asked me about the acceptance of racist ideologies from minorities, I would have said that it has become commonplace. But even though I know that, hearing this video really drives it home. It has become so common that it's not even noticed. This is an important video for that reason.
koyunbaba73 3 months ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrHappyniceboy said,"wake up you dumb assholes, racism towards ANY group is possible. whites are an ethnicity too. im sick of the double standard hypocrisy"
You obviously missed the point. Try listening next time and put away your preconceived ideas.
JaxAttack2011 4 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Racists whites like the trash Pajamas Media attracts are always are on the lookout for black racism to justify their own racism.
DawnOfTheDead991 6 months ago
Comment removed
SergeantLuke 8 months ago
In regards to the firefighter's court case, it goes to show that liberals are concerned ONLY with revenge, rather than equality. Obama supports racism and is a craven liar.
muzzster1970 9 months ago 13
In regards to the firefighter's court case, it goes to show that liberals are concerned ONLY with revenge, rather than equality. How f**king boneheaded can people be?
muzzster1970 9 months ago
@shadowgeyser Racism against whites is nothing new. Whites were for example enslaved by muslims centuaries ago.
tobleronasahliv 10 months ago
Comment removed
robertmike57 11 months ago
@robertmike57 how? when our new judge said she can do a better job because she is a Latina women, as apposed to a White man,( i paraphrased) how is what bill said Racist?
maximunoutlaw32 10 months ago 4
@robertmike57
"quote mining" and "pack of lies"
Translation: The crime committed by conservatives when they fight dirty by using the unfair tactic of REPORTING WHAT LIBERALS ACTUALLY SAY.
UncleIrv 8 months ago 22
This has been flagged as spam show
STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!
np001 11 months ago
So, here's how it works - every time that Bill Whittle is called a racist, it just proves that the one calling him racist is racist! The old "rubber and glue" rebuttal! A classic!
pureevilfnord 11 months ago
@pureevilfnord I'm too lazy to look for the comment that I had to reply specifically. The statistics I used for my likelihood of being raped are in the statistics database of the Department of Justice and I weighed the population groups with the results of the census. I'm sure even a little boy like you can look them up. :)
delyshBB 11 months ago
@delyshBB If you make a ridiculous or outrageous claim, the burden is on YOU to back it up. That being said, I have found MUCH info to debunk your claim. Here is an article that shows how the statistics are manipulated and misrepresented. Just turn the DOTs into real dots and you can read it yourself.
robertlindsayDOTwordpressDOTcom/2009/03/02/more-on-the-black-man-white-women-so-called-rape-epidemic
pureevilfnord 11 months ago
I find it funny how the poster at 4:42 says "Are land" land instead of "Our Land"....unless that was intentional....it really shows how smart the creator of the poster that the Supreme Court Justice supported is
superlucci 11 months ago
Cry me a river, white boy. Aren't we a little sick of healthy, wealthy and smug middle aged white guys griping about being racially oppressed? All of his "compelling evidence" that Soytomeyer was "racist" was debunked almost instantly. He's not going to bother to check that out or follow up with a retraction is he?
You can almost hear the collective whimper of thousands of white guy's pee pees when they realize the world isn't all theirs any more.
pureevilfnord 11 months ago
Some of the stuff on here is correct and sometimes they do go over the line. But if one looks at how minorities were treated (especially blacks) they would see why there is some of the stuff in place today. Even today many minorities (especially blacks) face lots of discrimination mainly from conservative bosses.
TheCaliCapitalist 11 months ago
@TheCaliCapitalist Your statement that minorities face discrimination from conservative bosses is pile a excrement a mile high. Not only is there absolutely zero evidence to back up this ludicrous claim, but in reality it is in fact the left who has proven time and time and time again that they draw the lines of race.
the cheesy mainstream media narrative that conservatives are racist doesnt hold water, at all.
And BTW, nothing in the vid goes over the line. The truth hurts eh?
VegasBilgeRat 11 months ago
Uh- greed
rockinandout 11 months ago
I tried typing in "Bill Whittle is an idiot" on Google, since I do that for all people who seem important. Guess what? There were no hits. Nothing even remotely close.
Pajamasmedia is my favorite Political Youtube Channel. And its due most to Bill Whittle
superlucci 11 months ago 2
@superlucci He's not dumb, just full of shit. I use his videos to teach high school students how to use the "fallacies of argument". Run a Google search on that and then watch your Bill Whittle videos. We timed him, he averages a fallacy every 30 seconds.
pureevilfnord 11 months ago
@pureevilfnord
You honestly think that your portrayal of this to university students is a legitimate way of disproving the obvious truth to the statements we’ve just reviewed? No it’s not, in fact quite the contrary. Today’s education system is polluted with liberal agendas, as the left tend to prey on the oblivious and easily persuaded. A professor presents something as indisputable truth, and students eat it up. It’s tragic.
Goldenglimmer 11 months ago
@Goldenglimmer I don't "pass off things as truth" to my students. I break them into two groups, one to prove the thesis , one to disprove it. The students are graded on their correct usage of the fallacies of argument. We have done this with videos by Whittle, Beck, Limbaugh, Jon Stewart, Michael Moore and Al Gore and many people in between. When you talk "Liberal bias" in schools, it just tells me that you get your info from TV and radio pundits and have no real experience in the school system.
pureevilfnord 11 months ago
@pureevilfnord
I have to say that I find that hard to believe, being that the nature of your previous comments has been solely to undermine the conservative side of the political spectrum. You can't suddenly claim to be a neutral, objective teacher whose only intent is to give his students an objective and critical view of the system in itself, because you are obviously affected by your personal views and opinions, as demonstrated in prior statements made by you.
