Ann Coulter Music Video Tribute "I'm In Love With Ann Coulter"

[sandun001]

GOOD LUCK REPUBLICANS ! GOOD LUCK REPUBLICANS ! GOOD LUCK REPUBLICANS ! GOOD LUCK REPUBLICANS ! GOOD LUCK REPUBLICANS ! GOOD LUCK REPUBLICANS ! GOOD LUCK REPUBLICANS ! GOOD LUCK REPUBLICANS ! GOOD LUCK REPUBLICANS ! GOOD LUCK REPUBLICANS ! GOOD LUCK REPUBLICANS ! GOOD LUCK REPUBLICANS ! GOOD LUCK REPUBLICANS ! GOOD LUCK REPUBLICANS ! GOOD LUCK REPUBLICANS ! GOOD LUCK REPUBLICANS ! GOOD LUCK REPUBLICANS ! GOOD LUCK REPUBLICANS ! GOOD LUCK REPUBLICANS ! GOOD LUCK REPUBLICANS !

[sandun001]

Liberals sucks ,

Ann Coulter rocks.

Ann coulter is an angel sent by the GOD.

[sdavis732010]

lol she has freinds

[sdavis732010]

well your the only one. no wait i have a bullet that loves her to

[usgop]

Brains..beauty..conservative..­and a pair of brass ones..what's not to love?

[koolkitch28]

Ann Coulter is the most courageous, honest, intelligent, and beautiful pundit on the face of the earth! You vile liberals are jealous and stupid.

JK

St. Charles, MO.

[koolkitch28]

Ann Coulter is the most couragous, honest , intelligent, and beautiful pundit on earth. You vile liberals are jealous and stupid.

Jim K

St Charles, Mo.

[Fuctmentality]

@koolkitch28 Honest & intellegent? You do realize that everyone of her books has shittons not just tons but shittons of references that are entirely inaccurate, the only reason she doesn't get sued for liable is because she (pretends that she) believes they say what she claims.

[koolkitch28]

@Fuctmentality Coulter has footnotes unlike libs because as Reagan said its not that dems are stupid, its just they know so many things that are untrue. Her footnotes are right, they don't attack her books on substance, McCarthy was right, libs lied and slandered & carried the h20 for commies as they killed 100 million people in less than a 100years. Yes she said Evan Thomas son instead of grandson it was corrected immediately, unlike the decades of unremorseful treason, slander of the left

[Fuctmentality]

@koolkitch28 Except they're ENDnotes, & they don't check out. She acts as though she believes they do say what she claims when confronted ergo she's either honest & retarded, or intelligent & realizes if she pretends to believe they state what she claims she can't get sued for liable.Can't have it both ways.& It was the right that supported the only administration in history that committed treason.

"A witty quot proves nothing" Voltaire

watch?v=ZHx0oLrGjKY

[koolkitch28]

@Fuctmentality The quote fits. Who told you they don't check out? Consider the source. I have read the, I have observed the fallout, nit picking grammatical errors if any. She responds to all so called critics. FDR, Truman, Carter and Clinton committed treason. FDR and Truman Venona proves it. Carter enlisted the KGB to defeat Reagan, kgb documents prove it. Clinton, for campaign cash from Lorelle space gave the chinese merve tech. How do feel about Johnson? Notice a trend,These are facts

[Fuctmentality]

@koolkitch28 watch?v=ZHx0oLrGjKY

& I have checked them myself. & If you think stating "religions fundementalist of all types would never fly on a nude airline" = Ann Coulter's statement "[new york time}blamed 9/11 on religious fundamentalist of all types" You are a moron.

Scratch that you're a Coulter fan you are a moron & a fascist.

