If You Would Like To Do An Experiment Proving The Harmful And Lasting Effects Of Microwave Radiation Divide Equal Part Dry Potting Soil Equal Parts Water .Boil one Part Water on Stove 3 min. - Other in Micro . Water Both Soils Plant Dry Bean Seeds in Each Pot and Observe . My Observations Were That 98 % Stove Watered Beans Sprouted & 100% Micro. Watered Beans Rotted and Grew Mold Fungus in a Matter of a Few Days .Using the Scientific Method I Believe You'll Be Startled Best Wishes
Microwave energy is no more harmful than a heatlamp. You wouldn't put your hand on a hotplate for the same reason you'd want to avoid directional antennas - they get warm and even that little grid antenna has only 1/10th the heating power of tea lite.
UV, Xray and gamma radiation cause cancer, Microwaves are FAR less energetic at any power level than even UV so no, he doesn't belong in jail and the FCC agrees.
I don't agree with you, I my self suffer every day from mircoware energy, from WIFI and mobile phones, and I belive that it cab cause cancer. You can belive what you want , but this guy should think of other people before thinkning how to make some money.
The problem with your argument is that any emission of less than 2.9Ev potential per photon lacks the energy to cause ionization in your body. No amount or length of exposure to Microwaves (each photon has only 0.00001 electron volts) can cause cancer. That would be like saying clapping your hands causes lightning. It just can't happen - no mater how intense or prolonged the trial is. Thousands of animals have lived in saturated chamber and get cancer at the same rate as the radio free rats.
It might not have the energy to cause it right away, but after several years of exposure it might and it does. The problem with your approach is that you dismiss what you can't see. And in order to see that EMR can cause cancer you need to look at the microscope for 20 years or more.
If you don't agree with me, that is fine, you don't have to. Just bear in mind that there are people like me all over the world who suffer from EMR, and lots of people who already got cancer pulled out of their heads shaped like a cell phone antenna.
Do you believe that if you were presented with ten identical black boxes, all packed full of rocks and hand warmers, except one with a 100mW transmitter at 2.4gHz, that you could tell which is which?
So far, all double blind experiments have failed to demonstrate any ability to detect low power radio, instantly or over prolonged periods.
If you could demonstrate such an ability,you would be very quickly invited into the medical community to help others who suffer under your condition.
I belive that I can do that, after an exposure of seveal minutes I can feel the source and then I need a day or 2 to revcover.
And there was a test like that with EHS person, it is called the assex study, in which the buttom line was that poeple could not guess right if there was or was not radiation, but a closer look at the data shows that they did guessed it right 70% of the time, even without having time to recover
"Overall, cognitive functioning was not affected by short-term
exposure to either GSM or UMTS signals in the current study. These findings are consistent with those of Haarala e tal. [2003,2005]; Regeletal. [2006]; Russo
The Essex Study found no more than a +-0.1% variation on cognitive ability amongst EHS sufferers and control subjects. 5% is the minimum necessary to not be considered random variation and measurement error.
Were is the 70% figure at? I want to see where it's from if it's true.
And just what would be the health impact of that, Doctor moffin01? You wouldn't want to stand in front of it IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY. The strength of the signal drops proportionately for each foot you step away from it, THEN, it is going through concrete walls, which attenuate the signal even more. Some television and radio transmission towers operate at 100,000 effective watts of radiated power and they are at a safe distance from people- or they could literally be COOKED. Finish 6th grade k?
Thank you for your comment. Please refer to the BioInitiative Report. Also please know that when govt/telcos refer to WHO when defending the safety of mobile technology we are being duped. Most research from the WHO's EMF Project is funded & influenced by industry.
Thank you for your comment. Please refer to the BioInitiative Report. Also please know that when govt/telcos refer to WHO when defending the safety of mobile technology we are being duped. Most research from the WHO's EMF Project is funded & influenced by industry.
Thank you for your comment. Please refer to the BioInitiative Report. Also please know that when govt/telcos refer to WHO when defending the safety of mobile technology we are being duped. Most research from the WHO's EMF Project is funded & influenced by industry.
Most research from the WHO's EMF Project is funded & influenced by industry. Also I have found many interesting studies on the populatopn surrounding TV and Radio transmitters that show an increased incidence of cancer. Unfortunately with the rollout of 3g the cells are very small (you'll find antennae in cities every 1/2 to 1km) which exposes a higher amount of people to 24/7 radiation. Concrete wall will slow down rf-emr, but not stop them. Once again, thank you for your indepth resopnse.
I work in this career field. What he has setup COULD be dangerous depending on the amplitude/frequency of the signal emitted. However, regular WiFi antenna's should pose no health risk. The fact is that your own body emits RF energy. It's everywhere in nature already.