Goldenglimmer 11 months ago
@pureevilfnord
Also, I'd like to point out that there is no need for me to microanalyze your comments to realize where you stand. Your listing of subjects whom you say you've used as examples is proof alone. I'm assuming these are listed by the amount of virulence you add to the mix when you portray them, i.e “Whittle, Beck and Limbaugh = fallacy demons from rightwing hell” and “Stewart, Moore and Gore = mildly inaccurate at times”.
Goldenglimmer 11 months ago
@superlucci Try typing in "Bill Whittle Liar", you'll get a shitload of hits then! He's a schoolyard bully dressed up in an expensive suit and given Dale Carnegie speech lessons.
pureevilfnord 11 months ago
@pureevilfnord Refute something he says, and dont label anything with fallacies. Just say why its wrong
superlucci 11 months ago
@superlucci Oh, ok.
pureevilfnord 11 months ago
@superlucci
He won't do that, because PJTV makes a big point out of displaying only and ONLY factually correct material, unlike the MSM. Pureevil spouts off his vile, petty "opinions" in a haze of juvenile rage, because he realizes that the very fundaments in the illusion of "the problems of modern racism" (a major liberal playing card) is being challenged by a man dedicated to distributing the missing facts to the American people.
Goldenglimmer 11 months ago
@pureevilfnord In case you're wondering, I looked that up on Youtube and Google.
0 responses on Youtube.
A mere 33,000 hits on Google.
And most of those Google hits were pages with all three words on them ,but separated. In summary, there exists no real rebuttal against him.
If he's so lousy, you make a video and explain what he is saying that's wrong. Until then, I will assume you're a cook, and I feel sorry for your students.
shamgar001 11 months ago 3
O_O.................
ras144 1 year ago
This is one of the main reasons I don't have "white guilt." I won't be played. And, I for one, have stopped defending myself against charges of "racism." When people call me a racist, they are just wrong. But that's nothing new --- people being wrong.
vuduhaiku 1 year ago
@vuduhaiku My question is, how many times do you get accused of racism? I'm not politically correct AT ALL and I've NEVER had to defend myself for being racist.
pureevilfnord 11 months ago
@pureevilfnord Not much. Mostly by ignorant people who want to end arguments quickly. Playing the race card generally ends arguments. Not with me. It's nice you've never had to defend yourself. That's nice. Good for you.
vuduhaiku 11 months ago
THIS GUY IS BRILLIANT, THIS IS SOME REALLY AWESOME MEDIA!!!
roobadoob1984 1 year ago
@shadowgeyser
"it selects and advances a particular group over another. Your selective egalitarianism fails."
Your conservative bullshit fails.
"Go back and read my initial post that dealt with racial slurs."
I did...it made no sense in a discussion about affirmative action.
Really...middle aged white guys like Wittle really don't have it tough in American.
hipstermi 1 year ago
@shadowgeyser
"Just because there are racist laws and actions in effect that advance further races that whites do not benefit from doesn't suddenly mean they have it "tough"."
You have yet to frame a logical argument that proves this is "racist"
"Oh yeah, and my most initial reply to you already touched on how inner city "minorities" refer to whites as honkeys, crackers, etc. "
Point? racial slurs by idiots have nothing to do with affirmative action. yes there are black and white idiots.
hipstermi 1 year ago
@shadowgeyser
"Finally a white guy with the balls to actually say that whites are being taken advantage of"
????
You actually think white guys have it so tough in America these days?
I mean really?
"Other races are still suffering from racism, but whites are starting to now, too"
Hmmm...do you mean whites or conservative whites?
And how are they starting to "suffer" now?
hipstermi 1 year ago
@hipstermi Don't you see? In the old days you could talk shit about the differn't color folks and nobody would say nothin', but now that them things are all politically correct, people frown on a white guy bitchin' about them niggers! That is racism, pure an simple. REAL simple. LOBOTOMY simple. INBRED simple.
pureevilfnord 11 months ago
It amazes me how stupid people refuse to 'get it'. It isn't about damage. Nobody suffers damage from modern 'racism'. It's about the stupidity of the racists, who are now almost entirely non-white. Just take a look at your local college's 'ethnic studies' classes, the vast majority of which vilify America in general and white people in particular.
brainiacgames 1 year ago
@brainiacgames
"Just take a look at your local college's 'ethnic studies' classes, the vast majority of which vilify America in general and white people in particular. "
Can I ask where you are getting this info from or by what criteria you judge? I highly doubt you took the time to look over the 3,000 plus colleges in the nation, course content, and come to such a conclusion.
And no, you citing 1 or 2 courses you may have experiences in your 4-6 years of college is not a broad study.
hipstermi 1 year ago
@shadowgeyser
But jut so we're clear...
I honestly do not believe white guys have it so tough these days like Whittle Bill, Rush, Beck, and others claim. Funny how these guys only seem able to see "reverse" racism.
hipstermi 1 year ago
@hipstermi Wow, shadowgeyser is absolutely fucking DESTROYING you. LOL fail.
itachi705 1 year ago
@itachi705 Your other account is actually losing, dude. FACEPALM!
brainiacgames 1 year ago
@brainiacgames LOL FACEPALM. It's not my other account. Just because I know when someone is being fucked up doesn't mean I own the winning account. EPIC FAIL BITCH. And you can deny, deny, deny all you want, but the only one losing is hipstermi. LOL dumb bitch.
itachi705 1 year ago
@hipstermi "I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character." vs affirmative action.
thebackbencher666 1 year ago
@thebackbencher666
Odd how I did not argue for or against affirmative action.