[koolkitch28]

@Fuctmentality al frankenwould attack you garbled quote&meaning. read Freidman naked air. Its clear Friedmanthinks terrorism solved if naked airline,cause religiousnuts of every stripe too modest to fly naked, agreed? Coulter correctly laughs on page265 Treason,yeah amish extremists ready to kill get it? Friedman equates muslims and christians when zero christians have bombed airlines and every airline bombed by muslims. Get it doubt it logic excapes you, friedman and ?Franken

[Fuctmentality]

@koolkitch28 Can you form complete sentences please? & It doesn't change the fact she accused him of stating something he didn't. Sorry but liable is liable, making jokes about liable isn't justification for it.

[koolkitch28]

@Fuctmentality obviously only take frankens word that coulter did something wrong read friedmans idiotic article then read coulters book, she quoted Friedman accurately. Friedman is a pathetic thinker, and Franken can't read. I don't know if you can read, but you refuse to read, you instead just post random lunatics you heard said something

[Fuctmentality]

@koolkitch28 I could literally pull out dozens of examples of Coulter pulling this shit, but b4 I do I have to ask, would it change your opinion in any way or are you unaffected by the truth?

[koolkitch28]

@Fuctmentality Fire away, but don't just state a pub has committed treason without any backup whatso ever. How about a response to every democrat presidents treason? I backed up my charges. Your silence is proof positive they are guilty of the charge, and the charge is Treason.

I would love to shoot down your trifling accusations, if you will address what she is saying with the words rather than the freakin grammar and sentence structure.

[Fuctmentality]

@koolkitch28 Whats a pub? & I do have back up I just didn't think you blacked out the Bush regime. Okay explaine this one

[koolkitch28]

@Fuctmentality pub short for republican. How could any pro american pub president including Bush commit treason? It's impossible, only people who sell out america to foreign enemies can commit treason. This is why every democrat president since Kennedy(the last america loving dem)has committed treason. Quote Coulter"Whether they are defending the USSR or bleating for Saddam Hussein, liberals are always against America. They are either traitors or idiots".

[Fuctmentality]

@koolkitch28 Bush pro American? & Libby, outing a covert CIA operative isn't treason, or if he didn't out her himself (unlikely) covering the ass of those who did?

Reagan (not pro-american either) giving weapons to our enemies isn't fucking treason?

What the fuck are you one?

To quot a man that shared Coulter's views "What fortune it is for leaders men do not think".

Also I don't see you responding to the facts.

[koolkitch28]

@Fuctmentality Val plame wasn't a cia operative or charges would have been filed, they weren't because she wasn't. and Libby didn't out her Richard Armitage did and the prosecuters knew armitage not libby did the outing, but pursued the purjury trap anyway. cheap lib typical dirty trick. By the way they new york times reporters are constantly revealing top secret documents and exposing cia and military gitmo secret operatives even their addresses and ph#s i dont see you in outrage over that.

[koolkitch28]

@Fuctmentality Reagan, did not know the extent of Col oliver Norths operations, and even so.. it was done to save military personnel who were captured and tortured. It was also done to combat Democrats acting as stooges for communists in Nicaragua. The cold war was on and once again dems were for the commies, reagan was for freedom fighters hardly treason fighting commies and muslim fanatics. Don't get your insult or quote

[Fuctmentality]

@koolkitch28

Really it was done to make Reagan look good, by getting the prisoners freed (as evident from the fact the people gaurding them were literally watching their watches, waiting for the time to pass). & Actually yes, the actions in Nicaragua, were by definition acts of terrorism. Charges WERE FILED dipshit. & What's you're point the person leaking information is the one I'm pissed at. & Again covering for treason, is TREASON.

[koolkitch28]

@Fuctmentality The people of nicaragua voted in free elections supervised by that traitorous clown Carter for Reagans contras. End of debate, you lose. they chose Reagan, because the commies were the worst. and Obama's also supports commies over freedom in hondorus and chili more traitorous activity. Charges were not filed against libby or any other bush admin official for outing a secret agent in court. It was all perjury bogus ridiculus crap. And Armitage did the outing.

