@BoredomCorner ... I just don't understand how LV film clips relate to what you are saying? Other then that my friend you did a freaking fantastic job.. Just my 2 cents, loved it regardless... Mike
@cabl3guy2012 It's a generic title sequence, it doesn't have to be episode specific. How many TV shows do you know of, where the intro relates PRECISELY to the episode at hand?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
anyone who religiously shaves all the hair on their head has some deep unresolved psych issues. Not a person who should easily engender trust.
as for partition politics, the "loyal" opposition swears an oath to serve Canada yet the bloc are working for separation. This treason, and it is treason by law, is just another day at work for parliment.
seriously, what I wrote is beyond your comprehension!? Wow you should be embarrassed but...thats the nature of ignorance.
You've obviously either did not read or understand all of the words in the statement, meaning you are not interested in facts, but rather your chance to yap. Your opinion means just as much to me as it does to everyone else.
@4Dmetricology I do not wish to take sides, nor do I wish to offend, but I would like to illuminate the fact that 1HK (Human, as you two have called him) initiated the insults. Not only that, but when BC responded, 1HK thusly responded in a manner that can only be described as malicious.
I am not one for vulgarity, but 1HK's response displeased even myself. So I do not blame BC for his outrage. I do, however, disagree with your attack on BC. Disagreements may occur, and your contribution is welcome, in my opinion, but they should never take on the same demeanour of another member of the discussion, that you have perceive as unwarranted.
@1HumanKind Let me help clear things up for everyone:
1. He asked you why you think people who shave their heads have mental issues. Fair enough question, as I am curious as to where you have gained this information.
2. He made a request for you to watch a previous video of his, in hopes you would come to logical understanding as to why he has a shaved head. And if you had read my prior response (which I'm sure you must have) I explained the situation very blatantly.
3. He is correct that a party wanting to separate a province isn't treason. If it were then every Bloquiste could and would be arrested on the spot. It can actually be compared to the very first government of Canada where the Conservatives won, and then absorbed the Anti-Confederates into their party (a Nova Scotian based separatist movement). Also, in 1993 the Bloc WAS the official opposition and it was not treason then either, merely legally voted-in members of parliament.
4. I, personally, am not familiar with Stephen Harper's former affiliation with the Alberta succession movement, although I do know that he was the co-author of the "Alberta Agenda" which, in it's wordiness, appears to want more independence but without leaving Canada. But that is merely my interpretation of it.
@SocioPassage I think it was in Harper's speech to the National Citizen's Coalition, where he said that Canada having multiple national governments would be a better place.
yup. like any "politician" he goes for the leverage. And is still interested in regional division of power/$. Of course unlike the bloc he has never established a referendum on separation, and does not think it smart.
Although having a christian fundamentalist with any power is frightening, Harper is one of the smartest politicians in Ottawa. (Smartest as a politician)
@4Dmetricology If Harper were really that smart, he wouldn't be constantly deflecting and attacking people who ask him about the detainee issue, because even a blind man can see that looks a lot like a cover-up.
5. It is true that Harper had worked with the Bloc Quebecois in order to take down the Liberal Party in 2006. "Coalition" was never mentioned, as it is a word conservatives use sparingly.
Sad as it is, and as much as I personally HATE politics, I would hereby like to advocate the formation of a new party. At this point, it seems like the only option that's honestly viable. At this rate, we're going to have to elect the Green Party (I mean no insult to them) in order to have a government that might actually DO SOMETHING. I'm fucking sick of this.
I call all the willing to arms. At this rate, we will become the US. Stand up for Canada, and all the things we hold dear.
Good Job, well spoken man!
You just need a better though
bro.. KEEP IT UP!
Mike Roy
CAPP/WeAreChange/CEP London
cabl3guy2012 1 year ago
@cabl3guy2012 A better though? What's that?
BoredomCorner 1 year ago
@BoredomCorner ... I just don't understand how LV film clips relate to what you are saying? Other then that my friend you did a freaking fantastic job.. Just my 2 cents, loved it regardless... Mike
cabl3guy2012 1 year ago
@cabl3guy2012 It's a generic title sequence, it doesn't have to be episode specific. How many TV shows do you know of, where the intro relates PRECISELY to the episode at hand?
BoredomCorner 1 year ago
@BoredomCorner .. True bud :) Stil loved it.. Keep it up
cabl3guy2012 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
anyone who religiously shaves all the hair on their head has some deep unresolved psych issues. Not a person who should easily engender trust.
as for partition politics, the "loyal" opposition swears an oath to serve Canada yet the bloc are working for separation. This treason, and it is treason by law, is just another day at work for parliment.
1HumanKind 1 year ago
@1HumanKind He shaved his head for cancer, and raised $505 doing so. He does not shave his head 'religiously' as you have suggested.
SocioPassage 1 year ago 3
@1HumanKind 1HK -- clearly you're not very concerned with facts, but I'm going to dress you down anyway.
1) On what basis do you figure that someone who shaves their head, has mental issues?
2) Bother watching my video "Offing My Locks" and you'll find out why I shaved my head once.
3) Wanting to separate a province, isn't treason. I've looked.
4) Harper wanted to separate Alberta, so even if it was, then by your logic he's a traitor too.