Still, you failed to articulate any point or reasonable argument, just a conservative "talking point."
Really...white guys in American don't have it so tough.
hipstermi 1 year ago
@hipstermi when you make silly statements like "white guys dont have it so tough" and i bring up affirmative action and you dodge by saying your not talking about affirmative action...i didn ask you if you were for it or against it......Ricci v. DeStefano...
thebackbencher666 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@shadowgeyser
"So you segue instead of addressing the hypocrisy and become intolerant of the actions of both?"
Honestly...the way Wright's sermon's have been cherry picked and spliced I dont feel we have enough data. I judge Obama on his own actions. I do note conservative news, talk shows, and commentators do seem to have a "problem" with blacks in general and love to hype up that fear factor thing.
hipstermi 1 year ago
@shadowgeyser
"How about whites implement an "affirmative action"? Or NAAWP?"
Not trying to be snarky...but I don't understand your point here.
"how about blacks calling whites "crackers, honkeys" &c. Let's see, those are racial terms, used in a deragatory manner, hence racist"
Agreed. Why did you think I wouldn't?
"But there's only bigotry n regards to marriage."
Does this mean you agree opposing gay marriage is bigotry? Again, no snark on that question, just clarification.
hipstermi 1 year ago
@shadowgeyser
"Finally a white guy with the balls to actually say that whites are being taken advantage "
You mean another crybaby conservative who thinks white people have it so rough.
"suffering from racism, but whites are starting to now, too"
Explain how.
It's funny to hear you guys complain about this stuff and see conservative bigotry towards gays.
hipstermi 1 year ago
its always interesting to hear about how ethnic and racial groups like to live in and define their morals and behaviors by their ethnicity. there is one truly great rule of conduct and it does not take race, or nationality into consideration. treat others the way you want to be treated, so simple and pure and devoid of any improper motivation. to implement it however takes the greatest self control and the ability to look beyond our own self interests, and as such we dont see it in action much
jonservo 1 year ago
@jonservo Its a good rule of thumb but it falls short when people have different needs. If someone wants freedom os speech and another one wants taboos they will implement different rules to eachother.
Darvinisti 1 year ago
@Darvinisti ergo the reason it takes so much self control. it requires a person to actually look beyond what may be good for themselves, or seem to be good for themselves. our most basic needs as humans are universal and there is a big difference between needs and desires. the difference between treating another as you wish to be treated (for ex. with kindess and respect), and forcing your desires on others is to miss the point of this statement
jonservo 1 year ago
Elitists have founded the planetary 2-tier system of caste that's being driven home now: the ludicrously wealthy and the abjectly impoverished; those who live in splendor and those who die in squalor; the privileged few verses the faceless, penurious masses. Who supports this scheme?
AlongTheFarClimbDown 1 year ago
BTW, Sotomayor was not the first Hispanic Supreme Court justice. It was Benjamin Cordozo, descendant of Spanish Jews expelled from Spain in 1492.
zvi303 1 year ago
im not white but i feel sorry for white apologists. white guilt amongst liberals is so obvious it's embarrassing and patronizing to non-whites. mexicans and blacks take advantage of it, as for me, i look down on libs.
0186179821 1 year ago
we need to purge the filth that exists in the gov. by conversation and reason, that's the only way.
freezzertime 1 year ago 2
Why would a black (male) supremacist appoint a latino female supremacist into such a powerful position? Because he's not a black supremacist at all...and neither is she.
It's all a ruse, mostly to keep the masses in groups, so the NWO can play those groups against each other to better control them. White conservaitves are easily smacked down with racism (Ron/Rand Paul)...and non-white conservatives are laughed out of power (Condi Rice). Everyone else is in the NWO-approved, big gov party.
TheGoalSetter 1 year ago
@TheGoalSetter It's not that a black supremecist nominated a latino supremecist, it's that an anti-white socialist with a hatred for the Consitution nomininated another anti-white socialist with a hatred for the constitution.
Averyofthemain 1 year ago 19
@Averyofthemain
"s that an anti-white socialist"
How is Obama "anti white"? Also, explain how he is a socialism with an actual definition because words have actual meanings. You seem to be parroting right wing talk show hosts.
"hatred for the Consitution"
I'm betting he can spell "Constitution" at least.
You conservatives do this a lot- anyone who doesn't follow conservative assholism "hates" the Constitution. You repeat your "talking points" well and offer no explanations to this BS.
hipstermi 1 year ago
@hipstermi I see you don't deny his hatred for the constitution, which is a relief, a rare point of honesty in leftist correspondence.
Anti-white: Obama sat in the church, listened to the sermons and befriended the man who said this "Until we make white folks hate their whiteness, we will never be free." Calling him 'mentor' and his 'spiritual advisor'
Socialism: Government control of the means of production, through taxation and regulation, rather than ownership ala 'communism'.
Averyofthemain 1 year ago
@Averyofthemain
"I see you don't deny his hatred for the constitution, which is a relief, a rare point of honesty in leftist correspondence"
That's a conservative lie on your part.
I wrote" You conservatives do this a lot- anyone who doesn't follow conservative assholism "hates" the Constitution. You repeat your "talking points" well and offer no explanations to this BS."