[koolkitch28]

@Fuctmentality Your posts are far more garbled than mine, bloggers vote. What exactly are you asking in your paraphrased post? Coulter is correct, Darwin fully expected the fossil record to prove we came from slime. and stated if we don't find it I'm wrong. Life exploded in the cambrian period, but pre cambrian fossils did not show any progression of life , it was if some one placed all the fossils in the cambrian layers(read God) Darwinism guys said our proof didn't fossilize. Then chinese

[Fuctmentality]

"all that would be foisted on unsuspecting children in order to protect kindergartners from the scourge of AIDS. As one heroine of the sex education movement told an approving New York Times reporter, "My job is not to teach one right value system. Parents and churches teach moral values. My job is to say, `These are the facts,' and to help the students, as adults, decide what is right for them."9

9; At Dartmouth, A Helping Candor.

Next.

[koolkitch28]

@Fuctmentality This is more paraphrasing franken would be upset. This is from a chapter where aids activists stated that aids was every bit a heterosexual problem as much as homosexual. Coulter insists in the book she was talking about america only. There was no explosion of aids in heterosexual populations as promised by aids activists. Based on these lies from aids activists ,children were subjected to this unnecessary sexual crap at early ages because of more lib lies. would like moreinfo

[Fuctmentality]

@koolkitch28 "The Times reporter, who was clearly not trying to make the evolutionists sound retarded, was forced to keep describing the evolutionists' entire retort to these arguments as: Others disagree.^2 That's it. No explanation, no specifics, just "others disagree.""

Godless

2: nytimes(dot)com/2005/08/22/nat­­ional/22design.html?ex=128236­3­200&en=0d9a7b9dd39eafcf&ei=5­09­0&partner=rssuserland&emc=r­ss

You really want to explain that one?

[koolkitch28]

@Fuctmentality careful, you paraphrasing got a page # foot note # from Godless? Its sounds like Coulter is saying the times reporter did not have the knowledge to defend the belief in evolution. Rather relied on dogma with all the fury of a zealot of religion. Coulters point is belief in Darwinism evolution is every bit based on faith as any other religion. the reporter couldn't articulate scientific responses, she/or he relied on dogma of the religion of evolution. Give me more info

[Fuctmentality]

@koolkitch28 & Please for the love of Odin use proper English, I can't even tell what you're saying half the time.

& Yes that was exactly what coulter was saying in regards to evolution. Now I'm going to re post itThis time I want a fucking answer.

[koolkitch28]

@Fuctmentality then chinese found pre cambrian fossils and they disproved their theories. The point is the fossil record doesn't prove darwinsm evolution any more than the bible proves God.

[koolkitch28]

@Fuctmentality As it turns out many evolution scientists who have been unable to prove random mutation created flagellums have abandoned darwin and embraced aliens instead. Why not say God , its just faith.

Scientists climb the mountain of discovery all their lives and then at the end arrive at the top of the mountain and there before them is an old man in a beard or an alien . Stephen Hawking for one

[Fuctmentality]

@koolkitch28 Yea it's kind of obvious you're trolling now, as no one would be dumb enough to think Hawking is a biologist or that he's embraced exogenesis.

[koolkitch28]

@Fuctmentality You are a liberal on a conservative web site, but somehow I'm a troll. That's the kind of clear thinking I expect from liberals.

[jiggidyjones]

@koolkitch28 lol @ calling youtube a "conservative website"

[koolkitch28]

@jiggidyjones

The title of this page where I debated the liberal whacko is Ann Coulter Music Video Tribute "I'm In love with Ann Coulter".

Now be honest, a troll would not be someone who agrees with the page premise. The troll is the slime ball who has to go on a pro Ann site and smear her. MY POST WAS ACCURATE, AND DEVASTATING, he accused me of being a troll. Now that is laughable!

[jiggidyjones]

@koolkitch28 That doesn't make youtube a conservative website. The reasons videos have comments is for... comments. Not just comments that agree with the video, but all comments. You presented a laughable bit of opinion when you said Stephen Hawking rejected evolution and embraced an alien origin theory. No respectable scientist has done such, the closest they have gotten is suggesting the hypothesis that life was seeded by comets. So yes that does sound like a troll.