Most wireless networks operate at a frequency of 2.45 GHz, which means that these transmitters send out radio waves at 2,450,000,000 cycles per second. This is the same frequency at which microwave ovens operate. It turns out that this frequency is ideal for cooking food as it was discovered that 2.45 GHz uniquely excites water molecules to such an extent that it causes them to heat. This is called the thermal effect of radio frequency (RF) radiation. radiationresearch dot org
@vrwc24 There are documents that have just recently surfaced proving you are wrong. It's pretty easy to access them. They are located at the magdahavas site under the Dr. Zory Glacer files. Pick of the Week #18: "Effect of Microwaves on the Central Nervous System 1965 – German translation " or "Pick of the Week #12: Why Pulsed Microwave Frequencies are More Harmful."or "Pick of the Week #1: More than 2000 Documents prior to 1972 on Bioeffects of Radio Frequency Radiation" in pdf file form.
i loved the idea of wifi till it made me physically sick! these heartless evil phone companies are radiating are cities with these dangerous wireless technologies, just so coffee slurping, trendy smug 20 somethings get wander around with there oh so stylish apple laptops. this is all going to end in tears!
thanks for informing the public on this kind of information. We need to figure out how to create an organzied effort so people understand how dangerous electro-magnetic fields from cell phones and other wireless technologies can be. thanks
One of these days I'll lock a signal on him and beam him up his rectum like Targeted Individuals deal with everyday.
ella5024 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If You Would Like To Do An Experiment Proving The Harmful And Lasting Effects Of Microwave Radiation Divide Equal Part Dry Potting Soil Equal Parts Water .Boil one Part Water on Stove 3 min. - Other in Micro . Water Both Soils Plant Dry Bean Seeds in Each Pot and Observe . My Observations Were That 98 % Stove Watered Beans Sprouted & 100% Micro. Watered Beans Rotted and Grew Mold Fungus in a Matter of a Few Days .Using the Scientific Method I Believe You'll Be Startled Best Wishes
skypeeps 2 years ago
"you don't want to stand in front of that, it is pretty powerful!" - This guy should be in jail!
NoRadBlog 2 years ago
Microwave energy is no more harmful than a heatlamp. You wouldn't put your hand on a hotplate for the same reason you'd want to avoid directional antennas - they get warm and even that little grid antenna has only 1/10th the heating power of tea lite.
UV, Xray and gamma radiation cause cancer, Microwaves are FAR less energetic at any power level than even UV so no, he doesn't belong in jail and the FCC agrees.
flick2040 2 years ago
I don't agree with you, I my self suffer every day from mircoware energy, from WIFI and mobile phones, and I belive that it cab cause cancer. You can belive what you want , but this guy should think of other people before thinkning how to make some money.
NoRadBlog 2 years ago
The problem with your argument is that any emission of less than 2.9Ev potential per photon lacks the energy to cause ionization in your body. No amount or length of exposure to Microwaves (each photon has only 0.00001 electron volts) can cause cancer. That would be like saying clapping your hands causes lightning. It just can't happen - no mater how intense or prolonged the trial is. Thousands of animals have lived in saturated chamber and get cancer at the same rate as the radio free rats.
flick2040 2 years ago
It might not have the energy to cause it right away, but after several years of exposure it might and it does. The problem with your approach is that you dismiss what you can't see. And in order to see that EMR can cause cancer you need to look at the microscope for 20 years or more.
NoRadBlog 2 years ago
If you don't agree with me, that is fine, you don't have to. Just bear in mind that there are people like me all over the world who suffer from EMR, and lots of people who already got cancer pulled out of their heads shaped like a cell phone antenna.
NoRadBlog 2 years ago
Do you believe that if you were presented with ten identical black boxes, all packed full of rocks and hand warmers, except one with a 100mW transmitter at 2.4gHz, that you could tell which is which?
So far, all double blind experiments have failed to demonstrate any ability to detect low power radio, instantly or over prolonged periods.
If you could demonstrate such an ability,you would be very quickly invited into the medical community to help others who suffer under your condition.
flick2040 2 years ago
I belive that I can do that, after an exposure of seveal minutes I can feel the source and then I need a day or 2 to revcover.
And there was a test like that with EHS person, it is called the assex study, in which the buttom line was that poeple could not guess right if there was or was not radiation, but a closer look at the data shows that they did guessed it right 70% of the time, even without having time to recover
NoRadBlog 2 years ago
Quote directly from the Essex Study:
"Overall, cognitive functioning was not affected by short-term
exposure to either GSM or UMTS signals in the current study. These findings are consistent with those of Haarala e tal. [2003,2005]; Regeletal. [2006]; Russo
e tal. [2006]; Cineletal. [2008]; Riddervoldetal.
[2008] and Unterlechneretal.[2008]."
flick2040 2 years ago
70%? Where do you get that from?
The Essex Study found no more than a +-0.1% variation on cognitive ability amongst EHS sufferers and control subjects. 5% is the minimum necessary to not be considered random variation and measurement error.