You conservatives tend to lie a lot in these discussions.
hipstermi 1 year ago
@Averyofthemain
"Anti-white: Obama sat in the church, listened to the sermons and befriended"
Golly gosh! You seem "scared" of black people so much! I don't see that any worse the rest of Christianity and it's various bigotry, violence, and hate.
hipstermi 1 year ago
@Averyofthemain
"Socialism: Government control of the means of production, through taxation and regulation"
So GOP administrations DIDN'T tax or regulate industry? Socialist Reagan!
The gov. doesn't "control" all production. US Steel, HP, Campbell's. and thousands of businesses NOT government controlled.
"rather than ownership ala 'communism"
You're being dishonest here.
Socialism deals in common ownership...last I checked I still own my house, car, etc.
Pathetic you didn't know this.
hipstermi 1 year ago
@hipstermi mm-hmm, you own your car now, you own your house now...but the ethos of socialism is that you own nothing but what the government allows. Love the fact that socialism hasn't gotten its teeth in too deep just yet, deep enough to call your salary and property, even your family 'communal'. Why do you assist those with a corrupt, freedom-dissolving mindset gain ground in this nation?
Averyofthemain 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Averyofthemain
"mm-hmm, you own your car now, you own your house now...but the ethos of socialism is that you own nothing but what the government allows"
That's not true. Can you cite where you got that from?
"Why do you assist those with a corrupt, freedom-dissolving mindset gain ground in this nation?"
a. your "talking points" aren't true
b. conservatives are hateful little buggers, often bigots, who justify actions w/ a silly religion w/ invisible beings & magical powers.
hipstermi 1 year ago
@TheGoalSetter I think your in the right ball park. Except Obama is a NWO empty suit.
Shargrailar 1 year ago
@TheGoalSetter Careful! These white guy's pee-pees are very sensitive to opinions and facts that don't back up their world!
pureevilfnord 11 months ago
this guy is genius
sanchtech 1 year ago 3
@sanchtech I'm no Obama supporter, in fact I am almost openly pro tea party, but I think people need to lay off the Revd Wright thing. I totally trust Obama when he says that he never listened to his pastor, because Obama is really too smart to believe any kind of religious bullcrap. Obama may not be a nice person, but he is a heck of a brilliant guy. There's no way he actually listens to the crap that religious leaders come up with.
Mrparrot73 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
bill whittle is another white-anglo-saxon-josef mengele-pat buchanan-ann coulter-tea party american racist without backbones & promoting white supremacy. Your time has been fulfilled you euro-billy graham- christian demons from the pit of hell. YHWH rules and is bringing judgement upon your g8-nations sponsored white american "jibberish" doctrine. Be Blessed, Peace & Shalom,
ednoisin 1 year ago
You are way too generous, Bill. The kind of rhetoric Obama dished out would definitely be called racist if it had been a caucasian writing those words. Exchanging black for white makes it obvious that Obama is racist.
anonymous915 1 year ago 15
Oh, the good ole left in America - spitting on Dr. Martin Luther King's legacy daily!
dwm1812 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@dwm1812
"Oh, the good ole left in America - spitting on Dr. Martin Luther King's legacy daily!"
You do know King fought in the south...and despite a "Democrat" label was a CONSERVATIVE territory. You do know your southern red states still have a "problem" with race?
Then we can talk conservative bigotry towards gays.
hipstermi 1 year ago
Bill Whittle, you might just be my hero. lol Terrific job!
AnbuIce 1 year ago 2
Bravo
GATJR3 1 year ago
"Starting to"?
elitearbor 1 year ago
this is amazing
jfk1976 1 year ago
sticking up for your own group first isn't racism. i mean, sure, the shit that wright spewed is racism because it's both prejudice and hate, but stating facts or prefering your group is normal, not racist. actually to me being called racist has no meaning anymore.
delyshBB 1 year ago
i actually think the only way to ensure safety is profiling, call me racist, i dont care, but in your mind, you know im right
vercygentix 1 year ago 3
The danger is that you have to be very specific. I profile, but race plays no part in that. For example, if you dress like a gang banger, I will assume you are a gang banger and treat you as such. The color of your skin plays no part of this equation.
blkbltVette 1 year ago
as a white woman, the odds are 20 times higher to be raped by a black man than a white man. race is a legitimate thing for me to profile on because of these facts. on the other hand, obviously that if i see a black man dressed in a suit, i will have a better reaction towards him than towards a white gang banger.
delyshBB 1 year ago 23
I was going to +1 this comment, but I felt it needed clarification first. BB helps illustrate my point. Profiling takes many forms, but race doesn't have to be a part of it. Notice how she says the man in the suit isn't as big a priority as the gang banger, even though the gang banger is white. This is the key part of profiling. Your actions and choices which you display are the things that must be targeted. If profiling is done in this manner, it is extremely effective.
blkbltVette 1 year ago
@blkbltVette I'd have to argue with your comment about profiling.. there are many different levels and components to profiling, whether it's wrong or right is something i don't think I'll go into, but only focusing on how people act, is not nearly as helpful as you appear to think. When you are doing something that warents profiling, you normally change your behaviors to elude it. that's when other parameters come into play, added in with actions and behaviors, that's when profiling is effective
daPlumber702 1 year ago
I am not blind to race. As Alfonzo Rachel said, I see skin color and respect the differences between others. However, unlike liberals, I don't get hung up on race as a reason for divisions to be created but instead embrace the differences that we have but choose to ignore them in light of becoming a one America where regardless of race, we are judged by both character and will, and that in our America, any race has the potential to achieve any level, and be congratulated for it.