[jiggidyjones]

@jiggidyjones Also, evolution has nothing to do with the origin of life. Mixing up scientific theories is also a common trait trolls share. Perhaps all trolls evolved from the same conservative think tank.

[koolkitch28]

@jiggidyjones God believers don't need evolution to be false, atheists need evolution to be true, as evidenced by the attack Ann and her defenders get when they pose the radical theory that evolution is based on as much faith as religion, and followers of evolution theory zeolots. People who name call instead of using evidence.

Internet users know the definition of troll. People who can't stand that someone would dedicate a postive post about Ann. Spew your venom elsewhere.

[jiggidyjones]

@koolkitch28 Atheists do not need evolution, atheists acknowledge the fact that the human race understands very little about the universe. Most atheists accept evolution as a valid scientific theory because of the mountains of research and data that supports it. Believers in make believe fairy tales do not like uncertainty so they choose to insert their imaginary friends into every gap of their knowledge.

If there was actual evidence that contradicted evolution, I would gladly change my mind.

[jiggidyjones]

@jiggidyjones If you honestly believe that believing a scientific theory such as evilution takes faith, then you need to sit your but into a science classroom and learn what science is and why it is more trustworthy than 2000+ year old book authored by people who's knowledge of the world would be considered laughable at best.

Science has produced everything you see around you, including the computer you are using to view this. How much has your bible accomplished?

[koolkitch28]

@jiggidyjones What has the bible accomplished,... ah Western Civilization, the abolishment of slavery, the greatest standard of living on the face of the earth. All the technology, disease eradication, all thanks to believers in a 2000 year old book.

[jiggidyjones]

@koolkitch28 Are we talking about the same bible? The bible that actually condones slavery, the subjugation of women, and even raping women and tearing out their unborn child? That bible? People used the bible to justify slavery back when it was still legal.

Western civilization? Medicine? Technology? Sure those advancements may have been made by believers, but that is only because you would be burned at the stake if you were not a believer. Nothing in the bible helped them make those advances

[jiggidyjones]

@jiggidyjones It was in spite of religion that they made those advances. They pressed on with scientific findings even when they seemed to contradict what their religious leaders taught, and because of that you have all of what you see now. It didn't matter whether they believed what the bible said or not, none of our scientific advances had roots in anything the bible had to say, they were all discovered outside of that book in the real world using the scientific method.

[koolkitch28]

@jiggidyjones You can't seperate the abolitionist from Christianity, impossible. Moses freed his fellow Jews, Spartacus freed his fellow gladiators, this is true. For the first time in the history of the world, American and British Christians used their own blood, sweat and treasure to free other people around the world because of an idea. A Christian idea, that man was a special creation of God, endowed by a creator, above any king, and therefore was equal before God. .

[jiggidyjones]

@koolkitch28 except if you are a slave, then you can be beaten and all that good stuff. Or if you are a women in the enemy culture, then you are going to be raped and possibly have your unborn child ripped from your womb. All of which are also from the bible. As I said before, it is in spite of the bible that great deeds were accomplished by religious people. If they were to follow the bible they would be horrible people.

[koolkitch28]

@jiggidyjones Have you ever read the New Testament? You keep talking about ripping babies from the womb. the latest statistics on Black people and abortion, should make you wake up about who's ripping babies from the womb. Washington D. C. losing black population is chalked up to everything but the truth, some 60% of black pregnancies end in abortion. Somewhere Margaret Sanger is applauding, her racist dreams have come true.

[koolkitch28]

@jiggidyjones Christians, knowing they were endowed by God pursue science & all endevors withpassion to discover their God given potential & understand the universe. Christians have produced , & sacraficed more for the benefit of others than any other philosophy on earth. Christians in this country go to war when asked by oppressed peoplearound the world.People of every race, & religion. Because uniquely Christians are commanded to see common humanity, we are all created by the same God..