Were is the 70% figure at? I want to see where it's from if it's true.
flick2040 2 years ago
This must be stopped.
sweetelesue 2 years ago
yeah right i say make a cable network. 1 its faster and a perm connection!
ultragaming1993 2 years ago
can i use a jammer on that guy? :D :D :D
surefirefan 4 years ago
I don't think I'd want to know how much radiation you would have to be bombarded with to jam his equipment.
supasonicman 3 years ago
Naw, you'd only have to jam the laptops on the other end, they'd have much less power.
supasonicman 3 years ago
this guy is a piece of shit, I would fucking kick his head, he needs a nother hole in his head motherfucker
Altermedicine 4 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You are just mad because he's telling the truth and you have cancer from Radiation. Shut up and get your insides ate out already...
ominuka 4 years ago
wonder if this guys got any idea of the potential health impact of what he's doing.....
moffin01 4 years ago 3
And just what would be the health impact of that, Doctor moffin01? You wouldn't want to stand in front of it IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY. The strength of the signal drops proportionately for each foot you step away from it, THEN, it is going through concrete walls, which attenuate the signal even more. Some television and radio transmission towers operate at 100,000 effective watts of radiated power and they are at a safe distance from people- or they could literally be COOKED. Finish 6th grade k?
antney1108 3 years ago
Thank you for your comment. Please refer to the BioInitiative Report. Also please know that when govt/telcos refer to WHO when defending the safety of mobile technology we are being duped. Most research from the WHO's EMF Project is funded & influenced by industry.
moffin01 3 years ago
Thank you for your comment. Please refer to the BioInitiative Report. Also please know that when govt/telcos refer to WHO when defending the safety of mobile technology we are being duped. Most research from the WHO's EMF Project is funded & influenced by industry.
moffin01 3 years ago 2
Thank you for your comment. Please refer to the BioInitiative Report. Also please know that when govt/telcos refer to WHO when defending the safety of mobile technology we are being duped. Most research from the WHO's EMF Project is funded & influenced by industry.
moffin01 3 years ago
why are you using the internet? shouldnt you be in your cave?
smeglover 2 years ago
Most research from the WHO's EMF Project is funded & influenced by industry. Also I have found many interesting studies on the populatopn surrounding TV and Radio transmitters that show an increased incidence of cancer. Unfortunately with the rollout of 3g the cells are very small (you'll find antennae in cities every 1/2 to 1km) which exposes a higher amount of people to 24/7 radiation. Concrete wall will slow down rf-emr, but not stop them. Once again, thank you for your indepth resopnse.
moffin01 3 years ago
I cant wait till Im able to get a wife and move out into the country away from guys like this.
gardnerbm 4 years ago 7
bust wifi and haarp/gmts/umts(3g)/elv/ulv emitters with simple towerbuster or other ORGONITE PRODUCTS!
greetz
fumanshu888 4 years ago
hmm there is some idiots (or people from company)in this forum.
i hopethey will get sick fucking idiots
murdock490 4 years ago
time for the jammers
stoniez 5 years ago 3
I work in this career field. What he has setup COULD be dangerous depending on the amplitude/frequency of the signal emitted. However, regular WiFi antenna's should pose no health risk. The fact is that your own body emits RF energy. It's everywhere in nature already.
vrwc24 5 years ago
Most wireless networks operate at a frequency of 2.45 GHz, which means that these transmitters send out radio waves at 2,450,000,000 cycles per second. This is the same frequency at which microwave ovens operate. It turns out that this frequency is ideal for cooking food as it was discovered that 2.45 GHz uniquely excites water molecules to such an extent that it causes them to heat. This is called the thermal effect of radio frequency (RF) radiation. radiationresearch dot org
factsnow 4 years ago
vrwc The body emits Radio Frequency energy? Are we
natural radios ourselves are you saying?
Can you explain how the body emits RF energy naturally
from nature?
dbootsthediva 4 years ago 2
@vrwc24 There are documents that have just recently surfaced proving you are wrong. It's pretty easy to access them. They are located at the magdahavas site under the Dr. Zory Glacer files. Pick of the Week #18: "Effect of Microwaves on the Central Nervous System 1965 – German translation " or "Pick of the Week #12: Why Pulsed Microwave Frequencies are More Harmful."or "Pick of the Week #1: More than 2000 Documents prior to 1972 on Bioeffects of Radio Frequency Radiation" in pdf file form.
2011so5 2 months ago
i loved the idea of wifi till it made me physically sick! these heartless evil phone companies are radiating are cities with these dangerous wireless technologies, just so coffee slurping, trendy smug 20 somethings get wander around with there oh so stylish apple laptops. this is all going to end in tears!
dietdictocrat 5 years ago 8
thanks for informing the public on this kind of information. We need to figure out how to create an organzied effort so people understand how dangerous electro-magnetic fields from cell phones and other wireless technologies can be. thanks
breatheasy7000 5 years ago
Yeah, that guy is an ass. Those antennas are Not supposed to be mounted on ground level pointing horizontally through public space at point blank.
Thanks for the tumors.
newton2013 5 years ago 2
What a moron.
websuspect 5 years ago