ShockwavePulsis 1 year ago
@ShockwavePulsis but isn't it already? slavery has been abolished for a couple hundred years. and as much as any of these civil rights advocates want to argue it, there is a lack of racism in America. There are those "bad seeds" that wish to instigate the argument and keep it alive, many of whom are those that advocate against it. Because just like with politics Civil rights advocates jobs are to make sure they have jobs tomorrow, if they admit racism is going away they don't have a job.
daPlumber702 1 year ago
@daPlumber702 Not particularly, we still continue to subdivide by introducing the concept of 'ethnicism' and 'diversity'. They're only terms that continue to divide. Why call someone African-American when they can just be called American? The culture of suppression if over, so why are we still bellyaching as a country over a problem that no longer exists? We can vett out individuals who continue to pursue racism, but even they are entitled to their own opinion. Not arguing against you.
FiFiLaRue81 1 year ago
@FiFiLaRue81 We "continue" to call someone an "African-American" because that someone DEMANDS that we call them "African-American" because Malcolm X taught him or her that "African-Americans" should NOT allow themselves to be called "Blacks", but instead they should demand to be called "Africans Who Happen to be in America" aka "African-Americans". So, FiFi, we don't call someone just an "American" as you request because, and only because, that someone does NOT WANT to be called an "American".
terryfordzim 1 year ago
@terryfordzim
"because that someone DEMANDS that we call them "African-American" because Malcolm X taught him or her that "African-Americans" should NOT allow themselves to be called "Blacks","
You need to cite sources. You are making a incorrect statement here. MalcolmX had nothing to do with that. It wasn't he term "blacks" people protested...it was "negro".
hipstermi 1 year ago
@FiFiLaRue81
"Why call someone African-American when they can just be called American"
Do you have a similar "problem" to German Americans, Irish Americans, etc?
hipstermi 1 year ago
@daPlumber702
"slavery has been abolished for a couple hundred years. and as much as any of these civil rights advocates want to argue it, there is a lack of racism in America."
???
So what in your Conservative fantasy, slavery went away right after Lincoln did? Guessing all those marches in the 50s-60 was for nothing.
"Civil rights advocates jobs are to make sure they have jobs "
You don't have to have a "job" to be an advocate, dumbass.
hipstermi 1 year ago
@hipstermi
as for your first comment.. moron... I didn't say that slavery ended, I said it was abolished. I never said that in the 50's and 60's there weren't bigots and racists. I am saying that there are far less in america now then there have ever been, or are in most other countries. I am also saying that it is not advantagious in the slightest to be racist in america today.
Your second point is thrown in the trash by names like jesse jackson and al sharpton.
daPlumber702 1 year ago
@daPlumber702
"Your second point is thrown in the trash by names like jesse jackson and al sharpton."
Not really. The point you failed to address or even articulate a resonable reply: "You don't have to have a "job" to be an advocate, dumbass." Lots of people are advocates against racism, or bigotry against gays, or any other group and it's not their "job".
The same holds true for Tea Party protesters...plenty have other jobs.
hipstermi 1 year ago
@daPlumber702
". I am saying that there are far less in america now then there have ever been, or are in most other countries"
Even if a problem is "less" that doesn't mean it's still not a problem.
I would also like to point out the very vocal conservative bigotry that goes on towards gay people. Citing a religion doesn't excuse it.
Sadly conservatives fail to recognize in another generation people will be ashamed of them for this as we are those that opposed civil rights.
hipstermi 1 year ago
@delyshBB .........Wait.....how does racial profiling comes to an advantage?
ras144 1 year ago
@delyshBB Please show me documentation that you are 20 times more likely to be raped by a black man. Where does this figure come from? I'm not saying you're a liar, but if you're going to make such a claim, you should really back it up.
pureevilfnord 11 months ago
@delyshBB STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!STEVEN CROWDER DRINKS HIS OWN MAN CHOWDER!
np001 11 months ago
@vercygentix Profiling saves lives. I mean, just look at Behavioral Analysis Units.
EpicDude86 1 year ago
This NEEDS to be on prime time TV.
OlimDeus 2 years ago
Bill Whittle FTW!
sutterbean1 2 years ago
Amen!
auhin 2 years ago 2
a very enlightening exercise. I challenge everyone to 'flip the mix' in their own conversations and see how color blind they truly are.....
stloucat 2 years ago
How about hair color profiling? If I see a blond girl steal jewelry and I report the hair color, am I discriminating against blonds?
mmlgamer 2 years ago
So let me ask a question to those who are afraid of Racial Profiling . If you saw your family member being murdered by a black man and then you reported to the police are they not allowed to look at all black men that fits the description? Same thing with terrorists if they look suspicious that is not discrimination during Wartime after thousands were murdered
RADIOFLYER47 2 years ago
"fits the description" is one thing. "Strip down and search every black guy you see" is another.
And what's "looks suspicious?" A turban? Do you think Timothy McVeigh looked suspicious? What about Ted Bundy?
smiledammit24 2 years ago
Would you rather feel offended if you were asked questions and then later on you heard a man caught ready to blow up an airplane it saved hundreds of lives. Everybody stop feeling sorry for yourselves this is wartime, sacrifice a little bit of yourself for others and stop thinking about yourself
RADIOFLYER47 2 years ago
Wartime? I don't remember congress declaring war...
smiledammit24 2 years ago
Please see: Iraq Liberation Act of 1998. Thank you.