[jiggidyjones]

@koolkitch28 Most religions share that trait, and humanists also do as well. You do not need religion to have a curiosity towards the way the world works or even a desire to help others. The bible does not provide those things, they are in every human regardless of religion or lack of religion. You also mention how much Christians "help" other countries, but the vast majority of these helpful missions are simply veiled attempts to spread Christianity.

[koolkitch28]

@jiggidyjones Muslims care only for other muslims, Buddists, Hindu treat creatures and humans in the same manner. Jewish people are understandably less inclusive. No other philosophy is even close to Christianity. They are unique. The proof is in the putting Christians, created the modern worlds leap forward and it should be spread, it would be a good thing. The ends justify the means for humanists, it always has and always will lead to oppression and war, since they seek control.

[jiggidyjones]

@koolkitch28 So your view of other religions is horribly misinformed, which isn't surprising. Muslims follow the same two books you do, they just have an extra one (sorta like Mormons). Buddhists and Hindu are also very sensitive to the needs of the people, i'm not sure what you mean by they treat animals and humans the same. Christianity is just as inclusive as the other two abrahamic religions, i.e. If you do not believe as they do then you don't get into the special club house (heaven).

[jiggidyjones]

@jiggidyjones I'm not 100% certain but I think there have been more holy wars than secular wars, with Christianity leading the charge. Your modern world was forced onto many indigenousness cultures forcing them to accept Christianity or die (Native Americans are a good example). Watch the news and tell me who is trying to grab for control in America's political system, the hard core conservative religious right or.... well since there is no party that is secular, dems are mostly Christians ....

[koolkitch28]

@jiggidyjones More ridiculus nonsense. The commie socialists, the humanists as you call them murdered over 100million people in the 20th century. More people killed in peacetime during that time than all the wars of the 20th century combined. And we a Christian country were dragged kicking and screaming into those wars. We only go when begged. Native Americans slaughtered each other mercilessly. Perhaps 1 million of them lived on the entire North American continent. Manifest Destiny

[jiggidyjones]

@koolkitch28 humanists are the commie socialists?!?! Please educate yourself and google humanism. en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Humanism... you know what forget it. You are obviously undereducated. Take the time to learn something, take some college classes. It is no wonder you believe the way you do, you are completely delusional. If the things you believe were actually true then I would be right behind you, except they are not.

[koolkitch28]

@jiggidyjones Progressive, secular humanist, environmentalist, liberal. Just a way, for displaced European commie socialists to fool people into supporting them. No words or definitions are safe from a liberal..

The true Classic liberals are the Republicans.

[koolkitch28]

@jiggidyjones You are truely dillusional if you think the democrat party is pro christian.

[jiggidyjones]

@koolkitch28 99% of ALL politicians are Christian. The difference between republican Christians and democrat Christians is that the rep. tend to be more literal bible creationist Christian where democrats are more metaphorical bible wishy washy Christians. And don't say democrats are not true christians because you would be committing the no true scottsman fallacy.

[koolkitch28]

@jiggidyjones You need to read Godless, instead of swallowing what people tell you. Just because a college professor tells you so, doesn't mean it's true. There is no diversity of thought on college campus, evidenced by you're attitude.

[koolkitch28]

@jiggidyjones American Christians formed a country, so everyone could worship God any way they see fit. Try being a Christian in Saudi Arabia, or Egypt these days. Try being one one anywhere. Only Christians, go past words, good vibes don't cut it. The Marxists were exposed so brightly in the 20th century for the monsters they are, the pinko's just started calling themselves humanists, and environmentalists, to fool Lenin's useful idiots.

[koolkitch28]

@jiggidyjones Evolutionists believe purely as a matter of faith that individual, unrelated mutations facilitated the production of all 200 necessary parts, completely by chance and thus created a flagellum. Can't explain the eye, Yes, keep faith out of the classroom. Read Coulter's book "Godless". Many listed scientists have abandoned Darwin. Bacteria developing resistance is not Darwin evolution, because it's still a bacteria. Show me a fruit fly becomming a wasp, that would be Darwin.