5) Oh, and Harper's worked with the Bloc.
EPIC FAIL.
BoredomCorner 1 year ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@BoredomCorner
seriously, what I wrote is beyond your comprehension!? Wow you should be embarrassed but...thats the nature of ignorance.
You've obviously either did not read or understand all of the words in the statement, meaning you are not interested in facts, but rather your chance to yap. Your opinion means just as much to me as it does to everyone else.
Stick to stuff you can understand.
1HumanKind 1 year ago
@1HumanKind Speak for yourself -- I never said that your rambling was beyond my comprehension. I said that it was DEAD WRONG.
If you're just going to act like a fucking asshole, you're not going to be welcome on this channel anymore.
BoredomCorner 1 year ago
so many childish thoughts in one little paragraph...which is obvious to all reading it. I know you don't see it but that kinda proves Humans point.
Guess you do have unresolved issues. One of the reasons anyone interested in politics should be banned from it.
You did start insulting Human then claim he is the asshole. Not to mention the whole "dress down" joke. Just how old are you anyway?
As for sticking to stuff you can understand, that seems unfair. That's discrimination.
4Dmetricology 1 year ago
@4Dmetricology 1) What did I say that was childish?
2) Human didn't even HAVE a point, he just said a bunch of gibberish.
3) I insulted Human because he made points that were below the belt and clearly wrong, if he'd made any effort whatsoever to check the facts.
4) "Dressing down" is common slang for berating someone for being stupid. Look it up.
5) I'm 26. Human is 39, supposedly. Yet I was able to use facts to make my case, he didn't even try.
6) Do you actually have a point?
BoredomCorner 1 year ago
@4Dmetricology I do not wish to take sides, nor do I wish to offend, but I would like to illuminate the fact that 1HK (Human, as you two have called him) initiated the insults. Not only that, but when BC responded, 1HK thusly responded in a manner that can only be described as malicious.
SocioPassage 1 year ago 3
@4Dmetricology
I am not one for vulgarity, but 1HK's response displeased even myself. So I do not blame BC for his outrage. I do, however, disagree with your attack on BC. Disagreements may occur, and your contribution is welcome, in my opinion, but they should never take on the same demeanour of another member of the discussion, that you have perceive as unwarranted.
SocioPassage 1 year ago 3
@1HumanKind Let me help clear things up for everyone:
1. He asked you why you think people who shave their heads have mental issues. Fair enough question, as I am curious as to where you have gained this information.
2. He made a request for you to watch a previous video of his, in hopes you would come to logical understanding as to why he has a shaved head. And if you had read my prior response (which I'm sure you must have) I explained the situation very blatantly.
SocioPassage 1 year ago 3
@1HumanKind
3. He is correct that a party wanting to separate a province isn't treason. If it were then every Bloquiste could and would be arrested on the spot. It can actually be compared to the very first government of Canada where the Conservatives won, and then absorbed the Anti-Confederates into their party (a Nova Scotian based separatist movement). Also, in 1993 the Bloc WAS the official opposition and it was not treason then either, merely legally voted-in members of parliament.
SocioPassage 1 year ago 3
@1HumanKind
4. I, personally, am not familiar with Stephen Harper's former affiliation with the Alberta succession movement, although I do know that he was the co-author of the "Alberta Agenda" which, in it's wordiness, appears to want more independence but without leaving Canada. But that is merely my interpretation of it.
SocioPassage 1 year ago 2
@SocioPassage I think it was in Harper's speech to the National Citizen's Coalition, where he said that Canada having multiple national governments would be a better place.
BoredomCorner 1 year ago
@SocioPassage
yup. like any "politician" he goes for the leverage. And is still interested in regional division of power/$. Of course unlike the bloc he has never established a referendum on separation, and does not think it smart.
Although having a christian fundamentalist with any power is frightening, Harper is one of the smartest politicians in Ottawa. (Smartest as a politician)
4Dmetricology 1 year ago
@4Dmetricology If Harper were really that smart, he wouldn't be constantly deflecting and attacking people who ask him about the detainee issue, because even a blind man can see that looks a lot like a cover-up.
BoredomCorner 1 year ago
@1HumanKind
5. It is true that Harper had worked with the Bloc Quebecois in order to take down the Liberal Party in 2006. "Coalition" was never mentioned, as it is a word conservatives use sparingly.
SocioPassage 1 year ago 2
You gave me goosebumps on an otherwise dreadful day. Thanks. And, please come and post on C.R.U.S.H., we need you. (o: (---Brad.)
GreenDreamsDotCa 1 year ago
@GreenDreamsDotCa I did put the link to this in CRUSH, but it doesn't seem to read as a posted item for some reason.
BoredomCorner 1 year ago
Sad as it is, and as much as I personally HATE politics, I would hereby like to advocate the formation of a new party. At this point, it seems like the only option that's honestly viable. At this rate, we're going to have to elect the Green Party (I mean no insult to them) in order to have a government that might actually DO SOMETHING. I'm fucking sick of this.
I call all the willing to arms. At this rate, we will become the US. Stand up for Canada, and all the things we hold dear.
AlexcekSerosis 1 year ago
Well said, Stephen!
SaniyaCanada 1 year ago