Minionuup 2 years ago
That was not a declaration of war. If you actually read the document it does not authorize the use of military force.
smiledammit24 2 years ago
To be precisely clear, here's a quote from the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998: "Nothing in this Act shall be construed to authorize or otherwise speak to the use of United States Armed Forces (except as provided in section 4(a)(2)) in carrying out this Act ."
QED, we never declared war on Iraq.
smiledammit24 2 years ago
LoL Justice = Just us
Remember Enron? The case is dismissed and everyone walks, the case files were in building seven, you know the one that wasn't hit by a plane.
Remember OJ? His book "if" I did it? He spits on our faces
Anyone in jail for the Katrina Memorial Hospital Euthanasia by Dr. Pou?
Anyone in Jail for the Waco massacre Ruby Ridge Watergate Invading Grenada Gulf of Tonkin lie
Over throwing and assassinating democratically elected foreign leaders?
The bail out cash grabs & lies?
Slavestorms 2 years ago
Bill, that's why I am always most emphatic when criticizing Pres. Obama. I only direct my attacks against the 50% that comes from his mother's side. I am most careful not to say a single word against the 50% that is his father's side. Because I do not wish to be charged with Racism, I am most careful to limit my remarks to just 50%. We can call it "The Allowable 50%",
However, I find that speaking against his 100% Marism background is fair game.
Thanks Bill, thanks.
Howard128eM 2 years ago
Martin Luther King, Jr said "I have a dream that my four children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character, " and it's such a logical, reasonable thing that even a 5-yr old can grasp it -- and I speak from experience.
Just like with civil rights legislation, I'm waiting for the Left to stop filibustering (again) and grow up, and bring their race-bating extortionists (jackson/sharpton/et al) along with them.
VALivingston 2 years ago 2
Please explain why conservatives are claiming to follow that very motto and still support racial profiling at airports. Skin color doesn't matter right? (Btw I am not defending liberals. This message is coming from a non-partisan independant thinker)
el3m3ntsk8s 2 years ago
I'd like to believe you're both independent and thinking however I find it difficult when you create a straw-man with the question; it's Apples, Oranges. And I reject the implication that it's a conservative principle. I should note I have some liberal acquaintances who are 'for it' and couldn't believe Bush didn't make it legal after 9/11.
If you want to discuss racial profiling, I'm happy to, and I can argue all three sides of the debate as well, and throw in some common sense as a bonus.
VALivingston 2 years ago
My own experience w/ racial profiling: I and others my color were once stopped by two cops of the opposite color for, basically, 'being the wrong color in that neighborhood.' They talked to us, told us what was up, we understood their problem, they saw we weren't trouble, they treated us w/ respect and apologized for troubling us. I saw two cops who cared about the neighborhood, and felt safer, frankly.
The post-9-11TSA rent-cops? I hate them passionately and feel less safe now when I fly.
VALivingston 2 years ago 2
Well i don't argue that it makes anyone less safe, but that doesnt make it right. It's like saying you care about excelling through school and getting a good job by lying and cheating. Racial Profiling is cheating the Constitution. Is it just too much to ask for a little bit of probable cause? I mean seriously.
el3m3ntsk8s 2 years ago
I completely agree that there is a racism double standard, and that it's wrong that it's okay for a black/other person to say something but it's wrong for a white person to say the same thing.
I completely disagree with your republican views, however.
salamati7 2 years ago
"There is no place in this land for the hate-mongers and bigots" ~Ronald Reagan
AmericanPie37 2 years ago 3
This guy is exactly right.
mikeschatname 2 years ago 3
Can People who live in other countries stop discussing out politics, I honestly dont care as to what you have to say.
samuils 2 years ago
Rich Canadians go to America for healthcare. Poor Canadians wait for their turn. Rich Americans like their healthcare. Poor Americans just get worst off...
Indeed, the world's elites come to the US for treatment. Though, of all industrialized countries, America is the worst place to be if you're not in the elite or at least rich enough to pay for the most expensive healthcare of the world...
FoucheSC 2 years ago
FoucheSC Now I might start the debate with you, and point out some things BUT, sonsidering that you are from Canada and live there, do us a favor and stop trying to debate our politics, its honeslty none of your business!
samuils 2 years ago
Yeah right! America is the best place to be for treatment. I guess you haven't been around. Even those without health insurance of any kind get treatment. They just get a bill at the end of there stay as well which most of them don't end up paying and other end up paying for them in terms of higher fees. Kind of like a store that gets ripped off all the time they end up jacking up the prices to cover their loss. Not to mention government imposed fees and licenses.
MrRonnierams 2 years ago
Yeah, thanks Captain Obvious. Do me a favor, point out to me any product in the entire world that is the best product or service in its respective class/industry that is NOT the most expensive. C'mon man. That's like me saying, "yeah, the Honda Accord is a longer lasting and overall better car than a Kia Rio, but the Honda Accord costs more." DUH!!! But, by your logic, I guess the government should give everyone Honda Accords because its not fair if they drive Kia Rios. Wahhhhhhh! ;(
DonKeyBaums 2 years ago
Oh yeah, one more big unfortunate fact for you that blows your point out of the water. UNLIKE CANADA, in the US ANYONE can walk into a hospital ANYWHERE in our country and they will receive the BEST healthcare treatment in the world IMMEDIATELY. Again, NO WHERE ELSE IN THE ENTIRE WORLD DOES THIS OCCUR. THIS FASTEST AND BEST MEDICAL TREATMENT IN THE ENTIRE WORLD. Of course its the most expensive, its the best by far, that's why. Does it need reform? Yes, but it IS THE BEST IN THE WORLD.