[jiggidyjones]

@koolkitch28 no that would not be evolution, thats like saying a cat could evolve from a dog. Bacteria becoming resistant is evolution, but it is micro evolution and not the macro evolution Darwin spoke mainly about. There are plenty of places on the internet that do show how the flagellum came about, and clearly show that the "irreducibly complex" argument is bogus. Instead of blindly accepting an argument that fits your world view try looking for the counter arguments first.

[koolkitch28]

@Fuctmentality the flagellum has many parts. It is much like a mouse trap which has what 3 parts. if any of the parts are not correct, you don't catch 50% less mice you catch zero mice. So a flagellum of say a sperm is the same way if one part doesn't mutate right, you don't fertilize 50% less eggs, you get zero. and random mutation (darwinsim) can't explain the exquisite design of a flagellum or a cell. STephen hawking and many others acknowledge this and have abandoned darwin for aliens

[koolkitch28]

@koolkitch28 Reagan told us you think you know so much that is untrue. You have just admitted Ann Coulter is mainly correct. In fact she is completely correct because she was only discussing Darwin, not your conflation of issues. Piltdown Man,Archaeoraptor,peppered moths, computer modeling of the eye, Haeckel's drawings, Miller-Urey atmosphere, hoax after hoax. It seems alot of people NEED evolution to be true. Enjoy you're faith, keep praying in school.

[koolkitch28]

@Fuctmentality From Treason, Chapter 1 endnotes 45 total, of the 45 over 30 come right out of mainstream lib papers verbatum. Including New York times, Wash Post, Bostom Globe, LA times,New Yorker, Sat Eve Post, Chicago Tribune, all the favorite lib columnists, from all the lib papers.  And quotes from books, and lib tv, you should read "Witness. 99.99% of these are unchallenged, she uses their own words, a small amount of paraphasing is questioned, but never the substance of the arguement.

[bufton6]

Ugh. Emaciated, cretinous lunatic.

[verbod]

she's a dumb bitch

[scotfreak]

she has liberal friends? im pretty left, i would respect her if she didnt act so bitchy and intolerant

[bcfbasil]

@scotfreak Have you ever watched the view? Those girls wrote the book on bitchy and intolerant! Besides, when it comes to liberalism, why shouldn't she be bitchy - that's the ideology that ignores our Constitution and will one day destroy our country (at least the country as our Founding Father intended it)

[scotfreak]

@bcfbasil um what about the republitard on the view, plus i hate the virw, they are a bunch of old hens (not whoopi, i like whoopi), we dont ignore the constitution, we just change things, we cant be so stuck on a document thats form the 1700's, we have to change to fit the times, what if the constitution said to kill ourselves at age 30? would you do it? we have to change with the times and do what is best for this country to survive

[patf22]

Thanx! Ann Coulter is beautiful, brilliant & brave, not to mention hilarious. One sees why the befuddled Left hates her so rabidly. BTW the late George Carlin handled himself OK in your clip: almost as cool as Ann. I recommend both "How to Talk to a Liberal (If you Must)," and "Guilty!" BTW, she looks hot on the cover of all her books! : )

[SammyClammy]

@patf22 she has a horrible horse face..........are you fucking blind?

[IHABC8]

Liberals are HIGHLY superior and smarter than the white right. You confuse me.

[brad3378]

I wonder if Rush Limbaugh has ever tapped that ass?

[johnsontlast]

i am the furtherest on the left of anyone i know....but i find Ms. Coulter to be the most impossibly Beautiful Woman...amazing photogenic...i am truly stunned by Her and never miss an opportunity to watch Her, even if the sound is turned down

[littlekaz3]

She is a true consertive we need more people like her.

[TheRavenEffect666]

No she isnt.

[alep85]

You might want to spell conservative right so people take you even the least bit seriously. Also, to call her a true conservative is like calling George W. Bush a fiscal-conservative, it's laughable at best.

[BonnieBeeGood]

Bravo! Great song, great job! I like this a lot...I love her, too! She's unique, witty, insightful,independent and brilliant!

(PS: I look a lot like her.)