DonKeyBaums 2 years ago
When I was 20 years old, I had no health insurance of any form. I had appendicitis & was rushed to the local hospital, my appendix was 2-4 hours from rupturing & I had no money in the bank & no insurance. Guess what, no one at the hospital asked me a single question about whether or not I could pay, whether I had insurance or whether I was a legal citizen. They put me on a gurney & 45 minutes later, I was in recovery after having my appendix removed. I would've died anywhere else in the world.
DonKeyBaums 2 years ago 2
So how much does your life mean to you? Enough to suffer bankruptcy to save it or at least pay the cost even if it is significant? Enough to pay for your own insurance? Your life is your concern, you pay your own way. Nobody likes being made to pay for people they don't know and perhaps don't like.
Federalist306 2 years ago
Man, that was good Bill
Zoklor 2 years ago
THANK-YOU Bill Whittle!
Americans NEED this message.
Everyone: Send this link to everyone you know!
Controlledfall 2 years ago
OMG I hope that no one watches this crap! Please wake up!
ilDouch3 2 years ago
how do you argue with that?
thetwistofcain 2 years ago
interesting
CheeezMaster 2 years ago
PJTV is a bunch of mind readers they say what I feel!
702otown 2 years ago 3
Palin/Whittle 2012!
DonKeyBaums 2 years ago 3
Palin? Seriously? She's a blubbering moron. If she ran in 2012 as the Republican candidate, she'd make it a guaranteed win for the Democrats.
Deltaego 2 years ago
She's hardly a moron. She well managed one of the largest import/export locations in the world. She well managed one of the largest military sites in the entire world. She very well managed one of the largest fish and wildlife land and water masses in the entire world.
In 2010, the party that will win will be based on who the special interests have the most faith in. That is, unless we as a nation force our leaders to audit the Fed and end corruption. McCain was too liberal, he ended it.
DonKeyBaums 2 years ago
If you consider McCain a liberal, then you don't know what a liberal is, and you probably affiliate it with anyone that isn't a retarded neoconservative/theocrat.
Yes, she is a moron. When has she ever uttered anything intelligent? Alaska isn't one of the largest import/export regions in the world (doesn't even make any sense to begin with), and it isn't one of the largest military sites in the world. Managing wildlife? You should congratulate her on managing the moon's orbit too.
Deltaego 2 years ago
I don't consider McCain a liberal, he does. Go to the Huffington Post since you get your news from the far left and its quite clear, search "John McCain Accidentally Calls Himself A Liberal Republican". Go to US census site to see the import/export. Google search "Alaska's Military Importance" and there's tons of options to go read and confirm. The fisheries & wildlife are just as obvious & you look foolish to debate that. You should get a point & some facts or at least be relevant & accurate.
DonKeyBaums 2 years ago
And McCain corrected himself. He doesn't have liberal policies. He may be socially liberal, but he's still a neoconservative.
Alaska does have military importance, but you claimed it's one of the largest military sites in the world, which is just so far from the truth. There are only 16,000 soldiers under Alaskan command, and most of that is the National Guard (Reservists/Militia).
You can't claim that she managed the wildlife well. It's wildlife for crying out loud, you can't "manage" it.
Deltaego 2 years ago
Just look at how significant it was for us during WW2, its HIGHLY significant. Your numbers ignore the air force bases and active military personel and that around 1/3 of Alaska's population is military, of course I'm sure that doesn't matter either. Of course you manage wild life, if you had a clue, you'd know that fishing, hunting, crabbing, etc are heavily and highly regulated by the government's wildlife services. You also blow off the massive amounts of food/game Alaska provides the WORLD.
DonKeyBaums 2 years ago
Perhaps you'd prefer to debate something that more facts can be provided on? I'm not big on the he said/she said you're dancing down. Why don't we debate something else like ACORN, Van Jones, the 912 Project, Health Care Reform, our national debt, the Stimulus, Cap & Trade, or something else where fact, logic & history can be applied. You know, those darn things that can't be made into victims as the liberal doctrine/ideology loathes to be. Just let me know & I'll debunk whatever is incorrect.
DonKeyBaums 2 years ago
ACORN: Non-issue. Doesn't deserve any attention. So much disinformation about the scandal, that people don't know what actually happened.
Van Jones: Call Republicans assholes. A lot of them are. Lost his job because Democrats are spineless.
Glenn Beck: Is a fucking moron and a blatant racist. Everything he says should be ignored. He only infects others with his stupidity.
Deltaego 2 years ago
ACORN has absolutely everything to do with scandal and immorality. Only an individual with no morality would tolerate evidence that across every office shown there is an orchestrated attempt to mask prostitution and child sexual slavery. An investigation is more than warranted. Van Jones did far more than just call Republicans assholes. His histroy incredibly radical and he's a convicted felon, a self-avowed communist and has multiple videos of him making highly unfounded racist allegations.
DonKeyBaums 2 years ago
Glenn Beck has the gumption to expose corruption, he did it to Bush and now he's doing it with Obama. You clearly are a bandwagon jumper. If you're not, send me this compelling evidence of him being a moron and a racist. Didn't think so. No reason for Americans to be opposed to health care reform? Oh, so I guess the Gallup and Rasmussen polls showing that over 80% of Americans with health care don't want the government involved any more with their lives is irrelevant. Yeah, that makes sense.
DonKeyBaums 2 years ago
Health Care Reform: No reason why Americans should be so opposed. The opposition comes from widespread disinformation caused by the Health Insurance companies themselves.
National Debt: Doesn't need to be discussed. Just don't stick another NeoConservative in office.
The Stimulus: So much of it was wasted, so much of it was unnecessary. Democrats and Republicans alike are tools to the special interest groups.
Cap & Trade: Stops acid rain.
Deltaego 2 years ago
National debt doesn't need to be discussed? That's the dumbest thing you've said so far. Its the largest debt we've ever had and Obama quadrupled it in less than 6 months. He spent more money than all presidents and administrations COMBINED since the BEGINNING of our nation. If you think that's not relevant you're completely clueless. You're right on the Stimulus to this extent - it only looked out for special interests for both Republicans AND Democrats.
DonKeyBaums 2 years ago
I think you're confusing debt with deficit. Debt isn't a big deal, deficit however is, and Obama has increased the deficit with all the trivial bailouts.
And no he has not spent more money than all the other presidents combined. National Debt has only increased by 1 trillion since Obama was in office. Bush increased the debt by 6 trillion.
Deltaego 2 years ago
A conservative that says that debt isn't a big deal. That statement is the antithesis of a conservative philosophy. You're either bogusly representing that you're a conservative or you're blatantly ignorant to what conservative means. You just don't present the truth. Go get some facts and relative data or we're done. I'm not going to debate someone that creates information out of thin air with no credibility or accuracy.
DonKeyBaums 2 years ago 2
Once again, you don't seem to understand the different between debt and deficit. The US has a 13 trillion dollar debt, but has a few hundred billion in deficit. Debt isn't a big deal, as it can be managed over time. Deficit is much more important than debt.
Canada has a huge debt as well, but it does not have a deficit, and has a surplus of 12 billion.
I'm a Canadian conservative. I believe in peoples individual rights, and I believe in fiscal responsibility.
Deltaego 2 years ago
Don't tell me I don't understand. The deficit is the difference between the money Government takes in, called receipts, and what the Government spends, called outlays, each year. Receipts include the money the Government takes in from income, excise and social insurance taxes as well as fees and other income. Outlays include all Federal spending including social security and Medicare benefits along with all other spending ranging from medical research to interest payments on the debt.
DonKeyBaums 2 years ago 2
When there is a deficit, Treasury must borrow money needed for the government to pay its bills. We borrow the money by selling Treasury securities like T-bills, notes, Treasury Inflation-Protected securities & savings bonds to the public. Additionally, the Government Trust Funds are required by law to invest accumulated surpluses in Treasury securities. The Treasury securities issued to the public & to the Government Trust Funds (intragovernmental holdings) then become part of the total debt.
DonKeyBaums 2 years ago
One way to think about the debt is as accumulated deficits. For information concerning the deficit, visit the Financial Management Service website to view the Monthly Treasury Statement of Receipts and Outlays of the United States Government. You can read more on this topic in the Federal Borrowing and Debt chapter of the Analytical Perspectives volume of the most recent budget. Tell me again if I don't know the difference between debt and deficit or if its you who is again sorely mistaken.
DonKeyBaums 2 years ago
Are you trying to say public debt? Even then, you're not making any sense. And I looked at that website, couldn't find anything. Please provide a link to the exact page.
Deltaego 2 years ago
You can't put links up on here, you know that or I'd at least hope you know that. My description is entirely accurate. If you knew anything about economics you would've defaulted quite some time ago whether we were taling macro or micro economics. You clearly do not understand our government's economic policies. I can only assume, but won't state as a bold fact like you, that you're Canadian. I'd love to know if you're Canadian or not as that would explain a great deal if you are.
DonKeyBaums 2 years ago
Yes you can post links. They won't be hot linked, but I can still copy and paste them into my url bar (if you ever decide to provide the links).
I've studied macroeconomics, so I know something about economics. I know a lot about your government, and I obviously know more about it than you do.
I've told you I'm a Canadian, I've told you I'm a member of the Conservative Party of Canada. It says on my profile that I live in Canada. Why are you only now just starting to think I'm a Canadian?
Deltaego 2 years ago
Yes, you're the highly exhaulted Canadian that knows more than I about my own government. I'm sure you know more about my state too. You've also posted no links as you cannot post links so just keep lying it amuses me much like some three stooges slap schtick comedy. If you do not know how to copy and paste into Google what I've typed and you wish to challenge, then there's really no hope for you. Just keep demanding you're right without proff.
DonKeyBaums 2 years ago
Since you're emphatically denying reality, I've taken the time to type this out ONE MORE TIME so that folks chuckling at your banter and disinformation can see that you've been even futher rebuked and debunked. Go to Google, type "Financial Management Service. A Bureau of the United States Department of Treasury" you'll see all of my comments are accurate & specifically inline with our economic structures, policies and their respective definitions. Get over it, you're wrong. Go "bark" elsewhere!
DonKeyBaums 2 years ago
Jesus fucking christ, I did, and I did go to the site. I can't find what you're talking about, that's why I asked you to please provide a link. And what disinformation? I've provided links/sources. You have not provided any links/sources. You are not making any sense. You're acting like a child. You're such a typical Republican.
If you want me to take you seriously, then quit acting like a child, and provide some links. Stop deflecting.
Deltaego 2 years ago